renewing the sectional struggle 1848-1854

25
RENEWING THE SECTIONAL STRUGGLE 1848-1854 Ayanna Ogaldez and Haleigh Heflin

Upload: beate

Post on 22-Feb-2016

54 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854. Ayanna Ogaldez and Haleigh Heflin. The sovereignty panacea. Both political parties enjoyed powerful support in both the North and the South It would not have been beneficial to the Union if there were to be two purely sectional political parties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

RENEWING THE SECTIONAL

STRUGGLE 1848-1854

Ayanna Ogaldez and Haleigh Heflin

Page 2: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

THE SOVEREIGNTY PANACEA Both political parties enjoyed powerful

support in both the North and the South

It would not have been beneficial to the Union if there were to be two purely sectional political parties

The Democratic National Convention in Baltimore turned to an aging leader, General Lewis Cass as their candidate for presidency. He is known as the Father of Popular Sovereignty

Page 3: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

THE SOVEREIGNTY PANACEA Popular Sovereignty- stated that the

sovereign people of a territory under the general principles of the Constitution should themselves determine the status of slavery

Popular with both the public and politicians

Had one fatal defect; it might serve to spread the blight of slavery

Page 4: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

POLITICAL TRIUMPHS FOR GENERAL TAYLOR

• The candidate for the Whig Party was Zachary Taylor, the Mexican American War hero

• He had never held political office or voted for president • He was popular with the public, and the Whigs were able to

avoid all controversial issues during his campaign.• Unhappy antislavery people in the North organized the Free

Soil Party, a party that was committed against the spread of slavery in the territories, advocated for government for internal improvements and pressured the government to provide free homesteads for settlers• This party appealed to people who didn’t want blacks in

the new territory and conscience Whigs who didn’t like slavery because of moral beliefs

• The Free -Soilers’ nominated Martin Van Buren • Neither party talked about slavery, and Taylor won by a

narrow margin

Page 5: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

“CALIFORNY GOLD” In 1848 gold was discovered in California Many people rushed to California to try and

get rich This brought a lot of violence and disease

that the small California government couldn’t handle

The California government needed protection from the renegades and made their own Constitution that outlawed slavery and passed in 1849.

They applied and were granted statehood in 1850, much to the South's disdain.

It tipped the balance of power in Congress toward states that were against slavery.

Page 6: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

California Gold Miner

Political Cartoon of Zachary Taylor

Page 7: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

SECTIONAL BALANCE AND THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD

In 1850, the South was relatively prosperous, it’s cotton fields were expanding and the price of cotton was increasing

There were not that many people in the North or South that thought slavery was threatened where it already existed

There were 15 slave states and 15 free states but, the admission of California would upset the already delicate balance between free and slave states in Congress

Page 8: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

SECTIONAL BALANCE AND THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD

There was not that much potential slave territory left, and there was already tension building up in both the Utah and New Mexico territories because some in those territories wanted them to be admitted as free states

Many Southerners were also upset about the number of slaves that were lost to the Underground Railroad, which wasn’t actually a railroad, but a system of informal chain “stations” (antislavery) through which many “passengers” (runaway slaves) were taken through by “conductors” (usually black or

white abolitionists) from slave states to the free soil of Canada

Page 9: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854
Page 10: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

TWILIGHT OF THE SENATORIAL GIANTS

The Congressional Debate of 1850 was called to talk about the admission of California as a free state and the possible secession of some southern states

Henry Clay, John Calhoun and Daniel Webster known as the Immortal Trio spoke at the debate.

Clay, known as the Great Compromiser proposed a series of compromises such as the idea that the North make up a stricter Fugitive Slave Law

Page 11: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

TWILIGHT OF THE SENATORIAL GIANTS

John Calhoun, the Great Nullifier, proposed that slavery be left alone, that runaway slaves be returned, that the South get their rights as minority, and that the political balance be restored. His idea was that there would be 2 presidents, one from the North and one from the South

Daniel Webster, proposed that all compromises be made with the South and that the North enact a new fugitive slavery law. Though he was against slavery, he agreed that the South was very important to the Union.

Webster’s famous Seventh of March Speech of 1850 helped to turn the tide in the North toward compromise. His attempt visibly improved Union sentiment. However, Free Soilers and abolitionists saw him as a traitor.

Page 12: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

Henry Clay

John Calhoun

Daniel Webster

Page 13: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

DEADLOCK AND DANGER ON CAPITOL HILL

The Northern “New Guard "hadn't grown up with the Union and as a result wanted to cleanse and purify it as opposed to patch it up

William H. Seward was an antislavery senator from NY, and spokesperson for much of the “New Guard” Against concession Argued that there was a power higher than the

Constitution Didn’t realize that the Union was built off of

compromise and without it, split would be inevitable

President Taylor had fallen under Seward’s influence and seemed to want to veto all compromises Because of this, the Civil War almost broke out in

1850

Page 14: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

BREAKING THE CONGRESSIONAL LOGJAM

President Taylor died suddenly in 1850

Millard Filmore took over He then signed the Compromise of 1850 However, it was just as hard to get the country

to agree to this compromise as it was Congress The “Immortal Trio” spoke on behalf of the

compromise The South hated the compromise, but eventually

accepted it Another Era of Good Feelings dawned

Page 15: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

WHAT WAS GAINED IN THE COMPROMISE OF 1850….

NORTH SOUTHCalifornia was admitted as a free state.

Popular sovereignty in the Mexican Cession lands.

Texas lost it’s disputed territory to New Mexico and Oklahoma.

Texas was paid $10 million for the land lost to New Mexico

The District of Columbia could not have slave trade, however, slavery was still legal.

A new, tougher Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 was instated and more drastic than the previous version.

Page 16: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

DEFEAT AND DOOM FOR THE WHIGS

In 1852 the Democrats nominated Franklin Pierce, who was unknown and enemy-less.

The Whigs nominated Winfield Scott, a veteran of the War of 1812.

The Whigs were split in political beliefs, so Pierce won by a landslide. This brought about the death of the Whig party, and the rise of sectional political alignment.

Page 17: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

EXPANSIONIST STIRRINGS SOUTH OF THE BORDER

Pierce’s cabinet was filled with Southerners like Jefferson Davis and he was all set to be a tool for the Southerners

In July of 1856 William Walker invaded Nicaragua, proclaimed himself president and legalized slavery However, a group of Latin American leaders

overthrew him This threw some fuel into the idea of the

“Slavocracy Theory” (the theory that the South was always trying to find new slave land)

Page 18: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

Franklin Pierce

Jefferson Davis

Page 19: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

EXPANSIONIST STIRRINGS SOUTH OF THE BORDER

The U.S. also wanted Cuba However, Spain would not sell it at any cost After two failed attempts to take Cuba and the

Spanish captured the American Steamer “Black Warrior, 3 U.S. foreign ministers met in Ostend, Belgium and drew up the Ostend Manifesto which stated that the U.S. would offer Spain 120 million dollars for Cuba, or they would invade it Northerners were vey upset once they found out about

the document The South was upset because it would not have been

able to get Cuba as a slave state Pierce was embarrassed and even more fuel was

thrown into the “Slavocracy Theory”

Page 20: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

THE ALLURE OF ASIA In the Pacific, America was ready to open up to Asia

Caleb Crushing was sent to China on a goodwill mission

The Chinese were welcoming because they wanted to counter the British The U.S. China trade began to flourish Missionaries also sought to save souls in China;

however, they mostly encountered resentment Relations with Japan were opened when

Commodore Matthew C. Perry went to Tokyo in 1854 and coerced/forced/asked them to open their nation

The Treaty of Kanagawa formally opened up Japan, and broke their centuries old tradition of isolation and put them on the road to militarism, modernism, and imperialism

Page 21: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

PACIFIC RAILROAD PROMOTERS AND THE GADSEN PURCHASE

Though the U.S. owned Oregon and California, it was very difficult for potential settlers to get there because the sea routes were very long, the land routes were dangerous. So, the only real solution was a railroad The Southerners wanted a route in the South, but

the best one would go through Mexico, so Jefferson Davis, the Secretary of War made it so James Gadsden was appointed as minister to Mexico

Santa Anna, the ruler of Mexico at that time agreed to sell that portion of Mexico for $10 million. This was known as the Gadsden Purchase

The South appeared to have control of the railroad, but the North said that if organization was the problem, then Nebraska should be organized

Page 22: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

DOUGLAS’ KANSAS NEBRASKA SCHEME

Senator Stephen Douglas proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act Let slavery in Kansas and Nebraska, but only by

popular sovereignty. However, the Act would conflict with the

Missouri Compromise that had banned any slavery north of the 36, 30’ line.

The Southerners had never considered Kansas a possible slave state, so they backed the bill, but Northerners rallied against it.

Nevertheless, the Act passed through Congress, and nullified the Missouri Compromise.

Page 23: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

CONGRESS LEGISLATES A CIVIL WAR

The Kansas-Nebraska Act wrecked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and indirectly wrecked the Compromise of 1850.

Northerners no longer enforced the Fugitive Slave Law at all, and Southerners were angry.

The Democratic party was hopelessly split, and after 1856, would not have a president elect for 28 years.

Page 24: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

BIBLIOGRAPHY apnotes.net The American Pageant 14th Edition

Page 25: Renewing The sectional struggle 1848-1854

THE END