renormalization group: -theory and -expansion2016/03/23 · renormalization group: -theory and...
TRANSCRIPT
Renormalization group:
-theory and -expansion
Henri Orland IPhT, CEA-Saclay (France)
CSRC, Beijing (China)
'4 "
Outline• Ising model: from lattice to continuous field theory
• Dimensional analysis, power counting, UV cut-off
• Critical dimension, relevant-irrelevant operators
• Renormalization group: the Gaussian model
• Renormalization group: cumulant expansion
• The fixed points: Gaussian and non-trivial
• -expansion, order one and higher orders.
• Relation to Renormalization theory in QFT
"
Ising model: From lattice model to continuous Field Theory
• Ising model: magnetic spins along the z-direction, in a magnetic field
• Short range interactions between any pair of spins i and j . We study a ferromagnetic system (e.g. nearest neighbor interactions)
• Partition function
Jij = J(ri � rj)
Jij < 0
Si = ±1
Z =X
Si=±1
e�2
Pi,j KijSiSj+�H
Pi Si
Kij = �Jij > 0
• Gaussian integral
• so
• Partition function
ZNY
i=1
dx
i
e
� 12xiAijxj+uixi =
(2⇡)N/2
pdetA
e
12uiA
�1ij uj
e�2 KijSiSj ⇠
Z NY
i=1
d�ie� �
2 �iK�1ij �j+��iSi
Z =X
Si=±1
Z NY
i=1
d�ie� �
2 �iK�1ij �je�
Pi(H+�i)Si
=
Z NY
i=1
d�ie� �
2 �iK�1ij �j+
Pi log 2 cosh �(H+�i)
K(k) =
ZddreikrK(r)
K�1(k) =1
K(k)
Large distance behavior k ! 0
K(k) ⇠k!0 K0(1� ck2) c > 0
K(k)�1 ⇠k!0 K�10 (1 + ck2)
r � a
macroscopic distance
microscopic scale
X
i,j
�iK�1ij �j ⇠ K�1
0
Zddk
(2⇡)d�̃(k)(1 + ck2 + . . .)�̃(�k)
The continuous limit
• If we are interested in correlation functions at distances large compared to lattice spacing ( near a critical point), we can take a continuous limit.
• Exercise: shift field by magnetic field, redefine coefficients and rescale fields, expand log cosh, and show that the partition function can be written as
Z =
ZD�(r)e
�Rddr
12�(r)(�r2+r0)�(r)+h�(r)+
P1m=2 u2m�2m(r)
!
proportional to in mean-fieldT � Tc
Dimensional analysis and power counting: canonical dimensions
• All the analysis and integrals will be done in momentum space (k-space) so do dimensional analysis in momentum space UV cut-off
• It follows that
⇤ =2⇡
aZddr(r�)2 = 1 = ⇤�d+2⇤2[�] ) [�] =
d� 2
2
[r0] = 2
[u0] = [u4] = 4� d
[u2m] = d� (d� 2)m
[h] =d+ 2
2> 0
• As we will see, an operator is relevant, marginal, irrelevant if its dimension is
• The magnetic field is relevant in all dimensions.
• The “mass” is always relevant
• In d=2, all operators are relevant
• In d=3, only relevant, marginal
• In d>3, only relevant
� > 0, � = 0, � < 0�
�4 �6
�4
r0
The field-theory for critical phenomena
• As we will discuss a specific scheme of calculation (epsilon expansion), we will work around dimension 4. Then only one relevant operator. Near criticality, near dimension 4, the system is thus well described by
• Note that is the difference between terms from
• and from the log cosh, so it can change sign
�4
�4 field-theoryr0
K(k)
Z =
ZD�(r)e
�Rddr
⇣12�(r)(�r2+r0)�(r)+
u04! �
4(r)+h�(r)
⌘
Renormalization group: the Gaussian model
• Near criticality, correlation length
• System is (nearly) scale invariant
• Equivalent of block spins: momentum shell integration
• Originally, UV cut-off
• Define
• (Try to) integrate over the fields
• Rescale momenta from
⇠ � a
⇤ =2⇡
a⇤0 = ⇤� d⇤
⇤0 < k < ⇤
⇤0 to ⇤
The Gaussian ModelAssume u0 = 0
Z =
ZD�(r)e�
Rddr( 1
2�(r)(�r2+r0)�(r)+h�(r))
�<(k) = �(k) i↵ 0 < k < ⇤0
�>(k) = �(k) i↵ ⇤0 < k < ⇤
�(k) = �<(k) + �>(k)
�<(k)�>(k) = 0
, 0 otherwise, 0 otherwise
Z =
ZD�(k) exp
�Z ⇤
0
ddk
(2⇡)d
✓1
2
�(k)(k2 + r0)�(�k)
◆+ h�(k = 0)
!
Note: the model does not have a low T phase
constantRescaling of k q =
⇤
⇤0 k
Rescaling of so that coefficient is 1/2:�< � =
✓⇤0
⇤
◆ d+22
�<
Z = Z1
ZD�<(k) exp
�Z ⇤0
0
ddk
(2⇡)d
✓1
2
�<(k)(k2+ r0)�<(�k)
◆+ h�<(k = 0)
!
Z1 =
ZD�>(k) exp
�Z ⇤
⇤0
ddk
(2⇡)d
✓1
2
�>(k)(k2+ r0)�>(�k)
◆!
Z ⇤0
0ddkk2�<(k)�<(�k) =
✓⇤0
⇤
◆d+2 Z ⇤
0ddq q2�<(q)�<(�q)
⇤0
⇤= 1� d⇤
⇤= 1� dl
System equivalent to original one, for large distancesr00 = (1� dl)�2r0
h0 = (1� dl)�d+22 h
Differential form = Flow equations
dr
dl= 2r
dh
dl=
d+ 2
2h
Canonical dimensions of operators
Relevant operators. Fixed pointsr⇤ = 0
h⇤ = 0Compute exponents!
Z = Z1
ZD�(k) exp
�Z ⇤
0
ddk
(2⇡)d
1
2
�(k)⇣k2 +
✓⇤
0
⇤
◆�2
r0⌘�(�k)
!+
✓⇤
0
⇤
◆� d+22
h�(k = 0)
!
Cumulant expansionInclude the interaction term
Z =
ZD�(r)e
�Rddr
12�(r)(�r2+r0)�(r)+
u04! �
4(r)+h�(r)
!
Take h=0In Fourier space
Z =
ZD�(k) exp
�Z ⇤
0
ddk
(2⇡)d
✓1
2
�(k)(k2 + r0)�(�k)
◆
+
u0
4!
(2⇡)dZ ⇤
0
4Y
i=1
ddki(2⇡)d
�(d)(k1 + k2 + k3 + k4)�(k1)�(k2)�(k3)�(k4)
!
Make separation� = �< + �>
In the high temperature phase (no symmetry breaking), do a cumulant expansion (equivalent to a loop expansion) to integrate over �>
Z(�<) =
ZD�> exp
✓�Z
ddr(H0(�>) + V (�<,�>))
◆
= Z0hexp✓�Z
ddrV (�<,�>)
◆i0
hW (�>)i0 =
1
Z0
ZD�> exp
✓�Z
ddrH0(�>)
◆W (�>)
Z0 =
ZD�> exp
✓�Z
ddrH0(�>)
◆
Z =
ZD�<(r) exp
✓�Z
ddr⇣1
2
�<(r)(�r2+ r0)�<(r) +
u0
4!
�4<(r)
⌘◆
⇥Z
D�>(r) exp
✓�Z
ddr⇣1
2
�>(r)(�r2+ r0)�>(r) +
u0
4!
(4�3<�> + 6�2
<�2> + 4�<�
3> + �4
>)
⌘◆
1 2 3 4
Expanding to the second cumulant
Z = Z0 exp
�Z
ddrhV (�>(r))i0 +1
2
Zddrddr0
⇣hV (�>(r))V (�>(r
0))i0 � hV (�>(r))i0hV>(�(r
0))i0
⌘!
ZddrV (�>) =
u0
4!
Zddr
�4�3
<�> + 6�2<�
2> + 4�<�
3> + �4
>
�
=u0
4!
Z ⇤
⇤0
4Y
i=1
dki(2⇡)d
(2⇡)d�(d)(k1 + k2 + k3 + k4)c↵�↵(k1)�↵(k2)�↵(k3)�↵(k4)
ZddrH0(�>) =
1
2
Zddr �>(r)(�r2 + r0)�>(r)
=1
2
Z ⇤
⇤0
ddk
(2⇡)d�>(k)(k
2 + r)�>(�k)
coeff. 1,4,6
1 2 3 4
Wick TheoremZ
NY
i=1
dx
i
e
� 12xiAijxj+uixi =
(2⇡)N/2
pdetA
e
12uiA
�1ij uj
By taking derivatives w.r.t and then setting ui ui = 0
hxixji = A
�1ij
hxi1xi2 . . . ximi = 0 if m odd
hxi1xi2 . . . ximi =X
all complete sets of pairings
A
�1
i1iP1A
�1
i2iP2. . . A
�1
iniPn
if m evenExample:
Z +1
�1
dxp2⇡
e
� x
2
2
hx2i = 1 Wick hx2ni = (2n� 1)!! = (2n� 1).(2n� 3) . . . 3.1
Cumulant expansionh�>(k)�>(k
0)i = �(d)(k � k0)
k2 + r0
Use Wick theoremOrder 1 in V: only term 2 contributes to r0
Order 2 in V: only term 2-2 contributes to u0
h�2>(r)i =
Z ⇤
⇤0
ddk
(2⇡)d1
k2 + r0
⇡ 2d⇤d�1
(2⇡)dd⇤
⇤2 + r0= Sd⇤d�1
(2⇡)dd⇤
⇤2 + r0
where Sd =2⇡d/2
�(d/2)
1
2
⇣u0
4!
⌘2⇥ 36
Zddrddr0�2
<(r)�2<(r
0)�h�2
>(r)�2>(r
0)i � h�2>(r)ih�2
>(r0)i
�
1
2
⇣u0
4!
⌘2⇥ 2⇥ 36
Zddrddr0�2
<(r)�2<(r
0)h�>(r)�>(r0)i2
g(r � r0) = h�>(r)�>(r0)i =
Z ⇤
⇤0
ddk
(2⇡)deik(r�r0)
k2 + r0
Propagator g is short ranged (because large k): expansion in gradients
g2(r) = �0�(d)(r) + . . .
�0 =
Zddrg2(r)
=
Z ⇤
⇤0
ddk
(2⇡)d1
(k2 + r0)2
= Sd⇤d�1d⇤
(2⇡)d1
(⇤2 + r0)2
Remains to do: 1) rescale momenta from to 2) rescale so that coefficient equal 1/2
⇤0 ⇤�<
dr
dl= 2r +
u
2
Sd
(2⇡)d⇤d
(⇤2 + r)
du
dl= "u� 3
2u2 Sd
(2⇡)d⇤d
(⇤2 + r)2
" = 4� d
dh
dl=
2 + d
2hNote that
r00 = r0 +u0
2Sd
⇤d�1d⇤
(2⇡)d(⇤2 + r0)
u00 = u0 �
3
2u20Sd
⇤d�1d⇤
(2⇡)d(⇤2 + r0)2
Z = C
ZD�<(r) exp
✓�Z
⇤0ddr
⇣1
2
�<(r)(�r2+ r00)�<(r) +
u
4!
�4<(r)
⌘◆
Renormalization Group Equations for running coupling constants (r(l), u(l))
Fixed points: The epsilon expansion
Gaussian: r⇤ = u⇤ = h⇤ = 0
Non trivial: h⇤= 0, r⇤ and u⇤
of order "
To order 1 in " r⇤ = �⇤2
6"
u⇤ =16⇡2
3"
Linearize equations around non trivial fixed point:
y1 = 2� "
3> 0
y2 = �" < 0
Scanned by CamScanner
relevant
irrelevant
Critical exponents to order one in epsilon
↵ ="
6
� =1
2� "
6
� = 1 +"
6� = 3 + "
⌘ = 0
" = 4� d
• Relation to Renormalization theory in QFT