reply by authors

1
REPLY BY AUTHORS The learning curve for laparoscopic pyeloplasty is generally long and steep. Especially intracorporeal suturing in the restricted space is a technically de- manding skill that requires a long time to master. Therefore, establishment of an easily available training system for pediatric laparoscopic surgery is needed. At our institution a surgeon performed laparo- scopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy in more than 50 adults as an operator or assistant before performing laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In Japan the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System for urological laparoscopy was established in 2003. 1 The main goal of the system is to decrease complications and promote safer surgical procedures. Assessment guidelines of the system were a useful guide for us to master the standard techniques of laparoscopic pro- cedures. In addition, training exercises for suturing skill using dry laboratory models and live animals facilitated the initial performance of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Laparoscopic internal ring closure after laparoscopic orchiopexy and orchiectomy was also useful as a training procedure for suturing. 2 How- ever, even after these experiences laparoscopic py- eloplasty in children remained challenging for us because of the greater dexterity required. As the Japanese guidelines for urological laparoscopic sur- gery describe, we initially confined laparoscopic py- eloplasty to adults and older children, although the miniaturization of laparoscopic equipment has al- lowed the indications to be extended to include in- fants. 3 Consequently performance of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults and children has provided us with valuable knowledge and experience that has enabled us to improve our surgical skill, as we con- cluded in this article. The most important issues in medical training are functional outcome and patient safety. 4 Al- though pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty is rapidly becoming an acceptable procedure, to define better the real value as a minimally invasive surgery and gold standard procedure, the most efficient teaching and learning system for pediatric laparoscopic uro- logical surgery should be established. REFERENCES 1. Matsuda T, Ono Y, Terachi T et al: The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System in urological laparoscopy: a novel system in Japan. J Urol 2006; 176: 2168. 2. Kojima Y, Mizuno K, Imura M et al: Laparoscopic orchiectomy and subsequent internal ring closure for extra-abdominal testicular nubbin in children. Urology 2009; 73: 515. 3. Tanaka M, Ono Y, Matsuda T et al: Urological Laparoscopic Surgery Guideline Committee, Japa- nese Society of Endourology and ESWL. Guidelines for urological laparoscopic surgery. Int J Urol 2009; 16: 115. 4. Stolzenburg JU, Schwaibold H, Bhanot SM et al: Modular surgical training for endoscopic extraperi- toneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2005; 96: 1022. COMPARISON OF ADULT AND PEDIATRIC LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY 1468

Upload: ngokhuong

Post on 04-Jan-2017

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reply by Authors

COMPARISON OF ADULT AND PEDIATRIC LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY1468

REPLY BY AUTHORS

The learning curve for laparoscopic pyeloplasty isgenerally long and steep. Especially intracorporealsuturing in the restricted space is a technically de-manding skill that requires a long time to master.Therefore, establishment of an easily availabletraining system for pediatric laparoscopic surgery isneeded.

At our institution a surgeon performed laparo-scopic nephrectomy and adrenalectomy in morethan 50 adults as an operator or assistant beforeperforming laparoscopic pyeloplasty. In Japan theEndoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System forurological laparoscopy was established in 2003.1 Themain goal of the system is to decrease complicationsand promote safer surgical procedures. Assessmentguidelines of the system were a useful guide for us tomaster the standard techniques of laparoscopic pro-cedures. In addition, training exercises for suturingskill using dry laboratory models and live animalsfacilitated the initial performance of laparoscopicpyeloplasty. Laparoscopic internal ring closure after

REFERENCES

orchiectomy and subsequent internal ring closure 16: 115.

useful as a training procedure for suturing.2 How-ever, even after these experiences laparoscopic py-eloplasty in children remained challenging for usbecause of the greater dexterity required. As theJapanese guidelines for urological laparoscopic sur-gery describe, we initially confined laparoscopic py-eloplasty to adults and older children, although theminiaturization of laparoscopic equipment has al-lowed the indications to be extended to include in-fants.3 Consequently performance of laparoscopicpyeloplasty in adults and children has provided uswith valuable knowledge and experience that hasenabled us to improve our surgical skill, as we con-cluded in this article.

The most important issues in medical trainingare functional outcome and patient safety.4 Al-though pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty is rapidlybecoming an acceptable procedure, to define betterthe real value as a minimally invasive surgery andgold standard procedure, the most efficient teachingand learning system for pediatric laparoscopic uro-

laparoscopic orchiopexy and orchiectomy was also logical surgery should be established.

1. Matsuda T, Ono Y, Terachi T et al: The EndoscopicSurgical Skill Qualification System in urologicallaparoscopy: a novel system in Japan. J Urol 2006;

176: 2168.

2. Kojima Y, Mizuno K, Imura M et al: Laparoscopic

for extra-abdominal testicular nubbin in children.Urology 2009; 73: 515.

3. Tanaka M, Ono Y, Matsuda T et al: UrologicalLaparoscopic Surgery Guideline Committee, Japa-nese Society of Endourology and ESWL. Guidelinesfor urological laparoscopic surgery. Int J Urol 2009;

4. Stolzenburg JU, Schwaibold H, Bhanot SM et al:Modular surgical training for endoscopic extraperi-toneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2005; 96:1022.