report no 20527-03a conradie blmep …...draft confidential project no: 20527 date: july 2016 –...

REPORT NO 20527-03A

CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICESIMPACT ASSESSMENT

Confidential July 2016

DraftConfidential

Project no: 20527Date: July 2016

–WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffThe Pavilion, 1st Floor, Corner Portswoodand Beach Rd, Waterfront, CapeTown, 8001, South Africa

Tel: +27 21 481 8700Fax: +27 21 481 8771www.wspgroup.comwww.pbworld.com

CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICESIMPACT ASSESSMENTWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT ANDPUBLIC WORKS

iii

CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527July 2016 Confidential

Q U A L I T Y M A N A G E M E N TISSUE/REVISION FIRST ISSUE ISSUE 1 ISSUE 2 ISSUE 3

Remarks Draft Draft DraftFINAL(UPDATEDIMAGES)

Date April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 JULY 2016

Prepared by B. van Beek B. van Beek B. van Beek B. van Beek

Signature

Checked by J. Snyman J. Snyman J. Snyman J. Snyman

Signature

Authorised by K. Ziehl-Roux K. Ziehl-Roux K. Ziehl-Roux K. Ziehl-Roux

Signature

Project number 20527 20527 20527 20527

Report number Rev 1 Rev 2 Rev 3 Rev 3A

File reference

iv

CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSPWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527July 2016 Confidential

P R O D U C T I O N T E A MCLIENT

Western Cape Government Mark Munro

WSP | PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF

Lead Consultant Kathy Ziehl-Roux

1

CONRADIE BLMEP SERVICES IMPACT ASSESSMENT WSP | Parsons BrinckerhoffWESTERN CAPE GOVERNMENT - TRANSPORT AND PUBLIC WORKS Project No 20527Confidential July 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 3

1.1 LIVE WORK PLAY VISION ............................................................................ 3

1.2 PHASING AND BUILDING TYPES / USE ....................................................... 4

1.3 METHODOLOGY............................................................................................ 5

2 SERVICES.................................................................................... 6

2.1 STORMWATER .............................................................................................. 6

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................ 8

2.2 POTABLE WATER ......................................................................................... 8

WATER DEMANDS ........................................................................................ 8IMPACTS ........................................................................................................ 9CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................ 9

2.3 WASTEWATER / SEWAGE RETICULATION AND TREATMENT .................. 9WASTEWATER FLOWS ................................................................................. 9IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 10CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 12

2.4 ELECTRICITY .............................................................................................. 12IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 12

2.5 SOLID WASTE ............................................................................................. 14

IMPACTS ...................................................................................................... 14CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 14

2.6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................................... 14

2.7 COSTING ..................................................................................................... 15

2


A P P E N D I X A COCT FLOODLINES

A P P E N D I X B COCT STORM EVENTS INFORMATION

A P P E N D I X C PROPOSED STORMWATER CANAL LAYOUT

A P P E N D I X D PROPOSED LAND USE, BUILDINGS AND BULK

A P P E N D I X E ESTIMATED FUTURE WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL ANDSOLID WASTE DEMANDS

A P P E N D I X F EXISTING WATER NETWORK LAYOUT

A P P E N D I X G EXISTING SEWER NETWORK LAYOUT

A P P E N D I X H SERVICES COST ESTIMATE

A P P E N D I X I CORRESPONDENCE WITH COCT

A P P E N D I X J CORRESPONDENCE WITH COCT SOLID WASTEDEPARTMENT

A P P E N D I X K LIST OF CORRESPONDENCE AND MEETINGS

A P P E N D I X L CONRADIE BLEMP SITE LOCALITY PLAN

A P P E N D I X M CONRADIE BLEMP PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENTLAYOUT

3


1 INTRODUCTIONThe Conradie BLMEP should address the apartheid spatial planning legacies and establish key,replicable levers to unlock state property. The project aims to develop the Conradie BLMEP intoan integrated place where people can live, work and play.

The Department has set 1 April 2018 as the latest date for “sod-turning” and aims to deliver on itsmandate with maximum integration and support of other government departments and the City ofCape Town.

The development is expected to deliver the following outcomes:

à It must result in a changed social and economic role for the community

à It must allow for the development of a suitable housing model, that is replicable and viable

à It should facilitate an effective and efficient government response

à It should have a number of characteristics that position it as “class leading” if not “best inclass”

1.1 LIVE WORK PLAY VISION

As an identified Game Changer project, a Vision was developed for the Conradie BLMEP thatdistinguishes it from “business as usual” for the Western Cape Government (WCG), as part of theTerms of Reference (ToR) for the project.

This Vision statement was unpacked in the Expanded Live, Work Play Vision Report (October2015), using a touchstone concept. This touchstone: The Urban Game Changer, includesPEOPLE and PROCESS, balanced with a sense of PLACE in this project. The elements relevantto services and infrastructure are mentioned below.

à A High-Density, High-Rise, residentially led development

à A Safe and Secure environment

à An open space system integrated with storm water attenuation, with well-designed amenitiesfor active and passive recreational needs.

à Bringing government and public services closer to the people where possible

à Implementation of alternative technologies if technically viable and financially feasible

à Use of cost savings through volume procurement, modern methods of construction, assetmanagement processes and reduction of life cycle costs

The expanded vision for the BLMEP site, based on extensive research, was defined as:

The Vision is to “develop the BLMEP site beyond the current amalgam of housing andcommercial activities into an integrated place where people can live, work and play in a diverse,connected and socially inclusive space.

The Conradie BLMEP will demonstrate sustainability in relation to the beauty of green and bluespaces…. and attract investors.

It will demonstrate sustainability in relation to … the water and energy resources required forgrowth…. the diversity and the resources which citizens and businesses recycle”.

4


1.2 PHASING AND BUILDING TYPES / USE

The proposed phasing was established taking into account the existing services such as possiblewater connections, stormwater management plans and was developed with input from the wholeproject team. The phasing of the project was established and the proposed phases can be seenin Error! Reference source not found.. The type of development, shown in Error! Referencesource not found., has been proposed as a residentially led development with mixed usecommercial, mixed use courtyards, community facilities, heritage buildings and educationalfacilities.

Figure 1: Proposed phasing of development

Figure 2: Building types and use

5


1.3 METHODOLOGY

“CSIR Guidelines for Human Settlement Planning and Design” compiled under the patronage ofthe Department of Housing by the CSIR, Division of Building Technology, dated 2000 (Red Book)was used as the basis for all design criteria. Furthermore, the flowing guidelines were taken intoconsideration when assessing the impacts of each service.

à SANS 10252-1:2004 Edition 2 Water Supply and Drainage for Buildings

à SANS 10400-XA Energy Usage in Buildings

à Management of Urban Stormwater Impacts Policy ,2009

à South African National Standards 10103:2008

à Floodplain and River Corridor Management Policy, 2009

The land uses, shown in Error! Reference source not found., were used to determine theexpected demands from the future development.

WSP used final phase development figures to determine the impact on municipal infrastructure inthe area and surrounding community as this would have the highest demands and would providethe “worst-case” scenario to ensure a safe but effective design of services.

The final land use figures for the development can be seen below in Table 1. Refer to Appendix Dfor a complete description of the land use, buildings and bulk for each phase of the development.

Table 1: Land use figures

OTHER USES (m²)RESIDENTIAL (du)

PARK

ING

(bay

s)

OPE

NSP

ACE

(m²)

GRANT FUNDEDHOUSING

RESI

DEN

TIAL

1

RESI

DEN

TIAL

2

RESI

DEN

TIAL

3

TOTA

LRES

IDEN

TIAL

LAN

DAR

EA(m

²)

TOTA

LBU

LK

TOTA

LGLA

FACI

LITI

ES

RETA

IL

OFF

ICE

TOTA

L

SOCI

ALHO

USI

NG

FLIS

P

REN

T-TO

-BU

Y

TOTA

L

2200

00

2049

48

1752

39

5859

9520

1471

4

2817

8

1263

361

180

1805

359

1260

181

3605

2772

5387

5

The demands for each service will be discussed in the relevant sections but reference can bemade to Appendix E for a complete breakdown of the expected demands for each phase and thefinal development.

6


2 SERVICES

2.1 STORMWATERThe proposed Conradie site is located within a high risk flood area. The existing 1:20, 1:50 and1:100 year flood lines covers most of the proposed site and can be seen in Figure 3 as dottedlines. See Appendix A for enlarged layout. The diagrams indicating flows for each flood event,provided by CoCT, can be seen in Appendix B.

From the information provided by the City of Cape Town, the existing flood volumes for thedifferent intensity storms can be tabled as following:

Table 2: Peak flood values for storm events

The development of the proposed Conradie site would have increased these volumes, andsubsequently worsened the possible flooding of the surrounding area.

WSP used the Conradie site development opportunity to improve (with the assistance of CoCTStormwater Department) the overall stormwater impact for the surrounding area by suggestingthe diversion of the existing Elsieskraal concrete canal through the proposed development and toimprove the peak stormwater flow in the canal.

Stormwater detention ponds are required to detain and for release into the canal system at anappropriate rate to prevent backwater effects at the current culvert restriction at Jan Smuts Drive.The development will provide 51 800 m2 stormwater detention area, which is sufficient to detainthe 1:100 post development stormwater runoff, as well as accommodate the 1:100 yearbackwater effects currently experienced at the Jan Smuts Drive culvert crossing.

The detention areas (red hatch) as well as the new improved flood lines are shown in Figure 3.

FLOOD INTERVAL (1: YEAR) PEAK FLOOD (M3/S)

1 : 5 70

1 : 10 80

1 : 20 90

1 : 100 115

7


Figure 3: Proposed Re-alignment and additional storage

The proposed flood plain / canal will have a top width of 30m. The total incoming 1:100 flood is115m3/s, and the existing infrastructure, i.e. the canal and the culverts at Jan Smuts Drive canonly accommodate 110m3/s. The development would therefore detain the additional 5 m3/s whichcannot be accommodated by the existing infrastructure. This additional 5 m3/s will be control-released from the detention pond.

Post development runoff from the proposed fully developed site will add an additional 6m3/s to the1:100 year peak flow. This peak flow storm together with the 5m3/s, as discussed above will beaccommodated on site in the proposed detention facilities. A total of 51 800 m2 (1:100) and 25400 m2 (1:20) will be available for detention dams.

The proposed flood plain across the site will have a 30 m stormwater servitude and should bejointly maintained by the City of Cape Town and the development management The proposedcross-section and flow depths of the different storm flows are indicated below. The proposed re-aligned canal will have a capacity of 130m3/s.

1,7

8


Figure 4: Proposed Stormwater Canal Cross-Section indicating flow depths for each Storm event

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSThe diversion of the canal and additional storage space created through this development willhave a positive effect on the existing surrounding stormwater infrastructure. The City andDepartment of Water and sanitation have both agreed that they support the intended stormwatermeasures.

The existing canal will only be removed once the new canal and diversion canals are fullyconstructed, therefore the existing stormwater scenario will not be worsened at any stage. WSP isin the process of developing the BLMEP Conradie Storm water Management and MaintenancePlan which will address the City’s current study into upstream storage and possible managementand maintenance plans for the Re-aligned Canal. The stormwater plan will provide a conceptualdesign as well as indicate the phasing of the development of the canal.

2.2 POTABLE WATER

WATER DEMANDSWSP supplied City of Cape Town (CoCT) with high-level expected water demands for theproposed site using an intended land use of 3000 residential dwelling units. Updated layouts andland use types then indicated 3600 residential units and a mixed use land of size 28 450m². WSPcalculated the complete estimated future water demands, including a breakdown of the demandsfor each phase, which can be seen in Appendix E, which reflects the latest figures. The summaryof the water demands for each phase is shown below in Table 3.Table 3: Expected water demands

POTABLE WATER DEMAND (ROUNDED FIGURES)

ERF APPLICATION TOTAL AADD(kl/d) PEAK FLOW (l/s) FIRE FLOW

(l/s)

112657Residential (3605 units) 2,162.0

140 25.0Mixed Use (±28 178 m²) 184.0

Phase 1Residential (1189 units) 713 50 25.0Mixed Use (± 11,892 m²) 97

Phase 2Residential (1696 units) 1017

65 25.0Mixed Use ((± 16,286 m²) 87


25 25.0Mixed Use (0 m²) 0

9


IMPACTS

CoCT confirmed that the site is within the Pinelands PRV water zone and that the surroundingnetwork has sufficient capacity to supply water to the proposed development. There is quite ahigh velocity (1.5m/s) that will be experienced in the distribution main after development and theremay be the need to boost the network under fire conditions

The existing water network, provided by CoCT, is attached in Appendix F and relevantcorrespondence confirming capacities is attached in Appendix I.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CoCT have indicated that there is sufficient capacity to supply the site. There is the possibility ofinadequate supply, in the long-term, as no provision has been made for estimated influx. This isowing to competition from other large developments such as Mupine. There are a number of largescale projects poised for development that may offer similar land uses and compete for servicerequirements. Although there is an indication that the municipal supply is sufficient, theSustainability Impact Report analyses water saving practices which reduce the demand on themunicipal supply and these should be considered during the detail design of the project.

Insufficient water pressure was previously experienced on site and therefore the ConradieHospital installed water towers. This can now be rectified with a new/correctly sized connection tothe municipal bulk supply which will increase the water pressure. Multi-storey buildings couldpossibly need to incorporate high level storage, in favour of boosters, to supply sufficient pressureon the upper levels as well as managing the demand and minimising costs.

2.3 WASTEWATER / SEWAGE RETICULATION AND TREATMENT

WASTEWATER FLOWSWSP supplied City of Cape Town (CoCT) with high-level expected waste water flows for theproposed site using an intended land use of 3000 residential dwelling units and an assumptionthat 70% of the water demand will result in wastewater. Updated layouts and land use types thenindicated 3600 residential units and a mixed use land of size 28 450m². A summary of theupdated sewer flows can be seen in Table 4. Refer to Appendix E for the complete estimatedfuture sewer demands for the site, including a breakdown of the phasing demands.

10


Table 4: Expected Sewer flows

POTABLE WATER DEMAND (rounded numbers) SEWER FLOWS

ERF APPLICATIONTotalAADD(kl/d)

Peak Flow(l/s)

Total Adwf(kl/d)

Peak Flow(Dry WeatherPf=3.5) (l/s)

112657Residential (3605 units) 2,162.0

1401514

67Mixed Use (±28 178 m²) 184.0 129

Phase 1Residential (1189 units) 713 50 500

23Mixed Use (± 11,892 m²) 97 68


65712

32Mixed Use ((± 16,286 m²) 87 61


25302

12Mixed Use (0 m²) 0 0

IMPACTS

The site drains to the Northern Area sewer which CoCT indicated had no spare capacity. CoCTinformed us with written correspondence (Appendix I) dated January 2016, that a new NorthernArea bulk sewer line was being constructed and, once completed, will have spare capacity toaccommodate the expected waste water flows from the proposed development. It has since beenestablished that the new Northern Area Sewer has been commissioned and the development cantherefore be accommodated on this new line. The existing sewer network, provided by CoCT, isattached in Appendix G.

Figure 5 below indicates the site’s possible connection to the municipal bulk main which drains tothe Langa Pumpstation and is then pumped to the Athlone Waste Water Treatment Works. Thisconnection will need to be completed during Phase 1 so that sewage from the Phase 1development can be directed to the Langa PS

11


Figure 5: Possible Municipal Sewer connection

An internal gravity and pumped system will convey sewage from each area in the Conradiedevelopment towards the municipal connection. Detail design will reveal whether or not theexisting sewer line which crosses the canal, seen in Figure 6, can be used. The location of theconnection, with regards to the new stormwater plan, could possibly necessitate a new sewer lineto connect the sewage from the northern area of the development to the new Northern Areasewer.

The internal costing has made allowance for sewage to be pumped from the site across the canal.

12


Figure 6: Existing Sewer Network (diagram received from CoCT)


As mentioned in the Sustainability Impact Report there are certain initiatives which can reduce thevolumes of wastewater needed to be stored, conveyed and treated. With the increased capacityof the municipal sewer, on-site storage is not necessary and the future volumes can beaccommodated with the new line. The final construction programme for each development phasewill need to be discussed with Kevin Samson, Manager of the CoCT Waste Water Department, tonegotiate facility operational adjustments to accommodate the expected flows to the AthloneWaste Water Treatment Works.

2.4 ELECTRICITY

IMPACTS

A summary of the calculated expected electrical demands can be seen in Table 5. The fullbreakdown of demands into phase and land use can be seen in Appendix E.

13


Table 5: Expected Electrical demands

ELECTRICITY DEMAND (ROUNDED FIGURES)

ERF APPLICATIONRATEPER

UNIT/m²TOTAL kVA

Phase 1Residential (1189 units) 3kVA 4524

Mixed Use (± 11,892 m²) 90VA 745

Phase 2 Residential (1696 units) 3kVA 6896Mixed Use ((± 16,286 m²) 90VA 518

Phase 3Residential (726 units) 3kVA 2992

Mixed Use (0 m²) 1.14

TOTALELECTRICAL

DEMAND15680

CoCT have noted that a main substation located close to the site has sufficient capacity toaccommodate the expected load from the development. CoCT have however stated that the“property owner is required to include in the development, measures to improve energy efficiencyto reduce the consumption of electricity.”

Discussions occurred with Green Cape where information was received from them to adviseenergy reduction measures and performance indicators and standards. Appendix K evidencesrelevant correspondence with Green Cape. Possible energy reduction initiatives have beenassessed in the Sustainability Impact Report (WSP, 2016), and the recommended options willneed to be discussed with the relevant stakeholders to establish which initiatives will beimplemented to reduce the demand on the municipal supply.

CoCT indicated that various substation sites will be required in locations approved by theirdepartment. The locations must be directly accessible from a public road and shall not betraversed by any other services. The road reserve on site must be able to accommodate highvoltage cables.

CoCT have informed WSP that there is an electrical servitude located on the north-easterlyportion of the site. Consultation with the department will need to occur when the area is intendedto be developed.

Appendix I contains comments from CoCT Electrical Department.

14


2.5 SOLID WASTE

IMPACTS

The expected solid waste volumes are summarised below in Table 6 and were calculated usingappropriate estimates for the different land use types1. See Appendix E for a full breakdown of thevolumes generated per phase and land use type.

Table 6: Expected Solid Waste Volumes

ERF APPLICATION Tons/day Total Tons/day

112657Residential (3605 units) 10.79

11.54Mixed Use (±28 178 m²) 0.75

Phase 1Residential (1189 units) 4.05

4.35Mixed Use (± 11,892 m²) 0.31


4.87Mixed Use ((± 16,286 m²) 0.45


2.32Mixed Use (0 m²) 0

It has been indicated by Green Cape that in 2014 the recovery rate in the Western Cape was 40%for glass, 60% for paper and 18% for plastic2. Theoretically, only 10-20% of waste cannot berecycled. This could equate to, approximately, an 85% reduction in waste that needs to betransported to landfills.

CoCT have indicated that ARTS is currently experiencing large volumes of waste. The removal ofwaste is constrained by the Transnet siding length and the Metrorail operations. This prohibitsmore than 1000 tons a day being removed. CoCT does have plans to upgrade and improve theefficiency of ARTS but there is no specific timeline foreseen.

As no formal comments have been received from CoCT Solid Waste Department attached, inAppendix J, is the email correspondence received from them.


It is recommended that on-site sorting be implemented to reduce the load on ARTS. TheRecyclables and waste should be collected and transferred to a central point on the site boundarywhere the municipality can collect and take to ARTS. The central points could be in the form ofRecycling Igloos, which only need to be emptied monthly, and paper collection centres protectedfrom wind and rain.

2.6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The traffic component is being covered in a separate Traffic Impact Assessment report.

1 Feasibility Study for Alternative and Sustainable Infrastructure for Settlements Phase 3: Infrastructure andTechnology Review, Aurecon South Africa Pty Ltd, 2015

2 Green Cape Waste Economy 2015 Market intelligence Report

15


2.7 COSTING

Table 7 and Table 8 on the following page indicate preliminary cost estimates for the bulk andinternal services respectively. The full cost breakdown is attached in Appendix H.

Table 7: Bulk services cost estimate

EXTERNAL ROADS & BULK SERVICES

BULK/ EXTERNAL SERVICES COST

Studies required for external Roads and Stormwater R 350 000

Flood Relief / Storm Water - Design R 8 500 000

Flood Relief / Storm Water - Construction R 70 000 000

Earthworks for flood relief - Construction R 15 000 000

Sewer - Design R 2 250 000

Sewer - Construction R 12 750 000

BULK / EXTERNAL ROADS COST

Aerodrome Route location Study R 500 000

Design Odin Road and Aerodrome Road Extensions R 16 600 000

Construct Odin Bridge R 39 000 000

Construct Odin Road R 30 500 000

Construction: Forrest Drive Extension upgrades (turning lanes, etc) R 4 000 000

Construct- Aerodrome Road Extension R 34 000 000

Construct- Aerodrome Bridge R 44 200 000

Construct- Aerodrome Bridge Electrical cable relocation allowance R 12 000 000

Construct- Fencing R 3 500 000

Total Estimated Design and Construction Costs R 293 150 000Summary of Design & Construction Costs Design Costs R 28 200 000

Construction Costs R 264 950 000

Table 8: Internal services cost estimate

INTERNAL SERVICES

ESTIMATED COST (D&C ex Vat) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 TOTALS

ROADS & CIVIL SERVICES

Site Clearance & Earthworks R 4 780 550 R 4 485 232 R 1 763 160 R 11 028 942

Roads R 23 089 783 R 25 416 315 R 9 991 241 R 58 497 339

Services R 25 463 527 R 17 112 181 R 6 726 857 R 49 302 565

LANDSCAPING R 4 800 000 R 4 500 000 R 4 500 000 R 13 800 000

FENCING R 1 200 000 R - R - R 1 200 000

ELECTRICAL R 13 300 000 R 13 000 000 R 8 700 000 R 35 000 000

R 72 633 860 R 31 681 258 R 64 513 728 R 168 828 846

1


Appendix ACOCT FLOODLINES

#

#

∃

∃

%

%

%104#&+∋5+6∋

ΜΟ

ΜΟ

ΜΟ

1ΗΗΥΓς 5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ

1ΗΗΥΓς

5ΘΩΤΕΓ∋ΝΓΞΧςΚΘΠ


1ΗΗΥΓς





1ΗΗΥΓς



1ΗΗΥΓς



1ΗΗΥΓς


1ΗΗΥΓς


1ΗΗΥΓς


1ΗΗΥΓς


1ΗΗΥΓς



1ΗΗΥΓς


1ΗΗΥΓς


1ΗΗΥΓς


1ΗΗΥΓς


1ΗΗΥΓς



1ΗΗΥΓς


5∋%6+10##

5∋%6+10∃∃

5∋%6+10%%

;∋#4(.11&.+0∋

;∋#4(.11&.+0∋

;∋#4(.11&.+0∋

.∋)∋0&

&4#9+0)56#675

%.+∋06

#4%∗+6∋%6

6+6.∋

5%#.∋∀# %∗∋%−∋& #22418∋&

&4#90 &#6∋

241,∋%60Θ &4#9+0)0Θ 4∋8

241,∋%6

&∋5+)0

−<4 −<4

,5

%104#&+∋)#/∋%∗#0)∋4

%1%6(.11&.+0∋5

% #

4∋8 &#6∋ ∃; &∋5%4+26+10 %∗− #2&

# +0+6+#.+557∋

%12;4+)∗64∋5∋48∋&%6ϑΓΕΘΠςΓΠς ΘΗςϑΚΥΦΘΕΩΟΓΠςΚΥΡΤΚΞΚΝΓΙΓΦΧΠΦΕΘΠΗΚΦΓΠςΚΧΝΧΠΦΟΧ[ΠΘς∆ΓΦΚΥΕΝΘΥΓΦΘΤΤΓΡΤΘΦΩΕΓΦΨΚςϑΘΩςςϑΓΓΖΡΤΓΥΥΧΩςϑΘΤΚΥΧςΚΘΠΘΗςϑΓΧΩςϑΘΤ∆ΓΚΠΙ952)4172#(4+%#26;.6&

+ΗΦΤΧΨΚΠΙΥςΧςΩΥ ΕΘΠΥςΤΩΕςΚΘΠΧΥΚΙΠΓΦΕΘΡ[ΘΗςϑΚΥΦΤΧΨΚΠΙΓΚςϑΓΤΚΠϑΧΤΦΕΘΡ[ΘΤΓΝΓΕςΤΘΠΚΕΗΘΤΟΧςΚΥΧΞΧΚΝΧ∆ΝΓΧςςϑΓΘΗΗΚΕΓΘΗΘΤΚΙΚΠΧΠΦΧςςϑΓΘΗΗΚΕΓΘΗΚΥΥΩΓ

24∋.+/+0#4;

240Θ

2.16&#6∋2/

6∋/2.#6∋8∋45+10

ΤΦ(ΝΘΘΤ9ΧΝΓ5ς%ΧΡΓ6ΘΨΠ21∃ΘΖ%ΧΡΓ6ΘΨΠ

6ΓΝ(ΧΖΨΨΨΨΥΡΙΤΘΩΡΕΘ∴Χ

952)ΤΘΩΡ#ΗΤΚΕΧ2ς[.ςΦ&ΓΞΓΝΘΡΟΓΠς6ΤΧΠΥΡΘΤςΧςΚΘΠΧΠΦ+ΠΗΤΧΥςΤΩΕςΩΤΓ

%#&(+.∋0#/∋<

>

>%ΘΠΤΧΦΚΓ)ΧΟ

Γ%ϑΧΠΙΓ

Τ2ΤΘΛΓΕς>%

ΚΞΚΝΥ>&ΤΧΨΚΠΙΥ>&ΤΧΨΚΠΙΥ>&9)5∗∋∋65

>%Α4∋8#ΦΨΙ

1


Appendix BCOCT STORM EVENTS INFORMATION

ZABV03197

Text Box

1:5 year Flow volumes (m³/s)

ZABV03197

Text Box


1


Appendix CPROPOSED STORMWATER CANAL LAYOUT

Railway line

JanSm

uts DriveM

16(M

R149)

Ode

nW

a y

Cana

l

3349169124

3350

2161

3079

3116

3132

112655

112643

Mupine Training College

±766m²

Anfield Village

112625

Viking/ Thor C

rescent

Forest Drive Ext.

Mutual Golf Course

3238153550

158779

158780

158774

158818

158784

158781

161677161676161675

158782

161674

161696

161692161693

161695161694

161721

163294

163295

163296

163293163292

163291

163297

163298

163299

163300

163301

163302

163303

163304

163305

163306

163307

163308

163309

164081

164082164083164084

163310

164085164086

164087

164088

164089

164090

164091

164092

164093

164105164106

164094

2151

164095164104

112658

164096 164103164102164097

3237

164098

164099164100

164101 779

164116

158773

780781

3236

Orthopedic Centre

3065

Anfield Village

±20m

Old StormWater

RetentionPond

Oden

Way

0 50 100 M

DRAWING STATUS:

CLIENT:

ARCHITECT:

TITLE:

SCALE @ A0 : CHECKED: APPROVED:

DRAWN: DATE:

PROJECT No: DRAWING No: REV:

PROJECT:

DESIGN:

KZR KZR

JS 2016/02/25####

####

####

CONRADIE GAME CHANGER

BASE PLAN

20527 C1001 A

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION CHK APD

1:1000

A - - INITIAL ISSUE - -

COPYRIGHT RESERVEDCThe content o f this document is privileged and confident ia l and may not be disclosed or reproducedwithout the express authorisation of the author, being "WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD"

If drawing status = construction, a signed copy of this drawing (either in hardcopy orelectronic format) is available at the office of origin and at the office of issue.

PRELIMINARY

PR No.:

TEMP LATE VERSION 1.1

3rd Floor 35 Wale St. Cape Town 8000PO Box 2613 Cape Town 8000

Tel: +27(0)21-481-8700 Fax: +27(0)21-481-8799 www.wspgroup.co.za

WSP Group Africa (Pty) LtdDevelopment, Transportation and Infrastructure

CA

DF

ILE

NA

ME

:Z:\2

000

0-2

099

9\2

052

7-C

onr

adie

Gam

eC

hang

erP

roje

ct\3

.Civ

ils\3

-D

raw

ings

\3.3

Dra

win

gs\D

WG

SHEE

TS

\20

527-

C10

01_R

EVA

.dw

g

- --

EXISTING CANALTOBE CLOSED

PROPOSED NEW30M STORMWATERRESERVE

AREA EARMARKEDFOR DETENTION

115 m3/s(1:100)

110 m3/s(1:100)

5 m3/s(1:100)

110 m3/s(1:100)

1


Appendix DPROPOSED LAND USE, BUILDINGS AND BULK

CONRADIE UNIT & BULK YIELD : DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONCEPT

Bulk = 17% Bulk = 104%

Soci

al

Hou

sing

FLIS

P

Ren

t-to-

Buy

Sub-

Tota

l

Res

iden

tial 1

(Ave

45m

2)

Res

iden

tial 2

(A

ve 5

8m2)

Res

iden

tial 3

(A

ve 8

0m2)

Sub-

Tota

l

Factors m2 m2 m2 m2 m2 m2 m2 m2 70% 20% 10% Units Units Units Units Units 4/100 4/100 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Phase A 65025 84570 72558 1904 1913 4148 5840 11892 496 142 71 708 96 336 48 480 1189 166 234 354 48 168 24 994Phase B 80350 120378 102681 2040 0 5372 8874 16286 554 158 79 792 180 633 91 904 1696 215 355 396 90 316 45 1418Phase C 20750 43530 37001 0 0 0 0 213 61 30 304 83 291 42 416 720 0 0 152 41 146 21 360

OPEN SPACE 53875 (Excluding Roads) Residential Density (Du/Ha) = 164

Total 220000 204948 175239 3944 1913 9520 14714 28178 1263 361 180 1805 359 1260 181 1800 3605 381 589 902 179 630 91 2772

Note 1: Total Land Area does not include existing Canal Land area although it is required for some of the parking provision Reduced Parking req as per TIA Methodology

Note 2: Reduced Parking requirement is different number from TIA as this Yield Table is revised after input from TIA (Same methodology is used) 90% of Retail & Office shared with Residential

38 59 902 179 630 91 1899

Faci

litie

s

(Hal

l, A

dmin

Offi

ce,

Spor

ts H

all)

213078Other Uses

35400Parking

SUMMARY: SCHEME 3c

LAND AREA

Tota

l Bul

k

Tota

l GLA

Faci

litie

s

(2 S

choo

ls)

Ret

ail a

nd S

ervi

ce

Indu

stry

(GLA

)

Res

iden

tial 2

(B

ays

per U

nit)

Rei

dent

ial 3

(B

ays

per U

nit)

Offi

ce (G

LA)

Tota

l GLA

(O

ther

Use

s)

Tota

l Res

iden

tial

Uni

ts

Private Market Units

Tota

l Par

king

Bay

s R

eq (B

efor

e re

duct

ion)Grant Funded Housing

(Ave 43m2)

Residential

Ret

ail P

arki

ng B

ays

Req

(Bay

s pe

r 100

m2 )

Offi

ce P

arki

ng B

ays

Req

(Bay

s pe

r 100

m2 )

Soci

al H

ousi

ng

(Bay

s pe

r Uni

t)

Res

iden

tial 1

(B

ays

per U

nit)

1


Appendix EESTIMATED FUTURE WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL ANDSOLID WASTE DEMANDS

WATER PEAKFLOW (l/s)

SEWER PEAK DRYWEATHER FLOW

(l/s)PHASE A land Area (m²) Units l/day l/day AADD (l/s) l/day l/s PF = 5 PF = 3.5Facilities 3817 15 57255 0.66 40078.5 0.46 3.31 1.62Retail 4148 4 16592 0.19 11614.4 0.13 0.96 0.47Office 5840 4 23360 0.27 16352 0.19 1.35 0.66Residential 1189 600 713400 8.26 499380 5.78 41.28 20.23Parking 994TOTAL PHASE A 46.91 22.99



(l/s)PHASE B land Area (m²) Units l/day l/day AADD (l/s) l/day l/s PF = 5 PF = 3.5Facilities 2040 15 30600 0.35 21420 0.25 1.77 0.87Retail 5372 4 21488 0.25 15041.6 0.17 1.24 0.61Office 8874 4 35496 0.41 24847.2 0.29 2.05 1.01Residential 1696 600 1017600 11.78 712320 8.24 58.89 28.86Public open spaces 53875 15 15000 0.17 10500 0.12 0.87 0.43Parking 1418TOTAL PHASE C 64.83 31.76



(l/s)PHASE C land Area (m²) Units l/day l/day AADD (l/s) l/day l/s PF = 5 PF = 3.5Facilities 0 15 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Retail 0 4 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Office 0 4 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00Residential 720 600 432000 5.00 302400 3.50 25.00 12.25Parking 360TOTAL PHASE B 25.00 12.25

TOTAL 136.74 67.00

POTABLE WATER FOUL SEWER

ESTIMATED FUTURE WATER AND SEWER DEMANDS



PHASE A land Area (m²) Units Unit Generation rate ton/dayFacilities 1932 kg/1000m²/day 34 0.07Retail 4148 kg/1000m²/day 24 0.10Office 5840 kg/1000m²/day 24 0.14Residential 1265 kg/person/day 0.8 4.05Parking 994TOTAL PHASE A 4.35

PHASE B land Area (m²) Units Unit Generation rate ton/dayFacilities 0 kg/1000m²/day 34 0Retail 0 kg/1000m²/day 24 0Office 0 kg/1000m²/day 24 0Residential 726 kg/person/day 0.8 2.32Parking 397TOTAL PHASE B 2.32

PHASE C land Area (m²) Units Unit Generation rate ton/dayFacilities 3094 kg/1000m²/day 34 0.11Retail 5440 kg/1000m²/day 24 0.13Office 8874 kg/1000m²/day 24 0.21Residential 1382 kg/person/day 0.8 4.42Public open spaces 53875Parking 1382TOTAL PHASE C 4.87

ESTIMATED FUTURE SOLID WASTE VOLUMES

20527 - Conradie Game ChangerDevelopment Cost CalculationsSocial Housing (Grant Funded Housing)

Phase No of UnitsPer ERFContribution

Total Load(kVA)

1 708 3 2124 21242 792 3 2376 23763 304 3 912 912

Private Residential

Phase No of Units kVA/unitTotal Load(kVA)

1 480 5 2400 24002 904 5 4520 45203 416 5 2080 2080

Offices

Phase Area (sqm) VA/sqmTotal Load(kVA) DIV Factor

DIV Load(kVA)

1 5840 75 438 0.7 306.62 8874 0 0 0.7 03 0 75 0 0.7 0

Retail/Commercial


DIV Load(kVA)

1 4148 120 497.76 0.8 398.2082 5372 120 644.64 0.8 515.7123 0 100 0 0.8 0

Facilities (School, Hall, Clinic, etc.)


DIV Load(kVA)

Hall and School 1 3817 20 76.34 0.5 38.172 2040 0 0 0.5 0

School 3 0 40 0 0.5 0

Street Lighting


DIV Load(kVA)

1 1600 2 3.2 1 3.22 1450 2 2.9 1 2.93 570 2 1.14 1 1.14

Totals 15677.93

1


Appendix FEXISTING WATER NETWORK LAYOUT

Site Boundary

Checked By: S. Manie

Date: 08 October 2015

Done By: M.Adonis


Requested By: WSP Group


Project Title: Erf 112657

Drawing Title: Existing Water Network

Notes/Legend

Head (m)Head ( m ) <=0.0 m0.0 m < Head ( m ) <=16.0 m16.0 m < Head ( m ) <=20.0 m20.0 m < Head ( m ) <=45.0 m45.0 m < Head ( m ) <=60.0 m60.0 m < Head ( m ) <=90.0 m90.0 m < Head ( m )

Diameter 160.00 mm

Flow 1.82 l/s

Velocity 0.09 m/sDiameter 160.00 mm

Flow 2.00 l/s


Flow 2.24 l/s

Velocity 0.11 m/s

Diameter 160.00 mm

Flow 1.68 l/s

Velocity 0.08 m/s

Diameter 160.00 mm

Flow 2.24 l/s

Velocity 0.11 m/s

Diam

eter

110.0

0 mm

Flow 0.

40 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

04 m

/s

Diameter 110.00 mm

Flow 2.56 l/s

Velocity 0.27 m/s

Diameter 110.00 mm

Flow 1.56 l/s

Velocity 0.16 m/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 4.33 l/s

Velocity 0.25 m/s

Dia

meter 100.00 m

m

Flow 0.23 l/s

Velocity 0.03 m

/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.51 l/s

Velocity 0.07 m/s

Diamete

r 100

.00 m

m

Flow 0.

14 l/

s

Velocity 0.

02 m

/sDiameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.52 l/s

Velocity 0.07 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.34 l/s

Velocity 0.04 m/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.18 l/s

Velocity 0.02 m

/s Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.06 l/s

Velocity 0.01 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mmFlow 0.65 l/sVelocity 0.08 m/s Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 0.70 l/s

Velocity 0.04 m/s

Diam

eter 150.00 mm

Flow 0.52 l/s

Velocity 0.03 m

/s

Dia

met

er 1

50.0

0 m

mFl

ow 1

.02

l/sV

eloc

ity 0

.06

m/s

Diam

eter 160.00 mm

Flow 6.27 l/s

Velocity 0.31 m/s

Dia

meter 150.00 m

m

Flow 0.03 l/s

Velocity 0.00 m

/s

Dia

meter 150.00 m

m

Flow 6.30 l/s

Velocity 0.36 m

/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 0.00 l/s

Velocity 0.00 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.00 l/s

Velocity 0.00 m/s

Dia

meter 160.00 m

m

Flow 1.92 l/s

Velocity 0.10 m

/s

Diameter 380.00 m

m

Flow 40.67 l/s

Velocity 0.36 m

/s

Diam

eter

160.0

0 mm

Flow 4.

44 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

22 m

/s

Dia

meter 50.00 m

m

Flow 0.00 l/s

Velocity 0.00 m

/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 0.91 l/s


Flow 0.91 l/s


Flow 0.55 l/s

Velocity 0.07 m/s

Dia

meter 100.00 m

m

Flow 0.36 l/s

Velocity 0.05 m

/s

Diameter 160.00 mm

Flow 1.57 l/s

Velocity 0.08 m/s

Diameter 230.00 mm

Flow 24.93 l/s

Velocity 0.60 m/s

Diam

eter

380.0

0 mm

Flow 15

.67 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

14 m

/s

Diam

eter

160.0

0 mm

Flow 4.

40 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

22 m

/s

Diam

eter

160.0

0 mm

Flow 2.

36 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

12 m

/s Diameter 230.00 mm

Flow 23.71 l/s

Velocity 0.57 m/s

Diam

eter

110.0

0 mm

Flow 1.

03 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

11 m

/s

Diam

eter

160.0

0 mm

Flow 1.

59 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

08 m

/s

Diameter 100.00 m

m

Flow 0.12 l/s

Velocity 0.02 m/s

Dia

meter 110.00 m

m

Flow 0.41 l/s

Velocity 0.04 m

/s

Dia

meter 110.00 m

m

Flow 0.39 l/s

Velocity 0.04 m

/s

Dia

meter 110.00 m

m

Flow 0.13 l/s

Velocity 0.01 m

/s

Diam

eter

160.0

0 mm

Flow 0.

91 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

05 m

/sDia

met

er 11

0.00 m

m

Flow 0.

47 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

05 m

/s

Diam

eter

160.0

0 mm

Flow 1.

70 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

08 m

/s

Diam

eter

100.0

0 mm

Flow 0.

71 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

09 m

/s

Diameter 100.00 m

m

Flow 1.02 l/s

Velocity 0.13 m/s

Diam

eter

150.0

0 mm

Flow 2.

44 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

14 m

/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.11 l/s

Velocity 0.01 m

/s

Diamete

r 100

.00 m

m

Flow 0.

82 l/

s

Velocity 0.

10 m

/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.43 l/s

Velocity 0.05 m

/s

Diameter 75.00 mm

Flow 0.16 l/s

Velocity 0.04 m/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.76 l/s

Velocity 0.10 m

/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 1.31 l/s

Velocity 0.17 m

/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 3.20 l/s

Velocity 0.18 m/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 2.43 l/s

Velocity 0.14 m/s

Diameter 150.00 m

m

Flow 2.03 l/s

Velocity 0.12 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.51 l/s

Velocity 0.07 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.49 l/s

Velocity 0.06 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.35 l/s

Velocity 0.04 m/s

Diam

eter 150.00 mm

Flow 0.29 l/s

Velocity 0.02 m

/s

Diameter 380.00 mm

Flow 61.41 l/s

Velocity 0.54 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 7.36 l/s

Velocity 0.94 m/s

Diam

eter 160.00 mm

Flow 7.36 l/s

Velocity 0.37 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.60 l/s

Velocity 0.08 m/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 1.87 l/s

Velocity 0.24 m/s

Diameter 380.00 mm

Flow 51.14 l/s

Velocity 0.45 m/s

Diameter 380.00 mm

Flow 49.27 l/s

Velocity 0.43 m/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.00 l/s

Velocity 0.00 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.60 l/s

Velocity 0.08 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.00 l/s


Flow 0.47 l/s

Velocity 0.06 m/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.14 l/s

Velocity 0.02 m

/s

Dia

meter 50.00 m

m

Flow 3.29 l/s

Velocity 1.67 m

/s

Dia

met

er 1

60.0

0 m

m

Flow

0.4

0 l/s

Velo

city

0.0

2 m

/s

Diameter 150.00 mmFlow 4.09 l/sVelocity 0.23 m/s

Dia

meter 50.00 m

mFlow

0.10 l/sV

elocity 0.05 m/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 0.91 l/s

Velocity 0.05 m/s

Diam

eter

150.0

0 mm

Flow 4.

51 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

26 m

/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 8.60 l/s

Velocity 0.49 m/s


Diam

eter 160.00 mm

Flow 0.00 l/s

Velocity 0.00 m

/s

Diameter 230.00 m

m

Flow 21.84 l/s

Velocity 0.53 m/s

Diam

eter

110.0

0 mm

Flow 1.

39 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

15 m

/s

Diameter 160.00 mm

Flow 0.01 l/s

Velocity 0.00 m/sD

iameter 160.00 m

m

Flow 1.90 l/s

Velocity 0.09 m

/s

Diam

eter 160.00 mm

Flow 0.92 l/s

Velocity 0.05 m

/s

Dia

meter 150.00 m

mFlow

1.58 l/sV

elocity 0.09 m/s

Dia

met

er 1

10.0

0 m

m

Flow

1.1

9 l/s

Vel

ocity

0.1

3 m

/sDia

met

er 10

0.00 m

m

Flow 0.

79 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

10 m

/s

Diam

eter

110.0

0 mm

Flow 0.

53 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

06 m

/s

Dia

meter 230.00 m

m

Flow 22.93 l/s

Velocity 0.55 m

/s

Dia

met

er 1

50.0

0 m

mFl

ow 1

.98

l/sV

eloc

ity 0

.11

m/s

Diameter 100.00 m

m

Flow 1.17 l/s

Velocity 0.15 m/s

Dia

meter 160.00 m

m

Flow 1.96 l/s

Velocity 0.10 m

/s

Diameter 160.00 mm

Flow 5.34 l/s

Velocity 0.27 m/s

Diameter 160.00 mm

Flow 2.13 l/s

Velocity 0.11 m/s

Diameter 100.00 m

m

Flow 0.45 l/s

Velocity 0.06 m/s

Diam

eter

110.0

0 mm

Flow 1.

51 l/

s

Veloc

ity 0.

16 m

/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 0.18 l/s

Velocity 0.01 m/s

Diameter 100.00 m

m

Flow 0.00 l/s

Velocity 0.00 m/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 0.18 l/s

Velocity 0.01 m/s

Diamete

r 150

.00 m

m

Flow 3.

20 l/

s

Velocity 0.

18 m

/s

Diamete

r 150

.00 m

m

Flow 2.

99 l/

s

Velocity 0.

17 m

/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.15 l/s

Velocity 0.02 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.10 l/s

Velocity 0.01 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.95 l/s

Velocity 0.12 m/s

Diamete

r 100

.00 m

m

Flow 0.

85 l/

s

Velocity 0.

11 m

/s

Diamete

r 150

.00 m

m

Flow 1.

92 l/

s

Velocity 0.

11 m

/s

Diamete

r 150

.00 m

m

Flow 1.

77 l/

s

Velocity 0.

10 m

/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.12 l/s

Velocity 0.01 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.49 l/s

Velocity 0.06 m/s

Diamete

r 150

.00 m

m

Flow 1.

43 l/

s

Velocity 0.

08 m

/s

Diameter 100.00 m

m

Flow 0.12 l/s

Velocity 0.01 m/s

Diamete

r 100

.00 m

m

Flow 0.

60 l/

s

Velocity 0.

08 m

/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.26 l/s

Velocity 0.03 m/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.70 l/s

Velocity 0.09 m/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.12 l/s

Velocity 0.02 m/s

Diameter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.36 l/s

Velocity 0.05 m/s

Diam

eter 100.00 mm

Flow 0.31 l/s

Velocity 0.04 m/s

Dia

met

er 1

00.0

0 m

mFl

ow 0

.31

l/sV

eloc

ity 0

.04

m/s


Dia

met

er 1

00.0

0 m

mFl

ow 0

.11

l/sV

eloc

ity 0

.01

m/s

Dia

met

er 1

00.0

0 m

mFl

ow 0

.36

l/sV

eloc

ity 0

.05

m/s

Diameter 150.00 mm

Flow 1.95 l/s

Velocity 0.11 m/s

Scale 1:4318.408

0 75 150 225 300 meters

ALLE INLIGTING SOOS GETOON, MOET OP TERREIN GEVERIFEER WORD VOORDAT ENIGE BEPLANNING

OF KONSTRUKSIE KAN PLASSVIND

ALL INFORMATION SHOWN MUST BE VERIFIED ON SITE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY PLANNING

OR CONSTRUCTION

ZONKE INKCUKACHA EZIBONISWE APHA KUFUNEKA ZIYOKUQINISEKISWA KUMHLABA LOWO

UBANDAKANYEKAYO PHAMBI KOKUQULUNQA OKANYE KUQALWE UMSEBENZI

Figure : 1

1


Appendix GEXISTING SEWER NETWORK LAYOUT

Site Boundary

Notes/Legend

Project Title: Erf 112657

Drawing Title: Existing Sewer Network

Done By: M. Adonis


Checked By: S. Manie


Requested By: WSP Group


ATH_12722

ATH_12730

ATH_12723ATH_12725

ATH_12777

ATH_12776

ATH_12775

ATH_12774

ATH_12651

ATH_12729

ATH_11914

ATH_11913

ATH_11885

ATH_11891

ATH_11879

ATH_11878

ATH_11877

ATH_11881

ATH_11880

ATH_11882

ATH_11901

ATH_11900

ATH_11924

ATH_11923

ATH_11929

ATH_11928

ATH_11927

ATH_11932

ATH_12721

ATH_12720

ATH_11926

ATH_11925

ATH_11940

ATH_11935

ATH_11934

ATH_11938

ATH_11939

ATH_12724

ATH_11936

ATH_11888

ATH_11887

ATH_11886

ATH_11876

ATH_11875

ATH_11874

ATH_06090

ATH_06179

ATH_06178

ATH_06177

ATH_06185

ATH_06159

ATH_06184

ATH_06114

ATH_06115

ATH_06124

ATH_06181

ATH_00215

ATH_00213

ATH_06182

ATH_06143

ATH_06144

ATH_06145

ATH_06146

ATH_06147

ATH_00214

ATH_06183

ATH_06160

ATH_06161

ATH_06162

ATH_06163

ATH_06164

ATH_06176

ATH_06180

ATH_06175

ATH_06174

ATH_06173

ATH_06166

ATH_06165

ATH_06172

ATH_06171

ATH_06170

ATH_06169

ATH_06168

ATH_06167

ATH_00216

ATH_12665

ATH_12664

ATH_11897ATH_11903

ATH_11902

ATH_11896

ATH_11915

ATH_11921

ATH_11920

ATH_11919

ATH_11918

ATH_11917

ATH_11922

ATH_11906

ATH_12667

ATH_12666

ATH_12672

ATH_12671

ATH_12670

ATH_12669

ATH_12668

ATH_12679

ATH_12678

ATH_12677

ATH_12676

ATH_12675

ATH_12680

ATH_12682

ATH_12681

ATH_11893

ATH_11892

ATH_12648

ATH_12647

ATH_12773

ATH_12790

ATH_12684

ATH_12683

ATH_11895

ATH_11894

ATH_11908

ATH_11907

ATH_12688

ATH_11899

ATH_11898

ATH_11916

ATH_11905

ATH_11904

ATH_11909

ATH_11910

ATH_11912

ATH_11911

ATH_11931

ATH_11930

ATH_11933

ATH_12650

ATH_12649

ATH_12687

ATH_12690

ATH_12689

ATH_06112ATH_06111

ATH_06110

ATH_06113

ATH_06103

ATH_06066

ATH_06065

ATH_06108

ATH_06122

ATH_06076

ATH_06075

ATH_06106

ATH_06105

ATH_06064

ATH_06063

ATH_06062

ATH_06077

ATH_06091

ATH_06116

ATH_06117

ATH_06118

ATH_06119

ATH_06120

ATH_06129

ATH_06130

ATH_06127

ATH_06128

ATH_06125

ATH_06126

ATH_06158

ATH_00206

ATH_06121

ATH_06131

ATH_06132

ATH_06133

ATH_06134

ATH_06136

ATH_06137

ATH_06138

ATH_06139

ATH_06142

ATH_06140

ATH_06141

ATH_00209

ATH_00208

ATH_00207

ATH_06150

ATH_06155

ATH_06153

ATH_06154

ATH_06152

ATH_00211

ATH_00210

ATH_06157

ATH_06156

ATH_00212

ATH_06148

ATH_06149

ATH_06151

ATH_06135

ATH_00202

ATH_06058

ATH_06057

ATH_06061

ATH_00203

ATH_06054

ATH_06053

ATH_06052

ATH_06051

ATH_06050

ATH_06045

ATH_06060

ATH_06059

ATH_06109

ATH_00205

ATH_00204

ATH_06049

ATH_06048

ATH_06047

ATH_06046

ATH_06123

ATH_06055

ATH_12663

ATH_12662

ATH_12661

ATH_12660

ATH_12659

ATH_12658

ATH_12673

ATH_12674

ATH_06086

ATH_06085

ATH_06087

ATH_06088

ATH_06992

ATH_06041

ATH_06099

ATH_06098

ATH_06097

ATH_06104

ATH_06074

ATH_06073

ATH_06072

ATH_06084

ATH_06083

ATH_06102

ATH_06101

ATH_06100

ATH_06107

ATH_06082

ATH_06081

ATH_06095

ATH_06094

ATH_06093

ATH_06092

ATH_06031

ATH_06044

ATH_06043

ATH_06056

ATH_06030

MD 15

0.00

DF 11.4

9

IPDW

F 0.01

MD

150.00D

F 11.49IPD

WF 0.01

MD 15

0.00

DF 10.4

5

IPDW

F 0.16

MD 150.00DF 22.45

IPDWF 0.03

MD 15

0.00

DF 23.7

2

IPDW

F 0.05

MD 150.00

DF 15.46

IPDWF 1.43

MD 150.0

0

DF 14.0

8

IPDWF 1.42

MD 150.00

DF 9.32

IPDWF 1.42

MD 150.00

DF 14.58

IPDWF 0.14

MD 150.00

DF 15.17

IPDWF 0.42

MD 15

0.00

DF 22.9

0

IPDW

F 0.08M

D 150.00

DF 16.32

IPDWF 0.27

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.00

MD 150.00DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.13

MD 15

0.00

DF 11.4

9

IPDW

F 0.04

MD

150

.00

DF

29.2

2IP

DW

F 0.

04

MD 150.00

DF 11.14

IPDWF 0.16

MD

150

.00

DF

11.4

9IP

DW

F 0.

00

MD 150.00DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.00

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.01 MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.02

MD 15

0.00

DF 11.4

9IPD

WF 0

.05

MD 150.00

DF 14.98

IPDWF 0.08

MD 15

0.00

DF 15.8

1

IPDW

F 0.11

MD 150.00DF 21.92

IPDWF 0.45

MD

150.00D

F 15.95IPD

WF 0.22

MD 150.00DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.09MD 150.00DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.00

MD 150.00DF 24.43

IPDWF 0.08MD 150.00

DF 11.49IPDWF 0.00

MD

150.00D

F 11.49IPD

WF 0.11

MD 150.00DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.00

MD

150.00D

F 11.49IPD

WF 0.03

MD

225

.00

DF

37.5

0IP

DW

F 0.

94

MD 150.00DF 16.64

IPDWF 0.19

MD

225

.00

DF

39.0

9IP

DW

F 0.

84

MD

150

.00

DF

11.4

9IP

DW

F 0.

02

MD

225

.00

DF

37.4

5IP

DW

F 1.

03

MD

150

.00

DF

48.4

4IP

DW

F 0.

02MD

150

.00

DF

11.4

9IP

DW

F 0.

01

MD 150.00DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.01

MD

750.00D

F 379.26IPD

WF 459.01

MD 150.00

DF 19.12

IPDWF 0.80

MD

750.00D

F 402.86IPD

WF 459.08

MD 150.00

DF 13.00

IPDWF 0.23

MD 150.00

DF 12.96

IPDWF 0.24

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.23

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.23

MD 150.00

DF 15.40

IPDWF 0.62

MD

150.00

DF 6.89

IPDW

F 0.62 MD 150.00

DF 17.07

IPDWF 0.61

MD 150.00

DF 7.62

IPDWF 0.61

MD 150.00

DF 6.49

IPDWF 0.61

MD 150.00

DF 12.99

IPDWF 0.61

MD 150.00DF 13.06

IPDWF 0.61

MD 150.00

DF 12.97

IPDWF 0.61

MD

150.00

DF 12.84

IPDW

F 0.77

MD

750.00D

F 532.51IPD

WF 459.98

MD 150.00

DF 12.82

IPDWF 0.63

MD 150.00

DF 11.30

IPDWF 0.62

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.14

MD

150.00

DF 17.03

IPDW

F 0.00

MD 150.00

DF 13.25

IPDWF 0.23

MD 150.00

DF 13.03

IPDWF 0.19

MD 150.00

DF 12.01

IPDWF 0.18

MD

150.00

DF 9.84

IPDW

F 0.16M

D 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.10

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.10

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.11

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.01

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.17

MD 150.00

DF 38.54

IPDWF 0.04

MD 150.00DF 15.09

IPDWF 0.03

MD

150.00

DF 29.30

IPDW

F 0.06

MD 15

0.00

DF 9.08

IPDW

F 3.86

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.00

MD 30

0.00

DF 52.5

0

IPDW

F 3.97

MD

150.00

DF 14.46

IPDW

F 0.09

MD 150.00DF 28.36

IPDWF 0.16

MD 15

0.00

DF 14.6

0IPD

WF 0

.10

MD 15

0.00

DF 13.4

9

IPDW

F 0.05

MD 150.00DF 14.42

MD 15

0.00

DF 16.3

7

IPDW

F 0.10

MD 15

0.00

DF 11.4

9

IPDW

F 0.02

MD 15

0.00

DF 16.0

0

IPDW

F 0.19

IPDWF 0.16

MD 15

0.00

DF 11.4

9

IPDW

F 0.05

MD 30

0.00

DF 57.4

7

IPDW

F 4.15MD 150.00

DF 23.42

IPDWF 0.15

MD 150.00DF 26.05

IPDWF 0.28

MD 150.00DF 27.59

IPDWF 0.26

MD 30

0.00

DF 27.2

5

IPDW

F 4.90

MD 30

0.00

DF 136

.34

IPDW

F 4.34

MD 150.00

DF 16.65

IPDWF 0.15

MD 150.00

DF 27.68

IPDWF 0.05

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.03

MD 150.00

DF 12.29

IPDWF 0.08

MD 150.00

DF 21.68

IPDWF 0.06

MD

150.00

DF 21.71

IPDW

F 0.05

MD 150.00

DF 21.65

IPDWF 0.05

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.05

MD

150

.00

DF

11.4

9IP

DW

F 0.

00

MD

225.00D

F 45.34IPD

WF 0.20

MD 225.00

DF 48.88

IPDWF 0.18

MD 150.00

DF 39.47

IPDWF 0.02

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.00

MD 225.00

DF 48.90

IPDWF 0.10

MD 225.00

DF 48.91

IPDWF 0.06

MD 1

50.0

0DF 1

1.49

IPDW

F 0.0

2

MD

225.00D

F 45.35IPD

WF 0.25

MD

150.

00DF

39.

18IP

DWF

0.04

MD

225.00D

F 39.09IPD

WF 0.30

MD 150.00DF 15.80IPDWF 0.32

MD 150.00DF 15.62

IPDWF 0.29

MD 150.00

DF 14.65

IPDWF 3.03

MD 150.00

DF 9.82

IPDWF 3.56

MD 150.00

DF 22.12

IPDWF 0.00

MD 150.00

DF 25.91

IPDWF 0.00

MD 150.00

DF 9.31

IPDWF 3.62

MD 150.00

DF 22.50

IPDWF 0.02

MD 150.00

DF 18.30

IPDWF 0.02

MD

150

.00

DF

70.7

5IP

DW

F 0.

01

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.00

MD 15

0.00

DF 7.47

IPDW

F 3.81

MD 150.00

DF 8.05

IPDWF 3.69

MD 150.00

DF 8.11

IPDWF 3.66

MD 150.00

DF 9.16

IPDWF 3.66

MD 150.00

DF 12.68

IPDWF 3.62

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.04

MD

150.00D

F 11.49IPD

WF 0.00

MD 15

0.00

DF 9.44

IPDW

F 3.82

MD 150.00

DF 20.86

IPDWF 1.34

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 1.34

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.11

MD 7

50.0

0DF 4

53.2

1

IPDW

F 458

.80

MD 149.00DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.01

MD 7

50.0

0DF 4

71.0

3

IPDW

F 458

.88

MD

300

.00

DF

113.

14IP

DW

F 0.

09

MD 3

00.0

0DF 9

4.24

IPDW

F 0.0

2

MD 75

0.00

DF 531

.62

IPDW

F 458

.98

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.14

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.32

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.09

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.17

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.08

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.07

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.07

MD 7

50.0

0DF 7

01.7

5

IPDW

F 458

.00

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.75

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.00

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.10MD 149.00DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.10

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.75

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.06

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.00

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.09

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.20

MD 149.00DF 11.33IPDWF 0.25

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.35

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.54

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.12

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.08

MD 7

50.0

0DF 4

66.9

8

IPDW

F 457

.81

MD 7

50.0

0DF 4

78.8

6

IPDW

F 457

.90

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.09

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.03MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.00

IPDW

F 0.07

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.02

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.05

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.62

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.65

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.03

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.03

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.57

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.03MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.00

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.13

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 0.55

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.39

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 1.53

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.02

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.02

MD 15

0.00

DF 11.4

9

IPDW

F 0.04

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 2.82

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.11

MD 150.00DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.11

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.08

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.06

MD

750.

00DF

615

.60

IPDW

F 457

.72

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 2.71

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 1.53

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 2.67

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 1.95

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.12

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 2.16

MD

149.00

DF 11.33

IPDW

F 1.44MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.03

MD

149.00D

F 11.33IPD

WF 1.47

MD 149.00DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.05

MD 149.00DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.00 MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 0.03

MD

150.

00DF

18.

40IP

DWF 3

.00

MD 150.00

DF 10.04

IPDWF 2.98

MD 150.00

DF 9.74

IPDWF 2.98

MD 150.00

DF 8.64

IPDWF 2.97

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.02 MD 1

50.0

0DF 1

1.49

IPDW

F 0.0

2

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.00

MD 750.00

DF 523.70

IPDWF 451.62

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.08

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.12

MD

150.00D

F 11.49IPD

WF 0.02

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.04

MD

750.

00DF

824

.63

IPDW

F 457

.54

MD 750.00

DF 528.37

IPDWF 451.75

MD 150.00

DF 13.99

IPDWF 6.02

MD

150.00D

F 14.68IPD

WF 6.01

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 1.40

MD 15

0.00

DF 11.4

9

IPDW

F 0.13

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.12MD 150.00

DF 74.29

IPDWF 6.06

MD 150.00

MD

750

.00

DF

460.

48IP

DW

F 45

7.63

MD

150.00

DF 11.85

IPDW

F 6.00

MD

150.

00DF

7.6

2IP

DWF 5

.96

MD 225.00

DF 25.84

IPDWF 5.96

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 1.59

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.22

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.19

MD 149.00

DF 11.33

IPDWF 1.55

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.03

MD 150.00

DF 12.06

IPDWF 0.01

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.03

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 1.51

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 1.49

MD 150.00DF 11.49

IPDWF 1.47

MD 150.00

DF 11.06

IPDWF 0.60

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.26

MD 150.00DF 4.80

IPDWF 0.85

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.79

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.11

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.04

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.65

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.56

MD 150.00

DF 12.22

IPDWF 0.05

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.08

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.07

MD 15

0.00

DF 11.4

9

IPDW

F 0.06

MD

150

.00

DF

11.4

9IP

DW

F 0.

04

MD

150

.00

DF

11.4

9IP

DW

F 0.

02

MD 15

0.00

DF 31.0

6

IPDW

F 0.03

MD

150.00

DF 18.23

IPDW

F 0.08

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 0.10

MD

150.00

DF 11.49

IPDW

F 1.81

MD

150.00

DF 12.37

IPDW

F 0.25

MD 150.00

DF 15.60

IPDWF 0.21

MD

150.00

DF 14.73

IPDW

F 0.13

MD 750.00

DF 452.98

IPDWF 451.50

MD 15

0.00

DF 11.4

9

IPDW

F 0.06

MD 150.00

DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.01

MD 150.00DF 11.49

IPDWF 0.02

Scale 1:3911.088

0 50 100 150 200 meters

ALLE INLIGTING SOOS GETOON, MOET OP TERREIN GEVERIFEER WORD VOORDAT ENIGE BEPLANNING

OF KONSTRUKSIE KAN PLASSVIND

ALL INFORMATION SHOWN MUST BE VERIFIED ON SITE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY PLANNING

OR CONSTRUCTION

MD = Modelled Diameter (mm)

DF = Design Flow ( l/s)

IPDWF = Instantaneous peak Dry Weather Flow ( l/s)

Gravity Pipes

Relative Spare Capacity < 0.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 30.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 60.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 90.0%Relative Spare Capacity > 90.0%Rising MainManhole

Pump Structure

MD = Modelled Diameter (mm)

DF = Design Flow ( l/s)

IPDWF = Instantaneous peak Dry Weather Flow ( l/s)

Relative Spare Capacity < 0.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 30.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 60.0%Relative Spare Capacity < 90.0%Relative Spare Capacity > 90.0%Rising Manhole

Pump Structure

ZONKE INKCUKACHA EZIBONISWE APHA KUFUNEKA ZIYOKUQINISEKISWA KUMHLABA LOWO

UBANDAKANYEKAYO PHAMBI KOKUQULUNQA OKANYE KUQALWE UMSEBENZI

Figure : 2

1


Appendix HSERVICES COST ESTIMATE

8 July 2016Rev.10.C

EXTERNAL ROADS & BULK SERVICES

350 000R

8 500 000R

70 000 000R

15 000 000R

2 250 000R

12 750 000R

500 000R

16 600 000R

39 000 000R

30 500 000R

4 000 000R

34 000 000R

44 200 000R

12 000 000R3 500 000R

293 150 000RSummary of Design & Construction Costs 28 200 000R

264 950 000R

ESTIMATED COST (D&C ex Vat) TOTALS

ROADS & CIVIL SERVICES

Site Clearance & Earthworks 11 028 942R

Roads 58 497 339R

Services 49 302 565R

LANDSCAPING 13 800 000R

FENCING 1 200 000RELECTRICAL 35 000 000R

168 828 846R28 973 617R29 173 544R14 886 772R

21/2220/21

1 000 000R -R

Design Odin Road and Aerodrome Road Extensions 3 300 000R 3 300 000R 3 800 000R

-R

Sewer - Construction

-R

-R

-R -R -R

15 000 000R 15 000 000R

2 500 000R 8 300 000R 6 550 000R

-R

4 300 000R 3 800 000R

1 000 000R

30 000 000R 9 000 000R

-R

-R

-R -R -R 20 000 000R

-R

600 000R

-R

-R 4 000 000R -R -R -R

52 050 000R 41 300 000R 48 800 000R 30 100 000R

1 900 000R

45 500 000R 37 000 000R 45 000 000R 28 200 000R

1 920 000R

5 320 000R

CONRADIE "BETTER LIVING MODEL" EXEMPLAR PROJECTCalculations for Funding required for % Grant-funded Housing [Basis: Total Du's = 3603 (Scheme 3C) 49% subsidized]

-R -R 1 500 000R 750 000R -R -R

16/17 19/20

Studies required for external Roads and Stormwater 350 000R -R -R -R

BULK/ EXTERNAL SERVICES COST

-R 1 500 000R 3 500 000R 2 500 000R 1 000 000R

HOUSING AND INTERNAL SERVICES PER FINANCIAL YEAR

Construct- Aerodrome Bridge Electrical cable relocation allowance 12 000 000R

4 500 000R

8 700 000R

31 681 258R

-R 40 000 000R

1 500 000R

-R

1 000 000R

-R

4 800 000R

13 300 000R

4 485 232R

23 089 783R 9 991 241R 25 416 315R

1 900 000R

Flood Relief / Storm Water - Design

-R -R 6 250 000R 6 500 000R -R -R -R

-R

-R

-R -R 10 000 000R 2 500 000REarthworks for flood relief - Construction

-R -R

TOTALS21/22

-R

18/19

2 250 000R

6 500 000R

32 256 864R

20/2117/1815/16

22 292 002R41 246 047R

Sewer - Design

BULK / EXTERNAL ROADS COST

Construction: Forrest Drive Extension upgrades (turning lanes, etc)

INTERNAL SERVICES

4 500 000R

Construction Costs

2 660 000R

960 000R

13 000 000R

72 633 860R 64 513 728R

-R

500 000R

3 300 000R

Construct Odin Bridge

4 780 550R 1 763 160R

Phase 1

Design Costs

2 500 000R 117 550 000R

15/16 16/17

Construct- FencingTotal Estimated Design and Construction Costs

850 000R

850 000R

-R

-R-R1 200 000R 600 000R

3 720 000R 2 700 000R 2 250 000R

8 800 000R 5 650 000R 6 070 000R

18/19 19/20

-R

-R

17/18

-R

-R

Flood Relief / Storm Water - Construction

2 500 000R -R

-R -R -RAerodrome Route location Study

-R-R-R-R-R

Construct Odin Road -R 18 000 000R 12 500 000R -R -R

Construct- Aerodrome Road Extension -R -R

-R

Phase 2 Phase 3

-R 109 250 000R

-R

-R 956 110R 1 912 220R 2 617 484R

25 463 527R 6 726 857R 17 112 181R 5 074 647R 7 517 558R 8 556 091R-R 5 092 705R 10 185 411R 12 876 154R

14 000 000R

Construct- Aerodrome Bridge -R -R -R -R 6 000 000R 24 000 000R 14 200 000R

-R -R -R

1 330 103R 1 970 409R 2 242 616R

4 617 957R 9 235 913R 13 232 410R 7 537 252R 11 165 650R 12 708 157R

-R

1


Appendix ICORRESPONDENCE WITH COCT

www.capetown.gov.za

Making progress possible. Together.

Durbanville Municipal Office Durbanville Municipal Office Durbanville Munisipale KantoorCnr Queen & Oxford Street Cnr Queen & Oxford Street H/V Queen & Oxford StraatDurbanville 7500 Durbanville 7500 Durbanville 7500

Tel: +27 21 444 0739 Umnxeba: +27 21 444 0739 Tel: +27 21 444 0739Fax: +27 21 970 3140 Ifeksi: +27 21 970 3140 Faks: +27 21 970 3140

E-mail: [email protected]

Evaluator: M. Adonis

Ref No : 20151006_Z

14th October 2015

Johan Snyman

WSP Group

Email: [email protected]

COMMENT ON WATER AND SANITATION CAPACITY FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF ERF112657_THORNTON

BackgroundWSP Group have been appointed to obtain confirmation of the available capacity within theexisting network surrounding the proposed site. The intended land use is for 3000 residentialdwelling units.

This letter provides an analysis of the existing water and sewer infrastructure in the vicinity of thedevelopment.

Table 1.1: Water demands and sewer flows as supplied by WSP Group

Potable Water Demand Sewer Flow*

ERF

Number/Portion

Number

ApplicationTotal AADD

(kl/d)

Peak Flow

(l/s)

(PF= 4.0)

Fire Flow

(l/s)

Total ADWF

(kl/d)

Peak Flow

(Dry

weather)

(l/s)

(PF=2.5)

Erf 112657Residential

(3000 units)1725.0 kl/d 79.86 l/s - 1207.50 kl/d* 34.94 l/s

*Based on a 70% sewer flow design criterion

Water ReticulationThe site is situated within the Pinelands PRV water zone.It appears as though the surrounding network has sufficient capacity to supply the proposeddevelopment with 79.86l/s.

www.capetown.gov.za


2

See figure 1 for existing water network layout.

Bulk WaterNo bulk water pipelines or infrastructure under the control of the City of Cape Town’s Bulk WaterBranch exist in by the proposed development shown in the application.

Input regarding the capacity to supply this development has not been received from our BulkWater branch, therefore this comment may be revised upon receiving their input.

Sewer ReticulationThe proposed development drains to the Northern Area sewer which has no spare capacity andexperiences collapses in certain places. The new Northern Area Sewer is at the completion stageof construction and will be commissioned shortly. After commissioning this bulk sewer will havesufficient capacity to accommodate this development.

See figure 2 for existing sewer network.

WastewaterThe anticipated wastewater flow from the proposed development has been calculated to be1207.50kl/d.

This proposed development is situated within the catchment of the Athlone WastewaterTreatment Works (WWTW). The treatment plant has insufficient unallocated capacity to handlethe anticipated wastewater from this development. The Cape Flats 3 bulk sewer is beingconstructed which will allow diversion from Athlone WWTW to the Cape Flats WWTW which isexpected to be completed by June 2018.

The developer is required to provide a construction programme that is negotiated with theManger of the Waste Water branch, Mr. Kevin Samson. This negotiated programme will be used tofacilitate operational adjustments at Athlone if required.

ConclusionThere is sufficient capacity within the existing water network to accommodate the proposeddevelopment. This development can only proceed once the Northern Areas Sewer iscommissioned. The timing and budgeting for the implementation of upgrades to the sewerreticulation network as well as the WWTW will have to be confirmed with the District Head.

Conditions· Municipal Water and Sanitation services are to be designed according to Departmental

Service Standards and approved prior to construction.· Handover of Municipal Water and Sanitation services will be subject to quality control

during construction.· Please note that this letter is not agreement to provide a new water or sewer connection to

the development. A formal application must be made in this regard to the ReticulationDistrict Head.

www.capetown.gov.za


3

· Development Contributions may be payable, not checked at this stage, butcan be resolved with the Reticulation District Head.

General/ DisclaimerInformation provided is based on best available data.

The flows and pressures provided in this comment are theoretical and not measured. Theinfrastructure as-built information referred to and used in the hydraulic models are based on theGIS asset records, while modelled pressures, flows, velocities, capacities and volumes are basedon hydraulic models of current land use and demands. Where appropriate, future land use anddemands are considered and the impact of a development compared to that currently plannedfor the same land and surroundings.

This comment on confirmation of the ability to service the development does not confer anyrights of development, which will be determined by the approved land use application processbeing followed.

Yours Faithfully

X

On behalf ofPeter FlowerDIRECTOR: WATER & SANITATION DEPARTMENT---------------------------------------------------

of 10

Department: Water & Sanitation – 21 December 2015 (Shamile Manie)

BackgroundWSP Group has been appointed to obtain confirmation of the available capacity withinthe existing network surrounding the proposed site. The intended land use is for 3600residential dwelling units as well as approximately 28 450m2 commercial space. Theproposed development has been catered for within our current master plan however interms of proposed water demand, it has to be noted that a predicted densification andAADD of 610 dwelling units and 591.67kl/d respectively was used, which is much lowerthan that which is being proposed at present.

This letter provides an analysis of the existing water and sewer infrastructure near thedevelopment.

Table 1.1: Estimated water and sewer demands based on gross floor area obtained usingapplicable floor space ratio from the town-planning scheme. (Departmental Standardsand Redbook Chapter 9)

Potable Water Demand Sewer Flow*

ERFNumber/Portion

NumberApplication

TotalAADD(kl/d)

Peak Flow(l/s)

(PF= 5.0)

Fire Flow(l/s)

Total ADWF

(kl/d)

Peak Flow(Dry

weather)(l/s)

(PF=3.5)

Erf 112657

Residential

(3600 units)

2160.0kl/d

131.60 l/s

25.0 l/s 1512.0 kl/d

66.0 l/sMixed Use

( ±28450m2)

113.80kl/d

25.0 l/s 108.11 kl/d

*Based on a 70 and 95% sewer flow design criterion

Conradie BLMEPProject Management Office

Project Manager: Mark Munro11 January 2016

Collective comments from the City of Cape Town: 1st Draft DevelopmentFramework

of 10

Water Reticulation

The site is situated within the Pinelands PRV water zone.

It appears as though the surrounding network has sufficient capacity to supply theproposed development with 131.60l/s. Due to the increase in demand as compared tothe previous application submitted the velocity in the 380mmØ distribution main increasesto approximately 1.5m/s. This peak velocity is a bit high but the network canaccommodate the development. There may be a need to augment the supply or boostthe supply to satisfy the requirements under fire conditions.

See figure 1 for existing water network layout.

Bulk Water

No bulk water pipelines or infrastructure under the control of the City of Cape Town’s BulkWater Branch exist in by the proposed development shown in the application.

The City of Cape Town’s bulk supply system has sufficient water resources, treatment, bulkstorage and conveyance capacity to supply the estimated annual average dailydemand of 2273.80kl/day of the proposed development.

Sewer Reticulation

The proposed development drains to the Northern Area sewer which has no sparecapacity and experiences collapses in certain places. The new Northern Area Sewer is atthe completion stage of construction and will be commissioned shortly. Aftercommissioning this bulk sewer will have sufficient capacity to accommodate thisdevelopment.

See figure 2 for existing sewer network.

Wastewater

The anticipated wastewater flow from the proposed development has been calculatedto be 1620.11kl/d.

This proposed development is situated within the catchment of the Athlone WastewaterTreatment Works (WWTW). The treatment plant has insufficient unallocated capacity tohandle the anticipated wastewater from this development. The Cape Flats 3 bulk sewer isbeing constructed which will allow diversion from Athlone WWTW to the Cape Flats WWTWwhich is expected to be completed by June 2018.

The developer is required to provide a construction programme that is negotiated withthe Manger of the Waste Water branch, Mr. Kevin Samson. This negotiated programmewill be used to facilitate operational adjustments at Athlone if required.

of 10

Conclusion

There is sufficient capacity within the existing water network to accommodate theproposed development. This development can only proceed once the new NorthernAreas Sewer is fully commissioned.

Conditions

· Municipal Water and Sanitation services are to be designed according toDepartmental Service Standards and approved prior to construction.

· Handover of Municipal Water and Sanitation services will be subject to quality controlduring construction.

· Please note that this letter is not agreement to provide a new water or sewerconnection to the development. A formal application must be made in this regard tothe Reticulation District Head.

· Development Contributions may be payable, not checked at this stage, but can beresolved with the Reticulation District Head.

General/ Disclaimer

Information provided is based on best available data.

The flows and pressures provided in this comment are theoretical and not measured. Theinfrastructure as-built information referred to and used in the hydraulic models are basedon the GIS asset records, while modelled pressures, flows, velocities, capacities andvolumes are based on hydraulic models of current land use and demands. Whereappropriate, future land use and demands are considered and the impact of adevelopment compared to that currently planned for the same land and surroundings.

This comment on confirmation of the ability to service the development does not conferany rights of development, which will be determined by the approved land useapplication process being followed.

Department: Storm water – 23 December 2015 (Ben de Wet)

Herewith Storm water & Sustainability’s comment on the Conradie Concept DevelopmentFramework Report. (Draft 2, 11 Dec 2015)

1. My main criticism is that the development options (3a to 3c) do not specificallymention the alignment of the Elsieskraal canal.

2. It would appear from the (unclear, unlabelled) sketches that all 3 options call forthe diversion of the canal, but I can’t be sure.

3. Only in section 6.4.5.1 are canal realignment options discussed. Then it is stated that“Option 3C is considered the preferred option”

4. Is this a reference to Development Option Variation 3C (section 6.4), in which case Iam no clearer as to the canal alignment, or is it a typo and intended to refer tostorm water option 3? (section 6.4.5.1)

of 10

5. Below are my specific comments numbered according to the report numbering;6. 2.3.2.6 We will require Storm water management and maintenance plans (2

reports)7. 2.4.1 “EIA not required based on current alignment”. Does this include relocation

of the canal?8. 2.4.2.1 Very confusing. The floodplain of a ‘non-watercourse’ is deemed to be

part of a watercourse. Suggest DWS clarification is obtained. We would not supportextraction of summer low-flows from the canal.

9. 4.1.6. High-level flooding studies have been conducted for the site. These showthat the site is flooded during events from 1:10 years and up. More refined studiesindicate that the flooding may be mainly due to local rainfall and to a lesser extentdue to the canal overtopping. The City has been tasked with mitigating the canalflooding. The Conradie developer will have to deal with localised flooding in termsof the City’s storm water bylaw and policies. The preferred canal alignment option,its design and the fate of the existing canal should be discussed here as it will be anessential input into the flooding investigation to be conducted by the City.

10. 5.1.1 Water – the site is in a floodplain.11. 5.1.2. Elsieskraal river canal – This paragraph mentions the canal is on the edge of

the development! Is it to be realigned or not? The City will support the sensitiverestoration of the river.

12. 6.4.5.1 Storm water handling must meet the requirements of City policy.13. Annex A should include the Floodplain and River Management Policy (2009)14. Has any thought been given to possible integration/synergies between the

Conradie and the TRUP developments?15. Will NMT be considered beyond the borders of the site?16. These comments apply equally to the second draft of the consultation NID.

Department: Electricity – 23 December 2015 (Shiraaz Swartland)

I refer to your request for comments and advise as follows:

The estimated bulk capacity required to supply the proposed 3603 residentialdwelling units and the 28450 square metres of other space is approximately 15 MVA.

1. There is a main substation located close to the development that currently hassufficient spare capacity to accommodate this load. (The estimated capacity wascalculated as an indication only, to enable comment regarding the availability ofsufficient capacity. It should not be viewed as the final demand, which must becalculated by the developers’ consultant, or the capacity that will be allocated tothedevelopment.)

2. A master site development plan, indicating the phasing of the development plansof the individual sites, ¡s required. Note that the electricity infrastructure servingeach site may not be dedicated to that site alone. Infrastructure such as substationsites may be required to serve a wider area or future phases of the project.

of 10

3. Individual site development plans are required prior to or concurrently withsubdivision applications and not thereafter.

4. A development framework detailing the overall policy, goals and principles for thedevelopment as well as development limitations in terms of density and floor spacewill be required.

5. The approved Heads of Agreement is requested for scrutiny and further commentin order to ascertain the impact of the development on this department.

6. The phasing of electricity services and implications detailed on page 67 of thereport is subject to change depending on the phasing of the proposeddevelopment and the integration of the internal electrical reticulation of theproposed development with the department’ s existing electrical infrastructure..

7. Any alterations to or deviation of electricity services necessary, as a consequenceof the proposal or requested by the applicant, will be carried out at the applicantscost.

8. A servitude for electricity services is located in the fringes of the north-easternportion of the area in question. If this area is to be developed, consultation with thisdepartment will be required.

9. Substation sites will be required in locations approved by this department. Theseproperties shall be directly accessible from the public road and shall not betransversed by any other services. Sites required can take the form of acombination of the following:

a. Outdoor substations on 5m x 4m sitesb. Substation buildings on 20m x 14m sites

These substations shall be appropriately subdivided and zoned in the planapproved by the surveyor general.

10. The electricity reticulation network is to be installed in the road reserve with asidewalk width sufficiently wide to accommodate the electricity network required.Special attention will be required where high voltage cables are to beaccompanied.

11. The property owner is required to include in the development measures to improveenergy efficiency to reduce the consumption of electricity.

Department: Transport for Cape Town – 23 December 2015 (Marissa Adams)

1. Roadsa. Bulk External Roads

Input required from Transport (Tony Vieira) with respect to alignment; time framesfor implementation; acquisition of land and parties responsible for costs and theoffsetting of development contributions.

Input required from Transport (TIA section)

of 10

b. Internal Roads (on site roads)The 16m road reserve is not adequate to accommodate the proposed layout.Parallel parking bays must have minimum width of 2.5m. Two way roads to haveminimum width of 6.1m kerb to kerb. Transport (TIA) to comment on width of trafficlanes w.r.t. the inclusion of bicycle lanes in them. Cable zones to be identified onverges to ensure that tree planting opportunities are not compromised. Provision tobe made for street furniture (bus shelters / service boxes / canopies) to ensureadequate pedestrian space and minimum clearances. Detail road design for thelater approval by this district office.

2. Stormwatera) Bulk interventions

Approval required from Catchment Management (Ben de Wet) along withcomment on development contributions.

b) On site servicesApproval required from Catchment Management (Ben de Wet) w.r.t. detentionponds and SUDS. Stormwater reticulation network for the later approval by thisdistrict office.

3. Development contributionsThis report will suffice for the rezoning application to sub divisional area as nodevelopment contribution is triggered at this stage since no additional rights will beacquired beyond the existing uses (Limited Use zone). The basket of rightstable (with associated existing rights) will be required with the rezoning applicationto more intensive use in order to calculate development contributions.

Department: Spatial Planning and Urban Design – 24 December 2015 (Liezel Kruger-Fountain)

1. IntroductionFollowing a pre-application meeting, where the Concept Development Frameworkwas tabled, we were requested to provide comment on this Phase 1 Conceptdevelopment. This represents a 22ha site with residential development of 3 603dwellings (split between 49% social housing and 50% market related rental, officesfor 13 252m², Retail of 9 180m², 2 primary/secondary schools for around 1 540learners, open green space and a community hall. The aim is start implementationfrom March 2018.

2. Alignment with spatial planning policy guidelines and frameworksThe proposals as set out in the Concept Development Framework (Dec 2015) isgenerally in alignment with the provisions of the Cape Town Spatial DevelopmentFramework (2012) and the Table Bay District Plan (2012) (TBDP) in terms of mixeduse intensification and increased densification through inclusionary housingproposals. It also proposes to integrate the site visually and physically with the

of 10

existing surrounding residential areas and aim to integrate the green links with thenew development (Elsieskraal River Canal).

3. General discussiona. Integration between the Conradie site and the future Mupine development is

important to create an integrated area rather than 2 independent sites. This willassist in creating community and enable the utilisation of other uses by both.Adequate amenities and community facilities for both should therefore be takeninto account.

b. Transport and general service capacity is very limited and must be resolved in theunlocking of this site. A focus on creating Safe pedestrian routes between schoolsand residential areas can contribute to the legibility of the area.

c. Spatial challenges and constraints identified (p.19) offer clear direction for thedevelopment of the area. This includes better legibility, hierarchy and streetnetworks and ease of access, enclosure (but not gated-communities) andtransition in built form between the proposed and the existing so as create a moreintegrated community.

d. Suggest a ‘concept diagram’ to go with the main elements of the developmentconcept (on p.24, 6.1). This could be high level diagram with big arrows/characterareas, etc. This diagram then becomes the guiding ‘brief’ for the eventualDevelopment Framework (phase 2). It is important to assist the City in having keyobjectives and principles to hold on to in future phases of the application. Thestrengthening of this section could be very helpful – keep as a 2 page spread.Maybe it should be more at the back of the section (6) rather than the front.Unpack first the road to the concept and then define the concept elementsclearly.

e. Move Section 6.2 then forward (see note below). Also suggest that point 8 is cutfrom the ‘main elements and rather put forward as a separate paragraph talkingabout the reason why variations 3a and 3b are not taken forward. i.e. section 6.6(p.41) is too short and could be bulked up a bit.

f. Has the option of higher densities and taller built form at the centre of the sitebeen looked at? The current proposal suggests the stronger built form on theedges (fig 24; p35) which is then not as easily transitioned to the surroundingcommunities. If the core (heart) of the development is stronger, it would alsocontribute to the legibility of the area and give clear direction as to where higherorder activities can be found. It could also strengthen the movement hierarchyand allow for movement patterns to assist in integrating the community.Alternatively the transition along the edges must be very carefully handled (builtform wise) so as to not result in development turning its back (please see UrbanDesign Policy. Suggest that the blocks along the edges must receive additionaldesign focus. The creation of clear public and private spaces will go a long way in

of 10

creating integrated communities. Creating private spaces (back gardens)exposed to the edges will not assist in this.

g. The landscape design and storm water attenuation section is welcomed.

h. Concern about the size of residential units of around 43 – 45m². Not clear if theseare all rental units or if future additions to units are possible, taking into account thegeneral momentum. The reason is so as to not create slum conditions, i.e. thepublic realm in such areas must be so carefully planned and designed that cleardistinction is drawn from the outset.

i. Would suggest that character areas are developed from the ConceptDevelopment Framework so that the site is not broken up into built form types, butrather character types, i.e. what makes a certain area different – what is it’scharacter and how does the built form respond to this? The ConceptDevelopment Framework could already establish these character areas andestablish design briefs/principles for their development, i.e. supporting anintegrated development with variation throughout, rather than boxed in areas.This will also help with the social integration between people rather than separatethem according to ‘built form’ – a very delegate design decision. Use the builtform to strengthen integration.

j. Gross density identified as 164du/ha with a Nett Density of close to 300du/ha. Thisis very high and care need to be taken as to the development. From experience,there will have to be a considered effort to keep the development to well definedprinciples and objectives and to not relax on these until the end otherwise thedevelopment will become less-desirable. The transition between phases and allphase’s focused approach is necessary. The maintenance and management ofthe community from the outset is also critical so as to establish a sense ofcommunity. I suggest the establishment of community leaders that is ‘placed’ firstto help in new residents. They offer advice as to how the system will work, howpeople should act within the community, where information if found, etc. Withhigh density developments, one needs to be proactive with community-making,not just place-making! This is all part of the ongoing management of an area buthas to start early.

k. In light of a very rapid development process envisioned, we suggest that theDevelopment Framework (phase 2) be initiated ASAP. The current ConceptDevelopment Framework should therefore please clearly identify the strategy tobe incorporated into the eventual Development Framework of Phase 2): Thisstrategy must identify key objectives and development principles that can beunpacked in the Development Framework. It is critical to have these defined and‘bought into’ ASAP so as to support the rapid speed of the rest of the process.

of 10

l. With this is the establishment of community facilities ASAP, i.e. not merely theprovision of housing. Communities are formed around community functions andtherefore, if these are delivered later, the sense of community cohesion ishampered. We therefore stress the importance of establishing/funding andprovision of community facilities very early on in the process – lessons fromDunoon. In addition, the establishment of the green infrastructure (trees/plants)early on would contribute to the feeling of a more established environment earlieron. Pre-planting can be done early on so as to afford the growing/establishmentof the trees until such time as the community moves in.

m. The FINAL Development Framework must develop clear design guidelines to assistthe SDP processes to follow. Without these, the individual SDPs and their evaluationcould cause lengthy periods so assisting a clear and defined way forward is veryimportant. Alignment to the Development Framework will be key, i.e. theimportance of having the Development Framework (not just a concept DevFramework) is critical to take the process forward and help the City to assist therapid process.

n. The NID refers to (in the recommendations) to Urban Design Guidelines – can thisbe clearly evaluated and incorporated into the Development Framework (as wellas Conceptual Framework). Links between the various reports should bereinforced.

4. General notesa. P17 - 4.1.1 – last sentence: …mixed land-uses due to/resulting from…b. P21 - Figure 6 – missing key elements (green arrows; white triangles? – possibly add

the catchment areas for the schools in terms of walking distances)c. P31 – suggest you move the second sentence to the top/as the start of the 6.4

sectiond. P47 – section 9.4 – the numbering of the bulk is unnecessary. Also, the heading is

confusing and could possibly be re-worked.e. P57 – 10.3.1 – check spelling in first paragraph.f. Not sure that mixed use development along Forest Drive is as accessibly as placing

it at the heart/along the spine of the development (lessons learned from MiltonKeynes, UK). The focus should be on creating a heart for and hierarchy within thedevelopment rather than accessibility for cars to developments.

g. P 68 – section 13 – next steps: some reference issues.

Please note the Urban Design Policy (2013) and make specific reference to it indocumentation to assist the eventual planning applications to be policy compliant.

Internationally it has been recognised that design, and more specifically urban design,can add value to development processes and play a positive role in urbantransformation. The intention of the Urban Design Policy is to guide the design process and

of 10

formulation of development proposals so as to make Cape Town safer, more prosperousand more inclusive.

Please download policy here:http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/Planningportal/Documents/Urban%20Design%20Policy.pdf

Please minimise parking at ground floor of buildings – this goes against policy objectivesand hamper safety. Basement parking should be investigated so as to not create a sea ofparking (now or in the future).

We look forward to the development of the Development Framework (phase 2) andsubsequent SDPs from this.

1


Appendix JCORRESPONDENCE WITH COCT SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT

1

van Beek, Bryony

From: Anthony Isaacs <[email protected]>Sent: 13 October 2015 07:57 AMTo: Snyman, JohanSubject: RE: conradie site

Morning Johan

With regards to the previous servicing of Conradie hospital it would be No we never serviced them . With regards tothe capacity of the COCT to service Conradie , we can however we would on service the office waste NO other .

RegardsAnthony IsaacsSen Superintendent Atlantic collectionSolid Waste - Collections and Drop OffTel 021 442 8100Fax: 021 448 2250Cell: 084 3333 004Email [email protected]

CITYwebMySite

From: Snyman, Johan [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: 12 October 2015 04:20 PMTo: Anthony IsaacsSubject: FW: conradie site

Hi Anthony

As discussed:

1) Did Conradie Hospital used to manage their own solid waste?2) Do COCT have capacity (and what are the implications) to service the solid waste for the site? i.e are there

restrictions in the handling capacity at Athlone Waste transfer station?

Many Thanks

2

Johan Snyman Pr Tech EngCivil Technologist

WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff, Development, Transportation and Infrastructure, Africa3rd Floor, 35 Wale Street, Cape Town, 8001, South AfricaTel: +27 21 481 8697Mob: +27 84 265 3222Fax: +27 21 481 8799

www.wspgroup.co.zawww.pbworld.com

WSP and Parsons Brinckerhoff have combined and are now one of the world's leading engineering professional services consulting firms. We bring togetherour 32,000 staff, based in more than 500 offices, across 39 countries to provide engineering and multidisciplinary services in a vast array of industry sectors,with a focus on technical excellence and client service.

This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer: http://www.wspgroup.com/en/Welcome-to-WSP-Africa/WSP-Africa/Disclaimer

WSP Group Africa (Pty) Ltd, Registered Office: WSP House, Bryanston Place, 199 Bryanston Drive, Bryanston, 2191, South Africa Registered Number:1999/008928/07 South Africa

Disclaimer: This e-mail (including attachments) is subject to the disclaimer published at:http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/Pages/disclaimer.aspx. Please read the disclaimer before opening anyattachment or taking any other action in terms of this e-mail. If you cannot access the disclaimer, kindlysend an email to [email protected] and a copy will be provided to you. By replying to this e-mail or opening any attachment you agree to be bound by the provisions of the disclaimer.

No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4435/10953 - Release Date: 11/05/15

1


Appendix KLIST OF CORRESPONDENCE AND MEETINGS

DAY DATE TIME VENUE CONTACT NAME/DEPARTMENT / COMPANY

CONTACT DETAILS MEETING DESCRIPTION REPRESENTATIVEFINANCIAL

TRANSACTIONADVISORY &

TECHNICAL TEAMFriday 18-09-2015 13h45 - 15h00 13th Floor, 2

Bayside, CivicCentre, CapeTown

Trade and invest:Development FacilitationUnit: CoCT

As per attendanceRegister

Stormwater Flood LinesMeeting

Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa

Tuesday 22-09-2015 11h00 - 11h30 17th Floor, 2Bayside, CivicCentre, CapeTown

P Roux (CoCT Stormwater)Storm Water MasterPlanning Dept

+27 21 400 1053pierre.roux@capeto

wn.gov.za

Receive StormwaterFloodline information indata format


Wednesday 23-09-2015 / Telephone and E-mail

B de Wet (CoCT Stormwater)Storm Water MasterPlanning Dept

+27 21 400 5036johannes.dewet@ca

petown.gov.za

Receive StormwaterFloodline information inCAD format


Tuesday 07-10-2015 / Telephone and E-mail

P Roux (CoCT Stormwater)Storm Water MasterPlanning Dept

+27 21 400 1053pierre.roux@capeto

wn.gov.za

Receive SW master planof Salt River-received


Tuesday 13-10-2015 / Telephone and E-mail

M Schmidt / C Davids (CoCT)Electricity Dept

+27 21 444 2181calvin.davids@capet

own.gov.za

Existing ElectricalInfrastructure (Ongoing)



S Manie Water (CoCT)Demand Management &Strategy

+27 21 444 0739shamile.manie@cap

etown.gov.za

Current Water andSanitation Infrastructure.Demand and futureprojects. (Ongoing)


Monday 12-10-2015 / Telephone and E-mail

A Isaacs (CoCT) Atlanticcollection Solid Waste -Collections and Drop Off

+27 21 442 8100anthony.isaacs@cap

etown.gov.za

Historical Solid Wasteinformation and planned



M Mulcahy, Green Cape [email protected] Green discussions Kathy Ziehl-Roux,WSP Group Africa


A Hazel, Human SettlementsWestern cape Government

+27 21 483 5616hazell@westerncape

.gov.za

Sanitation Alternativesdiscussion


Thursday 15-10-2015 14h30 to15h30

Meeting G Gerber, Western CapeGovernment

[email protected]

Environmental issuesdiscussions

Friday 16-10-2015 09h00 to09h30

Meeting A Hazel, Human SettlementsWestern cape Government

+27 21 483 5616anthony.hazell@wes

terncape.gov.za

Sanitation Alternativesdiscussion


AIDE MEMOIRE

OF

BETTER LIVING MODEL (BLMEP)

CONRADIE SITE – TELEPHONIC MEETINGS AND E-MAILS -

SUBJECT DAY DATECONTACT NAME/DEPARTMENT /

COMPANYMEETING DESCRIPTION

Storm water Wednesday 23-09-2015 B de Wet (CoCTStormwater) Storm WaterMaster Planning Dept

Receive Stormwater Floodlineinformation in CAD format.

Storm water Tuesday 06-10-2015 P Roux (CoCTStormwater) Storm WaterMaster Planning Dept

Receive SW master plan of SaltRiver-received.

Elictricity Tuesday 13-10-2015 M Schmidt / C Davids(CoCT) Electricity Dept

Existing Electrical Infrastructure(Ongoing)

Water &Sanitation

Wednesday 07-10-2015 S Manie Water (CoCT)Demand Management& Strategy

Current Water and SanitationInfrastructure. Demand andfuture projects. (Ongoing)

Solid Waste Monday 12-10-2015 A Isaacs (CoCT) Atlanticcollection Solid Waste -Collections and Drop Off

Historical Solid Wasteinformation and planned

Sustainability /Green Design

Wednesday 14-10-2015 M Mulcahy, GreenCape

Going Green discussions.Received e-mail information onGreen Design.

Sanitation Wednesday 15-10-2015 A Hazel, HumanSettlements WesternCape Government

Sanitation Alternativesdiscussion. Meeting arrangedfor Fri 16-10-2015.

Environmental Thursday 15-10-2015 Gerhard Gerber,Western CapeGovernment

To liaise with all the ProvincialDepartments to:• Identify each department’sability to contribute todevelopment vision andinnovation, based on businessunusual and define specificproject objectives and targets;• Confirm backlogs in housingand/or facilities or serviceprovision with relevantdepartments; and• Confirm departmental UAMP’s(user asset management plans)and implementationprogrammes with relevantdepartments.

Aide memoire prepared by Johan Snyman2015-OCTOBER-15

1


Appendix LCONRADIE BLEMP SITE LOCALITY PLAN

ERF

112657

FO

R

ES

T D

R

IVE

EX

TE

N

SIO

N

R

A

I

L

W

A

Y

L

I

N

E

J

A

N

S

M

U

T

S

D

R

I

V

E

EXISTING CANAL

VIKING

PARK

THORNTON

SITE BOUNDARY

WCG

ORTHOTIC

AND

PROSTHETIC

CENTRE

JEWISH

CEMETERY

PINELANDS

CLIENT: SCALE : CHECKED: APPROVED:

DRAWN: DATE:

PROJECT No: DRAWING No: REV:

DESIGN:

PROJECT:

-

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION CHK APD

DRAWING STATUS:

TITLE:

NTS

JULY 2016

WESTERN CAPE

GOVERNMENT

CONRADIE BLEMP

LOCALITY PLAN

25027 C001 B

A APRIL 2016 - INITIAL ISSUE - -

3rd Floor 35 Wale St. Cape Town 8000

PO Box 2613 Cape Town 8000

Tel: +27(0)21-481-8700 Fax: +27(0)21-481-8799 www.wspgroup.co.za

WSP Group Africa (Pty) Ltd

Development, Transportation and Infrastructure

CA

D F

IL

E N

AM

E: Z

:\2

00

00

- 2

09

99

\2

05

27

- C

on

ra

die

G

am

e C

ha

ng

er P

ro

je

ct\3

. C

ivils\3

- D

ra

win

gs\3

.3

D

ra

win

gs\D

WG

S

HE

ET

S\C

00

1 L

oca

lity P

la

n re

v2

.d

wg

PLO

T D

AT

E: 2016/07/07 02:42:24 P

M

TEMPLATE VERSION 1.1

PRELIMINARY

COPYRIGHT RESERVEDC

The content of this document is privileged and confidential and may not be disclosed or reproduced

without the express authorisation of the author, being "WSP GROUP AFRICA (PTY) LTD"

If drawing status = construction, a signed copy of this drawing (either in hardcopy

or electronic format) is available at the office of origin and at the office of issue.

PR No.:

1


Appendix MEXTERNAL AND INTERNAL BULK INFRASTRUCTUREPLANNING

External Bulk Infrastructure Planning

Infrastructure type Description Requirement for phase

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Flood relief Increased capacity by diverting the ElsieskraalRiver Canal, including storm water attenuationareas

Required

Storm water On-site storm water attenuation and connectionto the Elsieskraal River Canal

Required

Water Connection to bulk line along Forest DriveExtension

Required

Sewer On-site pump station, rising main and connectionto existing bulk line across lower end of theElsieskraal River Canal

Required

Solid waste None N/A

Electricity Connection to main supply, incl. sub-stations Required

Roads & transportation Odin Road extension (including a bridge over theElsieskraal River Canal)

Required

Class 4 local access road traversing the site fromForest Drive Extsension to Odin Drive Extension –also part of the the required internal roadnetwork

Required

Local intersection upgrades andsignalisation:Forest Drive Extension/Mutual Way,Mutual Way/Jan Smuts Drive, Odin Road/ThorCrescent, Odin Road/Viking Way, 2 newaccesses off Forest Drive Extension

Required

Aerodrome Rd Extension from Odin RoadExtension to Voortrekker Road (1.4 km road link &bridge over Forest Drive Extension/Northernrailway line.)

Required

Internal Bulk Infrastructure Planning

Infrastructure type Description Requirement for phase

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Flood relief & Stormwater

Internal storm water network Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase

Water Internal water network Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase

Sewer Internal sewer network and on-site pumpstation, rising main and connection to bulkline along Elsieskraal River Canal for the shortterm. Possibility of on-site treatment for longterm development for re-use.

Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase

Solid waste Waste collection and pick-upareas. Possibility of on-site sorting of wet anddry waste, including recycling waste, forthe long-term sustainable option.


Electricity Internal electrical reticulation, incl. sub-stations, etc. and possible long term on site‘green’ energy for site reticulation.


Roads &transportation

Internal road network incl. NMT. Required per phase Required per phase Required per phase

A Class 4 local access road over the site fromOdin Road Extension to Forest Drive Extension.

Required

A local access road from the site to theadjacent clinic.

Required