report on mission 12 to uttar pradesh · report on mission 12 to uttar pradesh(u p~ 1 2.) sector:...
TRANSCRIPT
III\II
I
II
Iiiii;iii
R 8 2 2
IN.UT 8 5
INDIAReport on mission 12 to Uttar Pradesh (U P~ 1 2.)
Sector: Rural Water SupplyPurpose: - Progress evaluation of rural water supply projects under
Sub-Projects I and III- Technical appraisal of proposed water supply schemes
for Sub-Project IV
Commissioned by: Development Co-operation Department Asia andMultilateral Financial Development Matters (DAL) of theNetherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
April 1985
water supply
II R 82.2-^0'}
Composition of mission UP -12:
R. Trietsch - DHV Consulting Engineers, leader of the missionA.K. Sen Gupta - Asstt. Adviser (PHE), CPHEEOJ.A. Speets - Water Supply Coordinator, Royal Netherlands Embassy
I).1 , 1)1,
I
ii.i
t*(i
iIiiIu.] •i,VI
,(:'|
I
Fiiii .
!'.
ii <tI
I INDIAReport on mission 1 2 to Uttar Pradesh ( U P~ I 2.)
I
| Sector: Rural Water SupplyPurpose: - Progress evaluation of rural water supply projects under
•Sub-Projects I and III
- Technical appraisal of proposed water supply schemesfor Sub-Project IV
• Commissioned by: Development Co-operation Department Asia and™ Multilateral Financial Development Matters (DAL) of the
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs
I
I
I
I
IApril 1985
j Edited by:
R. Trietsch - DHV Consulting Engineers - Amersfoort, The Netherlands
I
11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
LIST OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY REPORTS, UTTAR PRADESH 4
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 5
1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 6
2. SUB-PROJECT I (UP EAST) 9
2.1. Physical progress 92.1.1. General aspects 92.1.2. Progress of schemes in Rae Bareli District 102.1.3. Progress of schemes in Allahabad District 112.1.4. Progress of schemes in Varanasi District 112.2. Public standposts and private connections 122.2.-1. Present public standpost situation 122.2.2. Private connections 122.2.3. Estimate of required numbers of public standposts 142.2.4. Comparison of required and realized numbers
of standposts 152.2.5. Conclusions 192.3. Power supply 192.4. Supply hours 212.5. Project duration 222.6. Project costs 23
3. SUB-PROJECT III (HAND PUMP SCHEMES) 26
3.1. Status of Sub-project III 263.2. Procurement procedures and quality control
measures 26
4. SUB-PROJECT IV (UP EAST) 27
4.1. General aspects 274.2. Design criteria 284.3. Population projections 294.4. Implementation schedule 344.5. Approval procedure 34
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
5. MISCELLANEOUS ASPECTS 37
5.1. Hydrogeological cell 375.2. Additional activities 375.2.1. Additional provisions-under Sub-Project I 375.2.2. Computer equipment 38
ANNEXES: A. Terms of Reference for Review and Appraisal Mission UP-12B. Itinerary of missionC. List of authorities visited/senior staff
involved in implementation of the schemesD. Conclusions and Recommendations of the Indo-Dutch Review
Mission (UP-12) of April 1985 to Uttar Pradesh(Sub-Projects East I, III, IV)
E. Scheme-wise break-down of required numbers of publicstandposts
F. Scheme-wise summary of data (Sub-Project East-I)G. Report for pre-appraisal of Sub-Project II(East)(revised),
Instalment IH. Scheme-wise summary of data (proposed schemes, Sub-Project
East IV)
11111111111111111I111
LIST OF RURAL WATER
Report DatedNo.
UP-1 November 1978
UP-2 March 1979
UP-3 November 1979
UP-4 April 1981
UP-5 December 1981
UP-6 March 1982
UP-7 May 1982
UP-8 February 1983
UP-9 October 1983
UP-10 October 1984
UP-11 March 1985
UP- 11 May 1985
4
SUPPLY REPORTS, UTTAR PRADESH
Subject
Appraisal
Appraisal
Reappraisal
Progress evaluationReappraisal
Progress evaluationReappraisal
Hydro-geological appraisal 2,Preliminary Report,
Progress evaluation
Comprehensive review andappraisal
Progress evaluation
Progress evaluation
Work plan for sanitation,drainage and healthActivities
Progress evaluationAppraisal
Sub-Project
East-I
West-I
East-I
East-IWest-I
East-IEast-II
West-I
East-I, -II
East-I, -IIWest-I, -II
East-I
East-I, -II, -IIIWest
East-I, III, IVWest
East-IEast-III, -IV
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ACAECECICPHEEO
DCPEEE&MESRGo IHCHDPEIpcdO&MPAPHCPHEPHMechCPHPCPHSSubDivPHWDivPPRDPRRCCSC/STSESEBTWUPUPJNVT
asbestos cementassistant engineerchief engineercast ironCentral Public Health & Environmental EngineeringOrganizationDutch Credit Progammeexecutive engineerelectrical and mechanicalelevated service reservoirGovernment of Indiahouse connectionhigh-density polyethylenelitres per capita and per dayoperation and maintenancepersonal assistantPublic Health CirclePublic Health EngineeringPublic Health Mechanical CirclePublic Health Project CirclePublic Health Sanitary Sub-DivisionPublic Health Works DivisionProject Preparation, Research and Developmentpublic relationsreinforced (cement) concretescheduled castes/scheduled tribessuperintending engineerState Electricity BoardtubewellUttar PradeshUttar Pradesh Jal Nigamvertical turbine
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
Indo-Dutch Review Mission UP-12 visited Uttar Pradesh in April 1985.The aim of this mission, which consisted of Mr. R. Trietsch (DHV Consult-ing Engineers), Mr. A.K. Sen Gupta (Asstt. Adviser, CPHEEO) and Mr. J.A.Speets (Water Supply Coordinator at the Royal Netherlands Embassy in NewDelhi) was threefold (see also the Terms of Reference, in Annex A).
First, the mission was to evaluate the progress of the implementation ofthe so-called Dutch Credit Programme (DCP) schemes in Uttar Pradesh,which are situated in the easterly districts of Rae Bareli, Allahabad andVaranasi.Secondly, the status-quo of the proposed hand pump schemes under Sub-Project III was to be reviewed.Finally, a technical appraisal was to be carried out of newly proposedschemes that had been selected as a replacement for the former Sub^-Project II schemes.
As was mentioned in report UP-10 of October 1984, the schemes that hadoriginally been proposed under Sub-Projects West-I and East-II had afterall not been included in the Dutch-financed projects, as a result ofwhich these Sub-Projects were in fact no longer included in the DCPpackage. In order to prevent any misunderstandings, it was decided,therefore, to refer to the newly proposed schemes as Sub-Project IVrather than Sub-Project II (new).
After preliminary discussions in New Delhi (see "Itinerary of Mission",Annex B) the mission departed for Lucknow on April 16, 1985.There the mission had discussions with the Managing Director and seniorstaff of the Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam, and then departed for field visitsin the Rae Bareli, Allahabad and Varanasi Districts.A total of 11 schemes under Sub-Project I (East) were visited, as well asa few villages in the area to be covered by the newly proposed schemes(Sub-Project IV). In all districts the progress of the schemes under Sub-Project I was discussed with the field staff (see Annex C for a list ofpeople involved).In addition, the demographic and technical basis for the newly proposedschemes was discussed extensively, both in the field and in Lucknow.
At the end of the field visits, the mission members returned to Lucknowto discuss the mission's findings, as laid down in the "Conclusions andRecommendations of the Indo-Dutch Review Mission (UP-12) of April 1985to Uttar Pradesh" (see Annex D).
After the mission's return to New Delhi a debriefing took place at theMinistry of Works and Housing, with the Adviser (PHEE), CPHEEO.
The main conclusions of the mission may be summarized as follows:
a. Although during the previous mission's visit it was indicated that -with a few exceptions - all schemes would be completed by the end of1984, and be fully commissioned, including increased numbers of
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
standposts, by March 1985, the mission found that actual progresshas again lagged behind expectation.It is now expected that many of the schemes will not be fullycommissioned before July-September of this year, and possibly notbefore the year 1986.
Notwithstanding earlier commitments, the number of constructedIstandposts has still not been raised to the agreed level. In addi-tion, most of the standposts are still not of the agreed so-called'vandal-proof design.
Chapter 2.2. of this report calculates in detail the numbers ofpublic standposts that should be included in the DCP schemes. Itiappears that the so-called 'increased number of public standposts'(is based on predicted 1981 population figures rather than actualpresent population, let alone future population. As a result ofthis, the number of presently constructed public standposts is notsufficient to cater for those people that do not have a privateconnection. Much emphasis should thus be given to constructing thebalance of the required standposts.
The mission feels that there is a lack of incentive within the U.P.Jal Nigam to commission the schemes in time, and concludes thatprobably too much attention has been directed towards other schemes(that appear to have been commissioned in record time). The Dutchmission members therefore propose that such incentive be created byipromising to withhold reimbursements for expenditures incurredbeyond the present year, with the exception of the Udari scheme,where compelling reasons caused earlier delays.
Progress with the implementation of the so-called exempted feedershas been disappointing. In 9 cases exempted feeders were either notyet commissioned or inoperable due to theft of wires or too low ortoo high voltages. It is recommended that the U.P. Jal Nigam contactthe State Electricity Board in order to ascertain a speedy implemen-tation, as well as voltages within an acceptable range.
Pending the exchange of side letters on Sub-Project III (hand pumps)no further activities have been undertaken by the U.P. Jal Nigam.
The mission received a summary report on 9 out of 11 proposedschemes under Sub-Project IV, and analyzed 8 of the correspondingproject reports. Although in general the set-up of the schemes isaccording to that used in Sub-Project I (East), in the mission'sopinion the proposed design population was far too low.
After extensive discussions it was agreed that the technical designcriteria for all projects and the demographic dat for the Bairi Bisha,Inargaon and Hathi Barni schemes were acceptable to the mission. Higherdesign populations, however, should be adopted for the remainingschemes.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
In addition, the implementation schedule for the schemes should bebased upon more realistic assumptions than mentioned in the reports(start by mid-1986 at the earliest; construction period at least 3years).
The U.P. Jal Nigam promised to have the relevant project designreports adapted, as well as processed internally and by the U.P.State Government, by June 1985. The Ministry of Works and Housing inNew Delhi would be able to process the reports within one month'stime.
All parties concerned urged the Indian and Netherlands Governmentsto have the procedures regarding the approval of the Sub-Projectterminated within as short a period as possible, as the rural areafor which the schemes are intended suffers from severe drought.
During the discussions and field visit it appeared that there is a needfor more reliable and field-tested design data on which to base thedesigns for rural water supply schemes. Especially the fact that inIpractice such schemes are operated differently (e.g. during less hours'per day) than according to the design criteria, has to be taken intoaccount, as this may have far-reaching effects on the effectivity of theschemes themselves.
Important parameters that need to be investigated in more detail (includ-ing their effect on financial/economical viability of operation andmaintenance of the schemes under rural circumstances) are:
design period (10, 15 or 30 years, including feasibility ofphased implementation)population growth rates to be adopted (linear or exponentialgrowth rate; extrapolation of census figures, etc.)per capita water demand (40, 50, 55, 70, 90 Ipcd?)water consumption pattern of rural population under conditions ofplentiful water availability; effect of reducing supply hourscattle watering provisions (necessary, feasible?)effect of selected design period and per capita water provisionson possibility of private connectionsearning capacity of rural population and willingness to pay forwaterfeasibility of private connections under rural Indian circumstan-cesdesirable number of standposts for the population including sche-duled castesrevenue earning capacity of schemes as function of design capaci-ty/per capita water demand
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
2. SUB-PROJECT I (UP EAST)
2.1. Physical progress
2.1.1. General aspects
During the visit of Mission UP-10 to Uttar Pradesh the commissioning ofthe various schemes was expected to be as follows:
- Udari scheme (Rae Bareli) : September 1985all other schemes : March 1985
The mission, on its arrival in Uttar Pradesh, thus expected to see allschemes except Udari completed, and the Udari scheme in an advanced stageof completion. In fact, however, the progress of schemes, especially inthe Rae Bareli district, has been far from satisfactory:
- water sources have been completed in 18 out of 22 schemes- distribution systems have been completed in 18 schemes- elevated water reservoirs have been completed in 16 schemes
i- the required numbers of public standposts have been constructed" in 2 schemes (!)- 472 out of a total of 2101 completed public standposts have been
constructed in accordance with the agreed criteria for a so-called 'vandal-proof design9 schemes out of a total of 19 have been provided with exemptedfeeders (the remaining 3 schemes either depend on a power sub-station that has not yet been constructed, or do not requireexempted feeders for other reasons)in 3 of the commissioned exempted feeders the voltage is fre-quently outside the range that is suitable for running the pumps
' (over/under-voltage) or the system is repeatedly out of order dueto theft of wires or other reasons
As can be seen from the above list, especially the number of publicstandposts that has been constructed is far below the required minimum.The main reason for this is that the directive from the U.P. Jal Nigam.management, to temporarily 'freeze' the numbers of public standposts in'order to boost the number of private connections, that was to be with-drawn as a result of the discussions of mission UP-10, was in fact stillin force.More details about the public standpost situation will be given in para-graph 2.2.
As presently anticipated, most schemes will be commissioned in the periodbetween mid-1985 and end-1985. A number of schemes have been commissionedalready, albeit without the required number of public standposts, and notalways with exempted feeder. The latter is generally out of the controlof the U.P. Jal Nigam, however.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
10
2.1.2. Progress of schemes in Rae Bareli District
During its field trip the mission visited the DCP schemes Udari, Banna-mau, Ralpur, Govindpur, Ferozpur and Bhojpur, and discussed the progressof all schemes with the Rae Bareli field staff.
At the time of the mission's visit the water sources (tubewells or cavitywells) had been constructed in all schemes, although TW No. 3 of Jagatpurand TW No. 3 of Behtakalan still had to be developed, and the respectivepumps procured and/or installed.
Of the 10 overhead reservoirs, 4 had been completed at the time of themission's last visit. Presently, 4 OHT have been commissioned, one isunder testing, two have been completed for 90%, and the remaining threehave been completed for 60% (Thulendi), for 45% (Ashrafpur) and for 20%(Udari).
The slow progress of the OHT construction at Thulendi is attributed toithe fact that this structure is still being constructed by a contractor(in most other cases contracts have been rescinded), under the old rates(which - because of the rising costs - are less than attractive for thecontractor involved).
In Ashrafpur the lack of progress was attributed to the fact that thejsite is almost unapproachable for approx. 6 months per year (although(this should hold true for the period March-September rather than theperiod since the last mission's visit).
In Udari the construction of the OHT was deferred until sufficientlypromising water sources had been found. In addition, delays were incurredbecause the soil proved to be aggressive, so that so-called 'soil treat-ment' became necessary: the foundation plate/raft for the OHT has beencast on a foundation of lean concrete with plastic sheeting to preventcontact between the soil/ shallow groundwater and the structure itself.Similarly a brick retaining wall has been built around the raft, againwith a plastic membrane to prevent direct contact between the structureand the surrounding soil.
Commissioning of the OHT at Bannamau and Behtakalan (90% progress) wasexpected in May 1985.
The distribution systems have been virtually completed in all schemes butUdari, where approximately two-thirds of the system has been laid.
Exempted feeders have been commissioned in Thulendi, Jagatpur and Banna-mau. In Bannamau, however, over-voltage problems were experienced (at thetime of the mission's visit the Volt meter indicated 435-445 V). Accord-ing to the Jal Nigam field staff these problems will soon be over,however.In Ferozpur, Ralpur, Govindpur, Bhojpur and Behtakalan commissioning ofthe exempted feeders was expected to take place in the month of April1985 itself, whereas for Ashrafpur commissioning was expected in May
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
11
1985. For Udari not even a target date for commissioning had been givenby the State Electricity Board, so that commissioning before the end ofthe year is highly unlikely.
A total of 1059 public standposts had been constructed, or: approx. 57percent of the calculated requirements (1842 standposts). 310 of theseare of the so-called 'vandal-proof type.
Final commissioning of the schemes in Rae Bareli District is expected inthe period May-September 1985, with the exception of Udari (expectedcommissioning in March 1986).
Detailed, scheme-wise data on the progress of the individual schemes isgiven in Annex F.
2.1.3. Progress of schemes in Allahabad District
The mission visited the Nidura scheme and discussed the progress of theDCP schemes in Allahabad District with the UP Jal Nigam field staff.
Except for the public standposts and the exempted feeder in Pratappur theschemes have all been commissioned. In Pratappur the month of commission-ing of the exempted feeder can not be predicted with accuracy; it isexpected somewhere between the end of 1985 and mid-1986. For Urwa noexempted feeder is required.
The total number of constructed public standposts amounts to 248 or: 38percent of the requirements according to the revised scheme set-up (649public standposts in total). A total of 162 standposts were reported tobe 'vandal-proof .
Detailed, scheme-wise data are given in Annex F.
2.1.4. Progress of schemes in Varanasi District
In Varanasi District progress has been the most pronounced of the threedistricts. Whereas at the time of the mission's last visit a number ofOHT were still under construction, these have all been completed by now,as have the distribution systems.
Exempted feeders have been commissioned in all schemes except Harhua(back-up power by means of a gen-set) and Vyasnagar (railway crossingstill to be approved). In Mirzamurad and Biraonkot the exempted feedershave been re-commissioned, but in the former there is trouble again, dueto the presence of dacoits in the area.In Kandwa the exempted feeder does not provide power for more than 6 - 7hours a day. According to the Jal Nigam field staff this situation isexpected to improve in the near future, however.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
12
The total number of public standposts according to the revised projectset-up is 1868. Of these, a total of 794, or: 43 percent, has beenconstructed, none of which are of the so-called 'vandal-proof type.Detailed, scheme-wise data on the progress of the individual schemes isgiven in Annex F.
2.2. Public standposts and private connections
2.2.1. Present public standpost situation
As can be deducted from the above paragraphs on the physical progress ofthe DCP schemes, public standposts are the major item where progress isunsatisfactory.In the mission's report UP-10 it was already indicated that the manage-ment of the U.P. Jal Nigam had issued a directive to temporarily 'freeze'the numbers of constructed public standposts, in order to boost thenumber of applications for private connections. The reason for this is
1 the fact that private connections are the only important revenue earners'in a rural water supply scheme, and in this way it was hoped to attain atleast some degree of financial viability of the operation and maintenanceof the schemes.
The U.P. Jal Nigam policy to (temporarily) restrict the number of publicstandposts was aimed at boosting the number of applications for privateconnections. Presently, the situation regarding private connections inthe DCP schemes is as indicated in table 2.1.
However understandable this might be, duringlthe visit of mission UP-10it was agreed that this directive would be withdrawn, and that therequired numbers of public standposts would be constructred without &, <JM « J ,3further delay. cxr\rV
During the visit of mission UP-12 it became clear, however, that the UPJal Nigam field staff was as reluctant as ever to construct the addition-ally required numbers of standposts, and that the earlier mentionedmanagement directive had not been withdrawn either. As a result, thenumber of constructed public standposts had increased from a total of1276 at the time of mission UP-10, to 2101 at present, whereas the totalrequired number according to the revised project set-up amounts to 4411.|The degree of realization of the target is thus less than 48 percent.This does not even take into account, that the required number of publicstandposts has been based on estimated, rather than actual populationdata, and not on the target population or immediate population, not evenon the present population, but on the population at the time of therevision of the scheme, i.e. 1981. Actual required numbers of publicstandposts may thus be even higher!
2.2.2. Private connections
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
13
Table 2.1 - Private connections in DCP schemes
Scheme name:
FerozpurRalpurGovindpurBhojpurThulendiJagatpurAshrafpurUdariBannamauBehtakalan
RAE BARELI
SaidabadNiduraPratappurUrwa
ALLAHABAD
MirzamuradTikriSewapuriHarhuaBiraonkotVyasnagarRohaniaKandwa
VARANASI
SUB-PROJECT EAST I
r that especially in.ranasi District, the
Private connectionsTarget RealizedNos. Nos. Percent
3805364765567517356336879841205
6943
337300416290
1343
580410215550600550600555
4060
12346
Allahabadtargeted
1309710730025704009085
944
384384120355
1243
554450160550300300644245
3203
5390
Districtnumber of
34%18% -22%54%3%10%6%0%9%7%
14%
114%128%29%122%
93%
96%110%74%100%50%55%107%44%
79%
44%
, and to a lesser eprivate connection
almost been reached, and in several schemes even surpassed. Hardly anyreasons exist, therefore, to continue with the policy of restricting thenumbers of public standposts, apart even from the fact that such policyhad been promised to be abolished already at the time of mission UP-10'svisit.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
14
I1
2.2.3. Estimate of required numbers of public standpostsV H K _ _ _ _ V M _ _ _ _ _ « _ _ _ _ « W W « W « K M _ _ _ _ « W W « W « « W B « « « K « K « « M * W M « _ _ « ~ « V
The numbers of public standposts as required according to the abovemen-tioned 'revised project set-up1 have been calculated in district-wise"Statements of Standposts", that were handed over to the mission on May5, 1982. These reports showed a break-down of each revenue village in therespective schemes into hamlets and core villages, indicating also thenumbers of SC/ST and other population for each of these habitations.
According to the agreed criteria:
at least one standpost for the SC/ST population and one for theremaining population, at each viLljige or hamletnot more than 250 people per tap (with the possibility of multi-tap standpostsmaximum walking distance of 150 meters
the numbers of public standposts as required per scheme were calculated,with the following results:
Table 2.2 - Numbers of standposts according to revised set-up
District
Rae BareliAllahabadVaranasi'
TOTAL
Projectedpopulation
21255593459302115
608129
Public standpostsoriginal revisedestimate estimate
841179400
1420
18596771875
4411
The projected population, when compared with the scheme-wise populationprojections, appears to be the 1981 population, rather than the targetpopulation or even the population at the expected time of commissioningof the scheme.
In order to assess the numbers of public standposts that would be re-quired to cater for the present or expected population under the samecriteria as mentioned earlier, a new calculation has been carried out inthis report, using the population break-down given in the "Statements ofStandposts".
Using the tehsil-wise growth rates in the period 1971-1981 the 1981population of the individual schemes had already been calculated inreport UP-8 of February 1983 (Table 2.1 , page 13-14).
As a rule these calculated population totals differ from those mentionedin the "Statements of Standposts" of May 1982. Therefore, the populationdata per village or hamlet have been adjusted, with a constant factor per
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIt
15
IIII
scheme, in order to bring the total 1981 population at the level men-tioned in report UP-8.Thereafter, the required numbers of public standposts have been calcu-lated, according to the criteria as mentioned before.
Using the annual growth rate as following from the tehsil-wise growthover the period 1971-1981, the total population per scheme has also beencalculated for the year of the expected commissioning of the schemes(situation 1986), for 1991, and for the original target year 2011. As nodetailed data are available, it has been assumed that each hamlet andvillage in a particular scheme grows at the same rate. Although theactual situation will undoubtedly be different, it is felt that thisapproximation is warranted, especially in view of the limited data avail-able.
Table 2.3 shows the results of these calculations. As could be expected,the total number of public standposts required at commissioning of theschemes is larger than according to the so-called revised estimate, viz.1631 + 3078 = 4709 rather than 4411. It is also clear that, due to therelatively large number of small habitations, the number of requiredpublic standposts grows considerably slower than the population of theschemes: whereas the population is expected to grow with a factor 2.02between 1981 and 2011, the total number of standposts grows with a factorof not more than 1.50. As a result, the average number of people perpublic standpost would grow from 138 in 1981 to 186 in the year 2011.
Table 2.3 also shows that at all times the average number of people perstandpost is smaller for the SC/ST population than for the rest of thepeople. This may be explained by the fact that the SC/ST people as a rulelive in smaller habitations.This is also shown by the fact that between 33 and 35 percent of thetotal number of public standposts is planned in SC/ST quarters, althoughtheir contribution to the total population is lower: approx. 28 percent.
2.2.4. Comparison of required and realized numbers of standposts
In order to compare the number of standposts that had been constructed atthe time of the mission's visit, with the required number according totable 2.3, the requirements per 1986 have been taken as the basis forcomparison.
Table 2.4 indicates the 1986 requirements, per scheme, and for the SC/STand remaining population separately. It also indicates the actual numbersof public standposts (PS) and house connections (HC) as realized at thetime of the mission's visit.
In order to calculate the actual requirements it had to be taken intoaccount that a part of the population is served by private connections,so that the actually required number of standposts is lower than indi-cated for 1986 in table 2.3. A correction of this number was thus deter-mined, by first estimating the number of people that is served by theprivate connections, and 'translating' that number into numbers of public
Table 2.3 - Determination of required numbers of public standposts
Year:
Scheme name:
198]
PEOPLE: STANDPOSTS:SC/ST rest SC/ST rest
1986
PEOPLE: STANDPOSTS:SC/ST rest SC/ST rest
1991 2011
PEOPLE: STANDPOSTS: PEOPLE: STANDPOSTS:SC/ST rest SC/ST rest SC/ST rest SC/ST rest
FerozpurRalpurGovindpurBhojpurTlmlendiJagatpurAshrafpurUdariBannamauBehtakalan
RAE BARELI
SaidabadNiduraPratappurUrwa
ALLAHABAD
TikriSewapuriHArhuaBiraonkotMirzamuradRohaniaVyasnagarKandwa
VARANASI
DCP TOTAL:
People/SP:
3897549255215632764663485319692295005451
6172830%
6651365561635595
2206424%
143406286128691390013000724490046092
8273527%
16652728%
SC/ST108
9736115881265314539124451734010685102831875124384
14240470%
16939166952310814672
7141476%
2641015203256252819125671344273165532078
21926073%
43307872%
rest154
519144478197828610173
75341%
51494256
19831%
8939969383496969
58731%
153835%
71110687710516598118128149
108959%
11896131106
45169%
11878140168181185157254
128169%
282165%
Total138
4313 107766038 127406541 149916138 158458588 139787028 191977051 141657796 1158110330 203896102 27297
69925 16095830% 70%
8234 209714272 195137610 285347209 18906
27326 8792424% 76%
17528 322817263 1756515412 3069016688 3384615586 307788698 4133710252 360447315 38516
98742 26105627% 73%
195992 50993C-28% 72%
SC/ST rest120 165
529246478397868710274
76640%
57494564
21529%
1074310210992557270
65032%
163135%
791148383110170106119133163
116060%
130108156132
52671%
14189162190190200171258
140168%
308765%
Total150
4660 116436524 137657067 161976632 171209371 152527593 207427858 157858688 1290611161' 220296593 29494
76147 17493330% 70%
9408 239604782 218418695 326008345 21885
31230 10028624% 76%
19686 362568157 1972817311 3446918743 3801417505 345689769 4642811314 397768215 43259
110700 29249827% 73%
21877 56771728% 72%
SC/ST rest128 173
529248478698868910575
77839%
61505164
22628%
1264610811397597572
69632%
170034%
801158991114170112124142173
121061%
145122172137
57672%
15998174203198219184261
149668%
328266%
Total158
6352 158698890 187599632 220759039 2333313284 2162110349 2826912119 2434513400 1990615211 300238986 40196
107262 24439631% 69%
16029 408237506 3428514813 5554114985 39295
53333 16994424% 76%
31327 5769512981 3139427546 5485129827 6049227856 5500715546 7388216779 5898913073 68839
174935 46114928% 72%
335530 87548928% 72%
SC/ST rest158 199
58 92100 13158 10957 11397 135105 192103 140103 141114 17782 210
877 144038% 62%
84 20258 16575 26490 217
307 84827% 73%
174 24364 145149 253168 307134 25981 32590 26185 317
945 211031% 69%
2129 439833% 67%
Total186
Table 2.4 - Comparison of required and actual numbers of standposts
1986 requirementsNon-SC/ST
PEOPLE :
Scheme name:
FerozpurRalpurGovindpurBhojpurThulendiJagatpurAshrafpurUdariBannamaufiehtakalan
RAE BARELI
SaidabadNiduraPratappurUrwa
ALLAHABAD
TikriSewapuriHarhuaBiraonkotNirzarouradRohaniaVyasnagarKandwa
VARANASI
DCP TOTAL:
SC/ST
43136038654161388588702870517796103306102
6992530%
8234427276107209
2732624%
1752872631541216688155868698102527315
9874227%
195992
rest
10776127401499115845139781919714165115812038927297
16095870%
20971195132853418906
8792476%
3228117565306903384630778413373604438516
26105673%
509938
STANDPOSTS :SC/ST
529246478397868710274
76640%
57494564
21529%
1074310210992557270
65032%
1631
rest
791148383110170106119133163
116060%
130108156132
52671%
14189162190190200171258
140168%
3087
total
131206129130193267192206235237
1926100%
187157201196
741100%
248132264299282255243328
2051100%
4718
mintotal
1001818890156243167192207168
1592
143108126157
534
13479173207146114121120
1094
3220
Actualpeople perPS
13611218119112711313497153167
139
161181183143
167
229197189178162207211149
186
165
HC
7777777777
7
7777
7
77777777
7
7
PS
481055684651606018240223
1059
77705546
248
956013011012910070100
794
2101
1985HC
1309710730025704009085
944
384384120355
1243
450160550300554644300245
3203
5390
CorrPS
551116095661646218244227
1102
94856063
302
1096615012215312280111
913
2317
required Pace. to
calc.
42%54%47%73%34%61%32%9%
104%96%
57%
50%54%30%32%
41%
44%50%57%41%54%48%33%34%
45%
49%
min.
55%61%68%106%42%67%37%9%
118%135%
69%
66%79%48%40%
57%
81%84%87%59%105%107%66%93%
83%
72%
Percentage of Number ofhabitationswith non-ST/SCpopulation
48894243731468110510594
826
86598193
319
2736719854594950
444
1589
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
18
standposts. For estimating the number of people served by private connec-tions, the household size was fixed at 7 persons. For calculating thecorresponding reduction in required numbers of public standposts, theaverage number of people per standpost for the respective scheme, and forthe nOn-SC/ST population was taken. The reason for this is that there arerelatively large differences in this number, as well between the indi-vidual schemes, as well as between the SC/ST and non-SC/ST population.This can easily-be seen from the eighth column of table 2.4, where theaverage number of people per public standpost ranges from a minimum of 97(Udari scheme) to a maximum of 229 (Tikri).
From table 2.4 it appears that the realized numbers of private connec-tions are equivalent with 216 public standposts, thus bringing the totalequivalent number of standposts at 2317, rather than 2101. It must beemphasized, however, that this calculation may be rather optimistic.Although the effect of smaller habitations on the less than proportionalvariation of the number of standposts has already been partly accountedfor by using scheme-wise averages for the population per standpost, theeffect of reducing the population to be served by discounting those witha private connection might in individual cases be next to negligible(e.g. when that population is spread evenly over the entire population).
IIAssuming that those who can afford a private connection will live in moreor less the same area, the approach followed may still be considered a
'I realistic one, albeit resulting in minimum requirements.
Comparing the thus calculated required number of public standposts showsthat the presently constructed number of standposts is only 49 percent ofthe required (corrected) total.
According to the policy of temporarily restricting the numbers of publicstandposts as earlier advocated by the U.P. Jal Nigam, and according to
I the explications given to the mission then, all SC/ST population should'be provided with standposts according to the agreed criteria (hardly anyprivate connections are expected in this group anyhow), whereas for the
I remaining population at least one public standpost should be erected inleach habitation, regardless of its size.
When this approach would be adhered to (which is not the case, as ex-plained earlier), the required number of standposts would be those forthe SC/ST population (column 3 of table 2.4) plus the number of vil-lages/hamlets where non-SC/ST population is living (last column of table2.3), resulting in a total of 3220 public standposts.
Even though the thus calculated number of standposts would constitute thebare minimum, it appears that the actually realized number is even lower:only 72 percent of this, with the lowest percentages being shown forAllahabad District.
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
19
2.2.5. Conclusions
From the above it will be clear that constructing the remaining publicistandposts according to the revised project set-up is strictly necessary,land that in fact the number should still be higher, to take into accountthe increase in population since 1981.
In view of the attitude of the U.P. Jal Nigam field staff it may beexpected that no extension of the number of public standposts will takeplace in the near future, so that the presently ongoing implementation[should preferably result in a number of standposts that is sufficientjalso for the near future. It seems highly unlikely that that can berealized, however.
Taking the above into account, the mission strongly recommends that bothfthe Indian and the Netherlands Governments emphasize the importance of| constructing the agreed numbers of public standposts. It also suggeststhat no further delays in implementing the DCP schemes under Sub-ProjectI (East) are agreed with, by deciding to withhold reimbursement of claimsrelated to implementation activities after January 1, 1986.In view of special circumstances, exceptions could be made for the Udarischeme and for the commissioning of some exempted feeders, however.
2.3. Power supply
In chapter 2.2 for each of the districts the situation regarding theexempted feeders is mentioned. From that information it is clear that inRae Bareli, where only 3 schemes had been provided with exempted feedersby the time of the mission's visit, for 5 schemes such feeders wereexpected to be commissioned in the month of April itself, and for onemore scheme in May (Ashrafpur). Only in one case no specific month forcommissioning the feeder could be given (Udari).
In Allahabad 3 out of 4 schemes require exempted feeders, 2 of which havebeen commissioned. Only for the Pratappur scheme such a feeder is stillrequired. The probable month of commissioning of that feeder could not bedetermined more accurately than to be within the period end of 1985 -mid-1986.
For Varanasi, out of 7 schemes, 6 were to be provided with exemptedfeeders, as the remaining scheme (Harhua) has been provided with a back-up generator set. For 5 schemes the feeders have been commissioned; intwo of these even re-commissioned after problems caused by theft ofwires. Similar problems still exist in Mirzamurad.In Vyasnagar commissioning of the exempted feeder awaits permission fromthe Railway Authority for a railway crossing. The second tubewell of thisscheme has power for more than 22 hours daily because of its proximity toa fertilizer factory, however.
Power supply through rural feeders continues to be a problem: in thePratappur scheme over-all power availability during March 1985 was 380.5hours, or 12.3 hours per day. Because of problems with either too high or
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
20
too low voltages, or because of power on a single phase only, the effec-tive number of hours during which pumps could be run was considerablysmaller: 95.9 hours, or: 3.1 hours/day.
Similarly, the availability of power amounted approx. 6 hours/day for theHarhua scheme, 4.2 hours/day for the Bhojpur scheme, and 5.1 hours/dayfor the Ferozpur scheme.
Problems with incorrect voltages or limited power supply appear not to berestricted to rural feeders, however: also several exempted feedersexperienced problems.In Kandwa the total number of power hours in the month of March 1985, viaan exempted feeder, amounted to only 480 (15.5 hours/day), of which onlyduring 258 hours (8.3 hours/day) the power was of the correct voltage.In Rohania the availability of power over the exempted feeder was 458.5hours per month in March 1985, or: 14.8 hours/day.In Mirzamurad power over the exempted feeder was available for only 291hours in March 1985 (9.4 hours/day), of which only during 224 hours (7.3hours/day) at the correct voltage.In Nidura power over the exempted feeder was available for only 564.5hours.during the month of March 1985, or: 18.2 hours/day.
Although the power situation is undoubtedly better when an exemptedfeeder is available, it is still far from the uninterrupted supply it issupposed to be. Also the fact that over- and under-voltages render thepower unsuitable at times for running the pumps is to be taken intoaccount.
This also means that the design conditions of a maximum of 16 hours'pumping per day cannot be met by the majority of DCP schemes, even whenprovided with exempted feeders. Although this is not as bad as it mightappear (16 hours' pumping per tubewell is normally not required beforethe second half of the design period of the schemes) it is a factor to betaken into account when the feasibility of various ways of ascertainingpower supply (e.g. by means of back-up gen-sets) is determined.
It is strongly recommended that the U.P. Jal Nigam maintain frequentcontacts with its counterparts of the State Electricity Board, to ascer-tain as uninterrupted a power supply to the rural water supply schemes aspossible. Setting up committees on a district level in which all partiesconcerned participate (e.g. also the Railway Authority, being the autho-rity to approve railway crossings of pipes and power lines) might be animportant step in that direction.
According to information obtained from the U.P Jal Nigam, on April 14,1985 a task force has been formed by the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister, inwhich representatives of the Jal Nigam, the Jal Sansthans and the StateElectricity Board participate. According to directives from the ChiefMinister, as soon as a site for a tubewell to be used for water supplyhas been selected, power should be made available by the S.E.B. within 24hours(!).
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
21
Although the latter appears to be wishful thinking rather than realistic,it appears that at least a start has been made with improving the powersupply conditions for rural water supply schemes.
2.4. Supply hours
The number of supply hours for the rural water supply schemes is, bydefinition, influenced by any constraints in the availability of powerand hence in pumping hours.
In the Kandwa scheme, pumping hours were thus restricted to 258 hours inMarch 1985, or: 8.3 hours/day. The total volume of water supplied wasapprox. 32502 m3, or: approx. 26 litres per head and per day.
In the Rohania scheme, the total number of pumping hours amounted to 300in March 1985, which resulted in 135 supply hours, or: 4.35 hours/day. Atotal volume of approx. 60000 m3 was supplied, which is equivalent toabout 39 Ipcd.
In Mirzamurad, the total number of pumping hours (for both tubewellstogether) amounted to 245 for March 1985. The- supplied volume of water,27930 m3, was equivalent to approx. 26 Ipcd.
Not all restrictions in the number of supply hours are caused by limitedavailability of power at the correct voltage, however: in many cases thenumber of supply hours is purposely limited, for a number of reasons.These often have to do with the way in which the schemes are operated,which sometimes is by twice daily filling the overhead reservoir andthereafter allowing water to be abstracted during a period of 3 to 4hours, one in the early morning and one in the afternoon.
Other reasons given are the fact that water supplied during these limitedperiods is sufficient, and quite acceptable to the population, providedthat water is available at regular times.
Insufficient data is available to either prove or reject these assump-tions. It is a fact, however, that they are not in conformity with thedesign criteria mentioned in the project reports as well as in the"Manual on Water Supply and Treatment" from the Ministry of Works andHousing in New Delhi. That does not necessarily mean that for that reason
*" I Ithey are not correct, but it is at the very least inconsistent to design v ?-.t'|r *"°schemes on the basis of criteria that are not valid or followed in "practice.
It is recommended, therefore, that investigations of a more fundamentalnature are carried out on design criteria to be used for rural watersupply schemes, as mentioned in the "Introduction and summary" (Chapter1) of this report.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
22
It is also recommended that, pending the establishment of other designcriteria, those that have been used in the designs are adhered to, alsoduring operation and maintenance of the schemes. In that way it can beprevented that sizes and capacities of components of the schemes becomeincompatible with the method of operating the schemes.An example to that effect may be the size of the overhead reservoirs,that would become insufficient if the number of supply and/or pumpinghours would be reduced but the per capita water demand retained.This aspect has been delt with in more detail in earlier mission reports,e.g. in report UP-8 of February 1983 (paragraphs 2.10 and 2.11).
2.5. Project duration
In spite of the U.P. Jal Nigam's assurance that the estimated months ofcommissioning of the schemes as mentioned to Mission No. 10 were realis-tic, and that no more delays were anticipated, commissioning of mostschemes will again be later than was estimated at that time.
The main reason for delays has been the backlog in construction of publicstandposts which, as has been explained before, is due to a Jal Nigammanagement decision rather than physical constraints during construction.In addition, the delay in commissioning the exempted feeders has delayedthe final commissioning of a number of schemes that could otherwise becommissioned.
Table 2.5 shows that most of the schemes are now expected to be commis-sioned by September 1985, weheras the Udari scheme is expected to takeuntil March 1986 to be completed.
The indicated months of commissioning include most but not all of theadditional works such as laboratories, inspection house, etc.
IIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiii
23
Table 2.5 - Estimated commissioning of DCP schemes
District Scheme
Probable month of commissioningas estimated per:
Original October 1984 April 1985
RAE BARELI
ALLAHABAD
VARANASI
FerozpurRalpurGovindpurBhojpurThulendiJagatpurAshrafpurUdariBannamauBehtakalan
SaidabadNiduraPratappurUrwa
MirzamuradTikriSewapuriHarhuaBiraonkotVyasnagarRohaniaKandwa
3-823-823-823-823-823-823-823-823-823-82
3-823-823-823-82
3-823-823-823-823-823-823-823-82
3-853-853-853-853-853-853-859-853-853-85
3-853-853-853-85
3-853-853-853-853-853-853-853-85
7-857-857-857-859-857-859-853-865-856-85
7-857-857-85*)7-85
9-859-859-859-859-859-859-859-85
-*)•-*)~'O•*)-*)-*)-*)-*)
Note: *) commissioning except for exempted feeder**) assuming that construction of remaining standposts is started
forthwith
The mission was disappointed to establish that commissioning of theschemes had again been delayed for most of the schemes and requested theUP Jal Nigam to do its utmost to prevent any further delays.
2.6. Project costs
The quarterly report covering the progress up to March 1985 was not yetavailable at the time of the mission's visit. As a result of this onlythe actual expenditures up to January 1985 could be obtained, as shown intable 2.6 below.
The U.P. Jal Nigam promised to make available the financial details ofthe quarter ending March 1985, as well as a revised disbursement schedulefor the remainder of the project implementation period by mid-May 1985.
II1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
24
Although expenditures during the last two quarters of the year 1984 haveundoubtedly increased as compared to the quarter ending June 1984, actualexpenditures have lagged behind those foreseen at the time of mission UP-10 (Rs 6.7 million for the quarter ending September 1984, and Rs. 12.77million for the quarter ending December 1984). This reflects the delaysin physical implementation of the projects described in earlier para-graphs of this report.
Actual expenditures as well as expenditures expected by the time of thelast mission's visit, are shown graphically in Fig. 2.1.
Table 2.6. - Expenditures Sub-Project I (East)
Claimdated
../../..10/09/8118/09/8105/12/8120/04/8215/06/8201/10/8221/12/8209/03/8326/03/8303/06/8303/10/8309/12/8313/02/8402/04/8419/05/8424/08/8415/11/8415/03/8501/05/85
ClaimNo.
1234567891011121314151617181920
Periodending
Dec'80Mar'81Jun'81Sep'81Dec'81Mar'82Jun'82Sep'82Dec'82Feb'83Mar'83Jun'83Sep'83Dec'83Feb'84Mar'84Jun'84Sep'84Dec'84Mar'85
Claimed(Rs.)
23,874,003.3220,626,368.347,237,917.756,151,065.865,276,059.2510,371,068.297,634,362.728,147,685.135,036,836.793,044,948.719,043,650.962,665,345.714,377,681.784,358,212.735,613,486.944,546,211.711,420,427.153,911,116.396,069,167.388,214,949.32
Cumulative(Rs.)
23,874,003.3244,500,371.6651,738,289.4157,889,355.2763,165,414.5273,536,482.8181,170,845.5389,318,530.6694,355,367.4597,400,316.16106,443,967.12109,109,312.83113,486,994.61117,845,207.34123,458,694.28128,004,905.99129,425,333.14133,336,449.53139,405,616.91147,619,566.23
The mission scrutinized reimbursement claims for the periodending December 1984 and found no inconsistencies with thephysical progress of the schemes.
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
III
II
200 -
150 -
100 -
enCC.
§
XO)
.2rsEo
50 -
0
25
actual expendituresanticipated in June'84progress report
10
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985
Fig. 2.1 . Expenditures Sub-Project I (East), Uttar Pradesh
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
26
3. SUB-PROJECT III (HAND PUMP SCHEMES)
3.1. Status of Sub-Project III
The mission was informed that in all villages covered by the proposedhand pump schemes under Sub-Project III (East and West Uttar Pradesh) oneor two hand pumps had been placed in each village, as an immediate reliefmeasure. These hand pumps are no part of the proposed Sub-Project, whichaims to saturate the respective villages with hand pumps, according tothe agreed criteria.
Pending the official approval and exchange of side letters on this Sub-Project, no further action has been taken by the U.P. Jal Nigam.
3.2. Procurement procedures and quality control measures
For the procurement of hand pumps the following procedures are followedby the U.P. Jal Nigam:
only pumps made according to Indian standard ISI 9301-1984 ("Spe-cification for deep-well hand pumps (Second revision)" are pur-chased, from manufacturers that are entitled to carry the ISImark. This means that random sampling is carried out by ISIofficers, at the manufacturer's worksAccording to a UNICEF circular "Qualified Suppliers of India Mk-II hand pumps and spare parts" the ISI mark is not necessarilysufficient proof of a guaranteed quality of the pumps. Hence anadditional inspection is carried out by UNICEF-appointedagencies, in this case first Crown Agents, and presently SGS(Societe Generale de Surveillance) of SwitzerlandUpon recipt on site a visual check is carried out by the U.P. JalNigam field staffInstructions will be given to pay additional attention to thegalvanization of the various materials.
Formerly, pre-delivery checks were carried out by Jal Nigam officers atthe manufacturer's works, but since there is no guarantee that the samegoods that have been checked are sent to the field, this kind of checkwas replaced by a check upon delivery on-site.
For other materials almost the same procedure is followed, with thedifference that no pre-delivery check by a UNICEF-appointed agency iscarried out, but that samples of received materials are sent to testinginstitutes for quality checks.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIa
27
4. SUB-PROJECT IV (EAST)
4.1. General aspects
During earlier contacts between the U.P. Jal Nigam and the Water SupplyCoordinator at the Royal Netherlands Embassy, a summary proposal for 11rural water supply schemes was handed over, covering the followingschemes:
Varanasi District:
Gyanpur Tehsil: Inargaon scheme-2°Kasidaha scheme^- >'Rohi scheme ——— Bairibisa scheme-—l'}-Biranpur scheme —17
Varanasi Tehsil: Jansa scheme ———. ,Hathi Barni scheme-^ InAwajapur scheme -i|b\Mahadapur scheme — 7 J
Allahabad District:^
Manihanpur Tehsil: Chhekawa scheme -—— |iKosam Khiraj scheme— ?
Mission Up-12 received a "Report for Pre-appraisal of Sub-Project II(East)(revised), Instalment-I for Varanasi and Allahabad Districts" ofApril 1985, a copy of which is attached to this report as Annex G.
The report covers the earlier mentioned schemes in Allahabad and Varanasidistricts, with the exception of the Mahadapur and Kosam Khiraj schemes,of which the project reports could not be completed in time.
Salient features of the proposed schemes are indicated below:
Table 4.1 - Main data of proposed schemes under Sub-Project IV
No.
123456789
Scheme
InargaonKasidahaRohiBairibisaBiranpurJansaHathi BarniAwajapurChhekawa
Villagescovered
201135171724
. 261611
Design population(2017)
365003263038942366802680025415258601990026530
Project costs(Rs millions)
7.9657.2318.9647.8867.2886.2956.3136.2219.023
Total: 202 319600 67.206
I1IIIII1IIIIIII
28
I
I
4.2. Design criteria
The design criteria used for preparing the proposed schemes are similarto those used in Sub-Project I (East), viz.:
design period 30 yearsdesign population: to be discussed separately (paragraph 4.3)per capita water demand: 70 Ipcdwater source: at least 2 tubewells per scheme; no tubewell to runfor more than 16 hours per day. Tubewells bored in the area, bothby the U.P. Jal Nigam and the Irrigation Department, are of rea-sonable depth (100 - 150 m), giving a safe discharge of 1400 -2200 litres/minute. The water quality is reported to be withinsafe limitstreatment of the water restricted to safety chlorinationpumping plant of the submersible typepower supply: based on a feasibility study for the individualschemes, in all cases power supply through exempted feeder provedthe most economical. Negotiations with the State ElectricityBoard on the provision of such exempted feeders have been startedalreadycentralized storage in overhead reservoirs at the headworkssites, with a minimum capacity equivalent to at least 8 hours'supplysupply from the OHT to be under gravity, using a simple,branched, distribution networkto prevent delays in implementation, distribution networks havebeen laid out in such a way that railway crossings could bepreventeddistribution mains calculated for a peak factor of 2.4, and usingthe Hazen-Williams formula with C-factors of 100 for galvanizedor cast iron pipes, and 120 for asbestos-cement or PVC pipesresidual water pressures at the periphery of the schemes to be atleast 6 m wenumbers of public standposts based on one standpost per 250persons. These are to be provided to the scheduled caste popula-tion and the 'weaker section of society1 in each village/hamlet,even if the population is less than 250 persons, while ensuringthat the users do not have to walk more than 150 m to fetch waterfrom standposts.
This criterion does not exactly conform with those agreed on (butnot yet fully implemented) for Sub-Project East I, in that itleaves open the possibility that the non-SC/ST population in ananuet or village is not provided with a seyafraTe~~s~CatTo!pos'i:rTn a
, UAVYN smaller village or hamlet (bL'/ST population provided with one orW* .v.'.rKr/ymore standposts; total number of people less than 250 per stand-
post, but no standposts for the non-SC/ST people)..Although thissituation, even if it would occur, would not necessarily beproblematic, it might have undesirable effects. A more precisedescription of the way in which the required number of public
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
standposts is determined may thus have to be included in therelevant side letter.all public standposts are to be of the 'vandal-proof pillar type
Summarizing, the proposed schemes are according to the proven design thatis also used in Sub-Project I (East). Only the required numbers of publicstandposts and the population projections used need to be adapted.Population projections are discussed in the next paragraph.
4.4. Population projections
The determination of the design population to be taken into account forthe proposed schemes has been a subject of lengthy discusssions thatstarted even before the end of the year 1984.At that time Mr. A.K. Gupta, Manager Appraisal, U.P. Jal Nigam, met withMessrs. A.K. Sen Gupta (Asstt. Adviser, CPHEEO) and J.A. Speets (WaterSupply Coordinator at the Royal Netherlands Embassy) in New Delhi, todiscuss the way in which the target population for the schemes was to bedetermined.It was argued that extrapolating the growth experienced in the decadebetween the 1971 and 1981 census would lead to unrealistically highpopulation figures, and reasons were presented at that time (though notlaid down in writing) for adopting a lower growth rate.
It was, therefore, proposed to accept a linear extrapolation of thepopulation growth on the basis of the 1971 and 1981 census data. As nomore detailed data were said to be available, tehsil-wise growth figureswere to be used as the basis for this forecast. It was further shownthat, even when the compound (annual) growth rate following from the 1971and 1981 census data were to be used, the design populations calculatedwith the linear-growth method would result in minor reductions in life-time of the schemes, i.e. from 30 years to approx. 25 years.
On the basis of this information it was agreed to accept the proposedmethod (see also letter No. 133/JS/hm, of January 4, 1985, from the RoyalNetherlands Embassy to the Managing Director of the U.P. Jal Nigam).
During the discussions of April 1985 in Lucknow, the mission receivedinformation that prompted it not to accept the earlier agreed method.
First, Mr. A.K. Gupta was on leave, and the argumentation presented byhim in December 1984 could not be reproduced by any of the other membersof the Appraisal Wing of the U.P.Jal Nigam.
Secondly, it appeared that the calculations that had shown that theresulting lifetimes of the schemes were still in the order of 25 years,even when using the compound growth rate, actually referred to remaininglifetime after the year 1981, so in fact showed a picture that was 4 to 5years optimistic.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
30
Finally, it appeared that for each of the villages in the proposedschemes census data for 1981, 1971, 1961 and in most cases also for 1951were available, so that more accurate population growth rates than basedon tehsil-wise totals could be calculated.
The mission therefore decided to check the influence of adopting thesepopulation growth rates on the design population of the schemes, or,conversely, to check what effect adopting the proposed target populationswould have on the expected lifetimes of the schemes.
Table 4.2 shows the population of the area to be covered by the proposedschemes, in the years 1951, 1961, 1971 and 1981, in as far as data wereavailable at the time of the discussions in Lucknow. As this was not thecase for the Chhekawa scheme (Allahabad), this scheme is not includedhere.For each of the three decades 1951-1961, 1961-1971 and 1971-1981 theannual growth rate (compound method) has been calculated. For comparisonthe tehsil-wise decade growth and the resulting annual growth rate overthe last decade have been added.
The table shows that for 5 out of 8 schemes the scheme-wise annualpopulation growth rate over the period 1971-1981 is higher than thataccording to the tehsil-wise population figures, thus warranting arecalculation of the target population.
Table 4.2 - Growth rates based on scheme population or tehsil
Scheme
Scheme-wiseCensus population
1951 1961 1971 1981
Scheme-wiseAnnual growth rate
Tehsil-wisegrowth rate'71-'81 annual
RohiKasidahaBirampurBairibisaInargaonAwajapurHathi BarniJansa
?6693565684187275688581996190
1026471636674102379899793788457743
1261510267770212946123748884105979900
1763514774121291661116393112581329413057
0113102
9
.68%
.67%
.98%-13%.43%.76%.26%
2 . 08%3.67%1.44%2 . 38%2.26%1.13%1 . 82%2.49%
3.41%3.71%4.65%2.52%2.85%2 . 40%2 . 29%2.81%
3333333333212626
.56%
.56%
.56%
.56%
.56%
.29%
.26%
.26%
2.94%2.94%2.94%2.94%2.94%1 . 95%2.36%2.36%
In table 4.3 the actual growth rates used in the project reports havebeen calculated and compared to growth rates following from the censusfigures for the villages included in the various schemes.
In order to check the possible influence of extraordinary high populationgrowth in the last decade only, scheme-wise annual growth rates have beencalculated for the last 10, 20 and 30 years preceding the 1981 census.Again it is clear that the annual growth rates following from the pro-posed scheme designs are lower than whatever growth rate is calculatedfrom the census figures, in all but one case (Hathi Barni scheme whencompared with the average growth over the period 1951-1981).
tIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
•\
31
Table 4.3 - Comparison of growth rates used
Census Design population Compound growth rate according topopulation project report designs census
Scheme 1981 1987 2002 2017 '81-' 17 '71-'81 '6l-'81 !51-'81
RohiKasidahaBirampurBairibisaInargaonAwajapurHathi BarniJansaChhekawa
176351477412129166111639311258132941305713746
211871776014570199601970012700154001512015877
3005425190206752832028000163002063020275N.A.
389423263026800366803650019900258602541526530
2 . 22%2 . 23%2 . 23%2 . 22%2 . 25%1.59%1.87%1.87%1.84%
3.41%3.71%4.65%2.52%2.85%2.40%2.29%2.81%
9
2.74%3.69%3.03%2.45%2.55%1.76%2.06%2.65%
7
2.67%2.58%2.29%2.75%1.65%1.62%2.52%
What the influence of adopting the proposed target population would be onthe remaining lifetime of the scheme (after commissioning in 1986), whenthe actual annual population groth would remain constant at the level ofthe last 10, 20 or 30 years (calculated from 1981 onward), is shown intable 4.4. It appears that only for the Bairibisa, Inargaon and HathiBarni schemes the resulting lifetime after commissioning would be in theorder of 25 years or more, whereas that of the other schemes would beconsiderably lower, and thus unacceptable, also when the criteria asdiscussed in December 1984 would be applied.
Table 4.4 - Remaining technical lifetime of schemes
Scheme
Resulting number of years after 1986based on annual growth rate
RohiKasidahaBirampurBairibisaInargaonAwajapurHathi BarniJansa
18.616.812.526.823.519.124.319.1
24.316.921.527.726.727.627.720.5
N.A.25.026.230.024.629.836.321.8
Lengthy discussions then followed, in the field as well as in Lucknow, abouta realistic population growth rate to be adopted. It was argued that thehigh population growth rates over the last census decade could not con-tinue forever, as effects of family planning were bound to leave theirmark. In addition, it was said, the hinterland of the individual villagescould not sustain such growth in all cases.
On the other hand, no specific information could be shown that indicatedcertain restrictions in development potential of the villages. Also, itwas argued, providing a better service level in the rural areas (electri-fication, but also providing water) would curb the migration of rural
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
32
I)population to the cities, and thus even cause an increase in rural popu-lation growth. Villages along major roads also were considered to have amore or less unlimited development potential.
Finally, the census figures show that so far population growth per decadehas been rising continually, so that it is impossible to predict when, ifat all in the near future, a reverse in growth trends would occur.
Taking into account the above arguments, the mission decided on strikinga balance between adopting an exponential and a stagnating growth trend.It was agreed that target populations would be calculated by taking t.oe_arithmetic average between the population projection using the compoundgrowth method on~tRe basis ot~t:h'e~T9Tl-iy»i annual growth7..a_nd_the_JJ.neargrowth, again based on the 1971 and 1981 census populations..
Table 4.5 shows the calculated 1989 and 2019 populations, on the basis ofthe compound and the linear growth methods, as well as the selectedarithmetic average. The last two columns further show the target popula-tion mentioned in the project reports and the difference between theselected averages for 2019 and these target populations, expressed aspercentages of the selected averages. The years 1989 and 2019 have beentaken as the most likely year of commissioning of the schemes, and thetarget year, 30 years thereafter.
Table 4.5 shows that only for the Bairibisa scheme the difference betweenthe selected average and the target population proposed is negligible.For the Inargaon and Hathi Barni schemes this difference is 8% and 6%,respectively, whereas for the remaining schemes it ranges from 17% (Awa-japur scheme) to 45% (Birampur scheme).
On this basis the mission decided to approve the design populations forthe Bairibisa, Inargaon and Hathi Barni schemes only. For all otherschemes, including the Chhekawa scheme in Allahabad, the design will haveto be recast, taking the selected average for the year 2019 (table 4.5)as the design population.
The U.P. Jal Nigam, recognizing the urgency of having rural water supplyschemes implemented in the area covered by the proposed Sub-Project IV,undertook to have the revised project reports ready and appraised, aswell as processed by the Uttar Pradesh Government, by June 1985. TheMinistry of Works and Housing, in its turn, agreed to have the reportsprocessed wi-thin one month after receipt.
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
33
Table 4.5 - Selection of des ign popu la t ion
Scheme
RohiKasidahaBirampurBairibisaInargaonAvajapurHathi BarniJansa
1971pop.
1261510267770212946123748884105979900
1981pop.
1763514774121291661116393112581329413057
compound 1989 populationannual selectedgrowth compound linear average
3.41%3.71%4.65%2.52%2.85%2.40%2.29%2.81%
2305519767174422027720529136061593816293
2165118380156711954319608•131571545215583
2235319073165561991020069133821569515938
2019 populationselected
compound linear average
6298458899681194263447733276893146737380
3671131901289523053831665202792354325054
4984845400485353668639699239842750531217
Targetpopulationreports
3894232630268003668036500199002586025415
Difference
-22%-28%-45%0%-8%
-17%-6%
-19%
Table 4.6 - Summary of salient features of proposed schemes
Scheme name No. of No. of Design Capital Number of Capitalvillages scarcity population cost public private cost
villages (millions stand- connec- per headof Rs.) posts tions (Rs.)
VARANASI DISTRICTRohiKasidaha'BirampurBairibisaInargaonAwajapurHathi BarniJansa
ALLAHABAD DISTRICTChhekawa
TOTAL
3511171720162621
11
174
1211177
16?
2621
8
118
3894232630268003668036500199002586025415
26530
269257
8.9467.2317.2887.8667.9656.2416.3136.295
9.023
67.188
16010418
131106639482
83
841
16691398115715721564853
11001090
1137
11540
230222272215218314244248
340
250
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
34
4.4. Implementation schedule
The proposed schemes have a design period of 30 years, with assumedbeginning in 1987 and target year 2017. In view of the fact that not eventhe internal appraisal by the U.P. Jal Nigam had been carried out, letalone processing by the Governments of Uttar Pradesh and of India, afterwhich the procedure with the exchange of side letters between the Govern-ments of India and of The Netherlands would still have to follow, anyassumed start of the implementation of the projects before raid-1986 isoverly optimistic.
The mission therefore proposed to assume a start of the project notearlier than mid-1986, and an implementation period of 3 to 3.5 years.The U.P. Jal Nigam staff argued that implementation of the newly proposedschemes should be much faster than under Sub-Project I, for a number ofreasons:
the field staff has gained much experience with executing thiskind of schemes, including those where OHT are executed depart-mentallytenders for the execution of OHT are combined in packages thatmay be attractive also for larger contractors, thus resulting inbetter qualified contractors executing the works, in a shorterperiodexempted feeders for the various schemes have been applied foralready, to save timethe schemes have been grouped together in such a way that railwaycrossings have been prevented, as these have caused delays in thepastfinancing of the DCP schemes has been removed from the DistrictPlans and once again included in the State Plan. In this waydelays in the allocation of funds may be largely prevented.
For speeding up the implementation of DCP schemes even further, theManaging Director of the U.P. Jal Nigam contemplated to change the orga-nization in such a way that a Project Manager would be responsible solelyfor these schemes, without any other tasks. In that way, it was felt,implementation of the works could be carried out within a period of 2years.
After some discussions it was agreed that for the sake of calculating thedesign populations of the proposed schemes commissioning by the year 1989would be assumed.
4.5. Approval procedure
On the basis of the available project documents a pre-appraisa|l wasconducted, as indicated in the previous paragraphs, in line with theterms of reference of the Mission (see als Annex A).
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
35
Before the relevant detailed project documents could be made available,short descriptions of each project were presented before the discussionson bilateral assistance between the Governments of India and of TheNetherlands, in February, 1985.
The mission studied the reports and paid a few field visits to projectareas where without exception severe drought conditions were encountered,a nd was ~told that tHis adverse ._s_i.tjiaj:l a_ls...nQ_t LAlseasojiaL-Pature. butgradually
As is indicated in paragraph 4.3 the main observation point of the mis-sion was created by the non acceptable reduction in the lifespan of theschemes, due to the low population figures adopted. This point, however,was satisfactorily settled, though several projects will have to berevised and project estimates recalculated accordingly.
During the field visits and prolonged discussions with the U.P. Jal Nigamstaff, the mission arrived at the opinion that good reasons were avail-able for its recommendation to the Netherlands Government to consider thefinancing of these projects on the basis of this appraisal only.
Notwithstanding the fact that the mission recognizes that this proposedprocedure may deviate from current and previous practice, the missionbelieves that prevailing specific conditions do justify this recommenda-tion in many respects .
In particular the following aspects were appreciated:
1. All projects do comprise so-called "problem villages" for which itis essential that a speedy implementation can be accomplished, inview of the adverse position of the population.For this reason all projects are classified by the U.P. Governmentas first preference projects, and in principle eligible for accommo-dation in e.g. the Minimum Needs Programme
2. The project locations are scattered within the boundaries of thesame districts as applies for the ongoing (almost completed) Sub-Project I (East).This implies that the (technical) nature and set-up of the newprojects will be identical to adjacent schemes. The Jal Nigam staffclaims to have sufficient experience to complete this kind ofproject in time (see also paragraph 4.4)
3. Design criteria and cost estimate procedures of all new schemes arein compliance with the previously adopted strategy (see also para-graph 4.2)
4. The documents for five projects are being recast regarding popula-tion figures to be applied in the design
5. Two years ago the Comprehensive Review and Appraisal Mission (UP-8)intensively studied all relevant aspects of rural water supply inthis area. It is felt, not only by the mission, that many elementsof this study are transferable to the new projects and therefore nosimilar exercise should be contemplated.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
36
Several recommendations of the UP-8 mission have been implemented,such as:
improvement of geo-hydrological survey (see also paragraph 5.1)siting of public taps has improvednumber of public taps has been increaseda work plan on sanitation, drainage and hygiene education hasbeen formulated and could be implemented simultaneously with thenew projects
6. Problems with saline or brackish water are not to be expected,contrary to experiences in U.P. West
7. The anticipated construction period is estimated to be not less than3 years (see also paragraph 4.4). Any additional activity within theframework of this programme can be identified and implemented withinthis time period, if so desired.
The mission is convinced that a positive decision for an acceleratedapproval procedure in this case will contribute significantly to theimpetus of the water supply programme in this area.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
37
5. MISCELLANEOUS ASPECTS
5.1. Hydrogeological cell
As has been mentioned in the "Report on mision 10 to Uttar Pradesh (UP-10), a hydrogeological cell had been formed within the U.P. Jal Nigamorganization, in conformity with the recommendations of the ComprehensiveReview and Appraisal Mission UP-8.
Two electric loggersjiad been purchased, and a hydrogeologist (on deputa-~tion from the Central~0roundwatt;i Buard) had joined the organizationalready by that time. During the discussions of April 1985 it transpiredthat the appointment of the geophysicist (also on deputation from theCentral Groundwater Board) had been approved, and that he was expected tojoin in the second half of April 1985.
An appraisal report "Purchase of Electric Loggers under Indo-Dutch Re-ap-praisal Mission Scheme" had been prepared, and would be submitted to theNetherlands Government through the Governments of Uttar Pradesh andIndia, in the month of April itself. The cost of the items mentioned inthis report may be summarized as follows:
Table 5.1 - Cost of geohydrological equipment
No.
123456
Item
Electric loggers, 2 unitsTaxes and Excise DutyVans, 2 unitsFabrication of 2 bodiesRegistrationContingencies
Estimated costs
Rs 1,000,00090,000172,00064,000
-32,280
Actual costs
Rs 1,050,000144,000180,00088,00010,00032,280
Total Rs 1,314,280 Rs 1,514,280
5.2. Additional activities
5.2.1. Additional provisions under Sub-Project I
Apart from the purchase of spare pump sets, etc. it had earlier beendecided to provide mobile laboratories for the three districts covered bythe sub-project. At the time of the mission's visit one mobile van hadbeen purchased and the laboratory equipment ordered. The remaining twovans would be purchased as soon as the laboratory equipment would havearrived.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
38
5.2.2. Computer equipment
The mission visited the computer equipment that had recently been in-stalled at the U.P. Jal Nigam's headquarters. It consists of a minicomputer with punch card processing and printing equipment, with a numberof terminals. The U.P. Jal Nigam intends to use the equipment for manage-ment, administrative and technical purposes.
A - 1
ANNEX ARURAL WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS IN
UTTAR PRADESH(NETHERLANDS ASSISTED PROGRAMME)
T E R M S O F R E F R E N C E F O R R E V I E W - A N DA P P R A I S A L M I S S I O N UP-12
1. OBJECTIVES OF THE MISSION
The mission will evaluate all relevant progress and development inthe Netherlands Assisted Water Supply Schemes under execution inthree districts in Uttar Pradesh East (UP East I piped supplies).
Analysis of the situation with respect to the actual status of theproposed hand pump programme (UP East/West III) will be carried out(side letter pending).
To conduct an appraissal of new projects as far as their technicalviability is concerned, in two districts of Eastern Uttar Pradesh.
2. TASKS OF THE MISSION
The mission will be of an exploratory and informative nature underthe following tasks:
a. Discuss the former mission results, with reference to thereport UP-10, October 1984.Specifically of interest will be:- progress made with the implementation of the so-calledvandal-proof standposts
- the siting of the standposts- the achievements regarding the planned number of house con-nections and experience so far with the financial resultsthereof
- the actual situation concerning the finalisation of theproject with regard to assumptions made during the mission'slast visit.
b. To investigate the position of the additional activities asindicated in report UP-8, viz. the procurement of equipmentfor, and staffing of a geohydrological section.
c. Review the disbursement claim(s) since the preceding mission.
d. To compare and analyse the financial predictions for the on-going projects UP East I during the last mission against theactual achievements.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
A - 2
e. An examination into the status of the proposed hand pumpprojects UP III, in view of the progress made with the imple-mentation of pumps by the Jal Nigam organisation in the dis-tricts concerned.The mission will provide its view and advise on any significantchanges which are likely to be encountered as a result of thedelay incurred.
i. A detailed write-up to be given concerning the quality controlmeasures presently imposed by the Jal Nigam on procurement andinstallation of hand pumps, taking into account the recentlyissued Government Specifications Standard.If desirable in the opinion of the mission, recommendationshave to be drafted in which way and by which means an improvedquality control system can be developed.Field visits willbe necessary.
g. The undertaking of a pre-appraisal for the following projects,recently proposed via the Ministry of Works and Housing to theNetherlands Government.
Name of district______nr. of schemes nr. of villages
Varanasi 9 179Allahabad 2 23
The aim of this appraisal is mainly to provide a first impres-sion and to examine the essentials of the technical feasibili-ty, which results can serve as a proper guideline for a moreextensive appraisal to be conducted hereafter.This task for the mission will be carried out on the basis offield visits, discussions with staff members and study ofproject reports, to be made available by the Jal Nigam Organi-sation.Exerpts of the above project reports are available with theWater Supply Coordinator, New Delhi.
The pre-appraisal will at least comprise:
- village selection procedure- design criteria- population growth figures (with reference to correspondenceon this subject)
- technical design features (especially the water sourceproposed)
- geohydrological aspects (incl. water quality)- cost estimates- timing/phasing of the project(s)
h. To table any other subject in the context of the UP projectsdeemed useful in the opinion of the mission.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
A - 3
COMPOSITION OF THE MISSION
Mr. R. Trietsch Mission leader.Senior Water Supply Engineer,DHV Consulting Engineers,The Netherlands
Mr. A.K. Sen Gupta Asstt. Adviser CPHEEO,Ministry of Works and Housing,New Delhi
The Water Supply Coordinator at the Royal Netherlands Embassy in NewDelhi will accompany the mission part time.
4. DURATION OF THE MISSION
The mission is estimated to last for 10 days, from 15 April up tilland including 24 April, 1985, and is programmed as follows:
15.4 - arrival mission leader in India16.4 - preparatory discussions in Delhi and transfer to Lucknow17.4 - 22.4 - discussions with Government of U.P., Jal Nigam and
possible other institutions; field visits23.4 - report drafting and final round of discussions Lucknow24.4 - return to New Delhi
5. REPORTING
The mission will draft preliminary conclusions and recommendationsand will have these discussed with the UP Government and Jal NigamOrganisation, as well as with any other local authority concerned,before leaving Uttar Pradesh.
The results of the mission will then be subjected to discussions inNew Delhi.
After approval of the draft report, final reporting to the Develop-ment Cooperation Department Asia and Multilateral Financial Develop-ment Matters of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the Netherlandsis expected not later than eight weeks after leaving India.The approved report will be submitted to the Government of India.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
B - 1
ANNEX B
ITINERARY OF MISSION
Sunday, April 14, 1985
Departure of Mission leader, Mr. R. Trietsch, from the Netherlands.
Monday, April 15. 1985
Discussiona at Royal Netherlands Embassy with Water Supply Coordinator,Mr. J.A. Speets.Discussions at UNICEP (Mr. Bo Elding) and at Ministry of Works and Hous-ing (Messrs. V. Venugopalan, A.K. SenGupta and R. Sethuraman).
Tuesday, April 16, 1985
Departure of Mission, consisting of Messrs. R. Trietsch, J.A. Speets andA.K. SenGupta, by plane from New Delhi to Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh).Discussions with Managing Director and senior staff of Uttar Pradesh JalNigam in Lucknow.
Wednesday, April 17, 1985
Continuation of discussions with M.D. and senior staff of U.P Jal Nigam.
Thursday, April 18, 1985
Continuation of discussions with M.D. and senior staff of U.P Jal Nigam.Transfer by car from Lucknow to Rae Bareli.Visit to ARP scheme Ichauli and DCP scheme Udari.Discussion of progress of DCP schemes in Rae Bareli District with U.P.Jal Nigam field staff.
Friday, April 19, 1985
Visit to DCP schemes Bannamau, Ralpur, Govindpur, Ferozpur and Bhojpur.Transfer by car from Rae Bareli to Allahabad. On the way visit to DCPscheme Nidura in Allahabad District.Discussion of progress of DCP schemes in Allahabad District with U.P JalNigam field staff in Allahabad.
Saturday, April 20, 1985
Transfer by car from Allahabad to Varanasi. On the way visit to DCPschemes Pratappur, Mirzamurad and Kandwa in Varanasi District, as well asvillages Dhanapur (Allahabad District) and Pilkhuna (Rowi group ofvillages; Varanasi District).Discussion of design reports for new schemes under Sub-Project IV, withAllahabad and Varanasi field staff and Lucknow design staff, in Varanasi.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
B - 2
Sunday, April 21, 1985
Visit to DCP scheme Rohania, and to Sarnath.Discussion of progress of DCP schemes in Varanasi with field staff.
Monday, April 22, 1985
Drafting of Mission's "Conclusions and Recommendations".Meeting with Commissioner, Varanasi District.Return to Lucknow by air.
Tuesday, April 23, 1985
Discussion of Mission's "Conclusions and Recommendations" with ManagingDirector and senior staff of U.P. Jal Nigam.Lunch with Chairman, Managing Director and senior staff of U.P. JalNigara.Return of Mission to New Delhi by plane.
Wednesday. April 24, 1985
Discussions at Royal Netherlands Embassy.Preparations for mission to Gujarat.
Thursday, April 25, 1985
Discussions at UNFPA (Mr. Lap Le), IBRD (Mr. John R. Hansen) and atMinistry of Works and Housing (Mission members, with Messrs. Venugopalan,Shankaran and Sethuraman).
April 26 - May 4, 1985
Mission to Gujarat.
Sunday, May 5, 1985
Departure of Mission leader from New Delhi.
111111iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
ANNEX C
LIST OF AUTHORITIES VISITED /THE SCHEMES
NEW DELHI
Ministry of Works and Housing
Mr. V. VenugopalanMr. T.G. ShankaranMr. A.K. SenGupta
UNICEF
Mr. Bo Elding
UNFPA (United Nations Fund for
Mr. Lap Le
World Bank
Mr. John R. Hansen
UTTAR PRADESH
Lucknow
Mr. Kamal Pandey
Varanasi District
Mr. D.S. Bagga
Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam
Lucknow
Mr. Indra Mohan SahaiMr. S.K. SharmaMr. V.S. ChauhanMr. Rajendra DayalMr. R.P. KhareMr. R.M. NigamMr. D.P. Singhal
C - 1
SENIOR STAFF INVOLVED IN IMPLEMENTATION OF
- Adviser (PHEE) , CPHEEO- Deputy Adviser (PHEEO) , CPHEEO- Assistant Adviser (PHE) , CPHEEO
- Regional Water and Sanitation Officer
Population Activities)
- Program Officer
- Senior Economist,New Delhi Resident Mission
- Secretary to Government, Housing &Urban Development, Lucknow
- Commissioner, Varanasi Division
- Chairman- Managing Director- Chief Engineer (I)- Chief Engineer (II)- Zonal Chief Engineer (West)- Zonal Chief Engineer (East)- Addtl.C.E. (PPRD)
IIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Mr. K.N. KhandelwalMr. V. SinghMr. A. TripathiMr. V.K. GuptaMrs. Hira SharmaMr. D.D. SaxenaMr. A.C. NagarMr. R.N. GuptaMr. A.K. GuptaMr. A.C. Saxena
Rae Bareli
Mr. S.H. ZaheerMr. N.C. SaxenaMr. R.P. PandeMr. Akbar HusainMr. A.L. Taneja
Allahabad
Mr. S.R. DikshitMr. Vijay KumarMr. S.C. JainMr. G.K. Pandey
Varanasi
Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.
R.K.S.R.B.P.N.N.B.K.A.K.R.K.V.P.
SharmaSharmaGoelAgrawalSrivastavaGhosalAgrawalGupta
C - 2
Finance DirectorChief Accounts OfficerSecretary (Administration)Secretary (Management)Manager MonitoringDeputy Manager AppraisalDeputy Manager AppraisalManager TrainingManager Appraisal (on leave)Manager Appraisal
S.E.E.E.E.E.E.E.E.E.
XX circle, FaizabadI Constr.Div., Rae BareliII Constr.Div., Rae BareliE&M Div., Rae BareliII Constr.Div., Sultanpur
(hand pump programme)
S.E., II Circle, AllahabadS.E., Temp. Project Circle, AllahabadS.E., Mech. Circle, AllahabadE.E., Constr. Division, Allahabad
S.E., VII Circle, VaranasiS.E., XVI Circle (E&M), VaranasiS.E., Project Circle, VaranasiE.E., VI Constr. Div., VaranasiE.E., IV Temp. Constr. Div., VaranasiE.E., V Temp. Constr. Div., VaranasiE.E. (E&M), II Constr. Div., VaranasiE.E., III Temp. Constr. Div., Varanasi
II1IIIIII1IIIIIIIIIII
D - 1
ANNEX D
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INDO-DUTCH REVIEW MISSION (UP-12)OF APRIL 1985 TO UTTAR PRADESH (Sub-Projects East I, III, IV)
A. SUB-PROJECT EAST I
1. Commissioning of the schemes
The Mission appreciates that, with the exception of the "vandal-proof"public standposts and some exempted feeders, all DCP schemes in Allahabadand Varanasi Districts have been completed.
The Mission was especially pleased with the fact that all OHT in VaranasiDistrict that were still under construction by the time of its lastvisit, had been commissioned now.In Rae Bareli District, apart from the Udari scheme (for which commis-sioning was planned by September 1985), progress on water sources hasbeen lacking in 2 schemes and on OHT in 4 schemes, whereas a relativelylarge number of exempted feeders had not yet been commissioned. TheMission was informed that for 5 schemes commissioning of these exemptedfeeders is expected within the month of April 1985 itself.
The Mission strongly recommends the UP Jal Nigam to ensure that:a. all OHT and water sources for the DCP schemes are commissioned
before September 1985;b. the Udari scheme is fully commissioned by December 1985;c. all exempted feeders are commissioned and in good working order by
September 1985 (apart from Pratappur, where a SEB sub-station isstill to be constructed). The UP Jal Nigam is requested to do itsutmost to ascertain the required cooperation from the SEB and Rail-ways authorities, and to promote setting up working committees atthe District level, in which all relevant parties are represented,to iron out any practical difficulties in this respect.
The Mission requests that monthly summary progress reports be prepared onthe implementation of the DCP schems, and forwarded directly to theGovernment of India (Ministry of Works & Housing) and of The Netherlands(Royal Netherlands Embassy).
The Mission feels that where progress of the DCP schemes has been delayedtoo often already, whereas the UP Jal Nigam has demonstrated to have theability of implementing projects much faster, no further extension of thedeadline for commissioning the DCP schemes should be allowed.The Dutch members of the Mission therefore recommend to the NetherlandsGovernment that no funds for reimbursing expenditures of Sub-Project EastI be released after January 1, 1986 unless all DCP schemes have beencompleted in all respects by the time limits mentioned under A.I.a andA.1.b above.
1IIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiii
D - 2
2. Expenditures
The Mission noted that again there have been major discrepancies betweenplanned and actual expenditures. For the quarters ending September 1984and December 1984 these discrepancies were approx. 50%.At the risk of repeating itself, the Mission therefore once more requeststhe UP Jal Nigam to adapt its financial planning and accounting proce-dures in such a way that reliable prognoses are obtained.
3. Public standposts
The Mission found that the directive from the Management of the UP JalNigam on freezing the numbers of public standposts has not yet beenofficially lifted, and that only in two schemes in Rae Bareli Districtthe target number of public standposts has been achieved. As a result ofthis, the present number of public standposts is generally far fromadequate.The Mission wishes to reiterate that according to commitments given bythe UP Jal Nigam all public standposts (with the exception of those inthe Udari scheme) should have been completed by March 1985.
It is stressed that the required number of public standposts refers tothe number of taps rather than standposts. In case the population densitywarrants such, multiple-tap standposts may be constructed, thereby pro-portionally reducing the total number of standposts required.
The Mission noted that so far existing public standposts have not beenreplaced by "vandal-proof" ones, and that even a part of the new stand-posts, erected after the Mission's previous visit, was still of the oldtype.The Mission was pleased, however, to have seen at least one "vandal-proof" standpost with a Jayson-type self-closing tap (as agreed uponearlier) during its field visits.
The Mission agrees with UP Jal Nigam's proposal that existing standpostswill be converted into "vandal-proof" ones only when they need majorrepairs. In addition, all taps of existing standposts will immediately bereplaced by Jayson-type self-closing taps.Emphasis will be on constructing the remaining public standposts, whichwill all be of the "vandal-proof" type.
4. Exempted feeders
The Mission found that, apart from the Udari scheme, in 9 cases exemptedfeeders were either not yet commissioned or inoperable. In addition itwas found that power supply through exempted feeders is often renderedineffective because of too high or too low voltages. The Mission alsoreceived indications that in other cases SEE staff is allowing illegalconnections to such exempted feeders, thereby jeopardizing the verycharacter of such feeders, and an uninterrupted supply of power to thewaterworks concerned.
IIItIIIIII1IIIIIIIIII
D - 3
The UP Jal Nigam is requested to use its good offices with the SEE andother relevant authorities, to accomplish a speedy implementation of theexempted feeders, as well as an uninterrupted supply of power, at theright voltage, through these feeders (see also A. I.e.).
B. SUB-PROJECT III (Hand pump schemes)
The Mission has assessed the situation with regard to the status of theongoing hand pump programme, and found that no pumps under the proposedSub-Project III have been erected either in UP East or UP West, pendingthe approval of the project by the Indian and Netherlands Governments.
C. SUB-PROJECT IV (Replacing old Sub-Project II)
1. The Mission received a summary report on 9 out of 11 schemes asproposed by the UP Jal Nigam for replacing the original Sub-ProjectII schemes in UP East and UP West. In addition the Mission scruti-nized the relevant 8 project reports and discussed their contentswith the Jal Nigam staff.
2. The Mission agrees in principle with the designs of the schemes,especially since their lay-out is based on the same design criteriaas adopted for the ongoing schemes (Sub-Project I).The Mission requests that the following changes be made, however:
a. design period to remain 30 years, without exceptionb. population growth to be based on the arithmetic average of the
linear growth method and the compounded growth method, bothrelated to the scheme-wise population for the years 1971 and1981 (population census).
After comparison of the target populations following from the abovemethod and those used in the project reports, it appeared that thetarget populations used in the project reports could be retained forthe Bairi Bisha, Inargaon and Hathi Barni schemes. The financialstatements should be modified, however, to take into account a startof the projects by mid-1986, and commissioning by the end of theyear 1989.
For the remaining schemes the project set-up will have to be re-vised, and to be based on the following population projections:
Scheme Target population1989 2019
Rohi 22,353 49,848Kasidaha 19,076 45,438Birampur 16,559 48,586Awajapur 13,384 24,002Jansa 15,941 • 31,241
IIIIIIIIIIIIiitiiiiii
D - 4
For the Chhekawa scheme in Allahabad District not enough data wereavailable to allow the Mission to calculate the relevant targetpopulations. The UP Jal Nigam is requested to apply the arithmeticaverage of the linear and compounded growth methods (as indicatedabove) also in this case.
In all cases the projects should be based on an implementationperiod from mid-1986 to the end of 1989.
3. The Mission urges the Governments involved to ascertain a speedyimplementation of the schemes, as the area concerned is a drought-stricken area, where relief from water supply schemes is badlyneeded.
The UP Jal Nigam undertakes to prepare a final appraisal report forthese schemes on as short a notice as possible, and have it scruti-nized by the UP State Government by June 1985, whereas the Ministryof Works & Housing undertakes to have the project cleared within onemonth thereafter.
The Governments of India and of The Netherlands are requested to usetheir good offices to expedite an exchange of side letters on theproject, preferably before the end of the year 1985.
4. The Mission requests the UP Jal Nigam to provide at least 7 (seven)copies of the appraisal report to the Governments of India and ofThe Netherlands to expedite matters.
The Mission wishes to express its gratitude to the UP Jal Nigam and otherofficials involved, for their hospitality and cooperation.
The Indo-Dutch Review Mission,April 1985.
IIiiiiiiii
E - 1
ANNEX E
SCHEME-WISE BREAK-DOWN OF REQUIRED NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS
iiii
Legend:
I SC/ST : number of scheduled caste/scheduled tribe populationrest : remaining populationPS1 : number of public standposts required for SC/ST population
^ PS2 : number of public standposts required for remaining population
I
I
I
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItIIII
E - 2
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS FEROZPUR
Year:
Village:
BondaChabulhaFerozpurFuranpurlUsbabadaluNisigarDudhwariSaidapurJaghnothpurMathurpurHalauliDei pur aRaipurkalanRa*atpurkalanftlipurSaraikhara
SC/ST
182758107177156440325176202221241585502640
218
1981rest
278107531096
25111571218587320734272235
134479693970
PS1
351313311521
16204
PS2
272226732621
18416
SC/ST
201839118196173509360195222461371756092920
241
1986rest
308119034310627812811348650354812301260
1488881103
1074
PS1
7
6131331152116204
PS2
372227832732
IB517
SC/ST
218906128212187550389210242651481896583160
261
1991rest
3321286371115300138414577023838783252811607952111
1160
PS1
361313311521
16204
PS2
37222783273219517
SC/ST
2971235174288254750530287333622022588964300
355
2011rest
4531752505156409188619859575221196443383
21911297152
1581
PS1
36132442152216304
PS2
383229104373220619
Sub-totals: 3897 9736 51 71 4313 10776 52 79 4660 11643 52 80 6352 15869 58 92Grand total: 13633 122 15089 131 16303 132 22220 150
Year: Population:
1971 11962 Brottth rate: 1.016 (per annual1981 139651986 150891991 163032011 22220
IIIIIIIIIIIiIIiiiiiii
E - 3
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS RftLPUR
Year:SC/ST
Village:
BheetaSagarkhedaDeokheraRaiaipurkhurdBhajiapurSaidapurBeruaSahanipurChakgorChablahaswayaiRalpurSidhokharaKanjasSepal ikhedaPanditkapuraaRaigaonKalihegaonPusapurDibiaUdaharBeruaharChakchourahiF'otapurHaibatpur
77.400321899124646016312443
62124637612035714116048617433143234246330
19B1rest
3479528532918154195959918387
19651041244450347144740806285185210291163454
PS1
14113210111
217443137411145
PS2
26123312311
2310453157411246
SC/ST
85440352081002705061791364768327041313239215517653419136157257270363
1986rest
381104793362199595
105465920196
21601144268495381158814886313203231320179499
PS1
141132
10111
217443137411245
PS2
26123313311
2410453t6841t246
SC/ST
91475382241082925461941475173829244714342416719057720739170278292392
1991rest
41211311013912156431139712217103
23341237290535412171879957339220249346194539
PS1
141132
10111
217443137411245
PS2
271233
13311
2410453168411246
SC/ST
1256485230614739874526420170
100539860919457822825978728253
231379398534
2011rest
5621541138533293876
1552970296141
3181168539572856223311981305461299340471264735
PS1
151233
11211
217544137411246
PS2
38137•j
414421
2512463179422247
Sub-totals: 5492 11588 91 110 6038 12740 92 114 6524 13765 92 115 8890 18759 100 131Total: 17080 201 ' 18777 201 20288 201 27649 201
Year; Population:
1971 14887 Browth rate: 1.016 (per annum)1981 173791986 187771991 202882011 27649
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
E - 4
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS 60VINDPUR
Year:
Village:
EovindpurPattikheraHurdipur8ha*anipurChaimikheraDhurikheraRanikheraPasankheraNeebiHaieergaonBadhupurBithauliDulapuraRaipurBahadurpurTejqannJhaipurHathnasaDaribapur
SC/ST
6254381010
10215621013539151422088383340270765114414255
1981rest
4851455500218134269893255676128720025379369195115044891454146
PS1
5620111I25113225I32
PS2
3921124237124448281
SC/ST
7405191200
121185249160463609261104454403320906135490302
1986rest
575172459225815931910583028011525237300940819112717825791723173
PS1
5620111125213225142
PS2
41032125247I265693101
SC/ST
BOO5611290
131200269173501658282113490435346979146530326
1991rest
6211863640279172344
11433268651647256324
1015885121719256261861187
PS1
5620112170
5213225142
PS2
4113212524922656113101
SC/ST
10907641760
1782723662366828973841546685934711335199722445
2011rest
8462538872380234469155844511792245349441
13831206165926248532537255
PS1
6620122136213437153
PS2
51442127251122767144122
Sub-totals: 5521 12653 44 48 6541 14991 46 83 7067 16197 48 89 9632 22075 58 109Total: 18174 112 21532 129 23265 137 31707 167
Year: Population:
1971 17070 Growth rate: 1.016 (per annual1981 199281986 215321991 232652011 31707
E— 5
DETERhlNATlON OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BHOJPUR
Year:SC/ST
Village:
KathakaMagalpurBisayahpurPathakpurPathakkheraHandapurBosaikheraHakhopurPurshottaipurBhupatpurBhojpurDalipurDandiTasbaHohanpurKodariKashikheraJai SopalqanjTiwari KalanTixari KhurdLadaikheraRajapurKaibatpurkhurdChitakheraJhulpurKhenankheraChahetarPathak BharuDurajanpurGahrauliHaripurDaulatpurSadap'jrChakati
Sub-totals:Total:
459142"13912811949270368022852177830
12612783037773810
1661221771223822598387314122076
563220171
1981rest
2531056392372392305164496166
2998666189410
87843013823517742322642140835733277719222517544594071460
14539
PS1
31111125025I1011102120111121132101
47124
PS2
21311115121431104212121222241182210
77
SC/ST
50015515113913053
294401024929193900
1371389004084
4150
18313319313341627107422342133083
613821982
1986rest
27611469625826025156702105181
3267726206450
95746915025619346124645944538936284720924519125004441590
15845
PS1
3111112502511011102120111121132101
47130
PS2
2132221512163110421212122214.
41192210
83
SC/ST
54016716415114058
318433026
1003208980
14815098044914490
19814420814445029
115456370144089
6632-23752
1991rest
29812475227928127160758113195
3530784223480
103450616227720849826649648042039191522626520655404791720
17120
PS1
311111250251I011102120111121132101
47138
PS2
21422215121641105310L.
12222*>A.
241•\L
103210
91
SC/ST
73722822320519179433591035
13672841330
2022041330591246110
270196284196613401576215041960
122
903932372
2011rest
406169
102638038436982
1034154266
48111069303660
1409690221377284679363676655573533124730836128157376532340
23333
PS1
4111112502821011102130212131133101
57170
PS2
2152221712
21521063122323333522127\i
310
113
Year: Population:
1971 174271^81 203451986 219S21991 237522011 32372
Growth rate: 1.016 (per annul)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
E - 6
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDFASTS THULENDI
Year:
Village:
ThulendiBujarpurRasulpurBahadurpurUiarpurHal purBharaipurPandirakhurdfthsan JagatpurflanikpurJaipurRaipur Hoh,PeethanKaranpurPanasaUdariPander akal anKilagarhiHasva
Sub-totals:Total:
SC/ST
10A1.27548790488488236143
104215437224026961462640023075356
764620091
1981rest
2997695093467001003357293
11282695573092101485101551936189229
12445
PS1
62316881
121222378423
81186
PS2
142427116213237w
1698523
105
SC/ST
1169331547101548548265161
117017341827030269070344925884400
858322566
1986rest
3366785723897861127401329
126730262634723616681140583405100257
13978
PS1
62416881
121322378423
83193
PS2
1624271182132431799523
110
SC/ST
1276362597110598598289175
127718945629433075376749028292436
937124623
1991rest
3673856244248581229438359
138233068337925718201244636442109281
15252
PS1
70t.
416881
131322478423
86200
PS2
1724271282132432899523
114
SC/ST
1809513846156848848410248
181026864641746710671088695400130618
1328434905
2011rest
520712088460112161743620509
196046796853736525801763902627155398
21621
PS1
107V
4161081
142322588424
97232
PS2
232538138316253211119623
135
Year: Population:
1971 17370 Bro»th rate: 1.018 (per annua)1981 206811986 225661991 246232011 34905
E - 7
DETERHlNftTION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS JA6ATPUR
Year:SC/ST
Village:
OnikaiauSanboopuauJagpatti Dai.Jagpatti Kesh.JagiadipurJagatpurZingnaIbrahiipurR. BokulpurR. BheebhanshahJ. BodhiharR. TikariaPoorabgaonHouaharganjShanbaspurShyaibuxpurwaHextaha N.NaNabganjJo*adiSidhorKotiaUiariBhatauliUdnaDalautpurSughapurBichchiya BadiTaughariDhobhahabhurdSati Sri NinasParasu RaapurHarpur Halla
Sub-totals:Totals:
249211B864104321291751850
2359231421792091861451611261007311569344184390174377560
169565
634823688
1981rest
47129311989260236565243745245215014641178474436129263546543640230557420213863982703004571470
307535
17340
PS1
431128213041034421241242633431036
972A2
PS2
431141974433151265863423721053461145
165
SC/ST
27fc2349771115355321942050
26010221571982312061611781391118112776381204432193417620
187625
702826224
1986rest
52132413299288261872248450050016616211304525483143070351548344533863522415344412993325061577
340592
19197
PS1
431128213041034421241242633431036
97267
PS2
47•J
1
1
41974533151265863524721253461145
170
SC/ST
29825210577124384352092210
28111041702142502221731931511208713883411220467208451670
202676
759328335
1991rest
563350142106311282978052354154117917511409567522154576055652248136568724216584763233595471784
367640
20742
PS1
431128213041034421241242633441036
98268
PS2
4311419745331512658635247iL1253461145
170
SC/ST
406344143104170523472853020
3831505231292341303236262205163119187112561300636284615910
276921
1034938618
2011rest
768478194145424385610637127377372452387192077371121061035758711655497936329226064944048974523114500872
28269
PS1
431128223041234431241242734441037
105297
PS2
5411424845331813661075534721453461146
192
Year: Population:
1971 207901981 242711986 262241991 233352011 38618
Broxth rate: 1.016 (per annual
E - 8
DETERfllNATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS ASHRAFPUR
Year:
Village:
ftshrafpur(UrchahaarKol*aBarkhurdarpurKajipur T.BheliaKantaHajipurBanniSaraiMagdaiyapurKasiipurDighaKurhaftrsadpurPurey NinajJaiiaharganjTahirpurChakcalehraTarapur
Sub-totals:Totals:
SC/ST
920.4843716451854223514523630423630529253020227020
158
531916004
1981rest
1280136778936112780870537550468638447044310603601431504330267
10685
PS1
818188814514613130101
82180
PS2
919498924624615231112
98
SC/ST
12206457921768771931219231340331340438770327301030
209
705121216
1986rest
1697180
103112411494107193549766890950962358714054771901995740354
14165
PS1
919188814524614130101
86192
PS2
101
105108925635715231112
106
SC/ST
13597164624276580134721434944934945143178330335030
233
785823643
1991rest
189120111491383166511941042554745101356769465415665322112226444394
15785
PS1
91918881452461413010I
86198
PS2
101
106109935735716331112
112
SC/ST
209610999637411801235535330538693538695665120846517050
360
1211936464
2011rest
291631017732133256818411606854114815638751071100924158203263429866608
24345
PS1
121
10299925635715140102
103243
PS2
152
11914101047947717432113
140
Year: Population:
1971 15330 Growth rate: 1.022 (per annum)1981 190381986 212161991 236432011 36464
E - 9
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS UDARI
Year:
Village:
TanduaBasauniKaitpur MaxaiaJaialpur HariaKahafttadpur N.Bhadaiya H.UdariNigohaChak BhurBagheriKharoliChak BheshanaHa»ai AlaspurChakiactaBajhi BholaiauNasirabadJayasstiayai
Sub-totals:Totals:
SC/ST
65311939341014146720458461573252430
7B50
75137126
692217205
1981rest
1702511677315639120388515741683156270
635260170313289
10283
PS1
1346436
1612133080331
86204
PS2
237746121618124082332
118
00000000
00
0
00
SC/ST
73513444346215952623039531773662740
884084154142
779619377
1986rest
1917576762355720135599717731893557060
715293191353325
11581
PS1
134643617121330B0331
87206
PS2
237746121618134082332
119
00000000
00
0
00
SC/ST
820149493515177586256710621974083050
9850
94172158
868821594
1991rest
21366418503958021510111119762113957870
797326213393363
12906
PS1
1346436181214308033I
89213
PS2
238746131618135092342
124
00000000
00
0
00
SC/ST
1264230761794273904395916383046294700
15200
145265244
1340033306
2011rest
32959891311610
12372329171330473256101214
01229503329606559
19906
PS1
144653823132440100331
103244
PS2
2588581516222360107V
343
141
Year: Population:
1971 140011981 173881986 193771991 215942011 33306
6rowth rate: 1.022 (per annual
E - 10
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BANNAMAU
Year:SC/ST
Village:
UgabadDhanabadRani purAlaipurChandaRasgaonYusufpurBannatauTaudhakpurTrivedipurFlohatudiauDatauliJaiubabaSaistabadHustafabadChanda TikarFakhruddinpurRajauliGovindpur I).Sak.hsapurKan flauBahaiSondassiChichihaSanatpurSoiulRishalpur L.
268-16937722031518026421435019114335B902402B35051775302000
21825275552166850
225
19B1rest
55656437671345072096275935019227711725903201442939196609657307215343B1192404515593241
PS1
324434422125136827101
216•3303
PS2
43362666212632109273212084343
SC/ST
291184410239343196287233381208155389982613085491925762170
23727486032357450
245
19B6rest
607613409775489783104682538120930112746423481568102121366271433423437381296439560645262
PS1
3244344221251368271012263303
PS2
43362676212a3210927321
2194343
SC/ST
3151994432583702113102514112241684211062823325932086232350
25629696522548050
264
1991rest
656663442838529846113089241122632513776933761694110323071577236125340391400475605697283
PS1
324434422125I368271022363403
PS2
44463677212833109274222394343
SC/ST
4292716043525042834233435603062295731443844538092838493200
34940468893461097
0360
2011rest
8939036021142721115315401215560307444187794551223091503314975105249234455051909647825949386
PS1
3244344232251369282022573503
PS2
64473787323126314102752231114653
Sub-totals: 9500 18751 101 128Totals: 28251 229
10330 20389 102 13330719 235
11161 22029 105 14233191 247
15211 30023 114 17745233 291
Year: Population:
1971 243541981 284311986 307191991 331912011 45233
Bronth rate: 1.016 (per annual
111111111111111111111
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERSt*m»tim*t*H*ft*mt
Year:
Village:
HatehnaKhanpur K.6ahri(khas>BarahaHaripur (khas)Purey OreeDhanipurSarai KurilRewari P.BandaiBehtakalanShajpurMaheshkheraPratappurBahraipurSolhaiauBanqarkheraUdwaiauSar.diJagatpur N.ChaipatpurBetauraJhabra H.DayalpurHalpurAlaipurDhanabadMubarakpurSatanpurHaduriPurey BhanwaniKuirauraDostpurNarsinghpur
Sub-totals:Totals:
Year:
19711981198619912011
SC/ST
1207558095805010080160448755400
1201330
30703021075120802dO1004040210120390806200
200
545129B35
1981rest
515" 752340104073145046561263014423735418984105430200504161351285435145494021538210022536015451045105995255270
24384
PS1
2173212235810110I21522111122141601
73222
PS2
41
1654224410192512114110384121237718T
2
149
E - 1 1
OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BEHTAKALAN>m}4t~ifm*mmmt*}ft*i*tmmmtm}*mt*t»***mmi*t{*mt*4
SC/ST
13484
6491069056
11290179502845450
1341490
34783423584134902241124545235134437906940
224
610233399
1986rest
57784
2620116481850452168570516144181468
11021184812245646615114394871628105224142811225240317301170118
1114285302
27297
PS1
2173212236810110121522111122141601
74237
PS2
4I
1874344510232512I1411039512I23771822
163
SC/ST
145917021159760
12197194542913480
1451610
36853625491145972421214848254145472977500
242
659336087
1991rest
62391
2830125888454456274076217444518506119012752024260503163155452617591137260462121272435186912641271204308327
29494
PS1
2183212236810110I2152211I122141601
75248
PS2
41
197534451023361311411039522 '123981922
173
SC/ST
198124956157132821651322647391245660
1982190491154934612419813233016566663461986431321022
0330
898649182
2011rest
849124
3857171412057427671009103923776157689162217370933082686223211871723971550354630165371593254717231731640420445
40196
PS1 PS2
2 61 18 223 82 61 32 42 53 66 1310 281 30 81 11 30 21 12 41 15 132 42 121 72 21 31 12 23 41 115 101 17 110 22 2
82 210292
Population:
2647930912333993608749181
Growth rate: 1.015 (per annun)
E - 12
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS SAIDABAD
Year:SC/ST
Village:
AsepurBinda Chak MukicSaraidisuChak Budh BhartiZirayat R.J. LalpurPatti ParvatSangrai PattiAnjanaBijhauniyanHakic PattiSaidabadSarai HansurDasautinahuadihBhiskiBaderaBajhan BishranDhokn Upahar
Sub-totalssTotals:
3605925240
54830
2672405391931762928304443750
4541228
665123590
1981rest
132014089211401618873805731270321237178415875090658522016363282
16939
PS1
2330110233415543029
51169
PS2
98622724843104451031017
118
SC/ST
4467336490671030
33129766723921836210285504640
5621520
823429206
1986rest
163417431140173199109847070915723972932209196929112272427220254063
20971
PS1
34401102334156430310
57187
PS2
1010622724943124471031021
130
SC/ST
5098377410761170
37833976227324941311746285300
6421737
940833367
1991rest
1867199213031982281255537810179645433525232231061128282731123144642
23960
PS1
344011023441565403
11
61206
PS2
101262283510431346B1031125
145
SC/ST
86814271263
01302000
6435781299465424704200010709040
10942959
1602956852
2011rest
3181339322203373882138916138130617745714299381180721B3141053039437910
40823
PS1
57601103464259650515
84286
PS2
15181122
114715441948101041836
202
Year: Population:
1971 19584 Bro«th rate: 1.027 (per annul)1981 255631986 292061991 333672011 56352
E - 13
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS NIDURA
Year:
Village:
NiduraLal BopalganjDaniyalpurKatalpurPiyari IH B.Akhrajpur U.Akhrajpur K.Patna Kacharflirjabhan K.(Urjabhan U.Patna UpraharShyaipurKasupur J.Chak Jaghubir P.Chak Noti Rai 0.BhikhacpurOhanpurDhanpur Singh.ftrrichakBhadapurIbraliiipurChak R. Urf Ahl.KhanjahanpurRaoanParsanandpurAndhiyariChak Shah Hacid
Sub-totals:Totals:
Year:
19711981198619912011
SC/ST
1013636026757515400042
200182711680
118000
1611301101451233700
365520350
1981rest
43303074679757
1614370000
130560901741002500
3949600
4826049684145491060
0
16695
PS1
171136200011111I010002I11250
49145
PS2
271334103000131111021003341L
3100
96
SC/ST
1184747031267218000049234213213790
138000
1881521291691444320
427223785
1986rest
506135937948851886432000
1526551052031172920
46011200
563706
11314846421239
0
19513
PS1
1711362000111111010002111250
49157
PS2
3115461040001311120210033523100
108
SC/ST
1325827834975220100055262243514890
154000
2111701441901614840
478226623
1991rest
56654022888990
2111484000
1707331182281313270
51512600
631790
12665427181387
0
21841
PS1
171136200012111101000211t250
50172
PS2
3317461340001311120310044634110
122
SC/ST
2080129123548
118131600086
4113755231400
242000
3312672262982537600
750641790
2011rest
88926313139415553314760000
26711501853572055130
80919700
9901240198885011272177
0
34285
PS1 PS2
t19 431 261 63 78 183 50 00 00 01 22 51 11 21 11 30 01 40 10 00 03 52 51 82 42 65 130 0
58 165223
Population:
1696021249237842662241790
Growth rate: 1.022 (per annuc)
E - 14
DETERMINATION OF NUK8ERS OF PUBLIC STftNDPOSTS PRATAPPUR
Year: 19B1 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
Village:
ShurdauliDidonaSarain HariraiPrathakurainfchagwaraJanuwadihKandharpurBibipur U.PaiypurHirzapurSultanpurSaron SultanpurKhanpurThanapurThataWalhipurSoraonHeerpurSeudh SoronKatehriBabupur BelonBarasta KhurdUgapurSossesipurBirapurBarasta KalanBhupurHavasabadVikra«shad B.UdgiNevadbasana
Sub-totals:Totals:
30.93681450
3111050
231296161141865411817558
83111613820
410942021435955612016112811859
616329271
54815801040 '205
13142901321475652546941412
1536646659192
233150553010846019905001292541115643441580909128
23108
2I\0210221113111411I21111311111
42173
396182194343834I
1334735312632442
131
3824541790
3841300
2853661991741066682249372
1026143170255061162491777368714819915814673
761036145
677195112842531623358163206880567411625091897798814237287862465413397421222b!715931413777945457161122158
28534
22102I022I1t41115I1131111311111
45201
4108282
' \10435310441
1644756412943462
156
4365192050
4391480
32641822719912176325510682
1172164195285781332852028378416922718116683
869541295
77322291467289
185440918623639207701328581216791193027132897127481529848139770518235815739076228181282181
32600
2310210221114211511141211511111
51223
41282931
125464
11452
1744956412943462
172
7438853490
7482520
5557113873392071300435180139
199727933248985226486344142
1336288387308284142
1481370354
131737982500493
3158697317402615671312226299036921553158446156031214127426051445238012023106112680154510601394218530B
55541
342032033221621I922151221622221
75339
71813214321876105177722666128
1162315757102
264
Year: Population:
1971 24238 Growth rate: 1.027 (per annul)1981 316371966 361451991 M2952011 70354
111111111111111111111
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS»**i»*mmm*tmtm
Year:SC/ST
Village:
ChaukhataAchchola U.KothariSarai KalanSarai KhurdIialia KalanChaukata GauraKextahiLehandiSikraAkodaSonbarsaBhoghaChorbanaAuntaMonaiSonaiKhainiaZeraPatti Nath RaiArazi AkodaNarnar UparharDighia Part.
Sub-totals:Totals:
Year:
19711981198619912011
2352208B4814344366
2851103471081948996864139224473668202
85
559520267
1981rest
1362' 814
14714694
1122594194
1350366787369433554246695639944447798465334215
14672
PS1
51222411213221843134121
56162
PS2
851228318353351778238121
106
E - 15
OF PUBLIC STANDPOETS URWAMmfi4}ttm»O**f*tH*i»m*4mim*t'm*t*it4ttmt**tmtt}*tftmi
SC/ST
3032831136218457188
367142447139250115
124782650531609861263
110
720926115
1986rest
17551049189188121
1446765250
1740472
1014475558714
31781232514572615126884430277
18906
PS1
52222511214221863146121
64196
PS2
127122941
103734522118349122
132
SC/ST
35132813172
21366199
425164518161289133
144495658536706996303
127
834530230
1991rest
203212142192181401674886289
2014546117455064682636781426595662711146897498321
21885
PS1
5222251I214221863146121
64201
PS2
137J22942
11373452211B3410132
137
SC/ST
6295892361293831186
1616
76329592928952023825931717105064
12671789545
228
1498554280
2011rest
3648218039439125230051591520
3616980210898811601484660525601069118912782635174895576
39295
PS1 PS2
5 183 122 22 22 27 161 81 34 202 56 112 54 71 10
14 389 165 81 56 69 151 12 41 3
90 217307
Population:
16B36225602611530230542BO
Growth rate: 1.030 (per annus)
111111111111111111111
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS»ttmttmm*tmtmt
Year:
Village:
ft*-*™
Chhitt^urShir SohardhanDap'11
NarcttampurRaw aTiknSarai DagiTarapcr
Kurhuax-HhviT
BiliO'irChsitiiii
FhaxiiDurKb ana*BetwrKa'saraBachhawnftud'ieRaapurAsra
Nuwaonfithari
Sub-totals:To ta l s :
Year:
19711981198619912011
SC/ST
450.500750650
1000750500
1200600350550350100150200300
0200350900
1000250340800600500
1000
1434040750
1981rest
175017603230
400760770
22501500880530
1110570430200920620170660600800
2350560
010801380
720410
26410
PS1
223345263232212204247544456
89207
PS2
78
1324496435321431334
10305632
118
E - 16
OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS TIKR1imtmmi m*m*»imtt*»mm**tm*mttmmm»m**»*»*tm»fi
SC/ST
550611917794
1222917611
1467733428672428122183244367
0244428
11001222306416978733611
1222
1752849808
1986rest
213921513948
489929941
275018331076
6481357697526244
1125758208807733978
2872684
013201667
880501
32281
PS1
346485463332212204267546456
107248
PS2
99
16244
118536331641434
12306743
141
SC/ST
618686
1030892
13731030686
1647824480755480137206275412
0275480
12361373343467
1098824686
1373
1968655942
1991rest
240224164434
54910431057308920591208
7281524783590275
1263851233906824
10983226
7690
14831894
988563
36256
PS1
4466854
126353212204387546457
126285
PS2
101018
355
13953743I641445
13406843
15?
SC/ST
98310921638142021851638109226211311765
1202765218328437655
0437765
19662185
546743
1748131110922185
3132786225
2011rest
382338457056
87416601682491532771922115824251245939437
20101354371
14421311174851341223
0235930151573896
57694
PS1 PS2
5 166 169 297 4
12 710 76 20
12 146 84 56 104 52 42 22 94 60 24 64 6
10 713 215 54 0
10 108 137 7
12 4
174 243417
Population:
3515544347498085594289022
6ro*th rate: 1.023 (per annu»)
E - 17
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS SEHAPUR1
Year:
Village:
BanauliDubeypurBhoshilaOderhaIsarwar(lajhiyarRagunathBajardihaTarapurHarbhanpurVirhar8hag»atipurBopalpurKapsettuBiratpurBaradihJagitpurBazar KalikaUperwarKhillopurBhitkuriDanoopurF'asulahaHarauyanHitapurHaharajpurBaharparBisahupurPachwarP.adhopurLhackasilah
SC/ST
5001003505003001503501000
400100200503500
4002000
25010010000
2000
55038635030000
1981rest
440' 2006701105703136262342857532003072373541013253569936921888233908723713024820
1460990830
PS1
2122212102111203201110010323200
PS2
2131323124121327353142422207410
SC/ST
5781164045783471734041160
462116231584040
4622310
28911611600
2310
63544640434700
1986rest
SOB231774127659362723270329870231355278494741531411114780021795145110074293495570
1687114496o
PS1
3123212102111203202110010333200
PS2
314132321f.
4121428364142522308510
SC/ST
6491304546493891954541300
519130260654540
5192600
32413013000
2600
71450145438900
1991rest
5712608691437404068123043709772603983095453217194621289898244106850611324813926250
189512851080
PSl
3123212103121203202I10020333200
PS2
324132422422143936415350«.
2309610
SC/ST
103320772310336203107232070
8262074131037230
8264130
51620720700
4130
113679772362000
2011rest
9094131384227
11776461293483589155541363447
1518847273673520511429388169980518017666249950
301520441710
PSl
5135323104121305203110020544300
PS2
4261536237231741241062749434014910
Sub-totals: 6286 15203 39 78Totals: 21489 117
7263 17565 43 8924827 132
8157 19728 46 9827885 144
12981 31394 64 14544375 209
Year: Population:
1971 175231981 221051986 248271991 279852011 44375
SroKth rate: 1.024 (per annuc)
IIIII
E - 18
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS HARHUA
Year: 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
Village:^^m
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ftushanpurPandeypurChakkaKarotaDuniapurNaipuraSur*aBarxaBokulpurAnauraBajalpattiDhanasariLuchhaipurBhatauliSahtalpurSarai S*a«iBosainpurBhagatupurHansapurDasipurAsiqpurNahadeopurHarishankarpattiSarai KaziNarainpur6or«aKailhatKoirajpur KhasHarhuaRai SinghpurSinghapurVishnupurDeonathpurChandipattiHohanpurWarBall purBesahipurf aapurPachhispurSatibuddinpurChanraonScr.cS^purJaitapattiRellhaBa:;purM-r-apurIdilpyrPratap PattiBahetipurBachhia
3362510939500182292510992
•672250210
3662618904
47164761300
62914812041112
12116615515500
2536552539?582751160
174148310
10940
84157718520131642926544119852219792925524475202786720
12612311312245110
11529512423660
3103093233891991713091522560
6560
294677208'89339350212
3 •1120011201I110I021101111104I11110i.
111001I1321L
I02110
504j11222213142113230115130641202n
27
1121ni
03(i2321221
40230
13147300222743010
1192802690250
438312260556196911560
7531797244131414519913618600
30378629478693291390
208177370
13100
1007m222241378514317528237625236111330529566233338050
151147
13552686120
138011392904380
3713703874662382053701823070
7860
352811249107406419254
311200122011120102110111110411111211100217
14.
1
2102110
605411232313152113240116230752202227
1
1
212o40i.
42122L.
4523414753100
243083380
1333903030280
4923525405632211021750
84619109274151616322320820800
34087706537783701560
234199420
14720
1131776249270425577356593266702265125034332636993749040
16916515213016870
155012793264920
4174164345232682304162043440
8820
395911280120456471285
3I1300122011120102120111110411211211100213312102110
605412232323252113240117230762202227
21212040i.
4212nL
2
7195423384600394905370
2124
1434820
' 450
7835640509
1013511632780
134630173437242625935533233200
542139
11248541245892430
372317660
23420
180012353964306769185679444241117422198954651101
11135951438
027026324214791094
0246620365187830
6646616918334263646613255480
14040
6291449445191726749454
3114001230111201041201121206112112222007O
15413103210
100B62234342528311536022102501193403334223230603621332
E - 19
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STAHDPOSTS HARHUA
Year:
Village:
1981SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
1986SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
1991SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
AiaxarRaisipattiNatandipurJaysipattiBasudeopurSabhaipurKharagpurShaiahapurBhagwanpurKaunapurSikanderpurftshapurHariharpurSirsanafladhopurJaialpattiHadhaipur U.R.KhariBhobhiHariraapurBira»pattiChuppepurJaipurKot KhasUndiIndoarKoi ranAhiranPurabnurSanyaTulsipatti
Sub-totals:Totals:
IB16400
3130
348262324117810
181325248570
1302380
65540015910499273905864188450
1286938494
36047900
1491057603004821611890
10659444900
2292420
103668320020010030800
23915638
25625
110020222110121I0I•)£
0321112441Ti,
0
96236
2200214221101320011053111200111
140
2219600
3750
417314368140970
217389297680
1562850
78447919012511932710841035225540
1541246102
43157400
1781269103595771932260
12771153800
2742900
124181824024012036900
28618746
30690
1100202221101221012042111255120
102264
2300214231101330022054111200211
162
2422100
4210
4683524361571090
243437334770
1753200
88153821414013336712171162253610
1731151780
48464400
200141
10224046482172540
14379960400
3083260
139491926926913541400
32121051
34469
1100202221101221012043111255220
1082E2
2300215231201430022064221200211
174
3935100
6700
7455616942501730
3876965311220
2785090
140285634022321258419371849402960
2754682397
7711025
00
319225162764210323454050
227127196100
4905180
2218146242842821465900
512334Bl
54851
1200403332102331023064211388nL
20
149402
4500217352201640023096221300321
253
Year: Population:
1971 32539 6ro*th rate:1981 410471986 461021991 517792011 82397
1.023 (per annual
E - 20
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BIRADNKOT
Year: 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 ' 5C/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
Village:
Sarxan 531 1327 5 9 638 1593 5 10 716 1789 5 10 1139 28*7 7 15Hahiipur 501 994 3 7 601 1193 4 8 676 1340 4 8 1075 2133 5 12Chanbankat 0 96 0 1 . 0 115 0 1 0 129 0 1 0 204 0 1Akorha 765 616 4 4 918 740 5 4 1032 831 6 5 1642 1322 8 7Rasulah 590 878 3 4 708 1054 4 5 796 1184 4 5 1266 1884 7 8Dandupur 1652 992 8 6 1983 1191 9 8 2228 1338 10 8 3545 2129 17 13Telxar 236 299 1 2 283 359 2 2 318 403 2 2 506 642 3 3Koilar 236 406 2 3 283 487 2 3 318 547 2 4 506 871 3 5Saripur 0 243 0 1 0 292 0 2 0 328 0 2 0 521 0 3Nazgaxan 118 135 1 1 142 162 1 1 159 182 1 1 253 290 2 2Hazgawan Kalan 295 608 2 3 354 730 2 4 398 820 2 4 633 1305 3 6Chakia 0 266 0 2 0 319 0 2 0 359 0 2 0 571 0 3Siahra 47 147 2 1 56 176 2 1 63 198 2 1 101 315 2 2Sainpur 242 471 3 3 291 565 3 3 326 635 3 3 519 1011 3 5Tilari 41 119 1 2 49 143 1 2 55 160 1 2 88 255 1 2Hadhu Makia K. 509 830 3 4 611 996 3 5 686 1119 3 6 1092 1781 5 8Kuru 596 765 5 6 716 918 5 6 804 1032 6 6 1279 1642 7 9Kodai 326 649 2 4 391 779 2 4 440 875 2 4 700 1393 4 7Barnapur 0 90 0 1 0 108 0 1 0 121 0 1 0 193 0 1Hasanpur 415 992 3 5 498 1191 3 5 560 1338 3 7 891 2129 5 10ChangNar 354 952 4 6 425 1143 4 7 477 1284 4 7 760 2043 5 11Pater 118 420 1 4 142 504 1 4 159 566 1 4 253 901 2 6Sajapur 34 177 1 4 41 213 1 4 46 239 1 4 73 380 1 4Ish*arpur 89 265 1 2 107 318 1 2 120 357 1 2 191 569 1 3Biraonkot 0 798 0 4 0 958 0 5 0 1076 0 5 0 1712 0 8Sarwanipur 0 188 0 1 0 226 0 1 0 254 0 2 0 403 0 2Balraapur 590 930 3 5 708 1117 5 6 796 1254 5 6 1266 1996 8 9Phulwaria 0 334 0 3 0 401 0 3 0 450 0 3 0 717 0 3Chaturpur 0 450 0 3 0 540 0 3 0 607 0 3 0 966 0 4Bhita 0 578 0 3 0 694 0 4 0 779 0 4 0 1240 0 6Vishnathpur 332 649 2 4 399 779 2 4 448 875 2 4 712 1393 4 6Neaada 0 350 0 2 0 420 0 2 0 472 0 2 0 751 0 4Sonahi 0 127 0 1 0 152 0 1 0 171 0 1 0 273 0 2Khararia(biraon) 0 347 0 2 0 441 0 2 0 495 0 2 0 783 0 4Khararia 472 1418 3 7 567 1702 4 7 636 1912 4 9 1013 3043 6 14Balua 661 1114 5 6 794 1337 6 9 891 1502 6 9 1418 2390 10 15Kan:ar 826 1843 4 9 992 2213 5 10 1114 2485 5 12 1772 3955 9 18Baulia 184 517 2 3 221 621 2 3 248 697 2 4 395 1109 3 5HarhhN 4 5 1 1 8 1 1 5 4 1 4 2 1 1 6 1 1 5 9 1 1 9 7 2 5 3 1 2Chilbila 648 1062 4 5 778 1275 4 6 874 1432 4 6 1390 2279 7 11U'ibhapur 386 300 2 2 463 360 3 2 521 405 3 2 828 644 4 3Dir.ipur 100 343 I 2 120 412 1 3 135 463 1 3 215 734 1 4fundi 1076 2361 7 12 1292 2835 9 14 1451 3164 10 15 2309 5066 13 24rususra 472 471 2 2 567 565 4 3 636 635 4 3 1013 1011 6 5Itha 0 590 0 3 0 708 0 3 0 796 0 4 0 1266 0 6f-atehpur 413 546 2 3 496 656 3 4 557 736 3 4 886 1172 5 6
Sub-totals: 13900 28191 93 168 16668 33846 109 190 18743 38014 113 203 29827 60492 168 307Totals: 42091 261 50534 299 56758 316 90319 475
E - 21
DETERHINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS BIRAONKOT
Year; 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
Year: Population:
1971 35667 Bro»th rate: 1.023 (per annui)1981 449931986 505341991 567582011 90319
E - 22
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS KIR2ft«URftD
Year:
Village:
1981SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
1986SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
1991SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
EajepurShiriharaNarayanpurShaibhoopurHatukaKakrahnanPratappurChaklolaRaidihBhikhaipurKathurwaArjunpurAdtanpurPuranderpurNonkharaKatwarupurSarangpurKheiapurBorainSuierpurKardhanaDoianpurRaiathaunaLalpurLeruaiKharagraipurDandrahiaSheoraapurthakarpanpurMughalbirLallapurBurudaspurBadipurBharharaflaiihukarshahpurLakshapurNayapurBhihpurfhriaiurad (6.)KhillispurhJiniKhalipur
Sub-totals:Totals:
2-751002032383000
67656316010502257407001500470
45650571
21582011753316030225100373000
15014090329800
330270568911
1300038671
50171432248486535123971846995010643463718616210142542849378
283327816240444653244223040232826943647179157748747447
3653908
11491588
25671
2131204415233101033191322111200012122021i.
44
83264
331323
15525227311232I
132322432ni.
44342nL
133206T/
17
181
3301202432853600
81067519212592708878391800560
54760585
25872412103977236270120447000
1801661083949fc0
3963247051092
1558646364
601656382975836411485861562113912752076422319412151051359194
339733321848453563853027648239332352356595188897896536
43801089137B1904
7.0778
21322044162441010431
111322121200012222020i.
45
92282
341333155352373113331
1423234322443422747
206717
190
3701352733204040
91075821514143039969432020630
6146BO96
29062712364468140
303135502000
2021891214431080
4443647921227
1750552073
6759614333465472016689676321279143584858250218136572576664105
381537424554460171659531054144236258763410621110071006602
4919122315472138
34568
21322054163441010431
1223221217*/
0001222202245
97295
341333
1553623731.1333I
1623334323444422753
206817
198
5892144355106430
144912063432250482158615003210
1010
9771082152
462443137570912964482214799000
3213001937051710
70757912601952
2785682863
107415306953110411146265515391005203622793013653993472169119171056167607059639086695611409474938617035769341009169336160316019587828194624623403
55007
31333066293762010551
19233212140002223203368
134393
5717*j
55167592473214451
2533445424445522874328
1117
259
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
E - 23
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS HIRZAKURAD
Year: 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
Year: Population:
1971 32724 Broxth rate: 1.023 (per annua)1981 412801986 463631991 520732011 82B62
E - 24
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS ROMANIA
Year:
Village:
ParsanandpurUadirajpurKholaspurHaniyaripurTundiyaLakahpurBhulanpurPandeapurNathupurUnchagaonDaudpurRairaipurBhasahapurLachhitanpurDayapurTulachakShahababadHanharpurBhataipurBishunpurPilkhiniNerurEaliraipurFatehgungBhatthiBasantpattiEopalpurKarotaDarekhuRohaniaBovindpurHarpalpurKesaripurKarkatpurWaheshpurChandapurChandpurKandulikhurdSheodaspurPratappattiKansaraiHifinsroralandiaChakdarsant-'araichaBikapurrirabanChakdinEh it an
SC/ST
553•0
144000005721237000
139930
150821111976700
4101200
4072900253255981834471702351507480
70o00
2353401190
530
1981rest
1369509429956537597890258651831416465732308
145584627220460912238720214464
117512063041337187461836116682002564
1295311
1454897
18310
8290
1700
205150203169481
PS1
3010000011100011021111002102301341311130100012103
PS2
103354351410224261322513125527114291046ni8680401011113
SC/ST
6640
173000006825544000
1671120
180981332378000
4921440
489348030390718220537204282180898084000
2824081430
636
1986rest
16446115151148645717
106930
10392199500558879370
17471017532645521095286865257557
141114483651605225074243320032404677
1555373
174610772199
09950
2040
246180244203578
PS1
3010000012100011021111002102301341412140100022104
PS2
103354351510234271423524236627
11429
1247iA.
8690401011113
SC/ST
7460
194000007728650000
1871250
2021111502669000
5531620
5493910
344388062476032293172021009
094000
3174591600
715
1991rest
18466865791289724805
120034
11672469561627987415196211384629762012303219712896261585162641018032527833487224927007611746419
196112102469
01118
02290
276202274228649
PS1
30100000121000110211210031033013414t2150I000*>4.
2104
PS2
10T«.'
364451511334281423624237729
12421012482961005010r\L
1
214
SC/ST
11870
30900000
12245579
. 000
2982000
32217623842314400
8802580
873622054697
1283393959365504322
16050
150000
5047302550
1137
2011rest
29381092921205211521281191054
18563929893998
1571661
3123180
134647298719575111545459996252225886522869402213267753580429612102779667
312019253929
01779
03650
440322.4363631032
PS1
5'020000012100021021121004204401462523270100033205
PS2
12549568t817447313162493724
1111312186415195123149160802022225
Sab-totals: 7244 34427 49 185 8698 41337 55 200 9769 46428 59 219 15546 73882 81 325Totals: 41671 234 50035 255 56197 278 89428 406
IIIII
E - 25
DETERH1NATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS ROMANIA
Year: 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
Year: Population:
* 1971 35315 Growth rate: 1.023 (per annul)1981 44549
1 1986 500351991 561972011 89428
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E - 26
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS VYASNABAR
Year:SC/ST
Village:
KabirpurSultanpurSorayanNathupurBakhraKatheriaDahiaParorwaDariyapurChahia6ovindpurHannapurKhuthaFatehpurSaidpurVyasnagarChanditaraNibupurJeodhipurSinghitaliBharsariaEkauniAiriAiri KaialapurKhzurgaonBhoznaBaghiRasulpurHundikhurdBhanar.ipurBhaisaundiHatherxaHridayapurPurainiMahabalpurMuhanadpurSatpolhrihalokharfundHalaHalhiafilandihChaMaiaterpurDJranaClMttaipurbobariyaSeehupurChandasiBighauliKa^.ankarpurTandiya
22784.152681400
24117400222544433700
4731200
1060908
1243440
794200
5801511230
40210017418029634600
4352225851110
407079
327
1981rest
276612135858816754173124526500
3783508323936397949273245156732400
97314283130
14440
12292105785035182395509365741620
1866401151912176
2301234021802289
PS1
112110120012I2002102011120I10041202112320021i.
4103012
PS2
2314441520022433£»42312004141606133313431013541
1010142
SC/ST
25896173771590
27419800252895038400
5391370
1210
1029
1413920904800
6601721400
45811419820533739400
4952536661260
463090
372
1986rest
314697154977929859197
141830200
43039994744772890410563695867636900
110816294634
16440
13992396585735902726261066654184o
212729131110382002620266424913329
PS1
212110220012120031020111201100412021123200224107•j
012
PS2
231444162000i.
1433652312005141707133323531o13651
1111142
SC/ST
285106191851760
30321900283195542300
5941510
1330
113101564320
995300
7291901550
50512621922637243500
5472797351390
511099
411
1991rest
34776917010781025947217156433300
475440104549480399811654076478440700
1223178
104438
18140
154426472663265130069111767212040
23480414461146221
2891294026
1008363
PS1
21211022001212003102011I2011004120311232003T1.
4107
01T4.
PS2
2415541720022534652312005151807 '2337\f
23531014651
121215nL
SC/ST
4231572831272610
44932400
414738262800
8812240
1980
16815
2316410
1477800
10812812290
74918632433555264500
811414
10902070
7580
147609
2011rest
5141140252159915211405322232049400
704652155073211911480172760496012560400
1813265
154956
26910
2290391
1077937965445
1025174410703020
3471193214517003284288436139
1495539
PS1
212120220012130041020111301100522031223300425104013
PS2
352776210200337356734130082•71
110102544257520259721818163
E - 27
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS VYASNA6AR
Year:
Village:
LeduaBhojpurMahioodpurHinauli
Sub-totals:Totals:
SC/ST
IBS.13
827329
900440659
1981rest
13820
1187672
31655
PS1
2142
69226
PS2
6053
157
SC/ST
21415
942375
1025246297
1986rest
15740
1352765
36044
PS1
2142
72243
PS2
7064
171
SC/ST
23616
1039413
1131451090
1991rest
17370
1492844
39776
PS1
2152
75259
PS2
7064
184
SC/ST
35024
1541613
1677975767
2011rest
25750
22121252
58989
PS1
2173
90351
PS2
11096
261
Year: Population:
1971 34450 Growth rate: 1.019 (per annul)1981 419531986 462961991 510902011 75767
1111111111111111111II
E - 28
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS KANDHAt*M*fw«imtommmMm*«MW«fHm*»****m*m»«»*fm*»*»«**»*HM**Hmt»*»***<
Year:
Village:
HisirpurHansapurSaghatNaxapurKhusipurKadirpurSadalpurLathiaJafarabadNakainHaraonPahariBaneshpurKandxaAvelashpurNasirpurPura UsarKakariattaBhikharipurKanchanpurChitaipurPongalpurKaraundiJagatpurBakhaniHardattpurKarnadandiBairxanPanditpurBansipurDhol apurKilki ChuckDhanpalpurDalhnaBhadwarBandapurKhali IpurDecratashipurSjursfcaif'UrJjQardeopurbancapurDeora ChucktNadrasiKiduraFandpur
SC/ST
120341257677860171200
2812650
217961730
19925016800
3783740
653181953677189128293911553326
143124151180
1310
1200
149
1981rest
115826885986575168795316723450123411722442327629625309358159865236925448193929411351310104469991524812572409215181269171560616563496846464197341165446
PS1
211212231022022102330023033212122212111210OL
0L.
01
PS2
10275693265610312554486346837855648564937545524424
SC/ST
144411468809472205240
3373180
2611152080
23930020200
4544490
78421711443922271543521091863997
172149181220
1570
1440
179
1986rest
1390322103110399028251143798685401482140729327947557503714301919783443305578112735313631573125483910992981509268110662215242056727406765961016557237409198536
PS1
21121223102202210233002304321212221211I21020201
PS2
10275693265610314554486346837865648564937545534424
SC/ST
1624616779010581231270
3793570
2931292330
26833722700
5105040
881244128491042551733951232094488
193167204240
1770
1620
201
1991rest
15623611158116710139261284269756071664158132931388488434174832155879498343649126639615311767140894312343341695324124269917112317558317596691141626
' 266460223601
PS1
21121223102202210233003304321222221211121020201
PS2
1027569326571031555449634683786564B564937545534424
SC/ST
2587326122144167129367430
6035690
4662063710
42753636100
8118030
14013882047716540627562919533371213307266324390
2810
2580
320
2011rest
24855751843185616121474204678155296626482515524499413501341663768342913997925451032201563124362811224015001964532269851519761112272336712021322120810641816996423732354957
PS1
2112122T
1
033022202330044063212223223i222102020L
PS2
10388793375
111132266441464469310129684
11585
1137655844424
E - 29
DETERMINATION OF NUMBERS OF PUBLIC STANDPOSTS KANDHA
Yesr: 1981 1986 1991 2011SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2 SC/ST rest PS1 PS2
Village:
Lal ChuckAiarpurMasi ChuckNai Pura
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
0000
Sub-totals: 6092 32078 69 254 7315 38516 70 258 8215 43259 72 261 13073 68839 85 317Totals: 38170 323 45830 328 51475 333 81913 402
Year: Population:
1971 32347 6ro»th rate: 1.023 (per annul)1981 408051986 458301991 514742011 81912
IIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIII
F - 1
ANNEX F
SCHEME-WISE SUMMARY OF DATA (Sub-Project East I)
SCHEME NAME:TARGET POPULATION:
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
FEROZPUR ( Rae Bareli District )20,600
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.1: installedNo.2: installed500 ra laid, out of a total of 500 mvolume: 350 mstaging: 21 mprogress: 100 % (commissioned)51.5 km laid, out of a total of 51.5 km16 out of 1648 constructed, out of a total of 124130 made, out of an estimated total of 380
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.8 mg/1, depending on
distance between samlping point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
approx. 5 hrs/day on rural feederto be commissioned within month of April, 1985
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME: July 1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 2
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION :
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
RALPUR ( Rae Bareli District )32,000
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed375 m laid, out^of a total of 375 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 22 mprogress: 100 % (completed)88.8 km laid, out of a total of 88.8 km24 out of 24105 constructed, out of a total of 20197 made, out of an estimated total of 536
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.8 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
3 to 6 hrs/day on rural feederlines have been drawn; to be energized before endof April 1985
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : July 1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
F - 3
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN:OVERHEAD TANK
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
GOVINDPUR ( Rae Bareli District )29,890
No.l: constructed (discharge less than anticipated)No.2: constructedNo.3: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.3: constructedNo.1: VT pump/ins tailedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.3: to be procuredNo.l: installedNo.2: installedNo.3: procured375 m laid, out of a total of 375 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 20 mprogress: 100% (completed)82.5 km laid, out of a total of 82.5 km19 out of 1956 constructed, out of a total of 112107 made, out of an estimated total of 476
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 1.0 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
2 to 6 hrs/day ( average: 4.5 hrs/day)lines have been drawn; to be energized before endof April 1985
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : July 1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 4
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION :
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
BHOJPUR ( Rae Bareli District )30,547
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/instailedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed375 m laid, outgOf a total of 375volume: 500 mstaging: 20 mprogress: almost 100% (under testing)76 km laid, out of a total of 77.3 km34 out of 3484 constructed, out of a total of 124300 made, out of an estimated total of 556
m
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.4 - 0.8 rag/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
approx. 4 hrs/day on rural feederlines have been drawn; to be energized before endof April 1985
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : July 1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 5
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION :
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
EXEMPTED FEEDER :
THULENDI ( Rae Bareli District )29,911
No.1: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: procured375 m laid, out3of a total of 375 ravolume: 500 mstaging: 21 mprogress: 60 % (staging for tank wall underprogress)77 km laid, out of a total of 78.25 km19 out of 1965 constructed, out of a total of 18625 made, out of an estimated total of 751
commissioned
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 6
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION :
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
JAGATPUR ( Rae Bareli District )35,800
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructed (has been abandoned; new TW to be
constructed)constructed (not yet developed)constructedwill not be constructednot yet constructedVT pump/instailed
.3:
.1:
.2:
.3:
.1:
NoNoNoNoNoNo.2: -No.3: -No.l: installedNo.2: -No.3: -50 m laid, out of a total of 375volume: 650 mstaging: 20 mprogress: 100% (completed)125 km laid, out of a total of 136.15 km32 out of 32160 constructed, out of a total of 26570 made, out of an estimated total of 735
m
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 rag/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
4.5 to 17 hrs/day ( average: approx. 10 hrs/day)commissioned
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : July 1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 7
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
EXEMPTED FEEDER :
ASHRAFPUR ( Rae Bareli District )26,460
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/ installedNo.2: submersible pump/ installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed25 m laid, out of a total of 550 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 21 mprogress: 45 % (staging completed)64 km laid, out of a total of 69 km20 out of 2060 constructed, out of a total of 18040 made, out of an estimnated total of 633
to be commissioned by mid-May 1985 (permissionfor railway crossing has been obtained)
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985
F - 8
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
UDARI ( Rae Bareli District )25,030
No.l: constructed (cavity well)No.2: constructed (cavity well)No.3: constructed (cavity well)No.l: temporary onlyNo.2: temporary onlyNo.3: temporary onlyNo.l: submersible pump/ installedNo.2: submersible pump/ installedNo.3: submersible pump/ installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installedNo.3: installed340 m laid, out-of a total of 350 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 20 mprogress: 20 % (foundation under construction)65 km laid, out of a total of 91.5 km16 out of 1618 constructed, out of a total of 2040 made, out of a total of 687
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.6 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.6 mg/1 (so far measured at
headworks only; sampling procedure will be changedshortly)
POWER SUPPLY :'EXEMPTED FEEDER
6 hrs/day (rostered) through rural feederSEE has not started any activity yet
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME(Direct pumping started in March 1985.)
March 1986
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 9
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
BANNAMAU ( Rae Bareli District )41,945
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed400 m laid, out.of a total of 400 m.volume: 800 mstaging: 24 mprogress: 90% (top dome completed)139.5 km laid, out of a total of 139.5 kra27 out of 27240 constructed, out of a total of 24090 made, out of an estimated total of 984
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.6 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.4 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworksEXEMPTED FEEDER : commissioned; high-voltage problem
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : May 1985
I*. "IIIiiiiIiiIiiiiiiiii
F - 10
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
CHLORINE DOSAGE :RESIDUAL CHLORINE :
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER :
BEHTAKALAN45,600
( Rae Bareli District )
No.l: constructed (has been abandoned)No.2: constructedNo.3: constructed (to be developed)No.l: constructed (to be used as storage)No.2: constructedNo.3: to be constructedNo.l: submersible pump/ removed and used elsewhereNo.2: VT pump/instailedNo.3: not yet procuredNo.l: not yet procuredNo.2: installedNo.3: procured400 m laid, out of a total of 400 mvolume: 800 rastaging: 22 raprogress: 90% (top dome completed)125.7 km laid, out of a total of 125.7 km34 out of 34223 constructed, out of a total of 22385 made, out of an estimated total of 1205
0.6 to 0.8 mg/10.6 to 0.8 mg/1 (measured near pump house!)
2.5 to 8.5 hrs/dayto be commissioned by end of April 1985
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : June 1985
II1I1IIIIIIIIIIIIII1I
F - 11
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
SAIDABAD ( Allahabad District )23,600
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructed under previous programmeNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed423 m laid, out-of a total of 423 mvolume: 650 mstaging: 16 mprogress: 100 % (completed)71 km laid, out of a total of 65 km19 out of 1977 constructed, out of a total of 168384 made, out of an estimated total of 337
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 1.0 to 1.2 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 1.0 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
EXEMPTED FEEDER commissioned
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : Mid-1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
F - 12
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
NIDURA ( Allahabad District )20,400
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed380 m laid, out3of a total of 380 mvolume: 650 mstaging: 20 mprogress: 100 % (completed)66 km laid, out of a total of 53 km20 out of 2070 constructed, out of a total of 145384 made, out of an estimated total of 300
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.4 - 0.8 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
EXEMPTED FEEDER commissioned
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : July 1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
II1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 13
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
CHLORINE DOSAGE :
PRATAPPUR (Ghurdauli Zone) ( Allahabad District )24,200
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed360 m laid, out^of a total of 360 m.volume: 800 mstaging: 20 raprogress: 100 % (commissioned)104 km laid, out of a total of 104 km31 out of 3155 constructed, out of a total of 174120 made, out of an estimated total of 416
0.5 - 0.6 mg/1 (?)
RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending ondistance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER :
average of 13 hrs/dayto be commissioned by end of 1985/mid-1986 ?
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : Mid-1985 (except forexempted feeder)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 14
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION :
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
EXEMPTED FEEDER :
URWA ( Allahabad District )20,300
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed350 m laid, out^of a total of 350 mvolume: 500 mstaging: 14 mprogress: 100 % (completed)69 km laid, out of a total of 64 km.23 out of 2346 constructed, out of a total of 190355 made, out of an estimated total of 290
because of power availability of 20 - 24 hrs/dayno exempted feeder applied for
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : Mid-1985(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 15
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
MIRZAMURAD57,920
( Varanasi District )
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: submersible pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed380 m laid, out of a total of 380 ravolume: 1000 mstaging: 22 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)100.6 km laid, out of a total of 100.3 km50 out of 50129 constructed, out of a total of 266554 made, out of an estimated total of 580
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.4 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
approx. 4-5 hrs/dayre-commissioned by December 1984; trouble again(dacoit-infested area)
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985 ?(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
II
F - 16
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
CHLORINE DOSAGE :RESIDUAL CHLORINE
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
IN
TIKRI ( Varanasi District )61,560
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/instailedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed235 m laid, out-of a total of 235 mvolume: 1200 mstaging: 22 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)61.4 km laid, out of a total of 61.4 km27 out of 2795 constructed, out of a total of 209450 made, out of an estimated total of 410
0.6 mg/1DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
18-20 hrs/daycommissioned
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985 ?(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
IIII1IIIIIIII1iIf1III
F - 17
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
SEWAPURI ( Varanasi District )32,200
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/instailedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed250 ra laid, out of a total of 250 mvolume: 600 mstaging: 16 mprogress: 100% (completed)46.5 km laid, out of a total of 46.5 km30 out of 3060 constructed, out of a total of 117160 made, out of an estimated total of 215
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.5 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
18-20 hrs/daycommissioned in January 1984
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985 ?(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
IIIItIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 18
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
HARHUA ( Varanasi District )57,585
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed350 m laid, out_of a total of 350 mvolume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)129.2 km'laid, out of a total of 129.5 km.75 out of 75130 constructed, out of a total of 236550 made, out of an estimated total of 550
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.6 - 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY : Generator set installed and commissioned(Average of 6 hours' supply on rural feeder)
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985 ?(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
IIIIiiIiiiiiiiiiiiiii
F - 19
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
BIRAONKOT63,130
( Varanasi District )
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: submersible pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed370 m laid, out_of a total of 380 mvolume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)132.4 km laid, out of a total of 132.4 km46 out of 46110 constructed, out of a total of 264300 made, out of an estimated total of 600
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.4 - 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.1 - 0.3 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
12-14 hrs/dayre-commissioned
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985 ?(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIII
F - 20
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
VYASNAGAR61,238
( Varanasi District )
No.1: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/instailedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed1300 m laid, out of a total of 1300 (350) m.volume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100 % (completed)86.8 km laid, out of a total of 90 km.52 out of 5270 constructed, out of a total of 226300 made, out of an estimated total of 550
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.7-0.9 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.1 - 0.7 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY :EXEMPTED FEEDER
6 hrs/day (I); 18-20 hrs/day (II)not yet commissioned because of railway crossing(for TW No. 1; TW No. 2 already has power forapprox. 20 hrs/day due to vicinity of fertilizerfactory)
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985 ?(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 21
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM:VILLAGES COVERED:PUBLIC STANDPOST:PRIVATE CONNECTIONS:
ROHANIA ( Varanasi District )62,507
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/installedNo.2: VT pump/procuredNo.l: installedNo.2: procured250 m laid, out3of a total of 250 ravolume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100% (completed89.1 km laid, out of a total of 23441 out of 41100 constructed, out of a total of 234644 made, out of an estimated total of 600
CHLORINE DOSAGE: 0,8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
POWER SUPPLY:EXEMPTED FEEDER:
22-24 hrs/daycommissioned in March 1984
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985 ?(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
F - 22
SCHEME NAME :TARGET POPULATION :
TUBEWELLS :
PUMP HOUSES :
PUMPS :
CHLORINATORS :
RISING MAIN :OVERHEAD TANK :
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVILLAGES COVERED :PUBLIC STANDPOSTS :PRIVATE CONNECTIONS
KANDWA ( Varanasi District )57,255
No.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: constructedNo.2: constructedNo.l: VT pump/instailedNo.2: VT pump/installedNo.l: installedNo.2: installed300 m laid, out.of a total of 350 mvolume: 1000 mstaging: 18 mprogress: 100% (commissioned)91 km laid, out of a total of 110 km48 out of 48100 constructed, out of a total of 323245 made, out of an estimated total of 555
CHLORINE DOSAGE : 0.8 mg/1RESIDUAL CHLORINE IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM : 0.2 - 0.6 mg/1, depending on
distance between sampling point and headworks
EXEMPTED FEEDER : commissioned, but power available for only 6-7hrs/day (will be increased in near future)
PROBABLE MONTH OF FINAL COMMISSIONING OF SCHEME : September 1985 ?(commissioned except for increased number of public standposts)
G - 1
ANNEX G
INDIA
UTTAR PRADESH RURAL WATER SUPPLY PROJECT
DUTCH CREDIT PROGRAMMEREPORT FOR PRE APPRAISAL OF
SUB PROJECT-KEAST) (REVISED)
INSTALMENT-1
FOR
NARANASIAND ALLAHABAD DISTRICTS
APRIL 1985
UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM
G - 2
IIIII
UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM
_ " REPORT
• ON PRE-APPRAISAL OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY SCHEMES
I UNDER DUTCH CREDIT PROGRAMME
ISUB PROJECT - II - EAST ( Revised )
INSTALLMENT - I
II DISTRICTS VARANASI & ALLAHABAD
IApril 1985
IIIIIII
G - 3
TEAM -
: PREPARED BY :
Er. R^DAYAL
Er. A.C.SAXENA
Er. A.K.GUPTA
. A.C.NAGAR
I CHIEF ENGII II
S MANAGER ( APPRAISAL )
: MANAGER ( APPRAISAL )
DY, MANAGER ( APPRAISAL )
: Typed By :
Mrs. REETA DEY KIRTY: STENOGRAPHER
: Drawings By :
Sri RASHID MOBIN : COMPUTOR
Sri WALIULLAH DRAFTSMAN,
G - 4
PKADESHREH)RT ON FRE-APPKAISAL OF RURAL WATER SUPPLY
III• . PROJECT UNDER DUTCH CREDIT PKOGHAKME SUB_ PROJECT II - EAST (Revised)-Installment II IN DISTRICTS VARANASl AND AI.fAHABAD
| 1.0 INTRODUCTION
Under "Che Dtrcch credit programme sub projecrc-II
• (east) was originally prepared for 5 rural water supply
• schemes covering 137 villages and costing Rs. 340 lacsin April 1981 and submitted to the Dutch Govt* In
I January 1982 as per latest directions of the Govt, of
India, the proposals: were reconsidered and it was
8 decided to install hand pumps, wherever feasible« inplace of piped water supply schemes-. Consequently
• original proposals were recasted and the villages to
• . be covered with hand pumps were included in sub-project-
III (east & west) and only one piped water supply
| scheme covering 25 villages of Allahabad diatt, and
_ another 2 schemes of Raebareli district covering 28
• villages were included in sub-Project -II (east)and
• these proposals were still under consideration of
Dutch Govt, till recently. However for the reasons:
• of urgancy, these schemes have been executed under
other programmes of Govt. of India and Govt, of U.P,
• During the discussions held with Mission -10
• (U.P.) at Lucknow on October 10th & 11th, 1984, itwas agreed upon that U.P.Jal Nigam will put up sjome
I fresh proposals under subproject II-£ast (Revised)
II
G - 5
IIII
to an amount of the same order as originally proposedg for sub project-II (See. Mission report- U.F.-10_ page 22). Latter on the Dutch Mission indicated that• this amount can be further increased by an equal• amounts
Accordingly two packages of projects were
• proposed and submitted aa forecast of cast in
February 1985 and March 1985 respectively. The first• package was christiuaed as Installment-I Covering two
• . districts viz* Varanasi & Allahabad. In Varanasi• districts, 9 schemes were suggested covering 179 villages
• at am tentative cost of Rs. 591.16 lacs and 2 schemes
were suggested in Allahabad district covering 23 villages
I at am tentative cost of Rs. 140,00 lacs.
M The second package to be christened as Install-ment -II was proposed with 15 schemes of Varanasi
fl district duly covering 230 villages at am tentativecost of Rs. 766.1? lacs.
I Meanwhile detailed projects for only 8 schemes
• - of Varanasi district, covering 166 villagea at an• estimated cost of Rs 581.83 lacs and 1 scheme of.
• Allahabad district, covering 11: villagea at an estimated
cost of Rs. 90.23 lacs have been prepared and proposed
• to be included in Installment-I. These projects are
under appraisal of U.P.Jal Nigam appraisal cell and
• slight variations may be expected in their final costs,
• which can not be ruled out at this stage as a result
of an going appraisal of these schemes*
I
II G - 6
• A table showing variation in forecast of coat
• submitted earlier and the detailed projects is enclosed
as annexure I for easy reference.
| As regards the preparation of detailed projects, of
schemes under Installment II, the work is being started
• and is expected to be completed in the due course
• . of time.
2.0 PROCEDURE FOR SELECTION OF VILLAGES
• The scarcity/problem villages as included in the
declared list of scarcity villages as per 1972 assessment
• and those± included in the declared list of scarcity/
• problem villages by the. District Magistrates of the
respective districts in 1984—85, have been selected to
I be included in the proposed piped water supply scheme.
The non-scarcity/problem villages lying with in the
| economical grouping have also been included,
_ In some villages few hand pumps were installed,
• But due to the fact that the quality of water available
• from these Hand Pumps is not safe for long term human
consumption and also due to be reason that the general
• water table in the area goes down below fiO to 59 metresbelow ground level, these hand pumps can not be relied
• upon as a permanent solution to the water scarcity
• problem especially during the lean summer months.
Consequently, instead of going for the saturation of
• villages with hand pumpa, piped water supply schemes
are proposed, as it will be clear from the forth-coming
II
G - 7
paras that deep tubewellsr. apart trom delivering a
|| a good quality of water, can given required quantity of
potable water and thus. we can find a listing solution
™ of the drinking water problem.
• The villages included in these projects are
therefore, selected and included the basis of above
• criteria.
| 3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA
• 3»1 Design Period
The projects are designed to cater the needes of
| the population for a period of 30 years. The base year
• being taken as 1987 and design year 2017.
3.2 Design Population
li The design populations if projected on compound
growth rate basis for the last decades, increases; very
• high and becomes unrealistic. Therefore the future
• population growth rate was based as those which
emerges out from the census of 1971 for the respective
• tehsils and applied an a linear basis but under the
condition that the technical life spaTja of each project
• will not be less than 20 years in ease the so called
• compound growth rate is calculated for. This was
• confirmed by Mr. J.A.Speets; water supply coordinator of
• Royal Motherlands Embassy, New Delhi vide his letter
no. 133/JS/hm dated January 4, 1985*
II
G - 8.
III• 3»3 Rate of Water Supply
I The rate of water supply for individual village
is taken as 70 l.p.c.do
3,4 Source of water supplyI Tubewells are taken as source of water supply
as these are successful in the area*
| It is assumed that it will run for not more than_ 16 houres a day. Min-ipniin 2 numbers of tubewells are
• provided even if the requirement is less and is wholly
• met from one tubewell only.
3*5 Treatment
• The source of water being tubewell and water
• available is normally safe and potable. Hence only
chlorination is proposed for disinfection of water.
W 3*6 Pumping plants
M Electric driven borehole vertical turbine /
™ submersible pumping plants are proposed to be installed
• over the tubewells for the requirement of 15 years only.*O Q&a&KK.
I 3.7 POWER SUPPLY
• Three alternatives were explored to find an economic
solution of power supply to pumping plants as detailed
• below :-
£ 1 . Power obtained from separate exempted feeder• 2. Power taken from rural feeder and increasing• number of tubewells.. and storage capacity of• clear water.
I
G - 9
III• 3« Power from rural feeder and generators.
• A power feasibility report has been prepared
for each scheme and attached with its; detailed estimate,
I The most economical alternative has been found in
alternative I i.e. power obtained from separate feeder,
| in each of the schemes under this sub project.
• 3*8 Rising Main
Economical size of rising main from tubewellL
• to storage reservoir is worked out by calculating
the cost of pipes including laying and capitalising
m • the cost of its repairs, maintenance and power• consumption charges for different sizes of pipes and
depreciation. C. I, pipes- upto first 200 in length
I from tubewell have been used and A.C. «*f pipes: for the
rest of the lengths.I•' 3,9 Storage reservoir
• The minimum storage provided is not less than
8 hours of daily supply at the end of design period
I as the draw off pattern in rural areas is not very
defenite.
3*10 Distribution mainI These are designed for peak flow cquivelant to
2,4 times the average flow, on the baias of Hazen &
| William formula allowing the variation in hydraulic
• head at any Hode to be maximum of 60 cm. The value of
• Hazen william coefficient 'c1 is taken as 100 for G.I,
• and C.I, pipes and 120 for A.C, and P.V,C. pipes.
I
G - 10
III•' Since the ground conditions are favourable, A,C. & P.V.C
• pipes have been preferred over C,I,pipes on account of
their lower cost, easy availability, transportation and
I handling. Rigid P.V.C. pipes upto 225 mm outer dia and
A.C. pipes of 250 to 300 mm inner dia pipes have been
I used* For higher diameters C.I. pipes are to be used.
M The minimum size of pipe is kept as 32 mm outer dia.
3#11i Terminal pressure
I As the buildings in the area are mostly single
storeyed, a minimum terminal pressure of 6 metres has
p been kept.
_ 3.12 Stand posts;
™ Vandal proof pillar type stand posts are proposed
• at the rate of ane stand post per 250 persons.. These are
invariably & sepexately provided to the scheduled caste
w population and the weaker section of society in each
village / hamlet even if the population is less than
• 250 persons. It. has also been ensured that the users
• have not to walk more than 150 m to fetch water
from stand posts.
I 4.0 POPULATION PROJECTION
_ Population has been projected for 1987 and
• 2017 inaccordance with para 3.2, of this report. The
• last decadal growth in Varanasi tehsil is 26.36#, in
Gyanpur tehsil 33~.56# and in Chandauli tehsil 21.29# so
• far as the Varanasi district is concerned. In case of
Allahabad district the last decadal growth in ManihanpurI tehsil is 25.84%.
I
G - ! I
The present and design population have been
projected on the basis of linear projection of last
decadal growth is the tehsi} concerned for rural
areas through 1971-81.•
5.0 TECHNICAL DESIGNS
The schemes have feeen designed strictly in
| accerdance with design criteria diftAribed in para 3.0.of this report.
6.0 GEOHYDROLOGICAL ASPECTS
I As already stated in para 3.4. of this report,tubewells are successful in the area according to
I the information gathered from the Central Ground Water
_ Board. Ihe tubewells already bored in the area by
J.al Nigam for other drinking water supply schemes are• normally 100 to 150 m deep giving a\ safe discharge from
1400 l.p.m. to 2200 l,p,m. The irrigation dept-t.
| tubewells are giving a bit more discharge in sane areas.
_ The water quality of th se tubewells is also reported
• - to be with in safe limits*
I It is -therefore, clear that tubewells can safely
be proposed as reliable source of water supply for these
I schemes.
. 7.0 PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
According to the forecast of cost already
• submitted the tentative cost of sub project II- East
(Revised) Installment -I was proposed as below :-
II
G - 12
IIII• Varanasi district - Ra. 591.16 lacs (9 schemes)
• Allahabad district - Ra. 140.00 lacs: (2 schemes)
• total : Rs* 731*16 lacs
I ' So far only 8 detailed schemes of Varanasi
district andlscheme of Allahabad district could be
ft proposed and are now being proposed under Installment-
• !• There cost estimates are as below :-
Varanasi district Rs » 581,83 lac (8 scheme)
I Allahabad district Rs. 90.23 lac (1 scheme)
Ra. 672.06 laca
• These schemes are still under appraisal of the
U.P.Jal Nigam appraisal cell and slight variation
• in their costa can not be ruled out art the stage as
• . a result of the appraisal.
8.0 TIMING AND PHASING
^ 8.1 It is expected that the final appraisal report
• to sub project II East (Revised) Installment-I
including 8 schemes of Varanasi district and 1 scheme
• of Allahabad district, will be submitted to Dutch Govt,
for approval sometimes in May 1985 and green signalI to start the execution of these schemes will be
• available by July 1985.
It is, therefore, proposed to start the work
I on these schemes in July 1985 and is proposed to be
completed by the end of December 1987.
I
G - 13
IIII - 10 -
I• 8.2 The works are proposed under various
phases as per essential constructional activities
I and requirements. The disbursement of funds
shall be proposed accordingly in the final
m Appraisal report*
IIII1IIIIIIII
UTTAR PRADESH RURAL V/ATER SUPPLY PROJECT
SUBPROJECT
UNDER DUTCH CREDIT PROGRAMME
II (EAST) (Revised) INSTALMENT- I
DISTRICT VARANASI & ALLAHABAD
Table showing variation in forecast of cost and detailed
No. of village s coveredSINo
in C20. Mane of Scheme fore cast of Detailed Design/[p• cost Project of schem
HY)opulatione ire
project
Total Project costEstimate in(Lac.Rs.)
fore cast Detailed forecast Detailedof cost Project of cost Project
1. 2 3 4 5 6 7
DISTRICT - VARANASITehsil i Cyanpur
1.
2.
3.
4.5.
6.
7.
Inargaon gr.of vill.W/Sscheme
Kasldaha gr.of vill.W/Sscheme
Rohi gr. of vill. W/Sscheme
iairi bisa " «'Biranpur " "
Tehsil : Varanasi
Jansa gr.of
Hathi Barni
vill. ¥/SScheme
gr*of Vill W/S
20
It-
351717
24
26
20
11
351717
24
26
36500
32630
389423668024800
25400
25860
36500
32630
389423668026800
25415
25860
74
67
827462
63
64
.51
.34
.97
.45
.00
.50
.65
79
72
897872
62
63
a
o
.65 -.0
•31
.64
.86
.88
.95
.13Scheme
Contd..........2
•1 2
Tehsil t Chandauli
8. Awajapur gr.of vill«W/SScheme
* W9. Mahadapur gr.of vill.Vf/SScheme
Total Jbr-Varanasi DistrictDISTRICT -ALLAHABADTehsil Manihanpur '
1 . Chhekwa group pofvillages. W/S scheme
* *2. Kosam Khiraj group ofvillages W./S scheme
Total for Allahabaddistrict
Grand Total for thesub project
3 4
16 16
13
179 t66
11 11
12
23 11
202 177
5
19900
20788
263500
26530
29570
561:00
319600
fc
19900
-
242727
26530
-
26530
269257
7
49.75
51 .97
591.16
66.00
74.00
140.00
731.16
8
62.21
-
581 .83
oiUl
90.23
-
90.23
672.06
* * Detailed project not prepared and not included in Installment - I.
MASTER PLAN OF DISTRICT VARANASJm. .1 • LEV. 4 ?
UMDER DUTCH CREDIT 5t"B PROJ E.CT-U tASTINSTALLMtNT -I -
1 INARGAOHZ K.A3ICU.MA5A
5 BIRAMPUR6. JANSA7- MATMIfl.
NATIONAL HIGHWAYRAILWAY L I N L B-Q
3CWIMI UMOU t«CUT»N
ALNIGAM
oI
\ o•»
I ° ' s * R i c r
5 —
fi\W\\Iliuniis s j l S f l ! ?a ^ < i i i § uI S 5 l 5 ? f ? R*• f 1 ! - - » . » ,
/!i!fiin
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
H - 1
ANNEX H
SALIENT FEATURES OF SCHEMES PROPOSED FOR REPLACEMENT OF OLD SUB-PROJECTII (EAST), NOW SUB-PROJECT IV (design population not yet adapted)
Scheme name
BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villages
Population
ROHI
Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment
Overhead tank:
GyanpurGyanpurVaranasi35 inhabited + 5 uninhabited12 scarcity + 23 non-scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 21187intermediate stage (2002): 30054final stage (2017) : 3894270 litres per capita and per daygroundwater
: tubewell: safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1
maximum 2.0 mg/1material: reinforced concretecapacity: 1000 m3
20 mstaging :Distribution system:
peak demand rateterminal pressure
Public standpostPrivate connections (target)
Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost
Annual maintenance costs
Per capita maintenance costs
Cost of water per 1000 litres
: 2.4 times average demand: minimummaximum
198720022017
198720022017198720022017198720022017198720022017
6.00 m19.33 m160 Nos.182 Nos.
1074 Nos.1669 Nos.Rs. 8.946 millionRs. 423Rs. 298Rs. 230Rs. 151,600Rs. 215,300Rs. 298,300Rs . 7. 15 per annumRs. 7. 16 per annumRs. 7.66 per annumRs. 0.37Rs. 0.37Rs. 0.40
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
H - 2
Scheme name
BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villages
Population
Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment
KASIDAHA
GyanpurGyanpurVaranasi11 inhabited, of which:11 scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 17760intermediate stage (2002): 25190final stage (2017) : 3263070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewellsafety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 rag/1
maximum 1.0 mg/1Overhead tank: material: reinforced concrete
capacity: 750 m3staging : 18 m
Distribution system:peak demand rate : 2.4 times average demandterminal pressure:
Public standpostPrivate connections (target)
Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost
Annual maintenance costs
Per capita maintenance costs
Cost of water per 1000 litres
: minimur
198720022017
198720022017198720022017198720022017198720022017
n: 6.00 ra104 Nos.152 Nos.900 Nos.
1398 Nos.Rs. 7.231 millionRs. 407Rs. 287Rs. 222Rs. 130,600Rs. 200,100Rs. 278,800Rs. 7.35 per annumRs . 7.94 per annumRs . 8.54 per annumRs. 0.38Rs. 0.42Rs. 0.45
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
H - 3
Scheme name
BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villages
Population
Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment
BIRAMPUR
Gyanpur and SuriyawanGyanpurVaranasi17 inhabited, of which:17 scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 14570intermediate stage (2002): 20675final stage (2017) : 2680070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewellsafety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1
maximum 1.0 mg/1Overhead tank: material: reinforced concrete
capacity: 750 m3staging : 20 m
Distribution system:peak demand rate : 2.4 times average demandterminal pressure: minimum: 6.00 m
Public standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1987
20022017
Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost : 1987
2002: 2017
Annual maintenance costs : 198720022017
Per capita maintenance costs : 198720022017
Cost of water per 1000 litres : 198720022017
18 Nos.125 Nos.740 Nos.
1157 Nos.Rs. 7.288 million
500353272107,000163,800237,8007.34 per annum7.92 per annum8.87 per annum0.380.410.46
Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
H - 4
Scheme name
BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villages
Population
Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment
BAIRIBISA
DeeghGyanpurVaranasi17 inhabited + 8 uninhabited7 scarcity + 10 non-scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 19960intermediate stage (2002): 28320final stage (2017) : 3668070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewe11safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1maximum 1.0 mg/1
Overhead tank: material: reinforced concretecapacity: 1000 m3staging : 20 m
Distribution system:peak demand rate :terminal pressure:
Public standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1(
2<21
Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost : 1!
21: 21
Annual maintenance costs : 1!212(
Per capita maintenance costs : 1!2121
Cost of water per 1000 litres : 1!
2.4 times average demandminimum
870217
870217870217870217870217
6.00 m131 Nos.171 Nos.
1011 Nos.1572 Nos.Rs. 7.886 millionRs. 395Rs. 278Rs. 215Rs. 145,700Rs. 221,500Rs. 304,200Rs. 7.30 per annumRs. 7.82 per annumRs. 8.29 per annumRs. 0.38Rs. 0.41-Rs. 0.43
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
H - 5
Scheme name : INARGAON
GyanpurVaranasi20 inhabited + 16 uninhabited16 scarcity + 4 non-scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 19700intermediate stage (2002): 28000final stage (2017) : 3650070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewellsafety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1
maximum 1.0 mg/1Overhead tank: material: reinforced concrete
capacity: 1000 m3staging: 20 m
Distribution system:peak demand rate: 2.4 times average demand
TehsilDistrictNo. of villages
Population
Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment
terminal pressure: minimumPublic standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1987
20022017
Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost : 1987
20022017
Annual maintenance costs : 198720022017
Per capita maintenance costs : 198720022018
Cost of water per 1000 litres : 198720022017
6.00 m106 Nos.169 Nos.
1000 Nos.1564 Nos.Rs. 7.965 million
404284218143,100219,100303,600
Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.
.26
.83
.32
.38
.41
per annumper annumper annum
0.43
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
H - 6
Scheme name
BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villagesPopulation
Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment
AWAJAPUR
DhamapurChandauliVaranasi16 inhabited + 1 uninhabitedinitial stage (1987) : 12700intermediate stage (2002) : 16300final stage (2017) : 19900
: 70 litres per capita and per day: groundwater: tubewell: safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1
maximum 1.0 mg/1
Overhead tank: material: reinforced concretecapacity: 750 m3staging : 18 m
Distribution system:peak demand rate m: 2.4 timesterminal pressure: minimum
Public standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1987
20022017
Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost : 1987
20022017 '
Annual maintenance costs : 198720022017
Per capita maintenance costs : 198720022017
Cost of water per 1000 litres : 198720022017
average demand6.00 m63 Nos.109 Nos.582 Nos.853 Nos.Rs. 6.241 millionRs. 491Rs. 383Rs. 314Rs. 113,500Rs. 167,800Rs. 235,200Rs. 8.94 per annumRs. 10.29 per annumRs. 11.82 per annumRs. 0.46Rs. 0.54Rs. 0.62
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
H - 7
Scheme name
BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villages
Population
Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment
HATHI BARNI
SewapuriVaranasiVaranasi26 inhabited + 2 uninhabited26 scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 15400intermediate stage (2002) : 20630final stage (2017) : 2586070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewellsafety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1
maximum 1.0 mg/1
Overhead tank: material: reinforced concretecapacity: 750 m3staging : 18 m
Distribution system:peak demand rate m: 2.4 timesterminal pressure: minimum
Public standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1987
20022017
Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost : 1987
20022017
Annual maintenance costs : 198720022017
Per capita maintenance costs : 198720022017
Cost of water per 1000 litres : 198720022017
average demand6.00 m94 Nos.132 Nos.736 Nos.1100 Nos.Rs. 6.313 millionRs. 410Rs. 306Rs. 244Rs. 112,500Rs. 164,900Rs. 213,600Rs. 7.30 per annumRs. 7.99 per annumRs. 8.26 per annumRs. 0.30Rs. 0.41Rs. 0.43
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
H - 8
Scheme name
BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villages
Population
Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment
JANSA
SewapuriVaranasiVaranasi21 inhabited + 3 uninhabited21 scarcityinitial stage (1987) 15120intermediate stage (2002) 20275final stage (2017) 2541570 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewe11safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1
maximum 1.0 mg/1
Overhead tank: material: reinforced concretecapacity: 750 m3staging : 18 ro
Distribution system:peak demand rate m: 2.4 timesterminal pressure: minimum
Public standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1987
20022017
Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost : 1987
20022017
Annual maintenance costs : 198720022017
Per capita maintenance costs : 198720022017
Cost of water per 1000 litres : 198720022017
average demand6.00 m82 Nos.130 Nos.725 Nos.
1090 Nos.Rs. 6.295 million
416310248118,000171,400215,5007.80 per annum8.45 per annum
Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.
8.48 per annum0.400.440.44
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
H - 9
Scheme name
BlockTehsilDistrictNo. of villages
Population
Rate of water supplyNature of sourceSourceTreatment
CHHEKAWA
KaushambiManihanpurAllahabad11 inhabited, of which:8 scarcity + 3 non-scarcityinitial stage (1987) : 15877final stage (2017) : 2653070 litres per capita and per daygroundwatertubewe11safety chlorination (bleaching powder solution)dosing capacity: minimum 0.5 mg/1
maximum 2.0 mg/1
Overhead tank: material: reinforced concretecapacity: 650 m3staging : 16 m
Distribution system:peak demand rate m: 2.4 timesterminal pressure: minimum
maximumPublic standpostPrivate connections (target) : 1987
20022017
Estimated capital cost:Per capita cost : 1987
20022017
Annual maintenance costs : 198720022017
Per capita maintenance costs : 198720022017
Cost of water per 1000 litres : 198720022017
average demand17.14 m6.00 m83 Nos.136 Nos.757 Nos.1137 Nos.Rs. 9.023 million
568425340113,700170,500233,9007.16 per annum
Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.Rs.
8.04 per annum8.82 per annum0.280.310.35