report sa management
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
1/16
BY GROUP 5
MEMBERS:
ALJUN SIKAT
JENILYN SARDA
MARIEL ANN MANTILLA
KRISTINE MAE LANTACA
SHIELA rivera
FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STANDARDIZATION
BUREAUCRATIC AND ORGANIC STRUCTURES
BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURES
ORGANIC STRUCTURESDESIGNING THE ORGANIZATION
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
2/16
FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STANDARDIZATION
Work can also be standardized by redefining the flow
of operations.
Technology often dictates workflow.
FOR EXAMPLE:
Assembly line system represents a sequential flow of
operations.
A tire cannot be installed on a new car before the
wheel assembly is attached to an axle ; similarly ,
brakes cannot be tested until the tires are in place.
The sequential flow of operations dictates a standard
pattern of work organization.
FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STANDARDIZATION
BY: ALJUN SIKAT
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
3/16
Standardization may also result from managementpolicies and legal mandates ranging from safety
procedures to equal opportunity laws.
Laws and rules impose constraints and lead to internal
policies and procedures to guide managementdecisions.
Policies and procedures do not necessary impose
constraints , but they do define preferred behavior.
Laws and rules, policies and procedures tend tostandardize human effort.
The stereotype of a standardized organization is
bureaucracy in which jobs are formalized and workflow
is prescribed.
FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STANDARDIZATIONBY: ALJUN SIKAT
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
4/16
BUREAUCRATIC AND ORGANIC STRUCTURES Formalized organizations, particularly in the public
sector , tend to be labeled bureaucracies.
BUREAUCRACYS FORM OF ORGANIZATION:
Is one in which activities are rationally defined.
Division of work is unambiguous
Managerial authority is explicitly vested in
individuals according to skills and responsibilitiesprescribed for their organizations.
It implies a less rigorous division of labor in a less
formal environment.
BUREAUCRATIC AND ORGANIC STRUCTURES
BY: JENNILYN T. SARDA
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
5/16
The fundamental difference between
bureaucratic and organic
organizations is in the degree of
formalization Organic implies a
flexible entity , one full of life .
Both stereotypes may be unrealistic.
BUREAUCRATIC AND ORGANIC STRUCTURES
BY: JENNILYN T. SARDA
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
6/16
The German sociologist Max Webercoined the word Bureaucracy.
he has been credited with creating an
organization form that has DominatedWestern Civilization during the twentiethcentury , one of that is Flexible , Formal ,Coldly , Rational and Dehumanizing.
he merely described and put a name inwhat he saw in European Organizationsat the turn of its century.
BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURES
BY : MARIEL ANN MANTILLA
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
7/16
FIGURE 9.5 WEBERS IDEAL BUREAUCRACY
Manager are careerprofessionals, not
owners of units they
manage.
Jobs broken downinto simple , routine ,
and well-defined
tasks.
Positions organizedin a hierarchy with
a clear chain of
command.
Career Orientation
Impersonality
Division of Labor
Bureaucracy should
have
Formal Rules and
Regulations
Authority Hierarchy
Formal Selections
Uniform application
of rules and controls
, not according to
personalities.
System of written
rules and standard
operating
procedures.
People selected for
jobs based on technical
qualifications.
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
8/16
1. FIXED AND OFFICIAL JURISDICTIONS OF AUTHORITY Are governed by rules and regulations that fix decisions-
making parameters , align specific duties , and strictly define
command privileges.
2. FIRMLY ESTABLISHED RATIONAL CHAINS OFCOMMAND
Graded levels of authority are structured in an absolute
hierarchy with a narrow span of control over subordinates.
It is the positions that are defined , not the individuals whomeet defined criteria ; positions are not redefined to suit
individuals characteristics.
FIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN BUREAUCRACIES
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
9/16
A CHAIN OF COMMAND Is the unbroken line of authority between the lowest and the
highest positions in an organization.
A SPAN OF CONTROL
Is defined by the number of subordinates one managersupervises.
3. QUANTIFIED AND THROUGHLY DOCUMENTEDINFORMATION
Nearly everything is reduced to writing in bureaucracy:
decisions and conferences are recorded , files are maintained ,and allocations are quantified , which creates complexadministration system.
FIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN BUREAUCRACIES
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
10/16
4. SUPPOSITION OF EXPERTISE Because positions are filled by individuals who have
met defined criteria , it is assumed that people at each
skill levels have expertise.
5. ART OF MANAGEMENT
Is recognized as important , managers of
bureaucratic organizations rely on rules and
procedures. A technically scientific management process , the
bureaucracy is viewed as Inflexible , Formal , Coldly
Rational , And Dehumanizing.
FIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN BUREAUCRACIES
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
11/16
ORGANIC STRUCTURES In the classic 1966 article The Coming Death of Bureaucracy ,
theorist Warren Bennis heavily criticized bureaucracies and
proposed that we create organic organizations.
HIS OBSERVATIONS AND IDEAS: Our need for rational form of organization modeled on machine
efficiency and explicit , inflexible lines of authority is outdated.
Webers ideal of rational organization was a response to the
irrational world of work of the Victorian age , whenemployees labored under capricious managers and subjective
rules.
Formalized organizations brought order and provided employees
with protection.
ORGANIC STRUCTURES
BY: KRISTINE MAE LANTACA
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
12/16
In contrast , Bennis believes todays world of rapidchange , complex technology , and diversified
knowledge requires flexible patterns of organization.
Bureaucracies are ill-adapted to the evolving
management philosophy of humanistic values with
democratic ideals.
In place of bureaucracy , Bennis has proposed flexible
organizations ; with executive as coordinates andemployees organized according to their personal skills.
His article heralded the arrival of organizations based
on groups of projects rather than of stratified authority.
ORGANIC STRUCTURES
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
13/16
CONTINGENCY THEORY AND ORGANIZATIONALSTRUCTURES
Contingency theory implies that organizations must be
capable of adapting to situations under various
circumstances.
Researchers have categorized factors into four basic
concerns:
1. The organizations age and size
2. Its technology and that of the industry
3. Environmental forces that influence decisions
4. Power and personal attributes of the organizations
management
DESIGNING THE ORGANIZATION:
BY : SHIELA
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
14/16
Age and size of the organization usually define theneed for approximately elaborate control systems .
The larger the firm , the more elaborate the systemneeded for control ; hence , the more complex its
administration. Older firms , particularly in older industries , develop
more elaborate relationships with more differentiatedand specialized administrative tasks.
The age of company and of an industry influencesorganizational structure.
The longer an organization has existed , the moreformalized its behavior is likely to be.
AGE AND SIZE
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
15/16
With age come standardization of systems and procedures.
The size of an organization influences its structure in severalways.
The size of a company influences the degree of formal
systems needed to control it. An organizations size also influences whether work will be
approximately departmental.
Management wants predictability across departments and
stability within them. TECHNOLOGY
Technology the most influential factor in a company , is thetotal accumulation of tools , system , and work methods usedcollectively to transform inputs into outputs.
AGE AND SIZE
-
8/22/2019 Report Sa Management
16/16
THE END
: )