report sa management

Upload: princezz-love-mantilla-borja

Post on 08-Aug-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    1/16

    BY GROUP 5

    MEMBERS:

    ALJUN SIKAT

    JENILYN SARDA

    MARIEL ANN MANTILLA

    KRISTINE MAE LANTACA

    SHIELA rivera

    FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STANDARDIZATION

    BUREAUCRATIC AND ORGANIC STRUCTURES

    BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURES

    ORGANIC STRUCTURESDESIGNING THE ORGANIZATION

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    2/16

    FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STANDARDIZATION

    Work can also be standardized by redefining the flow

    of operations.

    Technology often dictates workflow.

    FOR EXAMPLE:

    Assembly line system represents a sequential flow of

    operations.

    A tire cannot be installed on a new car before the

    wheel assembly is attached to an axle ; similarly ,

    brakes cannot be tested until the tires are in place.

    The sequential flow of operations dictates a standard

    pattern of work organization.

    FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STANDARDIZATION

    BY: ALJUN SIKAT

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    3/16

    Standardization may also result from managementpolicies and legal mandates ranging from safety

    procedures to equal opportunity laws.

    Laws and rules impose constraints and lead to internal

    policies and procedures to guide managementdecisions.

    Policies and procedures do not necessary impose

    constraints , but they do define preferred behavior.

    Laws and rules, policies and procedures tend tostandardize human effort.

    The stereotype of a standardized organization is

    bureaucracy in which jobs are formalized and workflow

    is prescribed.

    FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STANDARDIZATIONBY: ALJUN SIKAT

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    4/16

    BUREAUCRATIC AND ORGANIC STRUCTURES Formalized organizations, particularly in the public

    sector , tend to be labeled bureaucracies.

    BUREAUCRACYS FORM OF ORGANIZATION:

    Is one in which activities are rationally defined.

    Division of work is unambiguous

    Managerial authority is explicitly vested in

    individuals according to skills and responsibilitiesprescribed for their organizations.

    It implies a less rigorous division of labor in a less

    formal environment.

    BUREAUCRATIC AND ORGANIC STRUCTURES

    BY: JENNILYN T. SARDA

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    5/16

    The fundamental difference between

    bureaucratic and organic

    organizations is in the degree of

    formalization Organic implies a

    flexible entity , one full of life .

    Both stereotypes may be unrealistic.

    BUREAUCRATIC AND ORGANIC STRUCTURES

    BY: JENNILYN T. SARDA

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    6/16

    The German sociologist Max Webercoined the word Bureaucracy.

    he has been credited with creating an

    organization form that has DominatedWestern Civilization during the twentiethcentury , one of that is Flexible , Formal ,Coldly , Rational and Dehumanizing.

    he merely described and put a name inwhat he saw in European Organizationsat the turn of its century.

    BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURES

    BY : MARIEL ANN MANTILLA

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    7/16

    FIGURE 9.5 WEBERS IDEAL BUREAUCRACY

    Manager are careerprofessionals, not

    owners of units they

    manage.

    Jobs broken downinto simple , routine ,

    and well-defined

    tasks.

    Positions organizedin a hierarchy with

    a clear chain of

    command.

    Career Orientation

    Impersonality

    Division of Labor

    Bureaucracy should

    have

    Formal Rules and

    Regulations

    Authority Hierarchy

    Formal Selections

    Uniform application

    of rules and controls

    , not according to

    personalities.

    System of written

    rules and standard

    operating

    procedures.

    People selected for

    jobs based on technical

    qualifications.

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    8/16

    1. FIXED AND OFFICIAL JURISDICTIONS OF AUTHORITY Are governed by rules and regulations that fix decisions-

    making parameters , align specific duties , and strictly define

    command privileges.

    2. FIRMLY ESTABLISHED RATIONAL CHAINS OFCOMMAND

    Graded levels of authority are structured in an absolute

    hierarchy with a narrow span of control over subordinates.

    It is the positions that are defined , not the individuals whomeet defined criteria ; positions are not redefined to suit

    individuals characteristics.

    FIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN BUREAUCRACIES

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    9/16

    A CHAIN OF COMMAND Is the unbroken line of authority between the lowest and the

    highest positions in an organization.

    A SPAN OF CONTROL

    Is defined by the number of subordinates one managersupervises.

    3. QUANTIFIED AND THROUGHLY DOCUMENTEDINFORMATION

    Nearly everything is reduced to writing in bureaucracy:

    decisions and conferences are recorded , files are maintained ,and allocations are quantified , which creates complexadministration system.

    FIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN BUREAUCRACIES

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    10/16

    4. SUPPOSITION OF EXPERTISE Because positions are filled by individuals who have

    met defined criteria , it is assumed that people at each

    skill levels have expertise.

    5. ART OF MANAGEMENT

    Is recognized as important , managers of

    bureaucratic organizations rely on rules and

    procedures. A technically scientific management process , the

    bureaucracy is viewed as Inflexible , Formal , Coldly

    Rational , And Dehumanizing.

    FIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN BUREAUCRACIES

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    11/16

    ORGANIC STRUCTURES In the classic 1966 article The Coming Death of Bureaucracy ,

    theorist Warren Bennis heavily criticized bureaucracies and

    proposed that we create organic organizations.

    HIS OBSERVATIONS AND IDEAS: Our need for rational form of organization modeled on machine

    efficiency and explicit , inflexible lines of authority is outdated.

    Webers ideal of rational organization was a response to the

    irrational world of work of the Victorian age , whenemployees labored under capricious managers and subjective

    rules.

    Formalized organizations brought order and provided employees

    with protection.

    ORGANIC STRUCTURES

    BY: KRISTINE MAE LANTACA

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    12/16

    In contrast , Bennis believes todays world of rapidchange , complex technology , and diversified

    knowledge requires flexible patterns of organization.

    Bureaucracies are ill-adapted to the evolving

    management philosophy of humanistic values with

    democratic ideals.

    In place of bureaucracy , Bennis has proposed flexible

    organizations ; with executive as coordinates andemployees organized according to their personal skills.

    His article heralded the arrival of organizations based

    on groups of projects rather than of stratified authority.

    ORGANIC STRUCTURES

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    13/16

    CONTINGENCY THEORY AND ORGANIZATIONALSTRUCTURES

    Contingency theory implies that organizations must be

    capable of adapting to situations under various

    circumstances.

    Researchers have categorized factors into four basic

    concerns:

    1. The organizations age and size

    2. Its technology and that of the industry

    3. Environmental forces that influence decisions

    4. Power and personal attributes of the organizations

    management

    DESIGNING THE ORGANIZATION:

    BY : SHIELA

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    14/16

    Age and size of the organization usually define theneed for approximately elaborate control systems .

    The larger the firm , the more elaborate the systemneeded for control ; hence , the more complex its

    administration. Older firms , particularly in older industries , develop

    more elaborate relationships with more differentiatedand specialized administrative tasks.

    The age of company and of an industry influencesorganizational structure.

    The longer an organization has existed , the moreformalized its behavior is likely to be.

    AGE AND SIZE

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    15/16

    With age come standardization of systems and procedures.

    The size of an organization influences its structure in severalways.

    The size of a company influences the degree of formal

    systems needed to control it. An organizations size also influences whether work will be

    approximately departmental.

    Management wants predictability across departments and

    stability within them. TECHNOLOGY

    Technology the most influential factor in a company , is thetotal accumulation of tools , system , and work methods usedcollectively to transform inputs into outputs.

    AGE AND SIZE

  • 8/22/2019 Report Sa Management

    16/16

    THE END

    : )