research adminstration annual report - som - state of … planning and research, part ii, program...

Research Administration STATE PLANNING & RESEARCH PART II PROGRAM

FISCAL YEAR 2016

ANNUAL REPORT OCTOBER 1, 2015 — SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

www.michigan.gov/mdot

Field Services

TABLE OF CONTENTS

State Planning and Research (SPR), Part II, Program

Fiscal Year 2016 Annual Report

• Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1

• Summary ............................................................................................................ 1

• Program Milestones ............................................................................................ 2

• Fiscal Year 2016 Project Budget and Expenditure Summary Tables

o 80% Federally Funded Projects – Table 1 .................................................... 3

o Completed 80% Federally Funded Projects – Table 2 .................................. 5

o 100% Federally Funded Projects – Table 3 .................................................. 6

• Program Project Progress Reports (Sequentially Listed by Project Number)

o 80% Federally Funded Projects .................................................................... 8

o 100% Federally Funded Projects ................................................................ 62

STATE PLANNING AND RESEARCH, PART II, PROGRAM 2016 ANNUAL REPORT

Introduction The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Statewide Planning and Research (SPR), Part II, Program is authorized and funded through the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 420, Subpart B. This program is administered through the Research Administration Section in the Bureau of FieldServices. The program funds projects that have been initiated to address specific research needs atMDOT. SPR, Part II funding can be used to research and evaluate new technologies that relate to design,construction, maintenance and operation of all surface transportation modes. Other eligible uses includetechnology transfer and certain training activities.

Each year, MDOT develops a program consisting of 80 percent federally funded projects and 100 percent federally funded projects. The program also includes funding for various national research initiatives, such as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Technical Service Programs (TSPs), Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) and University Transportation Centers (UTCs). The program must be reviewed and approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Michigan Division Office prior to implementation. MDOT received FHWA approval on Aug. 12, 2015. This annual report covers the MDOT SPR, Part II, Program from Oct. 1, 2015, through Sept. 30, 2016.

Summary Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 research was conducted in the following focus areas, representing several modes of transportation and MDOT’s diverse business functions:

The FY 2016 SPR, Part II, Program consisted of 58 projects: 27 were 80 percent federally funded and 31 were 100 percent federally funded. The FY 2016 approved budget was $6,643,989.55 and expenditures totaled $5,448,292.71. Total project expenditures remained within the total project budgets as follows:

2016 Research Program Budget and Expenditures Program

Categories Total

Expenditures Total

Budget 80% Federal

$2,357,748.86 $3,956,457.40

100% Federal

$3,090,543.85 $4,909,718.00 Total $5,448,292.71 $8,866,175.40

Tables 1 and 2 summarize 80 percent federally funded projects that were funded in FY 2016 while the associated appendices contain one to two-page project summaries with projects listed sequentially by project number. Projects in Table 1 are listed in ascending order by job number. Table 2 provides a summary of 80 percent federally funded projects completed in FY 2016. Information is presented by focus area.

Program and Project Development • Bridges and Structures• Transportation Safety

Planning and Finance • Asset Management• Nonmotorized Planning and Development

Delivery and Operations • Intelligent Transportation Systems• Maintenance• Mobility, Systems and Signal Operations• Pavement and Materials

1

Table 3 summarizes 100 percent federally funded projects. The information is listed in ascending order by job number. The two University Transportation Center reports itemize the sources of funding in addition to the SPR II funds reported in Table 3. For additional information regarding a specific project, please contact Research Administration.

Program Milestones Research Administration and its stakeholders achieved the following significant milestones in FY 2016:

• Completed six 80 percent federally funded projects, with current and previous year expenditures ofabout $1.25 million, as summarized in Table 2.

• Project managers led research advisory panels and held meetings to guide and manage theprinciple investigator’s research.

• Published documents to transfer the results of research to practitioners, including the following:o Several Research Spotlights highlighting the value of individual research projects.o A fall newsletter highlighting MDOT’s involvement in national research programs.o A summary of Transportation Pooled Fund success stories.o An overview of innovative efforts in the department titled Innovation Snapshots.

• Planned new research projects for the 2017 program:o Solicited research ideas from MDOT staff in May 2016.o Problem statements were developed by project managers and approved by the Research

Executive Committee in July 2016.o Approved problem statements for FY 2017 were submitted to FHWA Michigan Division; in

the FY 2017 SPR, Part II, program.• Research Administration received FHWA approval of the proposed FY 2016 SPR, Part II, Program

on Aug. 12, 2015.

2

Project No.

FY 2016 Expenditures

Expenditures to Date Total Budget Project Manager Agency Principal

Investigator Title Start Date End Date Page No.

128592 $204,439.81 $528,759.20 $556,953.44 Kathrens, Rich MTU Brooks Wireless Data Collection and Retrievals of Bridge Inspection/Management Information 10/1/2013 2/28/2017 9

128593 $14,487.26 $232,425.68 $239,863.00 Polsdofer, Mark CTC Casey Research Administration Section Planning and Communications 1/31/2012 3/31/2016 11

128594 $109,727.24 $327,797.14 $487,877.09 Rogers, Corey WMU Aktan Research on Evalation and Standardization of Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) Techniques 10/1/2013 9/30/2017 13

128596 $130,620.27 $547,893.80 $551,176.40 Guerrazzi, Sam MTU Colling Bridge Design System Analysis and Modernization 11/1/2013 9/30/2019 15

128598 $27,855.72 $354,794.14 $354,794.14 Kahl, Steve UM El-TawilDevelopment, Characterization and Applications of

a Non Proprietary Ultra-High Performance Concrete for Highway Bridges

3/30/2013 3/14/2016 17

128599 $164,253.38 $389,125.07 $862,120.05 Chynoweth, Matthew LTU GraceEvaluating Long Term Capacity and Ductility of

Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer prestressing and post tensioning strands

10/1/2013 9/30/2018 19

128602 $34,851.61 $132,891.61 $427,549.00 Chynoweth, Matthew LTU Grace Statewide Overall Carbon Fiber Composite Cable Bridge Monitoring 10/1/2013 9/30/2020 21

128605 $42,738.34 $235,788.97 $267,320.33 McQuiston, Carissa WMU Van Houten Comparison of Alternative Pedestrian Crossing Treatments 10/1/2013 2/28/2017 22

128606 $210,019.00 $249,984.66 $250,000.00 Kanitz, Dean MSU GatesMichigan Urban Trunkline Segments Safety

Performance Fucntion (SPFs) Development and Support

8/16/2015 9/30/2016 23

128607 $530,060.00 $2,189,924.81 $3,200,000.00 Ajegba, Paul UM Peng Connected/Automated Vehicle and Infrastructure Research 10/1/2013 6/30/2017 25

128608 $171,558.24 $3,633,745.18 $3,763,712.65 Castle, Collin Mixon Hill Mixon Advanced Applications of IntelliDrive Data Use Analysis and Processing 2 (DUAP2) 8/9/2011 1/31/2017 27

128609 $35,242.85 $49,856.10 $54,857.00 Castle, Collin HNTB Morris Active Traffic Management (ATM) Technical Support 6/16/2015 4/15/2016 39

128611 $67,175.30 $181,475.96 $187,942.69 Howe, Melissa LTU Bandara Evaluating the use of Tow Plows 3/30/2013 9/30/2016 40

128612 $39,787.17 $180,213.37 $214,819.09 Grazioli, Mark LTU Bandara Performance Evaluation of Subgrade Stabilization with Recycled Materials 10/1/2013 1/31/2016 43

TABLE 1 - 80% FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS

3

Project No.

FY 2016 Expenditures

Expenditures to Date Total Budget Project Manager Agency Principal

Investigator Title Start Date End Date Page No.


128649 $47,127.56 $47,127.56 $166,857.00 Bramble, Mary Opus International Ceifetz Evaluation of Road Delineation Practices in

Michigan 10/1/2015 3/31/2017 44

128651 $28,422.20 $28,422.20 $321,355.45 Kanitz, Dean MSU Gates Michigan Rural Segments Safety Performance Function (SPFs) Development and Support 10/1/2015 9/30/2017 46

128652 $87,852.63 $87,852.63 $217,646.47 Lariviere, Kim WMU Kwigizile Association of Michigan’s Older Adult crashes with Roadway Features 10/1/2015 3/31/2018 47

129171 $49,655.94 $49,655.94 $443,124.41 Polsdofer, Mark CTC Casey Reseach Program Services 1/1/2016 9/30/2019 48

129657 $52,475.12 $52,475.12 $242,472.38 Cooper, Keith WSU Eamon Evaluation of Cost/Benefits of Standardization of Secondary Route Bridges 3/1/2016 3/31/2018 49

129666 $53,958.41 $53,958.41 $196,088.15 McMunn, Creightyn WSU Eamon Developing Representative Michigan Truck Configurations for Bridge Load Rating 3/1/2016 2/28/2018 50

129831 $15,381.30 $15,381.30 $164,202.47 Bott, Mark WMU Kwigizile Evaluating the Impacts of Speed Limit Increases on Identified Case Studies 3/1/2016 12/31/2017 51

129832 $0.00 $0.00 $308,825.00 Shaughnessy, Stephen MSU Gates

Assessment of Countermeasure Gaps, Predictive Grash Analysis and Engineering Safety Programs

in Michigan6/1/2016 2/28/2018 52

129889 $53,450.43 $53,450.43 $284,449.19 Belill, Talia Parsons Brinckerhoff Maier Development of 3D and 4D Bridge Models and

Plans 3/1/2016 3/31/2018 54

130572 $81,922.00 $81,922.00 $329,243.21 DeBruyn, Josh Toole Design Group Sanders

Development of Differential Criteria for Determining Appropriateness of “Side-path” Applications for

Bicycle Use6/1/2016 6/30/2018 55

130579 $38,525.31 $38,525.31 $256,414.66 Kremer, Angie Gannett Flemming Rensel Further Assessment of Quick Clearance Strategies -

Phase II 5/1/2016 9/30/2017 56

130975 $1,514.29 $1,514.29 $165,881.86 Whiteside, Larry WMU Oh An Evaluation of Michigan’s Continuous Count Station (CCS) Distribution 4/1/2016 4/30/2018 58

131064 $64,647.48 $64,647.48 $604,625.79 Cook, Steve MTU BrooksImplementation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

(UAVs) for Assessment of Transportation Infrastructure - Phase II

5/1/2016 5/31/2018 60

$2,357,748.86 $9,809,608.36 $15,120,170.92 TOTAL 80% FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS

4

TABLE 2 - RESEARCH PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

PROJECT AREANUMBER OF PROJECTS

TOTAL EXPENDITURES IN

PERCENTAGEProgram & Project DevelopmentBridges and Structures 1 31%Environment & Water Sources 0 0%Innovative Contracting 0 0%Real Estate & Permits 0 0%Transportation Safety 1 19%Rest Areas, Utilities, & Landscaping 0 0%Surveys & Automated Design 0 0%Work Force Development 0

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

$354,794.14$0.00$0.00$0.00

$249,984.66$0.00$0.00$0.00 0%

Subtotal 2 $604,778.80 51%Delivery & OperationsResearch Administration 1 $232,425.68 18%Construction 0 $0.00 0%Geotechnical & Foundation Design 0 $0.00 0%Intelligent Transportation Systems 1 $49,856.10 4%Fleet/Facility Management & Operations 0 $0.00 0%Maintenance 1 $181,475.96 14%Mobility, Systems, & Signal Operations 0 $0.00 0%Pavements & Materials 1 $180,213.37 14%Worker/Facility Safety & Security Emergency Management 0 $0.00 0%

Subtotal 4 $643,971.11 49%Multi-Modal TransportationAviation 0 $0.00 0%Freight & Logistics 0 $0.00 0%Freight Rail 0 $0.00 0%Intercity Bus 0 $0.00 0%Local Transit 0 $0.00 0%Maritime 0 $0.00 0%Passenger Rail 0 $0.00 0%Private/For Hire Passenger Carriers 0 $0.00 0%

Subtotal 0 $0.00 0%Planning & FinanceAsset Management 0 $0.00 0.00%Contract Administration 0 $0.00 0%Finance 0 $0.00 0%Non-Motorized Planning & Development 0 $0.00 0%Program Development 0 $0.00 0%Transportation Policy 0 $0.00 0%Travel Demand Forecasting 0 $0.00 0%

Subtotal 0 $0.00 0%TOTAL 6 $1,248,749.91 100%

5

Project No. Job No. FY 2016 Expenditures

Expenditures to Date Total Budget Agency Project Manager Title Start Date End Date Page

No.SPR1284

(007) 115024 $8,000.00 $32,000.00 $64,000.00 AASHTO Barondess, Margaret Environmental Technical Assistance Program (ETAP) 10/1/2010 9/30/2020 63

SPR1284 (019) 115193 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 AASHTO /

FHWA Clover, Andre AASHTO Engineering Technical Service Programs 10/1/2015 9/30/2016 65

TPF-5(176) N/A $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $70,000.00 FHWA Firman, Jason Development of a Transportation Systems Simulation Manual (TSSM): First Edition 6/1/2016 9/30/2017 66

TPF-5(206) N/A $50,000.00 $200,000.00 $250,000.00 Virginia DOT Smith, Matt

Research Program to Support the Research, Development, and Deployment

of System Operations Applications of Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII)

10/1/2012 12/31/2016 68

TPF-5(218) N/A $25,000.00 $175,000.00 $200,000.00 Minnesota DOT Droste, Justin Clear Roads Winter Highway

Operations Pooled Fund 10/1/2009 9/30/2017 70

TPF-5(231) 111159 $0.00 $175,000.00 $350,000.00 MDOT Biernbaum, Luke ITS Pooled Fund Program (ENTERPRISE) 10/1/2009 9/30/2019 73

TPF-5(237) N/A $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Missouri DOT Briseno, Alexandra Transportation Library Connectivityand Development 5/1/2011 9/30/2018 83

TPF-5(255) N/A $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $80,000.00 FHWA Shaughnessy, Steven Highway Safety Manual Implementation 11/9/2015 12/31/2019 87

TPF-5(267) N/A $660,000.00 $660,000.00 $990,000.00 Alabama DOT Bleech, Curtis Accelerated Performance Testing for the NCAT Pavement Test Track 4/15/2015 9/30/2017 88

TPF-5(269) N/A $0.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Minnesota DOT Krom, Ben

Development of an Improved Design Procedure for Unbonded

Concrete Overlays4/13/2012 5/31/2017 90

TPF-5(286) N/A $15,000.00 $60,000.00 $75,000.00 Iowa DOT Staton, John Next Generation Concrete Pavement Road Map 10/1/2012 9/30/2017 92

TPF-5(290) N/A $25,000.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 Iowa DOT Gustafson, Dawn Aurora Program 10/1/2013 9/30/2016 94

TPF-5(297) N/A $17,500.00 $52,500.00 $70,000.00 Oklahoma DOT Stallard, Tim Improving Specifications to Resist Frost

Damage in Modern Concrete Mixtures 10/1/2013 2/28/2017 96

TPF-5(308) 125276 $26,909.52 $27,008.17 $135,000.00 MDOT Curtis, Beckie The Use of Bridge Management Software in the Network Analysis of Big Bridges 10/1/2015 9/30/2017 98

TPF-5(313) N/A $12,000.00 $24,000.00 $60,000.00 Iowa DOT Staton, John Technology Transfer Concrete Consortium [Old TPF-5(159)] 10/1/2014 12/31/2019 100

TPF-5(319) N/A $25,000.00 $150,000.00 $175,000.00 FHWA Peplinski, SuzetteTransportation Management Center (TMC)

Pooled Fund Study[Old SPR-2(207)]

10/1/2014 9/30/2017 102

TPF-5(320) N/A $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $75,000.00 Indiana DOT Kennedy, Kevin Base Funding for the North Central Superpave Center 6/1/2015 9/30/2017 103


6

Project No. Job No. FY 2016 Expenditures

Expenditures to Date Total Budget Agency Project Manager Title Start Date End Date Page

No.


TPF-5(330) N/A $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Ohio DOT Howe, Melissa No Boundaries Roadway Maintenance Practices 9/1/2015 9/1/2018 104

TPF-5(342) N/A $180,741.00 $180,741.00 $181,766.00 FHWA Clover, AndreTRB Core Program ActivitiesPeriod Covering- FFY 2016

(TRB FY 2017)10/1/2015 9/30/2016 106

TPF-5(343) N/A $0.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 Washington DOT Torres, Carlos Roadside Safety and Research for MASH

Implementation 10/1/2016 9/30/2018 108

TPF-5(346) N/A $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $80,000.00 Minnesota DOT Lynwood, Lynn Regional Roadside Turfgrass

Performance Testing Program 3/25/2016 3/1/2019 110

TPF-5(347) N/A $33,952.37 $168,952.37 $218,952.00 South Dakota DOT Cook, Steve Development of Maintenance

Decision Support System 6/1/2012 9/30/2018 111

TPF-5(351) N/A $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $60,000.00 Kansas DOT Corlett, Paula Self de-icing LED signals 3/25/2016 9/30/2018 113

TPF-5(416) N/A $1,333,900.00 $1,333,900.00 $1,100,000.00 FHWA Clover, Andre National cooperative highway research program NCHRP for FY2016 10/1/2015 9/30/2016 114

TPF-5(TBD) N/A $0.00 $0.00 $90,000.00 TBD Filcek, Matt

Evaluation of 0.7 inch Diameter Carbon Fibe Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)

Pretensioning Strands inPrestressed Beams

10/1/2016 12/31/2019 116

OR15-517 N/A $256,500.00 $256,500.00 $500,000.00 AASHTO Fox, KevinAASHTOWare Project 3.01 Cooperative

Software Development Project (Field Manager)

10/1/2015 9/30/2017 117

OR15-525 N/A $0.00 $0.00 $11,500.00 MDOT Clover, Andre MDOT SPR-Part 2 Program Peer Exchange 7/1/2016 12/31/2016 119

126199 126199 $0.00 $162,000.00 $162,000.00 AASHTO Strzalka, Larry AASHTOWare Development Project - Project Bids Software (PBS) 10/1/2014 9/30/2016 120

126401 126401 $55,701.33 $80,454.54 $120,001.00 MSU Chelotti, ErinDevelopment of an Acceptance test for Chip Seal Projects: Highway Pavement

Preservataion UTC11/1/2014 1/31/2017 122

126721 126721 $45,698.70 $85,166.88 $99,997.35 MTU Johnson, NikkieNational University Rail Center for

Research, Education and Technology Transfer (NURails) UTC

1/1/2015 12/31/2016 124

129823 129823 $39,640.93 $39,640.93 $249,999.31 UMTRI McQuiston, Carissa Developing Michigan Pedestrian and Bycicle Safety Models UTC 3/30/2016 2/28/2018 126

$3,090,543.85 $4,302,863.89 $5,863,215.66 TOTAL 100% FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS

7

80% FEDERALLY

FUNDED PROJECTS

Sequentially Listed by Job Number

8

Michigan Department Of Transportation

5312 (2014)

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION MDOT RESEARCH PROJECT

ANNUAL REPORT - FISCAL YEAR 2016

PROJECT TITLE: Wireless Data Collection and Retrieval of Bridge Inspection/Management Information

FUNDING SOURCE: SPR, Part II OTHER (PLEASE EXPLAIN)

PROJECT MANAGER: Rich Kathrens CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0067 Z2 PROJECT START DATE 10/1/2013 PROJECT NO. 128592 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2015 OR NO. OR14-021 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 2/28/2017 RESEARCH AGENCY Michigan Technological University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Collin Brooks

BUDGET STATUS FY 2016 Budget Total Budget

Vendor Budget FY 2016 $185,000.00 Total Vendor Budget $541,497.90

MDOT Budget FY 2016 $20,000.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $15,455.54 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $200,783.81 Total Budget $556,953.44 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $3,656.00 Total Expenditures $528,759.20

Total Amount Available $28,194.24 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The overall goal is to help MDOT take advantage of the advances in portable data entry technologies, reduce the need for field staff time to collect bridge inspection data and thereby have a safer bridge inspection program, and provide a compatible path forward to a more efficient bridge inspection process that is available to all appropriate MDOT staff and managers.

Develop a wireless web/tables based bridge inspection data collection system. This system will use 2D and/or 3D models to help collect data and integrate with MDOT Michigan Bridge Reporting System and other current MDOT bridge inspection process and web applications.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The following tasks were completed during 2014: Task 1: Literature Search for ongoing and recently completed research (state-of-the-practice) which included a state-of-the-practice report identifying and evaluating existing commercial applications as well as developing research techniques. (Delivered to MDOT 2/15/2014) Task 2: Review MDOT’s existing (National Bridge Inventory) NBI and AASHTO Element data collection process which included coordination with MDOT bridge inspection management and field personnel to arrange for selected research staff to review the existing National and MDOT bridge inspection methods. Several meetings and workshops were completed on 12/17/2013, 2/25/2014, and 5/29/2014.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS A report was completed summarizing the evaluation of the current best practices and literature review for similar data collection methods. The project team met to several times to evaluate and document MDOT’s bridge inspection process. This information was used to develop a detailed list of software and project requirements for developing the data collection application. Through this interactive design process the project team created a data collection application using MDOT’s existing structure inventory and appraisal information and sophisticated gaming technology to generate 3D models of the structures that can be used to accurately collect quantity and location of bridge defects and deterioration.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Security protocol was reviewed and it has been determined that access to the data will use the existing MiBRIDGE security protocols. Development of 3DWBIS application for use on multiple platforms and devices has been completed. An information webpage was created to promote awareness of the project. Additional videos and coordination with AASHTO has been completed to promote future development and maintenance of the application from a national perspective. Development of "user" input of data to better define the 3D models and add the ability to collect NBI condition information to make this an all-inclusive bridge inspection field application was completed. Additional development was completed to collect linear defects and translate the quantity data in alignment with the AASHTO Element requirements.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Due to a major database upgrade the development for linking the data collected using the 3D application to MDOT’s bridge database, the project was extended. During 2017 the link will be developed to MDOT's Bridge Database and the 3D application data collection system to verify which tables and data needs to be stored in MDOT’s bridge database. The final report will be completed which will

9

included a detailed user manual and guidance for creating the required data fields in MDOT’s database to allow the application to be implemented.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) A one year extension to the end of FY 2016 was approved to finalize the 3D data collection system for use on all bridges within the state of Michigan. This will provide an advance tool for inspectors to accurately and efficiently collect the required AASHTO element level data per FHWA requirements. An additional extension was granted at the end of FY 2016 to document and develop the tables necessary for a future integration of the 3D Bridge Application due to MDOT’s major updates to the database. With this extension, the final $28,194.24 that was previously approved in the FY 2016 program is expected to be expended in FY 2017.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION (Required the last year of the project)

Project completion expected in fiscal year 2017.

10


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION SECTION PLANNING AND COMMUNICATIONS


PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Polsdofer

CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2012-0298 PROJECT START DATE 01/31/2012

PROJECT NO. 128593 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 03/31/2015

OR NO. OR12-021 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 3/31/2016

RESEARCH AGENCY CTC & Associates, LLC PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Patrick Casey


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $85,000.00 Total Vendor Budget $239,863.00 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $0.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $0.00

Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $14,487.26 Total Budget $239,863.00 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $232,425.68


1. Assist Research Administration with developing, designing, writing and editing of new or updated manuals, assorted newsletters and other communication materials.

2. Plan Research Summit Materials for interaction with Universities and private consultants.3. Produce newsletters outlining the results of research projects.4. Provide support as-needed for additional documentation, such as the development of the new Innovations Report.

FISCAL YEAR 2012 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1. Develop Communications of documents such as Research Spotlights and newsletters.2. Innovations Report.3. RAC Sweet 16 Poster produced to share population findings at TRB annual meeting.4. Annual Report.

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1. Develop Communications of documents such as At-A-Glance, Research Spotlights and other newsletters: Partially fulfilled

and ongoing.2. Research and Implementation Manual: Completed.3. Innovations Report: Partially fulfilled and ongoing.4. Annual Report: Completed.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1. Annual Report.2. Update Innovations Report.3. Develop Communications of documents such as At-A-Glance, Research Spotlights and other newsletters as directed

by Research Administration.4. Assist with May 2014 Research Summit.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1. Develop Communications of documents such as 2014 At-A-Glance, numerous Research Spotlights and a pooled fund

success story document: Partially fulfilled and ongoing.FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Created contract summary of work completed: 1. Newsletters: May 2012, July 2012, February 2013, July 2013, November 2013.2. Spotlight Summary Documents: Written and produced for 36 research projects.

Centers of Excellence One-Pagers: Written and produced for all 8 Centers of Excellence.3. Project Manager Training: CTC worked with Research Administration to plan and conduct two half-day training sessions

with MDOT project managers in preparation for the 2012 Research Summit. Agenda, handouts and other training materialswere developed.

4. Research Program Documents: 3 documents- Developing Research Projects for 2014 and 2015 (updated for 2016 to2017). Effective Research Management document. Call for Research Summary document.

5. At-A-Glance Reports: 5 reports produced.6. Innovations Report: 1 produced.

11

7. Research and Implementation Manual: CTC helped RA revise and finalize program manual by editing content, developingand implementing a template for presentation, updating charts and tables and compiling the final document with allappendices.

8. High-Value Research Summaries: CTC helped RA submit 5 high-value projects in 2012 by summarizing each project’sgoals and results and highlighting their potential implementation impact.

9. Success Stories Documents: 10 created between 2012 and 2015.10. RAC Sweet 16 Poster: produced to share again population findings at TRB Annual Meeting.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) At the end of FY 2012, there was a change in funding when it was determined that this contract was eligible for federal funding, which was followed by a staff change to the Research Manager that was effective 1/1/2013. As this is a contract for administrative and communication services, four time extensions were also granted as additional work items were assigned to CTC. These were approved on 5/27/2014, 10/16/2015, 7/14/2015, and 12/18/2015, moving the final end date into FY 2016.

12


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Research on Evaluation and Standardization of Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) Techniques


PROJECT MANAGER: Corey Rogers CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0069 Z4 PROJECT START DATE 10/1/2013 PROJECT NO. 128594 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2015 OR NO. OR14-019 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 9/30/2017 RESEARCH AGENCY Western Michigan University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Haluk Aktan


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $111,274.11 Total Vendor Budget $474,857.09 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $7,898.02 Adjusted MDOT Budget $13,020.00 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $109,727.24 Total Budget $487,877.09 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $327,797.14


The primary purpose of this research is to evaluate and standardize accelerated bridge construction by creating scoping guidelines through investigation of national best practices and implementation of a decision making matrix.

Objectives include: 1. Review the ABC activities in other states and monitor any current ABC projects taking place in Michigan at the time of this

project.2. Evaluate methods and describe risks of substructure construction and constructability issues for utilizing deep foundations

outside of existing pier/abutments and the use of precast footing elements and/or post tensioning systems for footing construction.

3. Evaluate the constructability issues associated with bridge slides and Self Propelled Modular Transports (SPMTs) and whatthe site conditions necessary to successfully move bridges

4. Evaluate the costs and describe risks associated with SPMT moves, bridge slides, and unique foundation construction compared to conventional construction. Incorporate impacts to traffic and lane rentals when determining cost to benefit ratios.

5. Identify additional design requirements for moves and slides such as additional deck reinforcement, jacking stiffeners, structural stability during moves, and construction tolerances for ABC vs. conventional construction. Consider the unique loading conditions created during ABC. Also, discuss geotechnical risk management strategies for the construction of specialized geotechnical work

The scope of work includes the following tasks: 1. State-of-the-Art and State-of-the-Practice Literature Review2. Scoping Guidelines for ABC Implementation with Focus on SPMT and Slides3. Methodologies for Design and Construction of Foundations for Replacement of Bridges While in Service4. Cost Analysis, Life Cycle Costs and Cost/Benefit Ratio of ABC:5. Reporting: including quarterly progress reports, an annual interim report, and a final report.6. Develop functional specifications and MI-ABCD software. The MI-ABCD software will help MDOT determine the most cost

effective feasible accelerated bridge construction technique or traditional construction technique to use on a proposed project. 7. Monitor MDOT’s Bridge slide operations and movement and recommend hydraulic slide technology.8. Develop and test targeted accelerated construction user awareness tools.

The following table shows SPR II and Bridge funding and expendatures for this project:

Funding Source FY 16 Expenditures

Total Expenditures Total Budget

SPR II $109,727.24 $327,797.14 $487,877.09 Bridge $0.00 $19,321.19 $19,997.85

13

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The state of the art literature review advanced with the review of several key documents. Draft scoping parameters have been defined to assist with a decision matrix. Preliminary cost estimating techniques have been outlined. Foundation design survey of other states has advanced and findings have been documented.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The ABC decision making framework was extended to include lateral slides and SPMTS’s. 2014 bridge slide monitoring and evaluation was completed. Constructability issues and costs of ABC compiled was included in the framework. The final report for scope tasks 1 to 5 is complete.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed Mi-ABCD platform with incorporation of SPMT and bridge slides. Conducted internal beta testing with guidance from MDOT RAP. Created methods and tools to assist in the user in completing the ABCD platform.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES Continue testing through MDOT Region Bridge Engineers and make adjustments to the platform as necessary. Conduct training for MDOT staff and Bridge Committee. Complete the Final Report.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) The budget was increased on 8/1/2014 using Non-SPR funds for a Slide In-place Bridge Construction (SIBC) Showcase report. On 10/13/2015, the budget, time, and scope of the project was increased to develop Mi-ABCD software, monitor bridge slides, and develop user awareness tools. Two years of additional research were approved


Project expected completion in fiscal year 2017.

14


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Bridge Design System Analysis and Modernization


PROJECT MANAGER: Sam Guerrazzi CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0506 PROJECT START DATE 11/1/2013 PROJECT NO. 128596 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 11/30/2015 OR NO. OR14-029 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 9/30/2019 RESEARCH AGENCY Michigan Technological University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Tim Colling


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $92,853.52 Total Vendor Budget $551,176.40 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $10,000.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $0.00 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $130,620.27 Total Budget $551,176.40 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $547,893.80


MDOT currently designs between 50 and 80 bridges a year using an in-house software tool called the Bridge Design System. The initial software was developed over 30 years ago in the Fortran programming language and it has been updated and improved to adapt to MDOT’s design process changes and AASHTO standards. However, the evolutionary nature of desk top operating systems and accompanying programming languages has put MDOT’s primary design tool at some risk. The bridge design calculations, procedures and methodology contained in the Bridge Design System must be documented and preserved, and the program must be modernized as needed to assure it will function on new operating systems and work integrally with third party programs. At the same time, existing bridge design calculations, processes, and procedures must be updated to meet AASHTO bridge design standards. The first steps in improving the software is an in depth analysis of the existing system to better understand its function followed by an alternative analysis evaluating various improvements.

Tasks include: • Reviewing and documenting the bridge design calculations, procedures, and methodology contained in the MDOT Bridge

Design System.• Performing a risk assessment of the current system.• Providing recommendations to modernize the system incorporating new efficiencies and/or other programming

improvements.• Executing appropriate recommendations.• Updating the user interface• Modernizing the code• Updating engineering calculations• Developing new enhancements.

The following table shows SPRI II and Bridge Design funding and expenditures for this project: Funding Source FY 16 Expenditures Total Expenditures Total Budget

SPR II – JN 128596 $130,620.27 $547,893.80 $551,176.40 Bridge Design $4,151.59 $4,151.59 $799,543.03

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The first year’s proposed activities included reviewing and documenting the bridge design calculations, procedures, and methodology contained in the MDOT Bridge Design System. The reviewing and documentation activities progressed throughout the year such that draft documentation formats were presented.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The project team finalized Interim Report’s 1 and 2 taking into account all comments. Other tasks completed include instituting source control and an integrated test environment, building an automated test suite, splitting code into modules, removing common blocks, changing to "Free" source form, and eliminating proprietary extensions. Identifying recommended modifications to the BDS source code is 90 percent complete.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

The Final Research Report was completed and submitted. Version one of the modified BDS source code was submitted to MDOT.

15

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES State Planning and Research funding for his project is almost all spent, so substantial research activities beyond completeing administrative requirements are not anticipated in 2017. Bridge design funded activities are anticipated in FY 2017. They include the following:

• Updating the user interface• Modernizing the code• Updating engineering calculations• Developing new enhancements.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) On 06/30/2015, the project was extended to allow sufficient time to initiate software improvements identified during the course of the project. This was followed by a modification to the scope, cost, and duration as approved on 5/17/2016 where work was added to allow additional phases including updating the user interface, modernizing the code, updating engineering calculations, and developing new enhancements. This additional work was funded by non-SPRII funding.

The budget and scope was also shifted on 09/19/2016 from a subcontractor to the prime contractor.


The modified BDS source code was submitted to MDOT for implementation in the fall of 2016. Project completion expected in fiscal year 2019.

16


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Development, Characterization and Applications of a Non Proprietary Ultra-High Performance Concrete for Highway Bridges


PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Kahl CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0068 Z1 PROJECT START DATE 3/30/2013 PROJECT NO. 128598 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 3/30/2015 OR NO. OR14-020 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 3/14/2016 RESEARCH AGENCY University of Michigan PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Sherif El-Tawil


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $46,668.78 Total Vendor Budget $343,053.21 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $0.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $11,740.93 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $27,855.72 Total Budget $354,794.14

MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $354,794.14 Total Amount Available $0.00

PURPOSE AND SCOPE Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) is a specially formulated concrete that is capable of achieving extremely high performance. When properly reinforced with steel fibers, the material is capable of achieving the following properties:

1. High compressive strength, approaching that of mild steel.2. High tensile strength, several times that of regular concrete.3. Pseudo-ductility, with tensile softening strains of up to an order of magnitude greater than that of regular concrete.4. Exceptional energy absorption prior to fracture.5. Extremely small crack widths, small enough to practically eliminate ingress of chlorides.6. Exceptional durability, primarily enabled by the very small crack widths and the extremely high packing density of the

material at the microstructure level.7. Self-consolidating properties, which simplify construction.8. Autogenous self-healing properties, enabled by small crack widths under service loads.

Recently, the primary commercially available UHPC on the US market was available through LaFarge and marketed as Ductal®. Ductal is a proprietary material that is much more expensive than regular concretes. Construction using Ductal and other similar materials available through European suppliers requires specially certified contractors and costly construction processes, such as pressure or heat treatment, which are impractical to achieve in the field. High material cost coupled with complicated and costly construction procedures have seriously delayed widespread adoption of UHPC in the US. An alternative UHPC developed at the University of Michigan (U of M), here termed np-UHPC for non-proprietary-UHPC, has the potential for removing all obstacles preventing widespread use of UHPC in the State of Michigan and in the US.

The study has 7 research objectives, each of which will be achieved in a specific project task as detailed in the next section: Objective 1: Survey and identify potential applications for np-UHPC, particularly for Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) and Precast Bridge Element Systems (PBES)

Objective 2: Investigate whether a family of new np-UHPC materials, with a range of compressive strengths ranging from 15 ksi to 30+ ksi, can be made using locally available components. Can the cost be made commensurate with performance and minimized through optimization? What classification scheme should be used?

Objective 3: Characterize the properties of the new family of np-UHPCs developed in this project, focusing on tensile strength, compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and durability by laboratory testing.

Objective 4: Selecting: 1) continuous bridge decks and 2) deck overlays as two promising applications of np-UHPC, conduct finite element simulations to evaluate potential, quantify the effect of using np-UHPC, and prepare for field demonstrations and proof-of concept testing.

Objective 5: Conduct limited field demonstration and lab tests to show proof-of-concept for the selected applications. Provide for a batch scale up test for MDOT staff to observe the batching, mixing, placement, curing, and sampling characteristics.

Objective 6: Develop design, operational, and maintenance guidance for the chosen applications.

Objective 7: Develop use guidance on np-UHPC with cost/benefit analysis procedures. 17

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Task 1 – Completed. Applications of UHPC: This task surveyed applications of np-UHPC, focusing in particular on Precast Bridge Element Systems (PBES). Task 2 – Completed. Identified Sources of Materials for np-UHPC: U of M identified both local and national suppliers, in that order of priority, making a concerted effort to avoid international suppliers. We anticipate that steel fiber suppliers may be the most problematic; however, we have already identified US companies that have the potential for supplying suitable fibers. As part of this task, a systematic optimization process that relies on feedback from test results was developed to change the amount of the various material components with the objective of reducing costs while maintaining a performance characteristic, e.g. either strength or ductility. Task 3 – About 30 percent complete. Material Performance and Characterization: U of M proposed classifying the performance of the new np-UHPC using a categorization scheme. The proposed limits can be adjusted depending on the test results and in conjunction with the MDOT project manager. For all classes, U of M is striving to ensure that the strain at peak tensile stress is greater than 0.3 percent. Such a value is important since steel bars yield at about 0.21 percent and implies that the new material is effective not only in service but up to and after yielding of the bars. Based on determinations made in Task 2, test results, in conjunction with other published results, are evaluated as they become available and used to direct our effort to reduce mix cost. The criteria U of M is using for performance evaluation are compressive strength, tensile strength and tensile strain at peak stress.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Tasks 1, 2, 3, listed above were completed, along with the following: Task 4 - Simulation Studies of np-UHPC Task 6 - Synthesis: develop design, operational, and maintenance guidance

The following tasks were partially completed: Task 5 - Field and Structural Testing approximately 75% complete Task 7 - Cost Benefit Guidance has just started.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Tasks 1-6 have been completed. Task 7 - Cost Benefit Guidance is ongoing. The final report has been started.


Final report issued. FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES

None. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))

A funded time extension was approved on 03/23/2015 to address unexpected finding in Task 5. Most of the remaining pull out tests have been concluded and the beam testing data has been processed. The extension consisted of conduct additional testing of beams and new pull out tests. Due to the experimental results in task 5 not matching with expectations, it was desired to confirm the bond and development length via additional pull out testing. This was important for design purposes. Because of the additional testing, the timeframe was extended to incorporate data analysis and reporting.


In summer 2016 a construction project demonstration was done to evaluate the ability to produce the UHPC mix in larger quantities for a closure pour of post a tensioned box beam structure. The mix failed in the scale up and was abandoned and replaced with the proprietary UHPC due to project time constraints. As a result, there is a need for a phase II project addressing scale up for batch processes (1/2 to 1 cyd) before the product can be implemented again.

18


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Evaluating Long Term Capacity and Ductility of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Prestressing and Post Tensioning Strands


PROJECT MANAGER: Matthew Chynoweth CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0065 Z2 PROJECT START DATE 10/1/2013 PROJECT NO. 128599 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2016 OR NO. OR14-024 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 9/30/2018 RESEARCH AGENCY Lawrence Technological University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Nabil Grace


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $272,979.11 Total Vendor Budget $851,814.05 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $9,620.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $10,306.00



Use of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) as longitudinal prestressing and transverse post tensioning is a viable alternative to the 270 ksi low relaxation steel strands currently used by MDOT’s prestressed and post tensioned bridge superstructures. CFRP strands are not subject to corrosion, and have strength characteristics similar to steel. MDOT has used CFRP transverse post tensioning on two structures and has projects planned for CFRP longitudinal prestressing. This is a material MDOT will be using on future projects as well.

The current AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications do not contain guidance on the design of elements using CFRP prestressing or post tensioning. ACI 440.1R-09 provides guidance on the jacking and final stresses in CFRP strands to stay within a desired ductility range, and also provides guidance on the initial elastic losses of the CFRP fibers and resin. CFRP strands lack the ductility of steel strands and therefore, allowable maximum stress values are recommended to ensure ductile behavior of the overall structure so the failure mode is similar to that of a steel strand structure.

ACI 440 discusses the creep rupture characteristics of CFRP strands but due to lack of good historical data, discussions of long term losses due to creep, concrete shrinkage, and effects of environmental factors are very general. Bond fatigue, bond lengths for splices, susceptibility to fire damage, and other severe exposure conditions are also not addressed due to the lack of long term testing data. Long term losses need to be taken into account during the initial design, as these values are subtracted from the ultimate capacity of the materials. AASHTO provides detailed methods and empirical equations for determining these losses in steel strands; however, no equivalent equations are available for CFRP strands. For current CFRP projects, detailed finite modeling has been performed to determine the performance of the materials. For CFRP strands to be used as a production design material, methodologies and empirical equations need to be developed to quantify these values and provide the designer with the guidance on how to properly apply these methodologies.

The long term losses and other environmental effect will also need to be known for load ratings of structures with CFRP elements.

A revision was made to the contract to include the overall design guidelines and specifications, with respect to flexural and shear design for concrete beams prestressed with CFRP strands. This research includes the design methodology in AASHTO LRFD format, specification development, and standard design template using the MathCAD software program.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Performed laboratory testing for creep rupture, bond fatigue, bond splice length, development length, lap lengths, anchorage testing, long-term relaxation testing, and long-term losses and creep testing. Evaluation of worldwide design guidelines completed along with documentation of deficiencies when compared to AASHTO requirements.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Continuation of creep rupture, bond fatigue, bond length, cold weather, fire chamber, and environmental testing occurred, along with dissemination of the results. As part of the analytical phase of the project, the Principal Investigator (PI) has proposed a modified prestressed flexural design methodology and a modified shear design methodology. The flexural methodology uses the concept of equivalent area of prestressing given the area of strand material. The PI assisted MDOT with the design of the CFCC prestressed bub-T M-86 over Prairie Creek bridge using this new methodology. The Research Advisory Panel also met with the PI twice during 2015 to observe laboratory testing and provide feedback on results to date.

19

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Continuation of all laboratory testing for creep rupture, bond fatigue, bond length cold weather effects, fire chamber effects, and environmental testing took place, along with load tests for several elements subject to the above testing. Work also advanced on the CFRP Prestressing Guidelines. Draft guidelines were submitted for MDOT review and comment, and two Research Advisory Panel meetings were held to review and provide guidance on additional activities.

During this time frame, MDOT also delivered a project in Southwest Region – M-86 over the Prairie Creek. This project consists of 104’ long, 42” deep bulb-T beams, prestressed with CFRP strands. Final design calculations from MDOT were submitted to LTU for review, and a finite element model analysis was performed to validate the design. Once beam fabrication began, LTU assisted with QA, and trouble shooting of beam fabrication issues. Finite models were prepared based on actual prestress force per strand to determine acceptability of beams. All beams were determined to be acceptable.

Work also progressed on validation of design of the I-75 SB over Sexton Kilfoil Drain, which consists of 140’ long, 60” deep bulb-T beams prestressed with CFRP strands. As part of the research project, LTU provided guidance on final design documents, along with providing a finite element model to validate the design.

These activities were done using the proposed design specification methodologies. FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES

In FY 2017, laboratory testing will continue, with a focus on the long term behavior of the CFRP materials.

MDOT will be performing the final design of two additional CFRP prestressed bridges – M-3 over I-94, and Brush Street over I-94 as part of the overall I-94 advanced bridges for the I-94 modernization mega-project. As part of the research project, design validation, and finite element model analyses will be prepared for both bridges.

It is also anticipated the draft final guide specification will be submitted for review, along with a final MathCAD design template. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))

A cost, duration, and scope change was approved 2/4/2014 in order to develop CFRP specifications in AASHTO LRFD format for the design of elements prestressed with CFRP. An additional cost, duration, and scope change was approved 9/22/2016 to allow additional work to include finite element analysis and MathCAD services for the deployment of three carbon fiber structures.



20


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Statewide Overall Carbon Fiber Composite Cable Bridge Monitoring


PROJECT MANAGER: Matthew Chynoweth CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2014-0043 PROJECT START DATE 10/01/2013 PROJECT NO. 128602 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2020 OR NO. OR14-039 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Lawrence Technological University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Nabil Grace




Carbon Fiber Composite Cable (CFCC), and other Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) materials are being used for prestressing applications in Michigan bridge rehabilitation and replacement projects. As this is still considered an innovative material, understanding and quantification of the long term behavior based on stress/strain gage readings of previous field deployments is essential for future design and construction considerations. Continued monitoring of the CFCC elements in already constructed bridges will provide information on the long term behavior, and allow for recommendations to be made for future designs, taking into account the behavior of current field deployments.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed the setup of the monitoring website and data are now available for review and download. The research team at Lawrence Technological University (LTU) was successful at downloading data from the website and recordings from Bridge Street bridge, M-50 bridge, and M-39 bridge have been checked. Readings from M-50 and M-39 bridges had minor issues that were corrected later on. The system was then working properly in both bridges and the readings conformed to the theoretical calculations. At the close of the Fiscal Year (FY), work was continuing on connecting M-102 bridge to the website and making the data available. As part of the nearly completed construction project, a power system is to be installed on-site. Scheduled maintenance visits to Bridge Street bridge and M-50 bridge were postponed until the necessary power system for M-102 is available.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Data from each bridge has been used for a separate research project, 2013-0065 - Evaluating Long Term Capacity and Ductility of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer prestressing and post tensioning strands. There have been pieces of data collection equipment and sensors that have been noted as not functioning properly, and a meeting with the supplier will take place in early 2016. In the meantime, data received is being used to corroborate analytical calculations and responses.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Monitoring of bridges containing CFRP elements continued throughout FY 2016. Several locations had equipment upgrades, along with assessments of the adequacy of the data collection equipment. Reports were provided of the trends in strains, loads, and deflections at different locations, and the data has been continued to be used in conjunction of research project 2013-0065 - Evaluating Long Term Capacity and Ductility of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer prestressing and post tensioning strands. The data analysis and trends from this monitoring continue to validate numerical simulation of bridge behavior being done as part of that research.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Monitoring of the current inventory of bridges will continue, and the Research Advisory Panel will ask for an additional bridge to be added to this monitoring project once complete. This will be the I-75 SB over Sexton Kilfoil Drain, which will be the longest CFRP prestressed beam bridge built to date, so strain and load data will be important to monitor. Monitoring activities will continue until project completion in 2020.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))

None. SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION (Required the last year of the project)

Expected project completion in fiscal year 2020.

21


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Comparison of Alternative Pedestrian Crossing Treatments


PROJECT MANAGER: Carissa McQuiston CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0069 Z2 PROJECT START DATE 10/1/2013 PROJECT NO. 128605 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 4/30/2015 OR NO. OR14-018 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 2/28/2017 RESEARCH AGENCY Western Michigan University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Ronald Van Houten




There is a need for low cost countermeasures to increase yielding to pedestrians at crosswalks on multilane roads with moderate to high Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Current treatments include the Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB), which costs around $20,000 per installation, and the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon that costs $100,000. The costs of these treatments limit their installation. The development of low cost alternatives is needed to improve pedestrian safety. Initial studies have demonstrated that street signs (R 1-6) used as a gateway treatment (three signs for each two lanes approach) can produce a yielding level comparable to those produced by a RRFB or Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon. On a typical two lane road the in-street sign could be located on the centerline and near the curb on each outside lane forming a "gateway." Other configurations could be developed for three or four lane roadways. This study will determine conditions where this treatment can be substituted for other treatments, or be used in conjunction with other devices. With the extension and budget addition, more urban data will be collected and the sites will be studied for a longer duration to test for survivability and the effect of speed.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 kicked off the project and discussion was generated around crossing locations to consider for the study. Different systems, such as Quick Kurb and Pexco City Post, have been obtained in respective colors to evaluate the potential of the systems based on different placements. Locations were determined, some preliminary observations were recorded, and evaluations of this information were considered. Due to the available coordination of the researcher and MDOT maintenance staff, permanent installations were not able to be performed so an extension was considered. Some of the systems were evaluated in temporary installation with promising results. Vehicle yielding rates for some of the crossing locations exceeded 90 percent.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Gateway signs/City Posts were installed at agreed upon locations in Ann Arbor, Benton Harbor, Kalamazoo, and Marshall. The Western Michigan University (WMU) team collected yield compliance data at each site during the period of installation. A press release by MDOT highlighting these installations was sent out. Meetings with the research team were held to keep the project on task. Initial findings and data were presented at various conferences.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Baseline yielding and speed data has been collected at all sites, including the Ann Arbor sites that were added as part of the 2016 project extension. Installation and data collection has been successful and site removals will occur in November. The draft final report and draft User Guide were submitted for review.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES The final documents will be delivered, including: The Final Report, Final Report Part 2 with Ann Arbor speed and survivability data included, and a Final User Guide.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) The project was extended to 1/31/16 as approved 2/24/2015, allowing more time for MDOT to install pedestrian gateways and collect installation performance data. There was an additional cost, scope, and duration change approved 2/1/2016 to allow a larger sample size which will ensure all types of treatments were represented in previous installations.



22


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Michigan Urban Trunkline Segments Safety Performance Function (SPFs) Development and Support


PROJECT MANAGER: Dean Kanitz CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0066 Z6 PROJECT START DATE 3/1/2014 PROJECT NO. 128606 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 2/28/2016 OR NO. OR14-026b COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 9/30/2016 RESEARCH AGENCY Michigan State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Timothy Gates


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $101,344.24 Total Vendor Budget $250,000.00 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $0.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $0.00


Total Amount Available $15.34 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

To have full functionality of the Highway Safety Manual for Michigan, there is a need to develop safety performance functions (SPFs) tailored to urban segment facilities. SPFs will allow transportation professionals at all levels the ability to scientifically evaluate facilities prior to design for the expected number of crashes, crash severities, crash types ,and return on investment from a safety perspective. The scope of work includes the following:

1. Literature Review2. Identification of Sites3. Data Collection4. Data Analysis5. SPF Development6. Develop Maintenance Cycle7. Develop Maintenance Process8. Develop Deliverables9. Demonstration materials and meetings

Types of urban segment facilities to be evaluated are: 1. Urban Trunkline Two-Lane 55 mph;2. Urban Trunkline Two-Lane <55 mph;3. Urban Trunkline Three-Lane Arterial (w/TWLTL)4. Urban Trunkline Four-Lane Undivided5. Urban Trunkline Four-Lane Divided6. Urban Trunkline Five-Lane (w/TWLTL)7. Urban Trunkline Eight-Lane Divided8. Urban Trunkline Six-Lane Divided9. Urban Trunkline One-Way


Task 1: The literature review and identification of sites has been completed. The data collection and analysis were begun. FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Task 2 complete. The database of segments was compiled and is under review prior to being considered for regionalized analysis. Data attributes are being pulled from various sources while some apparent locations have some SPF development ongoing.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS All Tasks have now been completed for this effort. Task 3: Data Collection Task 4: Data Analysis Task 5: SPF Development Task 6: Develop Maintenance Cycle Task 7: Develop Maintenance Process Task 8: Develop Deliverables Task 9: Demonstration Materials

23

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) This contract was transferred from Wayne State University to Michigan State University. A duration change approved 7/19/2016. Due to contracting delays for the transfer from one institution to another, there was a need to extend the contract to complete the work. This effort would not have effectively been completed or been completed in the relative time frame if it would have been required to remain with the original institution. The level of work with this effort was consistent with the former Urban Intersections SPF development and support, which adds to the usability and consistency of the research implementation.


The SPF spreadsheet tool will be posted to the web and results from the effort will be implemented into IHSDM and AASHTOWare Safety Analyst.

24


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Connected Vehicle and Transportation Technology Research


PROJECT MANAGER: Paul Ajegba

CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2014-0006 PROJECT START DATE 10/1/2013 PROJECT NO. 128607 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2015 OR NO. OR14-053 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 6/30/2017 RESEARCH AGENCY University of Michigan PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Huei Peng


Vendor Budget FY 2016 (Revised) $975,100.00 Total Vendor Budget $3,000,000.00 MDOT Budget FY 2016 (Revised) $10,000.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $200,000.00 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $530,060.00 Total Budget $3,200,000.00 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $2,189,924.81

Total Amount Available $1,010,075.19 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

To construct a research test bed to investigate and evaluate technologies related to the interfacing of roadway infrastructure (including smart and connected technologies) and roadway vehicles (connected and automated vehicles). The safe operation of connected and automated vehicles requires technological advances in roadway infrastructure including, but not limited to, roadside communication equipment for connected vehicles, road weather information system (RWIS) technologies, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) infrastructure, pavement delineation devices (reflectors, pavement markings, freeway lighting), sign supports, signs (dynamic and static) and intersection treatments (traffic signals, pedestrian signals/signing). Knowledge gained from research performed at this newly constructed UM Mobility Transformation Facility (Test Track) will help MDOT improve safety, mobility and efficiency of the public roadway system by accommodating and implementing connected and automated vehicle technologies.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS A construction project was awarded to Angelo Lafrate Construction Company. The anticipated completion of construction is on November 14, 2014.

Progress- To- Date: 1) UMTRI tours of the construction site were performed on September 10-12 for the 21st ITS World Congress held in Detroit,

Michigan.2) Detention Ponds 100% complete.3) 95% completion of the storm sewer installations.4) Approximately 95% completion of the mass earthwork balancing.5) Began installation of the MSE wall along the creek on the south end of the job site.6) Began electrical power supply installation with DTE coordination.

*Project payments are based on Milestones.Since no milestone was100 complete by September 30, 2014, no payments were made during Fiscal Year (FY) 2014.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS On July 20, 2015, UM/UMTRI held a very successful Open House at the newly constructed M-City/Test Track. The facility was open to the public during the evening hours the week of July 20th.

Completed both Milestones # 2 and #3 [Parts B & C respectively].

Both Milestones #4 and # 5 were near completion as of September 30, 2015.

Design consultant will prepare a set of as-constructed plans for delivery to MDOT by first quarter of FY 2016 [Oct/Nov. 2015]. FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

• Completed Milestone 5 with the turn in of an MDOT approved set of as-constructed plans.• Completed traffic signal installations on April 21, 2016 [Milestone 4 task].• Majority of fiber optics installation completed by FYE [Milestone 4 task].• Traffic Control Lab installation completion is anticipated for 01/31/17 [Milestone 4 task].

25

• DSRC infrastructure installations (v3.2) partially completed by 9/30/16. Remainder of the installations plannedcompletion by 12/31/16 [Milestone 4 task].

• Held initial meeting with UM MTC/UMTRI directors and MDOT technical experts to discuss MDOT’s research interestalong with the analyses, evaluations, and testing to occur under Milestone 6.

• Start development of the Milestone 6 work plan. PI out for a while near FYE 2016. Still under development.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES

• Schedule meetings with MTC/UMTRI directors/researchers to complete Milestone 6 work plan and to monitor/track workprogress.

• Complete Milestone 6 work plan.• Complete fiber optics installation.• Complete traffic Control Lab installation.• Complete remainder of the DSRC infrastructure installations.• Plan and develop the project final report.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) The project completion date was extended to June 30, 2017 to match the University’s funding commitment time line and allow extra time to plan and develop the project final report. There was also a PI change approved 1/4/2016.



26


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Advanced Applications of IntelliDrive Data Use Analysis and Processing 2 (DUAP 2)


PROJECT MANAGER: Collin Castle CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2011-0316 PROJECT START DATE 8/9/2011 PROJECT NO. 128608 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 6/30/2014 OR NO. OR10-044 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 1/31/2017 RESEARCH AGENCY Mixon Hill of Michigan, Inc. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Lee Mixon

PROJECT BUDGET STATUS FY 2016 SPR II Budget/Expenditures Total Project Budget/Expenditures

Vendor FY 2016 Budget $175,000.00 Total Vendor Budget $3,687,062.65 MDOT FY 2016 Budget $5,000.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $76,650.00 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $171,558.24 Total Budget $3,763,712.65 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $3,633,745.18


To support MDOT and its partners in the evaluation of the uses and benefits of vehicle-related data. Evaluate and determine how the connected vehicle program will impact how state and local departments of transportation, specifically MDOT, do business as a result of the significant quantity of additional data collected on all major (and eventually minor) roads. This information is anticipated to permit MDOT and MDOT’s partners to more efficiently and effectively manage traffic on all facilities in the region, manage assets and road conditions, and respond to safety concerns.

The following table shows SPR II and ITS funding and expendatures for this project: Funding Source FY 16 Expenditures Total Expenditures Total Budget

SPR II - JN 128608 $171,558.24 $3,633,745.18 $3,687,062.86 ITS - JN 111941 $35,411.81 $190,968.14 $194,191.51

Wx-TINFO - JN 122184 $1,728.00 $403,115.53 $403,504.29 IMO 3 - JN 125655 $270,982.81 $479,624.00 $498,621.36

ITS – JN 121588 $241,907.59 $241,907.59 $252,058.01 ITS – JN 113517 $314,171.21 $314,171.21 $394,973.40 ITS – JN 113523 $39,022.97 $39,022.97 $249,987.20 ITS – JN 126918 $504,005.70 $504,005.70 $1,499,977.53

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS This program consists of the original contract and four amendments over the period of performance. The original contract and each amendment has had one or more job numbers associated. This annual report has organized the tasks providing the job numbers and their associated deliverables. All tasks and job numbers that have been completed are designated as such. All technical document deliverables and the draft Final Report / Executive Summary are to be due 04/30/2017. A three month (90 day) period will be provided for soliciting leadership feedback and making revisions that will then be submitted as final by 07/31/2017.

This report shows status by year, during the year, as Completed or In Progress. 2016 shows the current status of all tasks.

Task 1: Concept Review and Refinement JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Revised DUAP ConOps - In Progresso List of Prototype Applications - In Progresso Meeting Notes - In Progress

Conducted ongoing research for development of white papers on applicationso Discussed with Subject Matter Expert (SME) areas where data sharing can bring the most benefit to MDOTo Created modular-based domain diagrams based on SME input to communicate application ideas with SMEs

Evaluated tentative application white papers

27

Task 2: User Needs Development JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Revised ConOps – In Progress Developed process to normalize the functions across regions and central office Conducted user meetings in Lansing, MI with SME; prepared meeting minutes for the meetings

o Dec. 12 – SMEs from Asset Management/Planningo Dec. 12 – SMEs from Maintenanceo Dec. 13 – SMEs from Constructiono Dec. 13 – SMEs from Operationso Feb. 28 – SMEs from Designo Feb. 28 – SMEs from Asset Managemento Mar. 1 – SMEs from Metro Region to discuss Performance Management and MAP-21o Jul. 11 – Meeting with Bob Millero Jul. 11 – Meeting with E-Constructiono Jul. 12 – Meeting with MDOT’s Metro Region engineerso Jul. 12 – Meeting with Tony Kratofil regarding Performance Based Operating System (PBOS)o Jul. 12 – Meeting with OPUS regarding PBOSo Aug. 29 – Meeting with University of Michigan – Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI) in Ann Arbor, MI

Began documenting user needs that will supplement application white papers Concept of Operations

Task 3: Design and Development JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o System Architecture - In Progresso System Requirements - In Progresso System Design – In Progress

System Requirements Specification (SRS)o Developed first draft DUAP system requirements

• Began drafting requirements for user interface of the DUAP system• Drafted requirements for USDOT Safety Pilot Model Deployment data ingestion• Drafted requirements for USDOT Integrated Mobile Observation (IMO 2.0) data ingestion• Drafted DUAP system ingestion requirements

System Architecture Description (SAD)o Developed first draft of system architecture description

• Drafted generic ingestion architecture for DUAP system• Drafted generic data management architecture for DUAP system• Drafted generic consumption architecture for DUAP system• Drafted hardware architecture for DUAP system

System Design Description (SDD)o Developed first draft SDD document

• Began drafting the ingestion operation under software design• Designed Safety Pilot data ingestion• Designed IMO 2.0 data ingestion• Designed generic data ingestion• Draft the hardware design

Designed and developed ingestion for data sourceso Designed and developed ingestion for USDOT Safety Pilot Model Deployment (Safety Pilot) datao Developed preliminary design for ingestion of IMO 2.0 data and vehicle tracking

Designed and developed map-based application for displaying Safety Pilot and IMO 2.0 dataTask 4: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation

JN111941 (Original) - In Progresso System Test Plan – In Progresso Field Operational Test Plan – In Progresso Field Operational Test Report – In Progresso Data and Interface Specification – In Progress

Implemented ingestion of data sources for the DUAP systemo Implemented ingestion of Safety Pilot datao Implemented ingestion of IMO 2.0 data

Implemented map-based application for displaying Safety Pilot and IMO 2.0 data Tested map-based application for displaying Safety Pilot and IMO data Evaluated performance of maps for use in map-based application Evaluated currently available hardware, software, operating systems and database systems for the DUAP system

o Evaluated telecommunications requirements for DUAP systemo Evaluated current state of the practice for computing platform

Evaluated currently available mapping software for supporting DUAP applications Evaluated mapping tools, frameworks, and projections used for displaying data

Task 5: Procure and Deploy Data Sources JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Data Collection Plan – In Progresso Demonstrate Applications – In Progress

28

Began integrating existing MDOT maps and data sources into DUAP systemo Discussed integrating Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) Software datao Discussed integrating MiDrive data

Collected and processed Safety Pilot data Collected and processed IMO data Collected and processed original Chrysler fleet data

Task 6: Data Management and Distributions Design JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Prototype System – In Progress Monitored and maintained data from Safety Pilot Model Deployment Monitored and maintained data from IMO 2.0 Monitored and maintained data from Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) fleet

Task 7: Data Collection Method, Comparison and Exploration JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Comparison of DUAP 2 & Current Data Collection Policies - In Progresso Specification of needs and evaluation success criteria for each application of interest - In Progress

Evaluated and analyzed Safety Pilot data Evaluated and analyzed IMO 2.0 data

Task 8: Application Convergence and Sustained Operations JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Training Materials – In Progresso Application procedures – In Progresso System Evaluation & Operations – In Progresso Final Report – In Progresso Implementation Plan – In Progress

No activity in this reporting periodTask 9: Outreach and Awareness

JN121364 (Original) - In Progresso Presentation Materials - In Progresso Research Papers - In Progress

Prepared for 2014 ITS World Congress in Detroit, MI Developed concepts for socializing project data among potential user groups Encouraged SMEs to collaborate with other MDOT personnel to identify areas to share data Prepared outreach and awareness materials as needed

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Task 1: Concept Review and Refinement

JN111941 (Original) – In Progresso Revised DUAP ConOps - In Progresso List of Prototype Applications - In Progresso Meeting Notes - In Progress

Conducted ongoing research for development of white papers on applicationso Discussed with SMEs areas where data sharing can bring the most benefit to MDOT

Evaluated tentative application white paperso Pavement applicationo Data capture through mobile deviceo Work flow developmento Traffic application

Completed Application White Paper #1 Completed Application White Paper #2 Completed Application White Paper #3 Completed Application White Paper #4

Task 2: User Needs Development JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Revised ConOps – In Progress JN122184 (WxTINFO) – In Progress

o ConOps supplemental - Completed Conducted user meetings with SMEs as necessary for gathering user needs Concept of Operations

o Published DUAP 2 Concept of OperationsTask 3: Design and Development

JN111941 (Original) - In Progresso System Architecture - In Progresso System Requirements - In Progresso System Design – In Progress

JN122184 (WxTINFO) – In Progresso Document the system - Completed

System Requirements Specification (SRS)o Completed DUAP system requirements

Completed System Architecture Description (SAD)29

System Design Descriptiono Designed functional operation for the DUAP systemo Designed hardware needs and hardware integration for the DUAP systemo Designed monitoring operations for the DUAP system

Developed DUAP system applications as identified Developed user interface for interfacing with the DUAP system and the system applications

Task 4: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o System Test Plan – In Progresso Field Operational Test Plan – In Progresso Field Operational Test Report – In Progresso Data and Interface Specification – In Progress

JN122184 (WxTINFO) – In Progresso Implemented systems - Completed

Implemented components of the DUAP system Implemented DUAP system applications as identified Implemented user interface capabilities for enabling users to interfacing with the DUAP system and the system

applications Tested components of the DUAP system Tested DUAP system applications for satisfying user needs Tested user interface capabilities for displaying the correct information to system users Evaluated DUAP system components for correct operation Evaluated DUAP system applications, as determined necessary Evaluated user interface capabilities for displaying the correct information to system users Created System Test Plan (STP)

o Developed Final DUAP STP document Created Field Operational Test Plan (FOTP)

o Developed Final DUAP FOTP documentTask 5: Procure and Deploy Data Sources

JN111941 (Original) - In Progresso Data Collection Plan – In Progresso Demonstrate Applications – In Progress

Continued to procure data sources for integration into the DUAP systemo Integrated existing MDOT data sources into the DUAP system, as identifiedo Integrated other data sources into the DUAP system, as identified

Created Data Collection Plan (DCP)o Developed final DUAP DCP document

Created DUAP system Procurement Specificationo Develop final DUAP Procurement Specification document

Created Configuration Management Plan (CMP)o Developed final DUAP CMP document

Task 6: Data Management and Distributions Design JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Prototype System – In Progress Deployed prototype system Continued collecting data for the DUAP system

o Continued collecting Safety Pilot data for the DUAP systemo Continued collecting IMO data for the DUAP system

Task 7: Data Collection Method Comparison and Exploration JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Comparison of DUAP 2 & Current Data Collection Policies - In Progresso Specification of needs and evaluation success criteria for each application of interest - In Progress

Developed Application Data Needs and Evaluation Criteria Developed White Paper on Comparison of DUAP 2 and Current Data Collection Practices

Task 8: Application Convergence and Sustained Operations JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o Training Materials – In Progresso Application procedures – In Progresso System Evaluation & Operations – In Progresso Final Report – In Progresso Implementation Plan – In Progress

Developed Operational Policies and Procedures Developed Application User Manual Developed Application Training Material

Task 9: Outreach and Awareness JN121364 (Original) - In Progress

o Presentation Materials - In Progresso Research Papers - In Progress

Prepared for 2014 ITS World Congress in Detroit, MI

30

Developed concepts for socializing project data among potential user groups Prepared outreach and awareness materials as needed


JN111941 (Original) - Completedo Revised DUAP ConOps - Completedo List of Prototype Applications - Completedo Meeting Notes - Completed

No activities in this reporting periodTask 2: User Needs Development

JN111941 (Original) - Completedo Revised ConOps - Completed

No activities in this reporting periodTask 2.5: Wx-TINFO Requirements Development

JN122184 (WxTINFO) – Completedo ConOps supplemental - Completed

No activities in this reporting periodTask 2.6: User Needs Development

JN125655 (Amend 2) - In Progresso ConOps supplemental – In Progresso System Requirements - In Progresso System Architecture supplemental – In Progresso System Design supplemental - In Progress

Evaluated pavement analysis needs Evaluated J2735 data usage integration within DUAP

Task 3: Design and Development JN111941 (Original) - Completed

o System Architecture - Completedo System Requirements - Completedo System Design - Completed

No activities in this reporting periodTask 3.5: Design and Development

JN122184 (WxTINFO) - Completedo Document the system - Completed

No activities in this reporting periodTask 3.6: Design and Development

JN125655 (Amend 2) - In Progresso Deploy new system features - In Progress

Modified DUAP infrastructure for additional system configurability Continued incorporating road segment data Continued developing pavement analysis processes Incorporated connected vehicle data visualization

Task 4: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation JN111941 (Original) - In Progress

o System Test Plan – Completedo Field Operational Test Plan – Completedo Field Operational Test Report – Completedo Data and Interface Specification – Completed

Continued implementation and testing of IMO componentso Reported receipt of bad IMO files to UMTRI (missing lat/longs, speed, and header field information from some

vehicles)o Reported to UMTRI that no IMO .csv files were being receivedo Reported to UMTRI that no IMO files were being receivedo Collected feedback from MDTO users as they begin n to use DUAP (questions, comments, issues and enhancement

opportunities) Worked on data archiving and purging processes

Task 4.5: Wx-TINFO System Testing JN122184 (WxTINFO) - Completed

o Implemented systems - Completed Implemented and tested weather data source components

o Evaluation and further development of weather alerts and polygons• Created additional summarized views of polygons• Incorporating priority levels of weather events• Adjusted weather decision algorithms based on MDOT feedback

Continued to develop and implement DUAP application functionalityo Continued work with radar files and alertso Continued work to assure stability and security of systemo Continued work on further data analysis for use in reports

31

o Configuration Management for VIDAS• Testing for configuration updates• Testing for software updates

o Asset condition analysis Incorporated DMS information Incorporated AVL data Working with stakeholders to help understand weather event and alert challenges and differences between ATMS

operators and other functional area needsTask 4.6: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation

JN125655 (Amend 2) - In Progress Continued to implement and test weather data source components

o Evaluation and further development of weather alerts and polygonso Modified process pulling NWS data due to NWS changes

Continued to develop and implement DUAP application functionalityo Continued work to assure stability and security of systemo Continued work on further data analysis for use in reportso Asset condition analysiso Continued working on user login/roles

• For continued security enhancements• For functional area focus• User profiles

Collected feedback from MDOT users as they begin to use DUAP (questions, comments, issues and enhancement opportunities)

Worked with stakeholders to help understand weather event and alert challenges and differences between ATMSoperators and other functional area needs

Worked on integration of road segmentso Relating data to road segmentso Reporting information based on road segmentso Continue work on interface to integrate with base VIDAS system

Continued working on ingestion of DSRC data sources Incorporated functionality to display vehicle movements from DSRC data sources

Task 5: Procure and Deploy Data Sources JN111941 (Original) - Completed

o Data Collection Plan – Completedo Demonstrate Applications – Completed

Continued collecting Safety Pilot data for inclusion in DUAP Continued collecting and processing Integrated Mobile Observations (IMO) data Continued collecting and processing weather data sources Continued work on MVDS data source

o Completed process for ingesting datao Continued work to identify and implement other MVDS data feeds for inclusion in DUAPo Worked with DTMB to continue data retrieval due to issues with the data source

Continued work to incorporate VIDAS data for inclusion in DUAP Continued work to secure interface and data for GPS/AVL project

o Received balance of requested historical fileso Capturing current files (“intraday”) from ftp site

Worked to include DMS information Began work to include CCTV image files Coordinated with USDOT’s Southeast Michigan Test Bed and data sources, as necessary

Task 5.6: Procure and Deploy Data Sources JN125655 (Amend 2) - In Progress

o Deploy operational system – In Progress Continued collecting Safety Pilot data for inclusion in DUAP Continued collecting and processing of IMO data Continued collecting and processing weather data sources Continued collecting and processing MVDS data source

o Reviewed additional MVDS data files for inclusion into DUAP Continued collecting and processing VIDAS data Continued collecting and processing GPS/AVL data Continued collecting and processing DMS information Continued processing CCTV image files Worked with USDOT’s Southeast Michigan Test Bed and data sources, as necessary Continued work on archiving and data purging processes

Task 6: Data Management and Distributions Design JN111941 (Original) - Completed

o Prototype System - Completed Monitored and maintained all data sources for use in DUAP on backend servers

o Safety Pilot data for use in DUAPo IMO

32

o Weathero MVDSo VIDASo DMSo GPS/AVL

• Receiving current “intraday” files• Received balance of historical files• Need 24-hour files

Worked with USDOT’s Southeast Michigan Test Bed and data sources, as necessaryTask 6.6: Data Management and Distributions Design

JN125655 (Amend 2) - Completedo Final Report supplemental – In Progress

Monitored and maintained data sources on backend serverso Safety Pilot data for use in DUAPo IMOo Weathero MVDSo VIDASo GPS/AVL (intraday files, 24 hour files, and images)o DMS

Worked with USDOT’s Southeast Michigan Test Bed and data sources, as necessary Worked with data source contacts concerning issues with data availability

Task 7: Data Collection Method Comparison and Exploration JN111941 (Original) - Completed

o Comparison of DUAP 2 & Current Data Collection Policies - Completedo Specification of needs and evaluation success criteria for each application of interest - Completed

Evaluated and analyzed all data sources for use in DUAPo Safety Pilot data for use in DUAPo IMOo Weathero MVDSo VIDASo GPS/AVL

Worked with USDOT’s Southeast Michigan Test Bed and data sources, as necessaryo Continued to attend weekly V-I Test Bed Interoperability meetings

Task 8: Application Convergence and Sustained Operations JN111941 (Original) - Completed

o Training Materials – Completedo Application procedures – Completedo System Evaluation & Operations – Completedo Final Report – Completedo Implementation Plan – Completed

Documenting DUAP applications for future use Continued analyzing the sustained functionality of the system Continued analyzing data from data sources

Task 8.6: Application Convergence and Sustained Operations JN125655 (Amend 2) - Completed No activities in this reporting period

Task 9: Outreach and Awareness JN121364 (Original) - Completed

o Presentation Materials - Completedo Research Papers - Completed

Prepared slide presentation for Steve Cook’s use Prepared outreach and awareness materials as needed Prepared for and participated in Wx-TINFO Update/Feedback/Future Plans meetings Discussion of future application implementation with SMEs


No activities in this period [Completed]Task 2: User Needs Development [Completed]

Updated System Architecture [Completed] System Requirements Specification [Completed] System Design Documents [Completed] Conducted User Meetings with SMEs as needed

Task 2.5: WxTINFO Requirements Development No activities in this period

33

Task 2.6: User Needs Development JN125655 (Amend 2) - Completed

o ConOps supplemental – Completedo System Requirements - Completedo System Architecture supplemental – Completedo System Design supplemental - Completed

Continued refining pavement analysis needs Began analyzing user needs for road segments

Task 2.7: User Needs Development JN122588 (Amend 3) - In Progress Completed Gathering of user needs for LCAR ingestion and consumption Gathered additional user needs for displaying related data on the map interface

Task 3: Design and Development Developed additional data parsing functionality for J2735 data Developed initial processes for detecting pavement defects

Task 3.5: Design and Development No activities in this period

Task 3.6: Design and Development No activities in this period

Task 3.7: Design and Development JN122588 (Amend 3) - Completed

o Deploy DUAP Modifications to Test Environment - Completed Completed design of LCAR file ingestion Completed design of LCAR data entry process Completed design of LCAR data GUI display Completed design of LCAR data feed Continued improving pavement analysis processes Completed integration of data display and playback within the map interface

Task 3 Amendment 4: Design and Development JN113517 (Amend 4) – In Progress JN126918 (Amend 4) – In Progress Completed development of LCAR file ingestion Completed development of LCAR data entry process Completed development of LCAR data GUI display Completed development of LCAR data feed Continued improving pavement analysis processes Expanded the J2735 BSM parser to include some of the part 2 data Began design of TIM processes Began design and development of interface solutions between RSUs, signal controllers, and the back office Began design and development command and control processes for field devices

Task 4: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation No activities in this period

Task 4.5: Wx-TINFO System Testing No activities in this period

Task 4.6: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation JN125655 (Amend 2) - Completed Continued evaluation and further development of weather alerts Continued to develop and implement DUAP application functionality

o Continued work to assure stability and security of systemo Continued expanding pavement analysis processes and reportingo Continued work to implement user profile functionality

Continued to collect feedback from MDOT users as they begin to use DUAP (questions, comments, issues andenhancement opportunities)

Continued work on integration of road segmentso Added the display of road segments and their metadata

Continued expanding the functionality for the ingestion of DSRC data sourcesTask 4 Amendment 4: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation

JN126918 (Amend 4) – In Progresso Deploy system modifications – In Progress

Completed the processed for ingesting the LCAR data file Completed the display of the LCAR related data on the map interface Completed the data entry for lane closure information (TFR) Completed the LCAR related data extract feed Modified the J2735 BSM message parser to include additional part 2 data Modified the data playback processed for the map GUI provide additional options for viewing Continued to develop and implement DUAP application functionality

o Continued work to assure stability and security of systemo Continued expanding pavement analysis processes and reportingo Continued work to implement user profile functionality

34

Continued to collect feedback from MDOT users as they begin to use DUAP (questions, comments, issues andenhancement opportunities)

Continued work on integration of road segmentso Added the display of road segments and their metadata

Continued expanding the functionality for the ingestion of DSRC data sources Began work to integrate field device command and control processes

Task 5: Procure and Deploy Data Sources No activities in this period

Task 5.6: Procure and Deploy Data Sources JN125655 (Amend 2) - Completed

o Deploy operational system - Completed Continued collecting and processing weather data sources Continued collecting and processing MVDS data source Continued collecting and processing VIDAS data Continued collecting and processing GPS/AVL data Continued collecting and processing DMS information Continued processing CCTV image files and adding new CCTV sources Continue work on archiving and data purging processes

Task 5.7: Procure and Deploy Data Sources JN122588 (Amend 3) - Completed Began collecting and processing LCAR files Began process for the external TFR data feed Continue work on archiving and data purging processes

Task 5 Amendment 4: Procure and Deploy Data Sources JN113523 (Amend 4) – In Progress Continued collecting and processing LCAR files

o Worked with MDOT to improve the LCAR data being ingested Completed process for the external TFR feed Began collecting HERE data files

Task 6: Data Management and Distributions Design No activities in this period

Task 6.6: Data Management and Distributions Design JN125655 (Amend 2) - Completed

o Final Report supplemental - Completed Monitored data management processes for the data sources. Worked with data source contacts concerning availability and quality issues

Task 7: Data Collection Method Comparison and Exploration JN111941 (Original) - Completed


Evaluate and analyze other data sources for importing and usage, as identifiedo LCAR data files

Task 8: Application Convergence and Sustained Operations JN111941 (Original) - Completed

o Training Materials – Completedo Application procedures – Completedo System Evaluation & Operations – Completedo Final Report – Completedo Implementation Plan – Completed

Continue documenting DUAP applications for future use Continue analyzing the sustained functionality of the system Continue analyzing data from data sources

Task 8.6: Application Convergence and Sustained Operations JN125655 (Amend 2) - Completed Continue documenting DUAP applications for future use Continue analyzing the sustained functionality of the system Continue analyzing data from data sources

Task 9: Outreach and Awareness JN121364 (Original) - Completed

o Presentation Materials - Completedo Research Papers - Completed

Prepare outreach and awareness materials, as needed Discussion of future application implementation with SMEs

35

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Task 1: Concept Review and Refinement

JN111941 (Original) – Completedo Revised DUAP ConOps - Completedo List of Prototype Applications - Completedo Meeting Notes - Completed

JN122588 (Amend 3) - Completed No activities in this period

Task 2: User Needs Development JN111941 (Original) - Completed

o Revised ConOps - Completed No activities in this period

Task 2.5: Wx-TINFO Requirements Development JN122184 (WxTINFO) – Completed

o ConOps supplemental - Completed No activities in this period

Task 2.6: User Needs Development JN125655 (Amend 2) – Completed

o System Architecture supplemental – Completedo System Design supplemental - Completed

No activities in this periodTask 2.7: User Needs Development


Task 3: Design and Development JN111941 (Original) – Completed

o System Architecture - Completedo System Requirements - Completedo System Design - Completed

No activities in this periodTask 3.5: Design and Development

JN122184 (WxTINFO) – Completedo Document the system - Completed


JN125655 (Amend 2) – Completedo Deploy new system features - Completed


JN122588 (Amend 3) – Completedo Deploy DUAP Modifications to Test Environment - Completed

No activities in this periodTask 3 Amendment 4: Design and Development

JN113517 (Amend 4) – In Progress JN126918 (Amend 4) – In Progress Continue improving pavement analysis and defect detection processes

o Systems modifications planned completion date is March 31, 2017o HERE data ingestion process planned completion date is March 31, 2017

Design and develop the HERE data display processes Design and develop the BIM data display processes Design and develop the BIM data entry processes Complete design and development of interface solutions between RSUs, signal controllers, and the back office

o Planned completion date is April 30, 2017 Complete design and development of the command and control processes for field devices

o Planned completion date is April 30, 2017Task 4: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation

JN111941 (Original) – Completedo System Test Plan – Completedo Field Operational Test Plan – Completedo Field Operational Test Report – Completedo Data and Interface Specification – Completed

No activities in this periodTask 4.5: WxTINFO System Testing

JN122184 (WxTINFO) – Completedo Implemented systems - Completed

No activities in this period

36

Task 4.6: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation JN125655 (Amend 2) - Completed No activities in this period

Task 4 Amendment 4: Implementation, Testing and Evaluation JN126918 (Amend 4) – In Progress

o Deploy system modifications – In Progress Continue to develop and implement DUAP application functionality- Complete By April 30, 2017

o Continue work to assure stability and security of systemo Continue expanding pavement analysis and defect detection processes and reportingo Continue work to implement user profile functionalityo Continue work to display traffic signal datao Add functionality to display HERE datao Make adjustments to weather alerting processes as needed.

Continue to collect feedback from MDOT users as they begin to use DUAP (questions, comments, issues andenhancement opportunities)

Continue work on integration of road segments with other data sources Continue expanding the functionality for the ingestion of DSRC data sources Continue work to integrate field device command and control processes

Task 5: Procure and Deploy Data Sources JN111941 (Original) – Completed

o Data Collection Plan – Completedo Demonstrate Applications – Completed

No activities in this periodTask 5.6: Procure and Deploy Data Sources

JN125655 (Amend 2) - Completedo Deploy operational system - Completed

No activities in this periodTask 5.7: Procure and Deploy Data Sources


Task 5 Amendment 4: Procure and Deploy Data Sources- Complete by April 30, 2017 JN113523 (Amend 4) – In Progress Continue working with the HERE data files Make required modification to the AVL data ingestion processes for the new API Continue expanding functionality for DSRC and signal controller data sources Add additional data sources as identified.

Task 6: Data Management and Distributions Design JN111941 (Original) – Completed

o Prototype System - Completed No activities in this period

Task 6.6: Data Management and Distributions Design JN125655 (Amend 2) – Completed

o Final Report - Completed No activities in this period

Task 7: Data Collection Method Comparison and Exploration JN111941 (Original) – Completed


No activities in this periodTask 8: Application Convergence and Sustained Operations

JN111941 (Original) – – In Progresso Training Materials – Completedo Application procedures – Completedo System Evaluation & Operations – Completedo Final Report – Draft Report by: April 30, 2017 and Final Report by July 31, 2017.o Implementation Plan – Completed

No activities in this periodTask 8.6: Application Convergence and Sustained Operations


Task 9: Outreach and Awareness- Complete by April 30, 2017 JN121364 (Original) – Completed

o Presentation Materials - Completedo Research Papers – Completed

Prepare outreach and awareness materials, as needed- Complete by April 30, 2017 Discussion of future application implementation with SMEs

37

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) There have been several revisions to this contract. The initial revisions were in order to include the WxTINFO and IMO 3 initiatives with additional time extensions to deliver the remaining components of the DUAP II scope. An additional no cost time extension is pending to allow more time to complete all tasks. All required project deliverables are to be submitted to MDOT by April 30, 2017. The proposed revised project completion date is July 31, 2017.


Project expected completion in Fiscal Year 2017.

38


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Active Traffic Management (ATM) Technical Support


PROJECT MANAGER: Collin Castle

CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0236/Auth. 4 R1 PROJECT START DATE 7/1/2015 PROJECT NO. 128609 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 12/1/2015 OR NO. OR15-519 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 4/15/2016 RESEARCH AGENCY HNTB PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Morris


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $40,243.85 Total Vendor Budget $54,857.00 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $0.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $0.00 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $35,242.95 Total Budget $54,857.00 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $49,856.10


The development of an Active Traffic Management (ATM) Technical Agenda was requested based on an Office Memorandum, dated January 12, 2015, from Gregory C. Johnson, P.E. The purpose of the ATM Technical Agenda is to ensure MDOT is approaching ATM applications of technology and operational business practices in a cohesive manner throughout the state. The scope of the request included the following:

• Reviewing past and current experience with ATM applications, projects, and operations.• Developing a guidance document to assist department staff in selecting and implementing ATM.• Developing a methodology for monitoring and adjusting on-going operations for ATM applications.• Providing an understanding and/or recommendation for the following topics:

o Capital and operating costs and benefit/cost analysiso Use of tolling and High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)o Legal or statutory restrictions or modifications necessaryo Coordination with transit providers, emergency response agencies, and law enforcemento Relationship of ATM to existing statutory and regulatory provisions and recommendations for changeso Role and relationship of ATM decision making process to the Engineering Operations Committee (EOC), its

subcommittees, and the Project/Program Review Board (PPRB)FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

The following are Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Accomplishments: • Researching and documenting the requested ATM considerations (as defined in the scope of the office memorandum

request)• Development of a Draft ATM Technical Agenda

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The following are FY 2016 Accomplishments:

• Continued development of a Draft ATM Technical Agenda (now referred to as Draft ATM Strategies and Concepts Guide.• Conducted three in-person workshops to review and modify the draft document.• Prepared final Draft ATM Strategies and Concepts Guide for submittal to FHWA for review.• Responded to FHWA comments and prepared revised Final ATM Strategies and Concepts Guide.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) The consultant report was presented and reviewed by the Engineer Operations Committee. The original due date was late Fall 2015. The final report was approved by EOC and submitted to FHWA in 2016.


The ATM Strategies and Concepts Guide will be converted into an MDOT Wiki format and become available via MDOT's website.

39


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Evaluating the Use of Tow Plows in Michigan


PROJECT MANAGER: Melissa Howe CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0065 Z1 PROJECT START DATE 3/30/2013 PROJECT NO. 128611 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 3/30/2015 OR NO. OR14-006 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 9/30/2016 RESEARCH AGENCY Lawrence Technological University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Nishantha Bandara




Due to the rising costs of winter maintenance and the environmental concerns related to usage of salt, MDOT has embarked on a number of innovative approaches to enhance winter maintenance operations. These include: Pre-wetting, alternative de-icing and anti-icing products, Road Weather Information Systems (RWIS), etc. One of the new pieces of equipment evaluated for the same purpose by other State DOT’s and Canadian provinces includes the Tow Plow. A Tow plow is a trailer mounted snow plow with 26’ blade. When attached to a traditional snow plow with 12’ front plow, the combination can clear a 25’ path. MDOT has purchased one Tow Plow and is in the process of purchasing more units and there is a need for assessing the effectiveness of the Tow Plow in terms of efficiency, cost-effectiveness and safety.

The scope of the project includes the following primary tasks: 1. Understand the current state of practice for Tow Plows across the nation2. Learn the benefits/draw backs of utilizing Tow Plow3. Understand the most efficient use of Tow Plows in Michigan4. Development of training materials for operators on safe and effective use of Tow Plows

In order to fulfil the above, the following tasks will be completed at the conclusion of this project: 1. Conduct Comprehensive Literature Review2. Perform a Survey of Winter Weather States3. Compare the Effectiveness of Tow Plow to Traditional Truck/wing Plow Setup4. Perform Benefit/Cost Analysis for Tow Plow to Truck/wing Plow Setup5. Develop Recommendations for MDOT Management as to the Safest and Most Effective Areas to Utilize Tow Plows6. Develop Training Materials for Operators including a tow plow training video.7. Develop a Final Report describing major research results and implementation recommendations

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The following tasks were completed during Fiscal Year (FY) 2013: Task 1: Conduct a comprehensive Literature Review 90 percent of this task has been completed during the first quarter and details were included in the Quarterly Report 1 (QR 1). This task will continue until the completion of the project.

Task 2: Perform a Survey of Winter Weather States a. The creation of survey distribution database has been completed.b. The survey was finalized and deployed through “Survey Monkey”. A reminder e-mail was sent on 10/11/2013 and survey

is closed on 10/31/2013. At the end of the survey period, there were 53 respondents. Analysis of survey responses iscurrently underway

Approximately 80 percent of this task is completed at this time.

Task 3: Compare the Effectiveness of Tow Plow to Traditional Plow a. A meeting was held on 9/4/2013 at Brighton Garage to finalize snow routes for the comparison study. It was determined

that the I-96 Snow Route will be divided into two sections (M-59 to US-23 and US-23 to Oakland County line) for thecomparison study and few more comparison sites are to be determined from the Lansing Transportation ServiceCenter (TSC) area.

40

b. Configuring Dynatest “Survey” program to measure the condition of the roadway behind the Tow Plow/Traditional Plowis underway.

c. Comparison sites and pavement condition measuring technique will be presented to MDOT Project Manager (PM) andResearch Advisory Panel (RAP) members during the progress meeting on November 20, 2013.


Task 4: Perform Benefit-Cost Analysis for Tow Plow to Truck/Wing Plow Setup a. Development of a benefit-cost analysis methodology is currently underway. The developed method will be presented

to MDOT PM and RAP members during the progress meeting on November 20, 2013.b. Winter weather related accident database for the Livingston County has been completed. Assigning each accident to

different snow routes in the county is underway.c. Creation of winter storm database for the Livingston County is currently underway.d. Update to the MDOT Winter Maintenance Activities Record Sheet was proposed by the Principal Investigator (PI).

Currently, MDOT is considering the PI’s request.Approximately 15 percent of this task was complete at this time.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Task1: Literature Review This task was completed during the First Quarter; however, this task will continue throughout the project to include any new information related to Tow Plow research.

Task 2: Survey of Winter Weather States This task was completed during the second quarter.

Task 3: Compare the effectiveness of Tow Plow to traditional truck/wing plow This task was performed during three winter storms. The following types of data were collected during three winter storms:

a. Friction Data behind Tow Plow and Regular Plowb. Surface Condition behind Tow Plow and Regular Plowc. Operating Speed of the Tow Plow/Regular Plowd. Traffic condition behind Tow Plow/Regular Plowe. Pictures of the pavement

Further analysis of collected data is in progress.

Task 4: Perform Benefit-Cost Analysis for Tow Plow to Truck/Wing Plow Setup a. Previously created winter storm database for Livingston County was checked for errors and updates were made.b. Winter weather related accident database for the Livingston County for year 2012-2013 has been completed and QA/QC

was completed during the last quarter.c. MDOT Form 14100 data was used to get winter maintenance data for each snow route in Livingston County.

Both 2012-2013 year data and 2013-2014 data were compiled and sorted for different maintenance segments for each winter storm.

d. MDOT granted access to RITIS database to analyze traffic speed during winter storms and time to regain normal speed during winter storms. Analysis were completed for winter seasons 2012-2013 and 2013-2014.

e. Currently developing a cost model to determine the benefit-cost of tow-plow to truck/wing plow setup.f. Approximately 60 percent of this task is completed at this time.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Task1: Literature Review Most of the activities related this task was completed last FY.

Task 2: Survey of Winter Weather States This task was completed during the second quarter of last FY.

Task 3: Compare the effectiveness of Tow Plow to traditional truck/wing plow This task was performed during 4 winter storms in 2014-2015. The following types of data were collected during those winter Storms:

a. Friction Data behind Tow Plow and Regular Plowb. Surface Condition behind Tow Plow and Regular Plowc. Operating Speed of the Tow Plow/Regular Plowd. Traffic condition behind Tow Plow/Regular Plowe. Pictures of the pavement

During the 2014-2015 data collection was extended to I-96 in Williamston garage as well. This task was completed in March, 2015.

Task 4: Perform Benefit-Cost Analysis for Tow Plow to Truck/Wing Plow Setup The following data items were compiled and QA/QC was performed for the purpose of benefit-cost analysis.

a. Winter storm database for the Livingston County for years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015.b. MDOT winter maintenance data (MDOT Form 14100) for years 2012-2013, 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 for Livingston

County, Williamston Garage, Grand Ledge Garage and Reed City Garage.c. Traffic speed during winter storms and time to regain normal speed during winter storms for winter seasons 2012-2013,

2013-2014 and 2014-2015.

41

d. Benefit-cost of tow-plow to truck/wing plow setup for different snow routes in Grand Ledge, and Reed City garages.Livingston county and Williamston Garage are completed.


Task 7: Develop Draft Report This task was completed during this quarter and draft final report was submitted to the MDOT PM on 9/30/2015.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Task 4: Perform Benefit-Cost Analysis for Tow Plow to Truck/Wing Plow Setup This task was completed. Data from the 2015/2016 winter season was compiled, analyzed and incorporated into the final report. Data from the 2015/2016 winter season at the Charlotte, Williamston and Brighton garages were utilized to conduct further benefit to cost analysis. This data enabled researchers to further investigate tow-plow to truck/wing plow for a modified equipment configuration.

Task 5: Develop recommendations for MDOT management as to most effective areas to use Tow Plow. This task was completed. The cost-benefit analysis showed that assuming the use of 17 tow plows on MDOT-maintained four- and six-lane expressways, MDOT could save $1.9 million annually in direct costs, such as salt, equipment, and labor. Savings are significantly higher when accounting for reductions in travel delays. Researchers recommended using tow plows on four- or six-lane expressways for storms with snowfall of 1 inch or more, and provided further recommendations for the number of regular plows to use in conjunction with the tow plow depending on the amount of snowfall and the number of lanes to be cleared.

Task 6: Develop training materials This task was completed. A tow plow training video was developed. This approximately 9 minute video steps an operator through the process of performing pre-and post-trip inspections for tow plows, describes how to control and maneuver a tow plow as well as provide helpful tips for operating a tow plow safely and effectively. 2 DVD copies and a digital copy were provided.

Task 7: Develop Final report This task was completed. The final report encompassed the results of the tasks performed, including the literature review and survey of winter weather states that assessed other states use of tow plows. The final report compared the effectiveness of tow plows to standard plows by collecting data on their operating speeds as well as the condition and friction of pavements after plowing. The final report describes the results of the cost-benefit analysis of tow plows. This analysis relied on data from several MDOT garages, including number of driver hours, amount of salt and other materials used, and other details related to winter storms. The conclusion of the report provided recommendations on the most effective ways to use tow plows in our fleet.


Not Applicable. Project concluded September 2016 JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))

Several no cost time extensions were granted due to lack of snow storms the winter of 2014/15 that would have provided data collection opportunities. To reduce the potential for skewing the final results of the C/B analysis, new winter storm data was provided to the researcher in April, 2016, which had to be manually input by the researcher. Additional time was also needed to analyze the data and complete the project. Approval dates for the extensions were 3/2/2015, 6/9/2015, 8/24/2015, 1/13/2016, and 5/3/2016.


Results showed that tow plows are just as effective at snow removal as regular plows, reduce travel delays and significantly lower delay costs to the traveling public. With the right equipment configuration in a fleet, they can also lead to significant savings in direct costs.

Survey and literature review results revealed that a number of transportation agencies across the United States had used tow plows successfully to provide the same level of service with less staff and lower snow removal times. The field evaluation showed no differences in pavement friction behind tow plows as compared to regular plows, suggesting they both have the same snow removal effectiveness. Field results also showed that both regular plows and tow plows operated in the same speed range. Although traffic behind the tow plows generally was congested during plowing, the overall vehicle delay along these routes during winter events was significantly less than when only regular plows were used.

The cost-benefit analysis showed that assuming the use of 17 tow plows on MDOT-maintained four- and six-lane expressways, MDOT could save $1.9 million annually in direct costs, such as salt, equipment, and labor. Savings are significantly higher when accounting for reductions in travel delays. Researchers recommended using tow plows on four- or six-lane expressways for storms with snowfall of 1 inch or more, and provided further recommendations for the number of regular plows to use in conjunction with the tow plow depending on the amount of snowfall and the number of lanes to be cleared.

Along with reducing winter maintenance costs and travel delays, tow plows can increase public safety and reduce plow driver fatigue by lowering the amount of time plows spend on the road. MDOT will continue to collect data on the effectiveness of tow plows as the agency determines whether to expand tow plow use within Michigan and identifies which Interstates would benefit most from tow plow use. This project also involved the development of a tow plow training video, which will help MDOT more effectively instruct operators on the use of this promising technology.

42


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Performance Evaluation of Subgrade Stabilization with Recycled Materials


PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Grazioli CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0065 Z3 PROJECT START DATE 10/1/2013 PROJECT NO. 128612 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 4/30/2015 OR NO. OR14-009 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 1/31/2016 RESEARCH AGENCY Lawrence Technological University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Nishantha Bandara


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $32,030.28 Total Vendor Budget $213,535.18 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $0.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $1,283.91 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $39,787.17 Total Budget $214,819.09 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $180,213.37


Perform thorough review of recycled materials available for potential soils stabilization in Michigan. Obtain representative soil samples throughout Michigan for laboratory testing after the recycled materials are mixed with the soils. Assess the long term performance of projects that have used soil stabilization techniques to date, make recommendations relative to pavement design support values. Develop a guidance matrix for MDOT Engineers to assist with the potential selection of soils stabilization techniques and materials on future projects.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The project started at the beginning of the Fiscal Year (FY). Soil samples were obtained at three locations throughout the state; two in Metro Detroit and one in the upper peninsula. Laboratory testing began on the collected soils mixing the stabilization materials determined through literature and industry practice review. Field testing occurred on MDOT roadways that were stabilized in 2005, 2008 and 2010.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Laboratory testing was most prevalent throughout this FY. This included the design and fabrication of freeze-thaw apparatus and the soil testing itself. Data was analyzed from the information collected in the laboratory and field. Mechanistic-Empirical design analysis occurred to try and categorize soil stiffness values. Writing of the final report commenced.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The last of the freeze-thaw laboratory testing was completed and the final report was written, reviewed and accepted on February 29, 2016.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES

None. The project is complete. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))

A no cost time extension was approved 3/30/2015 at the request of the Principal Investigator because laboratory work took more time than expected. Another extension was granted 12/31/2015 due to a delay material availability and needed adjustments to the freeze-thaw testing protocol. This was followed by an additional extension 1/31/2016 to allow concurrence on recommendations and time for MDOT staff to review the final report. In the end an additional month was required for thorough MDOT review and report completion. The final report was dated and delivered to MDOT on February 29, 2016.


The project came to the following conclusions; • Concrete fines when mixed with soil did not improve soil strength characteristics.• Cement Kiln Dust (CKD), Lime Kiln Dust (LKD) and Fly Ash (FA) when mixed with soil improved soil strength

characteristics. Material addition percentages varied with the material and intended stabilization purpose.• Four past projects that employed soils stabilization, two built in 2008 and two built in 2010, all have retained improved soil

strength characteristics. Verification was obtained through field testing methods.• Severe laboratory freeze-thaw testing revealed degradation in stabilized soil strength characteristics.• Increasing soil stiffness values for stabilized soils during pavement design is not recommended.• For inadequate strength soils, excavate and replace methods becomes cost prohibitive compared to soils stabilization

when the area of treatment approaches 25% of the total project area.

43


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Evaluating Road Delineation Practices in Michigan


PROJECT MANAGER: Mary Bramble

CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2016-0019 PROJECT START DATE 10/1/2015 PROJECT NO. 128649 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 3/31/2017 OR NO. OR 14-017 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Opus International Consultants Inc. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Andrew Ceifetz


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $112,273.79 Total Vendor Budget $159,657.00 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $6,600.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $7,200.00 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $47,127.56 Total Budget $166,857.00

MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $47,127.56 Total Amount Available $119,729.44

PURPOSE AND SCOPE MDOT spends millions of dollars a year installing and maintaining pavement markings, rumble strips and delineators as part of its delineation program. Installation of pavement markings, rumble strips, and delineators is done via construction contract with a variety of materials. Pavement marking maintenance is done via an annual restriping program using two products, waterborne paint (WB) and sprayable thermoplastic paint (STP). These two products are considered to be ‘1 year’ products. The majority of pavement markings on the state trunkline system are WB and STP.

MDOT needs to determine if the current system is appropriate or if a new process should be instituted. Several neighboring states with the same snow plow conditions use different styles of delineators and only use durable pavement markings (non-recessed epoxy) in their construction projects, and then restripe after a certain number of years with their own paint crews.

MDOT would like to investigate the service life for various types of pavement markings and delineators on different pavement materials, conditions, and roadway configurations, then compare different practices between states and determine the cost/benefit of the different practices. Project scope includes the following:

i. Review available literature.ii. Survey states for their practices.iii. Collect Michigan specific data.iv. Identify the critical factors influencing application and installation.v. Identify the components of a successful delineation program.vi. Alternative strategy analysis.vii. Recommend a delineation strategy to meet the Department’s roadway delineation goal.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1. Identified the components:

a. Identified roadway delineation systems, including both short and long distance viewing delineation, for all portions of the roadway except intersections.

2. Identified application influencing factors:a. Identified the most critical design factors influencing delineation component application and installation

3. Reviewed literature and survey states:a. Conducted a literature search and synthesis to understand the state of knowledge concerning roadway delineation

components and influential design factors identified in items 1 and 2.b. Documented the North Central United States transportation departments’ design guides, policies, and procedures.

4. Collected Michigan specific data:a. Collected information on MDOT’s existing delineation program and guidelines.b. Collected information on MDOT’s roadway delineation assets.

5. Began alternative strategy analysis:a. Conducting a cost benefit and life cycle cost analysis of several freeway and non-freeway statewide roadway

delineation deployment alternatives. Include both long-term and short-term strategies.

44

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES 1. Complete alternative strategy analysis:

a. Conduct a cost benefit and life cycle cost analysis of several freeway and non-freeway statewide roadway delineation deployment alternatives. Include both long-term and short-term strategies.

2. Present alternative analysis at a Engineering Operations Committee for input3. Recommend a delineation strategy to meet the Department’s roadway delineation goal:

“Deliver a cost efficient asset-managed delineation system on MDOT roadways that provides positive guidanceto keep motorists safely in their lane during normal driving conditions and strives to deliver delineation in severeweather conditions."a. Recommend a cost effective alternative that meets the delineation goal.b. Develop design standards that can be used to implement it.c. Identify Policy that is needed to implement and support the strategy.d. Consider how to implement the recommendations using performance based techniques and identifying challenges.

4. Prepare final report detailing best pavement marking and delineator practices for a snowplow state including initial materials, maintenance processes, product and application verification, cost to implement, and any measurable links to safety that can assist the Department in meeting its roadway delineation goal.


None SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION (Required the last year of the project)

Project expected completion in FY 17

45


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Michigan Rural Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) Development and Support


PROJECT MANAGER: Dean Kanitz

CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0066 Z5 PROJECT START DATE 10/10/2015 PROJECT NO. 128651 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2017 OR NO. OR 14-027 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Michigan State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Timothy Gates




PURPOSE AND SCOPE The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) is a document based on a decade of research utilizing information that has been collected from many states and countries from around the world. To have full functionality of the HSM for Michigan, there is a need to develop Safety Performance Functions (SPFs) tailored to segment, intersection, and ramps of urban, rural, and local agency facilities. SPFs will allow transportation professionals at all levels the ability to scientifically evaluate facilities prior to design for expected number of crashes, crash severities, crash types, and return on investment from a safety perspective. There is a significant amount of data that needs to be collected to gain a full perspective for the development of SPFs for each site type in the HSM. The SPFs developed for Michigan will allow professionals to perform network surveillance on a more precise level, which will benefit all roadway users. This research will result in better locations being selected that will generate safer roadways. In the long-term perspective, it will be cheaper for tax payers by having more accurate returns on investment by reducing crashes making travel faster and better. The scope of work includes the following:

1. Literature Review2. Identification of Sites3. Data Collection4. Data Analysis5. SPF Development6. Develop Maintenance Cycle7. Develop Maintenance Process8. Develop Deliverables9. Demonstration materials and meetings


The literature review is underway, along with the identification of sites and the beginning stages of data collection. FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES

The remaining tasks are scheduled to be completed during the window of FY17. FY18 will see the implementation of the effort. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))



46


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Association of Michigan's Older Adult Crashes with Roadway Features


PROJECT MANAGER: Kim Lariviere


RESEARCH AGENCY Western Michigan University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Valerian Kwigizile


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $200,000.00 Total Vendor Budget $209,833.00 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $18,100.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $7,813.47 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $85,439.16 Total Budget $217,645.47 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $2,413.47 Total Expenditures $87,852.63


By 2030, older adults age 65 and above, will represent about 20 percent of the population in Michigan and Nationally. As this population ages, the Older Driver segment has received more national attention and focus, and is starting to be considered in the design of our infrastructure. Studies have shown that older drivers are prone to an increased risk of crash involvement per vehicle mile traveled and are more likely to be severely injured or killed as a result of a crash. Factors contributing to this issue include, but are not limited to: Declines in vision, in particular at night, cognitive abilities, and physical limitations, such as arthritis and an inability to recover from injuries. Michigan will look at locations where older drivers are over represented in crashes and identify specific roadway features of each location (roadway geometry, traffic volumes, and visual complexity) and causation then determine engineering solutions with the assistance of the Older Driver Highway Design Handbook (due out in 2012) for identified roadway configurations experiencing a disproportionate number of crashes involving older adults.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The literature review identified roadway features impacting older adult crashes. The collection and review of crash data identified locations in which older adults are over-represented in crashes. A survey of older adults identified their opinions on roadway configurations, perspective on potential engineering solutions, and type of driving maneuvers they tend to avoid. Exposure measures were developed. Data collection at selected locations identified safety factors associated with those sites.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES Proposed fiscal year 2017 activates include identification of alternative transportation options, conducting economic analysis, developing roadway design guidance, and writing the final report.



Project completion expected in FY 17

47


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Research Program Services FUNDING SOURCE: SPR, Part II OTHER (PLEASE EXPLAIN)

PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Polsdofer CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2016-0060 PROJECT START DATE 1/1/2016 PROJECT NO. 129171 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2019 OR NO. OR15-001 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY CTC and Associates LLC PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Patrick Casey



Total Amount Available $393,468.47

PURPOSE AND SCOPE MDOT is striving to deliver innovative research results publicly. If effective communication is not provided, research results can end up sitting on a shelf with no one using the outcomes to improve operations. This project addresses this problem by transferring the outcomes from the research project report to the Department and public in clear and simplified documents and also by working with Research Administration to continue to improve their operations.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Spotlights completed: Subgrade Stabilization with Recycled Materials, High Performance Concrete for Highway Bridges, and Evaluating the Use of Tow Plows in production. Innovation Snapshot Folios, including new design template and product logo featuring four articles drafted, were edited and laid out. September and October were completed. Research Update Newsletter was completed by September 30th. Environmental Services Section PowerPoints: Hydraulics Unit completed, Endangered Species (Compliance Unit) largely completed, and Environmental Clearance also largely completed. Final Report Editing: Bridge Design System completed.


Completion of additional Spotlights, Innovation Snapshots, Newsletters, report editing, and other services as needed. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))


Project expected completion in FY 19.

48


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Evaluation of Cost/Benefits of Standardization of Secondary Route Bridges


PROJECT MANAGER: Keith Cooper CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2016-0070 Z1 PROJECT START DATE 3/1/2016 PROJECT NO. 129657 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 3/31/2018 OR NO. OR15-182 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Wayne State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Christopher Eamon




There are over 1,000 local bridges that are structurally deficient (SD) and the majority of these are single span structures less than 100 feet long. A cost effective method is needed for replacing these bridges. Most local agency bridge owners have little to no bridge design experience and they rely upon MDOT standards and a network of consultants who serve their bridge design needs. MDOT standards typically are written with MDOT trunkline bridges in mind and these standards may not be the most appropriate for local agency bridges, which are typically smaller and located on lesser traveled routes. The project scope includes the following tasks:

1. Review current and state of the art bridge design practices.2. Review MDOT and Local Agency Bridge Inventory for most common single span bridge structures. Review

standard details and typical single span bridge design plans. Identify most cost effective details.3. Conduct focus groups with each of the following audiences to understand the key factors and understand the

feasibility of the cost effective details identified in task 2: 1) Local Agency bridge owners, 2) MDOT bridgedesigners, 3) Consultant bridge designers, and 4) Contractors and fabricators.

4. Perform life cycle cost analysis on various types of bridge replacements.5. Recommend standardized design procedures and standardized design details in the most effective design

increments. Lengths, skews, beam types, etc.6. Develop implementation and educational plan to educate local agencies about cost saving and improved quality

control using standardized design plans.7. Conduct training workshops tailored for the needs and interest of the following key audiences: 1) local agency

bridge owners, 2) MDOT bridge designers, 3) consultant bridge and local agency designers, 4) contractors andfabricators.

8. Document findings and develop deliverables.FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Completed literature review, identified cost-effective designs, held stakeholder focus groups for input on design and constructability of specific bridge superstructures and began conducting probabilistic life cycle cost analysis.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES Develop standard plans for secondary route bridges and an educational plan to communicate the purpose and results of this research project.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) One revision was approved on 8/5/2016 in order to shift funds between fiscal years and ensure the university does not run into problems with summer salaries and graduated research assistant tuition.



49


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Developing Representative Michigan Truck Configurations for Bridge Load Rating


PROJECT MANAGER: Creightyn McMunn

CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2016-0070 Z2 PROJECT START DATE 3/1/2016 PROJECT NO. 129666 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 2/28/2018 OR NO. OR14-023 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Wayne State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Christopher Eamon




Federal regulations require that each State maintain a current load rating of each bridge in its inventory, which reflects the capacity of the bridge with respect to State legal loads. The Michigan Vehicle Code provides legal limitations on axle weight and overall truck length, width and height, as well as several exceptions that were implemented to accommodate industrial and commercial shipping needs within the State. As a result, there are currently 28 truck types that are analyzed to encompass the load effect of all Michigan legal load configurations. The purpose of this research is to identify any discrepancies between current load rating practices and the Michigan Vehicle Code and to develop recommendations for grouping truck types to create a representative Michigan legal load truck configuration for efficient and accurate load rating. The scope of work includes the following tasks:

1. Review and summarize the Michigan Vehicle Code as well as other available literature.2. Interview and collaborate with Michigan law enforcement and the trucking industry to develop an understanding for

current needs and limitations with respect to the Michigan Vehicle Code requirements and enforcement.3. Review several years of existing available weigh in motion (WIM) data and determine if additional WIM stations or data

collection are warranted to complete the research. Analyze the existing WIM data to determine which recorded vehiclesrepresent legal or permitted vehicles.

4. Compare data analysis results with the current 28 Michigan legal trucks and the Michigan Vehicle Code to identifydiscrepancies.

5. Develop recommendations for grouping truck types or develop new load rating vehicles to create a representativeMichigan legal load truck configuration for efficient and accurate load rating. This analysis should account for LFR andLRFR analysis methods and requirements.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The researcher completed a literature review, which included a review of the Michigan Vehicle Code, Michigan Truck Driver’s Manual, and several research reports. The researcher interviewed MDOT load rating and permit area staff, as well as members of Michigan law enforcement and the trucking industry. They also began analysis of existing WIM data.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES The researcher will continue analysis of existing WIM data to determine which recorded vehicles represent legal or permitted vehicles and will compare data analysis results with the 28 Michigan legal truck configurations and the Michigan Vehicle Code to identify any discrepancies. They will then develop recommendations for grouping truck types or develop new load rating to create a representative Michigan legal truck configuration.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) One revision was approved on 8/5/2016 in order to shift funds between fiscal years and ensure the university does not run into problems with summer salaries and graduate research assistant tuition.



50


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Evaluating the Impacts of Speed Limit Changes on Identified Case Studies


PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Bott CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2016-0069 Z1 PROJECT START DATE 3/1/2016 PROJECT NO. 129831 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 12/31/2017 OR NO. OR 15-178 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Western Michigan University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Valerian Kwigizile




PURPOSE AND SCOPE Since 2000, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) with the Michigan State Police have raised the posted speed limit of several rural and urban freeways. Research done in 2000, The Impacts of Raising the Speed Limit on Freeways, Michigan, evaluated the change of posted speeds along 1,500 miles of freeways. The results showed a slight increase in fatal crashes but a decrease in incapacitating injury crashes. Total crashes did increase. The research also showed a decrease in severe truck crashes but an increase in crashes involving trucks. Overall, there was a small increase in the speed of traffic. However, this increase was not experienced at all locations and the change was not greater than 2 mph at any location. The purpose of this research is to evaluate if these conclusions regarding crashes and an increase in operating speed in response to an increase in posted speed limits are still valid today on freeways. The project scope includes the following:

a. Literature reviewb. Speed and crash data collection.c. Crash Data Analysisd. Speed Data Analysise. Economic Analysisf. Final Report and Presentation

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The literature review has been completed. In addition, the survey of other state DOTs has been taken along with the collection of crash and speed data.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES The state DOT survey will be summarized and the crash and speed data analysis completed. During this time period the economic analysis will also be completed.




51


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Assessment of Countermeasure Gaps, Predictive Crash Analysis and Engineering Safety Programs in Michigan


PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Shaughnessy


RESEARCH AGENCY Michigan State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Timothy Gates


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $76,909.36 Total Vendor Budget $288,885.00 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $12,040.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $19,940.00 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Budget $308,825.00 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $0.00


PM: PLEASE REVIEW AND MODIFY AS NEEDED Michigan has seen a 36% decline in fatalities since 1995. In 2010, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) adopted Toward Zero Deaths (TZD) as a strategic area of focus for safety. This project looks into improvement that could be made in Michigan to continue and accelerate past successes and move TZD forward.

the following scope is proposed: 1. Literature review.2. Review the engineering portions of the TZD National Strategy.3. Utilize a national crash databases, to determine states that have made recent progress in reducing fatal crashes.4. Review and synthesize “Zero Goal” strategies developed by state agencies nationally.5. Conduct State DOT interviews regarding TZD strategies and safety program processes.6. Conduct local agency interviews regarding TZD strategies and safety program processes.7. Determine highly effective engineering treatments not currently used in Michigan.8. Review the current Michigan local agency call for projects process.9. Conduct interviews on the current MDOT trunkline and local agency safety calls for projects.10. Develop a gap analysis and recommend safety strategies that can be further deployed.11. Separate and classify crashes by severity, frequency, and jurisdiction including trunkline/local, rural/urban, and others.12. Utilize gap analysis and crash data to predict the safety impacts of implementing strategies.13. Provide recommendations to the trunkline and local agency safety calls for projects processes.14. Develop a tool and user guide for MDOT, local agencies, and consultants to prioritize safety countermeasures.15. Recommend changes to and refine the current TOR form16. Conduct training workshops on TZD, gap analysis and crash impacts, and new/revised tools17. Develop and deliver draft and final reports.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Task 1: Literature Review The literature review has begun. State and federal TZD content is being reviewed to determine best practices. General highway safety literature is being reviewed. This task is ongoing and expected to be completed by the end of Q1 FY17

Task 2: Review and Synthesis of Engineering Portions of National TZD Strategy This task is underway based on materials obtained in Task 1. This task is ongoing and expected to be completed by the end of Q1 FY17.

Task 4: Review and Synthesis of “Zero Goal” Strategies Developed by State Agencies This task is underway based on materials obtained in Task 1. This task is ongoing and expected to be completed by the end of Q1 FY17.

Task 5: Identify and Conduct State Agency Interviews Regarding TZD and Safety Program Processes Identification of the states utilizing best practices for TZD has been initiated. This work is ongoing and will be completed in Q2 of FY17.

52

Task 6: Identify and Conduct Local Agency Interviews Regarding TZD and Safety Program Processes An email has been developed to initiate contact with select local agencies. The team has been working through Pam Blazo at MDOT to identify local agencies to contact. Several local agencies have been contacted and have agreed to participate in these interviews which will be completed in Q2 of FY17.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES 1. Complete literature review2. Complete review and synthesis of engineering TZD strategies3. Complete review and synthesis of state Zero Goal strategies4. Identify states for state agency interviews5. Begin local agency interviews




53


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Development of 3D and 4D Bridge Models and Plans


PROJECT MANAGER: Talia Belill CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2016-0175 PROJECT START DATE 3/1/2016 PROJECT NO. 129889 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 2/28/2018 OR NO. OR15-191 COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 3/31/2018 RESEARCH AGENCY Parsons Brinckerhoff PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Francesca Maier


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $63,407.02 Total Vendor Budget $273,352.93 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $10,050.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $11,096.26 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $52,404.17 Total Budget $284,449.19 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $1,046.26 Total Expenditures $53,450.43


MDOT’s road design, survey, and construction processes are rapidly developing and implementing 3D and 4D (4D is time or project schedule) modeling for plan set development and operational management. Research is needed to develop and standardize bridge 3D and 4D bridge modeling in coordination with these other processes. The models will be used by bridge designers during the design process to size and place bridge components, confirm fit-up of precast elements, identify conflicts, show part-width and multi-stage construction, and demonstrate accelerated bridge construction sequence. They should communicate the bridge plan set to engineers and contractors in a unique new way that will help to coordinate and implement global project activities. Finally, the model should be standardized so that in the future it can be integrated with or communicate with bridge operational needs, including bridge inspection, load rating, and management. The proposed scope of work for this study includes the following tasks:

i. Literature Review.ii. Industry Survey/MDOT Interviews.iii. MDOT Standards Review.iv. Develop Features and Review Software.v. Develop Software Workspace.vi. Create 3D and 4D Bridge Model Examples.vii. Develop Instructional Material.viii. Final Report/Presentation of Model Examples & Findings.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The literature review, industry survey and MDOT interviews were completed and included in the Phase 1 Draft Report. A Research Advisory Panel (RAP) meeting was held to discuss the draft report. Subsequently, the RAP’s report feedback was compiled.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES The vendor intends to finalize the Phase 1 Report, review MDOT standards and workflows, develop features and review software, develop Phase 2 Report, develop software workspace, and create 3D/4D models.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) This contract was revised 4/26/2016 to move the effective date of the contract back by approximately one month. There was also a change to the project manager 7/12/2016 due to staff changes at MDOT.



54


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Development of Differential Criteria for Determining Appropriateness of ‘Side-Path’ Applications for Bicycle Use. FUNDING SOURCE: SPR, Part II OTHER (PLEASE EXPLAIN)

PROJECT MANAGER: Josh DeBruyn

CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2016-0274 PROJECT START DATE 6/1/2016 PROJECT NO. 130572 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 6/30/2018 OR NO. OR15-186 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Toole Design Group PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Toole Design Group, LLC



MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $2,120.75 Total Expenditures $81,922.00 Total Amount Available $247,321.21

PURPOSE AND SCOPE Metrics are needed to determine when on-road facilities are appropriate in addition to side-paths in urban and suburban environments to accommodate bicyclists. Inappropriate application and use of side-paths may result in higher risk to bicyclists who perceive such facilities as “safe” due to separation from the motor vehicle traffic stream. On a side-path, bicyclists are less visible to motorists entering/exiting driveways and at intersections. At intersections, if bicyclists riding on a side-path don’t dismount and cross the intersection like a pedestrian on the walk signal, or slow to walking speed, they may be at greater risk of being involved in a crash from right or left turning vehicles. The risk of crash is often amplified due to drivers and bicyclists having less reaction time than for pedestrians traveling at low speed. Tasks within the scope include: 1. Gain better understanding of bicycle crashes with respect to frequency, location, bicyclists’ direction of travel and speed, and

severity of sidewalk/side path crashes versus on roadway crashes.2. Investigate land use characteristics and general context of the crash locations including evaluation and frequency of driveways,

sight distances, posted speed, driveway/intersection traffic volume (actual and/or via ITE Trip Generation Manual) and assess the locations and crashes to see if the crash could have been avoided, or severity reduced, if the bicyclists were on a different type of bicycle facility or in a different location within the road Right of Way (ROW).

3. Develop an understanding of the different reasons bicyclists choose to ride where they do.4. Produce a tool/spreadsheet model for assessing crash risk/potential of various bicycle facilities that can assist planners,

engineers, and bicyclists with information on the facility appropriateness based on land use and crash potential.5. Develop educational materials to inform bicyclists and motorists about safety and crash scenarios with respect to bicycling on

different facility types in different land use contexts.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Toole Design Group in conjunction with Wayne State University prepared an online survey and project website. Survey data was collected from a random sample of Michigan residents. Crash analysis site selection was completed and control sections were nearly completed. Data collection options for collecting bicycle volumes were explored. Tasks 1, 2, and 3 described in the Purpose and Scope have all been initiated and data collection to complete some of these tasks are complete.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES Toole Design Group and Wayne State University will evaluate the survey responses and begin work on the crash analysis (Task 3 and 4). Additional bicycle volume data will be collected in the spring of 2017 (if necessary). The development of a planning and decision making tool/metrics on bicycle facility selection will begin. Educational materials to reflect the findings of the research will also be prepared.




55


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Further Assessment of Safe, Quick Clearance Strategies - Phase II


PROJECT MANAGER: Annjanette Kremer CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2016-0287 PROJECT START DATE 5/1/2016 PROJECT NO. 130579 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2017 OR NO. OR 15-144 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Gannett Fleming of Michigan, Inc. PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Eric Rensel




PURPOSE AND SCOPE A previous study for Implementation of Quick Clearance in Michigan was completed in 2012. The study conducted a survey of Michigan registered drivers to determine their knowledge of the safe, quick clearance laws in Michigan. The study also created a campaign on how best to disseminate the safe, quick clearance laws to Michigan drivers. The Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Action Team, a part of the Governor’s Traffic Safety Advisory Commission (GTSAC), has seven Specific Measurable Actionable Realistic and Time-bound (SMART) goals. One of the SMART goals uses the baseline number from the previous study showing 13 percent of Michigan motorist know about the Steer It, Clear It law. The primary goals is: Through a targeted public education campaign, increase awareness of the Steer It, Clear It Law amongst the public from 13 percent to 50 percent by December 31, 2016.

Michigan has also been very active with TIM in the years following the pervious study. Activities have included implementation of the Mi-TIME/SHRP 2 National TIM training program, passing of Hold Harmless legislation, formation of the TIM Action Team, and more. An assessment of next steps for Michigan to take to further the TIM Program will be done in this research. Included in the next steps is a toolbox for first responders to wear the required high visibility garments, roadway design elements for TIM, next steps for the Steer It, Clear It campaign, and the review of contracts/relationships with towing companies. A recommendation of where MDOT should invest in safe, quick clearance programming to get the highest return on the investment will be included in the report. 1. Updated review of new literature and any other studies that may have been published after the pervious study.2. Conduct an updated survey of Michigan driver’s knowledge of the Safe, Quick Clearance Laws.3. Assessment of the current TIM Program and next steps for the program.4. Develop a toolkit for safe, quick clearance outreach and high visibility garments.5. Develop a list of investments that will enhance safe, quick clearance for the roadway system.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Project started the updating task of reviewing new literature. The major focus during the 3rd and 4th quarter of fiscal year 2016 was planning, organizing, and conducting regional workshops to gather information about what has been going well and to determine where opportunities exist for improvement for Michigan’s TIM program. Workshops conducted or planned: Conducted:

• Marquette – September 13, 2016• St. Ignace – September 14, 2016• Gaylord – September 15, 2016• Kalamazoo – September 19, 2016• Grand Rapids – September 20, 2016• Saginaw – September 21, 2016• Lansing- September 23, 2016

Planned: • Detroit- October 24, 2016

56

The regional workshops held were a great tool for gather thought of the first responder community. Many great things are being done in Michigan and there were areas of opportunities captured during the workshops too. A Visioning Session was planned and scheduled to be held on October 26, 2016.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES Plan regional workshop (to be held on October 24, 2016) in Detroit. The Investigator will be taking the notes from the workshops to review regional and statewide items, which will be detailed in the final reports. The executive level Visioning Session will be held on October 26th. This session will focus on building a strong foundation that has been set through extensive training, along with establishing a shared vision for the future of Michigan’s TIM program. Activities will encourage open sharing on where we go from here, together. The Visioning session will include multi-discipline leadership from across the state.

The public survey will also be held after the first of the calendar year. Review of questions asked in the last research project will be done along with preparing new questions for the survey.

The toolkit will also be developed for high visibility vest and public outreach for the TIM laws.




57


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: An Evaluation of Michigan's Continuous Count Station (CCS) Distribution


PROJECT MANAGER: Larry Whiteside


RESEARCH AGENCY Western Michigan University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Jun-seok Oh




PURPOSE AND SCOPE Michigan's traffic monitoring program has a need to evaluate site placement appropriateness and develop recommendations on the Michigan Department of Transportation’s (MDOT's) Continuous Count Stations (CCS) locations and potential relocation. This evaluation needs to consider the new traffic volume data from the 501 Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) sites, Road Weather Information System (RWIS) sites, and any other available sources including private sector sources. Seeking strategic plans that allow the monitoring program to enhance the pool of traffic information, reduce any possible data collection redundancy, and expand the sampling on roads. Pavement condition is also a consideration when determining if a site can be placed. Therefore, the scope of this projects includes confirming that MDOT's CCS sites are located on road segments which benefit the monitoring program for cost savings and additional data needs, and determining if these others sources of traffic should be folded into the Traffic Monitoring program. We will also look at how the two systems sites overlap.


Project initiated with the Kickoff meeting held on April 21, 2016, during which the research team reviewed the scope of the project and discussed with the RAP members their expectations. It was confirmed that Michigan’s traffic monitoring program has a need to evaluate site placement appropriateness and develop recommendations on MDOT's continuous count stations locations and if they should be relocated.

Staff and the research team discussed how ITS system overlaps could be used to replace and supplement the current CCS network. Western Michigan Staff then presented their project plan as to how they will carry out their research to meet the objectives. They will be conducting a literature search regarding where similar uses of ITS and other data sources have been incorporated into traffic monitoring programs.

September Quarterly Meeting Western Michigan Staff perform a literature search regarding where other DOT’s have used of ITS and other data sources as part of a traffic monitoring program. They reported the findings during the meeting. They conducted the planned survey of other states and how those DOT’s are using ITS and other data sources, along with how they manage reliability and use. They also discussed their research strategy along with several maps of locations where ITS sensors and the CCS locations overlapped. They also covered the data that will be needed to begin the next phase of analyses.

Task 1) Literature review and Survey (Completed) August of 2016, a draft of the survey questions was provided to the RAP members to evaluate. The members responded with comments to the questions and provided a list of DOT members from other states that would provide potential benefits to the research, commented on questions and provided possible peer states to contact to be included in survey.

The survey was sent out during the month of September 2016 and responses were tabulated. The survey results were presented during the September 29th meeting, covering the findings on how other states are using ITS and other data sources along with how they manage reliability and use.

58

Task 2) Data collection and building data sets, conduct evaluation of ITS and CCS data. (Initiated during FY 2016) The purpose of this task is to evaluate the data from the 501 ITS site locations, RWIS, MSP weigh stations, and other sources against monitoring program location for quality as a valid source for volume, speed, classification, hourly factors, daily factors, Design Hour Volume (DHV), and the development of seasonal factors. Acquire data from ITS and other programs. Evaluate the number and locations of the existing CCS locations.

- Review reliability issues with data from these data sources when compared to CCS data.- Can volumes and speed be used to meet Traffic Monitoring Guide (TMG) standards?- Are ITS sensors reliable for classification data and if so, how should they be monitored?- Can these sources be used for development of seasonal factors?- Can we access Oakland County’s Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic (SCAT) System and what value would that

provide to the statewide monitoring program?- Identify in what conditions and purpose ITS and other data could be used for traffic monitoring.- Identify factors that would contribute to reliability issues (i.e.: Congestion or geometric designs).- How could RWIS weather databases be used to estimate traffic reliability during adverse conditions?

They have proposed to do this in two stages. First, they plan to evaluate using GIS locations of the CCS and the ITS sensors locations to evaluate for overlap. The second part is to evaluate ITS and CCS data separately in an analysis, which is scheduled to started in FY2017


Task 2) Complete acquisition of data, build data sets, conduct evaluation of ITS and CCS data, and analyze the data. Evaluate the data from the 501 ITS site locations, RWIS, MSP weigh stations, and other sources against monitoring program location for quality as a valid source for volume, speed, classification, hourly factors, daily factors, Design Hour Volume (DHV), and the development of seasonal factors. Acquire data from ITS and other programs. Evaluate the number and locations of the existing CCS locations.

- Review reliability issues with data from these data sources when compared to CCS data.- Can volumes and speed be used and meet TMG standards?- Are ITS sensors reliable for classification data and if so, how should they be monitored?- Can these sources be used for development of seasonal factors?- Can we access Oakland County’s SCAT System and what value would that provide to the statewide monitoring program? - Identify in what conditions and purpose ITS and other data could be used for traffic monitoring.- Identify factors that would contribute to reliability issues (i.e.: Congestion or geometric designs).- How could RWIS weather databases be used to estimate traffic reliability during adverse conditions?

Task 3) Recommendation Development Recommend locations from the ITS system where new traffic monitoring sites could be placed (at existing ITS facilities) that would enhance and allow for the removal of existing CCS locations. Report how MDOT would need to build the linkages between the ITS and other data source(s) to take advantage of the resources.

Task 4) Implementation Plan Based on redundancy of CCS with ITS sensors and possible risks associated with the use of other sources, the research team will provide a year-by-year implementation plan along with ways of validating the monitoring performances. The implementation will be aimed to minimize potential problems when incorporating data from other sources.

Task 5) Final report and presentation The objective of this task is to prepare material needed to document the evaluation results, research findings, recommendations and the implementation plan. Presentation materials will also be compiled and delivered separately.




59


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: Implementation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Assessment of Transportation Infrastructure


PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Cook


RESEARCH AGENCY Michigan Technological University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Collin Brooks


Vendor Budget FY 2016 $102,573 Total Vendor Budget $598,525.79 MDOT Budget FY 2016 $2,000.00 Adjusted MDOT Budget $6,100.00 Vendor FY 2016 Expenditures $64,647.48 Total Budget $604,625.79 MDOT FY 2016 Expenditures $0.00 Total Expenditures $64,647.48


UAV technologies have the potential to supplement or replace traditional highway inspection approaches. Sensor devices coupled with UAVs are capable of collecting large data sets that will require automation in order to develop applications that support MDOT’s business models and decision making processes. This research will provide guidance to MDOT for UAVs, sensor technologies, and the necessary data collection/usage protocols to be functional and deployable.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Task 1A: The project team demonstrated real time First Person View (FPV) capability during thermal data collection at the Gordonville bridge on September 15th. Working with Surveying Solutions, Inc. (SSI), the team developed and began distributing data and collection results through Centrestack online web portal. For this task 100% of the planned work for 2016 was completed. The task continues in 2017. Task 1B: The project team met with John Lobbestael of MDOT & Lee Mixon of Mixon-Hill to discuss providing UAV data to the MDOT Data Use Analysis and Processing (DUAP) format requirements. Task 5A: Work began on an improved automated thermal-based delamination detection algorithm. For this task 80% of the planned work for 2016 was completed. The task continues in 2017. Task 5B: The project team assessed two bridges, South Warren Road over the Maple River in Midland County on July 26th, and Gordonville Road over Little Salt Creek in Midland County on September 15th. Spalls and delaminations were digitized into separate Graphic Information System (GIS) shapefiles. For this task 100% of the planned work for 2016 was completed. The task continues in 2017. Task 8: A Michigan Tech. Research Institute (MTRI) staff member has obtained a “Remote Pilot Certificate” from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as the new small UAV rules (Part 107). MTRI’s Section 333 exemption info was shared with MDOT and was used in the July data collection pending the new Part 107 rules that became active on August 29, 2016. For this task 100% of the planned work for 2016 was completed. The task is complete.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES Task 1A: Continued development of near real time demonstrating during collection, storage, and distribution of large data sets related to UAV data collects. Task 1B: Development and implementation of DUAP data format requirements. Task 1C: Draft the UAV Operations Guidance document by April, 2017. Draft a report that describes and recommends methods to store and distribute UAV collected datasets. Task 2: Demonstrate the simultaneous data collection from optical, thermal, video, and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) collection devices using a Bergen Quad-eight UAV as the aerial platform. This task is expected to start in April of 2017. Task 3: Select two or three pilot projects for MDOT Survey Support and demonstrate the capabilities to complete aerial remote sensing collections to meet MDOT’s mapping needs. Task 4: Starting in April, 2017, the project team will demonstrate the uses of data collection from UAVs and sensors for operations, maintenance, design, and asset management. Task 5A: The project team will continue to demonstrate and develop enhanced testing of UAV-based thermal imaging of bridge decks. This will include the purchase of a Forward Looking Infrared Radiometer (FLIR) Tau2 thermal camera and continued work on automated detection algorithms for delamination detection. Task 5B: Two more bridges will be collected during the fall of 2016, one at a construction site at the I-75 and Square Lake Road interchange and the other at Uncle Henry Road over Uncle Henry Drain. Additional bridge collections will commence in April of 2017.

60

Task 6: The project team will begin to plan training sessions for MDOT staff on the safe operation of UAVs, operation of the sensors, data collection and usage protocols, and the collection of data which meets DUAP standards. Task 7: Provide MDOT with an initial benefit/cost analysis to define a return on investment.




61

100% FEDERALLY

FUNDED PROJECTS

Sequentially Listed by Job Number

62


5307 (2011)

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORTATION POOLED FUND STUDY


STUDY TITLE: Environmental Technical Assistance Program (ETAP)

FUNDING SOURCE: FHWA OTHER (PLEASE EXPLAIN)

TPF NO. SPR 1284 (007) MDOT START DATE 10/1/2010 PROJECT NO. 115024 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2020 OR NO. OR11-009 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT

LEAD AGENCY American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) PROJECT MANAGER Margaret Barondess, 517-335-2621

CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $8,000.00 TOTAL COST (Original) $64,000.00 (Revised) (Revised)

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $8,000.00 Total Committed Funds Available $32,000.00

PARTICIPATING STATES

ABBREVIATE THE PARTICIPATING STATES. IF MDOT IS THE LEAD AGENCY, ALSO LIST THE CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE PER STATE.

Not applicable. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The Environmental Technical Assistance Program (ETAP) helps optimize the value of transportation investments by promoting sustainable solutions that reduce congestion, energy use, emissions, and life cycle costs. For the Efficiency and Effectiveness Goal, it identifies streamlining measures and supports faster, more efficient product delivery. This is the Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 annual membership fee for AASHTO’s ETAP.


MDOT supported the ETAP which supplied weekly newsletters distributed to 58 people, mostly MDOT employees. The newsletters provided current information on environmental research, policy, and procedure. This is a one-of-a-kind resource that would be difficult to replace. Membership also includes a scholarship to attend the annual AASHTO Standing Committee on the Environment.

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1. MDOT received a weekly newsletter with recent information on environmental research, regulation, guidance, and laws as they

related to transportation.• This product is shared via email to a list of 58 individuals within MDOT, FHWA, local agencies, and regulatory agency

staff.• The newsletter is a high quality product that enables staff to act quickly on new information, along with facilitating

discussions with outside entities.• ETAP also provides a scholarship for one staff person to attend the annual AASHTO Standing Committee on the

Environment meeting in Virginia Beach, Virginia.2. Deliverables that benefit MDOT include continued delivery of the newsletter throughout the next FY.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The weekly newsletter was successfully delivered via email to staff at MDOT, FHWA, local agencies, and regulatory agencies. One staff person attended the annual Standing Committee on the Environment meeting in Portland, Oregon.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Continued to distribute the newsletter via email on a weekly basis and sent one MDOT staff person to the Standing Committee on the Environment in Salt Lake City, UT. One staff member also attended a special meeting on noise impacts of transportation projects in Baltimore, MD, also paid for by this membership.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Continue to distribute the newsletter and use the scholarship to attend the annual meeting of the AASHTO Standing Committee on the Environment.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Continue to distribute the newsletter and use the scholarship to attend the annual meeting of the AASHTO Standing Committee on the Environment

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) Since this is an on-going program, a decision was made this year to extend funding to 2020. There are no revisions.

63

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION

Project expected completion in fiscal year 2020.

64


5307 (2011)



STUDY TITLE: AASHTO Engineering Technical Service Programs


TPF NO. SPR 1284 (019) MDOT START DATE 10/1/2015 PROJECT NO. 115193 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2016 OR NO. OR15-503 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT Various-Based on technical focus matter

LEAD AGENCY American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) PROJECT MANAGER Andre Clover, 517-636-6053 CONTRACTOR


FY Budgeted Funds (Original) $105,000.00 TOTAL COST (Original) $105,000.00 FY Billed Invoices (Revised) (Revised)

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $105,000.00 Total Committed Funds Available $0.00 PARTICIPATING STATES

ABBREVIATE THE PARTICIPATING STATES. IF MDOT IS THE LEAD AGENCY, ALSO LIST THE CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE PER STATE. Not applicable.

PURPOSE AND SCOPE The programs provide benefits to the member departments through the pooling of resources and expertise from across the country.

MDOT has the opportunity to support the development and continued operation of each of the following critical programs: • AASHTO Innovation Initiative/Technology Implementation Group (TIG) - $6,000• Transportation Curriculum Coordination Council (TC3) - $20,000• Snow and Ice Cooperative Program (SICOP) - $4,000• Transportation System Preservation (TSP2) - $20,000• Equipment Management Technical Services Program (EMTSP) - $3,000• National Transportation Product Evaluation Program (NTPEP) - $17,000• Highway Safety Policy and Management Technical Service Program - $10,000• Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridges and Structures Specification Maintenance (LRFDSM) - $10,000• Operations Technical Service Program - $15,000


MDOT’s financial support of the Technical Service Programs. FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

MDOT paid all AASHTO TSP’s invoices received in fiscal year 2016 to support their respective operations. FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

MDOT technical experts analyzed the benefits to MDOT of services and information shared by the respective Programs. The experts recommended the programs listed above under the Purpose and Scope section for approval. MDOT’s Director approved all recommendations to continue membership in the programs listed. MDOT experts shared technology advancements, new improvements, and championed implementation efforts throughout the Department.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES MDOT technical experts will review and recommend to the Director those TSP’s that best benefit the products and services provided by MDOT in administering its business operations.


None. SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION

Each fiscal year MDOT will review and assess the return on its investment in the above list of AASHTO TSP programs. If value is served in a particular program, MDOT will continue its contribution to that program. If value is not being served from a particular program; MDOT may choose to discontinue its contribution.

65


5307 (9/13)

RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION MDOT TRANSPORTATION POOLED FUND STUDY


STUDY TITLE: Development of a Transportation System Simulation Manual (TSSM): First Edition


TPF NO. TPF-5(176) / OR15-540 MDOT START DATE 6/1/2016 PROJECT NO. Not Applicable MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2017

COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT Chris Melson @ 202-493-3271 or [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY FHWA

PROJECT MANAGER Jason Firman

CONTRACTOR

BUDGET STATUS FY 2016 MDOT Budget MDOT Total Budget

FY FUNDS (Original) $35,000.00 TOTAL BUDGET (Original) $70,000.00 (Revised) (Revised)

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $35,000.00 TOTAL COMMITTED FUNDS AVAILABLE $35,000.00 PARTICIPATING STATES

CA (4.1%), CO (5.8%), FL (10.6%), LA (5.8%), MA (4.1%), MD (5.8%), MI (5.8%), MO (2.9%), NV (9.2%), NY (4.1%), OH (17.8%), VA (5.8%), WA (0.5%), WI (12.9%).

PURPOSE AND SCOPE The goal of this study is to improve the state-of-the-practice in traffic analysis and simulation so public agencies can make the best possible transportation investment decisions based upon high-quality traffic analyses. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) are widely used analytical tools that assess the quality of service for conventional intersections and interchanges. However, they do not assess any of the alternative designs considered in this research study. In part, this study will develop the first edition of a national, definitive guide for transportation analysis, modeling, and simulation – the Transportation System Simulation Manual (TSSM). TSSM will include five major components: (1) Basic Modeling Concepts, (2) Model Building, (3) Verification and Validation, (4) Results Analysis, and (5) Modeling Case Studies and Supplementary Material. More specifically, TSSM will include:

• Definitions (and distinction) of model scoping, building, calibration, and validation.• Recommended practices and needs for model scoping, building, calibration, and validation.• Calibration and validation objectives and target values.• Performance measurement reporting and visualization.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Benefits to MDOT) 1. The active research project underway; titled “HCM Guidelines for Alternative Intersections”, is nearing completion. Final chapters

23 & 34 (chapters on ramp terminals and alternative intersections) have been reviewed and accepted by the HCQSsubcommittee for inclusion in the 6th Edition of the Highway Capacity Manual.

2. During this period the TAC met to discussed, reviewed, and approved a new research effort to fund. This new effort will developa Transportation System Simulations Manual (TSSM). TRB formed a Task Force on simulation (AHB80T) in July 2015 tooversee the development of a TSSM. The development of the TSSM will build upon the framework outline that has beenapproved by this Task Force -- and will include five major components: (1) Concepts, (2) Model Building, (3) Verification andValidation, (4) Results Analysis, and (5) Case Studies and Supplementary Material. The TSSM project is anticipated to beawarded late September or early October 2016.

3. A research consultant was selected and a consultant/contract kickoff meeting was scheduled for October 3, 2016.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES The main tasks to be completed in FY17 include:

• Hold project kick-off meeting.• Establish project stakeholder list.• Review and complete report on the state-of-the-practice.• Obtain feedback on and complete TSSM chapter outline.• Begin drafting the critical need chapters.

66

None.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION None


67


5307 (2011)



STUDY TITLE: Research Program to Support the Research, Development, and Deployment of System Operations Applications of Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) [Old TPF-5(159)] FUNDING SOURCE: FHWA OTHER (PLEASE EXPLAIN)

TPF NO. TPF-5(206) MDOT START DATE 10/1/2012 OR NO. OR09-146 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 12/31/2016


TECHNICAL CONTACT Catherine McGhee [email protected] Phone: 434-293-1973

LEAD AGENCY Virginia Department of Transportation

PROJECT MANAGER Matt Smith, 517-636-5009

CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $50,000.00 TOTAL BUDGET (Original)* $250,000.00 (Revised) (Revised)**

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $50,000.00 Total Committed Funds Available $50,000.00 PARTICIPATING STATES


AZ, CA, FL, MI, MN, NJ, NY, PA ,TX ,UT, VA, WA, WI PURPOSE AND SCOPE

• Development and evaluation of connected transportation system large scale systems level operations applications• Support AASHTO’s Strategic & Deployment Plans• Support USDOT’s connected vehicles programs and initiatives• Work with Automobile industry on the development of vehicle-to-infrastructure applications

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Benefits to MDOT) 1. The Pooled Fund Study embarked upon the following four defined initiatives in fiscal year 2013:

• Development and review of the AASHTO Connected Vehicle Footprint and Deployment Analysis• Development of the study “Connected Vehicle Impacts on Traffic Management Center Operations”• Development of the “Use of DSRC for Road Weather Management” study• Second phase of the Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System deployment

2. Deliverables from the above four initiatives will include guidelines, operational changes, and deployment lessons learned. All ofthese items will directly benefit MDOT with implementation.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1. Completion of the development and review of the AASHTO Connected Vehicle Footprint and Deployment Analysis

MDOT is using this analysis as the framework for our Connected Vehicle deployment.)2. Completion of the study, “Connected Vehicle Impacts on Traffic Management Center Operations”

This report can be used as a guideline for MDOT Traffic Operations Centers in handling and addressing the influx of data from a connected vehicle environment.

3. Continued development of the “Use of DSRC for Road Weather Management” study4. Continued development of the second phase of the Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System program.

When completed, MDOT can use this program as a basis for Vehicle-to-Infrastructure applications in a connected vehicle environment.

5. Initiation of a project to research accuracy requirements for GPS and mapping in a connected vehicle environmentFISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

1. Completion of the “Use of DSRC for Road Weather Management” study2. Initiation and completion of the “GPS Accuracy for Connected Vehicle Applications” study3. Continued development of the second phase of the Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System program

When completed, MDOT can use this program as a basis for Vehicle-to-Infrastructure applications in a connected vehicle environment.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHEMENTS 1. Completed development of the second phase of the Multi-Modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System program2. Began an initiative to coordinate with the Society of Automotive Engineers for the development of DSRC messaging standards

68

mailto:[email protected]

3. Begin development of a project to create a standard “Basic Infrastructure Message” to be used on uniform DSRC roadside unitinstallations

4. Completion of the Phase 2 deployment of the Multi-modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System5. Began deployment of second Phase of “Using DSRC for Road Weather Management” project, which includes a deployment in

Michigan.


1. Completion of Phase 2 of “Using DSRC for Road Weather Management” project2. Substantial completion of Basic Infrastructure Message project3. Initiate project with USDOT on further Intelligent Traffic Signal work.4. Continued coordination with Society of Automotive Engineers on standards development.5. Select next round of projects


None.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION 1. MDOT will benefit from the information developed under all projects. In particular, the “Using DSRC for Road Weather Management”

Phase 2 project includes a deployment of equipment and evaluation of operations in Lansing, MI. MDOT is evaluating the Multi-modal Intelligent Traffic Signal System application for use in Michigan.

2. If this pooled fund study is approved to continue for two more years, MDOT would like to continue as an active partner state.

69


5307 (2011)



STUDY TITLE: Clear Roads Winter Highway Operations Pooled Fund



COMPLETION DATE (Revised) **

TECHNICAL CONTACT Debra Fick [email protected] Phone: 651-366-3759

LEAD AGENCY Minnesota Department of Transportation PROJECT MANAGER Justin Droste, 517-636-0518

CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $25,000.00 TOTAL COST (Original) $200,000.00 (Revised) (Revised)**



CA, CO, IA, ID, IL, KS, MA, ME, MI, MN, MO, MT, ND, NE, NH, NY, OH, OR, PA, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY, AK, AZ, DE, and SD PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This pooled fund project will maintain its focus on advancing winter highway operations nationally, but it will include a more pronounced emphasis on state agency needs, technology transfer, and implementation. State departments of transportation are aggressively pursuing new technologies, practices, tools, and programs to improve winter highway operations and safety while maintaining fiscal responsibility. This pooled fund is needed to evaluate these new tools and practices in both lab and field settings, to develop industry standards and performance measures, to provide technology transfer and cost benefit analysis, and to support winter highway safety. This project responds to research and technology transfer needs not currently met by other pooled fund projects. Existing partners make every effort to coordinate with other agencies to avoid duplication of efforts and to encourage implementation of results. Objectives of this ongoing pooled fund project will include: • Conducting structured field testing and evaluation across a range of winter conditions and different highway maintenance

organizational structures to assess the practical effectiveness, ease of use, optimum application rates, barriers to use, durability,safety, environmental impact and cost-effectiveness of innovative materials, equipment, and methods for improved winter highwaymaintenance.

• Establishing industry standards and developing performance measures for evaluating and utilizing new materials and technologies.• Supporting technology transfer by developing practical field guides and a training curriculum that will promote the results of research

projects.• Conducting cost-benefit analysis to ensure that new technologies, materials, or methods contribute to operational efficiency.• Supporting the exchange of information and ideas via peer exchanges and collaborative research efforts that provide opportunities

for maintenance specialists to share experiences related to winter maintenance.• Promoting public education and outreach related to winter maintenance and winter driving safety.• Conducting state of the practice surveys to share best practices on current operational issues. (For example: Salt shortages, level

of service requirements, or other hot button issues).Included in the Scope of work: Research reports, technical briefs, synthesis reports, field guides, specifications, PowerPoint presentations, video documentation, training materials, public safety messages, and software programs.

FISCAL YEAR 2012 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Clear Roads closed out the following projects in Fiscal Year (FY) 2012: • Mapping Weather Severity Zones• Snow Removal At Extreme Temperatures• Developing a Training Video for Field Testing of Deicing Materials

The following research projects either began or remained in progress during FY 2012: • Environmental Factors Causing Fatigue in Snowplow Operators• Cost-Benefit Analysis Toolkit - Phase II• Determining the Toxicity of Deicing Materials

70

• Development of a Totally Automated Spreading System• Understanding the True Costs of Snow and Ice Control Operations

MDOT staff will be incorporating results from some of these research projects into presentations given to our maintenance personnel at the Transportation Service Centers and contract agencies during Winter Operations Workshops in the fall.

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Benefits to MDOT) 1. The Clear Roads pooled fund study completed two research projects and several other projects commenced during the 2013 FY.

The two completed projects and their respective deliverables are described below.

Cost-Benefit Analysis Toolkit - Phase IIAn updated version of the cost-benefit analysis toolkit with enhanced features and expanded functionality to include additionalmaterials, equipment, and methods was developed.

Snow Removal at Extreme TemperaturesThe final report compiled strategies for winter maintenance during extreme cold events where salt is not an effective deicer. Thestrategies outlined in the report are currently used in other states and countries for maintaining an acceptable level of service duringcold weather.

2. Deliverables that will benefit MDOT if implemented:

Cost-Benefit Analysis Toolkit - Phase IIMDOT has already used the toolkit to help justify instrumenting our winter maintenance truck fleet with AVL/GPS devices formonitoring the activities of our fleet, reporting the hours and miles driven, and operational data such as the amount of deicing material used, amount of hours the plow blade was down, etc. By inputting MDOT specific cost data in the cost-benefit toolkit, we were ableto generate a cost-benefit (C/B) that is specific to MDOT. This C/B information was provided to management.

Snow Removal at Extreme TemperaturesSome of the strategies as outlined in the final report were incorporated into our winter maintenance training program for use by ourdirect-force garages and contract agencies.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Clear Roads pooled fund study completed two research projects and several other projects commenced during the 2014 FY. The two completed projects and their respective deliverables are described below.

Comparison of Materials Distribution Systems This is a photographic catalog of all the different types of material distribution systems identified across the country. MDOT can use this catalog to see what others across the country are using for winter material application systems and examine them for potential use in Michigan.

Environmental Factors Causing Fatigue in Snowplow Operators This project includes recommendations on some cost-effective solutions to mitigate driver fatigue and potential avenues for further research. The vendor for this project will be speaking on the subject at the 2015 LTAP winter conference. Methods to reduce fatigue is something that is important to MDOT.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Clear Roads pooled fund study completed two research projects and several other projects commenced during the 2015 FY. The two completed projects and their respective deliverables are described below.

Best Practices for the Prevention of Corrosion to DOT Equipment: A User’s Manual. This is a guide that summarizes, in layman’s terms, the best practices to prevent corrosion to maintenance equipment. The MDOT Fleet team is highly interested in the information presented in the corrosion guide and plans to incorporate it into best practice procedures for winter equipment.

Weather Severity Mapping Enhancement This includes a set of state-specific maps tailored to each member state’s interest. MDOT’s Office of Field Services has used the Michigan Winter Severity Map to show management how winter weather can impact operating costs in different parts of the state. The map was also used to convey a new winter severity measuring process that MDOT adopted.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Clear Roads pooled fund study completed five research projects and several other projects commenced during the 2015 FY.

• 14-01: Synthesis on GPS/AVL Equipment Used for Winter Maintenance (September 2016)• 13-02: Understanding the Effectiveness of Non-Chloride Liquid Agricultural By-Products and Solid Complex Chloride/Mineral

Products Used in Snow and Ice Control Operations (May 2016)• 14-10: Roadway Salt Best Management Practices (November 2015)• 14-06: Use Of Equipment Lighting During Snowplow Operations (September 2015)• 13-03: Cost-Benefit of Various Winter Maintenance Strategies (September 2015)

71

http://clearroads.org/project/synthesis-on-gpsavl-equipment-used-for-winter-maintenance/

http://clearroads.org/project/understanding-the-effectiveness-of-non-chlorine-liquid-agricultural-by-products-and-solid-complex-chloridemineral-products-used-in-snow-and-ice-control-operations/

http://clearroads.org/project/understanding-the-effectiveness-of-non-chlorine-liquid-agricultural-by-products-and-solid-complex-chloridemineral-products-used-in-snow-and-ice-control-operations/

http://clearroads.org/project/roadway-salt-best-management-practices/

http://clearroads.org/project/use-of-equipment-lighting-during-snowplow-operations/

http://clearroads.org/project/cost-benefit-of-various-winter-maintenance-strategies/

Two of the five completed projects and their respective deliverables are described below.

2- 2016 Completed Projects/Respective Deliverables:

14-01: Synthesis on GPS/AVL Equipment Used for Winter Maintenance.This project provided a current survey of GPS/AVL equipment and available functions. MDOT can use the information within this reportto help plan for the new AVL/GPS contract needed within the coming year.

14-06: Use Of Equipment Lighting During Snowplow Operations.This project provided a current practice of plow truck equipment lighting across the country. It also provides recommendations andsample specifications. The Michigan legislature recently authorized the use of green lights for winter maintenance vehicles. This reportcould be used to help MDOT develop specifications for green lighting.

Five new projects were also authorized for solicitation in FY16 (part of TPF-5(218))


FY17 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES INCLUDE: The Clear Roads pooled fund study plans to complete at least four research projects and continue several other projects during the 2017 FY.

4- 2017 Projects/Respective Deliverables:

12-04: Snowplow Operator and Supervisor TrainingThis project will provide a series of training modules that can be used for various winter operations training. MDOT could use some orall of these modules for their annual winter operations trainings.

14-03: Developing a Training Video and Manual for Best Practices and Techniques in Clearing Different Interchange Configurations andOther Geometric LayoutsThis project was extended into FY 17. It will be a 15-20 minute video that showcases the most efficient pass sequences to properly clearvarious interchange and intersection layouts. MDOT plans to use this to instruct operators on the best way(s) to safely clear variousintersection geometries.

15-03 North American Study on Contracting Snow and Ice ResponseThis project will provide a current state of practice across North America regarding the use of contracts for snow and ice operations.MDOT could use this report to help evaluate current department practices and investigate new alternative.

12-06 Plug and Play InitiativeDelivery date for this project was extended into FY 17.Establishment of this protocol will mutually benefit Clear Roads member states and their vendors by standardizing how criticaloperational data is shared on modern snow and ice vehicles, namely between compatible Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) devicesand anti-icing/deicing Joystick and Spreader Controller systems. MDOT could use this proposed protocol to make sure that future AVLvendor products are self-certified to communicate AVL information correctly.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) During the last week in September of 2015, the TAC held a Fall Meeting. One topic discussed was that this pooled fund project needs to be closed. MnDOT plans to close the current study after FY 16. In FY 2017, a ‘new’ TPF federal project number will be created and will carry beyond FY 2017.

All remaining study funds will transfer to the new study number and all Clear Roads project aspects will be performed in the same manner as before. MDOT has posted its commitment for FY 2017 funds to the new number. In April 2015, MDOT’s representative was voted by the TAC to lead as chair the TAC for a 2-year term until Spring 2017. Taking on this leadership role as a partner state, MDOT will be seen as a recognized national leader, leading innovation in winter highway operations.

* *A new Clear Road Phase II has been assigned, TPF-5(353: MDOT plans to extend its commitment until all current and future projects are completed and accepted by the TAC. The proposed MDOT end date is September 30, 2019. The current Clear Road Pooled Fund project (TPF-5(218)) was closed in FY2016. The balance of $25,000 that we intend to transfer to TPF-5(353). This new Clear Roads Phase II project will maintain its focus on advancing winter highway operations nationally through practical, practice-ready research related to materials, equipment and methods. State departments of transportation are aggressively pursuing new technologies, practices, tools, and programs to improve winter highway operations and safety while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION 1. Expand the use of the Cost-Benefit toolkit to justify implementation of other best practices and technologies.

2. Recommendation to RAC to use the toolkit for other practices and/or technology deployments.

72


5307



STUDY TITLE: ITS Pooled Fund Program (ENTERPRISE)


TPF NO. TPF-5(231) MDOT START DATE 10/01/2009 PROJECT NO. 111159 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 09/30/2019 OR NO. OR10-015 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT

Luke Biernbaum, P.E. EMAIL: [email protected]; PHONE: 517-636-5021

Annjanette Kremer, P.E. EMAIL: [email protected]; PHONE: 517-636-0247

LEAD AGENCY Michigan Department of Transportation PROJECT MANAGER Luke Biernbaum, P.E. CONTRACTOR Athey Creek Consultants

TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET STATUS *MDOT Project Total Budget Project Total Budget

FY 2016 MI-BUDGET (Original) $35,000.00 TOTAL COST (Original)* $2,200,000.00 (Revised) (Revised)** $2,728,970.00

TOTAL FY 2016 MDOT EXPENDITURES $0.00 Total Committed Funds Available $741,600.00

Fiscal Year Cumulative MDOT Expenditures

Project Total Expenditures

2010-2016 $ 175,000.00 $1,987,370.00

PARTICIPATING STATES ABBREVIATE THE PARTICIPATING STATES. IF MDOT IS THE LEAD AGENCY, ALSO LIST THE CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE PER STATE. SPR-II Funds: GA (7.96%), ID (7.96%), IL (11.14%), IA (9.55%), KS (18.57%), MI (13.0%), MN (9.55%), MS (3.18%), OK (4.77%), PA (4.77%), TX (7.96%), VA (1.59%). Non-SPR-II Funds: IA (5.25%), Ontario (83.81%), Netherlands (10.95%).

PURPOSE AND SCOPE The objectives of the project include the following: • Investigate and promote Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) approaches and technologies that are compatible with other

national and international ITS initiatives.• Support the individual ITS program plans of ENTERPRISE participants.• Provide a mechanism to support multi-state and international project cooperation and technical information interchange.• Facilitate the formation of public-private partnerships for appropriate program activities.• Pursue emerging ITS project opportunities in areas of interest to the group.• Provide test beds in a variety of environments and locations for emerging ITS technologies.• Identify common needs within the group and proceed with appropriate technical activities.

Scope of Work The tasks to be completed as part of the program vary from year to year, and are decided through an annual project selection process, as established by the ENTERPRISE member agencies. As a direct result of this selection process, a work plan is developed annually for the ENTERPRISE program, detailing the projects that will be pursued in the upcoming year.

Program Management and Administration • Michigan DOT received official approval from FHWA and assignment of a TPF number to accept State Planning and Research

funds for the ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund to complete the transition of the administration of the program from the Iowa DOT toMichigan DOT. We began to receive funds from member states for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010.

• A Request for Proposal (RFP) was distributed from Michigan to solicit a program management consultant for the ENTERPRISEProgram. Athey Creek Consultants was selected to provide administrative and technical project support. They were authorizedto start work on September 10, 2010.

73

mailto:EMAIL:%20%[email protected]

FISCAL YEAR 2011 ACCOMPLISHMENTS New Members Two new members joined the ENTEPRISE Program (Georgia and Mississippi) in FY 2011.

Program Management and Administration Michigan DOT received funds from the ENTERPRISE member states for their financial contributions to FY 2011.

Meetings The ENTERPRISE Executive Board held nine meetings during FY 2011. • November 8 and 9, 2010 in Phoenix, Arizona – The group discussed the background and accomplishments of the ENTERPRISE

Program, discussed program communications (program website, Wikipedia and brochures), discussed the 2011 projects in detail,and provided updates on the 2010 projects.

• January 6, 2011 Conference Call – The group reviewed the management structure of ENTERPRISE, launched a new programwebsite, and discussed the administrative details for Michigan DOT to authorize projects.

• February 3, 2011 Conference Call – The group reviewed the ENTERPRISE budget and provided comments to update theENTERPRISE management plan, charter, and operating rules.

• March 3 and 4, 2011 in Austin, Texas - The group approved the revised management plan, charter, and operating rules forENTERPRISE, discussed coordination with other pooled fund efforts, toured the Austin, Texas Combined Transportation andEmergency Management Center (CTECC), and discussed the process of developing future work plans.

• April 7, 2011 Conference Call – A summary of a Connected Vehicle Workshop in Toronto, Canada was given and the groupdiscussed the process and documentation needed to submit 2012 projects ideas.

• May 5, 2011 Conference Call – The group reviewed the submitted 2012 project ideas and discussed support for Non-ENTERPRISE business trips. Project 1 - Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions: Intersection Warning Systems wasauthorized to begin work on May 13, 2011.

• June 2, 2011 Conference Call – The group approved a document describing how ENTERPRISE would support non-ENTERPRISEbusiness trips.

• July 7, 2011 Conference Call – The group discussed the detailed project scopes for the 2012 projects, and a project update wasprovided on Project 1 - Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions: Intersection Warning Systems.

• August 28, 2011 in Coeur d’ Alene, Idaho – The group reviewed the goals and objectives of the ENTERPRISE program, finalizedthe proposed 2012 project proposals, voted on the projects, and approved the 2012 Work Plan. The group also voted on anddetermined the order of starting the approved 2010, 2011 and 2012 projects as well as developed a 2010 – 2012 Work Plan thatidentifies priorities.

Project Update for Project 1 - Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions: Intersection Warnings Systems • Project 1 was authorized by ENTERPRPRISE on May 13, 2011. FHWA agreed to provide further funding in late May to support

non-ENTERPRPRISE states to attend project workshops.• Webinar 1 was held on June 23, to compile and assess lessons learned from systems that have been developed and field-tested,

and then identify challenges with deploying such systems more permanently.• Workshop 1 was held on July 28-29, to discuss the content of a preliminary standard that builds off the challenges identified

during Webinar 1 and to develop a roadmap for reaching standardization.• Participants have included ENTERPRISE states (ID, IA, KS, MI, MN and WA), other states that have deployed systems (MO, NC,

PA, ME and WI), FHWA, NCUTCD, AASHTO and NACE.• Workshop 2 was held on September 15-16, to review the preliminary standards (guidance) proposed for MUTCD consideration,

develop an evaluation framework that may be used in future deployments for experimentation, and discuss plans for futureexperimentation and coordination.

FISCAL YEAR 2012 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Administrative/Management: Nine conference calls were held in FY 2012. Two in-person meetings were also held in this FY: One in Kansas City, Missouri in conjunction with the ITS Heartland Annual Meeting, and one in Biloxi, Mississippi in conjunction with the National Rural ITS Conference. Due to the MFOS system FY end process, funding obligations for FY 2012 were not performed; FY 2012 and 2013 transfers will be made during FY 2013.

Projects: Low-Cost ITS Safety Solution System: Intersection Conflict Warning Systems Project Goal: Develop a consistent approach for accelerated, uniform deployment and further evaluation of intersection warning systems, and to recommend preliminary standards for MUTCD consideration

• Final Design and Evaluation Guidance for Intersection Conflict Warning System was distributed on December 16, 2011.• Contacts have been made with several organizations (FHWA MUTCD, 2012 ATSAA Convention and Expo, Evaluation

of Low Cost Safety Improvements pooled fund, Traffic Control devices pooled fund) in the roadmap for standardizationof ICWS.

• Project completed. The final report is available at: http://enterprise.prog.org/projects.html

74

http://enterprise.prog.org/projects.html

Impacts of Travel Information on the Overall Network Project Goal: To understand the impacts of travel Information dissemination (at what thresholds of travel times do more travelers begin to divert) on the overall operations of an urban transportation network.

• Project was authorized by ENTERPRISE on October 20, 2011.• A project kick-off meeting was held during the November 3, 2011 monthly ENTERPRISE conference call. The group

discussed the project concept: compare volume and travel times at selected locations in Minneapolis/St. Paul and Seattle and survey travelers to learn how they use travel time displays and how and why they divert.

• A draft of the data collection plan was completed.• A draft traveler survey was developed and reviewed by the ENTERPRISE Board at the January 2012 monthly board

meeting. The survey will be modified for each ENTERPRISE state that would like to distribute the survey.• Surveys were developed and links to the Minnesota and Washington website. The purpose of the surveys is to learn

how travelers use travel time displays and how often they divert and why they divert.• Project completed. The final report is available at: http://enterprise.prog.org/projects.html

Understanding Utilization of 3rd Party Data and Information Project Goal: Document the experiences of public agencies with using 3rd party data and learn from the 3rd party providers.

• Project was authorized by ENTERPRISE on October 20, 2011.• A project kick-off meeting was held during the November 3, 2011 monthly ENTERPRISE conference call. The group

discussed the project which includes identifying public agencies with 3rd party data experience, identifying 3rd party dataproviders and then identifying what the ENTERPRISE members would like to learn from each other and from theproviders. This will be accomplished through webinars and/or in-person discussions.

• A survey was developed and distributed on January 9, 2012 to the ENTERPRISE states to gather interests and focus ofthe project. The feedback from the ENTERPRISE members was used to develop a Data Collection Plan for presentingthe 3rd party data as part of this project. The Data Collection Plan was distributed on 1/23/12.

• Each ENTERPRISE state with 3rd Party Data experience shared information at the March 28 and 29, 2012ENTERPRISE in person meeting.

• 3rd Party vendors were contacted in order to gain an understanding of the private sector perspective in providing data.A summary of 3rd Party vendor information was shared at the March 28 and 29, 2012 ENTERPRISE in person meeting.

• Project completed. The final report is available at: http://enterprise.prog.org/projects.html

The Next Era of Traveler Information Project Goal: understand how real-time traveler information technology and use is changing and how the changes are impacted by current and emerging trends with dissemination mechanisms and data management practices.

• Project was authorized by ENTERPRISE on March 2, 2012.• A survey was developed and distributed to the 511 Deployment Coalition contacts to gather high-level information about

the current state of practice with real-time traveler information programs around the country. The information wassummarized and shared, along with a detailed project schedule, during the ENTERPRISE annual meeting on March 28-29.

• Highlights of the survey and an overview of the project was presented during the ITS Heartland conference on March27, 2012

• Continued the information exchange of the project by scheduling webinar speakers on the following topics: dissemination tools, cost management, customer needs and wants, data management, and performance targets.

• Webinar 1 was held on 8.16.12. Over 20 states participated in the first webinar featuring trends in dissemination toolsand practices in the states of Washington and Wisconsin.

• Webinar 2 was held on 9.13.12. It featured cost management practices – specifically sponsorship –in the states ofGeorgia and Missouri. It also featured a brief update on USDOT’s effort to define a data exchange format for Real-TimeSystem Management Information Programs.

ICWS Coordination and Systems Engineering – Phase 2 Project Goal: An extension of Project 1, this project will further support the standardization of ICWS by coordinating among the various national standards and association groups, and by developing a concept of operations and system requirements for the four types of ICWS identified in the Design and Evaluation Guidance for Intersection Conflict Warning Systems.

• AASHTO SCOTE passed a resolution to recommend NCUTCD establish a task force, to assess ICWS work by the threepooled funds, and to endorse “Design and Evaluation Guidance for Intersection Conflict Warning Systems.” Theresolution will proceed on to the Standing Committee on Highways and AASHTO Board of Directors for final approval inNovember.

• Following the recommendation from AASHSTO SCOTE, the NCUTCD Regulatory/Warning Sign Technical Committeecreated a task force on ICWS. The task force will determine what may be needed for ICWS in the MUTCD.

• An email update was distributed to the group of ICWS stakeholders on 7.13.12 highlighting SCOTE and NCUTCDmeeting outcomes and ENTERPRISE plans to develop a draft concept of operations in July.

• Draft concept of operations was developed and reviewed with stakeholders by webinar on 9.11.12. An overview of thedraft and comments was shared with the ENTERPRISE board on 9.19.12.

75



FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Administrative/Management: Eight conference calls were held in FY 2013. Two in person meetings were also held, one in Phoenix, Arizona in conjunction with an AASHTO-sponsored meeting to evaluate the re-establishment of the 511 coalition, and one in Saint Cloud, Minnesota in conjunction with the National Rural ITS Conference.

Projects: All remaining projects from the 2010-12 Work Plan were started during FY 2013. Two additional projects were completed as follow:

The Next Era of Traveler Information Over the last decade, 511 telephone and web services have been deployed in many states and provinces. Some agencies have already deployed ‘second-generation’ 511 systems with the intent of adding functionality, improving content or reducing operating costs. Agencies are also expanding their dissemination of real-time traveler information using push services like Constant Contact and social media tools like Twitter. Many agencies have also developed partnerships to reduce operating costs through sponsorship or outsourcing. It is increasingly challenging to plan, evaluate, operate and enhance real-time traveler information services because of limited resources, overwhelming information and rapidly changing dynamics.

The ENTERPRISE Transportation Pooled Fund sponsored this project – Next Era of Traveler Information – to help agencies understand how real-time traveler information technology and use is changing and how the changes are impacted by current and emerging trends.

Emphasis was placed on sharing lessons learned by agencies that have experience related to current trends. The areas of interest that were explored during this project are described as follows.

• Dissemination tools. The project facilitated an exchange of experiences with push information services and socialmedia to help agencies understand new options for delivering information without relying on incoming phone calls. Inaddition to describing the tools being used, agencies described their philosophy and goals for traveler information toprovide a context for how their dissemination tools support them.

• Data management. Managing the availability, variety and formatting of a growing number of data sources creates acomplex environment for delivering traveler information. The project explored data requirements outlined in the Codeof Federal Regulations, Title 23: Highways, Part 511—Real-Time System Management Information Program (23 CFR 511) and the data format specifications being developed by USDOT to support the exchange of information fromhighway and transit monitoring systems.

• Cost management. Managing traveler information program costs continues to be challenging, particularly withincreasing demands for information to be timely, accurate and delivered in a variety of formats. The project supporteda peer exchange of alternative funding approaches, specifically sponsorships, to manage and optimize the costs ofoperating traveler information services.

• Customer needs. Understanding and meeting customer needs in an era when information is a premium commodityis especially problematic in government culture where market research is still rarely used to understand customerneeds. The project facilitated a discussion of how agency approaches to understanding customer needs andpresented findings from a nation-wide study conducted by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program tounderstand what information and services travelers find most useful.

• Performance targets. A key feature of the 2012 legislation, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21),is the establishment of a performance- and outcome-based program that will encourage states to invest resources inprojects that will make progress toward national goals. The project facilitated an exchange of information about states’ approaches to establishing practical performance measures and targets for traveler information programs, particularly as they relate to meeting requirements in 23 CFR 511

A copy of the final report is available from the ENTERPRISE website at: http://enterprise.prog.org/projects.html

Use and Impacts of Camera Images and Other Displays of Traveler Information The overall objective of this project was to understand the use and impacts of camera images and other “unverified” displays of information that can be interpreted by travelers, especially when compared to the use of “verified” reports such as traffic maps, incident reports, and other information that is formulated and/or verified by agencies. Results from this project could be used by agencies to help make decisions about what types of information to display and whether or not to increase/decrease current displays (e.g. add more cameras for display to the public). The focus of the project was on traveler information websites hosted by transportation agencies. A public survey, analysis of web usage statistics, and interviews with agency staff were used to inform project findings.


FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Administrative/Management: Nine conference calls were held in FY 2014. Two in person meetings were also held in FY 2014, one in San Antonio, Texas and one in Branson, Missouri in conjunction with the National Rural ITS Conference.

76



Projects:

All remaining projects from the 2010-12 Work Plans were completed during FY 2014.

ICWS Coordination and Systems Engineering In the previous ICWS ENTERPRISE effort, Developing Consistency in ITS Safety Solutions – Intersection Conflict Warning Systems, the project concluded with a preliminary design guidance and an evaluation framework for intersection conflict warning system (ICWS) deployments. The project engaged several national standards groups and industry associations including the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, AASHTO Subcommittee on Traffic Engineering, and the Traffic Control Devices and Evaluation of Low Cost Safety Improvements pooled funds.

This project furthered supported the standardization of intersection conflict warning systems by coordinating among the various national standards and association groups, and by developing a concept of operations and system requirements for the four types of ICWS identified in the Design and Evaluation Guidance for Intersection Conflict Warning Systems. A copy of the final report is available from the ENTERPRISE website at: http://enterprise.prog.org/projects.html

Next Generation Traffic data and Incident Detection from Video (Video Analytics Evaluation) The objective of this project was to conduct “proof of concept” evaluation to document the potential for Video Analytics as a tool for traffic operations centers (TOCs) and for traffic data collection. The project reported results from testing of several Video Analytics Systems in the United States (Iowa, Missouri) and in Ontario, Canada, under real-world environments. Components of the project evaluation included:

• Traffic Data Collection - Compared Video Analytics outputs to trusted agency detectors, for traffic volumes, speeds, and vehicle classifications.

• Incident Detection – Compared Video Analytics alerts to still images, video clips, and agency-reported incidents, to validate accuracy for detection of incidents including stopped vehicles, debris in the road, and slow traffic/congestion.

• Wrong-Way Vehicle Controlled Test – Conducted a controlled test to test the ability of Video Analytics systems to detect wrong-way movements on freeway ramps.

• Observations from Agency Staff: Representatives from participating agencies provided feedback on the value and usefulness of the Video Analytics systems to assist with managing road networks.

Results indicate that Video Analytics is ready to support a number of operational uses in its current state of practice. The final report includes several use case scenarios, along with procurement guidance and readiness of the state of practice to support each scenario tested as a part of this project. Lastly, a number of lessons learned are documented, which agencies can use as they plan for and procure Video Analytics systems.


Transitioning ITS Warrants to a Permanent Home This project builds off a series of projects (ITS Warrants - Phase 1 and Phase 2) that have been conducted by the ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund Study to develop preliminary warrants for ITS devices. The warrants were designed to assist agencies with deployment decisions and site selection. ENTERPRISE continues to test and refine the warrants while exploring industry acceptance for the concept. The overall approach to developing the ITS warrants was modeled after the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) warrants for traffic signal installations.

Ideally, the ENTERPRISE Program envisioned that a National or International agency would embrace the concept of technology device warrants and carry the concept forward in order to support traffic engineers for years to come. In order to move towards this vision, ENTERPRISE approved this project “Supporting the Transition of ENTERPRISE ITS Warrants to a Permanent Home”. The objective of this project was to document activities ENTERPRISE had conducted as owner and maintainer of the warrants to assist in identifying potential organizations for transitioning the warrants to a new owner. As ENTERPRISE documented the details of each task that was involved with owning the warrants, a number of options were suggested as potential organizations to transition the ownership and maintenance of the warrants. However after the ENTERPRISE Board reviewed the different options for one organization to maintain the warrants, it was agreed that ENTERPRISE should continue to own and maintain the warrants and partner with organizations to review the warrants. This approach was based on the understanding that it would be easier to find agencies willing to review and comment on one or more warrants periodically than it would be to find an organization willing to accept the entire workload of all the warrants. Given this, ENTERPRISE as part of this project developed a warrants review process to assist with review and modifications of the warrants. A copy of the final project summary is available from the ENTERPRISE website at: http://enterprise.prog.org/projects.html

Crashworthiness and Protection of ITS Field Devices Many Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) deployments include signs and other traffic control device displays that require locating them and other ITS components within the roadway clear zone. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) requires these devices to be crashworthy.

Agencies wishing to deploy ITS devices within the clear zone are responsible for ensuring that the device is either protected by a longitudinal barrier or mounted on a breakaway support in a configuration that is crashworthy. The ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund Program completed a research project to document available resources to assist state, provincial, and local agencies in the process of designing and deploying ITS devices in the clear zone. The final report summarizes the large number of resources available from federal and state agencies.

77

http://www.enterprise.prog.org/Projects/2010_Present/developingconsistency.html

http://www.enterprise.prog.org/Projects/2010_Present/developingconsistency.html


http://www.enterprise.prog.org/Projects/2010_Present/nextgenerationvideo/ENT_VideoAnalytics_Report_Sept2014_FINAL.pdf


http://enterprise.prog.org/Projects/2002_2009/itswarrants.html


http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/

A copy of the final project summary is available from the ENTERPRISE website at: http://enterprise.prog.org/projects.html

HAR – Best Practices and Future Direction Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) is a communication tool that has been used since the late 1970s by government organizations to deliver public information over short ranges by radio. Systems typically consist of a transmitter, antenna, recording device and power. Most modern systems use control software and wireless communication options that allow messages to be recorded or activated remotely. HAR is often used by departments of transportation, in particular, to deliver information about road conditions, construction and other traffic conditions.

The overall intent of this project was to provide ENTERPRISE member states with guidance to help them better understand how they should pursue HAR technologies and approaches in the future. To accomplish this, the project goals of the project were defined as follows:

• Goal #1: To help members understand how HAR is being used by transportation agencies today;• Goal #2: To help members understand the potential value of HAR; and• Goal #3: To help members understand the current and potential future state of HAR technology practices.

The final document for this project presents a general background of HAR, a summary of HAR uses and value, as well as the state of HAR technology and operational practices. Information for this project was gathered through literature reviews and interviews with transportation agencies operating HAR and manufacturers of HAR systems.


Intelligent Work Zones – Synthesis of Best Practices The ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund Program initiated a project to document the resources available as well as uses and benefits regarding the following Intelligent Work Zone (IWZ) technologies: queue warning systems, dynamic merge systems, alternate routes and variable speed limits in work zones. A detailed literature search was conducted to summarize work zone materials available related to the four work zone technologies. In addition, intelligent work zone representatives from transportation agencies were contacted to provide details on recent related deployments and provide input to the project.

The purpose of the final report is to understand the current status of work on IWZ activities by combining the resources gathered through a literature search with the information collected from the transportation agencies on recent deployments. Also included is a summary of the four IWZ technologies, including examples of successes, any guidance possible when technologies are most effective, and the configurations that demonstrated the best results. Separate documents were then created from the final report highlighting the summary of uses and benefits for each IWZ technology as a quick reference for the specific technology of interest.


Connected Vehicles Data Element Concept of Operations This effort examined the opportunities for state DOT’s to improve highway operations and safety through the use of Connected Vehicles sourced data. This included the following:

• Compiling a list of data elements• Surveying state DOTs to determine which of these data elements could be useful for incident detection, incident

management, traffic management, winter maintenance, special events management, EMS dispatch, and 511 entry. Also the surveying w state DOT representatives on preferred locations for IntelliDrive roadside equipment.

• Prepared a high level Concept of Operations that describes the data elements available from Connected Vehicles, the acquisition of the data from network servers, and the options for integrating the relevant vehicle sourced data into existing ITS software applications.


Assessment of Emergency Service Providers Data Feeds ENTERPRISE established a working relationship with General Motors’ OnStar during the Multi-Jurisdictional Mayday (MJM) project in the late 1990s to explore how automatic collision notification (ACN) technology could enhance roadway safety and traveler information if data from such systems were available to emergency medical staff and transportation agencies. In the years since, OnStar has worked diligently with the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials (APCO) and the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) to establish parameters around the crash data that they can provide. Using those parameters, OnStar has published a data stream for emergency services and transportation agencies to use.

In addition to the safety and convenience services offered by OnStar, similar services are being offered by other automobile manufacturers. For example, Ford provides a service called SYNC that literally syncs your mobile phone with your vehicle to provide various safety functions, and Hyundai offers Assurance Connected Care as a standard feature for three years on most of their new vehicles. Insurance companies are also providing similar safety and rate reduction services such as In-Drive offered by State Farm.

Given the evolution and potential value of crash notification technology, this project researched the current data available from OnStar and similar telematics service providers, suggested the value of such data for transportation operations, and worked with ENTERPRISE member agencies to understand how they could use this type of data. This summary report provides information

78





https://www.onstar.com/web/portal/home?g=1

http://www.enterprise.prog.org/Projects/1995_2002/mjm.html

http://www.apcointl.org/

http://www.nena.org/

http://www.nena.org/

http://www.ford.com/syncmyride/

https://www.hyundaiusa.com/assurance/connected-care.aspx

https://www.in-drive.com/sf/

about the data currently available from telematics service providers and suggests the potential value of such data for transportation agency operations.


FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Project 15: ITS Warrants Review Support

• December 2014 – An update on the project tasks was provided during the monthly board meeting. A conference callwas held with FHWA on December 17 to discuss planning guidance for connected vehicles.

Project 16: Investigating Distribution Mechanisms for ENTERPRISE Technical Products • December 2014 – Overall project findings and recommendations were presented during the December monthly Board

meeting call. The proposed action plan was revised per comments received during the meeting. The draft project summary report was distributed to Board members on December 16.

Project 17: ICWS Support and Outreach • December 2014 – An overall schedule of project activities was prepared and shared during the December board meeting.

December 2014: Authorized the following three (3) studies-

• Project 19: Performance Measures and Reporting• Project 21: Traffic Safety and Traveler Information Mobile Apps• Project 22: Communications to Support Rural ITS

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Administrative/Management: The ENTERISE role of Program Administrator and the MDOT role of Project Manager was transitioned from Lee Nederveld, to Luke Biernbaum. Luke will not only serve as the Program Administrator/Project Manager, but also as the lead technical member for MDOT. Board Meetings were held monthly throughout FY16, via webinar, to discuss administrative updates as well as active project updates. On August 25th an all-day in person board meeting was held in Bloomington, Minnesota.

Projects: Project 18: Countermeasures for Wrong Way Driving on Freeways (Wrong Way Vehicles on Freeways) Project Purpose: Create a matrix of wrong way systems being tested and developed by building off previous related projects and research. The matrix will include details of the wrong way system (e.g. location of wrong way system, type of system deployed, data being collected). The project will also track research results of each deployment. By tracking the deployments, this project will seek to understand which approaches have the greatest impacts, which are socially acceptable, and which have institutional issues. Project Status:

• August 2015 - July 2016 – Conducted several interviews with agency contacts to collect additional details such as design drawings, standards, lessons learned and any evaluation results that were available. Finalized Deployment Summaries and routed them to agency contacts for verification of information documented.

• July 2016 - Conducted additional interviews with agency contacts to collect final details for deployment summaries.• August - September 2016 - Obtained final verification from agency contacts on deployment information, prepared the draft

report and routed it for review.• October 2016 – Completed all project deliverables


Project 20: Integrating ITS with Planning and Ops (ITS Operational Plans & ITS Resources & Decision Tree for Planners Project Purpose: This project will assess what guidance exists for including ITS in operational plans. Such guidance can be used to describe the placement of IT devices, who will operate, maintain and own them, and how the devices will be used in daily or other operational scenarios. Project Status:

• October 2015 – Reviewed results of TSMO workshops held by FHW in 2014. Began preparation of Tech Memo 2.• November 2015 – Finalized Tech Memo 2 which recommended direction for the remaining project tasks.• December 2015 – Developed approach for decision support tool that will be created to support ITS/TSMO in the planning

process.• January/February 2016 – Presented decision support tool approach to Project Champions and Wayne Berman (Planning for

Operations Program) and discussed additional options.• March 2016 – Presented decision support tool approach to ENTERPRISE board. Agreed to focus on one TSMO areas

(traveler information) and develop tool with additional emphasis on selecting operational objectives and corresponding strategies. Began developing tool content.

• April 2016 – Continued development of tool content for Traveler Information and presented to champions on April 14.Champions approved approach and continued development. Scheduled meeting to review progress with USDOT Planning for Operations staff on May 4.

79



• May 2016 – Reviewed progress with USDOT on May 4. Continued development and reviewed further progress with champions on May 17. Developed plan for finalizing tool, conducting outreach and completing the project by August.

• June-July 2016 – Completed draft of tool and reviewed with champions on June 21. Scheduled and issued invitations forreview webinar on August 4.

• August 2016 – Conducted outreach via review webinar on August 4. Summarized results and reported to ENTERPRISE board at in person meeting in Bloomington, Minnesota.

• October 2016 – Completed all project deliverablesA copy of the final report is available from the ENTERPRISE website at: http://enterprise.prog.org/projects.html

Project 23: ITS at International Borders Project Purpose: This project will provide members with a summary of current and emerging practices for the use of ITS technologies at international borders. Project Update:

• October 2015 – Project Authorized 11.8.15• November 2015 – Project Kickoff. Project team members identified and the first project team meeting was scheduled for

December 10.• December 2015 – Prepared and held first project team meeting on December 10.• January 2016 – Prepared content (agenda, meeting guide) for information gathering webinars.• February 2016 – Conducted 2 information gathering webinars to gather input for the northern US border and the southern

US border on traffic management current practices.• March 2016 – Scheduled second Project Team meeting to review input received during the information-gathering webinars

and begin to discuss a format for sharing current practices.• April 2016 – Held second Project Team meeting to discuss topics and potential formats for sharing current practices.• May 2016 – Began planning format for sharing current practices.• June 2016 – Developed webinar agenda, identified and invited speakers and distributed invitation to the first webinar on July

26 on Data Collection and Uses at International Borders.• July 2016 – Conducted July 26 Webinar on Data Collection and Uses at International Borders. Began planning for second

webinar.• August 2016 - Held second webinar focused on agency coordination practices at international border crossings.• September 2016 - Prepared the draft report and routed it for review• October 2016 – Held final project wrap up webinar


Project 24: Portable Travel Time Displays and ICM with Parallel Routes – Phase 1 Project Purpose: To support Phase 1 of this effort to develop a project plan and system engineering documents to be used in future phases of deployment. Project Update:

• January 2016 – Project Authorized 1.20.16• March 2016 – Project kicked off during March in person meeting in Irvine, California.• April 2016 – Started ConOps development. Presented issues/challenges and needs were presented during the April Board

Meeting.• May 2016 – Continue work on ConOps.• June 2016 – Distributed draft Operational Concept and Functional Requirements for feedback.• July 2016 – Presented draft Operational Concept and Functional Requirements document during the July board meeting.• Next Steps – Finalize Operational Concept and Functional Requirements document. This project will be finished by

12/31/2016.

Project 25: The Future of DMS Messaging Project Purpose: To support the ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund members to research and document Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) uses and appropriateness of DMS demands. Project Update:

• January 2016 – Project Authorized 1.20.16• February 2016 – Conference Call held with Project Champion to review project scope.• March 2016 – Project kicked off during March in person meeting in Irvine, California.• April 2016 – Started online research of related studies, DMS requests and DMS policies.• May 2016 – Continued online research.• June 2016 – Presented DMS policies and guidelines including DMS requests and uses as well as prohibited messages during

the June board meeting. Also presented a list of related studies and DMS future uses.• July 2016 – Began preparing summary document of research conducted and preparing draft survey and/or interview

questions.• August 2016 – Finished online research summary document and finalized survey questions for the project.

80



• September 2016 – Distributed survey questions for response• Next Steps – Compile survey responses. This project will be finished by 12/31/2016.

Project 26: Integrate Active Work Zone Notifications into Traveler Information Dissemination Systems Project Purpose: To support a first phase of the project to develop ‘model’ systems engineering documents (Concept of Operations and System Requirements) that ENTERPRISE agencies could use when implementing solutions to integrate active work zone notifications into current Traveler Information dissemination systems. Project Update:

• January 2016 – Project Authorized 1.20.16• February 2016 – Conference call scheduled with Project Champion to review project scope.• March 2016 – Project kicked off during March in person meeting in Irvine, California.• April 2016 – Created a one-page project summary. Invited ENTERPRISE members to join the project team and to suggest

other project team members from their agencies. Began conducting initial research on existing similar systems and state ofpractice of arrow board devices.

• May 2016 – Conducted and summarized research into similar system integrations that convert active/changing field device statuses (e.g. weather data from RWIS stations) to traveler information. Summarized current and future capabilities of arrow board devices, noting challenges to be addressed during the project.

• June 2016 – Convened the project team, which consists of 12 individuals from ENTERPRISE agencies with expertise in work zone operations, ITS, TMC operations, and traveler information. Held a project team webinar to review project objectives and tasks, research findings, and scenario discussion topics.

• July 2016– A project team webinar was held on August 10, to step through scenarios and collect input to generate system needs and operational concepts.

• August 2016 - Held a project team workshop on August 23 in Minneapolis, prior to the in-person Board meeting. During the workshop, the project team provided input on the draft stakeholder needs and discussed scenarios related to use of archived data for planning and performance management of work zones. A presentation and demonstration of an aftermarket device to interpret arrow board statuses and convey the resulting information was provided by Street Smart Rental.

• September 2016: Incorporated comments from the project team workshop and began preparing the Model Concept ofOperations document.

• Next steps – Finalize Model Concept of Operations and hold a project team webinar to review the document. This project will be finished by 2/28/2017.

Project 27: Policies, Laws and Agreements for the Use of Fiber Communications Project Purpose: To support preparing a summary of resources (policies, laws, agreements) on the use of fiber communications at transportation agencies and to highlight best practices for sharing fiber infrastructure. Project Update:

• January 2016 – Project Authorized 1.20.16• February 2016 – Conference Call held with Project Champion to review project scope.• March 2016 – Project kicked off during March in person meeting in Irvine, California.• April 2016 – Started online research of polices, laws and agreements.• May and June 2016 – Continue online research.• July 2016 – Conference Call held with project champion to review research gathered and draft interview questions.• Next Steps – Finalize online research, survey recipients and draft survey questions. This project will be finished by

12/31/2016.

Project 28: Demonstrate and Evaluate Communications to Support Rural ITS – Phase 2 Project Purpose: Evaluate commercially available products for sending full motion video over cellular. Research practices for checking operability of rural field devices remotely. Project Update:

• January 2016 – Project Authorized 1.20.16• February 2016 – Conference Call held with Iowa DOT personnel, to begin documenting current and expected deployments

of products for streaming video over cellular, which will be evaluated during the project.• March 2016 – Project kicked off during March in person meeting in Irvine, California. Demonstrations coordinated from

Qvision and LiveView for April ENTERPRISE Board Meeting.• April 2016 – Organized demonstrations from Qvision and LiveView, which were provided to members at the

April ENTERPRISE Board Meeting. Continued to document test deployments in Iowa as they are being deployed.Documented a list of six use cases for how DOTS would use products for transferring full motion video from rural trafficcameras. Each case documents associated operational requirements. These use cases will serve as a basis for the criteria tobe developed in the evaluation plan.

81

• May 2016 – Shared use cases summary with ENTERPRISE Board and project champion to collect input.• June 2016 – Drafted an evaluation approach, data needs, and metrics based on the defined use cases.• July 2016 – Met with the project champion to discuss the draft evaluation plan.• Next Steps – Finalize documentation of test deployments as they are deployed. Finalize the evaluation plan, building on use

cases to outline criteria for evaluating the products. This project will be finished by 2/28/2017.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Administrative/Management: At the August 25th in person Board meeting, the ENTERPRISE Board members voted to sunset the current TPF-5(231) and advertise a new TPF with MDOT continuing on as the lead state. All of the current participating states agreed to participate in the new TPF and continue on with their current contributions. The new TPF is currently out for solicitation. Once the new TPF is established, MDOT will advertise a RFP for an administrative consultant to assist the ENTERPRISE polled fund with conducting their research.

Projects: USDOT/FHWA Connected Vehicle Pre-Deployment Guidance Documents FHWA asked the ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund to complete eight connected vehicle pre-deployment guidance documents. The work will be completed by the ENTERPRISE Pooled Fund, but 100% funded by FHWA. The work will be complete over 24 months and will begin once the new TPF is established and the dollars are transferred to MDOT.

Other 2017 Projects The ENTERPRISE Board Members have prepared draft scopes of work and voted on the following projects. Depending on the amount of funding available, these projects will begin once the new TPF is established.

• Maintenance of ITS in Rural Areas• Peer Exchange Webinars• Assess Speed Data for TM• Phasing out Legacy ITS• Automated or Assisted Classification of Winter Driving Conditions• Integrate Active Work Zone Notifications into Traveler Information Dissemination Systems - Phase 2• Common ATMS Concept of Operations and Requirements• Active Traffic Management - Different Use Cases and Benefits• Shared Use of CV Roadside Units• Portable Travel Time Displays and Traffic Assessment - Phase 2

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) The original budgeted amount of $175,000.00 was for FYs 2010-2014 at $35,000.00 each FY. The revised budget amount increased to $350,000.00 to cover FYs 2015-2019 at $35,000.00 each year.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION 1. There are many lessons to be learned from these research projects that could be used by MDOT, now and in the future. Specifically,

there are several recommendations from the Next Era of Traveler Information project that could influence the direction MDOT takeswith new enhancements to the Mi Drive website, the possible development of a Mi Drive app, and other traveler informationinitiatives.

2. When taking over as the administrative agency in FY 2010, MDOT committed to participating in ENTERPRISE for five years.Although this is the final year of that initial five-year commitment, it is strongly recommended that MDOT continue to be an activepart of the ENTERPRISE program, contribute to the program at current levels, and continue to serve as lead agency.

82


5307



STUDY TITLE: Transportation Library Connectivity and Development


TPF NO. TPF-5(237) MDOT START DATE (FUNDING) 05/01/2011 OR NO. OR13-017 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (FUNDING)* 09/30/2018

PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT Renee McHenry [email protected] Phone: 573-522-1948

LEAD AGENCY Missouri Department of Transportation

PROJECT MANAGER Alexandra Briseno, 517-373-8548

CONTRACTOR

BUDGET STATUS FY 2016 MDOT Budget Total MDOT Budget

FY FUNDS (Original) $0 TOTAL BUDGET (Original) $25,000.00

(Revised) (Revised)

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $0 Total Committed Funds Available * $25,000.00 PARTICIPATING STATES

ABBREVIATE THE PARTICIPATING STATES. IF MDOT IS THE LEAD AGENCY, ALSO LIST THE CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE PER STATE. AZ, CA, CT, IA, ID, IL, KS, LA, MI, MN, University of Minnesota-Center for Transportation Studies, MO, MS, NC, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, OR, PA, TN, WA, WI, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Alaska University Transportation Center (AUTC)

PURPOSE AND SCOPE Traditionally, a small group of libraries have been responsible for providing information services within the transportation community. They have managed collections while supporting practitioners and decision-makers. Yet today, a vast amount of industry information is not collected or posted to the internet without a management plan. User research habits are also changing. Recognizing this, a national effort has been made over the past five years to advocate for the development of improved library and information centers.

Unfortunately, stakeholders have been hampered by time and funding constraints. To overcome these constraints, this Transportation Pooled Fund (TPF) supports and evaluates collaborative library development. It also enhances existing efforts to develop a national transportation information infrastructure using Transportation Knowledge Networks (TKNs).

While facilitating coordination among federal, state, academic, and private sector libraries, this study provides technical and promotional support. Moreover, it capitalizes on previously developed networking initiatives to implement research tools and analyzes their effectiveness. Library services can be supported locally, but collaboration allows for shared problem solving and resources, as well as potential time and cost savings through best practices, defrayed costs, and collective purchasing power. All of these things are critical in an era of real-time communication.

FISCAL YEAR 2011 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Transportation Pooled Fund started on April 1, 2011, and the Fiscal Year (FY) ends December 31, 2011. Special projects are underway for individual member libraries in New Mexico, Illinois, and North Carolina to catalog important transportation information and research resources so that they are accessible to researchers and decision makers. The pooled fund lead consultant has coordinated all phases of the project planning and subcontracting.

Group special projects were selected. Through these projects, members will pursue the development of a return on investment assessment strategy for transportation information services, develop a unified web presence for the regional TKNs, host email lists for the Eastern TKN and the Western TKN, develop a new acquisitions awareness tool to help librarians share resources and plan collection development more effectively, and a project has been selected to investigate and acquire a multisite license to a research tool of the Transportation Advisory Committee’s choice. Using pooled funds to pursue these projects will benefit the study partners and the wider transportation information and research community by increasing access to research tools and materials, improving communication and collaboration, and enabling librarians to allocate resources more effectively for their departments.

Website development has been ongoing to provide members and the transportation library community a central place to access important project information and monitor happenings in the on the TKN landscape. All members and partners are registered users of the WordPress site and many are participating in the collaborative features of the site.

83


Essential subscription access was maintained by pooled fund payments to On-Line Computer Library Catalog (OCLC), Inc. These subscriptions are indispensable tools for librarians in providing services to department researchers and decision makers. The FY 2011 annual meeting was planned and took place on October 19, 2011, as a four-hour web-meeting with featured speakers and a business meeting.

FISCAL YEAR 2012 ACCOMPLISHMENTS • Create and implement a National TKN marketing plan that coordinates National Transportation Library (NTL), NTKN, regional

TKNs and the pooled fund• Investigate and coordinate special project for subscription access for Oregon DOT (individual member project) and group

access to selected resource. Evaluation of resources within budget will begin at the FFY2011 annual meeting;• Continue developing and updating the Web site, develop project resources and librarian resources page, develop statistical

reporting tool• Continue facilitating subcontracting process and managing selected individual member and group projects• Coordinate development of partnership and project scope with NTL on selected project, RFP and subcontract• Facilitate development of ROI project with project team, develop RFP and subcontract• Implement cataloging subscription tools at agreed upon consortium pricing with the Library of Congress• Begin planning FFY2012 annual meeting on location• Continue management of OCLC subscriptions and payment of invoices• Schedule and plan FFY2012 quarterly TAC teleconferences with continuing education and networking opportunities

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS • Added the University of Alaska - Transportation Research Center as a new member.• Manage marketing campaign of ASCE Library with materials and other promotions. Run quarterly usage reports and distribute

to TAC, post in ‘Members Only’ section of website.• Completed special project: Proving Your Library’s Value: a Toolkit for Transpiration Librarians was published in January.

2013.125 print copies were disseminated among members, partner organizations and other transportation libraries andinformation centers. An announcement / press release was sent to TRANLIB-L and the AASHTO RAC list with a link to theweb version (PDF), which is prominently displayed on the project website at: http://libraryconnectivity.org/files/Proving-Your-Librarys-Value.pdf

• Continued developing website, new content includes more licensed content behind the password on the Members Only page(trials, workshop registrations, ALA materials, presentations), new pages for Outreach and Marketing and Administrationresources and project and librarian resources pages; promoted RSS feed and technical support with feed readers.

• Conducted a free 45-day trial of EBSCO EBooks for Engineering.• Continued facilitating and managing selected individual member and group projects, including subcontracts and vendor

relations.• Provided travel support documentation for requests for out of state travel and expenses to 75% of the membership.• Set up subscription and paid invoice for the RDA Toolkit, an essential cataloging tool to work within new RDA guidelines for

bibliographic records. The subscription is a companion to existing subscriptions to Cataloger’s Desktop and ClassificationWeb, also provided through the pooled fund. (Vendor: American Library Association)

• Held quarterly TAC meeting on March 21, 2013. Provided professional development session: EBSCO EBooks for Engineering– product demonstration and Q&A session. The regular business meeting also took place.

• Attend regional TKN meetings, chairs meetings and TLCat committee meetings.• Developed collaborative opportunities with new members and partner agencies. Continuing project with NTL for New

Acquisitions list with assistance from WisDOT staff and lead team member AZDOT.• Consulted with TAC on pooled fund hosting of the NTKN Cataloging Workgroup’s wiki and NTKN web site. TAC voted and

approved. The wiki data has been moved to the UW-Madison server. It has not gone live, per a pending decision by theWorkgroup.

• Special Projects: New projects for FY13 team meetings held.• Cataloging: NM, IL, NC – all contracts renewed by HS InFocus LLC

- Multistate Cataloging – conducting a search for a professional cataloger for subcontract;- Report Documentation – discussing best avenue to desired result (this may entail another subcontract);- Report Distribution - discussing best avenue to desired result (this may entail another subcontract);- Marketing Toolkit – scoped, outline complete, shu design retained for layout and graphics;- Reference Tracking Tool – began investigating software/subscription products currently on the market.- TKN Web Project – KKL Info contract was renewed, new KM calendar project scoped.

• Continued development of the Marketing and Outreach toolkit. Sections were sketched out and team members were assignedresponsibility for development.

• Purchased group access to the ALA Web seminar The DIY Patron: Library Instruction at the Point of Need as a professionaldevelopment opportunity for members. The recorded session and materials are permanently available behind the passwordon the Members Only page on the project website.

• Selected host sites for FY2013 annual meeting – the pooled fund meeting will take place at The Commons Hotel on theUniversity of Minnesota campus. A draft agenda has been distributed to members and we have secured a block of rooms atthe Missouri state rate at The Commons Hotel.

• Continued managing selected individual member and group projects, including subcontracts and vendor relations.• All registration, travel and reimbursements for the Special Libraries Association annual meeting in San Diego was completed.

The conference was June 9-11, 2013. • Provided travel support documentation for requests for out of state travel andexpenses to 75% of the membership. A pooled fund meeting was held on June 10 to discuss the annual meeting agenda inthe Twin Cities.

• Continued website enhancements, including project documents, updates and librarian resources and other resources. 84

http://libraryconnectivity.org/files/Proving-Your-Librarys-Value.pdf

http://libraryconnectivity.org/files/Proving-Your-Librarys-Value.pdf

• Held a June quarterly TAC meeting on 6/19/13. Special topic: SLA takeaways to help us do serve our customers better andhelp our departments fulfill their missions.

• Held the Annual Meeting on September 18-19th in the Twin Cities, MNFISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Meetings & Professional Development • Quarterly TAC meeting, 3/20/14. Special topic: Data curation and the libraries’ role in compliance with the OSTP data policy.• Quarterly TAC meeting, 6/19/14. Special topic: 2014 Special Libraries Association Conference.• Quarterly TAC meeting, 12/19/14. Special Topic: MnDOT Library Valuation Study• Members attended the Special Libraries Association Annual Meeting and Conference in Vancouver, BC. June 8-10, 2014.• Annual Meeting, Ann Arbor, MI, September 8-9, 2014. Special Topics: LibGuides Workshop, Data Curation, Connected

Vehicle Technology.

Library/Research Resources • Product trials for standards with vendors IHS, Techstreet and ASTM to provide engineers with optimal access to standards in

their work at a significant negotiated discount by leveraging the size of our group.• LibGuides subscription was purchased for the membership. http://guides.libraryconnectivity.org/index.php• NTKN working group wikis are being hosted on our domain, www.libraryconnectivity.org, at the request of the National

Transportation Knowledge Network, regional TKNs and approval by the NTKN Steering Committee and the TPF-5(237) TAC.Two wikis have been developed.

• Data Management: http://libraryconnectivity.org/datamgt/index.php/Main_Page (live, public)• Cataloging: http://libraryconnectivity.org/catwiki/index.php/Main_Page (live, not public yet)• Cataloging Resources

- Cataloger’s Desktop, Classification Web (Library of Congress) – subscriptions renewed, paid with pooled funds.- RDA Toolkit (American Library Association) subscription renewed with pooled funds. These tools assist librarians in creating

standards compliant bibliographic records for increased access to library resources (print and digital) and as part of thecollection management aspects of running a library.

• Continued ASCE Library product marketing and renewals for participating members receiving consortium discount.• Continued CMS website development, including project documents, updates and librarian tools and other

resources. http://www.libraryconnectivity.org.

Special Projects • Improvement of research report distribution and access and promotion of more effective use of Technical Report

Documentation page, USDOT Form 1700.7 will be complete by 30 September, 2014 by subcontractor, Transanalytics.• KM Calendar project: Phase I – design, build – complete. http://clients.robotkittendesigns.com/events (temporary URL). The

calendar will be deployed in Phase I with a video tutorial and accompanying user guide.• Connecticut DOT Library website – built with pooled funds. http://ctdotlibrary.org/• Cataloging Projects:

- Illinois – 2,190 TRB Highway Research Records series and Transportation Research Records.- North Carolina - 292 total: Original = 49; Copy = 243

• Multistate Cataloging – Complete.o Michigan – 106 total: Original = 49; Copy = 57o Minnesota – 103 total: Original = 103; Copy = 5o California – 404 total: Original = 304; Copy = 100o Idaho – 300 subject headings into Excel.o New York – 11 total: Original = 11; Copy = 0

• TKN Brochures were completed and will be distributed among members for marketing the value of library services. Links:o MTKN - http://www.mtkn.org/sites/default/files/MTKNBrochure.pdfo ETKN – Not published on website.o WTKN- Not published on website.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Meetings & Professional Development • Quarterly TAC meeting, 12/18/14. Special Topic: New York Library Association Library Innovation Award – Jane Minotti, 2014

Recipient• Quarterly TAC meeting, 3/19/15. Special topic: Library Transformation: Strategies for Laying out a Path Forward.• Quarterly TAC meeting, 6/24/15. Special topic: 2015 Special Libraries Association Conference.• Some members attended the Special Libraries Association Annual Meeting and Conference in Boston, MA. June 14-16, 2015.• Annual Meeting, WebEx, August 17-18, 2015. Special Topics: Geek Squad for Libraries, Open Access Compliance,

EOS/SirsiDynex Demo

Library/Research Resources • The Springshare LibGuides subscription was continued for the second year for the

membership. http://guides.libraryconnectivity.org/index.php - 13 LibGuides have been created. • NTKN working group wikis are being hosted on our domain, www.libraryconnectivity.org, at the request of the National

Transportation Knowledge Network, regional TKNs and approval by the NTKN Steering Committee and the TPF-5(237) TAC.

85

http://www.libraryconnectivity.org/

http://guides.libraryconnectivity.org/index.php

• Two wikis that were developed last year are still in use.o Data Management: http://libraryconnectivity.org/datamgt/index.php/Main_Page (live, public)o Cataloging: http://libraryconnectivity.org/catwiki/index.php/Main_Page (live, public)

Cataloging Resources • Cataloger’s Desktop, Classification Web (Library of Congress) – subscriptions renewed, paid with pooled funds.• RDA Toolkit (American Library Association) subscription renewed with pooled funds. These tools assist librarians in creating

standards compliant bibliographic records for increased access to library resources (print and digital) and as part of thecollection management aspects of running a library.

• Continued ASCE Library product marketing and renewals for participating members receiving consortium discount.• Continued CMS website development, including project documents, updates and librarian tools and other

resources. http://www.libraryconnectivity.org

Special Projects • The Eastern Transportation Knowledge Network (ETKN) published the Transportation Sustainability

Guide: http://guides.libraryconnectivity.org/sustainabletransportation• Funds were used to buy a copy of the book “Data Management for Researchers” for each Pooled Fund agency.

Cataloging Projects: • Illinois – 2,190 TRB Highway Research Records series and Transportation Research Records still in progress• North Carolina – Over 3,000 items have been cataloged

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS This TPF study was on the FY 2016 SPR-II Program. However, no funds were transferred nor were any expenditures realized in FY 2016 that were chargeable to MDOT. As of September 30, 2016 all objectives were met through quarterly meetings and reporting’s. The project is complete; however, current state DOT members are in discussions regarding whether to continue the work in a new pooled fund.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES No activities planned.


*The remaining balance of MDOT’s original [FY’s 2011-2015] funding commitment level is zero. MDOT programmed $5,000 eachfor FY’s 2016-2018 to cover; if needed, a new project solicitation in 2016. As of FYE 2016, no decision has been determined bythe TAC regarding a continuation of the existing project or solicitation of a new project. MDOT will continue to budget/programthe federal funds so as to cover for a placeholder in anticipation a new Transportation Pooled Fund program project will beimplemented soon.


If this is the last year of MDOT participation; please note implementation recommendations resulting from the study that MDOT plans to incorporate into an implementation action plan to improve the operations or how we do business.

The MDOT Library will continue to use all tools (LibGuides, Data Management, RDA Toolkit, and the Cataloger’s Desktop) made available through previous project initiatives. These tools are helpful in reducing human resources time to perform research literature reviews/searches and improves the number of research outlets that can benefit MDOT employees with their research needs. The list serve will still be utilized to give the MDOT Library and other DOT Libraries a way to reach out and collaborate with their peers.

86

http://www.libraryconnectivity.org/

http://guides.libraryconnectivity.org/sustainabletransportation


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: Highway Safety Manual Implementation




TECHNICAL CONTACT Ray Krammes LEAD AGENCY FHWA PROJECT MANAGER Stephen Shaughnessy CONTRACTOR



TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $20,000.00 TOTAL COMMITTED FUNDS AVAILABLE $60,000.00

PARTICIPATING STATES ABBREVIATE THE PARTICIPATING STATES. IF MDOT IS THE LEAD AGENCY, ALSO LIST THE CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE PER STATE. CA,ID,IL,KS,KY,LA,MI,MO,MS,NC,NJ [listed w/o pledged contributions],OH,OK,OR,PA,UT,WA,WI,WV

PURPOSE AND SCOPE The objectives of the study are (1) to advance ongoing efforts by lead states to implement the HSM, and (2) to expand implementation to all states. This study would be coordinated with other ongoing and planned implementation activities sponsored by AASHTO, FHWA, and TRB, including NCHRP Project 17-50 "Lead States Initiative for Implementing the Highway Safety Manual" It will also be coordinated with projects that develop content for future editions of the HSM including NCHRP Project 17-45 "Enhanced Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges" NCHRP Project 17-54 "Consideration of Roadside Features in the Highway Safety Manual" and Transportation Pooled-Fund Study TPF-5(099) "Evaluation of Low Cost Safety Improvements."

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS o A finalized list of State-adapted HSM Part C spreadsheets based upon input from State representatives was developed

for posting at the CMF Clearinghouse.o A finalized a list of State developed or calibrated SPFs based upon feedback from State representatives was developed

for posting at the CMF Clearinghouse.o A preliminary analysis comparing State developed SPFs and State calibration factors was conducted for HSM SPFs as a

first step in an evaluation of the feasibility of a “quick and dirty” method that States could use to determine whether anexisting SPF may be suitable for use in the State without calibration

o The “Model State Policies and Procedures for Use of HSM” contractor delivered the draft final report on June 13, 2016.State representatives and FHWA staff provided review comments on July 5, 2016.

o The “Scale and Scope of HSM Implementation in the Project Development Project” contractor delivered the 3rd draft of thefinal report on June 19, 2016. State representatives and FHWA staff review comments are due July 15.

o Held a virtual quarterly business meeting on May 16, 2016.o Please list those deliverables that will benefit MDOT if implemented. The payoff from participating in this pooled-fund

study is minimizing duplication of efforts by all the states and maximizing our resources based on national priorities ofdelivering products that support the implementation of the HSM.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Development of more ready to use spreadsheets for common Safety Performance Functions (SPF).Develop technical guidance for states to develop SPF

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S)

None SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION

Note implementation recommendations resulting from 2016 accomplishments that MDOT may consider for implementation immediately. Please include necessary next steps to begin development of an MDOT implementation action plan (I.e. hand-off to MDOT committee/subcommittee, FAM, RAC, etc.). • Develop and/or confirm approved list of Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) for MDOT use.• Update the HSM spreadsheet based on results of current Safety Performance Function (SPF) research and utilize

methodology being developed for MDOT for updating the SPFs.87


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: Accelerated Performance Testing for the NCAT Pavement Test Track


TPF NO. TPF-5(267) MDOT START DATE 4/15/2015 PROJECT NO. MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2017 OR NO. OR15-520 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT Michelle Owens, 334-353-6942 [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY Alabama DOT

PROJECT MANAGER Curtis Bleech, 517-322-5769 [email protected]

CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $330,000.00 TOTAL BUDGET (Original) $990,000.00 (Revised)* $660,000.00 (Revised)



AL, CO, FL, GA, IL, KY, MN, MO, NY, NC, OK, SC, TN, VA, and WI PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This is a partnership to address National needs for research in Pavement Preservation and Asphalt Mixture Performance Testing. The National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) is partnering with MnROAD for the first time in the 2015 research cycle to execute pavement preservation and asphalt mixture performance testing experiments with a nationwide implementation impact. Research sponsors will have decision making authority on the targeted use of the funding they provide, meaning that states can choose which facility (either NCAT or MnROAD) will be the focus of their research investment. It is expected that many treatments/pavements will be studied at both locations. Background information on the scope of the NCAT/MnROAD partnership is provided as an attachment. Positive experiences with implementable findings that reduce the life cycle costs of pavements and facilitate rapid deployment of sustainable technologies have made past research at both NCAT and MnROAD an outstanding investment for numerous state DOTs. The yield will broaden the scope of implementable findings, while at the same time expand the capabilities of both facilities on complementary research through close collaboration. The scope of work for the pooled fund project will include: 1. Hauling materials to the project from offsite locations. Material donations are typically secured by state sponsors, while reasonable

hauling expenses are handled by the pooled fund.2. Rebuilding sections in accordance with sponsors’ directives via competitively bid subcontracts administered by NCAT. It is

anticipated that equipment rental, aggregate hauling, liquid asphalt supply and delivery, plant production, and mix placement may all be procured via competitively bid subcontracts. Additional preservation treatment sections will be applied to a nearby highway as well as at the MnROAD test facility.

3. Installing both environmental (i.e.: multi-depth pavement temperature probes) and response instrumentation (e.g.: high speed stress and strain gages) in new experimental sections.

4. Operating a 5-truck heavy triple-trailer fleet on the NCAT test oval in order to apply accelerated truck traffic following the completion of construction. Actual human drivers operate the vehicles in order to provide realistic vehicle wander.

5. Measuring field performance each week when the fleet is parked to fully document the changes in surface condition as a function of traffic and temperature. High-speed pavement response will also be measured on a weekly basis in structural sections. Surface friction will be measured on a monthly basis. Performance will be measured on off-Track pavement preservation sections on at least a monthly basis.

6. Conducting laboratory testing to quantify basic material and mix performance properties, which will serve as the basis of performance model development.

7. Comparing predicted and measured pavement response, as well as predicted and measured cumulative pavement damage, in order to validate then calibrate prevailing M-E methodologies and to quantify the life extending benefit of various pavement preservation alternatives

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Benefits to MDOT) Conference call meetings to discuss and select the roads in Minnesota to perform the treatments on, and selecting the various treatments to be applied. MDOT had direct input on the sections selected.

88



FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Establishment of teams in the areas of Tech Transfer, Flexible Pavements, Rigid Pavements, Geotechnical and Preventive Maintenance in order to identify future research needs and development of long term construction plans to support research for the specific research needs. Provided technical transfer training on intelligent compaction to various entities. Construction of “Cracking Group Study” cells and “Preservation Group Study” cells.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Continued development of future research and supporting construction needs. Continued technical training/outreach. NRRA Pavement Conference in early summer of 2017. Monitoring and data gathering from constructed test cells.


*Due to the financial systems shutdowns period near FY end 2015, MDOT transferred its FYs 2015 and 2016 funds during FY 2016.SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION

Expected project completion in fiscal year 2017.

89


5307 (2011)



STUDY TITLE: Development of an Improved Design Procedure for Unbonded Concrete Overlays


TPF NO. TPF-5(269) MDOT START DATE (FUNDING) 4/13/2012 OR NO. OR14-036 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (FUNDING) 5/31/2017


TECHNICAL CONTACT Debra Fick, 651-366-3759 [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY Minnesota Department of Transportation PROJECT MANAGER Benjamin Krom, 517-322-6855

CONTRACTOR University of Minnesota BUDGET STATUS

MDOT FY 2016 Budget MDOT Total Budget

FY FUNDS (Original) $0.00 TOTAL COST (Original) $60,000.00 (Revised) (Revised)

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $0.00 Total Committed Funds Available $0.00 PARTICIPATING STATES


GA, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NC, and OK PURPOSE AND SCOPE

It is the goal of this project to develop a stand-alone national design procedure that will result in improved performance and life-span prediction of unbonded concrete overlays constructed over existing concrete or composite pavements. The procedure should be based on mechanistic-empirical principals, and developed in a way such that it could be easily adopted into future versions of the MEPDG or DARWin-ME design procedures. The new procedure must incorporate the best features from existing UCOCP designs, as well as develop improved structural and fatigue models that consider the effects from the environment and the behavior of the wide range of interlayer systems currently in use.


The participating states met via conference call and web conference on June 28, 2012, to discuss the contents of the Request for Proposals (RFP). Based on that input, the Lead Agency developed the final RFP and posted it on September 4, 2012, with proposals due by October 2, 2012.

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The contract with the University of Minnesota was executed on June 17, 2013 and began with a literature review and the creation of a database of existing unbonded concrete overlay projects.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Two Technical Advisory Panel meetings occurred via web-conference this Fiscal Year (FY), on December 16, 2013, and May 27, 2014, with the purpose of keeping all member states informed on project progress. Task 1 was completed this FY, which included a literature review of existing unbonded concrete overlay design procedures. A survey to states was also sent out and MDOT provided a lot of detailed information on our existing unbonded overlay projects as part of this survey. The research team also met with Minnesota DOT pavement experts to gather information about the historical performance of unbonded concrete overlays in Minnesota. Extensive pavement management system records and personal knowledge/experience with unbonded overlays were transferred to the research team. The University of Minnesota’s subcontract with the University of Pittsburgh was not executed until May of 2014, so the Task 2 work is behind schedule. For the laboratory testing in Task 2, the University of Pittsburgh requested that member states provide material samples for testing (concrete specimens with open-graded & dense-graded interlayer asphalt attached). MDOT has acquired concrete samples with both asphalt interlayer types, and is in the process to delivering them to the University of Pittsburgh. MDOT staff has also hosted some members of the research team (University of Pittsburgh), touring the Michigan unbonded concrete overlay projects that were of interest to them.

Website Updates: • Work continued on the development of a longitudinal cracking model, which will be used in the UBOL design procedure being

developed.• Task 2 was the major focus during July-September, 2014. The TAC members began securing/sending material samples for testing

characterization of the interlayer.• Selection of projects for supplementary non-destructive testing is underway. Some of the selected sites were visited by the research

team in 2014.

90


FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS One Technical Advisory Panel meeting occurred via web-conference this FY (June 24, 2015) to keep all member states informed on the status of the project. A lot of progress has been made on Task 2 by the University of Pittsburgh. Work consisted of laboratory testing of beam samples to characterize the behavior of various interlayer materials in relation to reflective cracking. This work was documented in a draft report submitted for review by the TAP. All Task 2 work (lab testing) is scheduled to be complete by September 30, 2015.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS One Technical Advisory Panel meeting occurred via web-conference this FY (February 22, 2016) to keep all member states informed on the status of the project, to present on the completed Task 2 (lab testing) report and the draft Task 3 (structural model development) report and findings. The research team requested that member states provide any faulting data on in-service concrete overlays. MDOT collected and supplied nearly 200 raw longitudinal profiles, collected from 1994-2015, on a sampling of in-service concrete overlays to assist the research team in the calibration/validation of their proposed faulting model. The Task 3 report was finalized in March. Task 9 (lab testing added per contract amendment #2) on the specimens cut from SR50, in Bridgeville, PA, was also completed. Using all lab testing results and other models, the research team investigated the structural behavior (deflection, cracking and faulting) of unbonded concrete overlays. The understanding of this structural behavior, as implemented in the developed mechanistic models, will form the backbone of the unbonded concrete overlay design procedure.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES The focus for the research team will be to validate the proposed mechanistic structural models of unbonded concrete overlays for incorporation into a framework for the final design procedure. This effort will include examining input parameters on a case-by-case basis. The research team plans on developing an “alpha-build” of the final design procedure and providing it to the Technical Advisory Panel to use, evaluate and provide constructive feedback to the research team for improvements. A late December 2016 TAP meeting is currently being planned. Finally, this project is expected to be completed this FY, therefore we expect to receive all the final deliverables (final report and design procedure).

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) On April 22, 2015, the contract was amended to accommodate additional testing and add time needed to complete the project. The entire project is now scheduled for a May 31, 2017 completion date. Contract amendment #2 was approved on September 14, 2016 to perform additional laboratory testing (adding Task 9 to the project), and extend the due dates for Tasks 4 and 5. The additional testing will exceed the project budget by $8,324.88. Therefore FHWA has agreed to fund this shortfall, allowing this additional work to be completed. The research team will make every effort to accomplish this additional work, as well as the remaining tasks, within the currently scheduled May 31, 2017 completion date.


Expected project completion FY 2017.

91


5307 (2011)



STUDY TITLE: Next Generation Concrete Pavement Road Map




TECHNICAL CONTACT Linda Narigon, 515-239-1471 [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY Iowa Department of Transportation

PROJECT MANAGER John Staton, 517-322-5701

CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $15,000.00 TOTAL BUDGET (Original) $75,000.00 (Revised)* (Revised)

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $15,000.00 Total Committed Funds Available $15,000.00

PARTICIPATING STATES ABBREVIATE THE PARTICIPATING STATES. IF MDOT IS THE LEAD AGENCY, ALSO LIST THE CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE PER STATE.

GA, IA, MI, OK, and PA PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This project is for the establishment of a Next Generation Concrete Pavement Road Map (Next Gen CP Road Map) to carry on the work started by FHWA’s initial Concrete Pavement Roadmap Pooled Fund, TPF-5(185), which ended in June, 2012. This initial pooled fund was developed to guide concrete pavement research investments identified as critical for accomplishing customer-driven goals. This Next Gen CP Road Map pooled fund will continue the effort to identify needed research to help the concrete pavement community meet today’s paving needs and tomorrow’s pavement challenges.

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS On a bimonthly basis, the Next Gen CP Road Map E-newsletter was developed featuring national highlights on research, including specific state Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement updates.

A continuation of the PCC pavement project database, monitoring the Transportation Advisory Council’s (TAC’s) progress towards the CP Road Map research priorities, is moving forward from the previous CP Roadmap pooled fund project.

A Next Gen CP Road Map website with general information on the road map, the 12 tracks and a library of the pooled fund deliverables is being transferred from the previous CP Roadmap pooled fun project.

The pooled fund is continuing facilitation of the Next Gen CP Road Map Track Leadership Committees, comprised of leading national experts and organized around the specific research tracks.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS • Contacted states to determine dates and topics for training.• Developed outline for PCC overlay specification.• FHWA’s contribution was added to the pooled fund. Scope was expanded to include E-new and MAP Briefs.• First E-news and MAP Brief were distributed. The MAP brief topic was “Mix Design and Proportioning for Concrete Pavements”.• The research database was updated with information gathered from state interviews.• A TAC meeting was held on January 7, 2014.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS • October E-news and MAP Brief were distributed. The MAP brief topic was “Aggregate Gradations for Concrete Pavement Mixtures”.

Link to it: http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefOctober2014.pdf.• December E-news and MAP Brief were distributed. The MAP brief topic was “Relating Transport Properties to Performance”.

Link to it: http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefDecember2014.pdf.o Coordination with Iowa DOT for development of the upcoming E-News.o Completed draft PCC overlay guide specification.o A TAC meeting was held November 25th.

92


http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefOctober2014.pdf

http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefDecember2014.pdf

• January E-News and MAP Brief were distributed. The MAP brief topic was “Producing Freeze-Thaw Durable Concrete”.Link to it: http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefJanuary2015.pdfo Coordinated with Nebraska for development of the upcoming E-News.o Continued work on the final draft of the PCC overlay guide specifications.o Completed 3D workshop training in Oklahoma in January.o Completed 3D workshops for Michigan in February.o Completed workshops on PCC pavement preservation for Iowa in March.o A TAC meeting was held on March 2nd.

• April E-News and MAP Brief were developed and distributed. The MAP Brief topic was “Concrete Pavement Curling and Warping”. Link to it: http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefApril2015.pdfo Coordinated with Nebraska for development of the April E-News.o Wrote five summaries on research projects for April E-News.

• June 2015 E-News and MAP Brief were developed and distributed. The MAP Brief topic was “Concrete Pavement Joint Deterioration”. Link to it: http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefJune2015.pdfo Coordinated with South Dakota for development of the June E-News.o Wrote five summaries on research projects for June E-News.o Continued work on the final draft of the PCC overlay guide specifications.o Reviewed the specifications with the CP Tech Center Overlay Committee.o Set up training with Pennsylvania and Georgia for fall, 2015.o Held TAC meeting on June 18, 2015.

• Finalized dates, locations, and topics for training events for Penn DOT and Georgia DOT.• Issued next new E-News and MAP Briefs.• Finalized new PCC overlay specifications.• Continued to update research database as further state interviews are completed.• Submitted a plan to NCC for support of the CP Road Map program as requested by TAC.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS • Investigate recent concrete pavement related research for inclusion in the database.• The March E-News newsletter summarized a NCC survey regarding the addition of withheld water after initial mixing. In addition,

recent research on drying shrinkage, the influence of mixing time, and internally cured pavement applications was highlighted. The newsletter is available here: http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/e-news_Mar2016.cfm

• The March 2016 MAP Brief was developed and distributed. The MAP Brief topic was Concrete Pavement Recycling and Use ofRecycled Concrete Aggregate in Concrete Paving Mixtures. Link to it:http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefMarch2016.pdf

• Work toward development of an internal curing specification.• Development of changes to the geotextile specifications.• Planned and held TAC meetings on February 16, 2016 and February 29, 2016.• Two Internal Curing webinars were held.


• Continue work on guide specifications for Internal Curing.• Issue additional E-News newsletter and MAP Brief for NCC.• Hold a TAC meeting (Date TBD).• Work on IMCP manual rewrite.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) None.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION The year to year tasks associated with this pooled fund project (Next Gen CP Road Map E-newsletter, PCC pavement project database, Next Gen CP Road Map website, Next Gen CP Road Map Track Leadership Committees) are continuing and implementation of deliverables will be disseminated accordingly. This is the first fiscal year quarter of the Next Gen CP Roadmap pooled fund project. Additional Deliverables to be prioritized by the TAC as funding allows.

93

http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefJanuary2015.pdf

http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefApril2015.pdf

http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/MAPbriefJune2015.pdf

http://www.cproadmap.org/publications/e-news_Mar2016.cfm


5307 (9/13)


ANNUAL REPORT - FISCAL YEAR 2016 STUDY TITLE: Aurora Program




TECHNICAL CONTACT Brian Worrel, 515-239-1471 LEAD AGENCY Iowa Department of Transportation PROJECT MANAGER Dawn Gustafson, 906-293-5168 CONTRACTOR



TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $25,000.00 TOTAL COMMITTED FUNDS AVAILABLE $0 PARTICIPATING STATES


AK, AZ, CA, CO, DE, IA, IL, KS, MI, MN, NY, ND, OH, PA, UT VA, WI, and Ontario Ministry of Transportation PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of this project is to: 1. Improve dissemination of road weather information to transportation providers and end users, ultimately increasing safety by reducing

potential weather‐related incidents and improving transportation safety, reliability, and mobility in both urban and rural areas.2. Improve the efficiency of maintenance operations.3. Aid in the development of technologies that seamlessly integrate to facilitate the formation of partnerships between maintenance and

operations and facilitate the dissemination of road weather information.4. Develop initiatives that assist public agencies in deploying Road Weather Information System (RWIS) technologies and

methodologies.5. Encourage greater cooperation and information exchange between transportation agencies and the other agencies and groups.6. Support development of expanded uses of RWIS technologies.

The program’s mission is to support cooperative research, evaluation, and deployment of innovative technologies that advance road weather monitoring and forecasting in highway design, construction, maintenance and operations and to serve as an international advocate for expanded uses of these technologies.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completion of project 2009-01: Summary and Comparison of Agency Experience with Sensors. This project was funded to compile a summary of various environmental sensors and the experience agencies have had with each sensor. This information will be utilized by MDOT when selecting sensor types and models. Completion of project 2007-05: Multiple Use ITS Data Collection Practices. This project was funded to summarize the previous experience of other states when combining Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), traffic devices, etc., at one location. MDOT participated in this survey and continues to strive to combine as many of these devices at one location as possible. Completion of project 2013-01: National Winter Maintenance Peer Exchange. This project was completed and finalized a gathering to allow agencies to network and share ideas and innovations. MDOT is an active participant in this meeting.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completion of project 2015-02 2015: National Winter maintenance Peer Exchange. This conference had excellent attendance. State best practices were again well received. Completion of project 2012-03: Cameras and Operational Impact of Remote Road Condition Monitoring This study in Utah evaluates the benefit of cameras in winter weather remote monitoring.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completion of project 2010-04: RWIS Sensor Density and Location MDOT is looking to expand their RWIS system and this information will be distributed to the areas within MDOT that will be placing new installations in 2017. Completion of project 2012-05: Seasonal Weight Restrictions Demonstration, Phase 1. MDOT participated to develop a project to evaluate existing data available, collect additional data, and determine models that can be analyzed to predict spring thaw. Arizona and Delaware have joined the Aurora group.

94


Peer Exchange will be planned for 2017 in Pittsburg. Aurora, Clear Roads, and SICOP meet every two years to discuss research efforts of the groups. Reduce redundancy while looking for gaps between the groups. There will be two on site meetings and several webinars where members can network and discuss RWIS related issues. This information is shared with other MDOT staff. 2014-01: Seasonal Weight Restrictions Demonstration, Phase 2. Consultant will finalize analysis of the data that has been collected for 2 years. MDOT has been providing information to the consultant. Report will be provided to Scott Greene. Aurora group will begin to evaluate how weather data will work in conjunction with Connected Vehicles. MDOT can evaluate the efforts of Iowa DOT to combine the maintenance of all ITS devices into one maintenance contract.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION Project expected completion in fiscal year 2018.

95


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: Improving Specifications to Resist Frost Damage in Modern Concrete Mixtures FUNDING SOURCE: FHWA OTHER (PLEASE EXPLAIN)



TECHNICAL CONTACT Ron Curb, 405-522-3795 [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY Oklahoma Department of Transportation

PROJECT MANAGER Tim Stallard, 517-322-6448 [email protected]

CONTRACTOR





CT, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, ND, NE, OK, PA, WI PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of this project is to establish new test methods and specifications for fresh and hardened concrete to determine frost durability and field performance. Task 1: Literature Review and Development of the Testing Matrix Task 2: Sample Preparation Task 3: Validation of the Super Air Meter (SAM) Task 4: Use of X-Ray Tomography of Air Voids and Frost Damage Task 5: ASTM C 666 Task 6: Absorption and Desorption Task 7: Degree of Saturation and Damage Development Task 8: Rate of Damage Analysis Task 9: Technology Transfer Task 10: Final Report

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Literature Review and Development of the Testing Matrix, 50% complete. Samples will be prepared at Oklahoma State University (OSU) and a subset of these mixtures will be prepared at a local ready mix plant to replicate these mixtures in the field, 10% complete. Validation of the Super Air Meter (SAM), 20% complete. Creation of an AASHTO Test Method and Specification for the Super Air Meter (SAM), 35% complete. Degree of Saturation and Damage Development, 10% complete.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Literature review and development of the testing matrix is 88% complete. Over 80 mix designs have been investigated. Preparation of lab mixes for evaluation at OSU is 45% complete. Validation of the SAM is 50% complete. Creation of an AASHTO test method for the SAM test is 70% complete. X-ray tomography of air voids and frost damage is 33% complete. Comparison of ASTM C666 freeze thaw durability testing with SAM results is 45% complete. Absorption and desorption testing is 50% complete. Determination of damage development vs. degree of saturation is 60% complete.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS As of September 30, 2016: literature review was 95% complete. Sample preparation was 85% complete. Validation of the SAM was 85% complete and included a round robin testing cycle. Creation of an AASHTO test method was 90% complete. Investigation of moisture penetration was 75% percent. ASTM C666 testing was 85% complete. Absorption and desorption investigation was 85% complete. Degree of saturation and damage investigation was 90% complete. Rate of damage examination was 50% complete. Tech transfer was 80% complete and included a webinar at the end of September to present the latest information. The final report was 15% complete.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Wrap up any deliverables that are not complete, most notably being the work with the rate of damage. The final report will be completed and delivered.

96



SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION To date, MDOT has recognized the SAM for consideration as a next generation durability-based concrete field testing device. Through the recent Roads Innovation Task Force (RITF), the SAM will be included in a QC shadow testing capacity for the 30- and 50-year design life concrete pavement demonstration projects, which are programmed for 2017 and 2018, respectively. Further, MDOT has recently applied for a STIC grant, which, if approved, will provide funding to purchase 8 SAMs along with resources for training and specification development.

A recent TPF solicitation (1439) titled “Performance Engineered Concrete Paving Mixtures (PEM)” has been posted, which includes a component for continuing research and development of the SAM technology. MDOT will consider the deliverables from TPF-5(297) to decide whether to (1) participate in this upcoming PEM project and if so, (2) promote awareness of lessons learnt from TPF-5(297) to bolster the quality of the future PEM initiative.

97


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: The Use of Bridge Management Software in the Network Analysis of Big Bridges


TPF NO. TPF-5(308) MDOT START DATE 10/1/2013 PROJECT NO. 125276 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2017


TECHNICAL CONTACT David Juntunen, 517-749-8036 LEAD AGENCY Michigan Department of Transportation PROJECT MANAGER Rebecca Curtis, 517-449-5243

CONTRACTOR Modjeski and Masters TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET STATUS

FY 2016 MDOT Budget Total Project Budget

FY FUNDS (Original) $47,500.00 TOTAL BUDGET (Original) $388,018.00 (Revised) $0.00 (Revised) $0.00

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $26,909.52 Project Total Committed Funds Available $259,778.79

Year Total MDOT Expenditures

Project Total Expenditures

2014 $0.00 $ 0.00 2015 $98.65 $ 98.65 2016 $26,909.52 $128,140.56

PARTICIPATING STATES ABBREVIATE THE PARTICIPATING STATES. IF MDOT IS THE LEAD AGENCY, ALSO LIST THE CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE PER STATE.

IA (16%); MI (21%), MN (16%), NJ (16%), NY (16%), PA (9%), and WI (8%) PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Current financial outlay plans for a network of standard bridges are managed by scheduling preservation and replacement projects based upon whole bridge needs. This is viewing element condition as an entirety for the bridge on complex, long span, or large deck bridges (Big Bridges). It may make more sense fiscally to view contiguous element groups, structure components, or bridge spans as a series of interactive networks. The AASHTO National Bridge Elements, Bridge Management Elements, and Agency Defined Elements were developed for standard structures and should be reviewed to see if the elements and their units are appropriate for the management of Big Bridges. Big Bridges are those that, because of their size, complexity, or importance, have dedicated maintenance and management staff or programs. Big bridges may include slab on girder bridges of significant length as well as other structures including suspension bridges, cable stay, trusses, movable bridges, arches, or boxes. Using element level bridge inspection data, engineers and managers of Big Bridges need to develop short, medium, and long-range preservation management plans. They must predict when partial or full replacement of elements or components are most cost effective, and they need to develop maintenance budgets, business plans, and capital outlay plans accordingly. Management of the decks of Big Bridges is of particular interest

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS This project was in a solicitation status during Fiscal Year (FY) 2014. On November 24, 2014, the project manager held an initial meeting with the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to discuss the project goals and objectives.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS MDOT updated the original problem statement after review/discussion by the TAC members during FY 2015. MDOT initiated a nationwide request for proposal during the summer of 2015. Modjeski & Masters, Inc. was selected and awarded a Research Services Contract in 2015.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Fiscal Year 2016 accomplishments included the completion of Tasks 1-4. Task 1 was the review of recent research and literature, Task 2 was the review of big bridge inspection and management reports, Task 3 was the nationwide survey of big bridge owners, and Task 4 was the review of big bridge management methodologies.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Fiscal Year 2017 proposed activities include: completing Task 5 which is the development of guidelines for the inspection of big bridges using element level data, Task 6 which will be recommendations for improvements to analytical and management software and methodologies fire big bridges, and then producing a final summary report near the end of next year to tie everything together.

98


None SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION


99


5307 (2011)



STUDY TITLE: Technology Transfer Concrete Consortium (TTCC) [Old: TPF-5(159)]


TPF NO. TPF-5(313) MDOT START DATE 10/01/2014

OR NO. OR15-002 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 09/30/2019


TECHNICAL CONTACT Linda Narigon, 515-239-1471 [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY Iowa Department of Transportation

PROJECT MANAGER John Staton, 517-322-5701

CONTRACTOR Iowa State University (PI-Tom Cackler) BUDGET STATUS

FY 2016 Budget Total Budget

FY FUNDS (Original) $12,000.00 TOTAL COST (Original)* $60,000.00

(Revised) (Revised)**



AL, CA, CO, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, LA, MI, MN, MO, MT, NE, NV, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, PA, RI, SD, TN, TX, UT, WA, and WI. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of this pooled fund project is to identify, support, facilitate, and fund concrete research and technology transfer initiatives. This pooled fund project allows for state representatives to continue the collaborative efforts of TPF-5(159) that originally began in TPF-5(066) Materials and Construction Optimization. The Technology Transfer Concrete Consortium (TTCC) is open to any state agency desiring to be a part of new developments in concrete. TTCC will meet in conjunction with the National Concrete Consortium (NCC), twice a year. NCC Bylaws and the Executive Committee membership can be found at http://www.cptechcenter.org/ncc/TTCC-NCCMeetings.cfm.


The fall 2009 meeting of the National Concrete Consortium (NCC) was held in St Louis, Missouri. The theme for this meeting was Cement Standards and Technology for Sustainable Concrete Paving and included a tour of the new Holcim Cement Plant. Approximately 80 participants from government agencies, industry, and academia, including 20 different state DOT representatives, attended. The Spring 2010 workshop was held in Savannah, GA with 85 participants. The theme for this meeting was overlays, including state reports on overlays and the new roller compacted concrete guide.

FISCAL YEAR 2011 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Spring 2011 workshop was held in April 2011 in Indianapolis, IN. Approximately 80 participants from government agencies, industry, and academia, including 20 different state DOT representatives, attended. The Fall 2011 workshop was held in Rapid City, SD with approx. 85 participants. The theme for this meeting was the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide, including state reports.

FISCAL YEAR 2012 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Spring 2012 NCC meeting was held in Oklahoma City, OK. The theme for this meeting was non-destructive testing of concrete. The fall meeting was held in Seattle, WA, in conjunction with the International Conference on Concrete Pavements. This NCC meeting provided updates on several pooled fund projects related to Task 1 of the current CP Roadmap. There were also discussions relative to a proposed future pooled fund project focused on the development of new protocol for durability-based testing and acceptance of concrete. This initiative will be further discussed in future meetings.

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Spring 2013 NCC meeting was held in Philadelphia, PA. The theme for this meeting was pavement smoothness and ride quality. The fall meeting was held in Asheville, NC. Its theme was life-cycle cost and pavement type selection. This NCC meeting provided updates on several pooled fund projects related to Task 1 of the current CP Roadmap. There were also discussions relative to a proposed future pooled fund project focused on development of new protocol for durability-based testing and acceptance of concrete. This initiative will be further discussed in future meetings. The total number of participating state agencies increased from 24 to 27.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Spring 2014 meeting was held in Jacksonville, FL on April 21-24. Topics included state reports, rethinking concrete delivery, a SHRP2 update, sustainability, bridge deck cracking, and others. The Fall 2014 meeting was held in Omaha, Nebraska on September 9-11. Topics included state reports on aggregate quality, MnRoad update, Microspheres, Quality paving, FHWA Update, pavement repairs, and others.

100


FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Spring 2015 meeting was held in Reno, NV on April 21-24. Topics included state reports on concrete curing, internal curing, performance based durability specifications, and others. The Fall 2015 meeting will be held in Milwaukee, WI on September 15-17. Topics include state report on concrete pavement joint sealing practices, There were also sessions on the Super Air Meter, Formation Factor, performance engineered mixes, FHWA Update, and others.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Spring 2016 meeting was held in Columbus, OH on April 21-24. Topics included performance engineered mixes, recycled concrete aggregate, FHWA update, roller compacted concrete, self-powered sensors for concrete, UHPC, Bridge deck cracking, and internal curing. The Fall 2016 meeting was held in San Antonio, TX on August 28 - September 1. This meeting was held in conjunction with the 11th International Conference on Concrete Pavements. Topics include an update on the CP Tech Center technical products, performance engineered mix update, and state reports. In addition, each attending state DOT representative participated in the international conference by either moderating a session, presented a topic in a technical session, or presented a poster in the poster session. MDOT presented two posters; concrete surface sealers and the US-23 Aggregate Test Road.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES The upcoming Spring 2017 meeting will be held in Salt Lake City, Utah April 24-28, 2017.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) $3,000 was approved in amendments in FY12 for a synthesis report and $7,000 was approved in the Fiscal Year (FY) 13 amended program. FY12 and FY13 budgeted funds were expended in FY13. In 2014 the lead agency requested all partner states to transfer all 2015 and beyond fund commitments from TPF-5(159) to the new TPF-5(313); Solicitation No. 1363.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION This is a continuing pooled fund study focused on being an ongoing forum to identify, support, facilitate and fund concrete research and technology transfer initiatives. It serves as a forum to transfer technology and current state of practice amongst participating state DOTs, industry, and academia. Discussions and dialogue presented often serve as a springboard for further in-depth studies and pooled efforts.

101


5307



STUDY TITLE: Transportation Management Center (TMC) Pooled Fund Study [Previously SPR-2(207)]


TPF NO. TPF-5(319) MDOT START DATE (FUNDING) 10/1/2014

OR NO. OR14-040 MDOT COMPL. DATE (FUNDING) 4/16/2018

PROJ. COMPL. DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT Jimmy Chu, 202-366-3379 [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) PROJECT MANAGER Suzette Peplinski, 616-451-8448 CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $25,000.00 BUDGETED AMT. (Original) $175,000.00 (Revised) BUDGETED AMT. (Revised)

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $25,000.00 Total Committed Funds Available* $25,000.00 PARTICIPATING STATES


CA , FL , GA , IA , IL , KS , MI , MN , MO , NC , NV , NY , PA , TN , TX , UT , VA , WA , WI PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of the Transportation Management Center (TMC) Pooled Fund Study is to assemble regional, state, and local transportation management agencies and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to (1) identify human-centered and operational issues that are common among TMC operators and managers; (2) suggest approaches to addressing identified issues; (3) initiate and monitor projects intended to address identified issues; (4) provide guidance and recommendations and disseminate results; (5) provide leadership and coordinate with others with TMC interests; and (6) promote and facilitate technology transfer related to TMC issues nationally

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Studies included: Best Practice for Road Condition Reporting Systems, Guidebook for Developing Virtual TMCs, Effectiveness of Safety and Public Service Announcement (PSA) messages on Dynamic Message Signs (DMS), Roles of Transportation Management Centers in Incident Management on Managed Lanes, and Travel Time Displays prior to Freeway Entrances. A webinar was also held: Effectiveness of Disseminating Traffic Messages on Dynamic Message Signs

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Several webinars were held on current, relevant TMC topics that MDOT staff attended. Studies included: Human Factors Guidelines for TMCs, Next Generation Traveler Information System - A 5-Year Outlook Project, and Public Perception of PSA on DMS in Rural Areas.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS TMC PFS group held quarterly conference calls to share information and update on studies. Several webinars were held (which are generally done through USDOT’s T3 program to share with a wider audience) on current topics. Studies completed this year include: TMC Video Recording and Archiving Best General Practice, Freeway Service Patrol Prioritization and Best Practice, and Travel Time Displays at Freeway Entrance Approaches. All three of these topics are of current relevance in Michigan, and have been shared with MDOT operations stakeholders. MDOT hosted the group’s Annual Meeting this year at the Southeast Michigan TOC in Detroit.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Ongoing studies include: Synthesis of Variable Speed Limit Signs and Effects of ITS Planning in Connected Vehicle Environment. Selected projects for 2017 are: Capability and Usage of Color DMS, Roadmap to Address MAP-21 Performance Measures on Highway Operations, Emerging TMC Data, and TMC Staff and Staffing contracts. Up to 3 webinars are planned for sharing of research and best practices.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION 1. Implementation Recommendations

• Travel Time Displays prior to Freeway Entrances reports are being used for a current project in West Michigan and for planning other operations throughout the state.

• MDOT staff have attended the PFS webinars and use information discussed, along with the related studies, for developing statewide guidelines and projects.

• TMC Video Recording and Archiving Best Practices will be used along with the implementation of MDOT’s statewide traffic video sharing system.

• Multiple MDOT staff are involved in the two ongoing projects to provide input and guide studies to benefit current MDOT projects with variable speed applications and MDOT’s connected vehicle programs.

102



5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: Base Funding for the North Central Superpave Center


TPF NO. TPF-5(320) MDOT START DATE 6/1/2015 PROJECT NO. MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2017 OR NO. OR15-521 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT Kevin Kennedy, 517-322-6043 [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY Indiana Department of Transportation PROJECT MANAGER Steve Bower, 517-636-7777 CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $25,000.00 TOTAL BUDGET (Original) $75,000.00 (Revised)** $50,000.00 (Revised)



IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MO, and WI PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This pooled fund project will provide for continued operation of the North Central Superpave Center (NCSC) to assist agencies and industry with Superpave implementation and hot mix asphalt issues. The NCSC will provide technical assistance, training, communication, and research and development to meet the needs of the region.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS There was a conference held in 2015 prior to MDOT committing funds. Planning for the 2016 conference is ongoing. A teleconference was held to discuss states’ experience with premature cracking on Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). Additional technical conference calls will be held throughout the coming year.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS PLEASE REPLACE WITH FY16 ACCOMPLISHMENTS. FYI- FY16 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES INCLUDED: A teleconference was held in February to discuss asphalt performance testing/balanced mix design. The 2016 technical conference was held in March in Indianapolis. Topics discussed include fundamentals of recycled shingles, rejuvenators, softening agents, REOB, durability, construction related items, verification of specific gravity, and various FHWA policies (current and future). Learning the state of the practice will help MDOT remain current with specifications and compliant with federal regulations. The NCSC will provide technical assistance, training, communication, and research and development work to meet the needs of the region.


Additional technical conference calls will be held throughout the coming year. There will be another conference held in 2017. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S)

** MDOT pledged commitments for fiscal years 2015 and 2016 [$25k each] was transferred during FY 2016 to the lead state. As such, the original FY 2015 commitment was changed to $0.00 and the FY 2016 was revised from $25,000.00 to $50,000.00 on the TPF website.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION MDOT has already implemented the use of low cracking bond coat based on testing done by the NCSC. Discussion on specific gravity verification contributed to this being implemented into our specifications for 2017. The plan is for MDOT to continue to participate in the pooled fund study so that they can participate in the North Central Asphalt Users Producer Group and continue to use the SuperPave center as a resource.

103



5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: No Boundaries Roadway Maintenance Practices


TPF NO. TPF-5(330) MDOT START DATE 5/29/2015 PROJECT NO. Not Applicable MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2017 OR NO. OR15-518 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT Melissa Howe, 517-636-4386 [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY Ohio Department of Transportation PROJECT MANAGER Steve Bower, 517-636-7777 CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $10,000.00 TOTAL BUDGET (Original) $30,000.00 (Revised)** $30,000.00 (Revised)

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $30,000.00 TOTAL COMMITTED FUNDS AVAILABLE $0.00 PARTICIPATING STATES

CT, FL, IL, LA, MI, MO, NY, ND, OH, PA, SC, VA, WA, & WI PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This project provides a forum for state DOTs to share their maintenance innovations (non-winter) with each other, support technology transfer activities and develop marketing and deployment plans for the implementation of selected innovations. The goal of this consortium is to become the premier national forum for technical exchange and collaboration related to the application of new maintenance initiatives, research and technologies.

This project will help DOTs to save time and money by not investing in the same research that has already been performed by other state DOTs. Hence rather than having each DOT identify and implement research separately, DOTs can work collectively through this pooled fund project.

Scope of Work: 1) Identify promising innovations and technologies ready for implementation within maintenance activities, developed by the participating state DOTs, non-participating DOTs and outside entities.2) Develop marketing plans for selected ready-to-deploy innovations and technologies.3) Organize training classes and pilot demonstrations about specific research topics or technologies for member state DOTs.4) Develop a searchable database where innovations and research projects developed across the country can be identified andaccessed.


MDOT joined the pooled fund and are just beginning to get involved in pooled fund activities. FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) held five (5) teleconferences on the following dates in FY 2016; 10/1/15, 11/9/15, 2/8/16, 3/31/16 and 6/1/16. One (1) face-to-face TAC meeting was held on December 10-11, 2015 in St. Louis, MO. Maintenance innovations selected by the TAC as being worthy of implementation were discussed. Planning of the next face-to-face TAC to be held on October 25-27, 2016, in Ann Arbor, MI has taken place. During the fiscal year the researcher developed an innovations submissions form anddatabase for the No Boundaries website. All posted website maintenance innovations were entered into the new database. Based onTAC member feedback the innovation submission form was revised. Substantial updates to the No Boundaries website were madeincluding new sections for asset management, maintenance management, member’s login, and roadway maintenance e-news. AYouTube channel to feature videos of members’ maintenance innovations was created.

The vendor compiled recent research and state practices to highlight in the March, April, June, and August newsletters and wrote articles about new No Boundaries resources and activities. They distributed the newsletters to TAC members and encouraged other maintenance professionals to subscribe through email and phone outreach. The vendor also conducted a national survey on asset management.

104


To support membership and recruitment; the vendor updated the No Boundaries handout, created presentation materials for use by ODOT at the May APWA North American Snow Conference, and provided talking points and updated handouts for use by ODOT at the June National Equipment Fleet Management Conference. Several new states joined No Boundaries throughout the fiscal year; thus, increasing membership to 14 states. They also created and promoted a Google Group listserv to encourage information sharing among non-winter maintenance professionals.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES • Continue to reach out to potential new members (both state DOTs and local agencies) through emails, phone calls and

presentations.• Investigate opportunities for collaboration between No Boundaries and other national maintenance-related programs and

technology transfer initiatives.• Compile the results of the survey on maintenance management systems. Analyze the results to help the TAC identify priorities

for information sharing among agencies.• Create and publish a newsletter every few months that compiles recent research, innovative practices and upcoming events in

the maintenance world, along with news about No Boundaries activities.• Maintain the website with current information about No Boundaries members and activities.• Redesign the website using a content management system and an updated design. Use more images and add elements that

better showcase the innovative practices to be shared, such as blogs and videos.• Organize and host webinars on selected innovative maintenance practices or priority maintenance topics. Compile a list of

potential topics for review and prioritization by the TAC.• Organize, facilitate and document TAC conference calls (at least every other month).• Organize pilot projects or mini peer exchanges to facilitate demonstration and technology transfer of new practices between twoor more agencies. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) ** MDOT’s original fund commitments were $10k each for FY’s 2015-2017. Due to financial system shutdown in FY 2015 no funds were transferred that fiscal year. In FY 2016 Project Accounting transferred $50k in error; lead agency refunded $20k back to MDOT. As such, a total of $30k has been transferred to the lead agency fulfilling our project fund commitments.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION Project expected completion in fiscal year 2017. The benefits to MDOT for participating in No Boundaries include: • Networking and collaboration with other DOT’s

o Provides a mechanism to communicate common issues and solutions• Clearing house for process and products

o What works, what doesn’t and what needs more investigationo Simple form to fill out and submit for members to view what other DOT’s have tried and listens learned

• Best Practices• Research new maintenance initiatives and potential research statements• Consistent maintenance activities throughout DOT’s• Alignment on policies, procedures, and specifications (minimize duplication of effort and align best practices)

o Performance Based Maintenanceo Transportation Asset Management (TAMS)o Equipment/GPS and report automation (i.e. WMT to summer equipment like spray trucks, etc.)o GISo Safetyo Shared research ideas

• Face-to-face meetings with each state in PFS

105


5307 (2011)



STUDY TITLE: TRB Core Program Activities - Period Covering Fiscal Year 2015 (TRB Fiscal Year 2016)


TPF NO. TPF-5 (342) MDOT START DATE 10/01/2015 PROJECT NO. NA MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 09/30/2016


TECHNICAL CONTACT Jean Landolt, 202-493-3146 [email protected]

LEAD AGENCY Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) PROJECT MANAGER André Clover, 517-636-7777

CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $181,766.00 BUDGETED AMT. (Original) $181,766.00 (Revised) ACTUAL COST (Revised) $180,741.00

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $180,741.00 Total Committed Funds Available $0.00 PARTICIPATING STATES


AK, AR, CA, CT, FL, IA, ID, IL, IN, ME, MI, MN, MS, MT, NC, ND, NJ, NM, OR, PA, SC, SD, TX, and WV PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The Michigan Department of Transportation provides annual financial support for the Transportation Research Board’s (TRB's) Core Program technical activities. This support helps to operate TRB annual meetings, the committee structure, State visits by TRB, and the TRB publication program.


MDOT has a representative on the TRB Executive Committee that serves as an official representative and liaison. This representative negotiates the fees and services that best serve its particular needs and provides support for the Board's programs and activities of interest to the entire transportation community.

FISCAL YEAR 2014 ACCOMPLISHMENTS • TR News

TRBs bimonthly news magazine features timely articles and state-of-the-art research and practices in all modes of transportation.• Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (TRR Journal)

TRB publishes approximately 70 volumes of the TRR Journal each year, which contain more than 900 papers grouped by subject. TRR Journals are available in print format and are also available through an online service.

• TRR Journal OnlineTRB’s TRR Journal Online website has provided 24/7 electronic access to the full text of more than 13,900 peer-reviewed papers that have been published as part of the TRR Journal series since 1996. The site includes the latest in search and analysis technology, and is updated as new TRR Journal papers become available.

• TRB Full CollectionIncludes all of the regular serial publications of TRB in print format, such as TRB books and reports covering 36 transportation functions and modes. Annually, TRB produces approximately 200 titles in its serial publications (pdf) that include the TRR Journal; TR News; Special Reports; Conference Proceedings; Transportation Research Circulars; National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Reports, Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Reports, National Cooperative Freight Research Program (NCFRP), Hazardous Material Cooperative Research Program (HMCRP), Research Results Digests, Legal Research Digests and Syntheses, Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program (CTBSSP) Syntheses and Research Results Digests; and SHRP2 Reports.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS MDOT fund contributions in fiscal year 2015 continue to support TRB’s cost of operations. This support includes, but is not limited to, TRB’s Annual Meeting, its bimonthly news magazines, the TRR Journal publications, website operations, and other annual publications printed and distributed nationwide.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS MDOT fund contributions in fiscal year 2016 continue to support TRB’s cost of operations. This support includes, but is not limited to, TRB’s Annual Meeting, its bimonthly news magazines, the TRR Journal publications, website operations, and other annual publications printed and distributed nationwide. Payment made as approved by the Michigan Department of Transportation Director, Kirk Steudle, on March 1, 2016.

106


http://www.trb.org/Finance/TRRJournalOnline1.aspx

http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/general/subscriptionlist.pdf

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTVITIES MDOT’s plan is to continue to support TRB’s cost of operations in 2017.



MDOT technical experts have access to all TRB publications to review and share internally as appropriate.

107


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: Roadside Safety Research for Mash Implementation


TPF NO. TPF-5(343) MDOT START DATE 10/1/2016 TPF- SOLICITATION NO. 1424 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2018 MDOT RESEARCH NO. OR15-528 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT Rhonda Brooks or Tim Carlile @ 360-705-7975/[email protected] LEAD AGENCY Washington DOT PROJECT MANAGER Carlos Torres and Corey Rogers CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $50,000.00 TOTAL BUDGET (Original) $100,000.00 (Revised) $0.00 (Revised)

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $0.00 TOTAL COMMITTED FUNDS AVAILABLE $100,000.00 PARTICIPATING STATES

Alaska, Minnesota, Connecticut, Oregon, California, Pennsylvania, Florida, Tennessee, Idaho, Texas, Illinois, Maine, Washington, Wisconsin, Louisiana, West Virginia, and Michigan.

PURPOSE AND SCOPE The objective of the Roadside Safety Pooled Fund Program is to provide a cooperative, cost-effective, and efficient approach to conducting research on roadside safety hardware meeting the functional needs of participating states. Emphasis will be placed on assisting State DOTs with their implementation of MASH, the transition to the use of MASH-compliant roadside safety devices in lieu of current NCHRP 350-compliant devices, as mandated in the revised FHWA-AASHTO Joint Implementation Plan, and addressing other roadside safety needs of common interest.

Another objective of this pooled fund research is to provide each participating state an opportunity to send a representative to an annual meeting to collaborate with other state DOT safety engineers to assess best practices, new regulatory issues, risk management strategies, and other matters pertaining to roadside safety. Roadside Safety Pooled Fund members will meet, review potential projects for inclusion as part of future MASH crash testing projects, develop a work plan that involves selecting projects for future MASH crash testing, and designate individuals that will serve as team leaders for overseeing these projects.

Specific research activities expected to be addressed within the program include the design, analysis, testing, and evaluation of crashworthy structures, and the development of guidelines for the use, selection and placement of these structures. Crashworthy structures include bridge railings, guardrails, transitions, median barriers, cable barriers, temporary concrete barriers, end treatments, crash cushions (impact attenuators), culverts, breakaway support structures (e.g. sign supports, luminaire supports, mailboxes), and work zone traffic control devices. In addition, research is expected to address the influence of highway features such as driveways, slopes, ditches, shoulders, medians, and curbs on single vehicle collisions.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed Projects

1. MASH Transition from F-Shape Temporary Concrete Barrier Pinned on Asphalt to Rigid Single-Slope Concrete Barrier• Test Report No. 605641-1; Test Report Date: January 2016• Benefit: Provides insight on methods to anchor temporary concrete barrier to permanent concrete barrier.

2. Guidebook for Use of Pinned-Down Temporary Concrete Barriers in Limited Space Applications• Test Report No. 605071-1; Test Report Date: April 2016• Benefit: Provides insight on an alternative limited deflection temporary concrete barrier system that meets MASH.

3. MASH Finite Element Analysis and Full-Scale Crash testing of Stacked W-Beam Transition for 31-inch Guardrail• Test Report No. 604581-1; Test Report Date: May 2016• Benefit: Provides information on a MASH-compliant guardrail anchorage that MDOT could use if desired.

Please note that MDOT joined the Roadside Pooled Fund in mid-2016, and the first Roadside Safety Pooled Fund meeting with MDOT participation is slated to take place in late October 2016. As a result, there was no input or involvement from MDOT in the three completed projects identified above.

108

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Ongoing Projects

1. Feasibility Study for Addressing Extreme Site Constraints at Bridge Ends (602941)2. Placement of Guardrail on Slopes — Phase III (603221)3. Barrier Deflection Characteristics of 31-inch W-Beam Guardrail Systems with 8-inch Blockouts (603481)4. Guidance for Raising Beam Guardrail Composite Blockout for Rail Height Adjustment (605311)5. MASH Coordination Effort (607241)6. Testing Roadside Safety Systems to MASH (607751)

It is anticipated that pooled fund members will review additional topics of interest and develop a work plan for selecting additional projects for FY 2017 and possibly beyond. Therefore, it is anticipated that additional activities will occur in FY 2017. However, this is yet to be determined.



Reports published by the Texas A&M University Transportation Institute (TTI) as part of the Roadside Safety Pooled Fund will be reviewed by MDOT’s Barrier Advisory Committee (BAC). Reports will be reviewed individually by BAC, prioritized based on relevance of topics contained in each report based on MDOT’s roadside safety needs.

BAC will then propose recommendations, as deemed appropriate, concerning the results and recommendations from these reports. BAC recommendations involving the development of new MDOT guidelines, standards, etc. or modifications to existing MDOT guidelines, standards, etc. may need to be submitted to others within MDOT (e.g., MDOT’s Engineering Operations Committee (EOC)) for further consideration and approval before implementation. These decisions will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

109

https://www.roadsidepooledfund.org/2014/10/27/placement-of-guardrail-on-slopes-phase-iii-603221-2/

https://www.roadsidepooledfund.org/2014/11/07/barrier-deflection-characteristics-of-31-inch-w-beam-guardrail-systems-with-8-inch-blockouts-603481/

https://www.roadsidepooledfund.org/2015/06/23/guidance-for-raising-beam-guardrail-composite-blockout-for-rail-height-adjustment-605311/

https://www.roadsidepooledfund.org/2016/10/11/mash-coordination-effort-607241/

https://www.roadsidepooledfund.org/2016/10/11/testing-roadside-safety-systems-to-mash-607751/


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: Regional Roadside Turf grass Performance Testing Program (Solicitation 1412)




TECHNICAL CONTACT Debra Flick LEAD AGENCY Minnesota DOT PROJECT MANAGER Lynn Lynwood CONTRACTOR




Minnesota DOT; Michigan DOT; Nebraska, New Jersey DOT, Wisconsin DOT PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This multi-state research project aims to provide participating departments of transportation with unbiased, up-to-date information about the performance of turf grass cultivars when used on roadsides in the northern United States. This project has four objectives:

1. Institute a multi-state roadside turf grass testing program.2. Develop a data collection and reporting system that provides the most recent research results to state DOTs in a timely manner.3. Increase collaboration between University research programs that work on roadside turf.4. Demonstrate the usefulness of regional roadside turf grass research in order to increase collaboration between Departments of

Transportation in future years.FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

1. 2016 was the first year of participation for MDOT. Project work plan and university research team was established; MichiganState University will be MDOT’s co-investigator. Performance testing parameters and Michigan roadside locations wereselected to conduct two roadside trials of individual cultivars submitted by public and private breeders.

2. Increased collaboration between University research programs that work on roadside turf.Investigate and share current data on turf grass seed species and varieties best suited to survive in the roadside environment ofnorthern states.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES 1. Report on installation and establishment of research plots.2. Website will be created to communicate data to participating states.



1. 2016 is the first year of this research project. Principal research team will create a website to communicate data to participatingstates.

2. If successful, this multi-state testing model could be repeated on a regular basis in future years so that state departments oftransportation would always be provided with recent, unbiased data upon which to make recommendations. Future trials couldlook at mixtures based on results from the proposed trial, optimal time of seeding or sodding, or examine other importantmanagement practices that are important for survival of turf in these harsh roadside environments.

110


5307 (2011)



STUDY TITLE: Development of Maintenance Decision Support System



COMPLETION DATE (Revised) 09/30/2018 TECHNICAL CONTACT David Huft, 605-773-3358 LEAD AGENCY South Dakota Department of Transportation PROJECT MANAGER Steve Cook, 517-636-4094 CONTRACTOR Meridian Environmental Technology, Inc.


FY FUNDS (Original) $25,000.00 TOTAL COST (Original)** $210,000.00 (Revised)* $33,952.37 (Revised)* $218,952.00

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $33,952.37 Total Committed Funds Available* $49,999.63 PARTICIPATING STATES


CA, CO, IA, ID, IN, KS, KY, MD, MI, MN, ND, NE, NH, NY, PA, SD, VA, WI, and WY PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Develop a Maintenance Decision Support System (MDSS) winter maintenance operations forecasting tool (computer web-based) that helps reduce winter maintenance costs, increases level of service based on recommendations, and helps provide a reduction in damage to infrastructure and the environment. Pilot the MDSS winter maintenance forecasting tool in the Southwest Region during the 2012 & 2013 winter seasons. Implement the forecasting tool statewide during the 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 winter seasons.


Meridian provided training in-person, via email, and over teleconference. The MDSS Graphical User Interface (GUI) manual was updated to reflect the new features that had been developed before the 2012 winter season. The development of a reference guide was also developed and distributed.

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Benefits to MDOT) 1. The following products or services were delivered from study activities performed in 2013:

• Refinement of GUI for quality forecasts• Refined interface/screen displays• Continued support for training in MDOT maintenance garages• MDSS smart phone application (app) for Android platform. (Currently working on an iPhone app.)

2. Deliverables that will benefit MDOT if implemented include:• Refined forecast and treatment recommendation• Better system functionality of the GUI• More efficient use of the MDSS program by staff as a result of training• Forecast and treatment recommendations providing anticipated savings on materials used• Collaboration with other states on better use of the program and changes needed


• Continued refinement of GUI• Development of MDSS website• Refined interface/screen displays• Continued support for training in MDOT maintenance garages• Developed MDSS app for IOS• Refined forecast and treatment recommendations• Created dashboards• More efficient use of MDSS program by staff as a result of training• Forecast and treatment recommendations providing anticipated savings on materials used• Collaboration with other states on better use of program and changes needed

111


Iteris provided MDSS training to MDOT users across the state. They continued to refine the MDSS website by adding features and functions from the GUI that are useful to maintenance crews. Iteris continues to work on MDSS training videos and have completed 21 short videos for users. The intent is to provide short videos explaining a specific topic so users have access to training information whenever they need it. Iteris also developed ‘dashboards’ to allow users to very quickly see current and forecasted weather data for user defined locations.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Iteris has developed a new MDSS website (WebMDSS) that includes functionality similar to the MDSS GUI. The vendor and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) identified and prioritized the most valuable functions from the GUI to be incorporated into the web-based application. The vendor has included all tier one prioritized items into the WebMDSS site and will continue to add functionality throughout 2017. The vendor has also successfully added weather, road, and maintenance reporting to the MDSS mobile application. This addition enables users to conveniently input data that can improve accuracy and recommendations.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Iteris will work with MDOT to increase the number of MDSS routes throughout the state. To increase use and benefits of the system we will explore adding routes in local agency contract areas. This year, Iteris will provide webinar MDSS training, enabling us to reach a broad audience of users. Iteris will continue to improve digital/wireless communication, applications, treatment recommendations and fine tune the interaction between the user (truck driver) and system. In addition to supporting winter maintenance, Iteris will enable weather monitoring in herbicide vehicles equipped with AVL/MDC during the summer months to support efficient operations. Iteris will continue to modify the WebMDSS website for functionality and will be adding additional management tool reporting capabilities. These management tools will enable us to visualize data collected (maps) such as material usage, snow fall amounts and other winter maintenance data.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) *The lead agency requested MDOT to transfer an additional amount of $8,952 to cover MDOT's actual expenditures in excess of the original FY 2015 budget estimates. Thus, a total of $33,952 was transferred in FY 2016. MDOT’s FY 2017 and 2018 funding contribution is posted to the new TPF-5(347) study.

** MDOT’s original total funding commitment [$210,000.00] is allocated over FY’s 2012; 2013; 2015-2017. The lead agency requested all partner states to transfer future funds to the new TPF-(347) which is a continuation of the existing TPF-5(054) study. As such, MDOT has increased its funding commitment through FY 2018 on the TPF website. During this extended period, the TAC has determined there are several areas where the MDSS can be upgraded to provide additional value to transportation agencies. Tasks for the next three years include:

• Developing and refining the performance of the MDSS website (WebMDSS)• Performing basic field research to improve MDSS forecasting accuracy• Developing a module to include real-time traffic data into MDSS• Improving the MDSS smart phone applications• Designing and developing a dashboard like interface within the MDSS GUI• Advanced Management Reporting Tools

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION 1. Due to the success of the implementation in the Southwest Region, the department has expanded its use of MDSS to include all

garages statewide. MDOT has recently selected a vendor to provide AVL/GPS as well as a fully functional MDSS for all maintenance garages. The MDSS will include snow route specific treatment recommendations as well as a detailed garage specific weather forecast. As of October 1, 2015, we have started implementing MDSS into our contract agency operations and will continue to roll-out MDSS to contract agencies through Fiscal Year (FY) 2018. All contract counties will have access to the MDSS website and will receive training from MDOT staff.

2. Completion of this project is anticipated in FY 2018.

112


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: Self De-Icing Led Signals




TECHNICAL CONTACT Susan Baker LEAD AGENCY Kansas DOT PROJECT MANAGER Paula Corlett CONTRACTOR





CA, KS, WI, MI, PA, NJ PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This proposed research project will develop and test different types of prototype self- deicing LED signals over a project period of three years. Project objectives are to develop multiple prototypes of a new type of self-deicing LED signals for highway signalized intersections and railroad signaling applications and validate them using field tests.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Benefits to MDOT) The TAC members approved the project scope. Devices were constructed for use during the 2016/2017 winter. Deliverables that might benefit MDOT if implemented include LED lens devices that will de-ice automatically when necessary and improve safety.


Field testing and deployment of de-icing devices around the state. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))

Solicitation 1403 was assigned federal project number TPF-5(351). SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION


113


5307



STUDY TITLE: National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) for FY 2015


TPF NO. TPF-5(416) MDOT START DATE 10/01/2015 PROJECT NO. Not applicable MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 09/30/2016

OR NO. COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT

LEAD AGENCY Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) PROJECT MANAGER Andre’ Clover, 517-636-6053 CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $1,100,000.00 BUDGETED AMT. (Original) $1,100,000.00 (Revised)* $1,333,900.00 ACTUAL COST (Revised)* $1,333,900.00

TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $1,333,900.00 Total Committed Funds Available $0.00 PARTICIPATING STATES


Not Applicable. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Every federal fiscal year, State Departments of Transportation are solicited to contribute 5.5 percent of their State Planning and Research (SP&R) Program federal funds to the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) to ensure its continued successful operation. The NCHRP is a federal program in place to develop and fund national transportation research in acute problem areas that affect highway planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance nationwide. The NCHRP disseminates information throughout the transportation community and conducts independent research that benefits various transportation agencies throughout the country.

FISCAL YEAR 2013 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Lawrence Technological University was awarded NCHRP Project 12-97: Design Guidelines for Field Deployment of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Prestressed Means in Bridge Construction with a $500,000 allocation. The purpose of this project is to investigate a full-depth CFRP deck panel system that greatly simplifies the construction process. The developed design system will need to be fully investigated before being implemented on a bridge project.

A successful implementation for CFRP reinforcement in the bridge industry calls for the development of standards that address all design and construction aspects, such as flexural strength, shear strength, bond strength, development length, creep, shrinkage, durability, handling, and erection. With such standards in hand, it is expected that the construction of CFRP/prestressed concrete bridges will grow to be a general practice rather than a demonstration practice.


• Thirty-two (32) new NCHRP Research Project Reports (January - October 2014) were published.• Fourteen (14) new NCHRP Synthesis Reports (March - July 2014) were published.• Four (4) new NCHRP Research Results Digests (January – July 2014) were published.• NCHRP announced its FY 2015 projects. Requests for Proposals (RFPs) were released in the fall.• NCHRP's 2013 Summary of Progress was published, highlighting the more than 161 projects completed in 2013. It includes a listing

of the more than 2,800 other projects undertaken by the program since 1962. Information on all projects initiated under the NCHRP from its inception in 1962 through 1988 is included in NCHRP Web Document 7: Special Edition of Summary of Progress through 1988.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The MDOT fund contribution in Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 provided support to NCHRP cost of operations. Deliverables included, but were not limited to the publications of NCHRP Research Reports, Synthesis Reports, Research Results Digests, National RFPs, and the production of the NCHRP 2015 Summary of Progress report.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The MDOT fund contribution in Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 provided support to NCHRP cost of operations. Deliverables included, but were not limited to the publications of NCHRP Research Reports, Synthesis Reports, Research Results Digests, National RFPs, and the production of the NCHRP 2016 Summary of Progress report. * The final contribution payment of $183,610.00 for previous TPF NCHRP (415) was billed/paid in FY 2016. The NCHRP (416) contribution payment of $1,150,290.00 was also billed/paid in FY 2016. Both payments were made as approved by the Michigan Department of Transportation Director, Kirk Steudle.

114

http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/NCHRP_Announcement2015.pdf

http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrpannual2013.pdf

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=6344&page=R1

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES MDOT plans to continue its annual funding support to NCHRP operations in FY 2017.



Research findings are published in the NCHRP Reports series and the NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practices series. MDOT technical experts have access to all NCHRP productions and continually review and share/incorporate NCHRP research findings and recommendations into its business operations as appropriate.

115


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: Evaluation of 0.7 inch Diameter Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Pretensioning Strands in Prestressed Beams


TPF NO. TPF-5(TBD) / OR15-541 MDOT START DATE 10/1/2016 SOLICITATION NO. 1433 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 12/31/2019 PROJECT NO. Not Applicable COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT TBD LEAD AGENCY TBD PROJECT MANAGER Matt Filcek CONTRACTOR


FY FUNDS (Original) $0.00 TOTAL BUDGET (Original) $90,000.00 (Revised) $0.00 (Revised)


Michigan DOT and Ohio DOT. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

Recent research developments on demonstration projects have shown that 0.6 inch diameter CFRP strands have smaller nominal area and lower allowable capacity than steel 0.6 inch diameter steel strands; thus requiring more strands for a given design. This makes it difficult for bridge designers to find projects where we can fit enough CFRP strands in a beam to meet load carrying requirements. The proposed research is necessary in order to evaluate the safe use of 0.7 inch diameter CFRP strands in a beam to meet load carrying requirements.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Benefits to MDOT) Following is a list of project development steps taken during fiscal year 2016:

• Solicitation posted on June 27, 2016• FHWA approved 100% state match waiver• As of September 30, 2016, approximately 45.4% of the target budget commitment [$330,000.00] is pledged.• Commitment Start: Fiscal Year 2017. FHWA program administrative procedures allow active solicitation durations of up to 12

months; after which an extension must be requested or solicitation ends.• The proposed project duration is 36 months.


Continue solicitation until target budget is reached. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))

Not applicable. SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION

Expected project completion in FY 2020.

116


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: AASHTOWare Project 3.01 Cooperative Software Development Project


TPF NO. TBD / OR15-517 MDOT START DATE 10/1/2015 PROJECT NO. Not Applicable MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2017


TECHNICAL CONTACT TBD LEAD AGENCY AASHTO PROJECT MANAGER Kevin Fox CONTRACTOR



TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $256,500.00 TOTAL COMMITTED FUNDS AVAILABLE* $234,500.00 PARTICIPATING STATES

Ten Participating State Dots: FL, GA, KY, MI, MN, OH, SC, TX, WV, WI NOTE: This AASHTO pooled fund project has a Total Project Budget of $5,000,000.00 with a 10% contribution percentage for each state.

PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This project included the analysis, design and engineering required to develop AASHTOWare Project release 3.01. The project included development of major functional enhancements to all the web-based modules including Preconstruction and Construction/Materials. The effort will keep the AASHTOWare Project software current with evolving technology and help ensure that MDOT business requirements are met in both the short and long term.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The following products or services were delivered this fiscal year:

1. Design deliverables2. BETA testing results3. AASHTOWare Project (AP) 3.01 delivered, 9.6.2016

Expected benefits include:

1. GLOBAL IMPROVEMENTS1.1. The additional functionality in the AASHTOWare Project 3.01 software will continue to build on the Unified database and architecture, providing a strong foundation for agency reporting and analysis as well as future AASHTO development efforts for decision support.1.2. The agency views (formerly known as “Templates”) functionality will be improved by providing a grid interface, conditional formatting support, improved field validation logic, and additional sample IronPython code.1.3. There will be improvements in support for agency reporting by offering easier access to the data models from ActiveReports.1.4. There are a number of usability features to make the system easier to use with more intuitive navigation, better messaging, and more flexibility when searching and filtering data. It will be easier to administer the system with documentation on the metadata structure used to configure both the user interface and the business layer. A list of changed entities and components for this and future web-based AASHTOWare Project releases will be included with the summary of changes which will help agencies determine theimpact that these changes could have on agency customized entities and components.

2. PRECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS2.1. Enhancements to AASHTOWare Project Preconstruction include an improved user experience when entering items for addenda and a tighter integration between proposals and the bid letting to which they are associated. Letting staff will be able to execute a variety of proposal reports from the bid letting summary, eliminating navigational overhead in the post-bid letting processing.2.2. Additional enhancements to project funding are included to increase efficiency, automating assignment of fund packages to new items and enforcing assignment levels by implementation of an agency option.

3. CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS3.1. The inclusion of force account functionality in AASHTOWare Project 3.01 extends the capability of tracking construction work being performed on site. This payment method will leverage the already included Change Order and Pay Estimate functionality to make a powerful, efficient tool to accurately track force account work.

117

3.2. The addition of the Storm Water Environmental Compliance Inspection Report (SECIR) in AASHTOWare Project 3.01 will allow an agency to record and track information for the U.S. federally mandated Clean Water Act. This is specifically related to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program that controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into waters of the United States. The SECIR report will leverage already existing daily work report weather information and system notification functionally to make response time to significant weather events more efficient with the goal of eliminating/reducing penalties associated with non-compliance. 3.3. AASHTOWare Project 3.01 will include the ability to create and maintain meeting records. Having meeting records in the system will provide agencies with an efficient and organized view of communications pertinent to contracts and projects for construction, materials, and civil rights and labor.

4. MATERIALS IMPROVEMENTS4.1. AASHTOWare Project 3.01 will include much anticipated enhanced materials functionality, including grid capability in the sample management views, review and approval of split samples, an approved products list, and source/facility mix design management. The sample management views (receiving samples, maintaining tests, entering test results, reviewing samples and tests) will be updated to include grid-style features: Up to 40 columns of data, suppression of like rows, user customization of column order, etc.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITIES 1. User Acceptance Testing2. AP-3.01 Implementation

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) MDOT’s original fund commitment of $500,000.00 was budgeted for $250,000.00 each in FY’s 2016 and 2017. Due to a late arriving invoice, no SPR-II funds were expended in FY 2016. MDOT plans to pay its full fund commitment in FY 2017.

SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION Submitted AP Construction/Materials Implementation (AP-CMI) to MDOT’s annual call for projects; it was prioritized and MDOT is moving forward.

The next steps include the AP-CMI project, which started 10.3.2016, in which AP-CM 3.01 will be implemented in production.

Our recommendation to other states which are implementing AP-CM is to begin with materials, especially materials acceptance.

118


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: MDOT SPR- Part 2 Program Peer Exchange


TPF NO. OR15-525 MDOT START DATE 7/1/2016 PROJECT NO. Not Applicable MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 12/31/2016


TECHNICAL CONTACT Andre Clover LEAD AGENCY MDOT PROJECT MANAGER Andre Clover CONTRACTOR





Not Applicable. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

In accordance with 23 CFR PART 420.209, a condition for approval of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) planning and research funds for Research Development & Test (RD&T) activities, a state Department of Transportation (DOT) must develop, establish, and implement a management process. This management process includes (amongst other things) that State DOTs participate in peer exchanges of its RD&T management process and of other state DOTs programs on a periodic basis.


During FY 2016, the Engineer of Research decided to postpone the planned research peer exchange until FY 2017 or 2018. No funds were expended in FY 2016.


Not Applicable. JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s))

Not Applicable SUMMARY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION

Project expected completion in FY 2017 or 2018.

119


5307 (9/13)



STUDY TITLE: AASHTOWare Development Project – Project Bids Software (AASHTO PBS)


TPF NO. Not Applicable MDOT START DATE 10/1/2014 PROJECT NO. 126199 MDOT COMPLETION DATE (Original) 9/30/2016 OR NO. OR15-101 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

TECHNICAL CONTACT

LEAD AGENCY Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) / American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO)

PROJECT MANAGER Larry Strzalka, 517-335-2220 [email protected]

CONTRACTOR

BUDGET STATUS

FY 2016 MDOT Budget MDOT Total Budget


TOTAL FY 2016 EXPENDITURES $81,000.00 TOTAL COMMITTED FUNDS AVAILABLE $0.00 PARTICIPATING STATES


MI, FL, GA, MN, MT, OH, CO, MS, VA, KY, WV, NE, LA, AZ, MO PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The purpose of this project is to develop a newly enhanced AASHTOWare Project Bids Software application to replace AASHTOWare Project Expedite, including a functional redesign of the software to better accommodate bidding needs.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Benefits to MDOT)

MDOT was selected as a beta testing agency for Project Bids. FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS

• Re-writing MDOT’s bidding configuration files to XML format used by the AASHTOWare Project Bids software and other softwareleveraging the interface format standard.

• Beta testing performed in fiscal year 2016

Agency Enhancements Planned: • Enhance configurability• Improve security with the use of X.509 certificates• Increase flexibility in bidder responses in the miscellaneous folders based on agency requirements• Enhance printing functionality• Process decrypted bid files to make them readable, eliminating the need of maintaining legacy software• Increase stability and develop a more robust framework for future enhancements• Improve flexibility with the use of open standards, e.g.: XML (GEN, LOAD, CONFIG), X.509, and ZIP file format vs. EBLIB

Bidders Enhancements Planned: • Improve error visibility when completing bids• Create one bidding application for all agencies that auto-updates• Improve attachments functionality that uploads files at the time they are attached to the bid file rather than ‘with’ the bid upload,

resulting in faster bid submission• Improve logging of bidder activity throughout the bidding process• Improve security with the use of X.509 certificates


• Implementation of new software expected in first quarter of FY 2017 [November of 2016]• Implementation of AASHTOWare Project Bids software with the November 4, 2016, bid letting.

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) None.

120



Implementation of AASHTOWare Project Bids software was completed November 4, 2016, Bid Letting.

121


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: University Transportation Center – Center for Highway Pavement Preservation


PROJECT MANAGER: Erin Chelotti CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0066 Z3 PROJECT START DATE 11/1/2014 PROJECT NO. 126401 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 1/31/2017 OR NO. OR15-508 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Michigan State University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Emin Kutay, Ph.D., P.E.

PROJECT BUDGET STATUS MDOT FY 2016 Budget Total Project Budget



MDOT and MSU Funding MDOT Funding $120,001.00 University Match $50,000.00

Total Budget $170,001.00

PURPOSE AND SCOPE One of the most important parameters of a chip seal design is the binder aggregate embedment depth. Transportation agencies typically specify an embedment depth on a percentage basis. Specifications require the embedment depth to be assessed after both construction completion and initial curing of the chip seal emulsion. Cold weather states generally require a 60-70 percent chip embedment depth while warm weather states require a 50-60 percent embedment depth at the time of initial acceptance. While the original chip seal design is based on a given percent embedment, an objective method to quantify and confirm percent embedment after placement does not exist. An objective field test is needed to support a more uniform method of acceptance for a chip seal treatment.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Task 1: The research team finished a detailed literature review. One goal of the literature review was to understand the significance of embedment depth on chip seal performance. It was found that a finite element analysis based chip seal performance study could be a possible candidate method to compare embedment depth and performance of chip seal.

Task 2: The research team developed two algorithms for chip seal project acceptance tests. The initial algorithm was developed for calculating aggregate embedment depth and was based on the following assumptions: (1) surface of the existing pavement is assumed to be perfectly straight, and (2) no binder absorbs into the existing pavement. The team has made significant improvements to the initial algorithm. The new algorithm is capable of finding existing pavement surface (i.e., the surface of the substrate) and determining aggregate embedment into the substrate. Additional core samples from the field were collected (with the help from MDOT regional offices) in order to further improve the robustness of the Algorithm. Also, the research team has designed and manufactured a lab sample fabrication setup for the laboratory samples.

Task 3: Sand patch tests were performed on all field samples. In addition, the Ames laser texture scanner at the MDOT regional office was used for all core samples in order to measure texture content as mean profile depth, texture profile index, and estimated texture depth. With the help of using actual aggregate shape properties being taken from images and estimated texture depth, the actual embedment depth for all samples was calculated. 40 laboratory chip seal samples have been fabricated in order to investigate usage of embedment depth and the image-based coverage area method, and to measure the performance of chip seal samples under the laboratory sweep test setup. First, eight chip seal samples (containing 2 replicates) were prepared using the lowest and highest binder and aggregate application rates specified in the MDOT standard specifications. For the first 8 samples, the research team observed that the binder application rate has a greater influence on percent embedment and binder coverage than the aggregate application rate. Therefore, in order to determine the effect of binder application rate, 32 more chip seal samples (with 2 replicates) were fabricated with an emulsion application range between 0.39 gal./yd2 and 0.46 gal./yd2 (MDOT specification) with an increment of 0.01 gal./yd2 and a constant aggregate application rate of 20 lb./yd2. 16 of the samples were analyzed through image processing techniques just after the sample fabrication. The remaining 16 samples were analyzed in terms of embedment depth and coverage area method after conducting sweep test in the laboratory.

122

Delays: A time delay of approximately 6 weeks occurred in waiting for the sweep test apparatus. This was due to a delay in manufacturing of the device from the supplier. It has since been received and abrasion testing is underway. Repair and maintenance of an environmental chamber used to condition lab samples also caused a slight time delay of approximately one week. The environmental chamber is now functional.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS The research team has continued to fabricate laboratory samples, and have also acquired, through MDOT, additional field samples. They have used these samples to develop a chip seal analysis software (CIPS) that utilizes 3 methods to determine embedment depth of the chip seal aggregate. Binder and aggregate application rates can be calculated with this program, which can be used for QC/QA procedures. Data from this analysis software can be exported to excel and then used to determine to percent within limits.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES The research team will be completing working to complete the final draft of the report and also refining the CIPS software based on comments received from the RAP. This final software will be included as a deliverable with the final report.




123


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: University Transportation Center – National University Rail Center, Tier I


PROJECT MANAGER: Nikkie Johnson CONTRACT/AUTHORIZATION NO. 2013-0067 Z11 PROJECT START DATE 1/1/2015 PROJECT NO. 126721 COMPLETION DATE (Original) 12/31/2016 OR NO. OR14-056 COMPLETION DATE (Revised)

RESEARCH AGENCY Michigan Technological University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Pasi Lautala, Research Assistant Professor




RITA, MTU and MDOT Funding MDOT Project Budget $99,997.35

University Match $24,999.00 University Non-SPRII $21,060.00

USDOT – RITA $18,167.65 Total Budget $164,224.00

PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this series of studies is to investigate capacity analysis methods and outcomes on shared use rail corridors, conduct life cycle analysis on modal decisions, recommend light density/rural rail line improvements, and conduct rail technology transfer sessions for MDOT’s Office of Rail and other stakeholders.

Michigan is looking to increase rail passenger traffic, both for commuter and intercity purposes. One of the main challenges is adequate capacity of rail corridors, some of which are owned by private freight railroads. It would be essential to operate these corridors with maximum efficiency so capital investments could be minimized. Looking at modal decisions and related investments from a broader perspective may ultimately influence those decisions and decisions related to supporting infrastructure investments. Insufficient use of light density/rural freight rail lines in the state may remove transportation economies from businesses depending on rail shipments, or at the minimum, transfer more freight to the already congested road network. MDOT is building the staff levels in the Office of Rail and staff expertise is not yet fully known. Additionally, experienced staff can benefit from technology transfer sessions on emerging topics.

FISCAL YEAR 2015 ACCOMPLISHMENTS LCA/LCCA Analysis: Continued data collection from literature, Highland Copper, and other associates. The first round of LCA analysis was performed in SimaPro, and the initial LCCA was performed through Excel. A Transportation Research Board (TRB) paper was submitted and accepted for presentation. Undergraduate Student Project: Created a list of potential projects initiated by Michigan Technological University and discussed alternative projects with MDOT, tentatively settling on the Lake State Railway project. The student project team was selected, they were briefed on the project, and taken on a student field trip to Saginaw for data collection. Michigan Rail Conference: Successfully conducted the rail conference with over 160 participants, and kept costs within budget. MDOT Coordination Meetings: Held the official kickoff web conference in April, and progress meeting/discussions were held periodically after the rail conference.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS LCA/LCCA Analysis: Finalized LCA/LCCA analysis, refined parameter values; completed the draft report and submitted for review. Undergraduate Student Project: Completed the site survey for drainage and structural work, and design review with Lake State Railway, the final design report, and final briefing. Michigan Rail Conference: Planned for MIRC 2016 in Marquette, including holding the initial planning committee meeting, preparing the preliminary budget, conducting the event. This year’s theme was “Connecting the Dots: Business, Communities and Technology.”

124

MDOT Coordination Meetings: The next progress meeting is planned for April, 2016, but a web conference will be conducted in November to review LCA/LCCA study outcomes and provide update on the student project. Regular conference calls on the MI Rail Conference will begin again late in the year.

FISCAL YEAR 2017 PROPOSED ACTIVITES Projects conclude on 12/31/16. Revising of final reports and spotlight documents to be completed.



Project completion expected fiscal year 2017.

125


5312 (2014)



PROJECT TITLE: University Transportation Center – Developing Michigan Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Models


PROJECT MANAGER: Carissa McQuiston


RESEARCH AGENCY University of Michigan PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR Robert C. Hampshire




MDOT and UM Funding MDOT Funding $249,999.31 University Match $62,500.00

Total Budget $312,499.31 .

PURPOSE AND SCOPE Pedestrian and bicycle-involved crashes are an emphasis area of the traffic safety community. Given the emphasis of non-motorized transportation at local, state, and national levels, there has been additional interest in further understanding pedestrian and bicyclist safety issues. Despite existing research and improvements, pedestrian and bicycle-involved crashes, injuries, and fatalities have remained relatively stable in Michigan. Because of this, it is important to better identify those locations and attributes associated with locations that are most prone to such crashes.

1. Document and learn from existing research on modeling/mapping pedestrian and bicyclingsafety areas.

2. Gather new data on how to model/map pedestrian and bicycling crashes in Michigan.3. Analyze these data in order to produce a model/mapping tool that best determines locations in Michigan that could

benefit from pedestrian and bicycling crash countermeasure installations.4. The methodologies/tool(s) will be able:

a) Visualize both pedestrian and bicycle crashesb) Provide a risk score (based on mapping crashes and the risk characteristics mentioned

above) for a defined area or network (with crash summaries)c) Provide risk scores across the entire state (with crash summaries)d) Provide process that results in viable output formats (GIS oriented: .kml, .dbf, .csv) and the process toadd data and update regularly.

5. Report out methodology and results of this analysis.6. Produce a dataset for use in a GIS tool.

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Task 2 Data Collection) Data collection and inventory phase - MDOT road elements, National Household Travel Survey Data, U.S. Census data, manual observations from Ann Arbor, employment data from LEHD and reference USA, land-use zoning data (Task 4 Statistical Modeling) Developed and implemented an enhanced bike and ped exposure models which are a key ingredient into the risk score. The method is called the GIS accessibility model and is based on NCHRP report 770. This method utilizes the MI Counts state wide travel survey. (Task 4 Statistical Modeling) Risk Score: We have improved our earlier version of the risk score. We have implemented the preliminary risk score for Washtenaw and Kent county in GIS and a web browser based tool. We have attached a memo describing the risk score.

126

JUSTIFICATION(S) FOR REVISION(S) (List the approval date for the revision(s)) This project was originally included in the FY 2016 program as a typical 80 percent federally funded project using 20 percent State of Michigan funds as a match. During FY 2016, the project was started as a University Transportation Center using a 20 percent university match.


Project Expected Completion in fiscal year 2018.

127