research article characterization of expressed sequence...
TRANSCRIPT
Comparative and Functional GenomicsComp Funct Genom 2005; 6: 301–306.Published online 11 July 2005 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/cfg.484
Research Article
Characterization of expressed sequence tagsfrom a Gallus gallus pineal gland cDNA library
Stefanie Hartman1, Greg Touchton1, Jessica Wynn1, Tuoyu Geng1, Nelson W. Chong2 and Ed Smith1*1Comparative Genomics Lab, Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA2Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
*Correspondence to:Ed Smith, 2250 Litton ReavesHall, Blacksburg, VA24061, USA.E-mail: [email protected]
Received: 12 January 2005Revised: 22 May 2005Accepted: 1 June 2005
AbstractThe pineal gland is the circadian oscillator in the chicken, regulating diversefunctions ranging from egg laying to feeding. Here, we describe the isolation andcharacterization of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) isolated from a chicken pinealgland cDNA library. A total of 192 unique sequences were analysed and submittedto GenBank; 6% of the ESTs matched neither GenBank cDNA sequences nor thenewly assembled chicken genomic DNA sequence, three ESTs aligned with sequencesdesignated to be on the Z random, while one matched a W chromosome sequence andcould be useful in cataloguing functionally important genes on this sex chromosome.Additionally, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified and validatedin 10 ESTs that showed 98% or higher sequence similarity to known chicken genes.Here, we have described resources that may be useful in comparative and functionalgenomic analysis of genes expressed in an important organ, the pineal gland, in amodel and agriculturally important organism. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons,Ltd.
Keywords: Gallus gallus; pineal gland ESTs, SNPs
Introduction
Circadian rhythm is a general characteristic of liv-ing organisms. Both physiological and genetic fac-tors involved in this process continue to be verywidely investigated in different organisms. In mam-malian and avian systems, it is a general consensusthat the physiological and genetic processes of bio-logical rhythms occur in a loop. The molecularmechanisms that control the loop appear to be con-served among diverse species. The avian circadianrhythm is unique as it involves multiple organswhose inputs and interactions influence the oscilla-tory patterns of rhythmic behaviour (Ebihara et al.,1987). Some of the positive and negative regulatorgenes involved in the autoregulatory feedback loopmechanism for the circadian oscillator in the pinealgland have been described in diverse birds, includ-ing the quail (Yoshimura et al., 2000) and chicken(Okano et al., 2001).
The chicken pineal gland is an important modelfor vertebrate circadian clock systems becauseof its ability to retain circadian rhythm in cul-ture. Several important genes have been iden-tified in the pineal gland. One important com-ponent of the autoregulatory feedback loop ofthe circadian oscillator is the negative regula-tor gene, cPer2 ; the gene products of cBmal1,cBmal2 and cClock form heterodimers that bindto a promoter sequence of cPer2 and activatetranscription (Okano et al., 2001). The photore-ceptor pinopsin has been shown to be present,although its expression responds exclusively tolight and not circadian patterns. The arylalkylamineN -acetyltransferase (AA-NAT) gene product, how-ever, has been directly linked to melatonin produc-tion in a circadian rhythm (Takanaka et al., 1988).In addition, GCAP1, GCAP2 and GC, genes thatare important in resetting rods and cones after lightexposure, have been identified in the pineal gland(Semple-Rowland, 1999).
Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
302 S. Hartman et al.
Since the chicken is considered an excellentmodel for further understanding the genetic andmolecular basis of rhythmic behaviour, here weinvestigated the characteristics of expressed se-quence tags (ESTs) isolated from the chicken pinealgland. While previous work by Hubbard et al.(2005) has yielded a number of ESTs in suchimportant functional tissues as the liver, pancreas,heart, cerebellum, kidney and ovary, none hasbeen described to date from the pineal gland.Bailey et al. (2003) used microarray technologyto evaluate pineal genes expressed in periodsof light and darkness with a focus on functionrather than sequence comparisons. The primarygoal of our study was to identify novel genes thatcould be useful in comparative genome analysis ofthe molecular mechanisms that underlie rhythmicbehaviour. Additionally, we evaluated the level ofvariation in selected ESTs that matched knownchicken genes using in silico analysis followed byPCR-based resequencing for validation.
Materials and methods
Sequence analysis
The ESTs were obtained from a previously descri-bed chicken pineal gland-cDNA library (Chonget al., 2000). Briefly, the library was establishedfrom 10–11 day-old White Leghorn birds under12 h light. The ESTs were produced from single-pass sequencing of randomly selected clones, pro-cessed by a modification of the toothpick PCRdescribed by Smith et al. (2001). The modificationinvolved first converting the original library fromHybriZAP2.1 into phagemid, using the manufac-turer’s (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA92037) recommen-dation. The ESTs were characterized using BLAT(http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgBlat?com-mand=start&org=Chicken&db=galGal2&hgsid=30295 885) and BLAST to identify data-base matches corresponding to the recently releasedchicken genomic DNA sequence and known genesin GenBank, respectively.
The chicken radiation hybrid panel (Morissonet al., 2002) was used to map VTEST71 in order tovalidate the in silico chromosomal location of theEST. Forward and reverse primers specific for theEST, designed using Primer 3 (Rozen and Skalet-sky, 1997), were used for the genotyping. The
forward and reverse primers were 5′-GAT TTCAAA ACG GAC TTG AG-3′ and 5′-TGA GCAGTC ACT TTT AGC ATT-3′, respectively. ThePCR was carried out in a final volume of 10 µlcontaining 1.5 mM Mg2+ Buffer (Eppendorf, West-bury, NY), 200 µM dNTPs, 70 µg primer (MWGBiotech), 1 U Taq (Eppendorf), and 5 ng template.The cycling was performed using a Mastercycler(Brinkmann, Westbury, NY) with the followingprogram: initial denaturation at 95 ◦C for 5 min fol-lowed by 95 ◦C for 45 s, 55 ◦C for 45 s, 72 ◦C for45 s for a total of 38 cycles of denaturation, anneal-ing and extension, respectively. A final extension at72 ◦C was carried out for 7 min. The PCR productwas run on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidiumbromide, and scored as 0, 1 or 2 for absent, present,or ambiguous, respectively. Mapping results weredetermined by the Morisson lab from these data.
SNP analysis
An in silico analysis of 10 ESTs that closelymatched chicken genes was used to identify can-didate SNPs in the ESTs according to the pipelineprotocol of Buetow et al. (1999). Validation of thecandidate SNPs for three of the ESTs was carriedout by PCR-based resequencing of amplicons from10 unrelated commercial birds, using previouslydescribed protocols (Smith et al., 2001).
Results and discussion
Of the 200 clones sequenced, a total of 192sequences exceeded a Phred quality score of 30(Ewing et al., 1998). These 192 sequences weresubmitted to GenBank and have been assignedaccession numbers (Table 1; and at http://filebox.vt.edu/users/esmith/Hartman Va Tech CFGsupplement/Hartman Va Tech Table 1.doc). Atotal of 17 ESTs (9%) matched neither GenBankcDNA sequences nor the newly assembled chickengenomic DNA sequence. Additionally, only 80ESTs matched known chicken gene or cDNAsequences. All but 28 ESTs aligned with genomicDNA sequences assigned to chicken chromo-somes. Ninety-one (about 47%) ESTs aligned withsequences assigned to macrochromosomes (GGA)1–6, and four sequences aligned to genomic DNAsequences assigned to the Z chromosome. An addi-tional three ESTs aligned with sequences desig-nated to be on the Z random, while one matched
Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Comp Funct Genom 2005; 6: 301–306.
Comparative analysis of chicken ESTs 303
Tab
le1.
Cha
ract
eris
tics
ofth
eD
NA
sequ
ence
sof
cDN
Acl
ones
rand
omly
sele
cted
from
ach
icke
npi
neal
glan
dcD
NA
libra
ry∗†
ES
T-I
DS
IZE
(bp)
dbE
ST
IdG
enB
ank
Acc
.No
.O
vlst
art
Ovl
end
Ho
mo
(%)
CH
RO
Seq
Sta
rtS
eqE
ndId
enti
ty
VTE
ST1
659
2199
861
2C
K983
005
1464
498
.20
Un
9708
143
097
082
805
Onc
horh
ynch
usm
ykiss
prot
easo
me
subu
nit/
AF3
6136
6/80
/311
/387
VTE
ST2
648
2200
095
4C
K985
347
564
898
.00
727
240
166
2724
080
3N
one
VTE
ST3
1152
2200
096
5C
K985
358
439
692
91.6
0U
n11
900
513
911
900
561
1N
one
VTE
ST4
658
2200
097
6C
K985
369
3265
899
.70
222
613
997
2261
462
3N
one
VTE
ST5
838
2200
098
7C
K985
380
163
583
93.0
01
9638
189
296
399
994
Gal
lus
gallu
sam
yloi
dpr
ecur
sor
prot
ein
mRN
A/A
F042
098.
1/95
/207
/217
VTE
ST6
579
2200
099
8C
K985
391
162
483
95.0
0U
n59
988
455
5998
884
5N
one
VTE
ST6
579
162
445
97.4
01
181
404
458
181
404
473
Non
eV
TEST
767
422
001
009
CK9
8540
218
674
97.8
01
116
212
103
116
216
443
Mus
mus
culu
str
affic
king
prot
ein
part
icle
com
plex
2/BC
0348
45.1
/84/
355/
422
VTE
ST8
892
2200
102
0C
K985
413
Gal
lus
gallu
sge
nefo
rBc
l-2pr
otei
n/D
1138
2.1/
84/2
19/2
59,G
allu
sdo
mes
ticus
mR
NA
for
PCKB
CL2
/Z11
961.
1/83
/216
/259
VTE
ST9
678
2200
103
1C
K985
424
663
299
.40
210
532
662
610
533
405
7G
allu
sdo
mes
ticus
mRN
Afo
rtr
anst
hyre
tin/X
6047
1.1/
99/6
22/6
26,
Gal
lus
gallu
sfin
ished
cDN
A/B
X93
518
1.1/
100/
279/
279
VTE
ST10
693
2199
861
3C
K983
006
5169
399
.70
M91
3197
73G
allu
sga
llus
mito
chon
dria
lDN
A/A
P003
318.
1/10
0/64
3/64
3V
TEST
1168
621
998
624
CK9
8301
732
593
96.5
0U
n59
912
274
6085
073
5N
one
VTE
ST12
685
2199
863
5C
K983
028
5468
497
.00
Un
6308
686
063
087
492
Gal
lus
gallu
sch
rom
osom
eU
NK
clon
eTA
M33
-40B
24/A
C14
0947
.1/9
0/48
1/53
3,V
TEST
1268
554
685
97.0
01
161
372
482
161
373
115
Gal
lus
gallu
scl
one
WA
G-7
1G10
/AC
0917
51.2
/85/
484/
566
VTE
ST13
679
2199
864
6C
K983
039
8767
489
.30
157
488
642
750
040
0D
anio
rerio
simila
rto
phos
phot
idyl
inos
itolt
rans
fer
prot
ein/
BC04
7829
.1/8
8/66
/75
VTE
ST14
640
2200
089
5C
K985
288
212
576
99.2
0U
n15
029
325
915
029
402
5G
allu
sga
llus
finish
edcD
NA
/BX
932
334.
1/99
/596
/600
VTE
ST15
675
2200
090
6C
K985
299
Gal
lus
gallu
sfin
ished
cDN
A/B
X93
538
7.1/
84/4
20/5
00,G
allu
sga
llus
mRN
Afo
rtr
ansr
atio
nally
cont
rolle
dtu
mou
rpr
otei
n/D
2631
2.1/
83/4
16/5
00V
TEST
1664
422
000
917
CK9
8531
015
644
99.7
01
4740
171
947
404
831
Bos
taur
usm
RNA
for
ribos
omal
prot
ein
L3/Z
2955
5.2/
84/5
22/6
20,
B.ta
urus
ribos
omal
prot
ein
L3(R
pl3)
/NM
174
715.
1/84
/522
/620
∗ Whe
reO
vlst
art
and
Ovl
end
are
the
star
tan
den
dpo
sitio
nsin
the
quer
yse
quen
ceth
atov
erla
psth
eas
sem
bled
chic
ken
geno
mic
DN
Ase
quen
ce;H
omo
(%),
the
perc
enta
gesim
ilarit
yof
the
quer
yse
quen
ceto
the
asse
mbl
edch
icke
nD
NA
sequ
ence
inth
em
atch
edre
gion
;CH
RO,t
hech
rom
osom
eto
whi
chth
em
atch
edse
quen
ceis
assig
ned
byBL
AT
whi
char
eas
defin
ed(6
);Se
qSta
rtan
dSe
qEnd
,the
posit
ions
ofth
eas
sem
bled
chic
ken
DN
Ase
quen
ceat
whi
chth
em
atch
edES
Tse
quen
ceor
the
quer
yst
arts
and
ends
,res
pect
ivel
y;G
enBa
nkm
atch
esof
the
resp
ectiv
eES
T:ea
chde
scrip
tion
ofth
eda
taba
sese
quen
ceis
follo
wed
byth
eA
cces
sion
No.
,the
%id
entit
yan
dth
eov
erla
p,sh
owin
gth
ele
ngth
sof
the
quer
yan
dda
taba
sese
quen
ces
inth
eov
erla
p.A
deta
iled
Tabl
e1
isav
aila
ble
atht
tp://
file
box.
vt.e
du/u
sers
/esm
ith/
Har
tman
Va
Tec
hC
FG
supp
lem
ent/
Har
tman
Va
Tec
hT
able
1.do
c
Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Comp Funct Genom 2005; 6: 301–306.
304 S. Hartman et al.
a W chromosome sequence. The highest numberof ESTs, 30, matched sequences from chromo-some 1, while none aligned with sequences frommicrochromosomes 16, 19, 21, 25 and 26. Nine-teen ESTs (11.7%) aligned with sequences desig-nated ‘unknown,’ which are reported by the Inter-national Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium(2004) to be about 12% of the chicken genome.Seven ESTs matched sequences assigned either tomore than one region of a chromosome or ondifferent chromosomes. A few ESTs aligned withsequences from Escherichia coli, which could bedue to bacterial contamination or simply to con-served sequences. The chromosomal assignmentsof some of the ESTs should be considered putative,as there are still many errors in the draft chickengenomic DNA sequence. The incompleteness of theGallus gallus DNA sequence may also account forthe relatively high percentage of ESTs that showedno significant sequence similarity to known chickensequences.
The chromosomal assignment of VTEST71 tochromosome 18, based on the sequence alignment
with the recently released genomic DNA, was con-firmed by radiation hybrid mapping. VTEST71 isdesignated as locus VTC08 on the chicken radi-ation hybrid map and is flanked by MCW0217and ADL0290, with LOD scores of 10.7 and 13.1,respectively. VTEST71 showed 99% sequence sim-ilarity to chicken histone protein H3 and 95% iden-tity with human Histone H3.3 (AK130772). Previ-ously, chicken H3 was also mapped to chromosome18 by RFLP, while the human H3 was linked tochromosome 17 (Levin et al., 1994).
A total of 22 SNPs were identified and vali-dated in the three ESTs scanned (data not pre-sented). Eight of the SNPs were non-synonymousand are described in Table 2. All the SNPs appearto be novel and have not been previously described(Smith et al., 2002; Wong et al., 2004). There-fore, these SNPs, although few, may be useful inefforts to assign phenotypes to genotypes and iden-tifying the effects of the three genes on differentchicken traits, e.g. knowledge of the function ofcofilin, an essential protein for depolymerization ofactin filaments, is still limited (Arber et al., 1998).
Table 2. Sequence contexts of SNPs validated by resequencing
ID of VTESTMatched gene/Accession No./%similarity/length of match (bp) EST-SNP sequence context/position∗
VTEST 85 Gallus gallus cofilin mRNA/M55659/98% ccatggct(tct, S → tgt, W)ggagtaacag/49†
648/661 tttaatgac(atg, M, → ttg, L)aaagtaa/93†
aagaaag(c/g)cgttctcttctgct/145gagacaaagga(a/g)tctaag(aag, K → agg, R)ga/320, 328†
aggtattaaacatga(g/a)tggcaagta/443cagacaagt(g/a)ccatctggatcta/557tggaatagt(a/g)ttagtctcccttt/610cctggtagtttta(t/c)gtaggatccaa/734ggtgggatgg(t/c)agactctatac/900gcacacaaca(c/t)tatgcatttaa/1018catatctta(t/c)aaatgaagtagct/1150aaacatcgg(t/c)catgatggca/1270
VTEST 56 Gallus gallus collapsin response mediatorprotein/U17 277/99%
gtgggaagatc(gtc, V → gcc, A)aatgacgac/375†
639/642 tgattac(tcc, S → tgc, C)ctgcacgtggac/708†
tggctttagc(ttg, L → atg, M)tctggcgcact/1922†
VTEST 137 Gallus gallus elongation factor 1α
mRNA/L00677/99% 643/649ctaaagacca(t/c)ccgaaatgggaa/55
aggaccatcg(a/g)gaagttcg/aagaa/179,187cttttgtgcca(a/g)tctctggttggaacgg/637caactgaca(a/g)acctctgcgtct/791gaaagatgtccgc(cgt,R → ggt,G)ggtaacgttg/1024†
∗ Each sequence context is followed by the position or locus of the SNP in the GenBank sequence of the matched Gallus gallusgene. Within each sequence context, the two alleles at the SNP locus are shown in parentheses. Each allele was observed in aminimum of two chromosomes or a frequency of 10% in a commercial population previously described (Smith et al., 2002)† Represents a non-synonymous change. The amino acid and codon changes are both indicated.
Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Comp Funct Genom 2005; 6: 301–306.
Comparative analysis of chicken ESTs 305
The three non-synonymous SNPs described may beuseful in further defining its role in skeletal func-tion and the dynamics of actin filaments. Similarly,the recently discovered collapsin response media-tor gene product is thought to have a role in theincidence and/or severity of Alzheimer’s disease(Yoshida et al., 1998). The SNPs described in thisgene in Gallus gallus may be useful in investigat-ing the role of this apparently important gene thatis also expressed in the chicken pineal gland.
It is not surprising that only 45% of the ESTsaligned to GGA1-6 DNA sequences, which com-prise approximately 65% of the chicken genome.In their analysis of the draft sequence, the Inter-national Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium(2004) reported that the density of CpG islandsshowed a strong negative correlation with chro-mosome length. This distribution supports ear-lier studies by McQueen et al. (1998) and Smithet al. (2000) of a higher density of genes onthe microchromosomes than on the macrochromo-somes. Several explanations are possible for the9% of ESTs that did not match known sequencesin GenBank, including novelty in vertebrates, tooshort to match known sequences, or contamination.In a recent comparative gene analysis between thechicken and human genomes, Castelo et al. (2005)predicted that the undiscovered genes in the humangene set may be very low, at a predicted lower limitof about 0.2%.
The number of ESTs and SNPs described in thepresent work are small relative to the total num-bers of both genomic reagents currently available inGenBank and other databases. That they are poten-tially useful, however, is evident by the novelty ofsome of the sequences. Since a significant fractionmatched mammalian genes and/or DNA sequences,they can be used as resources for comparativegenome analysis of genes expressed in the pinealgland. Such comparative analysis may be useful inassigning function to chicken sequences. A simi-lar impact on chicken biology is also likely withthe SNPs described. Finally, it is worthy of notethat one of the ESTs matched a W chromosome-assigned sequence. Currently, the number of genesassigned to this chromosome is limited. As effortssuch as ours, even though limited in scope, iden-tify additional ESTs, it will provide the genomicreagents essential to further increase our under-standing of a chromosome that continues to be littleunderstood.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Alain Vignal of the National Institute of Agri-cultural Research, France, for providing the RH panel, andKwaku Gyenai in the Comparative Genomics Laboratoryat VT for the EST homology data from BLAST analysis.We are also grateful to three anonymous reviewers whosecomments were used to make an extensive revision to theResults and Discussion.
References
Arber S, Barbayannis FA, Hanser H, et al. 1998. Regulation ofactin dynamics through phosphorylation of cofilin by LIM-kinase. Nature 393: 805–809.
Bailey MJ, Beremand PD, Hammer R, et al. 2003. Transcriptionalprofiling of the chick pineal gland, a photoreceptive circadianoscillator and pacemaker. Mol Endocrinol 17: 2084–2095.
Buetow KH, Edmonson MN, Cassidy AB. 1999. Reliable identi-fication of large numbers of candidate SNPs from public ESTdata. Nat Genet 21: 323–325.
Chong N, Bernard M, Klein DC. 2000. Characterization of thechicken serotonin N acetyltransferase gene. J Biol Chem 42:32 911–32 998.
Castelo R, Reymond A, Wyss C, et al. 2005. Comparative genefinding in chicken indicates that we are closing in on the set ofmulti-exonic widely expressed human genes. Nucleic Acids Res33: 1935–1939.
Ebihara S, Oshima I, Yamada H, Goto M, Sato K. 1987. Circadianorganization in the pigeon. In Comparative Aspects of CircadianClocks, Hiroshige T, Honma K (eds). Hokkaido UniversityPress: Sapporo, Japan.
Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. 1998. Base-calling ofautomated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment.Genome Res 8: 175–185.
Hubbard S, Grafhman DV, Beattie KJ, et al. 2005. Transcriptomeanalysis for the chicken based on 1626 finished cDNA sequencesand 485 337 expressed sequence tags. Genome Res 15: 174–183.
International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2004.Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genomeprovide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695–716.
International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium. 2004. Agenetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 432: 717–722.
Levin I, Santangelo L, Cheng H, Crittenden LB, Dodgson JB,1994. An autosomal genetic linkage map of the chicken. J Hered85: 79–85.
McQueen HA, Siriaco G, Bird AP, 1998. Chicken microchromo-somes are hyperacetylated, early replicating, and gene rich.Genome Res 8: 621–630.
Morisson M, Lemiere A, Bosc S, et al. 2002. ChickRH6: achicken whole-genome radiation hybrid panel. Genet Sel Evol34: 521–533.
Okano T, Fukada Y. 2001. Photoreception and circadian clocksystem of the chicken pineal gland. Microsc Res Tech 53: 72–80.
Okano T, Yamamoto K, Okano K, et al. 2001. Chicken pinealclock genes: implication of BMAL2 as a bidirectional regulatorin circadian clock oscillation. Genes Cells 6: 825–836.
Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Comp Funct Genom 2005; 6: 301–306.
306 S. Hartman et al.
Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ. 1997. Primer 3. Code available at;http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/genome software/other/primer3.html.
Semple-Rowland S, Larkin P, Bronson JD, et al. 1999. Character-ization of the chicken GCAP gene array in analyses of GCAP1,GCAP2, and GC1 gene expression in normal and rd chickenpineal. Mol Vision 5: 14.
Smith J, Bruley CK, Paton IR, et al. 2000. Differences in genedensity on chicken macrochromosomes and microchromosomes.Anim Genet 31: 96–103.
Smith EJ, Shi L, Drummond P, et al. 2001. Expressed sequencetags for the chicken genome from a normalized 10 day-oldWhite Leghorn whole embryo cDNA library: 1. DNA sequencecharacterization and linkage analysis. J Hered 92: 1–8.
Smith EJ, Shi L, Smith G. 2002. Expressed sequence tags for thechicken genome from a normalized 10-day-old white leghornwhole-embryo cDNA library. 3. DNA sequence analysis ofgenetic variation in commercial chicken populations. Genome45: 261–267.
Takanaka Y, Okano T, Iigo M, Fukada Y. 1988. Light-dependentexpression of pineal gene in chicken pineal gland. J Neurochem70: 908–913.
Yoshida H, Watanabe A, Ihara Y. 1998. Collapsin responsemediator protein-2 is associated with neurofibrillary tangles inAlzheimer’s disease. J Biol Chem 273: 9761–9768.
Yoshimura T, Suzuki Y, Makino E, et al. 2000. Molecularanalysis of avian circadian clock genes. Mol Brain Res 78:207–215.
Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Comp Funct Genom 2005; 6: 301–306.
Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology