research article effects of different enzymes and
TRANSCRIPT
Research ArticleEffects of Different Enzymes and Concentrations inthe Production of Clarified Lemon Juice
Filiz Uccedilan1 Asiye Akyildiz2 and Erdal ALccedilam2
1 Food Engineering Department Engineering Faculty Kilis 7 Aralık University 79000 Kilis Turkey2 Food Engineering Department Agricultural Faculty Cukurova University 01330 Adana Turkey
Correspondence should be addressed to Filiz Ucan ucanfilizgmailcom
Received 22 January 2014 Revised 13 April 2014 Accepted 28 April 2014 Published 1 June 2014
Academic Editor Dike O Ukuku
Copyright copy 2014 Filiz Ucan et al This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited
Lemon juice obtained from Interdonato variety was treated with different enzymes at specific concentrations as depectinizationprocesses to produce clear lemon juice and its concentrates In addition the best condition obtained from laboratory treatmentswas carried out in the local fruit juice plant Effects of the processing steps on some quality parameters were investigated during thelemon juice production and the obtained concentrates were stored at minus25∘C for 180 days The results showed that Novozym 33095had the best depectinization effectiveness Total pectin content of lemon juices decreased rapidly following the enzyme treatmentand could not be detected following the filtration Viscosity values decreased after pulp separation and the largest reduction wasobserved with the filtration At the end of filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of the three enzymes values of residualpectinmethylesterase (PME) activity were found to be in the lowest amounts
1 Introduction
Citrus is one of the most important fruit crop in the worldLemons ranked third among the citrus industry in the worldwith a total annual production of about 9 in the citrusproduction [1] Lemons are cultivated in many countries allover the world (13861411 ton) and Turkey ranked the sixth inthe production of lemon (790211 ton) in 2011 [2]
The lemon (Citrus limon (L) Burm f) has many import-ant natural chemical components including citric acid ascor-bic acid minerals and flavonoids Although their health-related properties have always been associatedwith their con-tent of vitamin C it has recently been shown that flavonoidsalso play a role in this respect Lemon fruits not only havetheir delicious flavors but also have their antioxidant capacitywith health benefits [3ndash6]
Lemons are usually earmarked for fresh consumption andfor the elaboration of juices additives and various other pro-cessed products New alternatives for beverages elaborationmay result in a promising use of surplus production [7]Lemon juice is widely used as an antioxidant natural substi-tute for the synthetic ascorbic or citric acids (E300 and E330resp) [8] Clarified lemon juice is a suitable acidifying agent
that can substitute citric acid and provide more ldquonaturalrdquoproducts that will fit the new market for ecological productsand new alternatives to the manufacturing of lemon [9]Clarified lemon juice can be consumed directly such as fruitjuice and also used for production of nectar jam marmaladeand sweet lemon sauce in ready to eat meal sector candyalcoholic beverages and acidity regulator in fruit juice andhas recently been used as fillings in canned fruits Saura et al[9ndash11] reported that use of lemon juice as a substitute for citricacid in canned fruit for example peach halves will yield aldquonaturalrdquo product for the new market of ecological products
The traditional method of clarification of juice whichcontains pectin involves a number of steps including cen-trifugation to remove suspended solid hydrolysis of pectinwith specific enzymes (depectinization) flocculation of tur-bidity with clarifying agents and finally filtration by thediatomaceous earth to remove the fining agents [12]
Fruit juices contain colloids that are mainly polysaccha-rides (pectin cellulose hemicellulose lignin and starch)protein tannin and metals The principal purpose of theclarification process employed in industrial juice processingis to eliminate constituents responsible for the turbidity andcloudiness in freshly produced juice The key of producing
Hindawi Publishing CorporationJournal of Food ProcessingVolume 2014 Article ID 215854 14 pageshttpdxdoiorg1011552014215854
2 Journal of Food Processing
clear and stable fruit juice is a complete enzymatic breakdownof pectin Pectins make the clarification process harderbecause of their fiber-like molecular structure Enzymes(particularly pectinases) can play a key role in improvingjuice clarity and stability as well as reducing the viscosityTheprocess of depectinization involves the use of commercialenzymes generally a blend of pectinases (eg pectinasepectinesterase polygalacturonase cellulase and pectin lyase)to degrade pectic substances These enzymes degrade pectininto smaller units Pectinase hydrolyzes pectin and causespectin-protein complexes to flocculate Polygalacturonasedepolymerises the polygalacturonic acid chain via breakingdown a-14 glycosidic bond while pectin lyase depolymerisesthe high esterified (approx 65 plusmn 98) pectin pectin esterasehydrolyses the methoxy group of the pectin chain Theresulting juice from this pectinase treatment will have amuchlower amount of pectin and lower viscosity which will beadvantageous in facilitating the subsequent filtration pro-cesses [13]
Clarification is an important processing step used by thelemon juice industry Clarification is necessary in order toobtain a bright clear product with low viscosity Clarificationof juice involves the use of bentonite gelatin and silica solas fining agents These three components bentonite gelatinand silica sol have successfully been applied for an efficientclarification
Viscosity is one of themost important physical propertiesof a fluid system [14] Viscosity cloud stability and other foodproperties are affected by the impact of pectic enzymes par-ticularly pectinmethylesterase (PME) a ubiquitous enzymein plants that deesterifies the methoxylated pectin in theplant cell wall PME is released into juice during extractionPME hydrolyses ester bonds of pectin in citrus juices result-ing in decreased cloud stability [15] Pectin is responsible forthe turbidity and consistency of the juice causing an increasein its viscosity which hinders its clarification filtration andconcentration [16]
The aim of this research was to replace citric acid withnatural lemon juice an acidifier perceived by the consumersas a more natural or ecological additive In this study lemonjuice obtained from Interdonato variety was treated withthree different enzymes (Rapidase Intense Novoferm 61and Novozym 33095) and three enzyme concentrations asdepectinization processes to produce clear lemon juice andconcentrates In addition according to the data obtainedin laboratory conditions the most appropriate process wascarried out in production lines of fruit juice plant (AnadoluEtap Inc) in our region (Cukurova Turkey) In this plantclarified lemon juice was produced Effects of the processingsteps on some quality parameters were investigated duringthe lemon juice production and the obtained concentrateswere stored at minus25∘C for 180 days
2 Materials and Methods
21 Production of Clarified Lemon Juices in Laboratory Scale
211 Juice Processing Lemons (Interdonato) were purchasedfrom a local market (Adana Turkey) and were washed
Lemon
Washing
Extraction
Pulp removal
Pasteurization
Treatment with enzyme
Clarification
Filtration
Concentration
Storage
Figure 1 Production of clear lemon juice
with tap water to remove surface dirt The lemon juicewas extracted by a citrus extractor machine (Can CanCitrus Extractor Machine Turkey) and then rapidly strainedthrough a stainless steel sieve with pore diameter of 3mmto accomplish separation of most of the suspended matterfrom lemon juice The lemon juice was pasteurized at 75∘Cfor 15 s and enzymatically treated with pectolytic enzymepreparation at 35∘C
212 Enzymatic Treatment of Lemon Juice In this studyfor the production of clear lemon juice (Figure 1) enzymesobtained from different companies Rapidase Intense (DSMFood Specialties Beverage Ingredients The Netherlands)Novoferm 61 and Novozym 33095 (Novozyms BagsvaerdDenmark) were used The enzymes were treated in a lab-oratory scale stainless steel tank at 35 plusmn 2∘C and stirredwith constant velocity (65 revmin) Each of the enzymeswas added to the tank at a concentration of 10 120583L100mL20120583L100mL and 40 120583L100mL (100 200 and 400mLtonresp) Pectolytic enzyme preparations were used to breakdown dissolved pectin in raw lemon juice Breaking downdissolved pectin by pectolytic enzyme preparation providesbetter clarification for the production of clear fruit juice byreleasing protein molecules attached to pectin moleculesBreakdown of pectin was observed with alcohol test in 15-minute intervals Following enzymatic treatment the nextstep was applied to the lemon juice clarification process
213 Clarification of Lemon Juice After reaching each incu-bation time (35∘C 15minndash165min) the enzyme treatedlemon juices were immediately heated at 50∘C Bentonitegelatin and kieselsol having negative positive and negativecharges respectively were added to lemon juice for clarifi-cation Bentonite (SIHA-Puranit UF) gelatin (SIHA-Gelatin
Journal of Food Processing 3
Fine Granules type A 80ndash100 bloom) and kieselsol (Levasil200 SiO
2 30 Food Grade) were supplied by Targıd Inc
(Turkey) Preliminary experiments were carried out for theamounts of bentonite (5) gelatin (1) and kieselsol (Levasil20030) which were determined as 35 Lton 2 Lton and2 Lton lemon juice respectively The lemon juice was incu-bated (35∘C) for 2 hours by mixing 5 d (110 revmin) Initiallyto ensure homogeneous distribution the fining agents werestirred and then were incubated for aggregation withoutstirring
The clarification of the lemon juice was carried out usinglaboratory scale filtration unit with filter paper plate (Minifil-troF6 200 times 200mm Enotecnica Pillan Snc Italy) Clarifiedlemon juices were concentrated in a rotary evaporator undervacuum (Heidolph Basic Eei-VAP HL Germany) at 60∘CThe clarified juice was concentrated using a rotary vacuumevaporator until it reached about 45∘ brix Each experimentwas carried out in three replications Samples of concentrateclear lemon juice were stored at minus25∘C for 180 days in brownbottles and were analyzed in two-month intervals
214 Production of Lemon Juice in Fruit Juice Plant As aresult of the data obtained from laboratory results consider-ing both amount of enzymes used and enzymation time thebest appropriate enzymation conditions were carried out inproduction lines of fruit juice plant (Anadolu Etap Inc) inour region (Cukurova Turkey) In this plant clarified lemonjuice was produced by using Novozym 33095 (200mLton(20120583L100mL)) at 35∘C Enzymation was carried out in a 6-ton tank for 30min Clarification fining agents were added inamounts of bentonite (5) gelatin (1) and kieselsol (Levasil20030) which were determined as 35 Lton 2 Lton and2 Lton lemon juice respectively
In the production of clear lemon juice concentrate theproduction stages were extraction pulp removing pasteur-ization enzymation clarification filtration (rotary vacuumfilter kieselguhr filter and paper filter) and evaporation(TASTE evaporator 95∘C 700mmHg under vacuum)respectively Samples from production stages were takenthree times All concentrate samples were stored at minus25∘C for180 days in brown bottles and were analyzed in two-monthintervals
Lemon juice concentrates (concentrate samples werediluted to 9∘ brix and then analyses were made) producedin the laboratory and in the factory were subjected to thefollowing analyses
22 Determination of Turbidity The turbidity of the clarifiedlemon juices was determined using a portable turbidimeter(WTW Turb550 Germany) and results were reported innephelometric turbidity units (NTU)
23 Determination of Viscosity The viscosity of clarifiedlemon juices was determined using a Brookfield viscometer(Model DV-II+Pro Brookfield Engineering Laboratory IncMiddleboro USA) at 100 rpm with spindle 62
24 Determination of Pectin Degradation (Alcohol Test)Alcohol test was used to verify pectin degradation after
enzyme treatmentThis test was used both for process controland for determining the optimum enzyme dosage Two176 volumes (10mL) of acidified ethanol (add 1mL of 37hydrochloric acid to 100mL of 96 177 ethanol) were addedto one volume (5mL) of lemon juice For each samplebreakdown of pectin was observed with alcohol test in 15-minute intervals [17]
25 Determination of Total Pectin Content Total pectin inthe clear lemon juice samples was determined according tothe method described by List et al [18] Standard graphicswere prepared as 10 20 30 40 50 60 and 70 120583gmL fromgalacturonic acid anhydride
26 Determination of PME Activity PME activity of thesample was carried out by modifying the method of Kimball[19] For the measurement of PME activity 10mL of lemonjuice was mixed with 20mL of 1 pectin-salt substrate (01MNaCl) and incubated at 30∘C during analysis The solutionwas adjusted to pH 70 with 20 N NaOH and then the pHof solution was readjusted to pH 77 with 005 NNaOH Afterthe pH reached 77 010mL of 005 NNaOHwas added Timewas measured (1199051015840) until pH of the solution regained pH of 77PME activity () was calculated by the following formulaswhere (1199051015840) is time in min 119860
0is PME activity of the untreated
sample which was determined immediately after processingto avoid the effects of storage time and 119860
119905is PME activity
after the treatments PME activity (119860) was calculated by thefollowing equation
119860 =
(005119873 minusNaOH) sdot (010mL minusNaOH)(119905
1015840
) (10 minusmL sample)
Residual PME Activity () = (119860
119905
119860
0
) 100
(1)
3 Results and Discussion
31 Pectin Degradation in Lemon Juices Pectin degradationwas observed during depectinization with the alcohol test in15-minute intervals In figures (Figures 2 3 and 4) belongingto enzymation (+) sign means that enzymation is still inprogress (o) sign means enzymation is undecided case and(minus) sign means enzymation is over
Rapidase Intense In enzyme applications in the samples of10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started at theend of 120 minutes and at the end of 135 minutes negativeresults were obtained In the samples of 20 120583L100mL con-centration undecided case started at the end of 60 minutesand negative results were obtained at the end of 75minutes Inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration undecided casestarted at the end of 30 minutes and negative results wereobtained at the end of 45 minutes (Figure 2)
Novoferm 61 In enzyme applications in the samples of10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started at theend of 150 minutes and at the end of 165 minutes negativeresults were obtained In the samples of 20 120583L100mL con-centration undecided case started at the end of 60 minutes
4 Journal of Food Processing
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ +
o
o
o135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 2 Rapidase Intense enzyme application (enzymation is stillin progress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o
oo
165
150
135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 3 Novoferm 61 enzyme application (enzymation is still inprogress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
and negative results were obtained at the end of 75minutes Inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration undecided casestarted at the end of 45 minutes and negative results wereobtained at the end of 60 minutes (Figure 3)
Novozym 33095 In enzyme application in the test resultsof 10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started atthe end of 60 minutes and at the end of 75 minutes nega-tive results were obtained In the samples of 20120583L100mLconcentration negative results were obtained at the end of30 minutes In the samples of 40 120583L100mL concentrationnegative results were obtained at the end of 15 minutes(Figure 4)
According to the findings obtained from pectin degra-dation Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon mostquickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes Novozym 33095was determined as themost effective enzyme for depectiniza-tion followed by Novoferm 61 and Rapidase Intense Whenselecting an enzyme for depectinization in fruit juice indus-try economic as well as rapid activity should be requiredWhen enzymation occurs slowly important quality losses canbe brought about due to oxidation and unwanted fermen-tation For this reason fruit juice companies are obliged todetermine enzyme and dosage between pectin degradation
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+ +
o
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 4 Novozym 33095 enzyme application (enzymation is stillin progress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
speed of enzyme and economy of the enzyme which willprovide a balance without compromising on quality
32 Total Pectin Contents of Lemon Juices As shown inTable 1 after extraction total pectin contents of lemon juicesranged from 11645 to 12177 GA-AH mgL For each ofthe three enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions of total pectin contents were found statisticallysignificant (119875 lt 001) Amount of total pectin contents afterpulp separation process ranged from 10364 to 10615 GA-AH mgL Reduction of total pectin contents was consideredto be expected because of using a 3mm stainless steel sievein pulp separation process Increases were determined intotal pectin content with pasteurization But changes oftotal pectin contents were found statistically insignificantbetween the pulp separation and pasteurization treatmentsDemirdoven and Baysal [20] studied optimization of ohmicheating applications for pectinmethylesterase inactivation inorange juice and found 4103 plusmn 11 GA-AH mgL pectincontent at 95∘C for 60 s application In our examples similarslight increases were determined with pasteurization Afterthe enzyme treatment total pectin contents decreased rapidlyand were determined to be 300ndash1580 GA-AH mgL forRapidase 938ndash2917 GA-AH for Novoferm and 61mgLand 000-000 GA-AH mgL for Novozym 33095 It wasthought that all of the enzymes at this stage resulted in theexpected performance Novozym 33095 degraded pectin inlemon juice better than the other two enzymes Increasingthe enzyme concentration caused more decrease in totalpectin contents Pectin was not determined in clarificationand filtration stages for the different concentrations of thethree enzymes
In the factory total pectin content of clear lemon juiceproduced by Novozym 33095 was determined to be 13213GA-AHmgL in extraction stage 8052 GA-AHmgL in pulpseparation stage and 6862 GA-AH mgL in pasteurizationstage A decrease in the total pectin content in the pulpseparation stage was higher than in laboratory productionwhich could be related to a more effective pulp separationprocess with the three-stage finisher systems that the factoryused Decreasing the total pectin content in pasteurizationstage was found to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001)
Journal of Food Processing 5
Table1To
talp
ectin
contento
flem
onjuices
(GA-AHmgL)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a13213plusmn309
a
Pulpremoval10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b8052plusmn592
b
Paste
urization10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b6862plusmn137
c
Enzymation
1380plusmn19
5cA
584plusmn13
6cB
300plusmn076
dB2917plusmn404
cA1521plusmn
065
cB93
8plusmn039
cC000
c000
c000
c000
d
Clarificatio
n000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Paperfi
lter
000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)im
portance
6 Journal of Food Processing
Total pectin was not determined in the enzyme treatmentuntil the end of paper filter stage 20120583L100mL concentrationof Novozym 33095 used in the plant was also carried outsuccessfully in the depectinization and clarification processes(Table 1)
Both clear lemon juice concentrates were produced inlaboratory and in factory Total pectin analyses were carriedout every two months during the 180-day storage but pectinwas not determined
Wang et al [21] studied quantitation of bioactive com-pounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwan and determinedtotal pectin and water-soluble pectin in the edible portions oflemon and found 606 plusmn 267 (mgg db) total pectin contentand 312 plusmn 107 (mgg db) water-soluble pectin contentrespectively
33 Viscosity Values of Lemon Juices As shown in Table 2viscosity values after extraction of lemon juices ranged from2690 to 2922 cP in laboratory production After pulp sepa-ration decreasing the viscosity for each of the three enzymeapplications was determined to be statistically significant(119875 lt 001) After pulp separation values of viscosity rangedfrom 2130 to 2589 cP Rough particles of pulp (membraneparticles of segment particles of the central axis sacs and par-ticles and particles detached from kernel and albedo) wereremoved using 3 mm stainless steel sieve in pulp separationprocess so values of viscosity decreased Value of viscosity inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration decreased morethan the other concentrations at the depectinization stage Atthis stage viscosity values of changes in Rapidase Intense andNovoferm 61 application were found statistically significantin different enzyme concentrations (119875 lt 001) The largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined in filtrationwith removal of elements of turbidity as expected (119875 lt 001)Viscosity values of clear lemon juices in filtration rangedfrom 1510 to 1744 cP at laboratory production Upon enzymetreatment degradation of pectin leads to a reduction ofwater holding capacity Free water is released to the systemand hence the viscosity of the juice is reduced Thereforeto enhance filtration process performance fruit juices areusually pretreated with enzyme before filtration for thepurpose of hydrolysing soluble polysaccharides responsiblefor high viscosity [22 23]
Viscosity values of lemon juice samples in factory pro-duction are shown in Table 2 Viscosity values in factorywere much lower than our laboratory production at the pulpseparation stage because plant has a more effective pulp sep-aration system than our sieve After the pasteurization stagechanging of viscosity was found insignificant In the output ofpaper filter viscosity value was decreased to 16 cP Sanchez-Moreno et al [24] reported that viscosity value of freshorange juices was found to be 2778 cp and that of pasteurized(90∘C1min) orange juices was found to be 1793 cP Esteve etal [25] investigated the effect of storage period under variableconditions on the chemical and physical composition andcolor of Spanish refrigerated orange juices They reportedviscosity values ranging from 243 to 313mPas
Viscosity values of clear lemon juice concentrates at labo-ratory production were determined and the numbers ranged
from 3310 to 3587 cP during storage (Table 3) Viscosityvalues of clear lemon juice concentrates ranged from 3210to 3340 cP in factory production In both laboratory andfactory production changes in viscosity value of concentratesamples were determined to be statistically insignificantduring storage Also in lemon juice concentrates producedin the laboratory using different enzymes concentrationsin each storage period of the changes were not statisticallysignificant
34 Turbidity Values of Lemon Juice Turbidity values ofclear lemon juice are given in Table 4 After the extractionstage NTU values of lemon juices ranged from 107505 to104115 in laboratory production There was no significantchange from extraction process to enzymation process inNTU values After the clarification stage NTU values werefound to decrease significantly (119875 lt 001) and ranged from975 to 2307 Values of NTU at clarification stage were higherthan the filtration stage due to addition of fining agents Afterthe filtration stage NTU values were again decreased andranged between 028 and 036 NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 (Table 4)
NTU values of clear lemon juice treated with Novozym33095 (20120583L100mL) produced in the factory ranged from733 to 105167 from extraction stage to clarification stageIn factory after addition of fining agents lemon juice wasgiven direct rotary vacuum filter without holding in clar-ification stage Therefore the NTU value in clarificationstage increased Value of NTU was measured to be 1060257 and 001 at end of rotary vacuum filter kieselguhr andpaper filter respectively NTU values produced in the factorywere determined to be lower than those produced in thelaboratory The three-stage filtration was thought to lead tosuch a result
NTU values of all samples of clear lemon juice concen-trates were increased at the storage and this increase wasfound statistically significant (119875 lt 001 119875 lt 005)
NTU values of clear lemon juice concentrates rangedfrom 021 to 058 by applying Rapidase Intense ranged from029 to 066 by applying Novoferm 61 and ranged from 018to 051 by applying Novozym 33095 (Table 5) The lowestNTU values were found to be 40 120583L100mL in Novozym33095 application Although NTU values of clear lemonjuice samples produced in our study were increased withconcentration and storage NTU value was determined to beless than reported 00-10 bright clear and crystal clear juiceAlso NTU value of diluted concentrate is unaccepted morethan 20 at international trade of apple juice concentrate [26ndash28]
35 PMEActivity Values of Lemon Juice Residual PME activ-ity of lemon juices after the pulp separation was determinedto decrease between 8177 and 8815 (Table 6) ResidualPME activity of each of the three enzymes and their con-centrations together with production stages was observed todecreaseThedifference between the stages of productionwasfound to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001) Enzymatic
Journal of Food Processing 7
Table2Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juices
()
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
Pulpremoval
8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b99
5plusmn424
b
Paste
urization
1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1425plusmn12
5cd
1425plusmn12
5c1425plusmn12
5c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c16
1plusmn008
c
Enzymation
944plusmn439
dA92
3plusmn084
dA1007plusmn15
8dA
1791plusmn483
cA1553plusmn118c
A1516plusmn17
5cA
1001plusmn
123c
A95
3plusmn061
cA816plusmn14
2cdA
179plusmn025
c
Clarificatio
n813plusmn13
9dA
955plusmn331
dA682plusmn038
eA1307plusmn034
cdA
1009plusmn391
cA735plusmn214
dA92
1plusmn14
1cA819plusmn061
cA718plusmn081
cdA
152plusmn027
c
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash219plusmn013
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash202plusmn019
c
Paperfi
lter
806plusmn10
4dA
746plusmn18
5dA
529plusmn081
eA92
2plusmn15
8dA
980plusmn521
cA682plusmn008
dA76
5plusmn071
cA805plusmn074
cA609plusmn026
eA18
5plusmn024
c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
8 Journal of Food Processing
Table3Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates()
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
098plusmn037
bA042plusmn001
aA076plusmn007
aA113plusmn012
abA
050plusmn000
aB049plusmn000
aBmdash
mdashmdash
039plusmn002
a
60th
day
045plusmn004
cA044plusmn001
aA068plusmn022
aA169plusmn081
aAlowast
042plusmn002
aBlowast
052plusmn002
aBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash032plusmn004
b
90th
day
142plusmn009
aA019plusmn001
bC075plusmn008
aB068plusmn014
bcA
056plusmn003
aA049plusmn001
aAmdash
mdashmdash
041plusmn004
a
180thday
041plusmn002
cA014plusmn000
cC021plusmn002
bB030plusmn003
cBlowast
069plusmn026
aAlowast
029plusmn004
bBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash028plusmn001
b
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 9
Table4Viscosity
values
oflemon
juices
(cP)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a3376plusmn13
5aPu
lpremoval
2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
ab2120plusmn259
b
Paste
urization
2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
ab1600plusmn060
c
Enzymation
2110plusmn14
5bB
2290plusmn047
bA2080plusmn295
bB2207plusmn042
cA1930plusmn288
cAB
1737plusmn095
deB
2217plusmn14
5bA
2230plusmn047
bA2070plusmn295
bcA
1740plusmn075
c
Clarificatio
n2010plusmn115b
A2180plusmn030
bA2060plusmn375
bA2160plusmn030
cA1943plusmn021
cB1787plusmn075
dC2150plusmn115b
A2233plusmn030
bA2050plusmn375
bcA
1820plusmn12
5cRo
tary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1750plusmn036
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1747plusmn023
c
Paperfi
lter
1608plusmn092
cA1744plusmn035
cA1648plusmn075
cA1670plusmn096
dA1510plusmn096
dA1520plusmn046
eA1720plusmn092
cA1630plusmn035
cA1670plusmn075
cA1630plusmn13
1c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
2 Journal of Food Processing
clear and stable fruit juice is a complete enzymatic breakdownof pectin Pectins make the clarification process harderbecause of their fiber-like molecular structure Enzymes(particularly pectinases) can play a key role in improvingjuice clarity and stability as well as reducing the viscosityTheprocess of depectinization involves the use of commercialenzymes generally a blend of pectinases (eg pectinasepectinesterase polygalacturonase cellulase and pectin lyase)to degrade pectic substances These enzymes degrade pectininto smaller units Pectinase hydrolyzes pectin and causespectin-protein complexes to flocculate Polygalacturonasedepolymerises the polygalacturonic acid chain via breakingdown a-14 glycosidic bond while pectin lyase depolymerisesthe high esterified (approx 65 plusmn 98) pectin pectin esterasehydrolyses the methoxy group of the pectin chain Theresulting juice from this pectinase treatment will have amuchlower amount of pectin and lower viscosity which will beadvantageous in facilitating the subsequent filtration pro-cesses [13]
Clarification is an important processing step used by thelemon juice industry Clarification is necessary in order toobtain a bright clear product with low viscosity Clarificationof juice involves the use of bentonite gelatin and silica solas fining agents These three components bentonite gelatinand silica sol have successfully been applied for an efficientclarification
Viscosity is one of themost important physical propertiesof a fluid system [14] Viscosity cloud stability and other foodproperties are affected by the impact of pectic enzymes par-ticularly pectinmethylesterase (PME) a ubiquitous enzymein plants that deesterifies the methoxylated pectin in theplant cell wall PME is released into juice during extractionPME hydrolyses ester bonds of pectin in citrus juices result-ing in decreased cloud stability [15] Pectin is responsible forthe turbidity and consistency of the juice causing an increasein its viscosity which hinders its clarification filtration andconcentration [16]
The aim of this research was to replace citric acid withnatural lemon juice an acidifier perceived by the consumersas a more natural or ecological additive In this study lemonjuice obtained from Interdonato variety was treated withthree different enzymes (Rapidase Intense Novoferm 61and Novozym 33095) and three enzyme concentrations asdepectinization processes to produce clear lemon juice andconcentrates In addition according to the data obtainedin laboratory conditions the most appropriate process wascarried out in production lines of fruit juice plant (AnadoluEtap Inc) in our region (Cukurova Turkey) In this plantclarified lemon juice was produced Effects of the processingsteps on some quality parameters were investigated duringthe lemon juice production and the obtained concentrateswere stored at minus25∘C for 180 days
2 Materials and Methods
21 Production of Clarified Lemon Juices in Laboratory Scale
211 Juice Processing Lemons (Interdonato) were purchasedfrom a local market (Adana Turkey) and were washed
Lemon
Washing
Extraction
Pulp removal
Pasteurization
Treatment with enzyme
Clarification
Filtration
Concentration
Storage
Figure 1 Production of clear lemon juice
with tap water to remove surface dirt The lemon juicewas extracted by a citrus extractor machine (Can CanCitrus Extractor Machine Turkey) and then rapidly strainedthrough a stainless steel sieve with pore diameter of 3mmto accomplish separation of most of the suspended matterfrom lemon juice The lemon juice was pasteurized at 75∘Cfor 15 s and enzymatically treated with pectolytic enzymepreparation at 35∘C
212 Enzymatic Treatment of Lemon Juice In this studyfor the production of clear lemon juice (Figure 1) enzymesobtained from different companies Rapidase Intense (DSMFood Specialties Beverage Ingredients The Netherlands)Novoferm 61 and Novozym 33095 (Novozyms BagsvaerdDenmark) were used The enzymes were treated in a lab-oratory scale stainless steel tank at 35 plusmn 2∘C and stirredwith constant velocity (65 revmin) Each of the enzymeswas added to the tank at a concentration of 10 120583L100mL20120583L100mL and 40 120583L100mL (100 200 and 400mLtonresp) Pectolytic enzyme preparations were used to breakdown dissolved pectin in raw lemon juice Breaking downdissolved pectin by pectolytic enzyme preparation providesbetter clarification for the production of clear fruit juice byreleasing protein molecules attached to pectin moleculesBreakdown of pectin was observed with alcohol test in 15-minute intervals Following enzymatic treatment the nextstep was applied to the lemon juice clarification process
213 Clarification of Lemon Juice After reaching each incu-bation time (35∘C 15minndash165min) the enzyme treatedlemon juices were immediately heated at 50∘C Bentonitegelatin and kieselsol having negative positive and negativecharges respectively were added to lemon juice for clarifi-cation Bentonite (SIHA-Puranit UF) gelatin (SIHA-Gelatin
Journal of Food Processing 3
Fine Granules type A 80ndash100 bloom) and kieselsol (Levasil200 SiO
2 30 Food Grade) were supplied by Targıd Inc
(Turkey) Preliminary experiments were carried out for theamounts of bentonite (5) gelatin (1) and kieselsol (Levasil20030) which were determined as 35 Lton 2 Lton and2 Lton lemon juice respectively The lemon juice was incu-bated (35∘C) for 2 hours by mixing 5 d (110 revmin) Initiallyto ensure homogeneous distribution the fining agents werestirred and then were incubated for aggregation withoutstirring
The clarification of the lemon juice was carried out usinglaboratory scale filtration unit with filter paper plate (Minifil-troF6 200 times 200mm Enotecnica Pillan Snc Italy) Clarifiedlemon juices were concentrated in a rotary evaporator undervacuum (Heidolph Basic Eei-VAP HL Germany) at 60∘CThe clarified juice was concentrated using a rotary vacuumevaporator until it reached about 45∘ brix Each experimentwas carried out in three replications Samples of concentrateclear lemon juice were stored at minus25∘C for 180 days in brownbottles and were analyzed in two-month intervals
214 Production of Lemon Juice in Fruit Juice Plant As aresult of the data obtained from laboratory results consider-ing both amount of enzymes used and enzymation time thebest appropriate enzymation conditions were carried out inproduction lines of fruit juice plant (Anadolu Etap Inc) inour region (Cukurova Turkey) In this plant clarified lemonjuice was produced by using Novozym 33095 (200mLton(20120583L100mL)) at 35∘C Enzymation was carried out in a 6-ton tank for 30min Clarification fining agents were added inamounts of bentonite (5) gelatin (1) and kieselsol (Levasil20030) which were determined as 35 Lton 2 Lton and2 Lton lemon juice respectively
In the production of clear lemon juice concentrate theproduction stages were extraction pulp removing pasteur-ization enzymation clarification filtration (rotary vacuumfilter kieselguhr filter and paper filter) and evaporation(TASTE evaporator 95∘C 700mmHg under vacuum)respectively Samples from production stages were takenthree times All concentrate samples were stored at minus25∘C for180 days in brown bottles and were analyzed in two-monthintervals
Lemon juice concentrates (concentrate samples werediluted to 9∘ brix and then analyses were made) producedin the laboratory and in the factory were subjected to thefollowing analyses
22 Determination of Turbidity The turbidity of the clarifiedlemon juices was determined using a portable turbidimeter(WTW Turb550 Germany) and results were reported innephelometric turbidity units (NTU)
23 Determination of Viscosity The viscosity of clarifiedlemon juices was determined using a Brookfield viscometer(Model DV-II+Pro Brookfield Engineering Laboratory IncMiddleboro USA) at 100 rpm with spindle 62
24 Determination of Pectin Degradation (Alcohol Test)Alcohol test was used to verify pectin degradation after
enzyme treatmentThis test was used both for process controland for determining the optimum enzyme dosage Two176 volumes (10mL) of acidified ethanol (add 1mL of 37hydrochloric acid to 100mL of 96 177 ethanol) were addedto one volume (5mL) of lemon juice For each samplebreakdown of pectin was observed with alcohol test in 15-minute intervals [17]
25 Determination of Total Pectin Content Total pectin inthe clear lemon juice samples was determined according tothe method described by List et al [18] Standard graphicswere prepared as 10 20 30 40 50 60 and 70 120583gmL fromgalacturonic acid anhydride
26 Determination of PME Activity PME activity of thesample was carried out by modifying the method of Kimball[19] For the measurement of PME activity 10mL of lemonjuice was mixed with 20mL of 1 pectin-salt substrate (01MNaCl) and incubated at 30∘C during analysis The solutionwas adjusted to pH 70 with 20 N NaOH and then the pHof solution was readjusted to pH 77 with 005 NNaOH Afterthe pH reached 77 010mL of 005 NNaOHwas added Timewas measured (1199051015840) until pH of the solution regained pH of 77PME activity () was calculated by the following formulaswhere (1199051015840) is time in min 119860
0is PME activity of the untreated
sample which was determined immediately after processingto avoid the effects of storage time and 119860
119905is PME activity
after the treatments PME activity (119860) was calculated by thefollowing equation
119860 =
(005119873 minusNaOH) sdot (010mL minusNaOH)(119905
1015840
) (10 minusmL sample)
Residual PME Activity () = (119860
119905
119860
0
) 100
(1)
3 Results and Discussion
31 Pectin Degradation in Lemon Juices Pectin degradationwas observed during depectinization with the alcohol test in15-minute intervals In figures (Figures 2 3 and 4) belongingto enzymation (+) sign means that enzymation is still inprogress (o) sign means enzymation is undecided case and(minus) sign means enzymation is over
Rapidase Intense In enzyme applications in the samples of10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started at theend of 120 minutes and at the end of 135 minutes negativeresults were obtained In the samples of 20 120583L100mL con-centration undecided case started at the end of 60 minutesand negative results were obtained at the end of 75minutes Inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration undecided casestarted at the end of 30 minutes and negative results wereobtained at the end of 45 minutes (Figure 2)
Novoferm 61 In enzyme applications in the samples of10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started at theend of 150 minutes and at the end of 165 minutes negativeresults were obtained In the samples of 20 120583L100mL con-centration undecided case started at the end of 60 minutes
4 Journal of Food Processing
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ +
o
o
o135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 2 Rapidase Intense enzyme application (enzymation is stillin progress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o
oo
165
150
135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 3 Novoferm 61 enzyme application (enzymation is still inprogress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
and negative results were obtained at the end of 75minutes Inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration undecided casestarted at the end of 45 minutes and negative results wereobtained at the end of 60 minutes (Figure 3)
Novozym 33095 In enzyme application in the test resultsof 10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started atthe end of 60 minutes and at the end of 75 minutes nega-tive results were obtained In the samples of 20120583L100mLconcentration negative results were obtained at the end of30 minutes In the samples of 40 120583L100mL concentrationnegative results were obtained at the end of 15 minutes(Figure 4)
According to the findings obtained from pectin degra-dation Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon mostquickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes Novozym 33095was determined as themost effective enzyme for depectiniza-tion followed by Novoferm 61 and Rapidase Intense Whenselecting an enzyme for depectinization in fruit juice indus-try economic as well as rapid activity should be requiredWhen enzymation occurs slowly important quality losses canbe brought about due to oxidation and unwanted fermen-tation For this reason fruit juice companies are obliged todetermine enzyme and dosage between pectin degradation
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+ +
o
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 4 Novozym 33095 enzyme application (enzymation is stillin progress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
speed of enzyme and economy of the enzyme which willprovide a balance without compromising on quality
32 Total Pectin Contents of Lemon Juices As shown inTable 1 after extraction total pectin contents of lemon juicesranged from 11645 to 12177 GA-AH mgL For each ofthe three enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions of total pectin contents were found statisticallysignificant (119875 lt 001) Amount of total pectin contents afterpulp separation process ranged from 10364 to 10615 GA-AH mgL Reduction of total pectin contents was consideredto be expected because of using a 3mm stainless steel sievein pulp separation process Increases were determined intotal pectin content with pasteurization But changes oftotal pectin contents were found statistically insignificantbetween the pulp separation and pasteurization treatmentsDemirdoven and Baysal [20] studied optimization of ohmicheating applications for pectinmethylesterase inactivation inorange juice and found 4103 plusmn 11 GA-AH mgL pectincontent at 95∘C for 60 s application In our examples similarslight increases were determined with pasteurization Afterthe enzyme treatment total pectin contents decreased rapidlyand were determined to be 300ndash1580 GA-AH mgL forRapidase 938ndash2917 GA-AH for Novoferm and 61mgLand 000-000 GA-AH mgL for Novozym 33095 It wasthought that all of the enzymes at this stage resulted in theexpected performance Novozym 33095 degraded pectin inlemon juice better than the other two enzymes Increasingthe enzyme concentration caused more decrease in totalpectin contents Pectin was not determined in clarificationand filtration stages for the different concentrations of thethree enzymes
In the factory total pectin content of clear lemon juiceproduced by Novozym 33095 was determined to be 13213GA-AHmgL in extraction stage 8052 GA-AHmgL in pulpseparation stage and 6862 GA-AH mgL in pasteurizationstage A decrease in the total pectin content in the pulpseparation stage was higher than in laboratory productionwhich could be related to a more effective pulp separationprocess with the three-stage finisher systems that the factoryused Decreasing the total pectin content in pasteurizationstage was found to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001)
Journal of Food Processing 5
Table1To
talp
ectin
contento
flem
onjuices
(GA-AHmgL)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a13213plusmn309
a
Pulpremoval10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b8052plusmn592
b
Paste
urization10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b6862plusmn137
c
Enzymation
1380plusmn19
5cA
584plusmn13
6cB
300plusmn076
dB2917plusmn404
cA1521plusmn
065
cB93
8plusmn039
cC000
c000
c000
c000
d
Clarificatio
n000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Paperfi
lter
000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)im
portance
6 Journal of Food Processing
Total pectin was not determined in the enzyme treatmentuntil the end of paper filter stage 20120583L100mL concentrationof Novozym 33095 used in the plant was also carried outsuccessfully in the depectinization and clarification processes(Table 1)
Both clear lemon juice concentrates were produced inlaboratory and in factory Total pectin analyses were carriedout every two months during the 180-day storage but pectinwas not determined
Wang et al [21] studied quantitation of bioactive com-pounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwan and determinedtotal pectin and water-soluble pectin in the edible portions oflemon and found 606 plusmn 267 (mgg db) total pectin contentand 312 plusmn 107 (mgg db) water-soluble pectin contentrespectively
33 Viscosity Values of Lemon Juices As shown in Table 2viscosity values after extraction of lemon juices ranged from2690 to 2922 cP in laboratory production After pulp sepa-ration decreasing the viscosity for each of the three enzymeapplications was determined to be statistically significant(119875 lt 001) After pulp separation values of viscosity rangedfrom 2130 to 2589 cP Rough particles of pulp (membraneparticles of segment particles of the central axis sacs and par-ticles and particles detached from kernel and albedo) wereremoved using 3 mm stainless steel sieve in pulp separationprocess so values of viscosity decreased Value of viscosity inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration decreased morethan the other concentrations at the depectinization stage Atthis stage viscosity values of changes in Rapidase Intense andNovoferm 61 application were found statistically significantin different enzyme concentrations (119875 lt 001) The largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined in filtrationwith removal of elements of turbidity as expected (119875 lt 001)Viscosity values of clear lemon juices in filtration rangedfrom 1510 to 1744 cP at laboratory production Upon enzymetreatment degradation of pectin leads to a reduction ofwater holding capacity Free water is released to the systemand hence the viscosity of the juice is reduced Thereforeto enhance filtration process performance fruit juices areusually pretreated with enzyme before filtration for thepurpose of hydrolysing soluble polysaccharides responsiblefor high viscosity [22 23]
Viscosity values of lemon juice samples in factory pro-duction are shown in Table 2 Viscosity values in factorywere much lower than our laboratory production at the pulpseparation stage because plant has a more effective pulp sep-aration system than our sieve After the pasteurization stagechanging of viscosity was found insignificant In the output ofpaper filter viscosity value was decreased to 16 cP Sanchez-Moreno et al [24] reported that viscosity value of freshorange juices was found to be 2778 cp and that of pasteurized(90∘C1min) orange juices was found to be 1793 cP Esteve etal [25] investigated the effect of storage period under variableconditions on the chemical and physical composition andcolor of Spanish refrigerated orange juices They reportedviscosity values ranging from 243 to 313mPas
Viscosity values of clear lemon juice concentrates at labo-ratory production were determined and the numbers ranged
from 3310 to 3587 cP during storage (Table 3) Viscosityvalues of clear lemon juice concentrates ranged from 3210to 3340 cP in factory production In both laboratory andfactory production changes in viscosity value of concentratesamples were determined to be statistically insignificantduring storage Also in lemon juice concentrates producedin the laboratory using different enzymes concentrationsin each storage period of the changes were not statisticallysignificant
34 Turbidity Values of Lemon Juice Turbidity values ofclear lemon juice are given in Table 4 After the extractionstage NTU values of lemon juices ranged from 107505 to104115 in laboratory production There was no significantchange from extraction process to enzymation process inNTU values After the clarification stage NTU values werefound to decrease significantly (119875 lt 001) and ranged from975 to 2307 Values of NTU at clarification stage were higherthan the filtration stage due to addition of fining agents Afterthe filtration stage NTU values were again decreased andranged between 028 and 036 NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 (Table 4)
NTU values of clear lemon juice treated with Novozym33095 (20120583L100mL) produced in the factory ranged from733 to 105167 from extraction stage to clarification stageIn factory after addition of fining agents lemon juice wasgiven direct rotary vacuum filter without holding in clar-ification stage Therefore the NTU value in clarificationstage increased Value of NTU was measured to be 1060257 and 001 at end of rotary vacuum filter kieselguhr andpaper filter respectively NTU values produced in the factorywere determined to be lower than those produced in thelaboratory The three-stage filtration was thought to lead tosuch a result
NTU values of all samples of clear lemon juice concen-trates were increased at the storage and this increase wasfound statistically significant (119875 lt 001 119875 lt 005)
NTU values of clear lemon juice concentrates rangedfrom 021 to 058 by applying Rapidase Intense ranged from029 to 066 by applying Novoferm 61 and ranged from 018to 051 by applying Novozym 33095 (Table 5) The lowestNTU values were found to be 40 120583L100mL in Novozym33095 application Although NTU values of clear lemonjuice samples produced in our study were increased withconcentration and storage NTU value was determined to beless than reported 00-10 bright clear and crystal clear juiceAlso NTU value of diluted concentrate is unaccepted morethan 20 at international trade of apple juice concentrate [26ndash28]
35 PMEActivity Values of Lemon Juice Residual PME activ-ity of lemon juices after the pulp separation was determinedto decrease between 8177 and 8815 (Table 6) ResidualPME activity of each of the three enzymes and their con-centrations together with production stages was observed todecreaseThedifference between the stages of productionwasfound to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001) Enzymatic
Journal of Food Processing 7
Table2Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juices
()
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
Pulpremoval
8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b99
5plusmn424
b
Paste
urization
1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1425plusmn12
5cd
1425plusmn12
5c1425plusmn12
5c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c16
1plusmn008
c
Enzymation
944plusmn439
dA92
3plusmn084
dA1007plusmn15
8dA
1791plusmn483
cA1553plusmn118c
A1516plusmn17
5cA
1001plusmn
123c
A95
3plusmn061
cA816plusmn14
2cdA
179plusmn025
c
Clarificatio
n813plusmn13
9dA
955plusmn331
dA682plusmn038
eA1307plusmn034
cdA
1009plusmn391
cA735plusmn214
dA92
1plusmn14
1cA819plusmn061
cA718plusmn081
cdA
152plusmn027
c
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash219plusmn013
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash202plusmn019
c
Paperfi
lter
806plusmn10
4dA
746plusmn18
5dA
529plusmn081
eA92
2plusmn15
8dA
980plusmn521
cA682plusmn008
dA76
5plusmn071
cA805plusmn074
cA609plusmn026
eA18
5plusmn024
c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
8 Journal of Food Processing
Table3Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates()
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
098plusmn037
bA042plusmn001
aA076plusmn007
aA113plusmn012
abA
050plusmn000
aB049plusmn000
aBmdash
mdashmdash
039plusmn002
a
60th
day
045plusmn004
cA044plusmn001
aA068plusmn022
aA169plusmn081
aAlowast
042plusmn002
aBlowast
052plusmn002
aBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash032plusmn004
b
90th
day
142plusmn009
aA019plusmn001
bC075plusmn008
aB068plusmn014
bcA
056plusmn003
aA049plusmn001
aAmdash
mdashmdash
041plusmn004
a
180thday
041plusmn002
cA014plusmn000
cC021plusmn002
bB030plusmn003
cBlowast
069plusmn026
aAlowast
029plusmn004
bBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash028plusmn001
b
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 9
Table4Viscosity
values
oflemon
juices
(cP)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a3376plusmn13
5aPu
lpremoval
2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
ab2120plusmn259
b
Paste
urization
2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
ab1600plusmn060
c
Enzymation
2110plusmn14
5bB
2290plusmn047
bA2080plusmn295
bB2207plusmn042
cA1930plusmn288
cAB
1737plusmn095
deB
2217plusmn14
5bA
2230plusmn047
bA2070plusmn295
bcA
1740plusmn075
c
Clarificatio
n2010plusmn115b
A2180plusmn030
bA2060plusmn375
bA2160plusmn030
cA1943plusmn021
cB1787plusmn075
dC2150plusmn115b
A2233plusmn030
bA2050plusmn375
bcA
1820plusmn12
5cRo
tary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1750plusmn036
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1747plusmn023
c
Paperfi
lter
1608plusmn092
cA1744plusmn035
cA1648plusmn075
cA1670plusmn096
dA1510plusmn096
dA1520plusmn046
eA1720plusmn092
cA1630plusmn035
cA1670plusmn075
cA1630plusmn13
1c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
Journal of Food Processing 3
Fine Granules type A 80ndash100 bloom) and kieselsol (Levasil200 SiO
2 30 Food Grade) were supplied by Targıd Inc
(Turkey) Preliminary experiments were carried out for theamounts of bentonite (5) gelatin (1) and kieselsol (Levasil20030) which were determined as 35 Lton 2 Lton and2 Lton lemon juice respectively The lemon juice was incu-bated (35∘C) for 2 hours by mixing 5 d (110 revmin) Initiallyto ensure homogeneous distribution the fining agents werestirred and then were incubated for aggregation withoutstirring
The clarification of the lemon juice was carried out usinglaboratory scale filtration unit with filter paper plate (Minifil-troF6 200 times 200mm Enotecnica Pillan Snc Italy) Clarifiedlemon juices were concentrated in a rotary evaporator undervacuum (Heidolph Basic Eei-VAP HL Germany) at 60∘CThe clarified juice was concentrated using a rotary vacuumevaporator until it reached about 45∘ brix Each experimentwas carried out in three replications Samples of concentrateclear lemon juice were stored at minus25∘C for 180 days in brownbottles and were analyzed in two-month intervals
214 Production of Lemon Juice in Fruit Juice Plant As aresult of the data obtained from laboratory results consider-ing both amount of enzymes used and enzymation time thebest appropriate enzymation conditions were carried out inproduction lines of fruit juice plant (Anadolu Etap Inc) inour region (Cukurova Turkey) In this plant clarified lemonjuice was produced by using Novozym 33095 (200mLton(20120583L100mL)) at 35∘C Enzymation was carried out in a 6-ton tank for 30min Clarification fining agents were added inamounts of bentonite (5) gelatin (1) and kieselsol (Levasil20030) which were determined as 35 Lton 2 Lton and2 Lton lemon juice respectively
In the production of clear lemon juice concentrate theproduction stages were extraction pulp removing pasteur-ization enzymation clarification filtration (rotary vacuumfilter kieselguhr filter and paper filter) and evaporation(TASTE evaporator 95∘C 700mmHg under vacuum)respectively Samples from production stages were takenthree times All concentrate samples were stored at minus25∘C for180 days in brown bottles and were analyzed in two-monthintervals
Lemon juice concentrates (concentrate samples werediluted to 9∘ brix and then analyses were made) producedin the laboratory and in the factory were subjected to thefollowing analyses
22 Determination of Turbidity The turbidity of the clarifiedlemon juices was determined using a portable turbidimeter(WTW Turb550 Germany) and results were reported innephelometric turbidity units (NTU)
23 Determination of Viscosity The viscosity of clarifiedlemon juices was determined using a Brookfield viscometer(Model DV-II+Pro Brookfield Engineering Laboratory IncMiddleboro USA) at 100 rpm with spindle 62
24 Determination of Pectin Degradation (Alcohol Test)Alcohol test was used to verify pectin degradation after
enzyme treatmentThis test was used both for process controland for determining the optimum enzyme dosage Two176 volumes (10mL) of acidified ethanol (add 1mL of 37hydrochloric acid to 100mL of 96 177 ethanol) were addedto one volume (5mL) of lemon juice For each samplebreakdown of pectin was observed with alcohol test in 15-minute intervals [17]
25 Determination of Total Pectin Content Total pectin inthe clear lemon juice samples was determined according tothe method described by List et al [18] Standard graphicswere prepared as 10 20 30 40 50 60 and 70 120583gmL fromgalacturonic acid anhydride
26 Determination of PME Activity PME activity of thesample was carried out by modifying the method of Kimball[19] For the measurement of PME activity 10mL of lemonjuice was mixed with 20mL of 1 pectin-salt substrate (01MNaCl) and incubated at 30∘C during analysis The solutionwas adjusted to pH 70 with 20 N NaOH and then the pHof solution was readjusted to pH 77 with 005 NNaOH Afterthe pH reached 77 010mL of 005 NNaOHwas added Timewas measured (1199051015840) until pH of the solution regained pH of 77PME activity () was calculated by the following formulaswhere (1199051015840) is time in min 119860
0is PME activity of the untreated
sample which was determined immediately after processingto avoid the effects of storage time and 119860
119905is PME activity
after the treatments PME activity (119860) was calculated by thefollowing equation
119860 =
(005119873 minusNaOH) sdot (010mL minusNaOH)(119905
1015840
) (10 minusmL sample)
Residual PME Activity () = (119860
119905
119860
0
) 100
(1)
3 Results and Discussion
31 Pectin Degradation in Lemon Juices Pectin degradationwas observed during depectinization with the alcohol test in15-minute intervals In figures (Figures 2 3 and 4) belongingto enzymation (+) sign means that enzymation is still inprogress (o) sign means enzymation is undecided case and(minus) sign means enzymation is over
Rapidase Intense In enzyme applications in the samples of10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started at theend of 120 minutes and at the end of 135 minutes negativeresults were obtained In the samples of 20 120583L100mL con-centration undecided case started at the end of 60 minutesand negative results were obtained at the end of 75minutes Inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration undecided casestarted at the end of 30 minutes and negative results wereobtained at the end of 45 minutes (Figure 2)
Novoferm 61 In enzyme applications in the samples of10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started at theend of 150 minutes and at the end of 165 minutes negativeresults were obtained In the samples of 20 120583L100mL con-centration undecided case started at the end of 60 minutes
4 Journal of Food Processing
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ +
o
o
o135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 2 Rapidase Intense enzyme application (enzymation is stillin progress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o
oo
165
150
135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 3 Novoferm 61 enzyme application (enzymation is still inprogress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
and negative results were obtained at the end of 75minutes Inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration undecided casestarted at the end of 45 minutes and negative results wereobtained at the end of 60 minutes (Figure 3)
Novozym 33095 In enzyme application in the test resultsof 10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started atthe end of 60 minutes and at the end of 75 minutes nega-tive results were obtained In the samples of 20120583L100mLconcentration negative results were obtained at the end of30 minutes In the samples of 40 120583L100mL concentrationnegative results were obtained at the end of 15 minutes(Figure 4)
According to the findings obtained from pectin degra-dation Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon mostquickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes Novozym 33095was determined as themost effective enzyme for depectiniza-tion followed by Novoferm 61 and Rapidase Intense Whenselecting an enzyme for depectinization in fruit juice indus-try economic as well as rapid activity should be requiredWhen enzymation occurs slowly important quality losses canbe brought about due to oxidation and unwanted fermen-tation For this reason fruit juice companies are obliged todetermine enzyme and dosage between pectin degradation
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+ +
o
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 4 Novozym 33095 enzyme application (enzymation is stillin progress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
speed of enzyme and economy of the enzyme which willprovide a balance without compromising on quality
32 Total Pectin Contents of Lemon Juices As shown inTable 1 after extraction total pectin contents of lemon juicesranged from 11645 to 12177 GA-AH mgL For each ofthe three enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions of total pectin contents were found statisticallysignificant (119875 lt 001) Amount of total pectin contents afterpulp separation process ranged from 10364 to 10615 GA-AH mgL Reduction of total pectin contents was consideredto be expected because of using a 3mm stainless steel sievein pulp separation process Increases were determined intotal pectin content with pasteurization But changes oftotal pectin contents were found statistically insignificantbetween the pulp separation and pasteurization treatmentsDemirdoven and Baysal [20] studied optimization of ohmicheating applications for pectinmethylesterase inactivation inorange juice and found 4103 plusmn 11 GA-AH mgL pectincontent at 95∘C for 60 s application In our examples similarslight increases were determined with pasteurization Afterthe enzyme treatment total pectin contents decreased rapidlyand were determined to be 300ndash1580 GA-AH mgL forRapidase 938ndash2917 GA-AH for Novoferm and 61mgLand 000-000 GA-AH mgL for Novozym 33095 It wasthought that all of the enzymes at this stage resulted in theexpected performance Novozym 33095 degraded pectin inlemon juice better than the other two enzymes Increasingthe enzyme concentration caused more decrease in totalpectin contents Pectin was not determined in clarificationand filtration stages for the different concentrations of thethree enzymes
In the factory total pectin content of clear lemon juiceproduced by Novozym 33095 was determined to be 13213GA-AHmgL in extraction stage 8052 GA-AHmgL in pulpseparation stage and 6862 GA-AH mgL in pasteurizationstage A decrease in the total pectin content in the pulpseparation stage was higher than in laboratory productionwhich could be related to a more effective pulp separationprocess with the three-stage finisher systems that the factoryused Decreasing the total pectin content in pasteurizationstage was found to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001)
Journal of Food Processing 5
Table1To
talp
ectin
contento
flem
onjuices
(GA-AHmgL)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a13213plusmn309
a
Pulpremoval10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b8052plusmn592
b
Paste
urization10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b6862plusmn137
c
Enzymation
1380plusmn19
5cA
584plusmn13
6cB
300plusmn076
dB2917plusmn404
cA1521plusmn
065
cB93
8plusmn039
cC000
c000
c000
c000
d
Clarificatio
n000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Paperfi
lter
000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)im
portance
6 Journal of Food Processing
Total pectin was not determined in the enzyme treatmentuntil the end of paper filter stage 20120583L100mL concentrationof Novozym 33095 used in the plant was also carried outsuccessfully in the depectinization and clarification processes(Table 1)
Both clear lemon juice concentrates were produced inlaboratory and in factory Total pectin analyses were carriedout every two months during the 180-day storage but pectinwas not determined
Wang et al [21] studied quantitation of bioactive com-pounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwan and determinedtotal pectin and water-soluble pectin in the edible portions oflemon and found 606 plusmn 267 (mgg db) total pectin contentand 312 plusmn 107 (mgg db) water-soluble pectin contentrespectively
33 Viscosity Values of Lemon Juices As shown in Table 2viscosity values after extraction of lemon juices ranged from2690 to 2922 cP in laboratory production After pulp sepa-ration decreasing the viscosity for each of the three enzymeapplications was determined to be statistically significant(119875 lt 001) After pulp separation values of viscosity rangedfrom 2130 to 2589 cP Rough particles of pulp (membraneparticles of segment particles of the central axis sacs and par-ticles and particles detached from kernel and albedo) wereremoved using 3 mm stainless steel sieve in pulp separationprocess so values of viscosity decreased Value of viscosity inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration decreased morethan the other concentrations at the depectinization stage Atthis stage viscosity values of changes in Rapidase Intense andNovoferm 61 application were found statistically significantin different enzyme concentrations (119875 lt 001) The largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined in filtrationwith removal of elements of turbidity as expected (119875 lt 001)Viscosity values of clear lemon juices in filtration rangedfrom 1510 to 1744 cP at laboratory production Upon enzymetreatment degradation of pectin leads to a reduction ofwater holding capacity Free water is released to the systemand hence the viscosity of the juice is reduced Thereforeto enhance filtration process performance fruit juices areusually pretreated with enzyme before filtration for thepurpose of hydrolysing soluble polysaccharides responsiblefor high viscosity [22 23]
Viscosity values of lemon juice samples in factory pro-duction are shown in Table 2 Viscosity values in factorywere much lower than our laboratory production at the pulpseparation stage because plant has a more effective pulp sep-aration system than our sieve After the pasteurization stagechanging of viscosity was found insignificant In the output ofpaper filter viscosity value was decreased to 16 cP Sanchez-Moreno et al [24] reported that viscosity value of freshorange juices was found to be 2778 cp and that of pasteurized(90∘C1min) orange juices was found to be 1793 cP Esteve etal [25] investigated the effect of storage period under variableconditions on the chemical and physical composition andcolor of Spanish refrigerated orange juices They reportedviscosity values ranging from 243 to 313mPas
Viscosity values of clear lemon juice concentrates at labo-ratory production were determined and the numbers ranged
from 3310 to 3587 cP during storage (Table 3) Viscosityvalues of clear lemon juice concentrates ranged from 3210to 3340 cP in factory production In both laboratory andfactory production changes in viscosity value of concentratesamples were determined to be statistically insignificantduring storage Also in lemon juice concentrates producedin the laboratory using different enzymes concentrationsin each storage period of the changes were not statisticallysignificant
34 Turbidity Values of Lemon Juice Turbidity values ofclear lemon juice are given in Table 4 After the extractionstage NTU values of lemon juices ranged from 107505 to104115 in laboratory production There was no significantchange from extraction process to enzymation process inNTU values After the clarification stage NTU values werefound to decrease significantly (119875 lt 001) and ranged from975 to 2307 Values of NTU at clarification stage were higherthan the filtration stage due to addition of fining agents Afterthe filtration stage NTU values were again decreased andranged between 028 and 036 NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 (Table 4)
NTU values of clear lemon juice treated with Novozym33095 (20120583L100mL) produced in the factory ranged from733 to 105167 from extraction stage to clarification stageIn factory after addition of fining agents lemon juice wasgiven direct rotary vacuum filter without holding in clar-ification stage Therefore the NTU value in clarificationstage increased Value of NTU was measured to be 1060257 and 001 at end of rotary vacuum filter kieselguhr andpaper filter respectively NTU values produced in the factorywere determined to be lower than those produced in thelaboratory The three-stage filtration was thought to lead tosuch a result
NTU values of all samples of clear lemon juice concen-trates were increased at the storage and this increase wasfound statistically significant (119875 lt 001 119875 lt 005)
NTU values of clear lemon juice concentrates rangedfrom 021 to 058 by applying Rapidase Intense ranged from029 to 066 by applying Novoferm 61 and ranged from 018to 051 by applying Novozym 33095 (Table 5) The lowestNTU values were found to be 40 120583L100mL in Novozym33095 application Although NTU values of clear lemonjuice samples produced in our study were increased withconcentration and storage NTU value was determined to beless than reported 00-10 bright clear and crystal clear juiceAlso NTU value of diluted concentrate is unaccepted morethan 20 at international trade of apple juice concentrate [26ndash28]
35 PMEActivity Values of Lemon Juice Residual PME activ-ity of lemon juices after the pulp separation was determinedto decrease between 8177 and 8815 (Table 6) ResidualPME activity of each of the three enzymes and their con-centrations together with production stages was observed todecreaseThedifference between the stages of productionwasfound to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001) Enzymatic
Journal of Food Processing 7
Table2Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juices
()
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
Pulpremoval
8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b99
5plusmn424
b
Paste
urization
1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1425plusmn12
5cd
1425plusmn12
5c1425plusmn12
5c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c16
1plusmn008
c
Enzymation
944plusmn439
dA92
3plusmn084
dA1007plusmn15
8dA
1791plusmn483
cA1553plusmn118c
A1516plusmn17
5cA
1001plusmn
123c
A95
3plusmn061
cA816plusmn14
2cdA
179plusmn025
c
Clarificatio
n813plusmn13
9dA
955plusmn331
dA682plusmn038
eA1307plusmn034
cdA
1009plusmn391
cA735plusmn214
dA92
1plusmn14
1cA819plusmn061
cA718plusmn081
cdA
152plusmn027
c
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash219plusmn013
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash202plusmn019
c
Paperfi
lter
806plusmn10
4dA
746plusmn18
5dA
529plusmn081
eA92
2plusmn15
8dA
980plusmn521
cA682plusmn008
dA76
5plusmn071
cA805plusmn074
cA609plusmn026
eA18
5plusmn024
c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
8 Journal of Food Processing
Table3Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates()
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
098plusmn037
bA042plusmn001
aA076plusmn007
aA113plusmn012
abA
050plusmn000
aB049plusmn000
aBmdash
mdashmdash
039plusmn002
a
60th
day
045plusmn004
cA044plusmn001
aA068plusmn022
aA169plusmn081
aAlowast
042plusmn002
aBlowast
052plusmn002
aBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash032plusmn004
b
90th
day
142plusmn009
aA019plusmn001
bC075plusmn008
aB068plusmn014
bcA
056plusmn003
aA049plusmn001
aAmdash
mdashmdash
041plusmn004
a
180thday
041plusmn002
cA014plusmn000
cC021plusmn002
bB030plusmn003
cBlowast
069plusmn026
aAlowast
029plusmn004
bBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash028plusmn001
b
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 9
Table4Viscosity
values
oflemon
juices
(cP)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a3376plusmn13
5aPu
lpremoval
2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
ab2120plusmn259
b
Paste
urization
2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
ab1600plusmn060
c
Enzymation
2110plusmn14
5bB
2290plusmn047
bA2080plusmn295
bB2207plusmn042
cA1930plusmn288
cAB
1737plusmn095
deB
2217plusmn14
5bA
2230plusmn047
bA2070plusmn295
bcA
1740plusmn075
c
Clarificatio
n2010plusmn115b
A2180plusmn030
bA2060plusmn375
bA2160plusmn030
cA1943plusmn021
cB1787plusmn075
dC2150plusmn115b
A2233plusmn030
bA2050plusmn375
bcA
1820plusmn12
5cRo
tary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1750plusmn036
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1747plusmn023
c
Paperfi
lter
1608plusmn092
cA1744plusmn035
cA1648plusmn075
cA1670plusmn096
dA1510plusmn096
dA1520plusmn046
eA1720plusmn092
cA1630plusmn035
cA1670plusmn075
cA1630plusmn13
1c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
4 Journal of Food Processing
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ +
o
o
o135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 2 Rapidase Intense enzyme application (enzymation is stillin progress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
o
oo
165
150
135
120
105
90
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 3 Novoferm 61 enzyme application (enzymation is still inprogress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
and negative results were obtained at the end of 75minutes Inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration undecided casestarted at the end of 45 minutes and negative results wereobtained at the end of 60 minutes (Figure 3)
Novozym 33095 In enzyme application in the test resultsof 10 120583L100mL concentrations undecided case started atthe end of 60 minutes and at the end of 75 minutes nega-tive results were obtained In the samples of 20120583L100mLconcentration negative results were obtained at the end of30 minutes In the samples of 40 120583L100mL concentrationnegative results were obtained at the end of 15 minutes(Figure 4)
According to the findings obtained from pectin degra-dation Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon mostquickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes Novozym 33095was determined as themost effective enzyme for depectiniza-tion followed by Novoferm 61 and Rapidase Intense Whenselecting an enzyme for depectinization in fruit juice indus-try economic as well as rapid activity should be requiredWhen enzymation occurs slowly important quality losses canbe brought about due to oxidation and unwanted fermen-tation For this reason fruit juice companies are obliged todetermine enzyme and dosage between pectin degradation
minus minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
minus
+
+
+ +
o
75
60
45
30
15
0
0 10 20 40
Tim
e (m
in)
Concentration (120583L100mL)
Figure 4 Novozym 33095 enzyme application (enzymation is stillin progress (+) undecided case (o) and over (minus))
speed of enzyme and economy of the enzyme which willprovide a balance without compromising on quality
32 Total Pectin Contents of Lemon Juices As shown inTable 1 after extraction total pectin contents of lemon juicesranged from 11645 to 12177 GA-AH mgL For each ofthe three enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions of total pectin contents were found statisticallysignificant (119875 lt 001) Amount of total pectin contents afterpulp separation process ranged from 10364 to 10615 GA-AH mgL Reduction of total pectin contents was consideredto be expected because of using a 3mm stainless steel sievein pulp separation process Increases were determined intotal pectin content with pasteurization But changes oftotal pectin contents were found statistically insignificantbetween the pulp separation and pasteurization treatmentsDemirdoven and Baysal [20] studied optimization of ohmicheating applications for pectinmethylesterase inactivation inorange juice and found 4103 plusmn 11 GA-AH mgL pectincontent at 95∘C for 60 s application In our examples similarslight increases were determined with pasteurization Afterthe enzyme treatment total pectin contents decreased rapidlyand were determined to be 300ndash1580 GA-AH mgL forRapidase 938ndash2917 GA-AH for Novoferm and 61mgLand 000-000 GA-AH mgL for Novozym 33095 It wasthought that all of the enzymes at this stage resulted in theexpected performance Novozym 33095 degraded pectin inlemon juice better than the other two enzymes Increasingthe enzyme concentration caused more decrease in totalpectin contents Pectin was not determined in clarificationand filtration stages for the different concentrations of thethree enzymes
In the factory total pectin content of clear lemon juiceproduced by Novozym 33095 was determined to be 13213GA-AHmgL in extraction stage 8052 GA-AHmgL in pulpseparation stage and 6862 GA-AH mgL in pasteurizationstage A decrease in the total pectin content in the pulpseparation stage was higher than in laboratory productionwhich could be related to a more effective pulp separationprocess with the three-stage finisher systems that the factoryused Decreasing the total pectin content in pasteurizationstage was found to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001)
Journal of Food Processing 5
Table1To
talp
ectin
contento
flem
onjuices
(GA-AHmgL)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a13213plusmn309
a
Pulpremoval10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b8052plusmn592
b
Paste
urization10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b6862plusmn137
c
Enzymation
1380plusmn19
5cA
584plusmn13
6cB
300plusmn076
dB2917plusmn404
cA1521plusmn
065
cB93
8plusmn039
cC000
c000
c000
c000
d
Clarificatio
n000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Paperfi
lter
000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)im
portance
6 Journal of Food Processing
Total pectin was not determined in the enzyme treatmentuntil the end of paper filter stage 20120583L100mL concentrationof Novozym 33095 used in the plant was also carried outsuccessfully in the depectinization and clarification processes(Table 1)
Both clear lemon juice concentrates were produced inlaboratory and in factory Total pectin analyses were carriedout every two months during the 180-day storage but pectinwas not determined
Wang et al [21] studied quantitation of bioactive com-pounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwan and determinedtotal pectin and water-soluble pectin in the edible portions oflemon and found 606 plusmn 267 (mgg db) total pectin contentand 312 plusmn 107 (mgg db) water-soluble pectin contentrespectively
33 Viscosity Values of Lemon Juices As shown in Table 2viscosity values after extraction of lemon juices ranged from2690 to 2922 cP in laboratory production After pulp sepa-ration decreasing the viscosity for each of the three enzymeapplications was determined to be statistically significant(119875 lt 001) After pulp separation values of viscosity rangedfrom 2130 to 2589 cP Rough particles of pulp (membraneparticles of segment particles of the central axis sacs and par-ticles and particles detached from kernel and albedo) wereremoved using 3 mm stainless steel sieve in pulp separationprocess so values of viscosity decreased Value of viscosity inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration decreased morethan the other concentrations at the depectinization stage Atthis stage viscosity values of changes in Rapidase Intense andNovoferm 61 application were found statistically significantin different enzyme concentrations (119875 lt 001) The largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined in filtrationwith removal of elements of turbidity as expected (119875 lt 001)Viscosity values of clear lemon juices in filtration rangedfrom 1510 to 1744 cP at laboratory production Upon enzymetreatment degradation of pectin leads to a reduction ofwater holding capacity Free water is released to the systemand hence the viscosity of the juice is reduced Thereforeto enhance filtration process performance fruit juices areusually pretreated with enzyme before filtration for thepurpose of hydrolysing soluble polysaccharides responsiblefor high viscosity [22 23]
Viscosity values of lemon juice samples in factory pro-duction are shown in Table 2 Viscosity values in factorywere much lower than our laboratory production at the pulpseparation stage because plant has a more effective pulp sep-aration system than our sieve After the pasteurization stagechanging of viscosity was found insignificant In the output ofpaper filter viscosity value was decreased to 16 cP Sanchez-Moreno et al [24] reported that viscosity value of freshorange juices was found to be 2778 cp and that of pasteurized(90∘C1min) orange juices was found to be 1793 cP Esteve etal [25] investigated the effect of storage period under variableconditions on the chemical and physical composition andcolor of Spanish refrigerated orange juices They reportedviscosity values ranging from 243 to 313mPas
Viscosity values of clear lemon juice concentrates at labo-ratory production were determined and the numbers ranged
from 3310 to 3587 cP during storage (Table 3) Viscosityvalues of clear lemon juice concentrates ranged from 3210to 3340 cP in factory production In both laboratory andfactory production changes in viscosity value of concentratesamples were determined to be statistically insignificantduring storage Also in lemon juice concentrates producedin the laboratory using different enzymes concentrationsin each storage period of the changes were not statisticallysignificant
34 Turbidity Values of Lemon Juice Turbidity values ofclear lemon juice are given in Table 4 After the extractionstage NTU values of lemon juices ranged from 107505 to104115 in laboratory production There was no significantchange from extraction process to enzymation process inNTU values After the clarification stage NTU values werefound to decrease significantly (119875 lt 001) and ranged from975 to 2307 Values of NTU at clarification stage were higherthan the filtration stage due to addition of fining agents Afterthe filtration stage NTU values were again decreased andranged between 028 and 036 NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 (Table 4)
NTU values of clear lemon juice treated with Novozym33095 (20120583L100mL) produced in the factory ranged from733 to 105167 from extraction stage to clarification stageIn factory after addition of fining agents lemon juice wasgiven direct rotary vacuum filter without holding in clar-ification stage Therefore the NTU value in clarificationstage increased Value of NTU was measured to be 1060257 and 001 at end of rotary vacuum filter kieselguhr andpaper filter respectively NTU values produced in the factorywere determined to be lower than those produced in thelaboratory The three-stage filtration was thought to lead tosuch a result
NTU values of all samples of clear lemon juice concen-trates were increased at the storage and this increase wasfound statistically significant (119875 lt 001 119875 lt 005)
NTU values of clear lemon juice concentrates rangedfrom 021 to 058 by applying Rapidase Intense ranged from029 to 066 by applying Novoferm 61 and ranged from 018to 051 by applying Novozym 33095 (Table 5) The lowestNTU values were found to be 40 120583L100mL in Novozym33095 application Although NTU values of clear lemonjuice samples produced in our study were increased withconcentration and storage NTU value was determined to beless than reported 00-10 bright clear and crystal clear juiceAlso NTU value of diluted concentrate is unaccepted morethan 20 at international trade of apple juice concentrate [26ndash28]
35 PMEActivity Values of Lemon Juice Residual PME activ-ity of lemon juices after the pulp separation was determinedto decrease between 8177 and 8815 (Table 6) ResidualPME activity of each of the three enzymes and their con-centrations together with production stages was observed todecreaseThedifference between the stages of productionwasfound to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001) Enzymatic
Journal of Food Processing 7
Table2Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juices
()
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
Pulpremoval
8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b99
5plusmn424
b
Paste
urization
1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1425plusmn12
5cd
1425plusmn12
5c1425plusmn12
5c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c16
1plusmn008
c
Enzymation
944plusmn439
dA92
3plusmn084
dA1007plusmn15
8dA
1791plusmn483
cA1553plusmn118c
A1516plusmn17
5cA
1001plusmn
123c
A95
3plusmn061
cA816plusmn14
2cdA
179plusmn025
c
Clarificatio
n813plusmn13
9dA
955plusmn331
dA682plusmn038
eA1307plusmn034
cdA
1009plusmn391
cA735plusmn214
dA92
1plusmn14
1cA819plusmn061
cA718plusmn081
cdA
152plusmn027
c
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash219plusmn013
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash202plusmn019
c
Paperfi
lter
806plusmn10
4dA
746plusmn18
5dA
529plusmn081
eA92
2plusmn15
8dA
980plusmn521
cA682plusmn008
dA76
5plusmn071
cA805plusmn074
cA609plusmn026
eA18
5plusmn024
c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
8 Journal of Food Processing
Table3Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates()
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
098plusmn037
bA042plusmn001
aA076plusmn007
aA113plusmn012
abA
050plusmn000
aB049plusmn000
aBmdash
mdashmdash
039plusmn002
a
60th
day
045plusmn004
cA044plusmn001
aA068plusmn022
aA169plusmn081
aAlowast
042plusmn002
aBlowast
052plusmn002
aBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash032plusmn004
b
90th
day
142plusmn009
aA019plusmn001
bC075plusmn008
aB068plusmn014
bcA
056plusmn003
aA049plusmn001
aAmdash
mdashmdash
041plusmn004
a
180thday
041plusmn002
cA014plusmn000
cC021plusmn002
bB030plusmn003
cBlowast
069plusmn026
aAlowast
029plusmn004
bBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash028plusmn001
b
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 9
Table4Viscosity
values
oflemon
juices
(cP)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a3376plusmn13
5aPu
lpremoval
2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
ab2120plusmn259
b
Paste
urization
2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
ab1600plusmn060
c
Enzymation
2110plusmn14
5bB
2290plusmn047
bA2080plusmn295
bB2207plusmn042
cA1930plusmn288
cAB
1737plusmn095
deB
2217plusmn14
5bA
2230plusmn047
bA2070plusmn295
bcA
1740plusmn075
c
Clarificatio
n2010plusmn115b
A2180plusmn030
bA2060plusmn375
bA2160plusmn030
cA1943plusmn021
cB1787plusmn075
dC2150plusmn115b
A2233plusmn030
bA2050plusmn375
bcA
1820plusmn12
5cRo
tary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1750plusmn036
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1747plusmn023
c
Paperfi
lter
1608plusmn092
cA1744plusmn035
cA1648plusmn075
cA1670plusmn096
dA1510plusmn096
dA1520plusmn046
eA1720plusmn092
cA1630plusmn035
cA1670plusmn075
cA1630plusmn13
1c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
Journal of Food Processing 5
Table1To
talp
ectin
contento
flem
onjuices
(GA-AHmgL)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a11874plusmn378
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a12177plusmn664
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a11645plusmn977
a13213plusmn309
a
Pulpremoval10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10364plusmn429
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10473plusmn424
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b10615plusmn533
b8052plusmn592
b
Paste
urization10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10753plusmn105
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10570plusmn119
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b10066plusmn198
b6862plusmn137
c
Enzymation
1380plusmn19
5cA
584plusmn13
6cB
300plusmn076
dB2917plusmn404
cA1521plusmn
065
cB93
8plusmn039
cC000
c000
c000
c000
d
Clarificatio
n000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash000
d
Paperfi
lter
000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
d000
c000
c000
c000
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)im
portance
6 Journal of Food Processing
Total pectin was not determined in the enzyme treatmentuntil the end of paper filter stage 20120583L100mL concentrationof Novozym 33095 used in the plant was also carried outsuccessfully in the depectinization and clarification processes(Table 1)
Both clear lemon juice concentrates were produced inlaboratory and in factory Total pectin analyses were carriedout every two months during the 180-day storage but pectinwas not determined
Wang et al [21] studied quantitation of bioactive com-pounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwan and determinedtotal pectin and water-soluble pectin in the edible portions oflemon and found 606 plusmn 267 (mgg db) total pectin contentand 312 plusmn 107 (mgg db) water-soluble pectin contentrespectively
33 Viscosity Values of Lemon Juices As shown in Table 2viscosity values after extraction of lemon juices ranged from2690 to 2922 cP in laboratory production After pulp sepa-ration decreasing the viscosity for each of the three enzymeapplications was determined to be statistically significant(119875 lt 001) After pulp separation values of viscosity rangedfrom 2130 to 2589 cP Rough particles of pulp (membraneparticles of segment particles of the central axis sacs and par-ticles and particles detached from kernel and albedo) wereremoved using 3 mm stainless steel sieve in pulp separationprocess so values of viscosity decreased Value of viscosity inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration decreased morethan the other concentrations at the depectinization stage Atthis stage viscosity values of changes in Rapidase Intense andNovoferm 61 application were found statistically significantin different enzyme concentrations (119875 lt 001) The largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined in filtrationwith removal of elements of turbidity as expected (119875 lt 001)Viscosity values of clear lemon juices in filtration rangedfrom 1510 to 1744 cP at laboratory production Upon enzymetreatment degradation of pectin leads to a reduction ofwater holding capacity Free water is released to the systemand hence the viscosity of the juice is reduced Thereforeto enhance filtration process performance fruit juices areusually pretreated with enzyme before filtration for thepurpose of hydrolysing soluble polysaccharides responsiblefor high viscosity [22 23]
Viscosity values of lemon juice samples in factory pro-duction are shown in Table 2 Viscosity values in factorywere much lower than our laboratory production at the pulpseparation stage because plant has a more effective pulp sep-aration system than our sieve After the pasteurization stagechanging of viscosity was found insignificant In the output ofpaper filter viscosity value was decreased to 16 cP Sanchez-Moreno et al [24] reported that viscosity value of freshorange juices was found to be 2778 cp and that of pasteurized(90∘C1min) orange juices was found to be 1793 cP Esteve etal [25] investigated the effect of storage period under variableconditions on the chemical and physical composition andcolor of Spanish refrigerated orange juices They reportedviscosity values ranging from 243 to 313mPas
Viscosity values of clear lemon juice concentrates at labo-ratory production were determined and the numbers ranged
from 3310 to 3587 cP during storage (Table 3) Viscosityvalues of clear lemon juice concentrates ranged from 3210to 3340 cP in factory production In both laboratory andfactory production changes in viscosity value of concentratesamples were determined to be statistically insignificantduring storage Also in lemon juice concentrates producedin the laboratory using different enzymes concentrationsin each storage period of the changes were not statisticallysignificant
34 Turbidity Values of Lemon Juice Turbidity values ofclear lemon juice are given in Table 4 After the extractionstage NTU values of lemon juices ranged from 107505 to104115 in laboratory production There was no significantchange from extraction process to enzymation process inNTU values After the clarification stage NTU values werefound to decrease significantly (119875 lt 001) and ranged from975 to 2307 Values of NTU at clarification stage were higherthan the filtration stage due to addition of fining agents Afterthe filtration stage NTU values were again decreased andranged between 028 and 036 NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 (Table 4)
NTU values of clear lemon juice treated with Novozym33095 (20120583L100mL) produced in the factory ranged from733 to 105167 from extraction stage to clarification stageIn factory after addition of fining agents lemon juice wasgiven direct rotary vacuum filter without holding in clar-ification stage Therefore the NTU value in clarificationstage increased Value of NTU was measured to be 1060257 and 001 at end of rotary vacuum filter kieselguhr andpaper filter respectively NTU values produced in the factorywere determined to be lower than those produced in thelaboratory The three-stage filtration was thought to lead tosuch a result
NTU values of all samples of clear lemon juice concen-trates were increased at the storage and this increase wasfound statistically significant (119875 lt 001 119875 lt 005)
NTU values of clear lemon juice concentrates rangedfrom 021 to 058 by applying Rapidase Intense ranged from029 to 066 by applying Novoferm 61 and ranged from 018to 051 by applying Novozym 33095 (Table 5) The lowestNTU values were found to be 40 120583L100mL in Novozym33095 application Although NTU values of clear lemonjuice samples produced in our study were increased withconcentration and storage NTU value was determined to beless than reported 00-10 bright clear and crystal clear juiceAlso NTU value of diluted concentrate is unaccepted morethan 20 at international trade of apple juice concentrate [26ndash28]
35 PMEActivity Values of Lemon Juice Residual PME activ-ity of lemon juices after the pulp separation was determinedto decrease between 8177 and 8815 (Table 6) ResidualPME activity of each of the three enzymes and their con-centrations together with production stages was observed todecreaseThedifference between the stages of productionwasfound to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001) Enzymatic
Journal of Food Processing 7
Table2Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juices
()
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
Pulpremoval
8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b99
5plusmn424
b
Paste
urization
1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1425plusmn12
5cd
1425plusmn12
5c1425plusmn12
5c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c16
1plusmn008
c
Enzymation
944plusmn439
dA92
3plusmn084
dA1007plusmn15
8dA
1791plusmn483
cA1553plusmn118c
A1516plusmn17
5cA
1001plusmn
123c
A95
3plusmn061
cA816plusmn14
2cdA
179plusmn025
c
Clarificatio
n813plusmn13
9dA
955plusmn331
dA682plusmn038
eA1307plusmn034
cdA
1009plusmn391
cA735plusmn214
dA92
1plusmn14
1cA819plusmn061
cA718plusmn081
cdA
152plusmn027
c
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash219plusmn013
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash202plusmn019
c
Paperfi
lter
806plusmn10
4dA
746plusmn18
5dA
529plusmn081
eA92
2plusmn15
8dA
980plusmn521
cA682plusmn008
dA76
5plusmn071
cA805plusmn074
cA609plusmn026
eA18
5plusmn024
c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
8 Journal of Food Processing
Table3Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates()
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
098plusmn037
bA042plusmn001
aA076plusmn007
aA113plusmn012
abA
050plusmn000
aB049plusmn000
aBmdash
mdashmdash
039plusmn002
a
60th
day
045plusmn004
cA044plusmn001
aA068plusmn022
aA169plusmn081
aAlowast
042plusmn002
aBlowast
052plusmn002
aBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash032plusmn004
b
90th
day
142plusmn009
aA019plusmn001
bC075plusmn008
aB068plusmn014
bcA
056plusmn003
aA049plusmn001
aAmdash
mdashmdash
041plusmn004
a
180thday
041plusmn002
cA014plusmn000
cC021plusmn002
bB030plusmn003
cBlowast
069plusmn026
aAlowast
029plusmn004
bBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash028plusmn001
b
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 9
Table4Viscosity
values
oflemon
juices
(cP)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a3376plusmn13
5aPu
lpremoval
2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
ab2120plusmn259
b
Paste
urization
2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
ab1600plusmn060
c
Enzymation
2110plusmn14
5bB
2290plusmn047
bA2080plusmn295
bB2207plusmn042
cA1930plusmn288
cAB
1737plusmn095
deB
2217plusmn14
5bA
2230plusmn047
bA2070plusmn295
bcA
1740plusmn075
c
Clarificatio
n2010plusmn115b
A2180plusmn030
bA2060plusmn375
bA2160plusmn030
cA1943plusmn021
cB1787plusmn075
dC2150plusmn115b
A2233plusmn030
bA2050plusmn375
bcA
1820plusmn12
5cRo
tary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1750plusmn036
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1747plusmn023
c
Paperfi
lter
1608plusmn092
cA1744plusmn035
cA1648plusmn075
cA1670plusmn096
dA1510plusmn096
dA1520plusmn046
eA1720plusmn092
cA1630plusmn035
cA1670plusmn075
cA1630plusmn13
1c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
6 Journal of Food Processing
Total pectin was not determined in the enzyme treatmentuntil the end of paper filter stage 20120583L100mL concentrationof Novozym 33095 used in the plant was also carried outsuccessfully in the depectinization and clarification processes(Table 1)
Both clear lemon juice concentrates were produced inlaboratory and in factory Total pectin analyses were carriedout every two months during the 180-day storage but pectinwas not determined
Wang et al [21] studied quantitation of bioactive com-pounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwan and determinedtotal pectin and water-soluble pectin in the edible portions oflemon and found 606 plusmn 267 (mgg db) total pectin contentand 312 plusmn 107 (mgg db) water-soluble pectin contentrespectively
33 Viscosity Values of Lemon Juices As shown in Table 2viscosity values after extraction of lemon juices ranged from2690 to 2922 cP in laboratory production After pulp sepa-ration decreasing the viscosity for each of the three enzymeapplications was determined to be statistically significant(119875 lt 001) After pulp separation values of viscosity rangedfrom 2130 to 2589 cP Rough particles of pulp (membraneparticles of segment particles of the central axis sacs and par-ticles and particles detached from kernel and albedo) wereremoved using 3 mm stainless steel sieve in pulp separationprocess so values of viscosity decreased Value of viscosity inthe samples of 40 120583L100mL concentration decreased morethan the other concentrations at the depectinization stage Atthis stage viscosity values of changes in Rapidase Intense andNovoferm 61 application were found statistically significantin different enzyme concentrations (119875 lt 001) The largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined in filtrationwith removal of elements of turbidity as expected (119875 lt 001)Viscosity values of clear lemon juices in filtration rangedfrom 1510 to 1744 cP at laboratory production Upon enzymetreatment degradation of pectin leads to a reduction ofwater holding capacity Free water is released to the systemand hence the viscosity of the juice is reduced Thereforeto enhance filtration process performance fruit juices areusually pretreated with enzyme before filtration for thepurpose of hydrolysing soluble polysaccharides responsiblefor high viscosity [22 23]
Viscosity values of lemon juice samples in factory pro-duction are shown in Table 2 Viscosity values in factorywere much lower than our laboratory production at the pulpseparation stage because plant has a more effective pulp sep-aration system than our sieve After the pasteurization stagechanging of viscosity was found insignificant In the output ofpaper filter viscosity value was decreased to 16 cP Sanchez-Moreno et al [24] reported that viscosity value of freshorange juices was found to be 2778 cp and that of pasteurized(90∘C1min) orange juices was found to be 1793 cP Esteve etal [25] investigated the effect of storage period under variableconditions on the chemical and physical composition andcolor of Spanish refrigerated orange juices They reportedviscosity values ranging from 243 to 313mPas
Viscosity values of clear lemon juice concentrates at labo-ratory production were determined and the numbers ranged
from 3310 to 3587 cP during storage (Table 3) Viscosityvalues of clear lemon juice concentrates ranged from 3210to 3340 cP in factory production In both laboratory andfactory production changes in viscosity value of concentratesamples were determined to be statistically insignificantduring storage Also in lemon juice concentrates producedin the laboratory using different enzymes concentrationsin each storage period of the changes were not statisticallysignificant
34 Turbidity Values of Lemon Juice Turbidity values ofclear lemon juice are given in Table 4 After the extractionstage NTU values of lemon juices ranged from 107505 to104115 in laboratory production There was no significantchange from extraction process to enzymation process inNTU values After the clarification stage NTU values werefound to decrease significantly (119875 lt 001) and ranged from975 to 2307 Values of NTU at clarification stage were higherthan the filtration stage due to addition of fining agents Afterthe filtration stage NTU values were again decreased andranged between 028 and 036 NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 (Table 4)
NTU values of clear lemon juice treated with Novozym33095 (20120583L100mL) produced in the factory ranged from733 to 105167 from extraction stage to clarification stageIn factory after addition of fining agents lemon juice wasgiven direct rotary vacuum filter without holding in clar-ification stage Therefore the NTU value in clarificationstage increased Value of NTU was measured to be 1060257 and 001 at end of rotary vacuum filter kieselguhr andpaper filter respectively NTU values produced in the factorywere determined to be lower than those produced in thelaboratory The three-stage filtration was thought to lead tosuch a result
NTU values of all samples of clear lemon juice concen-trates were increased at the storage and this increase wasfound statistically significant (119875 lt 001 119875 lt 005)
NTU values of clear lemon juice concentrates rangedfrom 021 to 058 by applying Rapidase Intense ranged from029 to 066 by applying Novoferm 61 and ranged from 018to 051 by applying Novozym 33095 (Table 5) The lowestNTU values were found to be 40 120583L100mL in Novozym33095 application Although NTU values of clear lemonjuice samples produced in our study were increased withconcentration and storage NTU value was determined to beless than reported 00-10 bright clear and crystal clear juiceAlso NTU value of diluted concentrate is unaccepted morethan 20 at international trade of apple juice concentrate [26ndash28]
35 PMEActivity Values of Lemon Juice Residual PME activ-ity of lemon juices after the pulp separation was determinedto decrease between 8177 and 8815 (Table 6) ResidualPME activity of each of the three enzymes and their con-centrations together with production stages was observed todecreaseThedifference between the stages of productionwasfound to be statistically significant (119875 lt 001) Enzymatic
Journal of Food Processing 7
Table2Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juices
()
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
Pulpremoval
8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b99
5plusmn424
b
Paste
urization
1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1425plusmn12
5cd
1425plusmn12
5c1425plusmn12
5c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c16
1plusmn008
c
Enzymation
944plusmn439
dA92
3plusmn084
dA1007plusmn15
8dA
1791plusmn483
cA1553plusmn118c
A1516plusmn17
5cA
1001plusmn
123c
A95
3plusmn061
cA816plusmn14
2cdA
179plusmn025
c
Clarificatio
n813plusmn13
9dA
955plusmn331
dA682plusmn038
eA1307plusmn034
cdA
1009plusmn391
cA735plusmn214
dA92
1plusmn14
1cA819plusmn061
cA718plusmn081
cdA
152plusmn027
c
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash219plusmn013
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash202plusmn019
c
Paperfi
lter
806plusmn10
4dA
746plusmn18
5dA
529plusmn081
eA92
2plusmn15
8dA
980plusmn521
cA682plusmn008
dA76
5plusmn071
cA805plusmn074
cA609plusmn026
eA18
5plusmn024
c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
8 Journal of Food Processing
Table3Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates()
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
098plusmn037
bA042plusmn001
aA076plusmn007
aA113plusmn012
abA
050plusmn000
aB049plusmn000
aBmdash
mdashmdash
039plusmn002
a
60th
day
045plusmn004
cA044plusmn001
aA068plusmn022
aA169plusmn081
aAlowast
042plusmn002
aBlowast
052plusmn002
aBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash032plusmn004
b
90th
day
142plusmn009
aA019plusmn001
bC075plusmn008
aB068plusmn014
bcA
056plusmn003
aA049plusmn001
aAmdash
mdashmdash
041plusmn004
a
180thday
041plusmn002
cA014plusmn000
cC021plusmn002
bB030plusmn003
cBlowast
069plusmn026
aAlowast
029plusmn004
bBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash028plusmn001
b
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 9
Table4Viscosity
values
oflemon
juices
(cP)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a3376plusmn13
5aPu
lpremoval
2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
ab2120plusmn259
b
Paste
urization
2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
ab1600plusmn060
c
Enzymation
2110plusmn14
5bB
2290plusmn047
bA2080plusmn295
bB2207plusmn042
cA1930plusmn288
cAB
1737plusmn095
deB
2217plusmn14
5bA
2230plusmn047
bA2070plusmn295
bcA
1740plusmn075
c
Clarificatio
n2010plusmn115b
A2180plusmn030
bA2060plusmn375
bA2160plusmn030
cA1943plusmn021
cB1787plusmn075
dC2150plusmn115b
A2233plusmn030
bA2050plusmn375
bcA
1820plusmn12
5cRo
tary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1750plusmn036
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1747plusmn023
c
Paperfi
lter
1608plusmn092
cA1744plusmn035
cA1648plusmn075
cA1670plusmn096
dA1510plusmn096
dA1520plusmn046
eA1720plusmn092
cA1630plusmn035
cA1670plusmn075
cA1630plusmn13
1c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
Journal of Food Processing 7
Table2Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juices
()
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
100a
Pulpremoval
8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8587plusmn19
2b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8177plusmn679
b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b8815plusmn76
6b99
5plusmn424
b
Paste
urization
1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1564plusmn15
8c1425plusmn12
5cd
1425plusmn12
5c1425plusmn12
5c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c1309plusmn264
c16
1plusmn008
c
Enzymation
944plusmn439
dA92
3plusmn084
dA1007plusmn15
8dA
1791plusmn483
cA1553plusmn118c
A1516plusmn17
5cA
1001plusmn
123c
A95
3plusmn061
cA816plusmn14
2cdA
179plusmn025
c
Clarificatio
n813plusmn13
9dA
955plusmn331
dA682plusmn038
eA1307plusmn034
cdA
1009plusmn391
cA735plusmn214
dA92
1plusmn14
1cA819plusmn061
cA718plusmn081
cdA
152plusmn027
c
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash219plusmn013
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash202plusmn019
c
Paperfi
lter
806plusmn10
4dA
746plusmn18
5dA
529plusmn081
eA92
2plusmn15
8dA
980plusmn521
cA682plusmn008
dA76
5plusmn071
cA805plusmn074
cA609plusmn026
eA18
5plusmn024
c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
8 Journal of Food Processing
Table3Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates()
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
098plusmn037
bA042plusmn001
aA076plusmn007
aA113plusmn012
abA
050plusmn000
aB049plusmn000
aBmdash
mdashmdash
039plusmn002
a
60th
day
045plusmn004
cA044plusmn001
aA068plusmn022
aA169plusmn081
aAlowast
042plusmn002
aBlowast
052plusmn002
aBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash032plusmn004
b
90th
day
142plusmn009
aA019plusmn001
bC075plusmn008
aB068plusmn014
bcA
056plusmn003
aA049plusmn001
aAmdash
mdashmdash
041plusmn004
a
180thday
041plusmn002
cA014plusmn000
cC021plusmn002
bB030plusmn003
cBlowast
069plusmn026
aAlowast
029plusmn004
bBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash028plusmn001
b
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 9
Table4Viscosity
values
oflemon
juices
(cP)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a3376plusmn13
5aPu
lpremoval
2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
ab2120plusmn259
b
Paste
urization
2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
ab1600plusmn060
c
Enzymation
2110plusmn14
5bB
2290plusmn047
bA2080plusmn295
bB2207plusmn042
cA1930plusmn288
cAB
1737plusmn095
deB
2217plusmn14
5bA
2230plusmn047
bA2070plusmn295
bcA
1740plusmn075
c
Clarificatio
n2010plusmn115b
A2180plusmn030
bA2060plusmn375
bA2160plusmn030
cA1943plusmn021
cB1787plusmn075
dC2150plusmn115b
A2233plusmn030
bA2050plusmn375
bcA
1820plusmn12
5cRo
tary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1750plusmn036
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1747plusmn023
c
Paperfi
lter
1608plusmn092
cA1744plusmn035
cA1648plusmn075
cA1670plusmn096
dA1510plusmn096
dA1520plusmn046
eA1720plusmn092
cA1630plusmn035
cA1670plusmn075
cA1630plusmn13
1c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
8 Journal of Food Processing
Table3Pectinmethyleste
rase
activ
ityvalues
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates()
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
098plusmn037
bA042plusmn001
aA076plusmn007
aA113plusmn012
abA
050plusmn000
aB049plusmn000
aBmdash
mdashmdash
039plusmn002
a
60th
day
045plusmn004
cA044plusmn001
aA068plusmn022
aA169plusmn081
aAlowast
042plusmn002
aBlowast
052plusmn002
aBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash032plusmn004
b
90th
day
142plusmn009
aA019plusmn001
bC075plusmn008
aB068plusmn014
bcA
056plusmn003
aA049plusmn001
aAmdash
mdashmdash
041plusmn004
a
180thday
041plusmn002
cA014plusmn000
cC021plusmn002
bB030plusmn003
cBlowast
069plusmn026
aAlowast
029plusmn004
bBlowast
mdashmdash
mdash028plusmn001
b
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 9
Table4Viscosity
values
oflemon
juices
(cP)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a3376plusmn13
5aPu
lpremoval
2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
ab2120plusmn259
b
Paste
urization
2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
ab1600plusmn060
c
Enzymation
2110plusmn14
5bB
2290plusmn047
bA2080plusmn295
bB2207plusmn042
cA1930plusmn288
cAB
1737plusmn095
deB
2217plusmn14
5bA
2230plusmn047
bA2070plusmn295
bcA
1740plusmn075
c
Clarificatio
n2010plusmn115b
A2180plusmn030
bA2060plusmn375
bA2160plusmn030
cA1943plusmn021
cB1787plusmn075
dC2150plusmn115b
A2233plusmn030
bA2050plusmn375
bcA
1820plusmn12
5cRo
tary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1750plusmn036
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1747plusmn023
c
Paperfi
lter
1608plusmn092
cA1744plusmn035
cA1648plusmn075
cA1670plusmn096
dA1510plusmn096
dA1520plusmn046
eA1720plusmn092
cA1630plusmn035
cA1670plusmn075
cA1630plusmn13
1c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
Journal of Food Processing 9
Table4Viscosity
values
oflemon
juices
(cP)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2790plusmn16
5a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2922plusmn290
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a2690plusmn427
a3376plusmn13
5aPu
lpremoval
2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2130plusmn233
b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2589plusmn13
5b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
b2240plusmn233
ab2120plusmn259
b
Paste
urization
2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2133plusmn032
b2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2220plusmn052
c2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
b2287plusmn032
ab1600plusmn060
c
Enzymation
2110plusmn14
5bB
2290plusmn047
bA2080plusmn295
bB2207plusmn042
cA1930plusmn288
cAB
1737plusmn095
deB
2217plusmn14
5bA
2230plusmn047
bA2070plusmn295
bcA
1740plusmn075
c
Clarificatio
n2010plusmn115b
A2180plusmn030
bA2060plusmn375
bA2160plusmn030
cA1943plusmn021
cB1787plusmn075
dC2150plusmn115b
A2233plusmn030
bA2050plusmn375
bcA
1820plusmn12
5cRo
tary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1750plusmn036
c
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1747plusmn023
c
Paperfi
lter
1608plusmn092
cA1744plusmn035
cA1648plusmn075
cA1670plusmn096
dA1510plusmn096
dA1520plusmn046
eA1720plusmn092
cA1630plusmn035
cA1670plusmn075
cA1630plusmn13
1c
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
10 Journal of Food Processing
Table5Viscosity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(cP)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
3456plusmn10
6aA
3470plusmn036
aA3587plusmn249
aA3580plusmn14
8aA
3560plusmn204
aA3373plusmn068
aA3310plusmn221
aA3480plusmn15
9aA
3500plusmn227
aA3340plusmn082
a
60th
day
3402plusmn041
aA3425plusmn016
aA3400plusmn010
aA3369plusmn039
aA3428plusmn035
aA3432plusmn021
aA3389plusmn025
aA3384plusmn025
aA3463plusmn063
aA3273plusmn050
a
90th
day
3368plusmn046
aA3470plusmn028
aA3377plusmn020
aA3522plusmn069
aA3434plusmn055
aA3404plusmn040
aA3336plusmn033
aA3387plusmn073
aA3442plusmn090
aA3210plusmn079
a
180thday
3405plusmn027
aA3450plusmn018
aA3525plusmn110a
A3488plusmn050
aA3410plusmn042
aA3389plusmn061
aA3351plusmn
038
aA3436plusmn070
aA3352plusmn020
aA3333plusmn10
0a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
Journal of Food Processing 11
Table6Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juices
(NTU
)
Stages
ofprod
uctio
nRa
pidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)Ex
tractio
n104745plusmn2236a
104745plusmn2236a
b104745plusmn2236a
104115plusmn1273a
104115plusmn1273a
b104115plusmn1273a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
107505plusmn6998a
73300plusmn6976
c
Pulpremoval
104338plusmn3097a
104338plusmn3097a
b104338plusmn3097a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
107451plusmn
2928a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
101537plusmn3296a
9190
0plusmn3569b
Paste
urization
102187plusmn6686a
102187plusmn6686b
102187plusmn6686a
103867plusmn5684a
103867plusmn5684a
b103867plusmn5684a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
107732plusmn6792a
100000plusmn000
a
Enzymation
105983plusmn6080a
A108588plusmn1222a
A104521plusmn
6228a
A102998plusmn1121aA
101812plusmn215
bA1040
96plusmn4327a
A102735plusmn1550a
A10526plusmn3307a
A99302plusmn4730a
A100233plusmn1365a
Clarificatio
n2307plusmn77
1bA
1447plusmn323
cA1763plusmn387
bA1870plusmn13
3bA
1835plusmn220
cA1535plusmn529
bA97
5plusmn243
bA1060plusmn020
bA1124plusmn073
bA105167plusmn44
88a
Rotary
vacuum
filter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash1060plusmn020
d
Kieselg
uhrfi
lter
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdashmdash
mdash257plusmn004
d
Paperfi
lter
032plusmn009
bA029plusmn004
cA028plusmn005
bA035plusmn003
bA035plusmn004
cA029plusmn010
bA036plusmn001
bA034plusmn002
bA031plusmn007
bA001plusmn001
d
Smallletters
onthesamecolumnshow
thedifferencebetweenthestages
ofprod
uctio
nup
percased
lette
rsin
thesamerowshow
thedifferencebetweenenzymeconcentrations
fore
achenzymeTh
edifference
betweensta
geof
prod
uctio
nandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)impo
rtance
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
12 Journal of Food Processing
Table7Tu
rbidity
values
oflemon
juicec
oncentrates(NTU
)
Storage
Rapidase
Intense
Novoferm
61Novozym
33095
Factory
prod
uctio
n10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)10
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)40
(120583L100m
L)20
(120583L100m
L)30th
day
032plusmn011
bA025plusmn003
cA021plusmn003
cA035plusmn003
dA034plusmn005
cA029plusmn010
bA026plusmn003
cAlowast
021plusmn003
cABlowast018plusmn001
cBlowast
053plusmn007
c
60th
day
038plusmn014
bA036plusmn002
bA032plusmn003
bA046plusmn004
cAlowast
045plusmn004
bAlowast
031plusmn005
bBlowast
034plusmn003
bA040plusmn005
bA025plusmn002
bB064plusmn004
b
90th
day
047plusmn003
abA
039plusmn004
bA038plusmn006
bA057plusmn003
bAlowast
048plusmn007
abABlowast038plusmn006
abBlowast
044plusmn005
aA049plusmn002
aA032plusmn003
aB071plusmn003
ab
180thday
058plusmn006
aA054plusmn005
aA046plusmn003
aA066plusmn003
aA057plusmn002
aB047plusmn003
aC048plusmn004
aAlowast
051plusmn005
aAlowast
037plusmn005
aBlowast
073plusmn004
a
Smallletterson
thes
amec
olum
nshow
thed
ifference
betweenthes
torage
perio
dsupp
ercasedlette
rsin
thes
amer
owshow
thed
ifference
betweenenzymec
oncentratio
nsfore
achenzymeTh
edifference
between
storage
perio
dsandenzymec
oncentratio
nsisatlevelof0
01(119875lt001)a
ndlowast
005
(119875lt005)impo
rtance
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
Journal of Food Processing 13
application in different concentrations of each enzyme andthe difference between residual PME activity at enzymationclarification and filtration stages were determined to beinsignificant After the filtration stages residual PME activityranged from 529 to 980 in laboratory In factory residualPMEactivitywas significantly decreased after pulp separationstage due to an effective pulp separation with three-stagefinisher system and was determined to be 995 Withpasteurization this value decreased to 161 Residual PMEactivity at end of paper filter was determined to be 185
According to the findings of the residual activity of PMEin both laboratory and factory productions an increasein residual PME activity was not observed at the enzymetreatment These findings indicated that there was not PMEactivity in enzyme solutions obtained from different manu-facturing companies In the case of PME an increase mighthave been expected but no increase was observed in theapplication of each of the enzymes in the enzyme treatment
Residual PME activity of clear lemon juice concentratesranged from 021 to 169 during storage (Table 7) PMEactivity of clear lemon juices decreased to significant lev-els together with the concentration process This can beexplained through heating load and changing with propor-tional increasing of acidity level during the concentrationprocess in isoelectric point of the lemon juice Enzymesare protein structures which quickly react to changes inisoelectric points in lemon juice
Changing of residual PME activity was found to be signif-icant (119875 lt 001) in Rapidase and Novoferm 61 applicationsduring storage But these changes were in small amountsAlthough residual PME activity analyses of concentratesobtained from Novozym 33095 application were done everytwo months during six-month storage residual PME activitywas not observed In concentrates of clear lemon juiceproduced in factory residual PME activity values rangedfrom028 to 041 andwere significantly (119875 lt 001) different
Pectinmethylesterase (PME) is an enzyme of majorimpact on orange juice processing because of its effecton clarification of orange juice or gelation of concentratedorange juice [19 29] Determination of residual PME activitylevel reveals important information about the stability of theproduct [30] Polydera et al [31] applied the heat treatmentto orange juice at 80∘C for 60 s and inactivated 95 of orangejuice PME It has been reported that enzymatic activity ofresidual PME is heat-resistant isoenzymes which were notinactivated even at higher temperatures PME is more ther-mally resistant than vegetative spoilage microorganisms [32]Sentandreu et al [33] reported that residual PME activity wasdetermined to be about 20 residual PME activity in heat-treated samples (mandarin and orange) at 75∘C for 5 10 and20 s and at 80∘C for 5 and 10 s Taking into considerationthe results of the sensory and residual enzyme analysis heattreatment at 85∘ for C 10 s was found to be an appropriateapplication
4 Conclusions
According to the findings obtained from pectin degrada-tion Novozym 33095 degraded the pectin in lemon most
quickly The highest concentration of this enzyme achievedpectin degradation in less than 15 minutes For each of thethree enzyme applications after pulp separation processreductions in the total pectin contents were observed Pectinwas not determined in clarification and filtration stages forthe different concentrations of the three enzymes For bothclear lemon juice concentrates produced in laboratory andin factory total pectin analyses were carried out every twomonths during 180-day storage but pectin was not deter-mined After pulp separation and filtration stages the largestdecrease in the viscosity values was determined at laboratoryproduction of clear lemon juice Values of viscosity weredetermined to display significant decrease in pulp separationand pasteurized samples NTU values of filter exampleswere determined to be 028ndash032 by using Rapidase Intense029ndash035 by using Novoferm 61 and 031ndash036 by usingNovozym 33095 NTU values of all samples of clear lemonjuice concentrate increased during storage NTU values ofclear lemon juice samples produced in our study increasedwith concentration and storage Residual PME activity ofeach of the three enzymes and their concentrations togetherwith production stages was observed to decrease At the endof filtration in 40 120583L100mL concentrations of each of thethree enzymes values of residual PME activity were found tobe in the lowest quantities PME activity of clear lemon juicesamples was determined to decrease together with storage Inclear lemon juice concentrates produced by using Novozym33095 residual PME activity was not observed
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by The Scientific and Technolog-ical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project noTOVAG-110O786)
References
[1] Q Mu X Sun G Zhong X Wang C Song and J FangldquoEmployment of a new strategy for identification of lemonCitrus limon L cultivars using RAPDmarkersrdquoAfrican Journalof Agricultural Research vol 714 pp 2075ndash2082 2012
[2] Faostat ldquoFood and agriculture organization of the unitednations Food and agricultural commodities productionrdquo 2013httpfaostatfaoorgsite339defaultaspx
[3] V Shrivastava L Purwal and U K Jain ldquoIn vitro Pediculicidalactivity of juice of Citrus limonrdquo International Journal ofPharmTech Research vol 2 no 3 pp 1792ndash1795 2010
[4] C Dhuique-Mayer C Caris-Veyrat P Ollitrault F Curk andM-J Amiot ldquoVarietal and interspecific influence on micronu-trient contents in citrus from the mediterranean areardquo Journalof Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53 no 6 pp 2140ndash21452005
[5] L W Morton R A-A Caccetta I B Puddey and K DCroft ldquoChemistry and biological effects of dietary phenoliccompounds relevance to cardiovascular diseaserdquo Clinical and
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
14 Journal of Food Processing
Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology vol 27 no 3 pp152ndash159 2000
[6] N Pellegrini M Serafini B Colombi et al ldquoTotal antioxidantcapacity of plant foods beverages and oils consumed in Italyassessed by three different in vitro assaysrdquo Journal of Nutritionvol 133 no 9 pp 2812ndash2819 2003
[7] E Gonzalez-Molina A Girones-Vilaplana P Mena D AMoreno and C Garcia-Viguera ldquoNew beverages of lemon juicewith elderberry and grape concentrates as a source of bioactivecompoundsrdquo Journal of Food Science vol 77 pp 6727ndash67332012
[8] NMartı A Perez-Vicente andC Garcıa-Viguera ldquoInfluence ofstorage temperature and ascorbic acid addition on pomegranatejuicerdquo Journal of the Science of Food andAgriculture vol 822 pp217ndash221 2001
[9] D Saura N Marti M Valero E Gonzalez A Carbonell andJ Laencina ldquoSeparation of aromatics compounds during theclarification of lemon juice by cross-flow filtrationrdquo IndustrialCrops and Products vol 36 no 1 pp 543ndash548 2012
[10] D Saura J Laencina A J Perez-Lopez V Lizama and A ACarbonell-Barrachina ldquoAroma of canned peach halves acidifiedwith clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 68 no3 pp 1080ndash1085 2003
[11] D Saura N Martı J Laencina V Lizama and A A Carbonell-Barrachina ldquoSensory evaluation of canned peach halves acidi-fied with clarified lemon juicerdquo Journal of Food Science vol 69no 2 pp snq74ndashsnq78 2004
[12] P Rai and S De ldquoClarification of pectin-containing juice usingultrafiltrationrdquo Current Science vol 96 no 10 pp 1361ndash13712009
[13] A RNur lsquoaliaaM K SMazlina and F S Taip ldquoImpact of com-mercial pectolytic enzymes on selected properties of whitedragon fruit juicerdquo Journal of the Institution of Engineers vol714 pp 25ndash31 2010
[14] S G E Giap ldquoThe hidden property of arrhenius-type relation-ship viscosity as a function of temperaturerdquo Journal of PhysicalScience vol 211 pp 29ndash39 2010
[15] B K Tiwari K Muthukumarappan C P OrsquoDonnell and PJ Cullen ldquoInactivation kinetics of pectin methylesterase andcloud retention in sonicated orange juicerdquo Innovative FoodScience and Emerging Technologies vol 10 no 2 pp 166ndash1712009
[16] I Alkorta C Garbisu M J Llama and J L Serra ldquoIndustrialapplications of pectic enzymes a reviewrdquo Process Biochemistryvol 33 no 1 pp 21ndash28 1998
[17] F Will ldquoFruchtsaftkolloide einfluss auf die ultrafiltration undden alkoholtest Moglichkeiten zur Abreicherung in klarenSaftenrdquo Flussiges Obst vol 60 pp 360ndash364 1993
[18] D List S Buddruszlig and M Bodtke ldquoPectinbestimmung mitmeta-phenylphenolrdquo Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchungund Forschung vol 180 no 1 pp 48ndash52 1985
[19] D A Kimball ldquoCitrus processingrdquo in Quality Control andTechnology Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY USA 1991
[20] A Demirdoven and T Baysal ldquoOptimization of ohmic heatingapplications for pectin methylesterase inactivation in orangejuicerdquo Journal of Food Science and Technology pp 1ndash10 2012
[21] Y C Wang Y C Chuang and Y H Ku ldquoQuantitation of bio-active compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in Taiwanrdquo FoodChemistry vol 102 no 4 pp 1163ndash1171 2007
[22] M Cheryan and J R Alvarez ldquoFood and beverage industryapplicationrdquo in Membrane Separation R D Noble and S AStern Eds 1995
[23] A G Liew Abdullah N M Sulaiman M K Aroua andM J Megat Mohd Noor ldquoResponse surface optimization ofconditions for clarification of carambola fruit juice using acommercial enzymerdquo Journal of Food Engineering vol 81 no1 pp 65ndash71 2007
[24] C Sanchez-Moreno L Plaza P Elez-Martınez B de Ancos OMartın-Belloso and M P Cano ldquoImpact of high pressure andpulsed electric fields on bioactive compounds and antioxidantactivity of orange juice in comparison with traditional thermalprocessingrdquo Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry vol 53no 11 pp 4403ndash4409 2005
[25] M J Esteve A Frıgola C Rodrigo and D Rodrigo ldquoEffect ofstorage period under variable conditions on the chemical andphysical composition and colour of Spanish refrigerated orangejuicesrdquo Food and Chemical Toxicology vol 43 no 9 pp 1413ndash1422 2005
[26] R Jung and T Jund ldquoFiltrationsarten zur filtration von fruch-tsaeftenmdashteil 1rdquo Flussiges Obst pp 343ndash347 1997
[27] S T D de Barros C M G Andrade E S Mendes and L PeresldquoStudy of fouling mechanism in pineapple juice clarification byultrafiltrationrdquo Journal ofMembrane Science vol 215 no 1-2 pp213ndash224 2003
[28] B Cemeroglu and F Karadeniz ldquoMeyve suyu uretim teknolo-jisirdquo in Meyve ve Sebze Isleme Teknolojisi B Cemeroglu Edvol 1 pp 297ndash661 Gıda Teknolojisi Dernegi Yayinlari AnkaraTurkiye 2004
[29] S Basak H S Ramaswamy and B K Simpson ldquoHigh pressureinactivation of pectin methyl esterase in orange juice usingcombination treatmentsrdquo Journal of Food Biochemistry vol 25no 6 pp 509ndash526 2001
[30] OKurita T Fujiwara andE Yamazaki ldquoCharacterization of thepectin extracted from citrus peel in the presence of citric acidrdquoCarbohydrate Polymers vol 74 no 3 pp 725ndash730 2008
[31] A C Polydera N G Stoforos and P S Taoukis ldquoThe effect ofstorage on the antioxidant activity of reconstituted orange juicewhich had been pasteurized by high pressure or heatrdquo Inter-national Journal of Food Science and Technology vol 39 no 7pp 783ndash791 2004
[32] C S Chen and M C Wu ldquoKinetic models for thermal inac-tivation of multiple pectinesterases in citrus juicesrdquo Journal ofFood Science vol 63 no 5 pp 747ndash750 1998
[33] E Sentandreu L Carboneil J V Carboneil and L IzquierdoldquoEffects of heat treatment conditions on fresh taste and onpectinmethylesterase activity of chilled mandarin and orangejuicesrdquo Food Science and Technology International vol 11 no 3pp 217ndash222 2005
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Anatomy Research International
PeptidesInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom
International Journal of
Volume 2014
Zoology
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Molecular Biology International
GenomicsInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioinformaticsAdvances in
Marine BiologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Signal TransductionJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
Evolutionary BiologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Biochemistry Research International
ArchaeaHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Genetics Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Advances in
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Nucleic AcidsJournal of
Volume 2014
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Enzyme Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
International Journal of
Microbiology