research article overexpression of foxo3, myd88, and gapdh...
TRANSCRIPT
Research ArticleOverexpression of FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDHIdentified by Suppression Subtractive Hybridizationin Esophageal Cancer Is Associated with Autophagy
Mohammad Soltany-Rezaee-Rad12 Negar Mottaghi-Dastjerdi12 Neda Setayesh1
Gholamreza Roshandel3 Farzaneh Ebrahimifard4 and Zargham Sepehrizadeh1
1 Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Biotechnology Research CenterSchool of Pharmacy Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran 1417614411 Iran
2 Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center Sari School of Pharmacy Mazandaran University of Medical SciencesSari 48175-861 Iran
3 Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Golestan University of Medical Sciences Golestan 49186-619 Iran4Department of General Surgery School of Medicine Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran 19857-17443 Iran
Correspondence should be addressed to Zargham Sepehrizadeh zsepehritumsacir
Received 30 September 2013 Revised 12 December 2013 Accepted 16 December 2013 Published 8 January 2014
Academic Editor D Fan
Copyright copy 2014 Mohammad Soltany-Rezaee-Rad et al This is an open access article distributed under the Creative CommonsAttribution License which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work isproperly cited
To find genes involved in tumorigenesis and the development of esophageal cancer the suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH)method was used to identify genes that are overexpressed in esophageal cancer tissues compared to normal esophageal tissues Inour SSH library the forkhead boxO3 (FOXO3) glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) andmyeloid differentiationprimary response 88 (MYD88) genes were the most highly upregulated genes and they were selected for further studies becauseof their potential role in the induction of autophagy Upregulation of these genes was also observed in clinical samples using qRT-PCR In addition coexpression analysis of the autophagy-related genes Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl PIK3C3 and LC3 demonstrateda significant correlation between the differentially overexpressed genes and autophagy Autophagy is an important mechanism intumorigenesis and the development of chemoresistance in cancer cellsThe upregulation of FOXO3 GAPDH andMYD88 variantsin esophageal cancer suggests a role for autophagy and provides new insight into the biology of esophageal cancer We propose thatFOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 are novel targets for combating autophagy in esophageal cancer
1 Introduction
Esophageal cancer is one of the most aggressive and life-threatening types of carcinoma in developing countries andit has a high incidence rate in some geographical regionsparticularly in the ldquoAsian esophageal cancer beltrdquo whichextends from the Caspian Littoral in Iran TurkmenistanUzbekistan and Kazakhstan to the northern provinces ofChina [1] Esophageal cancer is among the top 10 causes ofcancer-related deaths worldwide [2] Although some alteredoncogenes and tumor suppressor genes have been identi-fied in esophageal cancer (eg p53 deletion p21 alteration
and amplification of CCND1 and c-myc) the fundamentalmolecular mechanisms leading to esophageal cancer remainunknown [3ndash6] The identification of genes that are dif-ferentially expressed in esophageal cancer cells allows forthe identification of new biomarkers and therapeutic targetgenes In addition this strategy could lead to an improvedunderstanding of the molecular biology and mechanisms ofcarcinogenesis in esophageal cancer
In contrast to apoptosis autophagy is primarily a cellsurvival process thus autophagy has been considered animportant mechanism in chemoresistance and is knownas a survival factor for tumor cells in the early stages of
Hindawi Publishing CorporationGastroenterology Research and PracticeVolume 2014 Article ID 185035 8 pageshttpdxdoiorg1011552014185035
2 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
tumorigenesis [7ndash10] In this study suppression subtrac-tive hybridization (SSH) was used to identify genes thatare overexpressed in esophageal cancer cells Among theidentified ESTs from the constructed SSH library potentialautophagy-inducing genes (FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH)were selected for further analysisThe incidence of autophagywas also determined in clinical tissue samples by quantifyingautophagy-relatedregulatory genesThis study provides newinformation concerning the genes associated with the devel-opment of esophageal cancer particularly those involved inautophagy which could have a significant influence on thediagnosis and treatment of this type of cancer which typicallyhas a poor prognosis
2 Materials and Methods
21 Tissue Collection The samples used for the SSH weresurgically resected using esophagectomy from a patient priorto chemotherapy Normal tissue was resected 10 cm far fromthe tumor A pathologist dissected the target tissues under themicroscope with special care for minimal contamination ofnonepithelial cells For confirmation of overexpressed genesby qRT-PCR 10 samples from 5 patients (5 tumors and5 normal tissues from the same patients) were collectedusing endoscopy Target tissues were immersed in 10 volumesof an RNAlater solution (Ambion Austin TX USA) Thesamples were stored at minus80∘C freezer The resected tissueswere examined using hematoxylin-eosin (HampE) stainingTheconsent form was approved by the Biologic Sampling EthicsCommittee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences andobtained from patients prior to sampling
22 Extraction of Total RNA Tissues were lysed using amortar and pestle and liquid nitrogen TwomL of Tripureisolation reagent (Roche Applied Science Indianapolis INUSA) was addedThe lysed tissues were passed through a 20-gauge needle 10 times for homogenizationTheprocedurewasperformed according to the manufacturerrsquos instructions Theconcentration and purity of the total RNA were determinedusing a BioPhotometer (Eppendorf Hamburg Germany)RNA quality was assessed using a 1 denatured agarose gel
23 Isolation of mRNA mRNA was isolated using the Dyn-aBeads mRNA Isolation Kit (Dynal Lake Success NY USA)BrieflyDynaBeads oligo (dT)
25were equilibratedwith 100120583L
of binding buffer (100mM Tris-HCl 500 nM LiCl 10mMEDTA 1 LiDS and 5mM DTT) The extracted total RNAwas diluted to 100 120583L in binding buffer and the equilibratedDynaBeads were added and incubated for 5min at 37∘Cin a shaking incubator The beads were then placed on amagnet the supernatant was removed and the beads werewashed twice using 200 120583L of washing buffer (10mM Tris-HCl 015M LiCl and 1mM of EDTA) Elution buffer (10 120583L)was added to the beads prior to incubation at 65∘C for 2minThe beads were then immediately placed on the magnet andthe eluted mRNA was isolated To improve the reduction ofbackground rRNA this protocol was repeated on the eluted
mRNA The purity of the purified mRNA was assessed usinga 1 denatured agarose gel
24 Construction of the SSH Library When constructing asubtracted library it is routine procedure to use a singlesample pair SSH library construction was achieved using thePCR-Select cDNA subtraction kit (Clontech Palo alto CAUSA) according to the manufacturerrsquos instructions Briefly2 120583g mRNA from normal (as Driver) and tumor (as Tester)tissues was applied for the first and second cDNA synthesisThe resulting cDNA was digested with RsaI and the blunt-ended double-stranded cDNAwas purifiedTheTester cDNAwas divided into two parts which were individually ligated toadaptor 1 and adaptor 2 The adaptor 1- and adaptor 2-ligatedcDNAs were separately hybridized with excess amountsof Driver cDNA for 8 hr at 68∘C The two hybridizationmixtures were combined and hybridizedwith excess amountsof Driver cDNA overnight at 68∘C The final hybridizationmixture was diluted using 200 120583L of dilution buffer for twosubsequent rounds of PCR The constructed SSH librarieswere confirmed using 1 agarose gel electrophoresis
25 Cloning and Similarity Searches The constructed SSHlibraries were purified using the PCR Product PurificationKit (Roche Applied Science) and the purified PCR productswere ligated into the pUC19 cloning vector and transformedinto Escherichia coli NovaBlue competent cells (NovagenMadison WI USA) Positive clones were verified usingthe colony PCR method with the adaptor-specific primersN1 (51015840-TCGAGCGGCCGCCCGGGCAGGT-31015840) and N2R(51015840-AGCGTGGTCGCGGCCGAGGT-31015840) and the plasmidswere isolated for sequencing using the High Pure Plas-mid Isolation Kit (Roche Applied Sciences) Single direc-tion DNA sequencing was performed using the BigDyeterminator v31 sequencing kit and a 3730xl automatedsequencer (Applied Biosystems Foster City CA USA)Similarity searches were performed using the BLASTntBLASTn and tBLASTx algorithms in the NCBI GenBankdatabases (httpblastncbinlmnihgovBlastcgi) to analyzethe sequences
26 Analysis of the Subtraction Efficiency The efficiency ofthe subtraction method was analyzed by comparing theabundance of a nondifferentially expressed housekeepinggene (eg beta actin) before and after subtraction Brieflythe subtracted and nonsubtracted samples were diluted 10-fold in H
2O as a template for PCR Real-time PCR reactions
were prepared by adding 10 120583L of SYBR Premix Ex Taq(Takara Kusatsu Japan) 1 120583L of sample 08 pmol of the betaactin primers 04120583L of ROX dye and DEPC-treated waterto a final volume of 20120583L The thermal cycling parametersfor the reaction consisted of an initial heating of 10min at95∘C followed by 40 cycles of 30 sec at 95∘C and 1min at60∘C Melting curve analysis was performed by increasingthe temperature from 65∘C to 95∘C in 01∘Csecond incre-ments for each fluorescence reading using the Step-One-Plusapparatus (Applied Biosystems) The subtraction efficiency
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 3
was determined using the relative expression of the beta actingene in the subtracted and nonsubtracted samples
27 qRT-PCR Analysis of the FOXO3 MYD88 Variants andGAPDH Genes To analyze the overexpression of the genesidentified using the SSH normal and cancerous endoscopictissue samples were collected from patients Total RNAwas extracted using the Tripure Isolation Reagent (RocheApplied Sciences) One 120583g of total RNA was used for cDNAsynthesis with the Expand Reverse Transcriptase (RocheApplied Sciences) and oligo (dT)
18primer Table 1 presents
the primers that were designed to amplify the FOXO3GAPDH and beta actin genes in the qRT-PCR reactionAlternative splicing of MYD88 variants was analyzed usingthe real-time PCR method In this method primers weredesigned based on variant-specific exons from MYD88 Thedesigned primers locations for the specific MyD88 variantsare depicted in Figure 1 The primers were designed usingPrimerSelect software version 710 (DNAstar Madison WIUSA) and synthesized by the TAG Company (TAG Copen-hagen Copenhagen Denmark) The qRT-PCR reaction wasprepared using 10120583L of SYBRPremix ExTaq (Takara) 2120583L ofcDNA 08 pmol of each forward and reverse primer 04 120583L ofROX dye and DEPC-treated water to a final volume of 20 120583LThe thermal cycling program for the reactions was as followsan initial heating for 10min at 95∘C followed by 40 cyclesof 30 sec at 95∘C and 1min at the annealing temperature ofthe selected geneThe annealing temperatures of the designedprimers are presented in Table 1 Melting curve analysiswas performed by increasing the temperature from 65∘Cto 95∘C in 01∘Csecond increments for each fluorescencereading The efficiencies of the reactions amplifying theFOXO3MYD88 variantsGAPDH andbeta actin geneswerecalculated using a standard curve that consisted of 5 pointsfrom 10-fold serial dilutions that were prepared using 100 ngof the synthesized cDNA as the first point Expression levelsof the FOXO3 MYD88 variants and GAPDH genes werenormalized using the beta actin gene The relative expressionlevel for each gene was calculated using REST 2008 softwareV207 (Corbett Research Sydney Australia)
28 Detection of Autophagy Autophagy was detected usingreal-time PCR to obtain a relative quantification of theBeclin1 PIK3C3 ATG12 LC3 and Gabarapl1 genes incancerous and normal tissues The primers were designedusing PrimerSelect software version 710 (Lasergene) andsynthesized by the TAG Company (TAG Copenhagen) Thereal-time PCR reactions were done as described aboveThe expression levels of Beclin1 PIK3C3 ATG12 LC3 andGabarapl1 were normalized using beta actin and relativeexpression was calculated using REST 2008 software V207(Corbett Research)
29 Statistical Analysis The 119905-test was used for statisticalanalysis Spearmanrsquos Rho analysis was applied to assess apossible relationship between the expression levels of theidentified differentially expressed genes (FOXO3 GAPDHand MYD88) and the autophagy-related genes in cancerous
and normal tissues The statistical significance was set at 119875 lt005
3 Results
31 Suppression Subtractive Hybridization and SubtractionEfficiency To identify genes overexpressed in esophagealcancer SSH was performed using cancerous tissue as theTester and normal tissue as theDriver Figure 2 represents theconstructed SSH library in which the subtracted genes canbe seen in the 180ndash1200 bp region Among the significantlyoverexpressed genes (unpublished data) 3 clones represent-ing the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH genes were selectedbecause of their probable role in the induction of autophagySelected clones were annotated as FOXO3 with a length of307 bp and 95 identity with FOXO3 sequences MYD88with a length of 256 bp and 99 identity with MYD88sequences and GAPDH with a length of 758 bp and 98identity with GAPDH sequences from the NCBI databaseReal-time PCR analysis demonstrated that beta actin has a97-fold reduction in the subtracted library comparedwith thenonsubtracted library
32 FOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 Are Overexpressed inEsophageal Cancer Tissues To confirm the results obtainedfrom the constructed SSH library the expression levels ofthe FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH genes were quantified incancerous and normal esophageal tissues using qRT-PCROverexpression of FOXO3 GAPDH andMYD88 variants isdepicted in Figure 3 These results confirmed the efficiencyof the SSH library which indicated that these genes weresignificantly overexpressed in esophageal cancer
33 MYD88v1 and MYD88v3 Are the Dominant Variantsin Esophageal Cancer Tissues The MYD88 variants wereamplified using the Step-One-Plus apparatus The meltingtemperatures of MYD88 v1 v2 v3 and v5 were 8799∘C859∘C 862∘C and 8471∘C respectively (Figure 4) Themean fold induction for each MYD88 variant is depictedin Figure 3 The results demonstrated a significant shift inthe pattern of expression of MYD88 variants 1 and 3 inthe esophageal cancer tissues compared with the normaltissues In normal tissues the expression patterns of theMYD88 variants were as follows MYD88v1 10 MYD88v212 MYD88v3 76 and MYD88v5 2 In contrast thefollowing expression patterns were observed in canceroustissuesMYD88v1 25MYD88v2 13MYD88v3 58 andMYD88v5 4
34 Overexpression of Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl1 LC3 andPIK3C3 Indicates Autophagy in Esophageal Cancer TissuesThe transcript level of Beclin1 a gene that is involved inautophagic vacuole formation and acts as a coregulatorof autophagy increased 3825-fold in tumor tissues Thetranscript levels of LC3ATG12 andGabarapl1 genes involvedin autophagic vacuole formation increased 304-fold 2685-fold and 1820-fold in tumor tissues respectively The tran-script level of PIK3C3 a gene that acts as a coregulator of
4 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Table1Designedprim
erssequences
used
toqu
antifygene
expressio
nby
real-timeP
CR
Application
Prim
ername
Accessionnu
mber
Leng
thSequ
ence
(51015840
to31015840)
Ann
ealin
gtemperature
Locatio
nProd
uctsize
Overexpressed
genes
FOXO
3-F
NM
0014553
20AC
GGTG
TTCG
GAC
CTTC
ATC
60∘
C1613ndash1632
196b
pFO
XO3-R
NM
0014553
20TG
CTGGCC
TGAG
ACAT
CAAG
1789ndash1808
GAPD
H-F
NM
002046
420
CGAC
AGTC
AGCC
GCA
TCTT
C61∘
C118
ndash137
250b
pGAPD
H-R
NM
002046
420
CGTT
CTCA
GCC
TTGAC
GGTG
348ndash367
MYD
88-v1-F
NM
00117
25671
20TC
ATCG
AAAAG
AGGTT
GGCT
57∘
C855ndash875
158b
pMYD
88-v1-R
NM
00117
25671
20GAT
GGGGAT
CAGTC
GCT
TCT
993ndash1012
MYD
88-v2-F
NM
0024684
20CC
ACAC
TTGAT
GAC
CCCC
TG61∘
C66
6ndash685
210b
pMYD
88-v2-R
NM
0024684
20GGCG
GCA
CCTC
TTTT
CGAT
G856ndash
875
MYD
88-v3-F
NM
00117
25681
20GGGAC
CCAG
CATT
GGGCA
TA61∘
C538ndash557
289b
pMYD
88-v3-R
NM
00117
25681
20AC
CTGGAG
AGAG
GCT
GAG
TG807ndash826
MYD
88-v4-F
NM
00117
25691
20CT
TGAT
GAC
CCCC
TGGGTG
C62∘
C671ndash690
207b
pMYD
88-v4-R
NM
00117
25691
20GGTT
GGTG
TAGTC
GCA
GAC
A858ndash877
MYD
88-v5-F
NM
00117
25661
17AC
CCAG
CATT
GGTG
CCG
60∘
C541ndash557
202b
pMYD
88-v5-R
NM
00117
2566
120
GGTT
GGTG
TAGTC
GCA
GAC
A723ndash742
Con
trolgene
ACTB
-FNM
0011013
21AT
GGCC
ACGGCT
GCT
TCCA
GC
60∘
C763ndash783
322b
pAC
TB-R
NM
0011013
21CA
GGAG
GAG
CAAT
GAT
CTTG
A1064
ndash1084
Autoph
agy-relatedgenes
Gabarapl1-F
NM
0314122
20CA
GGGTC
CCCG
TGAT
TGTA
G61∘
C321ndash340
179b
pGabarapl1-R
NM
0314122
20TG
GGAG
GGAT
GGTG
TTGTT
G480ndash
499
Beclin1-F
NM
003766
320
GCT
GAAG
ACAG
AGCG
ATGGT
595∘
C30ndash4
9169b
pBe
clin1-R
NM
003766
320
CATG
GTG
CTGTT
GTT
GGAC
G179ndash
198
PIK3
C3-F
NM
0026472
20GGCA
CACA
GAG
TGAG
CAGTA
595∘
C2423ndash244
2204b
pPIK3
C3-R
NM
0026472
20CA
CAGCC
TCTT
CATC
CGAC
A2607ndash2626
ATG12-F
NM
0047073
20TG
CTGGAG
GGGAAG
GAC
TTA
595∘
C347ndash366
186b
pAT
G12-R
NM
0047073
20GTT
CGCT
CTAC
TGCC
CACT
T513ndash532
MAP1LC
3B-F
NM
0228184
20GCC
GCC
TTTT
TGGGTA
GAAG
595∘
C1012ndash1031
225b
pMAP1LC
3B-F
NM
0228184
20TA
CCCC
TGCA
AGAG
TGAG
GA
1217ndash1236
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 204 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v1-F MYD88-v1-R
686 687 891 892 983 984 2874Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v3-F MYD88-v3-R
552 732 733 824 825 2715Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v4-F MYD88-v4-R
686 687 778 779 2669Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v5-F MYD88-v5-R
552 643 644 2534Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v2-F MYD88-v2-R
686 687 867 868 959 960 2850Exon 3a Exon 4 Exon 5
MYD88 variant 1
MYD88 variant 2
MYD88 variant 3
MYD88 variant 4
MYD88 variant 5
NM 0011725671
NM 0024684
NM 0011725681
NM 0011725691
NM 0011725661
Figure 1 Alternative splicing variants of the MYD88 gene and designed primers locations
DN
Ala
dder
Forw
ard
libra
ry
1000 bp
250bp
(a)
Nonsubtracted library Subtracted library00
02
04
06
08
10
12
Fold
chan
ge
1
0103
(b)
Figure 2 Construction of the SSH library (a) Forward constructed library (Lane 2) which ranges in length from 180 to 1200 bp (b) Evaluationof the subtraction efficiency of the constructed library The relative expression levels of the beta actin gene in the two samples indicate thatthere is a 97-fold decrease in beta actin expression in the subtracted cDNAs
autophagy and is involved in the induction of autophagy inresponse to intracellular signals was 2704-fold higher intumor tissues than in normal tissues (Figure 3) Correlationof FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes is represented in Table 2
4 Discussion
Autophagy is categorized as a protein degradation systemwhich participates in the cellular homeostasis that is typicallyobserved in nutrient-deprived cells In this process excess orunnecessary proteins and organelles are fused to lysosomesand digested by lysosomal enzymes [11 12] In the earlystages of the tumorigenesis and during cancer treatmentautophagy induction fortifies cancer cell growth in thetumor microenvironment by protecting cells from nutrient
deprivation and providing an alternative energy source forcancer cells [13 14]
In this study suppression subtractive hybridization wasused to identify the overexpressed genes FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH which have potential roles in the induction ofautophagy in esophageal cancer cells Upregulation of thesegenes was confirmed in esophageal cancer samples usingqRT-PCR
The work presented here identified the FOXO3 geneas being overexpressed in esophageal cancer This genebelongs to a family of transcription proteins that is involvedin the regulation of autophagy Autophagy-related genes(eg LC3 and BNIP3) are directly upregulated by FOXO3[15 16] In addition previous studies revealed that FOXO3overexpression induced autophagy in the HEK293T cell line[17] Our results indicated that FOXO3 was upregulated
6 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
0
5
10
15
20
SSH library overexpressed genes
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
FOXO
3
GA
PDH
MYD
88
v1
MYD
88
v2
MYD
88
v3
MYD
88
v5
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(a)
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Autophagy-related genes
Becli
n1
ATG12
Gab
arap
l1
PIK3
C3 LC3
lowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowastlowastlowast
lowastlowast
(b)
Figure 3 Relative expression of genes identified from the SSH library MYD88 isoforms- and autophagy-related genes in esophageal cancertissues assessed using real-time PCR (a) Relative expression levels of genes that are overexpressed in esophageal tumor (FOXO3 GAPDHand MYD88 variants) Expression of MYD88v4 was not detectable in samples (b) Detection of autophagy in esophageal tumors Relativeexpression of autophagy-related genes (Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl1 LC3 and PIK3C3) in esophageal tumor tissues (e) represent the meanand whiskers the SEM of expression in samples (119899 = 10) lowast
119875
lt 005 lowastlowast119875
lt 001
Table 2 Correlations of FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes
LC3 Gabarapl1 ATG12 PIK3C3 Beclin1FOXO3 0000 0007 0007 0000 0000MYD88v1 0000 0500 0007 0007 0000MYD88v2 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000MYD88v3 0000 0062 0000 0007 0000MYD88v5 0062 0062 0062 0062 0229GAPDH 0062 0500 0000 0000 0062Correlations were considered significant when 119875 lt 001
950900850800750700650
200000
150000
100000
50000
Der
ivat
ive r
epor
ter (minus
Rn998400)
Temperature (∘C)
MYD88v5Tm 8471∘C
MYD88v3Tm 8799∘C
MYD88v2
Tm 862∘C
MYD88v1
Tm 859∘C
MYD88v4Tm unknown
Figure 4 Melting curve analysis of MYD88 variants Peaks showeach variant and its melting temperature in ∘C Expression ofMYD88v4 was not detectable
5187-fold in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3 overexpres-sion in cancer cells could be related to nutrient deprivationstress and other stimulatory factors that lead to autophagyinduction Elevated expression of the transcription factorFOXO3 induces autophagy protein expression and promotesthe induction of autophagy
MYD88 is another overexpressed gene in the con-structed library MYD88 is a cytosolic adaptor protein in theinterleukin-1 (IL-1) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalingpathways which have critical roles in innate and adaptiveimmunity [18] Previous studies demonstrated that MYD88has an important function in tumorigenesis and high levelsof MYD88 correlate with poor prognosis in patients withcolorectal cancers [19] Lipopolysaccharides a TLR receptorligand upregulates 120573-1 integrin which leads to tumor cell-endothelial cell adhesion tumor cell-extracellular matrixadhesion and tumor cell invasion of the extracellular matrix[20] In addition MYD88 promotes tumor cell proliferationvia NF-120581B activation Previous studies demonstrated a directinteraction between MYD88 and Beclin1 Interaction of
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 7
MYD88 with Beclin1 reduces Beclin1 binding to Bcl-2 whichleads to autophagy induction in cancer cells [21] Our resultsrevealed for the first time that MYD88 variants are upreg-ulated in esophageal cancer tissues compared with normaltissues Our findings indicated that MYD88 overexpressioncould lead to autophagy in esophageal cancer The cause ofMYD88 overexpression in esophageal cancer tissues likelyoriginates from the extracellular tumor matrix where thepresence of mucin could trigger prolonged activation of TLRreceptors and subsequent upregulation of MYD88 Com-pared with normal esophageal tissues there was a significantreduction in MYD88v3 levels and a significant increase inMYD88v1 levels in esophageal tumor tissues Interaction ofMYD88 with Beclin1 has been previously demonstrated butno information is available concerning the participation ofindividual exons in this interaction thus the role of each ofthe MYD88 variants in the interaction with Beclin1 and thesubsequent induction of autophagy remains to be elucidated
GAPDH is a key protein in the production of energyOverexpression of GAPDH has been reported in cancersand the primary role for GAPDH was proposed to beits pivotal function in glycolysis However cooperation ofGAPDH with ATG12 could induce autophagy instead ofcaspase-independent cell death (CICD) [22] After apoptoticcytochrome c release without caspase activation whichleads to CICD GAPDH elevates ATP levels in the cells byinducing glycolysis and cooperates with ATG12 to shift thecells away from CICD and toward autophagy In our SSHlibrary GAPDH was identified as an overexpressed genewith a 4659-fold induction Nutrient deprivation hypoxiaand high levels of cell division demand additional energyresources and GAPDH overexpression could alleviate thesedemands by inducing both glycolysis and autophagy inesophageal cancer cells
Because this is the first report of the overexpression of theFOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 genes in esophageal cancercells the precise role of these genes in esophageal cancerremains to be elucidated Significant correlations betweenthe expression levels of these genes and those of autophagy-related genes point to a potential role for these genes in theinduction of autophagy Prolonged autophagy induction intumor tissues and degradation of autophagy-related proteinsvia autophagosome formation leads to the upregulation ofautophagy-related genes in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3overexpression correlated with expression of the Gabarapl1ATG12 PIK3C3 LC3 and Beclin1 genes in cancer tissues Inlight of its transcriptional activity and regulatory effects onthe process of autophagy in skeletal muscle FOXO3 couldincrease the expression level of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer tissues [15] A significant correlationwas observed between the expression of GAPDH and theautophagy-related genes ATG12 and PIK3C3 in the tissuesamples This correlation could be related to the autophagy-induction activity of GAPDH which causes a subsequentupregulation of autophagy-related genes Overexpression ofMYD88v1 MYD88v2 and MYD88v3 correlated with upreg-ulation of the autophagy-related genes Beclin1 ATG12LC3 and PIK3C3 This correlation could be related to the
induction of autophagy via TLR receptors which leads toMYD88 upregulation
The results of this study suggest that the induction ofautophagy in cancerous tissues is an important event inthe molecular biology and tumorigenesis of esophageal can-cer Tumor cells experience metabolic stress and starvationcaused by increased proliferation and cell metabolism andhypoxia caused by inadequate angiogenesis in which ATPproduction is inefficientThese environmental stresses induceautophagy in tumor cells located far from the blood vessels[23] Autophagy decreases the energy consumption of tumorcells by reducing metabolic stress and eliminating cellularorganelles that limit damage Autophagy has previously beenstudied as a target for the development of new therapiesfor esophageal cancer because inhibition of autophagy hasthe potential to sensitize tumor cells including chemore-sistant cells to therapeutic agents [24] To date autophagyhas not been considered a fundamental molecular eventin esophageal cancer and the role of autophagy in thetumorigenesis of this cancer has not been addressed There-fore future studies that focus on autophagy as a target forcancer therapeutics are necessary Because of intraepithelialneoplasia importance in tumorigenesis of esophageal canceroccurrence of autophagy and expression of FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH genes should be studied in this stage Thiscould reveal the role of the above genes in the early stage oftumorigenesis
In conclusion using the SSH method our study revealedfor the first time that the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDHgenes are overexpressed in esophageal cancer In additionthere was a significant correlation between overexpressionof these genes and upregulation of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer Considering the fundamental role ofautophagy in tumorigenesis and the high expression levels ofFOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH in esophageal cancer furtherstudies are needed to evaluate the roles of these genes andautophagy in the development of esophageal cancer In addi-tion autophagy could be responsible for the poor prognosisand chemoresistance that are observed in esophageal cancerpatients The overexpression of the FOXO3 MYD88 andGAPDHgenes could lead to the induction of autophagy genesin esophageal cancer Thus these genes are candidates fortargeting autophagy and tumorigenesis in esophageal cancer
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Grant no 24141 from ResearchCouncil of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences(TUMS)
References
[1] J Kmet and E Mahboubi ldquoEsophageal cancer in the Caspianlittoral of Iran initial studiesrdquo Science vol 175 no 4024 pp846ndash853 1972
8 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
[2] F Bray J-S Ren E Masuyer and J Ferlay ldquoGlobal estimates ofcancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008rdquoInternational Journal of Cancer vol 132 pp 1133ndash1145 2013
[3] T Anayama M Furihata T Takeuchi et al ldquoInsufficient effectof p27(KIP1) to inhibit cyclin D1 in human esophageal cancer invitrordquo International Journal of Oncology vol 18 no 1 pp 151ndash155 2001
[4] U Ribeiro S D Finkelstein A V Safatle-Ribeiro et al ldquop53sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome ofpatients with esophageal carcinomardquo Cancer vol 83 pp 7ndash181998
[5] R Ralhan S Arora T K Chattopadhyay N K Shukla and MMathur ldquoCirculating p53 antibodies p53 gene mutational pro-file and product accumulation in esophageal squamous-cell car-cinoma in Indiardquo International Journal of Cancer vol 85 pp791ndash795 2000
[6] M E Nita H Nagawa O Tominaga et al ldquop21Waf1Cip1 ex-pression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected eso-phageal squamous cell carcinoma but not p27Kip1 p53 or RbrdquoAnnals of Surgical Oncology vol 6 no 5 pp 481ndash488 1999
[7] P Maycotte and A Thorburn ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoCancer Biology andTherapy vol 11 no 2 pp 127ndash137 2011
[8] L Moretti E S Yang K W Kim and B Lu ldquoAutophagy sig-naling in cancer and its potential as novel target to improveanticancer therapyrdquoDrug ResistanceUpdates vol 10 no 4-5 pp135ndash143 2007
[9] N Chen and J Debnath ldquoAutophagy and tumorigenesisrdquo FEBSLetters vol 584 no 7 pp 1427ndash1435 2010
[10] L Yang Y Yu R Kang et al ldquoUp-regulated autophagy by en-dogenous highmobility group box-1 promotes chemoresistancein leukemia cellsrdquo Leukemia and Lymphoma vol 53 no 2 pp315ndash322 2012
[11] D J Klionsky and S D Emr ldquoAutophagy as a regulated pathwayof cellular degradationrdquo Science vol 290 no 5497 pp 1717ndash17212000
[12] D Glick S Barth and K F Macleod ldquoAutophagy cellular andmolecular mechanismsrdquo Journal of Pathology vol 221 no 1 pp3ndash12 2010
[13] Y Kondo T Kanzawa R Sawaya and S Kondo ldquoThe roleof autophagy in cancer development and response to therapyrdquoNature Reviews Cancer vol 5 no 9 pp 726ndash734 2005
[14] Y Kondo and S Kondo ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoAutophagy vol 2 no 2 pp 85ndash90 2006
[15] C Mammucari G Milan V Romanello et al ldquoFoxO3 controlsautophagy in skeletal muscle in vivordquo Cell Metabolism vol 6no 6 pp 458ndash471 2007
[16] J Zhao J J Brault A Schild et al ldquoFoxO3 coordinately activatesprotein degradation by the autophagiclysosomal and proteaso-mal pathways in atrophying muscle cellsrdquo Cell Metabolism vol6 no 6 pp 472ndash483 2007
[17] J Zhou W Liao J Yang et al ldquoFOXO3 induces FOXO1-de-pendent autophagy by activating the AKT1 signaling pathwayrdquoAutophagy vol 8 pp 1712ndash1723 2012
[18] R Medzhitov P Preston-Hurlburt E Kopp et al ldquoMyD88 isan adaptor protein in the hTollIL-1 receptor family signalingpathwaysrdquoMolecular Cell vol 2 no 2 pp 253ndash258 1998
[19] E L Wang Z R Qian M Nakasono et al ldquoHigh expressionof Toll-like receptor 4myeloid differentiation factor 88 signalscorrelates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancerrdquo BritishJournal of Cancer vol 102 no 5 pp 908ndash915 2010
[20] J H Wang B J Manning Q D Wu S Blankson D Bouchier-Hayes and H P Redmond ldquoEndotoxinlipopolysaccharideactivates NF-120581b and enhances tumor cell adhesion and inva-sion through a 1205731 integrin-dependent mechanismrdquo Journal ofImmunology vol 170 no 2 pp 795ndash804 2003
[21] C-S Shi and J H Kehrl ldquoMyD88 and Trif target Beclin 1 totrigger autophagy in macrophagesrdquo Journal of Biological Chem-istry vol 283 no 48 pp 33175ndash33182 2008
[22] A Colell J-E Ricci S Tait et al ldquoGAPDH and autophagy pre-serve survival after apoptotic cytochrome c release in theabsence of caspase activationrdquo Cell vol 129 no 5 pp 983ndash9972007
[23] S Jin and E White ldquoRole of autophagy in cancer managementof metabolic stressrdquo Autophagy vol 3 no 1 pp 28ndash31 2007
[24] T R OrsquoDonovan G C OrsquoSullivan and S L McKenna ldquoInduc-tion of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cellspromotes their survival and recovery following treatment withchemotherapeuticsrdquo Autophagy vol 7 no 5 pp 509ndash524 2011
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Parkinsonrsquos Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
2 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
tumorigenesis [7ndash10] In this study suppression subtrac-tive hybridization (SSH) was used to identify genes thatare overexpressed in esophageal cancer cells Among theidentified ESTs from the constructed SSH library potentialautophagy-inducing genes (FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH)were selected for further analysisThe incidence of autophagywas also determined in clinical tissue samples by quantifyingautophagy-relatedregulatory genesThis study provides newinformation concerning the genes associated with the devel-opment of esophageal cancer particularly those involved inautophagy which could have a significant influence on thediagnosis and treatment of this type of cancer which typicallyhas a poor prognosis
2 Materials and Methods
21 Tissue Collection The samples used for the SSH weresurgically resected using esophagectomy from a patient priorto chemotherapy Normal tissue was resected 10 cm far fromthe tumor A pathologist dissected the target tissues under themicroscope with special care for minimal contamination ofnonepithelial cells For confirmation of overexpressed genesby qRT-PCR 10 samples from 5 patients (5 tumors and5 normal tissues from the same patients) were collectedusing endoscopy Target tissues were immersed in 10 volumesof an RNAlater solution (Ambion Austin TX USA) Thesamples were stored at minus80∘C freezer The resected tissueswere examined using hematoxylin-eosin (HampE) stainingTheconsent form was approved by the Biologic Sampling EthicsCommittee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences andobtained from patients prior to sampling
22 Extraction of Total RNA Tissues were lysed using amortar and pestle and liquid nitrogen TwomL of Tripureisolation reagent (Roche Applied Science Indianapolis INUSA) was addedThe lysed tissues were passed through a 20-gauge needle 10 times for homogenizationTheprocedurewasperformed according to the manufacturerrsquos instructions Theconcentration and purity of the total RNA were determinedusing a BioPhotometer (Eppendorf Hamburg Germany)RNA quality was assessed using a 1 denatured agarose gel
23 Isolation of mRNA mRNA was isolated using the Dyn-aBeads mRNA Isolation Kit (Dynal Lake Success NY USA)BrieflyDynaBeads oligo (dT)
25were equilibratedwith 100120583L
of binding buffer (100mM Tris-HCl 500 nM LiCl 10mMEDTA 1 LiDS and 5mM DTT) The extracted total RNAwas diluted to 100 120583L in binding buffer and the equilibratedDynaBeads were added and incubated for 5min at 37∘Cin a shaking incubator The beads were then placed on amagnet the supernatant was removed and the beads werewashed twice using 200 120583L of washing buffer (10mM Tris-HCl 015M LiCl and 1mM of EDTA) Elution buffer (10 120583L)was added to the beads prior to incubation at 65∘C for 2minThe beads were then immediately placed on the magnet andthe eluted mRNA was isolated To improve the reduction ofbackground rRNA this protocol was repeated on the eluted
mRNA The purity of the purified mRNA was assessed usinga 1 denatured agarose gel
24 Construction of the SSH Library When constructing asubtracted library it is routine procedure to use a singlesample pair SSH library construction was achieved using thePCR-Select cDNA subtraction kit (Clontech Palo alto CAUSA) according to the manufacturerrsquos instructions Briefly2 120583g mRNA from normal (as Driver) and tumor (as Tester)tissues was applied for the first and second cDNA synthesisThe resulting cDNA was digested with RsaI and the blunt-ended double-stranded cDNAwas purifiedTheTester cDNAwas divided into two parts which were individually ligated toadaptor 1 and adaptor 2 The adaptor 1- and adaptor 2-ligatedcDNAs were separately hybridized with excess amountsof Driver cDNA for 8 hr at 68∘C The two hybridizationmixtures were combined and hybridizedwith excess amountsof Driver cDNA overnight at 68∘C The final hybridizationmixture was diluted using 200 120583L of dilution buffer for twosubsequent rounds of PCR The constructed SSH librarieswere confirmed using 1 agarose gel electrophoresis
25 Cloning and Similarity Searches The constructed SSHlibraries were purified using the PCR Product PurificationKit (Roche Applied Science) and the purified PCR productswere ligated into the pUC19 cloning vector and transformedinto Escherichia coli NovaBlue competent cells (NovagenMadison WI USA) Positive clones were verified usingthe colony PCR method with the adaptor-specific primersN1 (51015840-TCGAGCGGCCGCCCGGGCAGGT-31015840) and N2R(51015840-AGCGTGGTCGCGGCCGAGGT-31015840) and the plasmidswere isolated for sequencing using the High Pure Plas-mid Isolation Kit (Roche Applied Sciences) Single direc-tion DNA sequencing was performed using the BigDyeterminator v31 sequencing kit and a 3730xl automatedsequencer (Applied Biosystems Foster City CA USA)Similarity searches were performed using the BLASTntBLASTn and tBLASTx algorithms in the NCBI GenBankdatabases (httpblastncbinlmnihgovBlastcgi) to analyzethe sequences
26 Analysis of the Subtraction Efficiency The efficiency ofthe subtraction method was analyzed by comparing theabundance of a nondifferentially expressed housekeepinggene (eg beta actin) before and after subtraction Brieflythe subtracted and nonsubtracted samples were diluted 10-fold in H
2O as a template for PCR Real-time PCR reactions
were prepared by adding 10 120583L of SYBR Premix Ex Taq(Takara Kusatsu Japan) 1 120583L of sample 08 pmol of the betaactin primers 04120583L of ROX dye and DEPC-treated waterto a final volume of 20120583L The thermal cycling parametersfor the reaction consisted of an initial heating of 10min at95∘C followed by 40 cycles of 30 sec at 95∘C and 1min at60∘C Melting curve analysis was performed by increasingthe temperature from 65∘C to 95∘C in 01∘Csecond incre-ments for each fluorescence reading using the Step-One-Plusapparatus (Applied Biosystems) The subtraction efficiency
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 3
was determined using the relative expression of the beta actingene in the subtracted and nonsubtracted samples
27 qRT-PCR Analysis of the FOXO3 MYD88 Variants andGAPDH Genes To analyze the overexpression of the genesidentified using the SSH normal and cancerous endoscopictissue samples were collected from patients Total RNAwas extracted using the Tripure Isolation Reagent (RocheApplied Sciences) One 120583g of total RNA was used for cDNAsynthesis with the Expand Reverse Transcriptase (RocheApplied Sciences) and oligo (dT)
18primer Table 1 presents
the primers that were designed to amplify the FOXO3GAPDH and beta actin genes in the qRT-PCR reactionAlternative splicing of MYD88 variants was analyzed usingthe real-time PCR method In this method primers weredesigned based on variant-specific exons from MYD88 Thedesigned primers locations for the specific MyD88 variantsare depicted in Figure 1 The primers were designed usingPrimerSelect software version 710 (DNAstar Madison WIUSA) and synthesized by the TAG Company (TAG Copen-hagen Copenhagen Denmark) The qRT-PCR reaction wasprepared using 10120583L of SYBRPremix ExTaq (Takara) 2120583L ofcDNA 08 pmol of each forward and reverse primer 04 120583L ofROX dye and DEPC-treated water to a final volume of 20 120583LThe thermal cycling program for the reactions was as followsan initial heating for 10min at 95∘C followed by 40 cyclesof 30 sec at 95∘C and 1min at the annealing temperature ofthe selected geneThe annealing temperatures of the designedprimers are presented in Table 1 Melting curve analysiswas performed by increasing the temperature from 65∘Cto 95∘C in 01∘Csecond increments for each fluorescencereading The efficiencies of the reactions amplifying theFOXO3MYD88 variantsGAPDH andbeta actin geneswerecalculated using a standard curve that consisted of 5 pointsfrom 10-fold serial dilutions that were prepared using 100 ngof the synthesized cDNA as the first point Expression levelsof the FOXO3 MYD88 variants and GAPDH genes werenormalized using the beta actin gene The relative expressionlevel for each gene was calculated using REST 2008 softwareV207 (Corbett Research Sydney Australia)
28 Detection of Autophagy Autophagy was detected usingreal-time PCR to obtain a relative quantification of theBeclin1 PIK3C3 ATG12 LC3 and Gabarapl1 genes incancerous and normal tissues The primers were designedusing PrimerSelect software version 710 (Lasergene) andsynthesized by the TAG Company (TAG Copenhagen) Thereal-time PCR reactions were done as described aboveThe expression levels of Beclin1 PIK3C3 ATG12 LC3 andGabarapl1 were normalized using beta actin and relativeexpression was calculated using REST 2008 software V207(Corbett Research)
29 Statistical Analysis The 119905-test was used for statisticalanalysis Spearmanrsquos Rho analysis was applied to assess apossible relationship between the expression levels of theidentified differentially expressed genes (FOXO3 GAPDHand MYD88) and the autophagy-related genes in cancerous
and normal tissues The statistical significance was set at 119875 lt005
3 Results
31 Suppression Subtractive Hybridization and SubtractionEfficiency To identify genes overexpressed in esophagealcancer SSH was performed using cancerous tissue as theTester and normal tissue as theDriver Figure 2 represents theconstructed SSH library in which the subtracted genes canbe seen in the 180ndash1200 bp region Among the significantlyoverexpressed genes (unpublished data) 3 clones represent-ing the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH genes were selectedbecause of their probable role in the induction of autophagySelected clones were annotated as FOXO3 with a length of307 bp and 95 identity with FOXO3 sequences MYD88with a length of 256 bp and 99 identity with MYD88sequences and GAPDH with a length of 758 bp and 98identity with GAPDH sequences from the NCBI databaseReal-time PCR analysis demonstrated that beta actin has a97-fold reduction in the subtracted library comparedwith thenonsubtracted library
32 FOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 Are Overexpressed inEsophageal Cancer Tissues To confirm the results obtainedfrom the constructed SSH library the expression levels ofthe FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH genes were quantified incancerous and normal esophageal tissues using qRT-PCROverexpression of FOXO3 GAPDH andMYD88 variants isdepicted in Figure 3 These results confirmed the efficiencyof the SSH library which indicated that these genes weresignificantly overexpressed in esophageal cancer
33 MYD88v1 and MYD88v3 Are the Dominant Variantsin Esophageal Cancer Tissues The MYD88 variants wereamplified using the Step-One-Plus apparatus The meltingtemperatures of MYD88 v1 v2 v3 and v5 were 8799∘C859∘C 862∘C and 8471∘C respectively (Figure 4) Themean fold induction for each MYD88 variant is depictedin Figure 3 The results demonstrated a significant shift inthe pattern of expression of MYD88 variants 1 and 3 inthe esophageal cancer tissues compared with the normaltissues In normal tissues the expression patterns of theMYD88 variants were as follows MYD88v1 10 MYD88v212 MYD88v3 76 and MYD88v5 2 In contrast thefollowing expression patterns were observed in canceroustissuesMYD88v1 25MYD88v2 13MYD88v3 58 andMYD88v5 4
34 Overexpression of Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl1 LC3 andPIK3C3 Indicates Autophagy in Esophageal Cancer TissuesThe transcript level of Beclin1 a gene that is involved inautophagic vacuole formation and acts as a coregulatorof autophagy increased 3825-fold in tumor tissues Thetranscript levels of LC3ATG12 andGabarapl1 genes involvedin autophagic vacuole formation increased 304-fold 2685-fold and 1820-fold in tumor tissues respectively The tran-script level of PIK3C3 a gene that acts as a coregulator of
4 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Table1Designedprim
erssequences
used
toqu
antifygene
expressio
nby
real-timeP
CR
Application
Prim
ername
Accessionnu
mber
Leng
thSequ
ence
(51015840
to31015840)
Ann
ealin
gtemperature
Locatio
nProd
uctsize
Overexpressed
genes
FOXO
3-F
NM
0014553
20AC
GGTG
TTCG
GAC
CTTC
ATC
60∘
C1613ndash1632
196b
pFO
XO3-R
NM
0014553
20TG
CTGGCC
TGAG
ACAT
CAAG
1789ndash1808
GAPD
H-F
NM
002046
420
CGAC
AGTC
AGCC
GCA
TCTT
C61∘
C118
ndash137
250b
pGAPD
H-R
NM
002046
420
CGTT
CTCA
GCC
TTGAC
GGTG
348ndash367
MYD
88-v1-F
NM
00117
25671
20TC
ATCG
AAAAG
AGGTT
GGCT
57∘
C855ndash875
158b
pMYD
88-v1-R
NM
00117
25671
20GAT
GGGGAT
CAGTC
GCT
TCT
993ndash1012
MYD
88-v2-F
NM
0024684
20CC
ACAC
TTGAT
GAC
CCCC
TG61∘
C66
6ndash685
210b
pMYD
88-v2-R
NM
0024684
20GGCG
GCA
CCTC
TTTT
CGAT
G856ndash
875
MYD
88-v3-F
NM
00117
25681
20GGGAC
CCAG
CATT
GGGCA
TA61∘
C538ndash557
289b
pMYD
88-v3-R
NM
00117
25681
20AC
CTGGAG
AGAG
GCT
GAG
TG807ndash826
MYD
88-v4-F
NM
00117
25691
20CT
TGAT
GAC
CCCC
TGGGTG
C62∘
C671ndash690
207b
pMYD
88-v4-R
NM
00117
25691
20GGTT
GGTG
TAGTC
GCA
GAC
A858ndash877
MYD
88-v5-F
NM
00117
25661
17AC
CCAG
CATT
GGTG
CCG
60∘
C541ndash557
202b
pMYD
88-v5-R
NM
00117
2566
120
GGTT
GGTG
TAGTC
GCA
GAC
A723ndash742
Con
trolgene
ACTB
-FNM
0011013
21AT
GGCC
ACGGCT
GCT
TCCA
GC
60∘
C763ndash783
322b
pAC
TB-R
NM
0011013
21CA
GGAG
GAG
CAAT
GAT
CTTG
A1064
ndash1084
Autoph
agy-relatedgenes
Gabarapl1-F
NM
0314122
20CA
GGGTC
CCCG
TGAT
TGTA
G61∘
C321ndash340
179b
pGabarapl1-R
NM
0314122
20TG
GGAG
GGAT
GGTG
TTGTT
G480ndash
499
Beclin1-F
NM
003766
320
GCT
GAAG
ACAG
AGCG
ATGGT
595∘
C30ndash4
9169b
pBe
clin1-R
NM
003766
320
CATG
GTG
CTGTT
GTT
GGAC
G179ndash
198
PIK3
C3-F
NM
0026472
20GGCA
CACA
GAG
TGAG
CAGTA
595∘
C2423ndash244
2204b
pPIK3
C3-R
NM
0026472
20CA
CAGCC
TCTT
CATC
CGAC
A2607ndash2626
ATG12-F
NM
0047073
20TG
CTGGAG
GGGAAG
GAC
TTA
595∘
C347ndash366
186b
pAT
G12-R
NM
0047073
20GTT
CGCT
CTAC
TGCC
CACT
T513ndash532
MAP1LC
3B-F
NM
0228184
20GCC
GCC
TTTT
TGGGTA
GAAG
595∘
C1012ndash1031
225b
pMAP1LC
3B-F
NM
0228184
20TA
CCCC
TGCA
AGAG
TGAG
GA
1217ndash1236
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 204 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v1-F MYD88-v1-R
686 687 891 892 983 984 2874Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v3-F MYD88-v3-R
552 732 733 824 825 2715Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v4-F MYD88-v4-R
686 687 778 779 2669Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v5-F MYD88-v5-R
552 643 644 2534Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v2-F MYD88-v2-R
686 687 867 868 959 960 2850Exon 3a Exon 4 Exon 5
MYD88 variant 1
MYD88 variant 2
MYD88 variant 3
MYD88 variant 4
MYD88 variant 5
NM 0011725671
NM 0024684
NM 0011725681
NM 0011725691
NM 0011725661
Figure 1 Alternative splicing variants of the MYD88 gene and designed primers locations
DN
Ala
dder
Forw
ard
libra
ry
1000 bp
250bp
(a)
Nonsubtracted library Subtracted library00
02
04
06
08
10
12
Fold
chan
ge
1
0103
(b)
Figure 2 Construction of the SSH library (a) Forward constructed library (Lane 2) which ranges in length from 180 to 1200 bp (b) Evaluationof the subtraction efficiency of the constructed library The relative expression levels of the beta actin gene in the two samples indicate thatthere is a 97-fold decrease in beta actin expression in the subtracted cDNAs
autophagy and is involved in the induction of autophagy inresponse to intracellular signals was 2704-fold higher intumor tissues than in normal tissues (Figure 3) Correlationof FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes is represented in Table 2
4 Discussion
Autophagy is categorized as a protein degradation systemwhich participates in the cellular homeostasis that is typicallyobserved in nutrient-deprived cells In this process excess orunnecessary proteins and organelles are fused to lysosomesand digested by lysosomal enzymes [11 12] In the earlystages of the tumorigenesis and during cancer treatmentautophagy induction fortifies cancer cell growth in thetumor microenvironment by protecting cells from nutrient
deprivation and providing an alternative energy source forcancer cells [13 14]
In this study suppression subtractive hybridization wasused to identify the overexpressed genes FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH which have potential roles in the induction ofautophagy in esophageal cancer cells Upregulation of thesegenes was confirmed in esophageal cancer samples usingqRT-PCR
The work presented here identified the FOXO3 geneas being overexpressed in esophageal cancer This genebelongs to a family of transcription proteins that is involvedin the regulation of autophagy Autophagy-related genes(eg LC3 and BNIP3) are directly upregulated by FOXO3[15 16] In addition previous studies revealed that FOXO3overexpression induced autophagy in the HEK293T cell line[17] Our results indicated that FOXO3 was upregulated
6 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
0
5
10
15
20
SSH library overexpressed genes
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
FOXO
3
GA
PDH
MYD
88
v1
MYD
88
v2
MYD
88
v3
MYD
88
v5
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(a)
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Autophagy-related genes
Becli
n1
ATG12
Gab
arap
l1
PIK3
C3 LC3
lowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowastlowastlowast
lowastlowast
(b)
Figure 3 Relative expression of genes identified from the SSH library MYD88 isoforms- and autophagy-related genes in esophageal cancertissues assessed using real-time PCR (a) Relative expression levels of genes that are overexpressed in esophageal tumor (FOXO3 GAPDHand MYD88 variants) Expression of MYD88v4 was not detectable in samples (b) Detection of autophagy in esophageal tumors Relativeexpression of autophagy-related genes (Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl1 LC3 and PIK3C3) in esophageal tumor tissues (e) represent the meanand whiskers the SEM of expression in samples (119899 = 10) lowast
119875
lt 005 lowastlowast119875
lt 001
Table 2 Correlations of FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes
LC3 Gabarapl1 ATG12 PIK3C3 Beclin1FOXO3 0000 0007 0007 0000 0000MYD88v1 0000 0500 0007 0007 0000MYD88v2 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000MYD88v3 0000 0062 0000 0007 0000MYD88v5 0062 0062 0062 0062 0229GAPDH 0062 0500 0000 0000 0062Correlations were considered significant when 119875 lt 001
950900850800750700650
200000
150000
100000
50000
Der
ivat
ive r
epor
ter (minus
Rn998400)
Temperature (∘C)
MYD88v5Tm 8471∘C
MYD88v3Tm 8799∘C
MYD88v2
Tm 862∘C
MYD88v1
Tm 859∘C
MYD88v4Tm unknown
Figure 4 Melting curve analysis of MYD88 variants Peaks showeach variant and its melting temperature in ∘C Expression ofMYD88v4 was not detectable
5187-fold in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3 overexpres-sion in cancer cells could be related to nutrient deprivationstress and other stimulatory factors that lead to autophagyinduction Elevated expression of the transcription factorFOXO3 induces autophagy protein expression and promotesthe induction of autophagy
MYD88 is another overexpressed gene in the con-structed library MYD88 is a cytosolic adaptor protein in theinterleukin-1 (IL-1) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalingpathways which have critical roles in innate and adaptiveimmunity [18] Previous studies demonstrated that MYD88has an important function in tumorigenesis and high levelsof MYD88 correlate with poor prognosis in patients withcolorectal cancers [19] Lipopolysaccharides a TLR receptorligand upregulates 120573-1 integrin which leads to tumor cell-endothelial cell adhesion tumor cell-extracellular matrixadhesion and tumor cell invasion of the extracellular matrix[20] In addition MYD88 promotes tumor cell proliferationvia NF-120581B activation Previous studies demonstrated a directinteraction between MYD88 and Beclin1 Interaction of
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 7
MYD88 with Beclin1 reduces Beclin1 binding to Bcl-2 whichleads to autophagy induction in cancer cells [21] Our resultsrevealed for the first time that MYD88 variants are upreg-ulated in esophageal cancer tissues compared with normaltissues Our findings indicated that MYD88 overexpressioncould lead to autophagy in esophageal cancer The cause ofMYD88 overexpression in esophageal cancer tissues likelyoriginates from the extracellular tumor matrix where thepresence of mucin could trigger prolonged activation of TLRreceptors and subsequent upregulation of MYD88 Com-pared with normal esophageal tissues there was a significantreduction in MYD88v3 levels and a significant increase inMYD88v1 levels in esophageal tumor tissues Interaction ofMYD88 with Beclin1 has been previously demonstrated butno information is available concerning the participation ofindividual exons in this interaction thus the role of each ofthe MYD88 variants in the interaction with Beclin1 and thesubsequent induction of autophagy remains to be elucidated
GAPDH is a key protein in the production of energyOverexpression of GAPDH has been reported in cancersand the primary role for GAPDH was proposed to beits pivotal function in glycolysis However cooperation ofGAPDH with ATG12 could induce autophagy instead ofcaspase-independent cell death (CICD) [22] After apoptoticcytochrome c release without caspase activation whichleads to CICD GAPDH elevates ATP levels in the cells byinducing glycolysis and cooperates with ATG12 to shift thecells away from CICD and toward autophagy In our SSHlibrary GAPDH was identified as an overexpressed genewith a 4659-fold induction Nutrient deprivation hypoxiaand high levels of cell division demand additional energyresources and GAPDH overexpression could alleviate thesedemands by inducing both glycolysis and autophagy inesophageal cancer cells
Because this is the first report of the overexpression of theFOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 genes in esophageal cancercells the precise role of these genes in esophageal cancerremains to be elucidated Significant correlations betweenthe expression levels of these genes and those of autophagy-related genes point to a potential role for these genes in theinduction of autophagy Prolonged autophagy induction intumor tissues and degradation of autophagy-related proteinsvia autophagosome formation leads to the upregulation ofautophagy-related genes in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3overexpression correlated with expression of the Gabarapl1ATG12 PIK3C3 LC3 and Beclin1 genes in cancer tissues Inlight of its transcriptional activity and regulatory effects onthe process of autophagy in skeletal muscle FOXO3 couldincrease the expression level of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer tissues [15] A significant correlationwas observed between the expression of GAPDH and theautophagy-related genes ATG12 and PIK3C3 in the tissuesamples This correlation could be related to the autophagy-induction activity of GAPDH which causes a subsequentupregulation of autophagy-related genes Overexpression ofMYD88v1 MYD88v2 and MYD88v3 correlated with upreg-ulation of the autophagy-related genes Beclin1 ATG12LC3 and PIK3C3 This correlation could be related to the
induction of autophagy via TLR receptors which leads toMYD88 upregulation
The results of this study suggest that the induction ofautophagy in cancerous tissues is an important event inthe molecular biology and tumorigenesis of esophageal can-cer Tumor cells experience metabolic stress and starvationcaused by increased proliferation and cell metabolism andhypoxia caused by inadequate angiogenesis in which ATPproduction is inefficientThese environmental stresses induceautophagy in tumor cells located far from the blood vessels[23] Autophagy decreases the energy consumption of tumorcells by reducing metabolic stress and eliminating cellularorganelles that limit damage Autophagy has previously beenstudied as a target for the development of new therapiesfor esophageal cancer because inhibition of autophagy hasthe potential to sensitize tumor cells including chemore-sistant cells to therapeutic agents [24] To date autophagyhas not been considered a fundamental molecular eventin esophageal cancer and the role of autophagy in thetumorigenesis of this cancer has not been addressed There-fore future studies that focus on autophagy as a target forcancer therapeutics are necessary Because of intraepithelialneoplasia importance in tumorigenesis of esophageal canceroccurrence of autophagy and expression of FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH genes should be studied in this stage Thiscould reveal the role of the above genes in the early stage oftumorigenesis
In conclusion using the SSH method our study revealedfor the first time that the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDHgenes are overexpressed in esophageal cancer In additionthere was a significant correlation between overexpressionof these genes and upregulation of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer Considering the fundamental role ofautophagy in tumorigenesis and the high expression levels ofFOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH in esophageal cancer furtherstudies are needed to evaluate the roles of these genes andautophagy in the development of esophageal cancer In addi-tion autophagy could be responsible for the poor prognosisand chemoresistance that are observed in esophageal cancerpatients The overexpression of the FOXO3 MYD88 andGAPDHgenes could lead to the induction of autophagy genesin esophageal cancer Thus these genes are candidates fortargeting autophagy and tumorigenesis in esophageal cancer
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Grant no 24141 from ResearchCouncil of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences(TUMS)
References
[1] J Kmet and E Mahboubi ldquoEsophageal cancer in the Caspianlittoral of Iran initial studiesrdquo Science vol 175 no 4024 pp846ndash853 1972
8 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
[2] F Bray J-S Ren E Masuyer and J Ferlay ldquoGlobal estimates ofcancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008rdquoInternational Journal of Cancer vol 132 pp 1133ndash1145 2013
[3] T Anayama M Furihata T Takeuchi et al ldquoInsufficient effectof p27(KIP1) to inhibit cyclin D1 in human esophageal cancer invitrordquo International Journal of Oncology vol 18 no 1 pp 151ndash155 2001
[4] U Ribeiro S D Finkelstein A V Safatle-Ribeiro et al ldquop53sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome ofpatients with esophageal carcinomardquo Cancer vol 83 pp 7ndash181998
[5] R Ralhan S Arora T K Chattopadhyay N K Shukla and MMathur ldquoCirculating p53 antibodies p53 gene mutational pro-file and product accumulation in esophageal squamous-cell car-cinoma in Indiardquo International Journal of Cancer vol 85 pp791ndash795 2000
[6] M E Nita H Nagawa O Tominaga et al ldquop21Waf1Cip1 ex-pression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected eso-phageal squamous cell carcinoma but not p27Kip1 p53 or RbrdquoAnnals of Surgical Oncology vol 6 no 5 pp 481ndash488 1999
[7] P Maycotte and A Thorburn ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoCancer Biology andTherapy vol 11 no 2 pp 127ndash137 2011
[8] L Moretti E S Yang K W Kim and B Lu ldquoAutophagy sig-naling in cancer and its potential as novel target to improveanticancer therapyrdquoDrug ResistanceUpdates vol 10 no 4-5 pp135ndash143 2007
[9] N Chen and J Debnath ldquoAutophagy and tumorigenesisrdquo FEBSLetters vol 584 no 7 pp 1427ndash1435 2010
[10] L Yang Y Yu R Kang et al ldquoUp-regulated autophagy by en-dogenous highmobility group box-1 promotes chemoresistancein leukemia cellsrdquo Leukemia and Lymphoma vol 53 no 2 pp315ndash322 2012
[11] D J Klionsky and S D Emr ldquoAutophagy as a regulated pathwayof cellular degradationrdquo Science vol 290 no 5497 pp 1717ndash17212000
[12] D Glick S Barth and K F Macleod ldquoAutophagy cellular andmolecular mechanismsrdquo Journal of Pathology vol 221 no 1 pp3ndash12 2010
[13] Y Kondo T Kanzawa R Sawaya and S Kondo ldquoThe roleof autophagy in cancer development and response to therapyrdquoNature Reviews Cancer vol 5 no 9 pp 726ndash734 2005
[14] Y Kondo and S Kondo ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoAutophagy vol 2 no 2 pp 85ndash90 2006
[15] C Mammucari G Milan V Romanello et al ldquoFoxO3 controlsautophagy in skeletal muscle in vivordquo Cell Metabolism vol 6no 6 pp 458ndash471 2007
[16] J Zhao J J Brault A Schild et al ldquoFoxO3 coordinately activatesprotein degradation by the autophagiclysosomal and proteaso-mal pathways in atrophying muscle cellsrdquo Cell Metabolism vol6 no 6 pp 472ndash483 2007
[17] J Zhou W Liao J Yang et al ldquoFOXO3 induces FOXO1-de-pendent autophagy by activating the AKT1 signaling pathwayrdquoAutophagy vol 8 pp 1712ndash1723 2012
[18] R Medzhitov P Preston-Hurlburt E Kopp et al ldquoMyD88 isan adaptor protein in the hTollIL-1 receptor family signalingpathwaysrdquoMolecular Cell vol 2 no 2 pp 253ndash258 1998
[19] E L Wang Z R Qian M Nakasono et al ldquoHigh expressionof Toll-like receptor 4myeloid differentiation factor 88 signalscorrelates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancerrdquo BritishJournal of Cancer vol 102 no 5 pp 908ndash915 2010
[20] J H Wang B J Manning Q D Wu S Blankson D Bouchier-Hayes and H P Redmond ldquoEndotoxinlipopolysaccharideactivates NF-120581b and enhances tumor cell adhesion and inva-sion through a 1205731 integrin-dependent mechanismrdquo Journal ofImmunology vol 170 no 2 pp 795ndash804 2003
[21] C-S Shi and J H Kehrl ldquoMyD88 and Trif target Beclin 1 totrigger autophagy in macrophagesrdquo Journal of Biological Chem-istry vol 283 no 48 pp 33175ndash33182 2008
[22] A Colell J-E Ricci S Tait et al ldquoGAPDH and autophagy pre-serve survival after apoptotic cytochrome c release in theabsence of caspase activationrdquo Cell vol 129 no 5 pp 983ndash9972007
[23] S Jin and E White ldquoRole of autophagy in cancer managementof metabolic stressrdquo Autophagy vol 3 no 1 pp 28ndash31 2007
[24] T R OrsquoDonovan G C OrsquoSullivan and S L McKenna ldquoInduc-tion of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cellspromotes their survival and recovery following treatment withchemotherapeuticsrdquo Autophagy vol 7 no 5 pp 509ndash524 2011
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Parkinsonrsquos Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 3
was determined using the relative expression of the beta actingene in the subtracted and nonsubtracted samples
27 qRT-PCR Analysis of the FOXO3 MYD88 Variants andGAPDH Genes To analyze the overexpression of the genesidentified using the SSH normal and cancerous endoscopictissue samples were collected from patients Total RNAwas extracted using the Tripure Isolation Reagent (RocheApplied Sciences) One 120583g of total RNA was used for cDNAsynthesis with the Expand Reverse Transcriptase (RocheApplied Sciences) and oligo (dT)
18primer Table 1 presents
the primers that were designed to amplify the FOXO3GAPDH and beta actin genes in the qRT-PCR reactionAlternative splicing of MYD88 variants was analyzed usingthe real-time PCR method In this method primers weredesigned based on variant-specific exons from MYD88 Thedesigned primers locations for the specific MyD88 variantsare depicted in Figure 1 The primers were designed usingPrimerSelect software version 710 (DNAstar Madison WIUSA) and synthesized by the TAG Company (TAG Copen-hagen Copenhagen Denmark) The qRT-PCR reaction wasprepared using 10120583L of SYBRPremix ExTaq (Takara) 2120583L ofcDNA 08 pmol of each forward and reverse primer 04 120583L ofROX dye and DEPC-treated water to a final volume of 20 120583LThe thermal cycling program for the reactions was as followsan initial heating for 10min at 95∘C followed by 40 cyclesof 30 sec at 95∘C and 1min at the annealing temperature ofthe selected geneThe annealing temperatures of the designedprimers are presented in Table 1 Melting curve analysiswas performed by increasing the temperature from 65∘Cto 95∘C in 01∘Csecond increments for each fluorescencereading The efficiencies of the reactions amplifying theFOXO3MYD88 variantsGAPDH andbeta actin geneswerecalculated using a standard curve that consisted of 5 pointsfrom 10-fold serial dilutions that were prepared using 100 ngof the synthesized cDNA as the first point Expression levelsof the FOXO3 MYD88 variants and GAPDH genes werenormalized using the beta actin gene The relative expressionlevel for each gene was calculated using REST 2008 softwareV207 (Corbett Research Sydney Australia)
28 Detection of Autophagy Autophagy was detected usingreal-time PCR to obtain a relative quantification of theBeclin1 PIK3C3 ATG12 LC3 and Gabarapl1 genes incancerous and normal tissues The primers were designedusing PrimerSelect software version 710 (Lasergene) andsynthesized by the TAG Company (TAG Copenhagen) Thereal-time PCR reactions were done as described aboveThe expression levels of Beclin1 PIK3C3 ATG12 LC3 andGabarapl1 were normalized using beta actin and relativeexpression was calculated using REST 2008 software V207(Corbett Research)
29 Statistical Analysis The 119905-test was used for statisticalanalysis Spearmanrsquos Rho analysis was applied to assess apossible relationship between the expression levels of theidentified differentially expressed genes (FOXO3 GAPDHand MYD88) and the autophagy-related genes in cancerous
and normal tissues The statistical significance was set at 119875 lt005
3 Results
31 Suppression Subtractive Hybridization and SubtractionEfficiency To identify genes overexpressed in esophagealcancer SSH was performed using cancerous tissue as theTester and normal tissue as theDriver Figure 2 represents theconstructed SSH library in which the subtracted genes canbe seen in the 180ndash1200 bp region Among the significantlyoverexpressed genes (unpublished data) 3 clones represent-ing the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH genes were selectedbecause of their probable role in the induction of autophagySelected clones were annotated as FOXO3 with a length of307 bp and 95 identity with FOXO3 sequences MYD88with a length of 256 bp and 99 identity with MYD88sequences and GAPDH with a length of 758 bp and 98identity with GAPDH sequences from the NCBI databaseReal-time PCR analysis demonstrated that beta actin has a97-fold reduction in the subtracted library comparedwith thenonsubtracted library
32 FOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 Are Overexpressed inEsophageal Cancer Tissues To confirm the results obtainedfrom the constructed SSH library the expression levels ofthe FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH genes were quantified incancerous and normal esophageal tissues using qRT-PCROverexpression of FOXO3 GAPDH andMYD88 variants isdepicted in Figure 3 These results confirmed the efficiencyof the SSH library which indicated that these genes weresignificantly overexpressed in esophageal cancer
33 MYD88v1 and MYD88v3 Are the Dominant Variantsin Esophageal Cancer Tissues The MYD88 variants wereamplified using the Step-One-Plus apparatus The meltingtemperatures of MYD88 v1 v2 v3 and v5 were 8799∘C859∘C 862∘C and 8471∘C respectively (Figure 4) Themean fold induction for each MYD88 variant is depictedin Figure 3 The results demonstrated a significant shift inthe pattern of expression of MYD88 variants 1 and 3 inthe esophageal cancer tissues compared with the normaltissues In normal tissues the expression patterns of theMYD88 variants were as follows MYD88v1 10 MYD88v212 MYD88v3 76 and MYD88v5 2 In contrast thefollowing expression patterns were observed in canceroustissuesMYD88v1 25MYD88v2 13MYD88v3 58 andMYD88v5 4
34 Overexpression of Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl1 LC3 andPIK3C3 Indicates Autophagy in Esophageal Cancer TissuesThe transcript level of Beclin1 a gene that is involved inautophagic vacuole formation and acts as a coregulatorof autophagy increased 3825-fold in tumor tissues Thetranscript levels of LC3ATG12 andGabarapl1 genes involvedin autophagic vacuole formation increased 304-fold 2685-fold and 1820-fold in tumor tissues respectively The tran-script level of PIK3C3 a gene that acts as a coregulator of
4 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Table1Designedprim
erssequences
used
toqu
antifygene
expressio
nby
real-timeP
CR
Application
Prim
ername
Accessionnu
mber
Leng
thSequ
ence
(51015840
to31015840)
Ann
ealin
gtemperature
Locatio
nProd
uctsize
Overexpressed
genes
FOXO
3-F
NM
0014553
20AC
GGTG
TTCG
GAC
CTTC
ATC
60∘
C1613ndash1632
196b
pFO
XO3-R
NM
0014553
20TG
CTGGCC
TGAG
ACAT
CAAG
1789ndash1808
GAPD
H-F
NM
002046
420
CGAC
AGTC
AGCC
GCA
TCTT
C61∘
C118
ndash137
250b
pGAPD
H-R
NM
002046
420
CGTT
CTCA
GCC
TTGAC
GGTG
348ndash367
MYD
88-v1-F
NM
00117
25671
20TC
ATCG
AAAAG
AGGTT
GGCT
57∘
C855ndash875
158b
pMYD
88-v1-R
NM
00117
25671
20GAT
GGGGAT
CAGTC
GCT
TCT
993ndash1012
MYD
88-v2-F
NM
0024684
20CC
ACAC
TTGAT
GAC
CCCC
TG61∘
C66
6ndash685
210b
pMYD
88-v2-R
NM
0024684
20GGCG
GCA
CCTC
TTTT
CGAT
G856ndash
875
MYD
88-v3-F
NM
00117
25681
20GGGAC
CCAG
CATT
GGGCA
TA61∘
C538ndash557
289b
pMYD
88-v3-R
NM
00117
25681
20AC
CTGGAG
AGAG
GCT
GAG
TG807ndash826
MYD
88-v4-F
NM
00117
25691
20CT
TGAT
GAC
CCCC
TGGGTG
C62∘
C671ndash690
207b
pMYD
88-v4-R
NM
00117
25691
20GGTT
GGTG
TAGTC
GCA
GAC
A858ndash877
MYD
88-v5-F
NM
00117
25661
17AC
CCAG
CATT
GGTG
CCG
60∘
C541ndash557
202b
pMYD
88-v5-R
NM
00117
2566
120
GGTT
GGTG
TAGTC
GCA
GAC
A723ndash742
Con
trolgene
ACTB
-FNM
0011013
21AT
GGCC
ACGGCT
GCT
TCCA
GC
60∘
C763ndash783
322b
pAC
TB-R
NM
0011013
21CA
GGAG
GAG
CAAT
GAT
CTTG
A1064
ndash1084
Autoph
agy-relatedgenes
Gabarapl1-F
NM
0314122
20CA
GGGTC
CCCG
TGAT
TGTA
G61∘
C321ndash340
179b
pGabarapl1-R
NM
0314122
20TG
GGAG
GGAT
GGTG
TTGTT
G480ndash
499
Beclin1-F
NM
003766
320
GCT
GAAG
ACAG
AGCG
ATGGT
595∘
C30ndash4
9169b
pBe
clin1-R
NM
003766
320
CATG
GTG
CTGTT
GTT
GGAC
G179ndash
198
PIK3
C3-F
NM
0026472
20GGCA
CACA
GAG
TGAG
CAGTA
595∘
C2423ndash244
2204b
pPIK3
C3-R
NM
0026472
20CA
CAGCC
TCTT
CATC
CGAC
A2607ndash2626
ATG12-F
NM
0047073
20TG
CTGGAG
GGGAAG
GAC
TTA
595∘
C347ndash366
186b
pAT
G12-R
NM
0047073
20GTT
CGCT
CTAC
TGCC
CACT
T513ndash532
MAP1LC
3B-F
NM
0228184
20GCC
GCC
TTTT
TGGGTA
GAAG
595∘
C1012ndash1031
225b
pMAP1LC
3B-F
NM
0228184
20TA
CCCC
TGCA
AGAG
TGAG
GA
1217ndash1236
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 204 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v1-F MYD88-v1-R
686 687 891 892 983 984 2874Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v3-F MYD88-v3-R
552 732 733 824 825 2715Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v4-F MYD88-v4-R
686 687 778 779 2669Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v5-F MYD88-v5-R
552 643 644 2534Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v2-F MYD88-v2-R
686 687 867 868 959 960 2850Exon 3a Exon 4 Exon 5
MYD88 variant 1
MYD88 variant 2
MYD88 variant 3
MYD88 variant 4
MYD88 variant 5
NM 0011725671
NM 0024684
NM 0011725681
NM 0011725691
NM 0011725661
Figure 1 Alternative splicing variants of the MYD88 gene and designed primers locations
DN
Ala
dder
Forw
ard
libra
ry
1000 bp
250bp
(a)
Nonsubtracted library Subtracted library00
02
04
06
08
10
12
Fold
chan
ge
1
0103
(b)
Figure 2 Construction of the SSH library (a) Forward constructed library (Lane 2) which ranges in length from 180 to 1200 bp (b) Evaluationof the subtraction efficiency of the constructed library The relative expression levels of the beta actin gene in the two samples indicate thatthere is a 97-fold decrease in beta actin expression in the subtracted cDNAs
autophagy and is involved in the induction of autophagy inresponse to intracellular signals was 2704-fold higher intumor tissues than in normal tissues (Figure 3) Correlationof FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes is represented in Table 2
4 Discussion
Autophagy is categorized as a protein degradation systemwhich participates in the cellular homeostasis that is typicallyobserved in nutrient-deprived cells In this process excess orunnecessary proteins and organelles are fused to lysosomesand digested by lysosomal enzymes [11 12] In the earlystages of the tumorigenesis and during cancer treatmentautophagy induction fortifies cancer cell growth in thetumor microenvironment by protecting cells from nutrient
deprivation and providing an alternative energy source forcancer cells [13 14]
In this study suppression subtractive hybridization wasused to identify the overexpressed genes FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH which have potential roles in the induction ofautophagy in esophageal cancer cells Upregulation of thesegenes was confirmed in esophageal cancer samples usingqRT-PCR
The work presented here identified the FOXO3 geneas being overexpressed in esophageal cancer This genebelongs to a family of transcription proteins that is involvedin the regulation of autophagy Autophagy-related genes(eg LC3 and BNIP3) are directly upregulated by FOXO3[15 16] In addition previous studies revealed that FOXO3overexpression induced autophagy in the HEK293T cell line[17] Our results indicated that FOXO3 was upregulated
6 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
0
5
10
15
20
SSH library overexpressed genes
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
FOXO
3
GA
PDH
MYD
88
v1
MYD
88
v2
MYD
88
v3
MYD
88
v5
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(a)
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Autophagy-related genes
Becli
n1
ATG12
Gab
arap
l1
PIK3
C3 LC3
lowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowastlowastlowast
lowastlowast
(b)
Figure 3 Relative expression of genes identified from the SSH library MYD88 isoforms- and autophagy-related genes in esophageal cancertissues assessed using real-time PCR (a) Relative expression levels of genes that are overexpressed in esophageal tumor (FOXO3 GAPDHand MYD88 variants) Expression of MYD88v4 was not detectable in samples (b) Detection of autophagy in esophageal tumors Relativeexpression of autophagy-related genes (Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl1 LC3 and PIK3C3) in esophageal tumor tissues (e) represent the meanand whiskers the SEM of expression in samples (119899 = 10) lowast
119875
lt 005 lowastlowast119875
lt 001
Table 2 Correlations of FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes
LC3 Gabarapl1 ATG12 PIK3C3 Beclin1FOXO3 0000 0007 0007 0000 0000MYD88v1 0000 0500 0007 0007 0000MYD88v2 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000MYD88v3 0000 0062 0000 0007 0000MYD88v5 0062 0062 0062 0062 0229GAPDH 0062 0500 0000 0000 0062Correlations were considered significant when 119875 lt 001
950900850800750700650
200000
150000
100000
50000
Der
ivat
ive r
epor
ter (minus
Rn998400)
Temperature (∘C)
MYD88v5Tm 8471∘C
MYD88v3Tm 8799∘C
MYD88v2
Tm 862∘C
MYD88v1
Tm 859∘C
MYD88v4Tm unknown
Figure 4 Melting curve analysis of MYD88 variants Peaks showeach variant and its melting temperature in ∘C Expression ofMYD88v4 was not detectable
5187-fold in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3 overexpres-sion in cancer cells could be related to nutrient deprivationstress and other stimulatory factors that lead to autophagyinduction Elevated expression of the transcription factorFOXO3 induces autophagy protein expression and promotesthe induction of autophagy
MYD88 is another overexpressed gene in the con-structed library MYD88 is a cytosolic adaptor protein in theinterleukin-1 (IL-1) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalingpathways which have critical roles in innate and adaptiveimmunity [18] Previous studies demonstrated that MYD88has an important function in tumorigenesis and high levelsof MYD88 correlate with poor prognosis in patients withcolorectal cancers [19] Lipopolysaccharides a TLR receptorligand upregulates 120573-1 integrin which leads to tumor cell-endothelial cell adhesion tumor cell-extracellular matrixadhesion and tumor cell invasion of the extracellular matrix[20] In addition MYD88 promotes tumor cell proliferationvia NF-120581B activation Previous studies demonstrated a directinteraction between MYD88 and Beclin1 Interaction of
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 7
MYD88 with Beclin1 reduces Beclin1 binding to Bcl-2 whichleads to autophagy induction in cancer cells [21] Our resultsrevealed for the first time that MYD88 variants are upreg-ulated in esophageal cancer tissues compared with normaltissues Our findings indicated that MYD88 overexpressioncould lead to autophagy in esophageal cancer The cause ofMYD88 overexpression in esophageal cancer tissues likelyoriginates from the extracellular tumor matrix where thepresence of mucin could trigger prolonged activation of TLRreceptors and subsequent upregulation of MYD88 Com-pared with normal esophageal tissues there was a significantreduction in MYD88v3 levels and a significant increase inMYD88v1 levels in esophageal tumor tissues Interaction ofMYD88 with Beclin1 has been previously demonstrated butno information is available concerning the participation ofindividual exons in this interaction thus the role of each ofthe MYD88 variants in the interaction with Beclin1 and thesubsequent induction of autophagy remains to be elucidated
GAPDH is a key protein in the production of energyOverexpression of GAPDH has been reported in cancersand the primary role for GAPDH was proposed to beits pivotal function in glycolysis However cooperation ofGAPDH with ATG12 could induce autophagy instead ofcaspase-independent cell death (CICD) [22] After apoptoticcytochrome c release without caspase activation whichleads to CICD GAPDH elevates ATP levels in the cells byinducing glycolysis and cooperates with ATG12 to shift thecells away from CICD and toward autophagy In our SSHlibrary GAPDH was identified as an overexpressed genewith a 4659-fold induction Nutrient deprivation hypoxiaand high levels of cell division demand additional energyresources and GAPDH overexpression could alleviate thesedemands by inducing both glycolysis and autophagy inesophageal cancer cells
Because this is the first report of the overexpression of theFOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 genes in esophageal cancercells the precise role of these genes in esophageal cancerremains to be elucidated Significant correlations betweenthe expression levels of these genes and those of autophagy-related genes point to a potential role for these genes in theinduction of autophagy Prolonged autophagy induction intumor tissues and degradation of autophagy-related proteinsvia autophagosome formation leads to the upregulation ofautophagy-related genes in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3overexpression correlated with expression of the Gabarapl1ATG12 PIK3C3 LC3 and Beclin1 genes in cancer tissues Inlight of its transcriptional activity and regulatory effects onthe process of autophagy in skeletal muscle FOXO3 couldincrease the expression level of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer tissues [15] A significant correlationwas observed between the expression of GAPDH and theautophagy-related genes ATG12 and PIK3C3 in the tissuesamples This correlation could be related to the autophagy-induction activity of GAPDH which causes a subsequentupregulation of autophagy-related genes Overexpression ofMYD88v1 MYD88v2 and MYD88v3 correlated with upreg-ulation of the autophagy-related genes Beclin1 ATG12LC3 and PIK3C3 This correlation could be related to the
induction of autophagy via TLR receptors which leads toMYD88 upregulation
The results of this study suggest that the induction ofautophagy in cancerous tissues is an important event inthe molecular biology and tumorigenesis of esophageal can-cer Tumor cells experience metabolic stress and starvationcaused by increased proliferation and cell metabolism andhypoxia caused by inadequate angiogenesis in which ATPproduction is inefficientThese environmental stresses induceautophagy in tumor cells located far from the blood vessels[23] Autophagy decreases the energy consumption of tumorcells by reducing metabolic stress and eliminating cellularorganelles that limit damage Autophagy has previously beenstudied as a target for the development of new therapiesfor esophageal cancer because inhibition of autophagy hasthe potential to sensitize tumor cells including chemore-sistant cells to therapeutic agents [24] To date autophagyhas not been considered a fundamental molecular eventin esophageal cancer and the role of autophagy in thetumorigenesis of this cancer has not been addressed There-fore future studies that focus on autophagy as a target forcancer therapeutics are necessary Because of intraepithelialneoplasia importance in tumorigenesis of esophageal canceroccurrence of autophagy and expression of FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH genes should be studied in this stage Thiscould reveal the role of the above genes in the early stage oftumorigenesis
In conclusion using the SSH method our study revealedfor the first time that the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDHgenes are overexpressed in esophageal cancer In additionthere was a significant correlation between overexpressionof these genes and upregulation of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer Considering the fundamental role ofautophagy in tumorigenesis and the high expression levels ofFOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH in esophageal cancer furtherstudies are needed to evaluate the roles of these genes andautophagy in the development of esophageal cancer In addi-tion autophagy could be responsible for the poor prognosisand chemoresistance that are observed in esophageal cancerpatients The overexpression of the FOXO3 MYD88 andGAPDHgenes could lead to the induction of autophagy genesin esophageal cancer Thus these genes are candidates fortargeting autophagy and tumorigenesis in esophageal cancer
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Grant no 24141 from ResearchCouncil of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences(TUMS)
References
[1] J Kmet and E Mahboubi ldquoEsophageal cancer in the Caspianlittoral of Iran initial studiesrdquo Science vol 175 no 4024 pp846ndash853 1972
8 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
[2] F Bray J-S Ren E Masuyer and J Ferlay ldquoGlobal estimates ofcancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008rdquoInternational Journal of Cancer vol 132 pp 1133ndash1145 2013
[3] T Anayama M Furihata T Takeuchi et al ldquoInsufficient effectof p27(KIP1) to inhibit cyclin D1 in human esophageal cancer invitrordquo International Journal of Oncology vol 18 no 1 pp 151ndash155 2001
[4] U Ribeiro S D Finkelstein A V Safatle-Ribeiro et al ldquop53sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome ofpatients with esophageal carcinomardquo Cancer vol 83 pp 7ndash181998
[5] R Ralhan S Arora T K Chattopadhyay N K Shukla and MMathur ldquoCirculating p53 antibodies p53 gene mutational pro-file and product accumulation in esophageal squamous-cell car-cinoma in Indiardquo International Journal of Cancer vol 85 pp791ndash795 2000
[6] M E Nita H Nagawa O Tominaga et al ldquop21Waf1Cip1 ex-pression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected eso-phageal squamous cell carcinoma but not p27Kip1 p53 or RbrdquoAnnals of Surgical Oncology vol 6 no 5 pp 481ndash488 1999
[7] P Maycotte and A Thorburn ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoCancer Biology andTherapy vol 11 no 2 pp 127ndash137 2011
[8] L Moretti E S Yang K W Kim and B Lu ldquoAutophagy sig-naling in cancer and its potential as novel target to improveanticancer therapyrdquoDrug ResistanceUpdates vol 10 no 4-5 pp135ndash143 2007
[9] N Chen and J Debnath ldquoAutophagy and tumorigenesisrdquo FEBSLetters vol 584 no 7 pp 1427ndash1435 2010
[10] L Yang Y Yu R Kang et al ldquoUp-regulated autophagy by en-dogenous highmobility group box-1 promotes chemoresistancein leukemia cellsrdquo Leukemia and Lymphoma vol 53 no 2 pp315ndash322 2012
[11] D J Klionsky and S D Emr ldquoAutophagy as a regulated pathwayof cellular degradationrdquo Science vol 290 no 5497 pp 1717ndash17212000
[12] D Glick S Barth and K F Macleod ldquoAutophagy cellular andmolecular mechanismsrdquo Journal of Pathology vol 221 no 1 pp3ndash12 2010
[13] Y Kondo T Kanzawa R Sawaya and S Kondo ldquoThe roleof autophagy in cancer development and response to therapyrdquoNature Reviews Cancer vol 5 no 9 pp 726ndash734 2005
[14] Y Kondo and S Kondo ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoAutophagy vol 2 no 2 pp 85ndash90 2006
[15] C Mammucari G Milan V Romanello et al ldquoFoxO3 controlsautophagy in skeletal muscle in vivordquo Cell Metabolism vol 6no 6 pp 458ndash471 2007
[16] J Zhao J J Brault A Schild et al ldquoFoxO3 coordinately activatesprotein degradation by the autophagiclysosomal and proteaso-mal pathways in atrophying muscle cellsrdquo Cell Metabolism vol6 no 6 pp 472ndash483 2007
[17] J Zhou W Liao J Yang et al ldquoFOXO3 induces FOXO1-de-pendent autophagy by activating the AKT1 signaling pathwayrdquoAutophagy vol 8 pp 1712ndash1723 2012
[18] R Medzhitov P Preston-Hurlburt E Kopp et al ldquoMyD88 isan adaptor protein in the hTollIL-1 receptor family signalingpathwaysrdquoMolecular Cell vol 2 no 2 pp 253ndash258 1998
[19] E L Wang Z R Qian M Nakasono et al ldquoHigh expressionof Toll-like receptor 4myeloid differentiation factor 88 signalscorrelates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancerrdquo BritishJournal of Cancer vol 102 no 5 pp 908ndash915 2010
[20] J H Wang B J Manning Q D Wu S Blankson D Bouchier-Hayes and H P Redmond ldquoEndotoxinlipopolysaccharideactivates NF-120581b and enhances tumor cell adhesion and inva-sion through a 1205731 integrin-dependent mechanismrdquo Journal ofImmunology vol 170 no 2 pp 795ndash804 2003
[21] C-S Shi and J H Kehrl ldquoMyD88 and Trif target Beclin 1 totrigger autophagy in macrophagesrdquo Journal of Biological Chem-istry vol 283 no 48 pp 33175ndash33182 2008
[22] A Colell J-E Ricci S Tait et al ldquoGAPDH and autophagy pre-serve survival after apoptotic cytochrome c release in theabsence of caspase activationrdquo Cell vol 129 no 5 pp 983ndash9972007
[23] S Jin and E White ldquoRole of autophagy in cancer managementof metabolic stressrdquo Autophagy vol 3 no 1 pp 28ndash31 2007
[24] T R OrsquoDonovan G C OrsquoSullivan and S L McKenna ldquoInduc-tion of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cellspromotes their survival and recovery following treatment withchemotherapeuticsrdquo Autophagy vol 7 no 5 pp 509ndash524 2011
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Parkinsonrsquos Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
4 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Table1Designedprim
erssequences
used
toqu
antifygene
expressio
nby
real-timeP
CR
Application
Prim
ername
Accessionnu
mber
Leng
thSequ
ence
(51015840
to31015840)
Ann
ealin
gtemperature
Locatio
nProd
uctsize
Overexpressed
genes
FOXO
3-F
NM
0014553
20AC
GGTG
TTCG
GAC
CTTC
ATC
60∘
C1613ndash1632
196b
pFO
XO3-R
NM
0014553
20TG
CTGGCC
TGAG
ACAT
CAAG
1789ndash1808
GAPD
H-F
NM
002046
420
CGAC
AGTC
AGCC
GCA
TCTT
C61∘
C118
ndash137
250b
pGAPD
H-R
NM
002046
420
CGTT
CTCA
GCC
TTGAC
GGTG
348ndash367
MYD
88-v1-F
NM
00117
25671
20TC
ATCG
AAAAG
AGGTT
GGCT
57∘
C855ndash875
158b
pMYD
88-v1-R
NM
00117
25671
20GAT
GGGGAT
CAGTC
GCT
TCT
993ndash1012
MYD
88-v2-F
NM
0024684
20CC
ACAC
TTGAT
GAC
CCCC
TG61∘
C66
6ndash685
210b
pMYD
88-v2-R
NM
0024684
20GGCG
GCA
CCTC
TTTT
CGAT
G856ndash
875
MYD
88-v3-F
NM
00117
25681
20GGGAC
CCAG
CATT
GGGCA
TA61∘
C538ndash557
289b
pMYD
88-v3-R
NM
00117
25681
20AC
CTGGAG
AGAG
GCT
GAG
TG807ndash826
MYD
88-v4-F
NM
00117
25691
20CT
TGAT
GAC
CCCC
TGGGTG
C62∘
C671ndash690
207b
pMYD
88-v4-R
NM
00117
25691
20GGTT
GGTG
TAGTC
GCA
GAC
A858ndash877
MYD
88-v5-F
NM
00117
25661
17AC
CCAG
CATT
GGTG
CCG
60∘
C541ndash557
202b
pMYD
88-v5-R
NM
00117
2566
120
GGTT
GGTG
TAGTC
GCA
GAC
A723ndash742
Con
trolgene
ACTB
-FNM
0011013
21AT
GGCC
ACGGCT
GCT
TCCA
GC
60∘
C763ndash783
322b
pAC
TB-R
NM
0011013
21CA
GGAG
GAG
CAAT
GAT
CTTG
A1064
ndash1084
Autoph
agy-relatedgenes
Gabarapl1-F
NM
0314122
20CA
GGGTC
CCCG
TGAT
TGTA
G61∘
C321ndash340
179b
pGabarapl1-R
NM
0314122
20TG
GGAG
GGAT
GGTG
TTGTT
G480ndash
499
Beclin1-F
NM
003766
320
GCT
GAAG
ACAG
AGCG
ATGGT
595∘
C30ndash4
9169b
pBe
clin1-R
NM
003766
320
CATG
GTG
CTGTT
GTT
GGAC
G179ndash
198
PIK3
C3-F
NM
0026472
20GGCA
CACA
GAG
TGAG
CAGTA
595∘
C2423ndash244
2204b
pPIK3
C3-R
NM
0026472
20CA
CAGCC
TCTT
CATC
CGAC
A2607ndash2626
ATG12-F
NM
0047073
20TG
CTGGAG
GGGAAG
GAC
TTA
595∘
C347ndash366
186b
pAT
G12-R
NM
0047073
20GTT
CGCT
CTAC
TGCC
CACT
T513ndash532
MAP1LC
3B-F
NM
0228184
20GCC
GCC
TTTT
TGGGTA
GAAG
595∘
C1012ndash1031
225b
pMAP1LC
3B-F
NM
0228184
20TA
CCCC
TGCA
AGAG
TGAG
GA
1217ndash1236
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 204 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v1-F MYD88-v1-R
686 687 891 892 983 984 2874Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v3-F MYD88-v3-R
552 732 733 824 825 2715Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v4-F MYD88-v4-R
686 687 778 779 2669Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v5-F MYD88-v5-R
552 643 644 2534Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v2-F MYD88-v2-R
686 687 867 868 959 960 2850Exon 3a Exon 4 Exon 5
MYD88 variant 1
MYD88 variant 2
MYD88 variant 3
MYD88 variant 4
MYD88 variant 5
NM 0011725671
NM 0024684
NM 0011725681
NM 0011725691
NM 0011725661
Figure 1 Alternative splicing variants of the MYD88 gene and designed primers locations
DN
Ala
dder
Forw
ard
libra
ry
1000 bp
250bp
(a)
Nonsubtracted library Subtracted library00
02
04
06
08
10
12
Fold
chan
ge
1
0103
(b)
Figure 2 Construction of the SSH library (a) Forward constructed library (Lane 2) which ranges in length from 180 to 1200 bp (b) Evaluationof the subtraction efficiency of the constructed library The relative expression levels of the beta actin gene in the two samples indicate thatthere is a 97-fold decrease in beta actin expression in the subtracted cDNAs
autophagy and is involved in the induction of autophagy inresponse to intracellular signals was 2704-fold higher intumor tissues than in normal tissues (Figure 3) Correlationof FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes is represented in Table 2
4 Discussion
Autophagy is categorized as a protein degradation systemwhich participates in the cellular homeostasis that is typicallyobserved in nutrient-deprived cells In this process excess orunnecessary proteins and organelles are fused to lysosomesand digested by lysosomal enzymes [11 12] In the earlystages of the tumorigenesis and during cancer treatmentautophagy induction fortifies cancer cell growth in thetumor microenvironment by protecting cells from nutrient
deprivation and providing an alternative energy source forcancer cells [13 14]
In this study suppression subtractive hybridization wasused to identify the overexpressed genes FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH which have potential roles in the induction ofautophagy in esophageal cancer cells Upregulation of thesegenes was confirmed in esophageal cancer samples usingqRT-PCR
The work presented here identified the FOXO3 geneas being overexpressed in esophageal cancer This genebelongs to a family of transcription proteins that is involvedin the regulation of autophagy Autophagy-related genes(eg LC3 and BNIP3) are directly upregulated by FOXO3[15 16] In addition previous studies revealed that FOXO3overexpression induced autophagy in the HEK293T cell line[17] Our results indicated that FOXO3 was upregulated
6 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
0
5
10
15
20
SSH library overexpressed genes
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
FOXO
3
GA
PDH
MYD
88
v1
MYD
88
v2
MYD
88
v3
MYD
88
v5
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(a)
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Autophagy-related genes
Becli
n1
ATG12
Gab
arap
l1
PIK3
C3 LC3
lowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowastlowastlowast
lowastlowast
(b)
Figure 3 Relative expression of genes identified from the SSH library MYD88 isoforms- and autophagy-related genes in esophageal cancertissues assessed using real-time PCR (a) Relative expression levels of genes that are overexpressed in esophageal tumor (FOXO3 GAPDHand MYD88 variants) Expression of MYD88v4 was not detectable in samples (b) Detection of autophagy in esophageal tumors Relativeexpression of autophagy-related genes (Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl1 LC3 and PIK3C3) in esophageal tumor tissues (e) represent the meanand whiskers the SEM of expression in samples (119899 = 10) lowast
119875
lt 005 lowastlowast119875
lt 001
Table 2 Correlations of FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes
LC3 Gabarapl1 ATG12 PIK3C3 Beclin1FOXO3 0000 0007 0007 0000 0000MYD88v1 0000 0500 0007 0007 0000MYD88v2 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000MYD88v3 0000 0062 0000 0007 0000MYD88v5 0062 0062 0062 0062 0229GAPDH 0062 0500 0000 0000 0062Correlations were considered significant when 119875 lt 001
950900850800750700650
200000
150000
100000
50000
Der
ivat
ive r
epor
ter (minus
Rn998400)
Temperature (∘C)
MYD88v5Tm 8471∘C
MYD88v3Tm 8799∘C
MYD88v2
Tm 862∘C
MYD88v1
Tm 859∘C
MYD88v4Tm unknown
Figure 4 Melting curve analysis of MYD88 variants Peaks showeach variant and its melting temperature in ∘C Expression ofMYD88v4 was not detectable
5187-fold in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3 overexpres-sion in cancer cells could be related to nutrient deprivationstress and other stimulatory factors that lead to autophagyinduction Elevated expression of the transcription factorFOXO3 induces autophagy protein expression and promotesthe induction of autophagy
MYD88 is another overexpressed gene in the con-structed library MYD88 is a cytosolic adaptor protein in theinterleukin-1 (IL-1) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalingpathways which have critical roles in innate and adaptiveimmunity [18] Previous studies demonstrated that MYD88has an important function in tumorigenesis and high levelsof MYD88 correlate with poor prognosis in patients withcolorectal cancers [19] Lipopolysaccharides a TLR receptorligand upregulates 120573-1 integrin which leads to tumor cell-endothelial cell adhesion tumor cell-extracellular matrixadhesion and tumor cell invasion of the extracellular matrix[20] In addition MYD88 promotes tumor cell proliferationvia NF-120581B activation Previous studies demonstrated a directinteraction between MYD88 and Beclin1 Interaction of
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 7
MYD88 with Beclin1 reduces Beclin1 binding to Bcl-2 whichleads to autophagy induction in cancer cells [21] Our resultsrevealed for the first time that MYD88 variants are upreg-ulated in esophageal cancer tissues compared with normaltissues Our findings indicated that MYD88 overexpressioncould lead to autophagy in esophageal cancer The cause ofMYD88 overexpression in esophageal cancer tissues likelyoriginates from the extracellular tumor matrix where thepresence of mucin could trigger prolonged activation of TLRreceptors and subsequent upregulation of MYD88 Com-pared with normal esophageal tissues there was a significantreduction in MYD88v3 levels and a significant increase inMYD88v1 levels in esophageal tumor tissues Interaction ofMYD88 with Beclin1 has been previously demonstrated butno information is available concerning the participation ofindividual exons in this interaction thus the role of each ofthe MYD88 variants in the interaction with Beclin1 and thesubsequent induction of autophagy remains to be elucidated
GAPDH is a key protein in the production of energyOverexpression of GAPDH has been reported in cancersand the primary role for GAPDH was proposed to beits pivotal function in glycolysis However cooperation ofGAPDH with ATG12 could induce autophagy instead ofcaspase-independent cell death (CICD) [22] After apoptoticcytochrome c release without caspase activation whichleads to CICD GAPDH elevates ATP levels in the cells byinducing glycolysis and cooperates with ATG12 to shift thecells away from CICD and toward autophagy In our SSHlibrary GAPDH was identified as an overexpressed genewith a 4659-fold induction Nutrient deprivation hypoxiaand high levels of cell division demand additional energyresources and GAPDH overexpression could alleviate thesedemands by inducing both glycolysis and autophagy inesophageal cancer cells
Because this is the first report of the overexpression of theFOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 genes in esophageal cancercells the precise role of these genes in esophageal cancerremains to be elucidated Significant correlations betweenthe expression levels of these genes and those of autophagy-related genes point to a potential role for these genes in theinduction of autophagy Prolonged autophagy induction intumor tissues and degradation of autophagy-related proteinsvia autophagosome formation leads to the upregulation ofautophagy-related genes in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3overexpression correlated with expression of the Gabarapl1ATG12 PIK3C3 LC3 and Beclin1 genes in cancer tissues Inlight of its transcriptional activity and regulatory effects onthe process of autophagy in skeletal muscle FOXO3 couldincrease the expression level of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer tissues [15] A significant correlationwas observed between the expression of GAPDH and theautophagy-related genes ATG12 and PIK3C3 in the tissuesamples This correlation could be related to the autophagy-induction activity of GAPDH which causes a subsequentupregulation of autophagy-related genes Overexpression ofMYD88v1 MYD88v2 and MYD88v3 correlated with upreg-ulation of the autophagy-related genes Beclin1 ATG12LC3 and PIK3C3 This correlation could be related to the
induction of autophagy via TLR receptors which leads toMYD88 upregulation
The results of this study suggest that the induction ofautophagy in cancerous tissues is an important event inthe molecular biology and tumorigenesis of esophageal can-cer Tumor cells experience metabolic stress and starvationcaused by increased proliferation and cell metabolism andhypoxia caused by inadequate angiogenesis in which ATPproduction is inefficientThese environmental stresses induceautophagy in tumor cells located far from the blood vessels[23] Autophagy decreases the energy consumption of tumorcells by reducing metabolic stress and eliminating cellularorganelles that limit damage Autophagy has previously beenstudied as a target for the development of new therapiesfor esophageal cancer because inhibition of autophagy hasthe potential to sensitize tumor cells including chemore-sistant cells to therapeutic agents [24] To date autophagyhas not been considered a fundamental molecular eventin esophageal cancer and the role of autophagy in thetumorigenesis of this cancer has not been addressed There-fore future studies that focus on autophagy as a target forcancer therapeutics are necessary Because of intraepithelialneoplasia importance in tumorigenesis of esophageal canceroccurrence of autophagy and expression of FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH genes should be studied in this stage Thiscould reveal the role of the above genes in the early stage oftumorigenesis
In conclusion using the SSH method our study revealedfor the first time that the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDHgenes are overexpressed in esophageal cancer In additionthere was a significant correlation between overexpressionof these genes and upregulation of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer Considering the fundamental role ofautophagy in tumorigenesis and the high expression levels ofFOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH in esophageal cancer furtherstudies are needed to evaluate the roles of these genes andautophagy in the development of esophageal cancer In addi-tion autophagy could be responsible for the poor prognosisand chemoresistance that are observed in esophageal cancerpatients The overexpression of the FOXO3 MYD88 andGAPDHgenes could lead to the induction of autophagy genesin esophageal cancer Thus these genes are candidates fortargeting autophagy and tumorigenesis in esophageal cancer
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Grant no 24141 from ResearchCouncil of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences(TUMS)
References
[1] J Kmet and E Mahboubi ldquoEsophageal cancer in the Caspianlittoral of Iran initial studiesrdquo Science vol 175 no 4024 pp846ndash853 1972
8 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
[2] F Bray J-S Ren E Masuyer and J Ferlay ldquoGlobal estimates ofcancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008rdquoInternational Journal of Cancer vol 132 pp 1133ndash1145 2013
[3] T Anayama M Furihata T Takeuchi et al ldquoInsufficient effectof p27(KIP1) to inhibit cyclin D1 in human esophageal cancer invitrordquo International Journal of Oncology vol 18 no 1 pp 151ndash155 2001
[4] U Ribeiro S D Finkelstein A V Safatle-Ribeiro et al ldquop53sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome ofpatients with esophageal carcinomardquo Cancer vol 83 pp 7ndash181998
[5] R Ralhan S Arora T K Chattopadhyay N K Shukla and MMathur ldquoCirculating p53 antibodies p53 gene mutational pro-file and product accumulation in esophageal squamous-cell car-cinoma in Indiardquo International Journal of Cancer vol 85 pp791ndash795 2000
[6] M E Nita H Nagawa O Tominaga et al ldquop21Waf1Cip1 ex-pression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected eso-phageal squamous cell carcinoma but not p27Kip1 p53 or RbrdquoAnnals of Surgical Oncology vol 6 no 5 pp 481ndash488 1999
[7] P Maycotte and A Thorburn ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoCancer Biology andTherapy vol 11 no 2 pp 127ndash137 2011
[8] L Moretti E S Yang K W Kim and B Lu ldquoAutophagy sig-naling in cancer and its potential as novel target to improveanticancer therapyrdquoDrug ResistanceUpdates vol 10 no 4-5 pp135ndash143 2007
[9] N Chen and J Debnath ldquoAutophagy and tumorigenesisrdquo FEBSLetters vol 584 no 7 pp 1427ndash1435 2010
[10] L Yang Y Yu R Kang et al ldquoUp-regulated autophagy by en-dogenous highmobility group box-1 promotes chemoresistancein leukemia cellsrdquo Leukemia and Lymphoma vol 53 no 2 pp315ndash322 2012
[11] D J Klionsky and S D Emr ldquoAutophagy as a regulated pathwayof cellular degradationrdquo Science vol 290 no 5497 pp 1717ndash17212000
[12] D Glick S Barth and K F Macleod ldquoAutophagy cellular andmolecular mechanismsrdquo Journal of Pathology vol 221 no 1 pp3ndash12 2010
[13] Y Kondo T Kanzawa R Sawaya and S Kondo ldquoThe roleof autophagy in cancer development and response to therapyrdquoNature Reviews Cancer vol 5 no 9 pp 726ndash734 2005
[14] Y Kondo and S Kondo ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoAutophagy vol 2 no 2 pp 85ndash90 2006
[15] C Mammucari G Milan V Romanello et al ldquoFoxO3 controlsautophagy in skeletal muscle in vivordquo Cell Metabolism vol 6no 6 pp 458ndash471 2007
[16] J Zhao J J Brault A Schild et al ldquoFoxO3 coordinately activatesprotein degradation by the autophagiclysosomal and proteaso-mal pathways in atrophying muscle cellsrdquo Cell Metabolism vol6 no 6 pp 472ndash483 2007
[17] J Zhou W Liao J Yang et al ldquoFOXO3 induces FOXO1-de-pendent autophagy by activating the AKT1 signaling pathwayrdquoAutophagy vol 8 pp 1712ndash1723 2012
[18] R Medzhitov P Preston-Hurlburt E Kopp et al ldquoMyD88 isan adaptor protein in the hTollIL-1 receptor family signalingpathwaysrdquoMolecular Cell vol 2 no 2 pp 253ndash258 1998
[19] E L Wang Z R Qian M Nakasono et al ldquoHigh expressionof Toll-like receptor 4myeloid differentiation factor 88 signalscorrelates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancerrdquo BritishJournal of Cancer vol 102 no 5 pp 908ndash915 2010
[20] J H Wang B J Manning Q D Wu S Blankson D Bouchier-Hayes and H P Redmond ldquoEndotoxinlipopolysaccharideactivates NF-120581b and enhances tumor cell adhesion and inva-sion through a 1205731 integrin-dependent mechanismrdquo Journal ofImmunology vol 170 no 2 pp 795ndash804 2003
[21] C-S Shi and J H Kehrl ldquoMyD88 and Trif target Beclin 1 totrigger autophagy in macrophagesrdquo Journal of Biological Chem-istry vol 283 no 48 pp 33175ndash33182 2008
[22] A Colell J-E Ricci S Tait et al ldquoGAPDH and autophagy pre-serve survival after apoptotic cytochrome c release in theabsence of caspase activationrdquo Cell vol 129 no 5 pp 983ndash9972007
[23] S Jin and E White ldquoRole of autophagy in cancer managementof metabolic stressrdquo Autophagy vol 3 no 1 pp 28ndash31 2007
[24] T R OrsquoDonovan G C OrsquoSullivan and S L McKenna ldquoInduc-tion of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cellspromotes their survival and recovery following treatment withchemotherapeuticsrdquo Autophagy vol 7 no 5 pp 509ndash524 2011
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Parkinsonrsquos Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 204 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v1-F MYD88-v1-R
686 687 891 892 983 984 2874Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v3-F MYD88-v3-R
552 732 733 824 825 2715Exon 3 Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v4-F MYD88-v4-R
686 687 778 779 2669Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551
MYD88-v5-F MYD88-v5-R
552 643 644 2534Exon 4 Exon 5
Exon 1 Exon 2Exon location 1
Exon size 550 bp 134 bp 180 bp 91 bp 1890 bp
551 552
MYD88-v2-F MYD88-v2-R
686 687 867 868 959 960 2850Exon 3a Exon 4 Exon 5
MYD88 variant 1
MYD88 variant 2
MYD88 variant 3
MYD88 variant 4
MYD88 variant 5
NM 0011725671
NM 0024684
NM 0011725681
NM 0011725691
NM 0011725661
Figure 1 Alternative splicing variants of the MYD88 gene and designed primers locations
DN
Ala
dder
Forw
ard
libra
ry
1000 bp
250bp
(a)
Nonsubtracted library Subtracted library00
02
04
06
08
10
12
Fold
chan
ge
1
0103
(b)
Figure 2 Construction of the SSH library (a) Forward constructed library (Lane 2) which ranges in length from 180 to 1200 bp (b) Evaluationof the subtraction efficiency of the constructed library The relative expression levels of the beta actin gene in the two samples indicate thatthere is a 97-fold decrease in beta actin expression in the subtracted cDNAs
autophagy and is involved in the induction of autophagy inresponse to intracellular signals was 2704-fold higher intumor tissues than in normal tissues (Figure 3) Correlationof FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes is represented in Table 2
4 Discussion
Autophagy is categorized as a protein degradation systemwhich participates in the cellular homeostasis that is typicallyobserved in nutrient-deprived cells In this process excess orunnecessary proteins and organelles are fused to lysosomesand digested by lysosomal enzymes [11 12] In the earlystages of the tumorigenesis and during cancer treatmentautophagy induction fortifies cancer cell growth in thetumor microenvironment by protecting cells from nutrient
deprivation and providing an alternative energy source forcancer cells [13 14]
In this study suppression subtractive hybridization wasused to identify the overexpressed genes FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH which have potential roles in the induction ofautophagy in esophageal cancer cells Upregulation of thesegenes was confirmed in esophageal cancer samples usingqRT-PCR
The work presented here identified the FOXO3 geneas being overexpressed in esophageal cancer This genebelongs to a family of transcription proteins that is involvedin the regulation of autophagy Autophagy-related genes(eg LC3 and BNIP3) are directly upregulated by FOXO3[15 16] In addition previous studies revealed that FOXO3overexpression induced autophagy in the HEK293T cell line[17] Our results indicated that FOXO3 was upregulated
6 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
0
5
10
15
20
SSH library overexpressed genes
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
FOXO
3
GA
PDH
MYD
88
v1
MYD
88
v2
MYD
88
v3
MYD
88
v5
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(a)
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Autophagy-related genes
Becli
n1
ATG12
Gab
arap
l1
PIK3
C3 LC3
lowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowastlowastlowast
lowastlowast
(b)
Figure 3 Relative expression of genes identified from the SSH library MYD88 isoforms- and autophagy-related genes in esophageal cancertissues assessed using real-time PCR (a) Relative expression levels of genes that are overexpressed in esophageal tumor (FOXO3 GAPDHand MYD88 variants) Expression of MYD88v4 was not detectable in samples (b) Detection of autophagy in esophageal tumors Relativeexpression of autophagy-related genes (Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl1 LC3 and PIK3C3) in esophageal tumor tissues (e) represent the meanand whiskers the SEM of expression in samples (119899 = 10) lowast
119875
lt 005 lowastlowast119875
lt 001
Table 2 Correlations of FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes
LC3 Gabarapl1 ATG12 PIK3C3 Beclin1FOXO3 0000 0007 0007 0000 0000MYD88v1 0000 0500 0007 0007 0000MYD88v2 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000MYD88v3 0000 0062 0000 0007 0000MYD88v5 0062 0062 0062 0062 0229GAPDH 0062 0500 0000 0000 0062Correlations were considered significant when 119875 lt 001
950900850800750700650
200000
150000
100000
50000
Der
ivat
ive r
epor
ter (minus
Rn998400)
Temperature (∘C)
MYD88v5Tm 8471∘C
MYD88v3Tm 8799∘C
MYD88v2
Tm 862∘C
MYD88v1
Tm 859∘C
MYD88v4Tm unknown
Figure 4 Melting curve analysis of MYD88 variants Peaks showeach variant and its melting temperature in ∘C Expression ofMYD88v4 was not detectable
5187-fold in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3 overexpres-sion in cancer cells could be related to nutrient deprivationstress and other stimulatory factors that lead to autophagyinduction Elevated expression of the transcription factorFOXO3 induces autophagy protein expression and promotesthe induction of autophagy
MYD88 is another overexpressed gene in the con-structed library MYD88 is a cytosolic adaptor protein in theinterleukin-1 (IL-1) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalingpathways which have critical roles in innate and adaptiveimmunity [18] Previous studies demonstrated that MYD88has an important function in tumorigenesis and high levelsof MYD88 correlate with poor prognosis in patients withcolorectal cancers [19] Lipopolysaccharides a TLR receptorligand upregulates 120573-1 integrin which leads to tumor cell-endothelial cell adhesion tumor cell-extracellular matrixadhesion and tumor cell invasion of the extracellular matrix[20] In addition MYD88 promotes tumor cell proliferationvia NF-120581B activation Previous studies demonstrated a directinteraction between MYD88 and Beclin1 Interaction of
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 7
MYD88 with Beclin1 reduces Beclin1 binding to Bcl-2 whichleads to autophagy induction in cancer cells [21] Our resultsrevealed for the first time that MYD88 variants are upreg-ulated in esophageal cancer tissues compared with normaltissues Our findings indicated that MYD88 overexpressioncould lead to autophagy in esophageal cancer The cause ofMYD88 overexpression in esophageal cancer tissues likelyoriginates from the extracellular tumor matrix where thepresence of mucin could trigger prolonged activation of TLRreceptors and subsequent upregulation of MYD88 Com-pared with normal esophageal tissues there was a significantreduction in MYD88v3 levels and a significant increase inMYD88v1 levels in esophageal tumor tissues Interaction ofMYD88 with Beclin1 has been previously demonstrated butno information is available concerning the participation ofindividual exons in this interaction thus the role of each ofthe MYD88 variants in the interaction with Beclin1 and thesubsequent induction of autophagy remains to be elucidated
GAPDH is a key protein in the production of energyOverexpression of GAPDH has been reported in cancersand the primary role for GAPDH was proposed to beits pivotal function in glycolysis However cooperation ofGAPDH with ATG12 could induce autophagy instead ofcaspase-independent cell death (CICD) [22] After apoptoticcytochrome c release without caspase activation whichleads to CICD GAPDH elevates ATP levels in the cells byinducing glycolysis and cooperates with ATG12 to shift thecells away from CICD and toward autophagy In our SSHlibrary GAPDH was identified as an overexpressed genewith a 4659-fold induction Nutrient deprivation hypoxiaand high levels of cell division demand additional energyresources and GAPDH overexpression could alleviate thesedemands by inducing both glycolysis and autophagy inesophageal cancer cells
Because this is the first report of the overexpression of theFOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 genes in esophageal cancercells the precise role of these genes in esophageal cancerremains to be elucidated Significant correlations betweenthe expression levels of these genes and those of autophagy-related genes point to a potential role for these genes in theinduction of autophagy Prolonged autophagy induction intumor tissues and degradation of autophagy-related proteinsvia autophagosome formation leads to the upregulation ofautophagy-related genes in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3overexpression correlated with expression of the Gabarapl1ATG12 PIK3C3 LC3 and Beclin1 genes in cancer tissues Inlight of its transcriptional activity and regulatory effects onthe process of autophagy in skeletal muscle FOXO3 couldincrease the expression level of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer tissues [15] A significant correlationwas observed between the expression of GAPDH and theautophagy-related genes ATG12 and PIK3C3 in the tissuesamples This correlation could be related to the autophagy-induction activity of GAPDH which causes a subsequentupregulation of autophagy-related genes Overexpression ofMYD88v1 MYD88v2 and MYD88v3 correlated with upreg-ulation of the autophagy-related genes Beclin1 ATG12LC3 and PIK3C3 This correlation could be related to the
induction of autophagy via TLR receptors which leads toMYD88 upregulation
The results of this study suggest that the induction ofautophagy in cancerous tissues is an important event inthe molecular biology and tumorigenesis of esophageal can-cer Tumor cells experience metabolic stress and starvationcaused by increased proliferation and cell metabolism andhypoxia caused by inadequate angiogenesis in which ATPproduction is inefficientThese environmental stresses induceautophagy in tumor cells located far from the blood vessels[23] Autophagy decreases the energy consumption of tumorcells by reducing metabolic stress and eliminating cellularorganelles that limit damage Autophagy has previously beenstudied as a target for the development of new therapiesfor esophageal cancer because inhibition of autophagy hasthe potential to sensitize tumor cells including chemore-sistant cells to therapeutic agents [24] To date autophagyhas not been considered a fundamental molecular eventin esophageal cancer and the role of autophagy in thetumorigenesis of this cancer has not been addressed There-fore future studies that focus on autophagy as a target forcancer therapeutics are necessary Because of intraepithelialneoplasia importance in tumorigenesis of esophageal canceroccurrence of autophagy and expression of FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH genes should be studied in this stage Thiscould reveal the role of the above genes in the early stage oftumorigenesis
In conclusion using the SSH method our study revealedfor the first time that the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDHgenes are overexpressed in esophageal cancer In additionthere was a significant correlation between overexpressionof these genes and upregulation of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer Considering the fundamental role ofautophagy in tumorigenesis and the high expression levels ofFOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH in esophageal cancer furtherstudies are needed to evaluate the roles of these genes andautophagy in the development of esophageal cancer In addi-tion autophagy could be responsible for the poor prognosisand chemoresistance that are observed in esophageal cancerpatients The overexpression of the FOXO3 MYD88 andGAPDHgenes could lead to the induction of autophagy genesin esophageal cancer Thus these genes are candidates fortargeting autophagy and tumorigenesis in esophageal cancer
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Grant no 24141 from ResearchCouncil of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences(TUMS)
References
[1] J Kmet and E Mahboubi ldquoEsophageal cancer in the Caspianlittoral of Iran initial studiesrdquo Science vol 175 no 4024 pp846ndash853 1972
8 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
[2] F Bray J-S Ren E Masuyer and J Ferlay ldquoGlobal estimates ofcancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008rdquoInternational Journal of Cancer vol 132 pp 1133ndash1145 2013
[3] T Anayama M Furihata T Takeuchi et al ldquoInsufficient effectof p27(KIP1) to inhibit cyclin D1 in human esophageal cancer invitrordquo International Journal of Oncology vol 18 no 1 pp 151ndash155 2001
[4] U Ribeiro S D Finkelstein A V Safatle-Ribeiro et al ldquop53sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome ofpatients with esophageal carcinomardquo Cancer vol 83 pp 7ndash181998
[5] R Ralhan S Arora T K Chattopadhyay N K Shukla and MMathur ldquoCirculating p53 antibodies p53 gene mutational pro-file and product accumulation in esophageal squamous-cell car-cinoma in Indiardquo International Journal of Cancer vol 85 pp791ndash795 2000
[6] M E Nita H Nagawa O Tominaga et al ldquop21Waf1Cip1 ex-pression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected eso-phageal squamous cell carcinoma but not p27Kip1 p53 or RbrdquoAnnals of Surgical Oncology vol 6 no 5 pp 481ndash488 1999
[7] P Maycotte and A Thorburn ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoCancer Biology andTherapy vol 11 no 2 pp 127ndash137 2011
[8] L Moretti E S Yang K W Kim and B Lu ldquoAutophagy sig-naling in cancer and its potential as novel target to improveanticancer therapyrdquoDrug ResistanceUpdates vol 10 no 4-5 pp135ndash143 2007
[9] N Chen and J Debnath ldquoAutophagy and tumorigenesisrdquo FEBSLetters vol 584 no 7 pp 1427ndash1435 2010
[10] L Yang Y Yu R Kang et al ldquoUp-regulated autophagy by en-dogenous highmobility group box-1 promotes chemoresistancein leukemia cellsrdquo Leukemia and Lymphoma vol 53 no 2 pp315ndash322 2012
[11] D J Klionsky and S D Emr ldquoAutophagy as a regulated pathwayof cellular degradationrdquo Science vol 290 no 5497 pp 1717ndash17212000
[12] D Glick S Barth and K F Macleod ldquoAutophagy cellular andmolecular mechanismsrdquo Journal of Pathology vol 221 no 1 pp3ndash12 2010
[13] Y Kondo T Kanzawa R Sawaya and S Kondo ldquoThe roleof autophagy in cancer development and response to therapyrdquoNature Reviews Cancer vol 5 no 9 pp 726ndash734 2005
[14] Y Kondo and S Kondo ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoAutophagy vol 2 no 2 pp 85ndash90 2006
[15] C Mammucari G Milan V Romanello et al ldquoFoxO3 controlsautophagy in skeletal muscle in vivordquo Cell Metabolism vol 6no 6 pp 458ndash471 2007
[16] J Zhao J J Brault A Schild et al ldquoFoxO3 coordinately activatesprotein degradation by the autophagiclysosomal and proteaso-mal pathways in atrophying muscle cellsrdquo Cell Metabolism vol6 no 6 pp 472ndash483 2007
[17] J Zhou W Liao J Yang et al ldquoFOXO3 induces FOXO1-de-pendent autophagy by activating the AKT1 signaling pathwayrdquoAutophagy vol 8 pp 1712ndash1723 2012
[18] R Medzhitov P Preston-Hurlburt E Kopp et al ldquoMyD88 isan adaptor protein in the hTollIL-1 receptor family signalingpathwaysrdquoMolecular Cell vol 2 no 2 pp 253ndash258 1998
[19] E L Wang Z R Qian M Nakasono et al ldquoHigh expressionof Toll-like receptor 4myeloid differentiation factor 88 signalscorrelates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancerrdquo BritishJournal of Cancer vol 102 no 5 pp 908ndash915 2010
[20] J H Wang B J Manning Q D Wu S Blankson D Bouchier-Hayes and H P Redmond ldquoEndotoxinlipopolysaccharideactivates NF-120581b and enhances tumor cell adhesion and inva-sion through a 1205731 integrin-dependent mechanismrdquo Journal ofImmunology vol 170 no 2 pp 795ndash804 2003
[21] C-S Shi and J H Kehrl ldquoMyD88 and Trif target Beclin 1 totrigger autophagy in macrophagesrdquo Journal of Biological Chem-istry vol 283 no 48 pp 33175ndash33182 2008
[22] A Colell J-E Ricci S Tait et al ldquoGAPDH and autophagy pre-serve survival after apoptotic cytochrome c release in theabsence of caspase activationrdquo Cell vol 129 no 5 pp 983ndash9972007
[23] S Jin and E White ldquoRole of autophagy in cancer managementof metabolic stressrdquo Autophagy vol 3 no 1 pp 28ndash31 2007
[24] T R OrsquoDonovan G C OrsquoSullivan and S L McKenna ldquoInduc-tion of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cellspromotes their survival and recovery following treatment withchemotherapeuticsrdquo Autophagy vol 7 no 5 pp 509ndash524 2011
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Parkinsonrsquos Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
6 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
0
5
10
15
20
SSH library overexpressed genes
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
FOXO
3
GA
PDH
MYD
88
v1
MYD
88
v2
MYD
88
v3
MYD
88
v5
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowast
(a)
Fold
chan
ge (t
arge
t gen
eAC
TB)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Autophagy-related genes
Becli
n1
ATG12
Gab
arap
l1
PIK3
C3 LC3
lowast
lowastlowast
lowastlowastlowastlowast
lowastlowast
(b)
Figure 3 Relative expression of genes identified from the SSH library MYD88 isoforms- and autophagy-related genes in esophageal cancertissues assessed using real-time PCR (a) Relative expression levels of genes that are overexpressed in esophageal tumor (FOXO3 GAPDHand MYD88 variants) Expression of MYD88v4 was not detectable in samples (b) Detection of autophagy in esophageal tumors Relativeexpression of autophagy-related genes (Beclin1 ATG12 Gabarapl1 LC3 and PIK3C3) in esophageal tumor tissues (e) represent the meanand whiskers the SEM of expression in samples (119899 = 10) lowast
119875
lt 005 lowastlowast119875
lt 001
Table 2 Correlations of FOXO3 MYD88 isoforms and GAPDH with autophagy-related genes
LC3 Gabarapl1 ATG12 PIK3C3 Beclin1FOXO3 0000 0007 0007 0000 0000MYD88v1 0000 0500 0007 0007 0000MYD88v2 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000MYD88v3 0000 0062 0000 0007 0000MYD88v5 0062 0062 0062 0062 0229GAPDH 0062 0500 0000 0000 0062Correlations were considered significant when 119875 lt 001
950900850800750700650
200000
150000
100000
50000
Der
ivat
ive r
epor
ter (minus
Rn998400)
Temperature (∘C)
MYD88v5Tm 8471∘C
MYD88v3Tm 8799∘C
MYD88v2
Tm 862∘C
MYD88v1
Tm 859∘C
MYD88v4Tm unknown
Figure 4 Melting curve analysis of MYD88 variants Peaks showeach variant and its melting temperature in ∘C Expression ofMYD88v4 was not detectable
5187-fold in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3 overexpres-sion in cancer cells could be related to nutrient deprivationstress and other stimulatory factors that lead to autophagyinduction Elevated expression of the transcription factorFOXO3 induces autophagy protein expression and promotesthe induction of autophagy
MYD88 is another overexpressed gene in the con-structed library MYD88 is a cytosolic adaptor protein in theinterleukin-1 (IL-1) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalingpathways which have critical roles in innate and adaptiveimmunity [18] Previous studies demonstrated that MYD88has an important function in tumorigenesis and high levelsof MYD88 correlate with poor prognosis in patients withcolorectal cancers [19] Lipopolysaccharides a TLR receptorligand upregulates 120573-1 integrin which leads to tumor cell-endothelial cell adhesion tumor cell-extracellular matrixadhesion and tumor cell invasion of the extracellular matrix[20] In addition MYD88 promotes tumor cell proliferationvia NF-120581B activation Previous studies demonstrated a directinteraction between MYD88 and Beclin1 Interaction of
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 7
MYD88 with Beclin1 reduces Beclin1 binding to Bcl-2 whichleads to autophagy induction in cancer cells [21] Our resultsrevealed for the first time that MYD88 variants are upreg-ulated in esophageal cancer tissues compared with normaltissues Our findings indicated that MYD88 overexpressioncould lead to autophagy in esophageal cancer The cause ofMYD88 overexpression in esophageal cancer tissues likelyoriginates from the extracellular tumor matrix where thepresence of mucin could trigger prolonged activation of TLRreceptors and subsequent upregulation of MYD88 Com-pared with normal esophageal tissues there was a significantreduction in MYD88v3 levels and a significant increase inMYD88v1 levels in esophageal tumor tissues Interaction ofMYD88 with Beclin1 has been previously demonstrated butno information is available concerning the participation ofindividual exons in this interaction thus the role of each ofthe MYD88 variants in the interaction with Beclin1 and thesubsequent induction of autophagy remains to be elucidated
GAPDH is a key protein in the production of energyOverexpression of GAPDH has been reported in cancersand the primary role for GAPDH was proposed to beits pivotal function in glycolysis However cooperation ofGAPDH with ATG12 could induce autophagy instead ofcaspase-independent cell death (CICD) [22] After apoptoticcytochrome c release without caspase activation whichleads to CICD GAPDH elevates ATP levels in the cells byinducing glycolysis and cooperates with ATG12 to shift thecells away from CICD and toward autophagy In our SSHlibrary GAPDH was identified as an overexpressed genewith a 4659-fold induction Nutrient deprivation hypoxiaand high levels of cell division demand additional energyresources and GAPDH overexpression could alleviate thesedemands by inducing both glycolysis and autophagy inesophageal cancer cells
Because this is the first report of the overexpression of theFOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 genes in esophageal cancercells the precise role of these genes in esophageal cancerremains to be elucidated Significant correlations betweenthe expression levels of these genes and those of autophagy-related genes point to a potential role for these genes in theinduction of autophagy Prolonged autophagy induction intumor tissues and degradation of autophagy-related proteinsvia autophagosome formation leads to the upregulation ofautophagy-related genes in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3overexpression correlated with expression of the Gabarapl1ATG12 PIK3C3 LC3 and Beclin1 genes in cancer tissues Inlight of its transcriptional activity and regulatory effects onthe process of autophagy in skeletal muscle FOXO3 couldincrease the expression level of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer tissues [15] A significant correlationwas observed between the expression of GAPDH and theautophagy-related genes ATG12 and PIK3C3 in the tissuesamples This correlation could be related to the autophagy-induction activity of GAPDH which causes a subsequentupregulation of autophagy-related genes Overexpression ofMYD88v1 MYD88v2 and MYD88v3 correlated with upreg-ulation of the autophagy-related genes Beclin1 ATG12LC3 and PIK3C3 This correlation could be related to the
induction of autophagy via TLR receptors which leads toMYD88 upregulation
The results of this study suggest that the induction ofautophagy in cancerous tissues is an important event inthe molecular biology and tumorigenesis of esophageal can-cer Tumor cells experience metabolic stress and starvationcaused by increased proliferation and cell metabolism andhypoxia caused by inadequate angiogenesis in which ATPproduction is inefficientThese environmental stresses induceautophagy in tumor cells located far from the blood vessels[23] Autophagy decreases the energy consumption of tumorcells by reducing metabolic stress and eliminating cellularorganelles that limit damage Autophagy has previously beenstudied as a target for the development of new therapiesfor esophageal cancer because inhibition of autophagy hasthe potential to sensitize tumor cells including chemore-sistant cells to therapeutic agents [24] To date autophagyhas not been considered a fundamental molecular eventin esophageal cancer and the role of autophagy in thetumorigenesis of this cancer has not been addressed There-fore future studies that focus on autophagy as a target forcancer therapeutics are necessary Because of intraepithelialneoplasia importance in tumorigenesis of esophageal canceroccurrence of autophagy and expression of FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH genes should be studied in this stage Thiscould reveal the role of the above genes in the early stage oftumorigenesis
In conclusion using the SSH method our study revealedfor the first time that the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDHgenes are overexpressed in esophageal cancer In additionthere was a significant correlation between overexpressionof these genes and upregulation of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer Considering the fundamental role ofautophagy in tumorigenesis and the high expression levels ofFOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH in esophageal cancer furtherstudies are needed to evaluate the roles of these genes andautophagy in the development of esophageal cancer In addi-tion autophagy could be responsible for the poor prognosisand chemoresistance that are observed in esophageal cancerpatients The overexpression of the FOXO3 MYD88 andGAPDHgenes could lead to the induction of autophagy genesin esophageal cancer Thus these genes are candidates fortargeting autophagy and tumorigenesis in esophageal cancer
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Grant no 24141 from ResearchCouncil of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences(TUMS)
References
[1] J Kmet and E Mahboubi ldquoEsophageal cancer in the Caspianlittoral of Iran initial studiesrdquo Science vol 175 no 4024 pp846ndash853 1972
8 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
[2] F Bray J-S Ren E Masuyer and J Ferlay ldquoGlobal estimates ofcancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008rdquoInternational Journal of Cancer vol 132 pp 1133ndash1145 2013
[3] T Anayama M Furihata T Takeuchi et al ldquoInsufficient effectof p27(KIP1) to inhibit cyclin D1 in human esophageal cancer invitrordquo International Journal of Oncology vol 18 no 1 pp 151ndash155 2001
[4] U Ribeiro S D Finkelstein A V Safatle-Ribeiro et al ldquop53sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome ofpatients with esophageal carcinomardquo Cancer vol 83 pp 7ndash181998
[5] R Ralhan S Arora T K Chattopadhyay N K Shukla and MMathur ldquoCirculating p53 antibodies p53 gene mutational pro-file and product accumulation in esophageal squamous-cell car-cinoma in Indiardquo International Journal of Cancer vol 85 pp791ndash795 2000
[6] M E Nita H Nagawa O Tominaga et al ldquop21Waf1Cip1 ex-pression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected eso-phageal squamous cell carcinoma but not p27Kip1 p53 or RbrdquoAnnals of Surgical Oncology vol 6 no 5 pp 481ndash488 1999
[7] P Maycotte and A Thorburn ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoCancer Biology andTherapy vol 11 no 2 pp 127ndash137 2011
[8] L Moretti E S Yang K W Kim and B Lu ldquoAutophagy sig-naling in cancer and its potential as novel target to improveanticancer therapyrdquoDrug ResistanceUpdates vol 10 no 4-5 pp135ndash143 2007
[9] N Chen and J Debnath ldquoAutophagy and tumorigenesisrdquo FEBSLetters vol 584 no 7 pp 1427ndash1435 2010
[10] L Yang Y Yu R Kang et al ldquoUp-regulated autophagy by en-dogenous highmobility group box-1 promotes chemoresistancein leukemia cellsrdquo Leukemia and Lymphoma vol 53 no 2 pp315ndash322 2012
[11] D J Klionsky and S D Emr ldquoAutophagy as a regulated pathwayof cellular degradationrdquo Science vol 290 no 5497 pp 1717ndash17212000
[12] D Glick S Barth and K F Macleod ldquoAutophagy cellular andmolecular mechanismsrdquo Journal of Pathology vol 221 no 1 pp3ndash12 2010
[13] Y Kondo T Kanzawa R Sawaya and S Kondo ldquoThe roleof autophagy in cancer development and response to therapyrdquoNature Reviews Cancer vol 5 no 9 pp 726ndash734 2005
[14] Y Kondo and S Kondo ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoAutophagy vol 2 no 2 pp 85ndash90 2006
[15] C Mammucari G Milan V Romanello et al ldquoFoxO3 controlsautophagy in skeletal muscle in vivordquo Cell Metabolism vol 6no 6 pp 458ndash471 2007
[16] J Zhao J J Brault A Schild et al ldquoFoxO3 coordinately activatesprotein degradation by the autophagiclysosomal and proteaso-mal pathways in atrophying muscle cellsrdquo Cell Metabolism vol6 no 6 pp 472ndash483 2007
[17] J Zhou W Liao J Yang et al ldquoFOXO3 induces FOXO1-de-pendent autophagy by activating the AKT1 signaling pathwayrdquoAutophagy vol 8 pp 1712ndash1723 2012
[18] R Medzhitov P Preston-Hurlburt E Kopp et al ldquoMyD88 isan adaptor protein in the hTollIL-1 receptor family signalingpathwaysrdquoMolecular Cell vol 2 no 2 pp 253ndash258 1998
[19] E L Wang Z R Qian M Nakasono et al ldquoHigh expressionof Toll-like receptor 4myeloid differentiation factor 88 signalscorrelates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancerrdquo BritishJournal of Cancer vol 102 no 5 pp 908ndash915 2010
[20] J H Wang B J Manning Q D Wu S Blankson D Bouchier-Hayes and H P Redmond ldquoEndotoxinlipopolysaccharideactivates NF-120581b and enhances tumor cell adhesion and inva-sion through a 1205731 integrin-dependent mechanismrdquo Journal ofImmunology vol 170 no 2 pp 795ndash804 2003
[21] C-S Shi and J H Kehrl ldquoMyD88 and Trif target Beclin 1 totrigger autophagy in macrophagesrdquo Journal of Biological Chem-istry vol 283 no 48 pp 33175ndash33182 2008
[22] A Colell J-E Ricci S Tait et al ldquoGAPDH and autophagy pre-serve survival after apoptotic cytochrome c release in theabsence of caspase activationrdquo Cell vol 129 no 5 pp 983ndash9972007
[23] S Jin and E White ldquoRole of autophagy in cancer managementof metabolic stressrdquo Autophagy vol 3 no 1 pp 28ndash31 2007
[24] T R OrsquoDonovan G C OrsquoSullivan and S L McKenna ldquoInduc-tion of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cellspromotes their survival and recovery following treatment withchemotherapeuticsrdquo Autophagy vol 7 no 5 pp 509ndash524 2011
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Parkinsonrsquos Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Gastroenterology Research and Practice 7
MYD88 with Beclin1 reduces Beclin1 binding to Bcl-2 whichleads to autophagy induction in cancer cells [21] Our resultsrevealed for the first time that MYD88 variants are upreg-ulated in esophageal cancer tissues compared with normaltissues Our findings indicated that MYD88 overexpressioncould lead to autophagy in esophageal cancer The cause ofMYD88 overexpression in esophageal cancer tissues likelyoriginates from the extracellular tumor matrix where thepresence of mucin could trigger prolonged activation of TLRreceptors and subsequent upregulation of MYD88 Com-pared with normal esophageal tissues there was a significantreduction in MYD88v3 levels and a significant increase inMYD88v1 levels in esophageal tumor tissues Interaction ofMYD88 with Beclin1 has been previously demonstrated butno information is available concerning the participation ofindividual exons in this interaction thus the role of each ofthe MYD88 variants in the interaction with Beclin1 and thesubsequent induction of autophagy remains to be elucidated
GAPDH is a key protein in the production of energyOverexpression of GAPDH has been reported in cancersand the primary role for GAPDH was proposed to beits pivotal function in glycolysis However cooperation ofGAPDH with ATG12 could induce autophagy instead ofcaspase-independent cell death (CICD) [22] After apoptoticcytochrome c release without caspase activation whichleads to CICD GAPDH elevates ATP levels in the cells byinducing glycolysis and cooperates with ATG12 to shift thecells away from CICD and toward autophagy In our SSHlibrary GAPDH was identified as an overexpressed genewith a 4659-fold induction Nutrient deprivation hypoxiaand high levels of cell division demand additional energyresources and GAPDH overexpression could alleviate thesedemands by inducing both glycolysis and autophagy inesophageal cancer cells
Because this is the first report of the overexpression of theFOXO3 GAPDH and MYD88 genes in esophageal cancercells the precise role of these genes in esophageal cancerremains to be elucidated Significant correlations betweenthe expression levels of these genes and those of autophagy-related genes point to a potential role for these genes in theinduction of autophagy Prolonged autophagy induction intumor tissues and degradation of autophagy-related proteinsvia autophagosome formation leads to the upregulation ofautophagy-related genes in esophageal cancer tissues FOXO3overexpression correlated with expression of the Gabarapl1ATG12 PIK3C3 LC3 and Beclin1 genes in cancer tissues Inlight of its transcriptional activity and regulatory effects onthe process of autophagy in skeletal muscle FOXO3 couldincrease the expression level of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer tissues [15] A significant correlationwas observed between the expression of GAPDH and theautophagy-related genes ATG12 and PIK3C3 in the tissuesamples This correlation could be related to the autophagy-induction activity of GAPDH which causes a subsequentupregulation of autophagy-related genes Overexpression ofMYD88v1 MYD88v2 and MYD88v3 correlated with upreg-ulation of the autophagy-related genes Beclin1 ATG12LC3 and PIK3C3 This correlation could be related to the
induction of autophagy via TLR receptors which leads toMYD88 upregulation
The results of this study suggest that the induction ofautophagy in cancerous tissues is an important event inthe molecular biology and tumorigenesis of esophageal can-cer Tumor cells experience metabolic stress and starvationcaused by increased proliferation and cell metabolism andhypoxia caused by inadequate angiogenesis in which ATPproduction is inefficientThese environmental stresses induceautophagy in tumor cells located far from the blood vessels[23] Autophagy decreases the energy consumption of tumorcells by reducing metabolic stress and eliminating cellularorganelles that limit damage Autophagy has previously beenstudied as a target for the development of new therapiesfor esophageal cancer because inhibition of autophagy hasthe potential to sensitize tumor cells including chemore-sistant cells to therapeutic agents [24] To date autophagyhas not been considered a fundamental molecular eventin esophageal cancer and the role of autophagy in thetumorigenesis of this cancer has not been addressed There-fore future studies that focus on autophagy as a target forcancer therapeutics are necessary Because of intraepithelialneoplasia importance in tumorigenesis of esophageal canceroccurrence of autophagy and expression of FOXO3 MYD88and GAPDH genes should be studied in this stage Thiscould reveal the role of the above genes in the early stage oftumorigenesis
In conclusion using the SSH method our study revealedfor the first time that the FOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDHgenes are overexpressed in esophageal cancer In additionthere was a significant correlation between overexpressionof these genes and upregulation of autophagy-related genesin esophageal cancer Considering the fundamental role ofautophagy in tumorigenesis and the high expression levels ofFOXO3 MYD88 and GAPDH in esophageal cancer furtherstudies are needed to evaluate the roles of these genes andautophagy in the development of esophageal cancer In addi-tion autophagy could be responsible for the poor prognosisand chemoresistance that are observed in esophageal cancerpatients The overexpression of the FOXO3 MYD88 andGAPDHgenes could lead to the induction of autophagy genesin esophageal cancer Thus these genes are candidates fortargeting autophagy and tumorigenesis in esophageal cancer
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interestsregarding the publication of this paper
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by Grant no 24141 from ResearchCouncil of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences(TUMS)
References
[1] J Kmet and E Mahboubi ldquoEsophageal cancer in the Caspianlittoral of Iran initial studiesrdquo Science vol 175 no 4024 pp846ndash853 1972
8 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
[2] F Bray J-S Ren E Masuyer and J Ferlay ldquoGlobal estimates ofcancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008rdquoInternational Journal of Cancer vol 132 pp 1133ndash1145 2013
[3] T Anayama M Furihata T Takeuchi et al ldquoInsufficient effectof p27(KIP1) to inhibit cyclin D1 in human esophageal cancer invitrordquo International Journal of Oncology vol 18 no 1 pp 151ndash155 2001
[4] U Ribeiro S D Finkelstein A V Safatle-Ribeiro et al ldquop53sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome ofpatients with esophageal carcinomardquo Cancer vol 83 pp 7ndash181998
[5] R Ralhan S Arora T K Chattopadhyay N K Shukla and MMathur ldquoCirculating p53 antibodies p53 gene mutational pro-file and product accumulation in esophageal squamous-cell car-cinoma in Indiardquo International Journal of Cancer vol 85 pp791ndash795 2000
[6] M E Nita H Nagawa O Tominaga et al ldquop21Waf1Cip1 ex-pression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected eso-phageal squamous cell carcinoma but not p27Kip1 p53 or RbrdquoAnnals of Surgical Oncology vol 6 no 5 pp 481ndash488 1999
[7] P Maycotte and A Thorburn ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoCancer Biology andTherapy vol 11 no 2 pp 127ndash137 2011
[8] L Moretti E S Yang K W Kim and B Lu ldquoAutophagy sig-naling in cancer and its potential as novel target to improveanticancer therapyrdquoDrug ResistanceUpdates vol 10 no 4-5 pp135ndash143 2007
[9] N Chen and J Debnath ldquoAutophagy and tumorigenesisrdquo FEBSLetters vol 584 no 7 pp 1427ndash1435 2010
[10] L Yang Y Yu R Kang et al ldquoUp-regulated autophagy by en-dogenous highmobility group box-1 promotes chemoresistancein leukemia cellsrdquo Leukemia and Lymphoma vol 53 no 2 pp315ndash322 2012
[11] D J Klionsky and S D Emr ldquoAutophagy as a regulated pathwayof cellular degradationrdquo Science vol 290 no 5497 pp 1717ndash17212000
[12] D Glick S Barth and K F Macleod ldquoAutophagy cellular andmolecular mechanismsrdquo Journal of Pathology vol 221 no 1 pp3ndash12 2010
[13] Y Kondo T Kanzawa R Sawaya and S Kondo ldquoThe roleof autophagy in cancer development and response to therapyrdquoNature Reviews Cancer vol 5 no 9 pp 726ndash734 2005
[14] Y Kondo and S Kondo ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoAutophagy vol 2 no 2 pp 85ndash90 2006
[15] C Mammucari G Milan V Romanello et al ldquoFoxO3 controlsautophagy in skeletal muscle in vivordquo Cell Metabolism vol 6no 6 pp 458ndash471 2007
[16] J Zhao J J Brault A Schild et al ldquoFoxO3 coordinately activatesprotein degradation by the autophagiclysosomal and proteaso-mal pathways in atrophying muscle cellsrdquo Cell Metabolism vol6 no 6 pp 472ndash483 2007
[17] J Zhou W Liao J Yang et al ldquoFOXO3 induces FOXO1-de-pendent autophagy by activating the AKT1 signaling pathwayrdquoAutophagy vol 8 pp 1712ndash1723 2012
[18] R Medzhitov P Preston-Hurlburt E Kopp et al ldquoMyD88 isan adaptor protein in the hTollIL-1 receptor family signalingpathwaysrdquoMolecular Cell vol 2 no 2 pp 253ndash258 1998
[19] E L Wang Z R Qian M Nakasono et al ldquoHigh expressionof Toll-like receptor 4myeloid differentiation factor 88 signalscorrelates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancerrdquo BritishJournal of Cancer vol 102 no 5 pp 908ndash915 2010
[20] J H Wang B J Manning Q D Wu S Blankson D Bouchier-Hayes and H P Redmond ldquoEndotoxinlipopolysaccharideactivates NF-120581b and enhances tumor cell adhesion and inva-sion through a 1205731 integrin-dependent mechanismrdquo Journal ofImmunology vol 170 no 2 pp 795ndash804 2003
[21] C-S Shi and J H Kehrl ldquoMyD88 and Trif target Beclin 1 totrigger autophagy in macrophagesrdquo Journal of Biological Chem-istry vol 283 no 48 pp 33175ndash33182 2008
[22] A Colell J-E Ricci S Tait et al ldquoGAPDH and autophagy pre-serve survival after apoptotic cytochrome c release in theabsence of caspase activationrdquo Cell vol 129 no 5 pp 983ndash9972007
[23] S Jin and E White ldquoRole of autophagy in cancer managementof metabolic stressrdquo Autophagy vol 3 no 1 pp 28ndash31 2007
[24] T R OrsquoDonovan G C OrsquoSullivan and S L McKenna ldquoInduc-tion of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cellspromotes their survival and recovery following treatment withchemotherapeuticsrdquo Autophagy vol 7 no 5 pp 509ndash524 2011
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Parkinsonrsquos Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
8 Gastroenterology Research and Practice
[2] F Bray J-S Ren E Masuyer and J Ferlay ldquoGlobal estimates ofcancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008rdquoInternational Journal of Cancer vol 132 pp 1133ndash1145 2013
[3] T Anayama M Furihata T Takeuchi et al ldquoInsufficient effectof p27(KIP1) to inhibit cyclin D1 in human esophageal cancer invitrordquo International Journal of Oncology vol 18 no 1 pp 151ndash155 2001
[4] U Ribeiro S D Finkelstein A V Safatle-Ribeiro et al ldquop53sequence analysis predicts treatment response and outcome ofpatients with esophageal carcinomardquo Cancer vol 83 pp 7ndash181998
[5] R Ralhan S Arora T K Chattopadhyay N K Shukla and MMathur ldquoCirculating p53 antibodies p53 gene mutational pro-file and product accumulation in esophageal squamous-cell car-cinoma in Indiardquo International Journal of Cancer vol 85 pp791ndash795 2000
[6] M E Nita H Nagawa O Tominaga et al ldquop21Waf1Cip1 ex-pression is a prognostic marker in curatively resected eso-phageal squamous cell carcinoma but not p27Kip1 p53 or RbrdquoAnnals of Surgical Oncology vol 6 no 5 pp 481ndash488 1999
[7] P Maycotte and A Thorburn ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoCancer Biology andTherapy vol 11 no 2 pp 127ndash137 2011
[8] L Moretti E S Yang K W Kim and B Lu ldquoAutophagy sig-naling in cancer and its potential as novel target to improveanticancer therapyrdquoDrug ResistanceUpdates vol 10 no 4-5 pp135ndash143 2007
[9] N Chen and J Debnath ldquoAutophagy and tumorigenesisrdquo FEBSLetters vol 584 no 7 pp 1427ndash1435 2010
[10] L Yang Y Yu R Kang et al ldquoUp-regulated autophagy by en-dogenous highmobility group box-1 promotes chemoresistancein leukemia cellsrdquo Leukemia and Lymphoma vol 53 no 2 pp315ndash322 2012
[11] D J Klionsky and S D Emr ldquoAutophagy as a regulated pathwayof cellular degradationrdquo Science vol 290 no 5497 pp 1717ndash17212000
[12] D Glick S Barth and K F Macleod ldquoAutophagy cellular andmolecular mechanismsrdquo Journal of Pathology vol 221 no 1 pp3ndash12 2010
[13] Y Kondo T Kanzawa R Sawaya and S Kondo ldquoThe roleof autophagy in cancer development and response to therapyrdquoNature Reviews Cancer vol 5 no 9 pp 726ndash734 2005
[14] Y Kondo and S Kondo ldquoAutophagy and cancer therapyrdquoAutophagy vol 2 no 2 pp 85ndash90 2006
[15] C Mammucari G Milan V Romanello et al ldquoFoxO3 controlsautophagy in skeletal muscle in vivordquo Cell Metabolism vol 6no 6 pp 458ndash471 2007
[16] J Zhao J J Brault A Schild et al ldquoFoxO3 coordinately activatesprotein degradation by the autophagiclysosomal and proteaso-mal pathways in atrophying muscle cellsrdquo Cell Metabolism vol6 no 6 pp 472ndash483 2007
[17] J Zhou W Liao J Yang et al ldquoFOXO3 induces FOXO1-de-pendent autophagy by activating the AKT1 signaling pathwayrdquoAutophagy vol 8 pp 1712ndash1723 2012
[18] R Medzhitov P Preston-Hurlburt E Kopp et al ldquoMyD88 isan adaptor protein in the hTollIL-1 receptor family signalingpathwaysrdquoMolecular Cell vol 2 no 2 pp 253ndash258 1998
[19] E L Wang Z R Qian M Nakasono et al ldquoHigh expressionof Toll-like receptor 4myeloid differentiation factor 88 signalscorrelates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancerrdquo BritishJournal of Cancer vol 102 no 5 pp 908ndash915 2010
[20] J H Wang B J Manning Q D Wu S Blankson D Bouchier-Hayes and H P Redmond ldquoEndotoxinlipopolysaccharideactivates NF-120581b and enhances tumor cell adhesion and inva-sion through a 1205731 integrin-dependent mechanismrdquo Journal ofImmunology vol 170 no 2 pp 795ndash804 2003
[21] C-S Shi and J H Kehrl ldquoMyD88 and Trif target Beclin 1 totrigger autophagy in macrophagesrdquo Journal of Biological Chem-istry vol 283 no 48 pp 33175ndash33182 2008
[22] A Colell J-E Ricci S Tait et al ldquoGAPDH and autophagy pre-serve survival after apoptotic cytochrome c release in theabsence of caspase activationrdquo Cell vol 129 no 5 pp 983ndash9972007
[23] S Jin and E White ldquoRole of autophagy in cancer managementof metabolic stressrdquo Autophagy vol 3 no 1 pp 28ndash31 2007
[24] T R OrsquoDonovan G C OrsquoSullivan and S L McKenna ldquoInduc-tion of autophagy by drug-resistant esophageal cancer cellspromotes their survival and recovery following treatment withchemotherapeuticsrdquo Autophagy vol 7 no 5 pp 509ndash524 2011
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Parkinsonrsquos Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom
Submit your manuscripts athttpwwwhindawicom
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation httpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom Volume 2014
Parkinsonrsquos Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttpwwwhindawicom