research goals miocene mammal mapping miomap marc a. … · 2019. 2. 15. · designed around...

1
LOCALITY TABLE TID MN + AU MN Resage Table Relative Age Table Deposit Table Agent of Accumulation "Absolute" (Numerical) Age Table Reference Table BIBNUM Electronic Bibliography Bone Modification Faunal Comment Table Faunal Table Resfaun Table Restaxa Table Archival Research Data structure mimics the FAUNMAP project Project Overview We are building a GIS-linked database of Miocene mammal occurrences in the United States in order to test ideas about how physical environmental perturbations contribute to evolutionary and biogeographic change. The database and analyses are designed around Arc/Info. Species occurrences are linked to pertinent locality information and age criteria in a relational database. Published literature and well-identified museum collections provide the primary data. Produce interactive maps of geographic occurrences of mammal taxa through the Miocene, with an associated database of geographic and temporal information, all served on the internet. Build interfaces for using standard museum data in GIS analyses. Join forces with other data accumulation efforts. Database Goals Research Goals Contribute to evolutionary theory by clarifying the role of the physical environment as a motor of evolution. Examine the interplay between habitat fragmentation and faunal turnover rates to understand the effects of global change. Decipher the time scale at which environmental changes are most likely to affect mammalian faunas. Funded by Preliminary Results Species richness patterns will be compared across geographic regions and through time. This allows testing of hypotheses about the relative importance of tectonic and climatic changes in driving diversity patterns. These maps summarize the general collecting areas in which fossil-bearing localities are found. Most of the areas indicated by white dots contain multiple collecting localities. Numbers of specimens range from tens to thousands per locality. Species richness in the Rockies appears to increase coincident with the peak of the Miocene Climatic Optimum ~14-18.5 Ma (highlighted in yellow), based on data from the localities noted on the maps below. However, this may be due to sampling bias, such as the number of localities sampled (red line at right), the depositional environment, or the collecting methodology. For example, the low species richness levels in the Ar4 and He1 time periods are among the most poorly sampled intervals. Hemphillian (58 locs.) Hemingfordian (18 locs.) Tectonic Event (million-year scale) No Tectonic Event Sustained Climate Change (million-year scale) Miocene Rocky Mountains Miocene Great Basin Miocene Great Plains Cyclical Climate Change (thousand- year scale) Pleistocene Rocky Mountains Pleistocene Great Basin Pleistocene Great Plains Arikareean 1/2 (88 locs.) Barstovian (103 locs.) Arikareean 3/4 (24 locs.) Clarendonian (25 locs.) Northern Rocky Mountains 2.0 1.5 1.0 30 25 20 15 10 5 30 25 20 15 10 5 Atlantic δ 18 O Age HP2/3 HP1 CL2 CL1 BA3 BA2 BA1 HE2/3 HE1 AR4 AR3 AR2 AR1 O L I G O C E N E M I O C E N E 2 4 6 4 6 8 Modern Ice Free Temperature ο Celsius Age HP2/3 HP1 CL2 CL1 BA3 BA2 BA1 HE2/3 HE1 AR4 AR3 AR2 AR1 Ma Ma Species Richness/Number of Localities Localities Species Richness RICHNESS = Species / Interval Length 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Species Richness/Number of Localities ? ? ? Log NISP Estimated Species Richness 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 Number of Samples Ar2 (Peterson Creek) 16.8 Ar2 (M.U. Cabbage Patch) 17.7 Ar1 (L. Cabbage Patch) 23.5 Ba2 (Colter) 70.3 He2&3 (Split Rock) 94.9 Ba2 (Hepburn's Mesa) 149.7 Estimated Species Richness 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Ar2 (Peterson Creek) Ar2 (M.U. Cabbage Patch) Ar1 (L. Cabbage Patch) He2&3 (Split Rock) Ba2 (Hepburn's Mesa) Ba2 (Colter) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 Number of Samples Estimated Species Richness Hp1 (Bartlett Mt.) Ba2 (Red Basin) Cl2 (Black Butte) Ba1 (Devil’s Gate) Ba1 ( Mascall ) Ar2 (John Day) Hp3 (Arlington) Ba2 (Quartz Basin) Hp1 (Rattlesnake) Ar4 (Warm Springs) Bootstrap Comparisons 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 Number of Samples Hp1 (Bartlett Mt.) 31.4 Ba2 (Red Basin) 28 Cl2 (Black Butte) 23.57 Ba1 (Devil’s Gate) 51.2 Ba1 (Mascall) 19.7 Ar2 (John Day) 18.2 Hp3 (Arlington) 51.2 Ba2 (Quartz Basin) 56.1 Hp1 (Rattlesnake) 5.1 Ar4 (Warm Springs) 7.1 Estimated Species Richness Log NISP Estimated Species Richness 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.4 1 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4 Ba1 (Devil’s Gate) Hp1 (Bartlett Mt.) Ba2 (Red Basin) Cl2 (Black Butte) Ba2 (Quartz Basin) Ar2 (John Day) Hp3 (Arlington) Ba1 (Mascall) Hp1 (Rattlesnake) Ar4 (Warm Springs) Localities Species Richness Pacific Northwest Species richness in the Oregon/Washington region shows a similar pattern to that seen in the Rockies (low diveristy prior to the Miocene Climatic Optimum, peak richness during it). However, it appears that sampling bias (the number of localities sampled) and a lack of data during the key time intervals (He1 and He2) prevent an accurate interpretation of the data using this estimate of species richness. Alternative methodologies (lower right of poster) may be more appropriate. Methodology Northern Rocky Mountains Pacific Northwest Bootstrap comparisons of major collecting areas Left graphs (above and below): Apparent differences in richness result from a bias introduced by differing numbers of specimens per locality. Right graphs: As estimated from the log of the number of individual specimens (NISP), richness appears to decrease across the Miocene Climatic Optimum in the northern Rockies. Trends are less clear from the Pacific Northwest data, but most Ba1 and Ba2 localities exhibit lower richness than the Arikareean localities. MUSEUM of PALEONTOLOGY MUSEUM of MUSEUM of PALEONTOLOGY PALEONTOLOGY University of California at Berkeley University of California at Berkeley University of California at Berkeley and ANTHONY D. BARNOSKY MARC A. CARRASCO http://ib.berkeley.edu/labs/barnosky/ MIOMAP Miocene Mammal Mapping Project Table Table

Upload: others

Post on 27-Jan-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • LOCALITYTABLE

    TID

    MN+

    AUMN

    Resage Table

    Relative Age Table

    Deposit Table

    Agent ofAccumulation

    "Absolute"(Numerical) Age

    Table

    Reference Table

    BIBNUM

    ElectronicBibliography

    Bone Modification

    Faunal CommentTable

    Faunal Table

    Resfaun Table Restaxa Table

    Archival

    Research

    Data structure mimics the FAUNMAP project

    Project OverviewWe are building a GIS-linked database of Miocene mammal occurrences in the United States in order to test ideas about how physical environmental perturbations contribute to evolutionary and biogeographic change. The database and analyses are designed around Arc/Info. Species occurrences are linked to pertinent locality information and age criteria in a relational database. Published literature and well-identified museum collections provide the primary data.

    Produce interactive maps of geographic occurrences of mammal taxa through the Miocene, with an associated database of geographic and temporal information, all served on the internet.

    Build interfaces for using standard museum data in GIS analyses.

    Join forces with other data accumulation efforts.

    Database Goals

    Research GoalsContribute to evolutionary theory by clarifying

    the role of the physical environment as a motor of evolution.

    Examine the interplay between habitat fragmentation and faunal turnover rates to understand the effects of global change.

    Decipher the time scale at which environmental changes are most likely to affect mammalian faunas.

    Funded by

    Preliminary Results

    Species richness patterns will be compared across geographic regions and through time. This allows testing of hypotheses about the relative importance of tectonic and climatic changes in driving diversity patterns.

    These maps summarize the general collecting areas in which fossil-bearing localities are found. Most of the areas indicated by white dots contain multiple collecting localities. Numbers of specimens range from tens to thousands per locality.

    Species richness in the Rockies appears to increase coincident with the peak of the Miocene Climatic Optimum ~14-18.5 Ma (highlighted in yellow), based on data from the localities noted on the maps below. However, this may be due to sampling bias, such as the number of localities sampled (red line at right), the depositional environment, or the collecting methodology. For example, the low species richness levels in the Ar4 and He1 time periods are among the most poorly sampled intervals.

    Hemphillian (58 locs.)

    Hemingfordian(18 locs.)

    Tectonic Event(million-yearscale)

    No TectonicEvent

    SustainedClimateChange(million-yearscale)

    Miocene RockyMountains

    Miocene GreatBasin

    Miocene GreatPlains

    CyclicalClimateChange(thousand-year scale)

    Pleistocene RockyMountains

    Pleistocene GreatBasin

    PleistoceneGreat Plains

    Arikareean 1/2 (88 locs.)

    Barstovian (103 locs.)

    Arikareean 3/4 (24 locs.)

    Clarendonian (25 locs.)

    Northern Rocky Mountains2.0 1.5 1.0

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    Atlantic d18O Age

    HP2/3

    HP1

    CL2

    CL1

    BA3

    BA2

    BA1

    HE2/3

    HE1

    AR4

    AR3

    AR2

    AR1

    OLIGOCENE

    MIOCENE

    2 4 6

    4 6 8 Modern

    Ice Free

    Temperature o Celsius

    Age

    HP2/3

    HP1

    CL2

    CL1

    BA3

    BA2

    BA1

    HE2/3

    HE1

    AR4

    AR3

    AR2

    AR1

    Ma Ma

    Species Richness/Number of Localities

    Localities

    Species Richness

    50

    RICHNESS = Species / Interval Length

    50403020100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

    Species Richness/Number of Localities

    ?

    ?

    ?

    Log NISP

    Estim

    ated

    Spe

    cies

    Ric

    hnes

    s

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25

    Number of Samples

    Ar2 (Peterson Creek) 16.8

    Ar2 (M.U.

    Cabbage P

    atch) 17.7Ar1 (

    L. Cabbag

    e Patch)

    23.5

    Ba2

    (Col

    ter)

    70.3

    He2&3 (

    Split Ro

    ck) 94.9

    Ba2 (

    Hepb

    urn's

    Mesa

    ) 149

    .7

    Estim

    ated

    Spe

    cies

    Ric

    hnes

    s

    1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.50

    10

    2030

    40

    50

    60

    Ar2 (Pe

    terson

    Creek) Ar

    2 (M.

    U. Ca

    bbag

    e Patc

    h)

    Ar1 (

    L. Ca

    bbag

    e Patc

    h)

    He2&

    3 (Split

    Rock)

    Ba2 (

    Hepb

    urn's

    Mesa

    )

    Ba2 (C

    olter)

    0

    10

    2030

    40

    50

    60

    1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45

    Number of Samples

    Estimated Species

    Richness

    Hp1 (Bartlett Mt.)Ba2 (Red Basin)

    Cl2 (Black Butte)

    Ba1 (Devil’s Gate) Ba1 (Mascall

    )Ar2 (John Day)

    Hp3 (Arlington)

    Ba2 (Quartz Basin)

    Hp1 (Rattlesnake)

    Ar4 (Warm Springs)Bootstrap Comparisons

    0

    10

    2030

    40

    50

    60

    1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45Number of Samples

    Hp1 (

    Bartl

    ett M

    t.) 31

    .4

    Ba2 (

    Red B

    asin)

    28

    Cl2 (Black

    Butte) 23.5

    7

    Ba1 (

    Devil

    ’s Ga

    te) 5

    1.2

    Ba1 (Mascall) 1

    9.7Ar2 (

    John Day

    ) 18.2

    Hp3 (Arl

    ington)

    51.2Ba2

    (Quartz

    Basin) 5

    6.1

    Hp1 (Rattlesnake) 5.1

    Ar4 (Warm Springs) 7.1

    Estim

    ated

    Spe

    cies

    Ric

    hnes

    s

    Log NISP

    Estim

    ated

    Spe

    cies

    Ric

    hnes

    s

    0

    10

    20

    30

    4050

    60

    0.4 1 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4

    Ba1 (

    Devil

    ’s Ga

    te)Hp1 (Bartlett Mt.) Ba2

    (Red

    Bas

    in)

    Cl2 (

    Blac

    k But

    te)

    Ba2 (

    Quart

    z Bas

    in)

    Ar2 (

    John

    Day

    )

    Hp3 (A

    rlingto

    n)

    Ba1 (

    Masc

    all)

    Hp1 (R

    attles

    nake)

    Ar4 (Warm Springs)

    Localities

    Species Richness

    Pacific NorthwestSpecies richness in the Oregon/Washington region shows a similar pattern to that seen in the Rockies (low diveristy prior to the Miocene Climatic Optimum, peak richness during it). However, it appears that sampling bias (the number of localities sampled) and a lack of data during the key time intervals (He1 and He2) prevent an accurate interpretation of the data using this estimate of species richness. Alternative methodologies (lower right of poster) may be more appropriate.

    Methodology

    Northern Rocky Mountains

    Pacific Northwest

    Bootstrap comparisons of major collecting areasLeft graphs (above and below): Apparent differences in richness result from a bias introduced by differing numbers of specimens per locality. Right graphs: As estimated from the log of the number of individual specimens (NISP), richness appears to decrease across the Miocene Climatic Optimum in the northern Rockies. Trends are less clear from the Pacific Northwest data, but most Ba1 and Ba2 localities exhibit lower richness than the Arikareean localities.

    MUSEUM ofPALEONTOLOGY

    MUSEUM ofMUSEUM ofPALEONTOLOGYPALEONTOLOGY

    University of California at BerkeleyUniversity of California at BerkeleyUniversity of California at Berkeley

    and

    ANTHONY D. BARNOSKY MARC A. CARRASCO

    http://ib.berkeley.edu/labs/barnosky/

    MIOMAPMiocene Mammal Mapping Project

    Table

    Table