research methods in criminology 1.assignment # 1 2.research 3.research methods
TRANSCRIPT
Research Methods in Criminology
1.Assignment # 12.Research 3.Research methods
Why conduct research?
Some want to answer practical questions (“Will a reduction in average class size from 25 to 20 increase student writing skills?”)
Others want to make informed decision (“Should our school introduce extracurricular activities to reduce deviant behavior of students?”)
Still others want to change society (“What can be done to reduce rape?”)
Critics of scientific research in criminology view it as a detailed elaboration of what any person with common sense know
Sense and Nonsense about crime (Walker, 1989)
Females and the elderly fear crime because they are the most heavily victimized of all groups
Victims of crime seldom know their offenders
The typical criminal offender is either unemployed or on welfare
The larger the city, the greater the likelihood its residents will be victims of crime.
Rates of victimization are higher for males than females and for younger people
In a large proportion of violent crimes, victims know their offenders
Knowledge of imprisoned criminals indicates that most criminals have jobs and very few are welfare dependent
The residents of smaller cities have higher rates for certain crimes: assault, personal larceny, and residential burglary
Demographic characteristics (victims and offenders, 1976-2002)
Victims Offenders Population Victims Offenders
Under 14 4.7% .5% 20.6% 1.8 .2
14-17 5.1% 10.6% 6.1% 6.7 15.6
18-24 23.7% 36.2% 11.0% 14.5 29.7
25-34 29.0% 28.7% 16.0% 17.2 16.1
35-49 22.7% 17.2% 20.2% 9.0 7.7
50-64 9.3% 5.2% 13.9% 5.4 3.3
65+ 5.4% 1.7% 12.2% 3.5 1.3
Rate per 100,000 population
Demographic characteristics (victims and offenders, 1976-2002)
Victims Offenders Population Victims Offenders
Male 76.4% 88.6% 48.8% 12.7 16.4
Female 23.6% 11.4% 51.2% 3.7 2.0
White 51.1% 45.9% 84.0% 4.9 4.9
Black 46.8% 52.1% 12.2% 30.9 38.5
Other 2.1% 2.0% 3.8% 4.4 4.7
Rate per 100,000 population
Sense and Nonsense about crime (Walker, 1989)
Females and the elderly fear crime because they are the most heavily victimized of all groups
Victims of crime seldom know their offenders
The typical criminal offender is either unemployed or on welfare
The larger the city, the greater the likelihood its residents will be victims of crime.
Rates of victimization are higher for males than females and for younger people
In a large proportion of violent crimes, victims know their offenders
Knowledge of imprisoned criminals indicates that most criminals have jobs and very few are welfare dependent
The residents of smaller cities have higher rates for certain crimes: assault, personal larceny, and residential burglary
The Victim-Offender Relationship Three types of relationships are often identified:A. Familial (especially spouses and siblings)B. Acquaintances (including friends, girlfriends,
boyfriends, neighbors, and coworkers)C. Strangers
UCR data The majority of homicides known to police
involve acquaintances (57%) Relatives (22%) Strangers (21%)
Homicides committed by women Female-perpetrated homicides account for 10-
12% of the overall homicides Who do women kill? The answer is those closest to them, with whom
they live (intimate partners, or ex-partners and family members)
Over the period 1995-2001, intimate partners accounted for 32% of female-perpetrated homicides
Offender characteristics Typical intimate partner killer is one aged
b/w 25 and 40, with below-average level of educational attainment, who is likely to unemployed and from lower-class background (Mann, 1996, Goetting, 1987)
Method of killing Women usually kill their partner with a
knife or sharp instrument (78%) Poisoning (6.2%) Blunt instrument (2.6%) Arson (2.2%) Shooting (2.0%)
Weapon use in Murder A firearm (handgun) is used in about two-thirds of
all homicides (predominantly males) Knives or other cutting instruments
(predominantly females) Personal weapons (hands, fists, and feet) Blunt objects Strangulation Contrary to media images, poison and explosives
are rarely used as murder weapons
Sense and Nonsense about crime (Walker, 1989)
Females and the elderly fear crime because they are the most heavily victimized of all groups
Victims of crime seldom know their offenders
The typical criminal offender is either unemployed or on welfare
The larger the city, the greater the likelihood its residents will be victims of crime.
Rates of victimization are higher for males than females and for younger people
In a large proportion of violent crimes, victims know their offenders
Knowledge of imprisoned criminals indicates that most criminals have jobs and very few are welfare dependent
The residents of smaller cities have higher rates for certain crimes: assault, personal larceny, and residential burglary
Homicide rates
The proportion of intimate homicides differs by type of area
Intimate homicides (spouses, ex-spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends) made up a larger percentage of murders in rural areas than in suburban or urban areas
Research as an attack on common sense
Hirshi and Stark (1969) in “Hellfire and Delinquency” have found a weak relationship b/w church attendance and nondeliquency
“damned if you do and damned if you don’t” Study was attacked as false, stupid, or an
illustration of inadequate methods Had they found a strong relationship, they would
have been accused of wasting time on the common sense knowledge
Research as the use of standardized systematic procedures in the search of knowledge Pure research for the sake of scientific
knowledge Construction of theories
of models that allow for a better understanding of criminal behavior
No immediate direct relevance
Applied research Practical goal in mind Development of
strategies intended to address the problem of crime
Purposes of Research Exploration, Description, and Explanation
(Earl Babbie, 1999) Exploration provides beginning familiarity
with a topic A. To satisfy the researcher’s curiosity B. To test the feasibility of undertaking a
more extensive studyC. To develop the methods to be employed
in any subsequent study
Description Describe situation or events U.S. Census, UCR Computation of crime rates for different
cities Many qualitative studies aim primarily at
description
Explanation Explain things Reporting why some cities have higher
crime rates than others involve explanation
Quantitative and Qualitative
Hypothesis Data are in the form of
numbers from precise measurement
Theory is largely causal and deductive
Replication is possible Analysis proceeds by
using statistics, tables, or charts
No hypothesis Data are in the form of words
and images from documents, observations, and transcripts
Theory noncausal and inductive
Replication is rare Analysis proceeds by
extracting themes or generalizations (although numbers are possible)
Quantitative and Qualitative Two logical systems Deductive logic-(hypothesis,
observations, empirical generalizations, theory)
Inductive logic (observations, empirical generalizations, theory)
A model of the Research Process
THEORY
HYPOTHESISFINDINGS
DATA GATHERING
RESEARCH DESIGN
Deduction
Operationalization
Measurement
Induction
Analysis
Qualitative Research on Diversity Educational system Manners and everyday interactions Friendship and social activity
Manners and everyday interactions “Americans ask routinely ”How are you doing”
but they are not interested in how I am doing” “American smile” has a different meaning than
smile in my culture. Here it is a polite greeting, nothing more…”
“I feel that people who smile at me are insincere because their smile appears suddenly and then disappears also suddenly”
Manners and everyday interactions “Americans are obsessed with cleaning of their
bodies, but they routinely put their feet on a chair or even small coffee table….this does not go along with hygiene”
“All my Americans friends do not take off their shoes at home. It seems to me that they can bring a lot of bacteria and viruses into their homes”
Friendship and social activity “If I cook my real national food, no one from my
department will try it…I need to Americanize my native food to make it attractive to my American class-mates”.
“It is to difficult for us to make American friends. Although, Americans are talkative and friendly, they are not opened to new relationships”
“Usually it takes much more time to establish a friendship with Americans than with people of my own culture”
Research Methods in Criminology Experiments Survey research Field research Content analysis Existing data research Comparative research Evaluation research
Classic Experiment At least two groups (control and experimental) Randomly assign people to groups Treat the experimental group by manipulation the
independent variable Observe the effect of the treatment on the
dependent variable in the experimental group Compare the dependent variable differences in the
experimental and control groups Control is crucial (to eliminate alternative
explanations)
Experimental research Researchers use deception to control what the
subjects believe is occurring Researchers intentionally mislead subjects
through verbal or written instructions It may involve the use of confederates or stooges
–people who pretend to be subjects but who actually work for the researcher
For realistic deception, researchers may invent false treatment and dependent variables to keep subjects unaware of true ones (ethical issues)
Laud Humphrey’s “Tearoom Trade” (1970)
Study of impersonal sexual activity between male homosexuals
“Where the average guy go just to get a blow job” and “Who are they”
Observational research (how men approach each other and how they negotiate sex)
License plate numbers Health care research
Laud Humphrey’s “Tearoom Trade” (1970) Middle class High educational level Mostly married with children Only one nonconventional thing about
them-”tearoom” for anonymous sex Great scandal (police could demand the
names of the subjects)
The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment (1983) Goal was to find the most effective strategy Three groups: two with different treatment and
control Police officers volunteering to take whatever
action was dictated by a random system: instruction in an envelope
Three different instructions: (1) arrest the suspect; (2) separate or remove the suspect from the scene for 8 hours; (3) advise and mediate
Experimental group I
Arrest O1 X1 O2 19%
Experimental group II
SeparateO1 X2 O2 33%
Control group
Mediate O1 O2 37%
Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment
1. Victims have been interviewed every two weeks for the next 6 months, police records have been monitored as well
2. Most influential policy experiment
3. Arrest works more effectively in deterring domestic violence
Experiments in Criminology Not always possible (ethical issues) Long-term study Quasi-experiments or natural experiments Example: Effect of the decision to conduct
crackdown on drinking and driving by a local police force (planned interventions)
Occasionally, natural events (catastrophe or tornadoes) might substitute planned interventions
Strengths Weaknesses
the only method that allows us to test the causal relationships between variables
Random assignment of subjects to experimental and control groups allows us to test our hypotheses
In real life, only rarely one variable actually a cause of another one
Difficult to test very complex hypotheses (difficult to manipulate and control more than one or two variables)
Ethical issues
Survey Research Survey is a series of questions asked of a
number of people and designed to measure the attitudes, beliefs, values, and personality traits
Based on sampling
Different research designsCross Sectional
Design
1990
41-50
51-60
61-70
71-80
Cohort Study1990 200041-50 41-5051-60 51-6061-70 61-7071-80 71-80
Trend Study1990 200041-50 41-5051-60 51-6061-70 61-7071-80 71-80
Panel Study1990 200041-50* 41-5051-60* 51-60*
61-70* 61-70*
71-80* 71-80*
+81*
Denotes comparison
* Denotes same individuals
Observation Observation is a research technique in
which a researcher directly observe the behavior of individuals in their usual social environments
Observational research is often called field research
Different strategies Complete Participant –researcher goes
“undercover” and does not tell people being observed that he/she is doing research
Complete Observer –researcher views things from a distance or one-way mirror
Participant Observer – people know that they are observed
Strengths Weaknesses
Observation of behavior in natural context
Get information about those individuals who cannot fill out survey or respond orally (children)
Relatively small groups can be observed at once
Labor-intensive Can be subjective Hawthorne effect
(participation in research can influence subjects)
Life history and case studies In-depth analysis of one or a few cases Qualitative research Sutherland’s “The Professional Thief”
(1937) Shaw's “The Jack-Roller” (1930)
Unobtrusive Research
Unobtrusive methods are strategies for studying people’s behavior in ways that do not have an impact on the subjects
Homicide rate
Unobtrusive methods Artifacts (archeologists use) Use of existing statistics Content analysis
Strengths Weaknesses We do not need
cooperation of people being studied
Research does not affect the behavior of people being studied
Study social things only after they have occurred and left traces
These traces must solid enough to last until can be observed
If we use secondary data we do not have control over the quality of these data
Triangulation
Every method has both strengths and weaknesses
Whenever possible researchers use more than one method to obtain data
Triangulation – methods are combined so that the strengths of one method overcome the weakness of another method
Example of Triangulation
Suppose you study the impact of neighborhood problems on youth development
Census information (unobtrusive) about poverty level in neighborhoods
Survey among youth and parents Observations