research program of a super fast reactor
TRANSCRIPT
Research Program of a Super Fast Reactor
Yoshiaki OKA1), Yuki ISHIWATARI1), Jie LIU1), Takayuki TERAI1), Shinya NAGASAKI1), Yusa MUROYA1), Hiroaki ABE1), Hideo MORI2), Masato AKIBA3), Hajime AKIMOTO3), Keisuke OKUMURA3), Naoaki AKASAKA3),
and Shoji GOTO4)
1) Dep. Nuclear Engineering and Management/Nuclear Professional School, University of Tokyo
2) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyushu University3) Japan Atomic Energy Agency4) Tokyo Electric Power Company
1
Revised from the presentation at ICAPP’06, June 7, 2006, RenoPresent study is the result of “Research and Development of the Super Fast Reactor” entrusted to The University of Tokyo by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT).
Outline
• Background and purpose
• Overview of the program
‒ Development of the Super FR concept
‒ Heat transfer and thermal-hydraulic experiments
‒ Material developments
• Summary
2
Generation IV Reactor Concepts
SCWR(Super FR / Super LWR)
SFR LFR
VHTR GFR MSR3
Features of Super FR / Super LWR• Simple & compact plant systems‒ No water/steam separation
‒ Low flow rate, high enthalpy coolant
• High temperature & thermal efficiency (500C, ~44%)
• Utilizations of current LWR and Supercritical FPP technologies‒ Major components are used within the temperature range of past experiences
Supercritical FPP(once-through boiler)
Super FR/ Super LWRBWR PWR
Recent Progress for Super LWR
• Concept of once-through direct cycle thermal reactor system with supercritical water has been established
• Excellent safety characteristics have been shown
‒ Effective core cooling by depressurization
‒ Mild behaviors during abnormal transients
‒ Excellent ATWS characteristics
• Major R&D subjects are revealed quantitatively
5
Background and Purpose
1. Innovations of FR, cost reduction over thermal reactor2. Management and disposal of spent fuel3. Contributions to energy security and environment protections
• Compatible with tight fuel lattice without stability or pumping power issues• Higher power density than thermal reactor (Super LWR) due to no moderator necessary for FR⇒ Cost reduction
Cost: Super FR < Super LWR < LWR
• To pursue the potential of Super FR by developing the concept and conducting R&D of TH and materials
Subjects
Features of Super FR
Purpose
6
Outline of the Research Program
① Development of the Super FR concept
② Heat transfer and thermal-hydraulic experiments
③ Material development
• Research program of Super FR was entrusted by MEXT as one of the Japanese NERI in Dec, 2005. Research period will be until March 2010.
7
Development of the Super FR concept • Purpose: To establish Super fast reactor concept
• Design goals‒ Not breeding, but high power core using Pu from spent LWR fuel
‒ High thermal efficiency (High core outlet temperature)
‒ Negative void reactivity
‒ Good plant controllability and safety characteristics
‒ Simple plant systemContents① Fuel and core designs and structural considerations at the high temperature
② Method developments for evaluating nuclear transmutation ability
③ Backend risk analyses④ Preparation of a 3-D CFD code⑤ Reactor characteristics (control, safety) 8
Fuel and Core Designs
Seed FA
Fuel rodCR guide tube
Blanket FA
ZrH2 layer
1/6 Core (example*)
• MOX fuel with SS cladding (Fuel rod analysis)• Core design: 3-D core calculation, subchannel analysis• Development and verification of 3-D CFD analysis code (replacement for large scale experiments)
• Environmental impact analysis by coupling transmutation and backend analyses
9* Cao, L., Oka, Y., Ishiwatari, Y., et al., JNST, 452,(2008),138
Core Structure and Plant Control and SafetyCR guide tube
CR guide tube
Seed
Blanket
InletOutlet
Upper dome
Lower plenum
RPV and the coolant flow
• Large temperature change‒ In-core and RPV structural deigns
• High power density, tight fuel lattice• Control and Safety‒ Control system designs, safety system designs‒ Abnormal transient and accident analyses‒ Applicability of MPS method for condensation phenomenon of supercritical fluids
10
HT Correlation for Determining Design Limit• High accuracy is required for predicting max. clad T
⇒ fuel integrity and core outlet temperature• Currently available:‒ heat transfers in smooth circular tubes‒ Large uncertainties (Differences in MCST predictions~44℃)
• Required correlations for design:‒ Fuel bundle geometry including grid spacers‒ Improved accuracy in the high temperature region‒ Upward flow / downward flow
℃ BOC MOC EOC
Watts 637 638 647
Oka-Koshizuka 604 606 603
Bishop 627 629 635
Dittus- Boelter 617 618 616250 300 350 400 450 500 550
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000Hydraulic diameter: 4.17mm
mass flux: 937.9 kg/m2/s
heat flux: 562 kW/m2
Heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)
Bulk temperature (℃)
Watts Dittus-Boelter Bishop Oka-Koshizuka
High T region
MCST (Max. clad surface temperature) predictions by different HT correlations
Requirements for exp.and materials
Core Design (Super LWR)
Radial・axialflux factor
Local flux factor
EngineeringUncertainties
Nominal steady state Core average condition(Design target)
Nominal peak steady state condition
Max. peak steady stateCondition (thermal limit)
Statistical thermal design
LIMIT for designtransients
AbnormalTransients
Plant Safety analyses
MarginFailure LIMIT
3-D core calculations
Fuel rod analyses
MCST:740℃
Subchannel analyses
ΔT1=150℃
ΔT2=58℃
ΔT3=32℃
ΔT4=50℃
MCST:850℃
Ave. outlet:500℃
Startup (Super LWR)
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Inlet flow rate
Core power
Inlet temperature
Average outlet temperature
MCST
Temperature [℃]
Pressure [MPa]
Ratio (%)
BT
• Sliding pressure startup system (nuclear heating starts at subcritical pressure)
• Clad temperature increase in pressurization phase is due to BT• Power / flow region is limited by CHF• CHF may be increased by grid spacers
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 240
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Operable region during pressurization phase
Flow rate = 35%
Inlet temperature = 280oC
Max. allowable power Min. required power
Power [%]
Pressure [MPa]
13
Heat Transfer and Thermal-Hydraulic Experiments
• To develop basic heat transfer and thermal-hydraulic database (correlations) for design
‒ Effects of fuel bundle geometry and grid spacers on heat transfer
‒ Heat transfers in both steady state and transient conditions (supercritical pressure)
‒ CHF and effects of grid spacers on CHF during startup conditions (subcritical pressure)
‒ Critical flow (in case of LOCA) and condensation (to suppression pool) characteristics
Objective
14
Contents of the Experiments• Single tube test
‒ Obtain basic data
‒ Development of heat transfer correlation
• Fuel bundle test
‒ Effects of grid spacers
‒ Steady state and transient tests
‒ Flow directions upward / downward
• CHF test (subcritical pressure)
‒ Obtain CHF data near the critical pressure
‒ Development of HT correlation
• Critical flow and condensation tests
‒ Obtain basic data for supercritical fluids
Single tube
ID:4.4mm
Seven-rod bundle
Heater pin (OD:8mm)×7 pins
Pressure vessel
15
Kyushu University Test Loop(before Remodeling)
Pre-heaterTest loopTest section
Circulationpump
• Surrogate fluid: HCFC22‒ Critical pressure: 5 MPa‒ Critical temperature: 96 ℃
• Test conditions‒ Pressure: max. 5.5 MPa‒ Temperature: max. 160 ℃‒ Mass flux: max. 0.15kg/s
16
JAEA Test loop
Overview of the system
3.5m
4m
• Working fluid: Supercritical water• Test conditions‒ Pressure: max. 25 MPa‒ Temperature: max. 400 ℃ (to be upgraded to 500 ℃)‒ Max. circulation mass flux: 1.3kg/sec
Circulation pump
Pump head: 70m (400℃)
17
Materials R&D
• Development of fuel cladding material• Development of thermal insulator• Development of methodology for measuring dissolution of radioactive materials and corrosion products
Blanket FA
Seed FA
Contents
Long lived fuel rod(Development of cladding)
Maintaining coolant temperatureReduction of thermal stress
(Development of thermal insulator)
ZrH layer (For achieving negative void reactivity) 18
0 10 20 30 40 50 60-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Primary membrane stress [MPa]
Fuel rod ave. burnup [GWd/t]
Segment no. 8 Segment no. 9 Segment no. 10
Time to rupture [h]Creep rupture strength [MPa]
750℃
700℃
650℃
600℃
10
102
103
10 102 103 104 105
600℃650℃700℃750℃
PNC1520 PNC316
Need for Developing High Creep Strength Clad• Max. stress on clad at peak T (700-750℃): 70-100MPa
‒ Exceed creep strength of SS for LWR (SUS316L)
‒ Advanced SS for LMFBR (PNC1520) almost satisfies the requirement but SCC susceptibility, corrosion and neutron absorption properties need to be improved
• High creep strength clad needs to be developed for Super FR
Creep rupture strength of advanced SS
Fuel rod analysis results (Super LWR)
700-750℃
Development of Cladding Material
• Primary optimized test material
‒ To be developed based on PNC1520 experience
‒ Irradiation test by HIT of the Univ. of Tokyo
‒ Further equipments will be developed as required to test corrosion & irradiation effects
HIT (High Fluence Irradiation Facility, Univ. of Tokyo) 20
Development of Thermal Insulator• Large ΔT (~250℃) at the temperature boundary
• Thermal insulator is required for:‒ reduction of thermal stress
‒ maintaining moderator temperature
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
100
200
300
400
500
σ>Su
(1/2×Su)<σ<Su
σ<(1/2×Su)
Mid wall temperature [℃]
ΔT (℃)
Thermal stress on the wall
No thermal insulation
Thermally insulated
Max. thermal stress• Low heat conductivity
• Low neutron absorption
• Good thermal shock resistance
• Good dimensional stability
RequirementsInsulated No insulation
Stainless steel
HotCold
T HotCold
T
• Survey and tests of candidate materials (e.g., ZrO2)
Su: tensile strength
Summary
• Japanese research program has been launched to clarify the concept of the once-through direct cycle supercritical-pressure light water cooled fast reactor (Super FR) including the fuel and core designs
• The followings will be achieved‒ Development of the Super FR concept
‒ Establishment of the basic thermal-hydraulic database by experiments
‒ Development of the main in-core materials
22