research proposal - learning rounds
DESCRIPTION
Catriona's Research proposal for Learning RoundsTRANSCRIPT
the research problem
Research Proposal X7826 [PR960]
The Scottish Experience of Learning Rounds.
•
Understanding the means by which Learning Rounds as a collaborative
activity can influence teacher professional learning.
The system of classroom observation known as Learning Rounds is a form of
collaborative continuous professional development (CPD) which is gaining
popularity in schools in Scotland. The system emerged after a visit by Richard
Elmore to Scotland as part of the Government – funded Thought-Leaders’
Programme, 2005-2008 during which he described the process of CPD for
teachers through professional learning networks, known as instructional rounds
networks in the US. This process was honed and adapted, and through the
leadership and facilitation of the National CPD team, with the support of the
Scottish Government, it evolved into Learning Rounds in Scotland.
As the Learning Rounds Toolkit ( 2010) explains:
Learning Rounds is a new kind of collaborative professional learning. It
involves teams of staff observing and learning about and from teaching
practice across the school. Observers create a base of evidence describing
the research problem
what they have seen. There are no evaluative comments or value-laden
points. The team then discusses how they, their school or authority will use
the data to bring about improvement for learners.
This evidence-based process leads to a continuous development of practice
at personal, school and authority level. Staff learn together and both those
observed and those observing develop and deepen their understanding of
how to improve learning. The process creates descriptive evidence that can
generate effective change across a school or authority.
Although certain conditions must be in place and protocols followed in
Learning Rounds, the process is essentially a straightforward one, and the
claims made by it are bold. Through this process it is claimed that collegial
practice will develop and that Learning Rounds…”can deliver high quality,
sustainable improvements in the learning experiences of pupils in a range of
contexts.” (Learning Rounds Toolkit 2010).
This study will aim to investigate these claims and evaluate the ways in which
Learning Rounds influence and impact upon teachers’ professional learning.
the research problem
The Policy Context
An increasingly sharper focus on teachers’ continuous professional development
(CPD) activities has come about over recent years, especially since The McCrone
Agreement; A Teaching Profession for the 21st Century (TP21). The TP21 agreement
may well be mostly associated with a significant salary increase along with a
simplified career and salary structure, and formalisation of entitlement to non-class
contact time across all sectors. However, one strand of the McCrone Agreement
(Scottish Executive Education Department, 2001) also addressed issues under the
heading ‘professional development’. This included the recognition of CPD as a
professional entitlement, with 35 hours of CPD per annum built into teachers’
contracts, and the expectation that every teacher would maintain a professional
development portfolio (Fraser, et al., 2007). The notion of CPD as an entitlement,
and part of the teachers’ contractual obligation was a new concept, and heralded a
new era whereby unlike in previous times, where CPD did not feature as part of the
contractual arrangements of teaching, the entitlement to, or reponsibility for CPD,
became part of the teachers’ role. Since the introduction of this CPD entitlement,
there is anecodotal evidence to suggest a move away from a limited
understanding of CPD as set pieces (Donaldson 2011) or limited to courses
teachers attend, towards a deeper understanding of enhanced professionalism.
There is still a continued need, however, to encourage deeper understanding of
complexities of CPD amongst the profession, the range of opportunities which can
the research problem
be defined by this term, and the impact of CPD activities on the learning
experiences of students.
Presently, in 2011 these arrangements are due to be re-examined under the Review
of Teacher Employment in Scotland Committee, led by Professor Gerry McCormac.
Its call for evidence suggests that ideas and understandings of professionalism and
CPD, the value of the 35 hour entitlement, as well as more administrative concerns
will be scrutinised as part of this review.
Alongside this, the entirety of teacher education in Scotland has recently been
reviewed and reported on in the form of the Teaching Scotland’s Future report,
authored by Graham Donaldson (2011), formerly of HMIE. This report looked
extensively at the continuum of teacher education, including both pre-service and
in-service stages And with an eye on building capacity among teachers and
improving the learning of the young people of Scotland (Donaldson; 2011), a wide-
ranging set of 50 recommendations has been offered, most of which are
underpinned by the theme of career-long teacher capacity building. Interestingly, all
of the reports’ recommendations have been accepted by the Scottish Government,
in whole, in part or in principle. Specific reference to Learning Rounds in the
context of “hub schools” (Donaldson: 2011, pg112) as sites of partnership
collaborations involving teachers, researchers, teacher educators and students,
suggests that the Learning Rounds model has potential to influence the thinking
around possible implementation of some of these recommendations.
the research problem
Additionally, Learning Rounds in the context of Donaldson’s recommendation 33,
which states that CPD activities should be shifting from set-piece events to more
local, team based approaches, which centre around self evaluation and professional
collaboration (Donaldson, 2011), appear to assume a certain significance. When
pitched alongside ever-tightening financial constraints which are presently throttling
school expenditure on CPD, a practice such as this could neatly be seen to fufill a
development need for teachers, whilst also responding to current policy imperatives,
as above. The issues to be explored in the course of this study intend to shed
some light on what the value of these activities would be in terms of teacher
professional development, and the convergence of these reports provides a timely
backdrop for this or any examination of teacher CPD or professional learning
experience currently taking place.
Key Issues and the research problem
A closer examination of collaborative CPD; what the literature says; practitioner
understanding of collaborative CPD and the conditions necessary for it to occur.
In recent years, it would appear that the term collaborative practice has become
part of the everyday lexicon of educators in Scotland, and possibly beyond. In
addition, professional learning communities or practitioner networks are becoming
the research problem
increasingly common across the teaching profession to the extent that …you can’t
turn around in a school ….. with any kind of improvement agenda without bumping
into some kind of network. Some are effective, but some are merely repackaged
dysfunctional meetings which fail because they are disconnected from instructional
improvement (City et al, 2009).
This raises questions of the quality and effectiveness of such practice, and also,
what actually happens inside these communities? Under the rubric of managing
change and teacher capacity, Fullan (2007) makes an argument for learning
communities advancing and supporting the process of personal development in a
social context, and pitches this development against the opposing concept of
isolationism. This is not an unqualified argument, however. While explaining how the
process of creating and nurturing purposeful learning communities is capable of a
reculturing of the profession (Fullan, 2007), Fullan also draws on McLaughlin &
Talbert, 2001 (in Fullan, 2007) and highlights the dangers of collaborative activities
and communities which reinforce bad or ineffective practice. This is an issue that
needs to be considered in relation to Learning Rounds.
Referring to what teachers actually achieve or do as a result of participation in
groups such as these has been described as being locked inside a “black box”
(Little, in Nelson and Slavit; 2007). A detailed analysis of the dynamics at work
inside professional learning communities was undertaken by Nelson and Slavit
(2007). The actual study examined five PLCs working through a collaborative inquiry
the research problem
process which, similar to Learning Rounds, has the focus on teachers and their
learning as the agents of change, and the process itself as the innovation rather
than an end to be achieved. Their conclusions resonate with much of what is
claimed by Learning Rounds, while also highlighting some potential challenges this
model faces. Through observing the process of participation in these communities
of inquiry, the authors identified values-based trusting and respectful professional
relationships as crucial to progress, and saw that…..
most of these teachers had little experience with looking closely at student work
or other forms of classroom data…. We saw them struggle to make explicit their
tacit beliefs about teaching and learning; to co-construct a vision for high-quality
mathematics or science teaching, to recognize gaps between the vision and the
reality of any given classroom and to critically examine the impacts on student
learning (Nelson and Slavit, p37, 2007).
Although this suggests that aspects of Learning Rounds do seem to correspond to
the theoretical framework established in this study, it also raises issues around
necessary underlying conditions and challenges encountered in collaborative CPD.
In more recent studies (such as Kennedy, 2011) the characteristics of collaborative
and individual forms of CPD have been investigated and analysed through a series
of theoretical lenses and frameworks which cast an interesting light on the subject.
Kennedy (2011) found collaborative CPD was shown to have much more impact on
the research problem
teaching and learning than individualised forms of CPD, and was also shown to
encourage teacher commitment and ownership of CPD. This study highlights a need
for a common understanding of collaborative CPD which takes into account its role,
purpose, value and shape (Kennedy 2011), but that the formal/informal dichotomy
also has an influence on teacher understanding and opinions of CPD.
Kennedy (2011) also points out that even with teacher understanding of these
issues, and with enabling factors in place, there is a systemic bias towards
individualised, more formal types of CPD which is underpinned by both policy and
standard-based frameworks, and which is at odds with the current vogue-ish
emphasis on collaborative practice, as mentioned above. This frames the Learning
Rounds model in an interesting, and possibly unique space: here is a practice which
does respond to elements of current policy imperatives, and which is both formal
(i.e systematic and planned; can possibly be linked to school improvement) and
collaborative. Does this model then which as demonstrated, relates to the broad
literature on the subject of collaborative practice in CPD, offer us a valid, theory –
based and workable way forward within this domain?
Key questions
In order to address this problem, this study will seek to answer questions relating
to the strategic issue of understanding the means by which Learning Rounds as
a collaborative activity can influence teacher professional learning. The key
the research problem
questions to be addressed will draw on the existing literature, documentation
and practitioner testimony.
1.What is the nature of collaborative CPD?
This key question will serve to attempt to arrive at an understanding of how
practitioners relate to and understand the nature of collaborative CPD. There is
also a need to examine what exactly the benefits of collaborative CPD are, and
understand if these benefits relate only to teachers as individuals or are there
collective benefits to be derived? If so what might they be and how are they
evidenced? And crucially, it will be necessary to understand they ways in which
any benefits evidenced relate to teacher practice.
Barriers to collaborative CPD and also to the implementation of Learning Rounds
will need to be examined, as will the nature, interaction and overlap between
Learning Rounds, collaborative CPD and any reported benefits to practitioner
professional learning.
2. What are Learning Rounds and how have they been understood and implemented?
A worm’s eye view of what Learning Rounds actually are, what they look like in
practice and how they have been understood and implemented by practitioners
in schools will be necessary to frame the study. An analysis of the resources
and processes involved in Learning Rounds and how they relate to existing,
the research problem
relevant research will underpin this. Any pre-requisite underlying conditions will
be identified and explained and the study will seek to locate the practice within
the current policy context. Potential barriers to implementation and inhibiting
factors will also be explored.
3. What outcomes would serve as indicators of success in Learning Rounds?
If the question as to whether Learning Rounds offer a valid, workable model of
collaborative CPD is to be posed, some further questions on the model’s perceived
value in practice must also be asked. The factors which enable and inhibit
successful learning rounds in theory and in practice will be examined as will the
exact nature of participants’ professional learning that may take place. The value
attributed to their learning as related to the process will also be examined and
empirical evidence related to these themes will be gathered. As a CPD activity, an
appraisal of the impact on student learning as an ultimate success indicator will
also be required.
Research methodology
Learning Rounds is a bounded system which is school- based and a specific,
complex, functioning thing (Stake, 1995).These characteristics invite an emphasis on
holistic treatment of phenomena (Stake, 1995) which is an appropriate approach to
a research problem such as this. Learning Rounds therefore lend themselves neatly
the research problem
to case-study research, and the problem posed invited a detailed analysis of a
complex, bounded and functioning system. This study will work within a qualitative
design, with an inductive orientation as a multiple intrinsic case study.
Multiple sites of research into Learning Rounds have been identified. One is a local
authority who could be seen as early adopters of the model, and another is a local
authority which is new to the practice but is keen to try it out. A multiple case
study approach will give a broader view of the process from both inexperienced and
veteran perspectives. Within each of these authorities one school will be identified
where the research will take place. Local authority co-ordinating staff will be
regarded as key informants in this process and will be interviewed. Participants at
school level will be identified on a voluntary - sampling basis. The number of
practitioners typically taking part in a Learning Round is 6. This number includes
the facilitator. It is envisaged that within each site of research, a maximum of two
examples of the process in action will be analysed.
The methods used to gather evidence in this study will be mixed and will include:
1. Observations of Learning Rounds in practice. Non–participative observations
will be carried out in order to address question 2 above. Key elements of
the Learning Rounds process lend themselves to observations, namely the
initial planning discussion prior to the Learning Round observation, and the
post- (Learning Round) observation discussion. The research observations will
the research problem
be recorded and transcribed where appropriate. Emerging themes will be
coded and collated for further analysis.
2. Semi- structured interviews. Interviews will be carried out with key informants
i.e local authority staff, school-based learning round facilitators, and key
members of the national CPD team. A sample of the estimated 24
participating school-based practitioners will also be interviewed. A small
sample of learners in the non - experienced local authority school will also
be interviewed to seek their views on any impact Learning Rounds may have
had on their learning experience. The interviews will be carried out on a one
to one basis and will be semi-structured in order to allow for the
emergence of themes or ideas which may not have been anticipated. The
interviews will seek to drill into practitioner understandings of the nature of
collaborative CPD and provide the data to address the issues raised in
question one. The interviews will again be recorded and transcribed. A
thematic analysis of the interviews will be carried out.
3. Relevant document analysis. Any evaluative reports which have been written
and key documentation such as “The Learning Rounds Toolkit” will be
critically analysed. Evaluative reports will relate only to the participating local
authority which has had previous experience of Learning Rounds.
the research problem
Potential limitations
There are some considerable limitations to this study. Learning Rounds operate
on a system of voluntary participation, and this may have some influence on
participants disposition towards the process, since as volunteers they will be
more likely to have a positive disposition rather than a negative one, which
could create bias. As a practitioner working in the domain of CPD I must also
take account of my own epistemological perspective which will inevitably have
some sort of bearing on what is produced. The proximity of the study to my
area of work is also something to be considered as an influencing factor. Lastly,
my own relative inexperience as a researcher means that I do not have a full
understanding of the scale or the scope of the task ahead, which could also
have implications for the study.
Dissemination
These findings will form the basis of a report which will be made publically
available via the National CPD team or its successor. It is hoped that the report
will be useful to practitioners interested in engaging with the Learning Rounds
process. It will be shared in the national Learning Rounds online community on
Glow, the national intranet for education in Scotland. As a collegiately active
online practitioner, I will also publish the report on my personal blog. Local
the research problem
authorities, schools and participating practitioners and learners will be
anonymised in the report.
Bibliography
City, Elizabeth A, Elmore, Richard F, Fiarman, Sarah E and Teitel, Lee. (2009).
Instructional Rounds in Education: A Network Approach to Improving Teaching
and Learning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Donaldson, G. (2011). Teaching Scotland's Future: A Review of Teacher Education in
Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.
Fraser, Christine , Kennedy, Aileen , Reid, Lesley and Mckinney, Stephen(2007).
Teachers' continuing professional development: contested concepts,
understandings and models. Professional Development in Education, 153-169.
Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers'
College Press.
Loraine Blaxter, Christina Hughes, Malcolm Tight. (2010). How to Research Forth
Edition. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
National CPD Team. (2010). Learning Rounds Toolkit. Retrieved January 9/01/11,
2011, from National CPD Team Blog:
http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/cpdfind/searchcpd/oppdetails.asp?inst=5349
Nelson, Tamara Holmlund and Slavit, David. (2007). Collaborative inquiry among
science and mathematics teachers in the USA: professional learning
experiences through cross-grade, cross-discipline dialogue. Professional
Development in Education, 23-39.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications Inc.