research proposal outlines rss6 2014
TRANSCRIPT
Dr. Fayssal Farahat
Consultant & Assist Professor Public Health
King AbdulAziz Medical City
King Saud bin AbdulAziz University for Health Sciences
RESEARCH PROPOSAL OUTLINES
To outline important items of a scientific research proposal.
Objectives
2nd Advanced Course on Applied Medical Research and Biostatistics 22 – 24 March 2010 3
Outline of the Study Protocol
Research
Question
Significance
(background)
Design
Variables
Statistical
issues
Subjects
What questions will the study address?
Why are these questions important?
How
When
Who
Epidemiologic approach
Time frame
Selection criteria
Sampling design
Predictors Confounding Outcomes
Hypotheses Analysis Sample size
‘Title of Proposal’ • Should be specific But comprehensive
• Short But sufficiently descriptive
• No abbreviations
Provide a brief, informative summary
What goes into the title?
● The Topic (T) – study subjects and setting
- “who, what, when, where”
● In addition, choose one or two among;
M – Methods
R – Results
C – Conclusions
N – Name of study or data set
Siegel PZ, Successful scientific writing
= RATIONALE
Literature review of previous studies on the
subject; and justification of the study by
stating the problem and its public health
importance.
BACKGROUND
To convince the reader that the study is very
important (new and useful information).
1. Identify knowledge gap / limitations (study
problem)
2. Present your approach to filling the gap /
limitations (study purpose).
BACKGROUND
Siegel PZ, Successful scientific writing
• Common Mistakes
– Too much or not enough information
– Unclear purpose
– Confusing structure
BACKGROUND
LITERATURE REVIEW
A separate section, which allows a more thorough
review of the literature
The literature review serves several important
functions:
Ensures that you are not "reinventing the wheel“ .
Gives credits to those who have laid the groundwork
for your research.
Demonstrates your knowledge of the research problem.
Demonstrates your understanding of the theoretical
and research issues related to your research question.
Shows your ability to critically evaluate relevant
literature information
AIM OF THE STUDY
• state the goal you
need to achieve.
• To promote adequate
counseling and
screening capacity for
the Blood Transfusion
Services (BTS) in
National Guard
Hospitals, Saudi
Arabia.
• state the details of each objective that will
finally lead to achievement of the goal.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
S Specific Identifies the nature of the expected
change, the target groups, the target
area, etc.
M Measurable Can be measured in some way
A Achievable Is realistic given the likely available
resources
R Relevant Responds to the identified need or
challenge, and is within mandate
T Time bound Can be achieved in a stated timeframe
or specific planning period
SMART
STUDY AREA/SETTING
• describe the area or setting where the
study will be conducted. This description
should cover the details relevant to the
study topic.
STUDY PARTICIPANTS
• Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the
study subjects.
STUDY DESIGN
• mention the type of study design (eg
cross-sectional, case-control, intervention
study, etc..)
SAMPLE SIZE
• mentioned the input criteria for sample
size estimation.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
• mention the sampling technique, (e.g.
randomization) that will be used on order
to obtain a representative sample for your
target population.
DATA COLLECTION METHODS,
INSTRUMENTS, MEASUREMENT
• The instruments used for data collection
(questionnaire, observation recording
from, ect..).
• Studied variables included in these
instruments.
• Methods used to test for the validity and
reliability of the instrument.
DATA COLLECTION METHODS,
INSTRUMENTS, MEASUREMENT
• Techniques used should be briefly
described and referenced.
• Study definitions (eg case definition)
should be mentioned.
DATA MANAGEMENT AND
ANALYSIS PLAN
• Describe the analysis plan, tests used for
data analysis and statistical package(s)
used.
• Common Mistakes
– Too little information
– Information from Introduction
METHODS
IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY RESULTS
• Expected results and potential
contribution of the project to
the relevant program.
REFERNCES
• mention recent articles relevant to the
study subject and enumerated according
to their order of appearance in the text.
1. Standard journal article
Vega K, Pina I, Krevisky B. Heart transplantation is
associated with an increased risk for
pancreaticobiliary disease. Ann Intern Med 1996;
124(11): 980-3
2. Books and other monographs
Phillips SJ, Whisnant JP. Hypertension and stroke.
In: Laragh JH, Bremier BM, editors. Hypertension:
pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. 2nd
ed. New York: Raven Press; 1995. P.465-78.
References
3. Disertation
Kaplan SJ. Post-hospital home health care: the elderly's
access and untilizaiion (dissertation]. St. Louis (MO):
Washington Univ: 1995.
4. Unpublished material
Leshner AL. Molecular mechanisms of cocaine. N Engl J Med. In
press 1996.
5. Electronic material
Morse SS. Factors in the emergence of infectious disease.
Emerg Inftect Dis [serial online] 1995 Jan-Mar (cited 1996
Jun 5]; 1(1). Available from URL:
http:/www.cdc.gov/ncdod/EID/eid.htm. Accessed 26 Nov
2013.
References
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
• If needed, attached extra documents.
WORKPLAN
BUDGET
• Personnel (Max 30%)
• Supplies and Equipment
• Patients cost
• Training
• Others (specify)
APPENDICES
• Data collection instruments, elaboration on
methods and procedures to be used, etc..)
(Please attach the related documents.
Common Mistakes in Proposal Writing
Failure to provide the proper research question.
Failure to cite landmark studies.
Too much detail on minor issues, but not enough
detail on major issues
Too much rambling -- going "all over the map"
without a clear sense of direction.
Too many citation lapses and incorrect references
Too long or too short.
THINK
REVIEW
STOP
THINK
AGAIN
WRITE
“What is written with little effort is, in
general, read with little interest.” Samual Johnson
“It takes a long time to write a
short story.”
Thank you