reserch designs exploratory

Upload: hitesh-sharma

Post on 29-May-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    1/22

    Types of Research Designs

    Exploratory Research (huh?)

    Designed to generate basic knowledge, clarify relevant issuesuncover variables associated with a problem, uncover informationneeds, and/or define alternatives for addressing researchobjectives.

    A very flexible, open-ended process.

    Descriptive Research (who, what, where, how)

    Designed to provide further insight into the research problem bydescribing the variables of interest.

    Can be used for profiling, defining, segmentation, estimating,predicting, and examining associative relationships.

    Causal Research (If-then)

    Designed to provide information on potential cause-and-effectrelationships.

    Most practical in marketing to talk about associations or impact ofone variable on another.

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    2/22

    Types and Characteristics of Exploratory Studies

    Literature Search

    Conceptual literature

    Trade literature

    Published statistics Library homepage (www.uah.edu/library)

    Analysis of Selected Cases

    Intensive study of related cases or past activities

    May be internal or external

    Can help provide clues as to how other units orcompanies have dealt with similar issues

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    3/22

    Types and Characteristics of Exploratory Studies

    Experience Surveys (a.k.a., depth interviews) Knowledgeable people with varying points of view

    Unstructured and informal interviews

    Respondent free to choose issues to be discussed

    Focus Groups 8 to 10 people at one time

    Relatively homogeneous groups

    Multiple, heterogeneous groups

    Group dynamics

    Moderator is key

    Relies on general topical guide with plenty of time forinteraction

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    4/22

    The Growing Role of Focus Groups

    Goal of focus group research: learn andunderstand what people have to say and why.

    y Find out how participants feel about a product,

    concept, idea, organization, etc.;yHow it fit into their lives;

    y Their emotional involvement with it

    May be conducted alone or as part of a broader

    project May be use to define issues or to confirm findings

    from survey research.

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    5/22

    Requirements for Focus Groups

    Good group of information-rich participants

    How many people?

    How many groups?

    Characteristics of participants

    Discussion guide and outline

    Ground rules

    Agenda

    Guiding questions

    Qualified Moderator Controls flow

    Stimulates discussion

    Analysis and Report

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    6/22

    Good Moderator Characteristics

    Must be able to break down barriers; get subjects to open up withinfirst 10 minutes

    Must be a quick learner

    Good listener

    Absorb content

    Gauge personalities

    Adapt quickly

    Must be in control, but not dominating (guide rather than lead)

    Must appear to be neither an expert nor naive

    Must be flexible to allow for free flow of discussion Dont concentrate too rigidly on the moderator guide

    Keep the big picture in perspective

    Know what is important

    When to move on

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    7/22

    Facilitating Group Dynamics

    Use a introductions to set the tone

    Use only first names in introductions

    Avoid job titles and positions, unless necessary

    State your purpose and establish position as anobjective, unbiased party

    Encourage everyone to participate; no right or wronganswers

    Use an ice breaker to get everyone comfortable

    State ground rules, procedural details

    Ask for permission to tape if possible

    Ensure confidentiality/anonymity Report to contain summary of group, not individuals

    Use write-down method to allow for both introverts andextroverts to have input, and to lock people into theirown opinions (avoids too much group think)

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    8/22

    Handling Problems in the Focus Group

    Confusing Concept or Discussion Topic

    Break the concept into components that are easier to understand

    Use the confusion as a discussion point (ask for theirinterpretation, then attempt to resolve)

    Dead Subject (no discussion initiative)

    Play one person off the other.

    Use projective techniques

    y What color do you most closely associate with . ? Why?

    y What animal does ______ remind you of? Why?

    y What type of people might use? Why?

    Lively Subject (everyone talking, often at once)

    Assert leadership role and take charge Promise more discussion time later

    Suggest that everyone wants to hear all opinions, which is easierdone one at a time

    Use write-down techniques to quiet the group down

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    9/22

    Handling Problems in the Focus Group (contd)

    The Talkative Member

    Leverage his/her energy to you benefit

    Ask the rest of the group to respond to (agree/disagree with) what

    the talkative member said

    Call on someone else specifically when asking questions

    Say, Dont let Ed do all the talking, Id like to hear from

    someone else.

    Silent Members

    Call on them by name (John, how do you feel about)

    Reinforce the value of their responses Do this several times in a row and they will open up voluntarily

    Probe their short answers for more detailed ones

    y Tell me more about

    y That is interesting, why do you feel that way/

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    10/22

    The Moderator/Discussion Guide

    Purpose is threefold:

    Outline flow of discussion

    y Defines issues

    y

    Sets ground rulesy Provides time constraints

    Provides information for participants

    Serves as a guide for the final report

    May be very basic or extremely detailed depending on formality of the

    research. Very exploratory research will require a simple guide

    More extensive analyses need more structure

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    11/22

    Contents of The Discussion Guide

    Introductory Statements (typically 10-15 minutes)

    Moderator introduction

    Respondent introductions

    Objectives/Statement of Purpose

    Ground rules

    Key DiscussionQuestions (45-50 minutes)

    Practice using multiple types of questions to elicit more detailed responses

    Think about the purpose of your questions:

    y Collect information?

    y Maintain flow?

    y Lead respondent? Wrap-up

    Clarify,Verify, Summarize

    Ask All things considered type questions to get them to summarize

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    12/22

    Thoughts on Discussion Questions

    Begin with simple, easy to answer questions

    Place more specific, sensitive questions toward the mid-point in the

    discussion

    Dont want to force them to work too hard early or scare them

    Ensure that questions are short and deal with a single issue

    Utilize vocabulary that is consistent with the respondents

    Include questions that the respondents would reasonably have

    knowledge of and ability to answer

    Remember to keep the tone of the questions conversational, not

    accusational, confrontational, or critical of individuals

    Dont ask questions that would potentially single one person out for

    inspection

    Be cautious about giving examples (might lead too much)

    Use parallel or similar questions to test commitment to positions

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    13/22

    Activities to Engage Participants

    List generation

    Ranking or evaluating items

    May be abstract ideas or concrete objects

    Sentence completion

    Creating analogies

    Picture or word sort

    Create a collage of your feelings

    Drawing a picture or ideal image

    Role playing or enactment

    Personal experiences

    Hypotheticals

    Divide group for debate

    Monitor and follow-up on Nonverbals

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    14/22

    What is Included in Typical Reports

    Depends on type of report desired

    Most focus group reports are designed to answer the

    following questions:

    What was the purpose of the study?

    What were the research objectives?

    What methodology was used, and why?

    What was the group composition?

    What were the key findings?

    As a result, what are the recommendations?

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    15/22

    Techniques for Summarizing Findings

    Identifying comments that are frequently mentioned Evaluating rankings or "votes" occurring over the course of the project

    Grouping similar responses by meaningful subgroups (for instance, mentionsby region, age group, or company size)

    Resolving differences between groups

    Discussing messages with opposing ideas indicated perhaps by body language

    To ensure accurate evaluation of focus group reports, keep in mind several rules ofthumb:

    Avoid quantifying results; remember this is qualitative analysis.

    Look for patterns that show consistent themes

    It is important to provide quotations to support your evaluations. Identify which thoughts were generated through a free-flowing discussion and

    which were actually aided responses.

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    16/22

    O

    n-line Focus Groups

    Advantages

    No geographic barriers

    Lower costs Fast turnaround time

    Do not have to see a moderator face-to-face

    Can reach hard-to-reach managers

    Two way interaction between moderator and the clientis possible

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    17/22

    On-line Focus Groups

    Disadvantages Group dynamics are construed

    Nonverbal inputs are minimal

    Client involvement with participants is practically non-

    existent Security - who is the person on-line?

    Attention to the topic - is the participant paying attention?

    Exposure to external stimuli - can not present productprototypes.

    y Or can we?

    Role and skill of moderator are more difficult

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    18/22

    Depth Interviews

    One-on-one interviews that probe and elicit detailed answersto questions, often using nondirective techniques to uncoverhidden motivations.

    Advantages

    No group pressure

    Respondent is focus of attention and feels important Respondent is highly aware and active

    Long time period encourages revealing new information

    Can probe to reveal feelings and motivations

    Discussion is flexible and can explore tangential issues

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    19/22

    Depth Interviews

    Disadvantages

    Much more expensive than focus groups

    Do not get the same degree of client involvement;

    clients do not want to observe single interviews Are physically exhausting for the moderatorreduces

    the number of people that can be interviewed in a given

    time period.

    Moderators do not have other group members to helpobtain reactions and to stimulate discussion.

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    20/22

    Types and Characteristics of Descriptive Studies

    Cross-Sectional Study Easily the most common type of research project.

    Typically involves conducting a survey of a sample of population

    elements at one point in time.

    Useful because it provides a quick snapshot of whats going on

    with the variables of interest for our research problem. Longitudinal Study

    An investigation that involves taking repeated measures over time.

    Useful for conducting trend analysis, tracking changes in behavior

    over time (e.g., brand switching, levels of awareness, turnover) and

    monitoring long-term effects of marketing activities (e.g., marketshare, pricing effects)

    True panel vs. omnibus panel

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    21/22

    Causal Research Designs

    Evidence to Support Causation Concomitant variation

    y If X is supposed to cause Y, then the two variables must move

    together.

    y If one variable changes, we should observe a resulting change in the

    other. Time order of occurrence

    y If X is supposed to cause Y, then changes in X must precede changes

    in Y.

    Elimination of other possible causes

    y If X causes Y, no other factor could have reasonably caused the

    change in Y at that moment.

    y Must hold all other variables constant.

  • 8/9/2019 reserch designs exploratory

    22/22

    Causal Research Designs

    Experiments are the best way to satisfy elements of causation. May be FieldExperimentorLaboratory Experiment

    Tradeoff between realism versus control

    Examples of experimentation in marketing

    Market test (test marketing)

    Advertising response (recall, affect, attitude toward ad elements)

    Promotional design (consumer response to promotional deals,

    incentives, tie-ins

    Store layout and design

    Product positioning

    Color tracking and package design