resna atsb presentation 2017 - atsb report- new...• astm f2810/f2811 standard specification and...

RESNA Conference 2017WS05 ATSB Report: New AT Standards 2016-2017

1

WS05- ATSBReport:NewATStandardsDuring2016-2017

RESNA2017NewOrleans,LA

R1. The RERC-ACT Testing LaboratoryPrincipal Investigator: Greg McGrew, ME

R1a. Systematic Evaluation of Commercially Available AT Devices: the design of protocols for evaluation of high-fidelity AT

R1b. Iterative Product Design Testing by Using Participatory Action Research (PAR) Methods with Persons with Cognitive Disabilities

R1c. Large-scale clinical trial with persons who have cognitive disabilities to determine factors that influence their use or non-use of the cognitive technology they have selected for use.

www.resna.org

IntroductionvWilliamAmmer,Chair,WheelchairsvPeterAxelson,AdaptiveSportsEquipment&Wheelchairs

vStefanCarmien,Secretary,CognitiveAccessibilityvPatriciaKarg,Chair,RESNAATStandardsBoardvSeanna Kringen,Chair,InclusiveFitness&CognitiveAccessibility





www.resna.org

LearningOutcomes1. ParticipantswillunderstandthestructureoftheRESNAATStandardsBoard,and

itsrelationshiptoISOStandardsActivities2. Participantswillbeabletoidentify3universaldesigncriteriaforinclusivefitness

equipmentandenvironments3. Participantswillbeabletoidentify4universaldesigncriteriafordesigning

productstomeettheneedsofpeoplewithdisabilities,includingcognitiveimpairments

4. Participantswillbeabletoidentity4wheelchairperformanceteststhatwillhelpthembettermatchperformancetoclientneeds

5. Participantswilllearntherequirementsandtestmethodsfordesigningadaptiveskiequipment(sit-skis,mono-skisandbi-skis)

6. Participantswillbeabletoidentify3issueswithairtravelexperiencedbyindividualswhousewheelchairs





www.resna.org

RESNAStandards

• RESNAAssistiveTechnologyStandardsBoard(ATSB)

• RESNAStandardsCommittees– AdaptiveGolfCars(AGC)– AdaptiveSportsEquipment(ASE)– CognitiveAccessibility(CA)– EmergencyStairTravelDevicesforPeoplewithDisabilities(ESTD)– InclusiveFitness(IF)– SupportSurfaces(SS)– Wheelchairs(WCS)– WheelchairsandTransportation(WHAT)– WheelchairandRelatedSeating(WRS)





www.resna.org

RESNAStandards:InternationalImpact• ISO– InternationalOrganizationforStandardization– Internationalorganization– Membersfromallmember“national”standardscommittees(includingANSI/RESNA)

– ISO/TC173/SC1/WG1,6,10and11

RESNAStandardsonWheelchairs

WilliamAmmerAmmer Consulting

[email protected]


2





www.resna.org

WheelchairStandardsü RESNAWC-1Wheelchairs– Volume1:RequirementsandTestMethodsforWheelchairs(includingScooters)

ü Thisstandardspecifiesvocabulary,disclosurerequirementsfortesting,andtestmethodsandmethodsofmeasurementfor:staticstability;wheelchairandseatdimensions;static,impactandfatiguestrengthtesting;flammabilityrequirements;testdummyspecifications;andset-upprocedures





www.resna.org

WheelchairStandardsü RESNAWC-2Wheelchairs– Volume2:AdditionalRequirementsforWheelchairs(includingScooters)withElectricalSystems

ü Thisstandardspecifiestestmethodsandrequirementsfor:dynamicstability;brakeeffectiveness;energyconsumption;maximumspeed,accelerationanddeceleration;obstacleclimbingability;climatictesting;powerandcontrolsystem;andelectromagneticcompatibility.

RERCRecTech(RecreationTechnologies)InclusiveFitnessStandards

PrincipleInvestigator:PeterAxelson,MSMEResearchAssociate:

SeannaHurley-Kringen,MSChairofRENSAStandards

CommitteeonInclusiveFitness

This project is funded by the RERC for RecTech through the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research grant #90RE5009-01-00. 9

FitnessEquipmentandFacilityStandards

• Promote“mainstream”inclusivefitnessenvironmentswithinpublicfacilities– Universaldesign

youth/elderly,rangeofabilities– Health/socialbenefitsforeveryone

• Decreasesecondaryhealthconditions• Increasesocialinteraction

– Decreasecosts• Participation• Healthmaintenance

– ComplywiththeAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA)

10

WhataboutFitnessEquipmentandPrograms?

ADAcoversthebuiltenvironmentbutonceparkedandinsideapublic

fitnessfacility…

Whatdoesapersonwithadisabilityhaveaccessto?

11

ExperienceinFitnessCentersTodayCan’tnegotiatesafelyaroundoron/offequipment

Giveup??

Orriskinjury??

12


3

ExperienceinFitnessCentersTodayCan’tgetasecuregripontreadmillhandrailtobalance whilewalking

Giveup??Orriskinjury??

13

ExperienceinFitnessCentersToday

Strugglingtobalanceonnarrow,non-removableseat

Giveup??Orriskinjury??

14


Nostrapsonfootpedals=Notusableforpeoplewithsensoryand/orfunctionalimpairments

15

ExperienceinFitnessCentersTodayExercisehandlesoutofreach/freefall

Pullpinout,10–15lb.barfalls

Giveup??Callforhelp??

16

ExperienceinFitnessCentersTodayMostcommoncardiofitnessequipment=

Nocardiooptionsforwheelchairusers

17


Staff/trainersexperiencedwithdisabilityInclusiveprogramming/environment

Bothalmostnonexistent

18


4

RESNAStandardsCommitteeonInclusiveFitness(IF)

RESNAIFGuideline—DefinessetofinstructionsforUniversalDesign/InclusiveFitness(UD/IF)facilities

– Layout—ComplywithUSAccessBoard– Equipmentscoping

• SpecifyminimumofeachtypeofUD/IFequipment• Requireonewheelchair-accessibleaerobicpieceofequipment• Equipment validity/usability testing• UD/IFequipment3rd-partycertification

– Staff/trainers—Knowledgeofdisability• ACSM CIFT• UKIFI

– Policies—Attitudes– InclusiveProgramming– IFsymbol—Demonstratescompliancewhereverused

19

DraftNationalStandardforInclusiveFitness

Volume1:StandardforInclusiveFitness(DraftRESNAIF-1)Section1:GuidelinesforFramework/ModelforIF(IntroofwhyweareincludingallareastocreatingIFenvironment)Section2:ReferencestoGuidelines,Standards,Literature,etc.forIF

InclusiveFitnessPolicyInclusiveFitnessFacilitiesInclusiveFitnessEquipmentInclusiveFitnessFacilityLayoutInclusiveFitnessStaff/TrainersInclusiveFitnessUsers/ConsumersInclusiveFitnessProgrammingInclusiveFitnessMarketing

Section3:SpecificationsandTestMethodsforBestPracticesforIF(aboveandbeyondcurrentminimumrequirements)

20

RESNAIF• Engagingagroupofexpertsacrossdisciplinestocreateguidelines/standards

• Internationaleffort

RESNAIFMembershipCategoriesandBalance

21

Allinterestcategories<50%(notasafetystandard)Totalmembership<36

RESNAIFMembershipOrganizations

22

InternationalPerspectiveUKInclusiveFitnessInitiative(IFI)Model• “IFIMark” Accreditation

– Equipment– Facilities

>200organizations550facilities/leisurecenters

IrelandUFIT• Inclusivityplan

23

MinimumScopingRequirementsforUD/IFEquipment

Recommendation:Foreachtypeofequipment

• Atleastone piece ofequipmentOR

• Minimumof10% ofequipment,whicheverisgreater

mustmeetUD/IFStandardsEx.:2treadmills=120treadmills=2

24


5

But how is UD/IF equipment created, tested, and certified?

MinimumScopingRequirementsforUD/IFEquipment

Recommendationfortypesofequipment:• Bicycle• Elliptical• Treadmill• Upperbody

ergometer

• Upperbodystrengthequipment• Lowerbodystrengthequipment• Torsostrengthequipment

25

ASTMUD/IFEquipmentStandards• ASTMF08.30FitnessProducts

– Developfitnessequipmentstandards—100members• Cybex International,ICONHealth&Fitness,JohnsonHealth,PrecorUSA,Nautilus,IncludeFitness,TriActive America,andLifeFitness

– F08.30TagGroupIF:Users,disabilityadvocates,manufacturers,testlaboratories,andlegalexperts

• GeneralASTMF08.30UD/IFStandards—PUBLISHED– ASTMF3021/F3022StandardSpecificationandTestMethodforUniversalDesignofFitnessEquipmentforInclusiveUse byPersonswithFunctionalLimitationsandImpairments

• 117generalrequirementsapplicabletoallfitnessequipment– Identifiedgapsinaccessneedingfurtherresearch

26

ASTMF08.30TagGroupIF

• AdditionalUD/IFequipment-specificrequirements• ASTMF2810/F2811StandardSpecificationandTest

MethodsforEllipticalTrainers—PUBLISHED• ASTMF2216/F2277StandardSpecificationforSelectorized

StrengthEquipment—PUBLISHED• ASTMF1250/F3023StandardSpecificationandTest

MethodsforStationaryUprightandRecumbentExerciseBicyclesandErgometers—BALLOTING

• ASTMF2115/F2106StandardSpecificationandTestMethodsforMotorizedTreadmills—BALLOTING

27

CycleUser—89yrs.old,blind

28

UD/IFRecumbentCycleRequirements

• Walk-throughdesigndimensions– Walk-throughstructurenohigherthan125mm

29


• Seatdimensions—height/width/depth

30


6


• Pedals– Self-righting– Heel/toeretention

31

TreadmillUser–poststroke,usescane

32

UD/IFTreadmillRequirements

• Sidehandrail—functionaluseduringexercise(balance)– Dimensions

• Minimumgriplengthof175mm• Providerangeofheights

– Sidehandrailsorotherstructuralcomponentsshallnotbehorizontal

– Non-slip/Shape• Optimizedinshapetofacilitategrip• Suitablematerialtoreduceslippage

33

UD/IFTreadmillRequirements• Maximumstep-onheightof170mm

• Requireslessstrength,flexibility,andbalance

– Therearesomeisolatedexamplesofimproveddesign,butmostlyfoundinrehabsettingsversuspublicfacilities

34

UD/IFEllipticalRequirements• Standing ellipticals

– Fixedhandlebarrequirements• Provideheightrangeof1000mmto1400mm

• Mechanismtopreventhandfromslippingoff

• Seated ellipticals– Swivelseats– Footsupportguards

• 30mm/12mmalong80%oftheinside/outsideedge

35

• ASTMmembersrequireddatatodemonstrateneedandjustifycosts

• Dr.Barstow,UAB,joinedteam– Providedusertesting/feedback– Strengthenedaccessrequirementsforvisionimpaired/blind

• IRB-approvedstudy(n=200)– Mixed-methodssurvey(33questions)

• Determinedifferencesinconsoleexperience/preference• Resultstodate(n=88)

− 82%withVIand18%withoutVI− UserswithVIwantaccesstoallfeatures

− Audiofeedback—smartphoneacceptable− Enhancevisibilityandtactilefeatures− www.surveymonkey.com/r/VIsurvey

UD/IFConsoleRequirementsforPeoplewithVisionImpairment(VI)

36


7

UD/IFConsoleRequirements

ASTMF3021/F3022(2016)nowcontains28audiblefeedbackrequirementsduetoVIexpertise• Text-to-audiooutput

– FunctionButtons:Start/stopincrease/decreasegrade/resistanceprogrammingoptions/changes

– Performance status/summaries:heartrate,calories,time,etc.

• Maincontrolsmusthavemin.70%colorvaluecontrast

37

UD/IFStrengthEquipmentRequirements

• Seat/backsupportdimensions

• Adjustablestartpositions• Movablehandgripstorage

• 400mmto1400mmrange

• Lowstartweights• Wheelchairuserwarnings—

BIGconcernformanufacturers– Maximumloads– Correctpositionsforstability

38

WheelchairStability

www.nchpad.org

39

WheelchairMaxLoad

www.nchpad.org 40

TestingFitnessEquipmentperASTMF08.30UD/IFStandards

LakeshoreRecTech TestLaboratory• PreparingtoperformUD/IFequipmentvalidationandusabilitytestingonceequipmentisavailable– VerifyequipmentmeetsASTMUD/IFStandards– VerifyASTMUD/IFequipmentusability–meetsuserneeds

41

IFEnvironments—Staff/Trainers,Policies,

Programming• Consideredcurrentlyavailablestandards,guidelines,literature,and bestpractices,forexample:– ACSM—IFtrainercertification– UKIFI—IFpackages/kits/policies– UNESCO—UTMFmodel,UFIT– RESNA—literature

• Identifyingareasneedingthemostfuturework42


8

IFFacilityPolicyGoals

• Consolidatebestpracticetoincreaseaccessforpeopleofallabilitiesandtheaging

• Enablebenchmarking,actionplanning,andprogress monitoringofaccessibility

• Reframethelanguageof“access”to“universaldesign”and“inclusive”

• Allowpeoplewithdisabilitiestoidentifycentersmeetingtheirneeds

43

IFSymbolResearch

• IFsymboltoconveyaccesstopeopleofallabilities

• EquipmentmanufacturersrequestedsymbolforequipmentmeetingASTMUD/IFEquipmentStandards

– Positiveconnotation– Indicateusablebyall

» Restroomversusparkingspot

• InvestigatingusesinotherUD/IFenvironments:facilities,programming,etc.

44

IFEquipmentSymbols

45

IFSymbolResearch• IRB-approvedstudy

(n=825)– Mixed-methodssurvey

(31questions)• demographicinformation• rankingsofthe9symbols• qualitativedata• Internationalparticipation

– Symbols4mostunderstandablebyusers• ASTMF3021nowreferencesthisIFSymbol

foruseonfitnessequipmentthatmeetstheaccessibilitystandards

• Fullsurveyresultstobepublishedsoon

• ContactBethBarstow,PhD,OTR/L,SCLV,FAOTAformoreinformation:[email protected]

46

InclusiveFitnessStandards• Usesuniversaldesigntoimproveaccessibilityforall• Hasalong-termimpactonthefitnessindustry,applyingtopublicand

privatefitnesscenters• Enablespolicymakerstocreatepoliciesandregulations• Definesrequirements andincreasesobjectivityoftesting/evaluation

through3rd-partycertification• Createsinstructionsforprovidingfullaccessfitnessenvironments

– Improvesaccesstoequipmentthroughfacilitylayoutguidelines– Providesguidanceonminimumequipmenttypesandminimum

percentagesofUD/IFequipmentrequired– Definesastandard foraccessiblefitnessequipment– Definesguidelinesforeducatingstaffandtrainersininclusivefitness– Encouragesmorepositiveattitudesandpolicies– Removesbarrierstoparticipationinprogramming– DevelopIFsymbol

47

RESNAIFOutcomes• Enablepeoplewithfunctionallimitationstoidentify

fitnessfacilities,trainers,andequipmentthatmeetstheirneeds

• Allowpeoplewithfunctionallimitationstoparticipate inexercisewithfamilyandfriends− Communityinclusion

• Assistfacilityoperators,trainers,andstaffwithcreatingIFfacilitytransitionplans

• Createresources forIFtraining,layout,equipment,andprogramming

• CreateLakeshoreRecTechTestLaboratory• 3rd-partycertification• Usability

48


9

Beneficial Designs, Inc.Minden, Nevada

[email protected]@beneficialdesigns.com775.783.8822 voice775.783.8823 fax

Working toward universal access through research, design & education

Acknowledgement• The contents of this presentation were developed under a

grant from the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR grant number 90RE5009-01-00). NIDILRR is a Center within the Administration for Community Living (ACL), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contents of this presentation do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

RESNA Standards Committee on Cognitive Accessibility (CA)

Dr.StefanCarmienUniversityofYorkMemberofBritishStandardsInstitute

RESNA Standards Committee on Cognitive Accessibility

ANSI/RESNACA-1:UniversalCriteriaforReportingtheCognitiveAccessibilityofProductsandTechnologies§ Section1:UniversalCriteriaforReportingtheCognitiveAccessibilityofProducts

andTechnologies– General

ISO/TC173/WG10WorkingDrafts§ Assistiveproductsforpersonswithdisability- Guidelinesonhowtointroduce

assistiveproductsforcognitivedisabilities

2

RESNA CA MembershipChair: Knngen Seanna Beneficial Designs. Inc.

*Axelson Peter Beneficial Designs. Inc. Vice Chair: McGrew Greg Assistive Technology Partners

*Bodine Cathy Assistive Technology Partners

Secretary: Carmien Stefan P University of York & BSI

Anderson Nina Mechanical Eng Student, Stanford

Best Shaun Challenged Conquistadors. Inc.

Boger Jennifer University ofToronto / Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

*Mihailidis Alex University ofToronto /Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

Field Chris University of Alberta

Gitlow Lynn Ithaca College

Lewis Clayton University of Colorado

Scherer Marcia J Institute for Matching Person & Technology

Sesker Earlene US Access Board

Vanderheiden Gregg Trace Center

Ward Nancy Medicaid Reference Desk

Westman Karl-Erik Agency for Participation

"Alternates

3

RESNA CA Interest Categories

AcademiaResearch 4 27%

Consumers/Caregiver/Advocates 5 33%

Government 2 13%

ProductResearch&Development 2 13%

TestLabs.TestingAssessment&ClinicalExperts 2 13%

4


10

Unique challenges of standards for cognitive accessibility

• Definingprescriptiveandproscriptiverulesandguidelinesveryhardtodoforcognitiveaccessibility

• CAstartswithdefiningattributesoftechnologyandhowtomeasurethem– modelledonotherRESNAstandards

• Section1:Vocabulary,referenceaxisconventionandmeasuresforbodypostureandposturalsupportsurfaces

• Section3:PosturalsupportdevicesTestmethodsforstatic,impactandrepeatedloadstrength

• Thissupportscomparingproducts/research/prototypesinastandardfashion

• FitstogetherwithbroaderISOstandardswearealsoworkingon

5

The RESNA CA standardThis standard establishes disclosure criteria for the universal design of products used by people with cognitive impairments in all conditions.

This standard is intended to increase access to a variety of products for people with cognitive impairments. This standard reports measurable and functional characteristics of products to assist users in determining if the product will meet their specific needs.

Using this standard does not preclude meeting other applicable standards and test methods for the product.

This standard is intended to help people with cognitive impairments select products for usability in order to reduce impairment and increase function for people with cognitive impairments.

6

Contents of CASection 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 1 Scope ................................................................................................................................ 4 2 Normative references ........................................................................................................ 43 Terms and definitions ........................................................................................................ 4 4 Test apparatus................................................................................................................... 5 5 Initial set-up procedure ...................................................................................................... 5 6 General criteria, measurement methods, and documentation requirements that apply to

cognitively inclusive technologies ....................................................................................... 6 7 Test report ........................................................................................................................ 22 8 Disclosure of results.......................................................................................................... 23 (normative) RESNA CA-1, Sec. 1 Data collection form and test report................................... 24 (normative) RESNA CA-1, Sec. 1 Data collection form and test report tables for multiple

input and/or output criteria and basic functions.................................................................. 35 (informative) RESNA CA-1, Sec. 1 XML template .................................................................. 41 (informative) Criteria Identified for Future Research ............................................................... 56

7

Example of CA text6.1.5.1Colorcoding

Description--- Thistestisavisualinspectionofthesampletodocumentthecolorofeachinputand/oroutputmechanismonthesample.

Equipmentcalibration--- Nocalibrationrequired.Visualinspectiononly.

Testprocedure--- Determinetheclosestpantonecolorofeachinputandoutputmechanismonthesamplebycomparingittoapantoneswatchbook.Determineifcolorcodingisused,e.g.start/stop,increase/decrease,etc.

Disclosure--- Reporttheclosestpantonecolorofeachinputandoutputmechanismonthesample.Reportwhetherornot(yes/no)colorcodingisused.Describeanycolorcodingused,e.g.green/redforstart/stop.

8

International collaborationRESNA CA has membership in ISO/TC 173/WG 10

Assistive products for cognitive disabilities § Participation in ISO meetings§ RESNA CA is the US voice with voting privileges

ISO/TC173/WG10WorkingDraftsAssistiveproductsforpersonswithdisability§ Guidelinesonhowtointroduceassistiveproductsforcognitive

disabilities§ Part1:Dailytimemanagement

- ReferenceANSI/RESNACA-1§ Definingnextsteps§ Part2:Restrooms?Banking?Definitions?ICF?§ Participate/ReviewRESNACAwork

9

Interested in participating? Questions?

• RESNA CA, Secretary Stephan Carmien, [email protected]

• RESNA CA, ChairSeanna Kringen, [email protected]

• Thoughts/Comments, visit: www.facebook.com/CognitiveAccessibility

Pros:•Good contrast•Large buttons•Simple designCons:•Volume and channel buttons lack icons or easy to identify labels

10

This project is funded in part by the RERC for Advancing Technologies to Enhance Independence for Adults with Cognitive Impairments (RERC-ACT) through the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) under the US Department of Education Grant #H133E140054


11

American National Standardfor Adaptive Sports Equipment RESNA Volume 1: ASE

RESNA ASE Volume 1:Winter Sports Equipment

Section 1Requirements and Test Methods for Sit-skis, Mono-skis and Bi-skisEncourage ski areas to require

equipment on the mountain to meet these guidelines

Encourage adaptive programs to purchase equipment that complies

Introduction

Pertains to the testing of sit-skis, mono-skis and bi-skis (SMBs)

Tested as a complete system Standard reference configurationStandard masses used 75kg (165 lb) or

100kg (220 lb)Allows comparison of test results

ScopeA standard for the design, manufacture,

construction, operation and maintenance of sit-skis, mono-skis and bi-skis (SMBs)

RESNA – ASETerms and Definitions

Chair loading height Lifting mechanism – to load the chairliftHolding point – for assistance if requiredLoading height – to load the chairliftSkid plate – to sit on the chairliftSkier sitting height – when skiingTechnical specification sheet

Compliance with ANSI B77.1-2011

American National Standard for Passenger Ropeways

Aerial Tramways, Aerial Lifts, Surface Lifts, Tows and Conveyors

Safety Requirements


12

RESNA ASERetention Device

Holds the skier on the chairliftMade from woven tape, webbing or ropeStatic strength

220 lb load in SMB440 lb force on retention device

ANSI B-77 Evacuation

Provisions for evacuation of Adaptive Ski Equipment

Provisions shall be made for emergency evacuation of common passenger types

Evacuation System Test Methods

Static strength – 3600 lbfImpact strength – 220 lb – 5 ft dropRepeat static strength


13

Lifting Loading Mechanism

Mechanisms for lifting the SMB from the skiing position to the chairlift loading position

Skid Plate DimensionsLocated beneath the seat to slide onto the top

surface of the chairlift seatSecifications

Length, Width and Surface areaHeight in loading positionHeight in skiing position

RESNA ASE Center of Mass Location Measurement

Security of the SMB on the chairlift seatMove forward on 7 degree test fixtureMeasure movement to the balance point


14

RESNA ASE Holding Points and Pinch Points

Requirement for holding points on the side of the SMB

Holding points shall be present and identified with a contrasting color

Other DimensionsSimilar to Wheelchair dimensions for good

fitSkier sitting height with SMB in skiing

position (without cushion)Seat length and adjustment incrementsFoot support adjustment and incrementsHeight of skier SMB can accommodateCenter of pressure adjustment

Requirements for Documentation, Labeling and Disclosure

Requirements for disclosure of test information in the manufacture specifications sheets


15

User Manual SpecificationsRecommended user massInstructions for…

Adjustment of seat, foot and knee supportUse of chairlift retention systemChairlift loading and unload mechanismsEvacuation system

Permanent LabelingManufacturer informationModel designation and serial numberMaximum user massInstructions to read the user manual

Compatibility with ANSI B-77 Chairlift Height

Additional signs for detachable chairlifts

A sign shall be posted stating the nominal loading chair height +/- 2 in.

B-77Chairlift Seat Thickness


16


17

B-77 Chairlift Seat Angle

ChairsTilt back angle of the seat bottom

should be a minimum of 7 deg. when loaded


18

B-77 Chairlift Exit Ramp

Unloading areasShall be sloped no more than 30%Seat height shall not exceed 22 in.

Proposal for the development of Assistive Technology for Air Travel Standards

Peter W. Axelson MSME, ATP, RETBeneficial Designs, Inc.Minden, Nevada

Interest groups for proposed committee

Airline carriers and manufacturersWheelchair manufacturersPassenger boarding service companiesBaggage handling contractorsDisability organizationsGovernment agencies – DOT - FAA Wheelchair repair companies


19

Scope of Assistive Technology for Air Travel

Initial priority - powered mobility devices Information / boarding cardLabeling guidelinesHandling guidelinesTraining proceduresPMDs designed for air transport

Currently PMDs sustain significant damage during air transport

Examples of Damage

RehabilitationInstituteofChicago/BeneficialDesigns/PVA#3028

CourtesyOpenDoorsandGlobalRepairGroup








20

Damage to drive wheel that came off powered wheelchair

Rehabilitatiaon Institute of Chicago/ Beneficial Designs/ PVA #3028

Boarding Card GuidelinesCommunicate visually…Location of drive system disconnectPower disconnect locationSafe lifting point locationsHow to verify use of sealed batteriesLocation of removable partsWeight of PMD

PMD Labeling Guidelinesweight

WHEELCHAIR

82 kg180 lb

WEIGHT

PMD Labeling Guideline Example

The Powered Mobility Device shall use a contrasting color to indicate the location of a minimum of four structural lifting points on the PMD that can be used to lift the product.

The label shall be a minimum of 50 mm wide


21

PMD Labeling GuidelinesLocation of power disconnect

PMD handling issuesStep-by-step instructions for baggage

handlers to handle PMDsVerify sealed batteriesDetermination of weight Determination of where to lift to

prevent injury to handlers and damage to PMD

PMD handling issuesHow to identify if the batteries are

sealed and safe for travel on aircraft

How to remove components that might otherwise be damaged

Ability of the PMD to withstand vibration when lying on its side


22

Development of PMD Handler Training Procedures

Experience of handling different types of PMDs may be infrequent for baggage handlers

Prevention of injury to handlersPrevent damage to PMDs

Standards for PMDs designed for air transport

Create specifications for design features that will enable powered mobility devices to be able to withstand the rigors of being loaded and unloaded from aircraft

Air Transportable PMD design specifications

Equipped with WC19 transport securement locations

To enable securement in cargo area of aircraft

Components that could be removed to prevent damage

Seat cushionControl input device – joystickHead, arm and leg supportsBack support of seating systemCommunication devices

Control input device Connector is typically under the PMD

at the control boxWire ties typically have to be cut to

remove the cableReassembly then requires rerouting

of the cableA joystick with the connector at the

joystick does not have this issue


23


Folding or removable back support to reduce height

Height of typical baggage access door can be as short as 30 inches on DC-9 models


One potential solution…Viewport to verify sealed batteries

Beneficial Designs, Inc.Minden, Nevada

Peter W. [email protected]

[email protected] voice

Working toward universal access through research, design & education





www.resna.org

AlloftheATTechnicalCommitteesareopentoanyoneinterestedinparticipatinginthestandardsdevelopmentprocess.Eachcommitteeisrequiredtohaveabalanceofconsumers,clinicians,manufacturers,prescribers,etc.All

perspectivesarewelcomedandencouraged.

Weneedyou!

Join us!

resna atsb presentation 2017 - atsb report- new...• astm f2810/f2811 standard specification and...

Documents