resolution approving an agreement solid waste 01-07-14

8/13/2019 Resolution Approving an Agreement Solid Waste 01-07-14

1/17

To:From:Submitted by:

Subject:

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEACouncil Report

January 7, 2014Honorable Mayor and Members of the City CouncilJason Stilwell, City AdministratorSharon Friedrichsen, Public Services Director

Consideration of a Resolution Approving an Agreement among MontereyCounty, Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority, Monterey Regional WasteManagement District, Pebble Beach Community Services District and theCities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales, Greenfield, King City,Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, Seaside and Soledadto Evaluate and Analyze Current practices and Options for the Collection,Transportation, Processing and Reducing Landfill Disposal of Solid Wastewithin Monterey County

Recommendation s): Adopt a resolution approving the agreement and authorize the CityAdministrator to execute the agreement.

Executive Summary: The City ha s received a request to consider participating in a countywideeffort to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and analysis of the solidwaste system within Monterey County. The City would share in the costof the study, which is intended to evaluate and analyze collection,transportation, processing an d disposal of so lid wa ste within MontereyCounty to determine and implement opt ions for cost effective,sustainable, and environmentally and economically viable approachesthat meet all State requirements.

Analysis/Discussion: Currently two entities, the Salinas Valley Solid Wa ste Authority SVSWA)and the Monterey Regional Waste Management District (MRWMD),provide integrated waste management services through the County.These entities, as well as other parties to the agreement, have agreed to


2/17

Fiscal Impact:

solid waste, private and public collection, processing, disposal,operational/infrastructure and financial issues of SVSWA MRWMD andthe solid waste management entities of Monterey County that can resultin a more cost effective approach to providing solid waste and recyclingservices to its member agencies, while still meeting or exceeding stateand local waste divers ion mandates .The study is estimated to cost $150,000. A formula based upon anentity's population, solid waste generation and assessed valuation hasbeen developed to determine an entity's cost share for the study . TheCity's estimated cost share is $3,278.

Budgeted yes/no): es Funding Source general fund, grant, state)General Fund

Previous CouncilAction/Decision History: N A

Attachment: Resolution

Reviewed byCity Administrator l City AttorneyAsst. City Admin. D Dir of CPBPublic Safety Dir D Library Dir

D Administrative Services DD Dir of Public Svcs DD Other D


3/17

CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEACITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION 2014-A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT AMONG THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY THE SALINASVALLEY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY THE MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE

MANAGEMENT DISTRICT THE PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTAND THE CITIES OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA DEL REY OAKS GONZALES

GREENFIELD KING CITY MARINA MONTEREY PACIFIC GROVE SALINAS SANDCITY SEASIDE AND SOLEDAD TO EVALUATE AND ANALYZE CURRENTPRACTICES AND OPTIONS FOR THE COLLECTION TRANSPORTATION

PROCESSING AND REDUCING LANDFILL DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE WITHINMONTEREY COUNTY

WHEREAS, the current management and oversight of the collection, transportation,processing, and disposal of solid waste within Monterey County is presently exercised by twoAgencies, the Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority SVSWA) and the Monterey Regional WasteManagement District MRWMD); and

WHEREAS, the City ofCarmel-by-the-Sea is a member of the Monterey Regional WasteManagement District and both SVSWA and MRWMD have acknowledged that it may be beneficial toexamine opportunities to reduce costs and stimulate local economies through efficiencies in thecollection, transportation, processing and reduced per capita landfill disposal in accordance with SB1016) of Solid Waste within Monterey County; and

WHEREAS, the parties further acknowledge and accept that the objective of this analysis isnot to merge the two existing solid waste processing and disposal agencies; and

WHEREAS, it is further acknowledged that both agencies will set their respective rates as theirBoards see fit and that nothing in this analysis bas the objective of establishing a uniform andequalized countywide rate structure between the two authorities; and

WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge that opportunities exist to improve collaboration betweenthe County, the Cities, the SVSWA, and the MRWMD; and

WHEREAS, it may be in the best interest ofthe Parties to agree to work together to evaluate,analyze and ultimately propose and implement such mutually beneficial options to better serve the


4/17

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFCARMEL-BY-THE-SEA does hereby:

1 Approve agreement among the County of Monterey the Salinas Valley Solid WasteAuthority the Monterey Regional Waste Management District the Pebble BeachCommunity Services District. and the cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea Rey OaksGonzales Greenfield King City Marina Monterey Pacific Grove Salinas Sand CitySeaside and Soledad to evaluate and analyze current practices and options for thecollection transportation processing and reducing landfill disposal of solid wastewithin Monterey County; and

2 Authorize the City Administrator to execute the agreement on behalf of the City subjectto final review by the City Attorney; and

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL-BYTHE-SEA this i day of January 2014 by the following roll call vote:AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:ATTEST:

Daryl A Betancur CMCDeputy City Clerk

SIGNED

Jason Burnett MAYOR


5/17

AGREEMENT AMONG THE COUNTY OF MONTEREY THE SALINAS VALLEYSOLID WASTE AUTHORITY THE MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTEMANAGEMENT DISTRICT THE PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICESDISTRICT AND THE CITIES OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA DEL REY OAKSGONZALES GREENFIELD KING CITY MARINA MONTEREY PACIFIC GROVESALINAS SAND CITY SEASIDE AND SOLEDAD TO EVALUATE AND

ANALYZE CURRENT PRACTICES AND OPTIONS FOR THE COLLECTIONTRANSPORTATION PROCESSING AND REDUCING LANDFILL DISPOSAL OFSOLID WASTE WITHIN MONTEREY COUNTYTHIS AGREEMENT is entered into on this day of , 2013 (the EffectiveDate ) by and between the County of Monterey (the COUNTY), a political subdivision ofthe State of California, the Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority ( SVSWA'), a Joint PowersAuthority, and the Monterey Regional Waste Management District ('MRWMD'), a Special District of

the State of Ca lifornia, (the ''Agencies), and the Cities of Carmel-by- the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks,Gonzales, Greenfield, King City, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, Seaside,and Soledad (the CITIES') , municipal corporations, and the Pebble Beach Community ServicesDistrict, together referred to as the Parties.RECITALSWHEREAS management and oversight of the collection, transportation, processing,

and disposal of Solid Waste within Monterey County is presently exercised by the two Agencies;andWHEREAS The Parties further acknowledge that it may be beneficial to examineopportunities to reduce costs and stimulate local economies through efficiencies in the collection,transportation, processing and reduced per capita landfill disposal (in accordance with SB 1016) ofSolid Waste within Monterey County; andWHEREAS the parties further acknowledge and accept that the objective of this analysis

is not to merge the two existing solid waste processing and disposal agencies; andWHEREAS it is further acknowledged that both agencies will set their respective rates astheir Boards see fit and that nothing in this analysis has the objective of establishing a uniform andequalized countywide rate structure between the two authorities; andWHEREAS the parties acknowledge that opportunities exist to improve collaborationbetween the County, the Cities, the SVSWA, and the MRWMD; andWHEREAS it may be in the best interest of the Parties to agree to work together toevaluate, analyze and ultimately propose and implement such mutually beneficial options to betterserve the residential , commercial , agricultural, and industrial ratepayers throughout MontereyCounty; andWHEREAS the Parties agree to participate in a comprehensive process to evaluate and


6/17

GREEMENTThe Parties agree to work together in good faith to evaluate and analyze current practicesand options for the collection, transportation, processing and reducing per capita landfill disposal

o SolidWaste within Monterey County that involve both Agencies and private companies that are under contractwith the Cities and County.

Furthermore the Parties agree:A To maintain transparency; andB. That this effort will be overseen by and managed by a subcommittee comprised of the CountyAdmin istrator, the General Managers o the SVSWA and the MRWMD, the General Manager

of the Pebble Beach Community Services District, and a City Manager from the cities ofMonterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Gonzales and Greenfield , herein referred to as the SolidWaste Subcommittee; andC. That the City o Gonzales will serve as the lead agency for purposes o retainingconsultants and/or experts in the field o solid waste to evaluate and analyze the Solid WasteManagement System within Monterey County; andD. To support the Request for Proposal (RFP) included as Attachment ,A , which purpose andgoal .. is to obtain a comprehensive county-wide analysis of the solid waste private ndpublic collection processing disposal operational/infrastructure nd financial issues ofSVSWA MRWMD nd the solid waste management entities of Monterey County that canresult in a more cost effective approach to providing solid waste and recycling services to itsmember agencies while still meeting or exceeding state and local waste diversion mandates.The comprehensive analysis should be completed in manner that would provide actionablerecommendations for consideration by the Parties. The recommendations considered forimplementation by the SVSWA the MRWMD nd Monterey County should result in

Monterey County constituents receiving the most cost effective sustainable andenvironmentally nd economically viable solid waste and waste diversion managementservices available while meeting all regulatory obligations and liabilities nd to reducewaste ; andE To support systems that continue to reduce waste per capita to landfill, meet or exceed stateand or loca l diversion requirements; andF All efforts will be made to assure maximum participation by all interested parties and that therespective Boards and Councils receive periodic status reports.

Cost Sharing PlanThe Parties agree to collectively fund the comprehensive process per the funding formula


7/17

IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement s made on that date first written above between alland among the incorporated Cities o Monterey County the Pebble Beach Community Services Districtthe County of Monterey the Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority and the Monterey Regional WasteManagement District.CITY OF GONZALESCityManager : Dated:________ _CITY OF GREENFIELD

City Manager: _____________ Dated:________CITY OF KINGCity Manager: Dated:________CITY OF CARMEL-BY-THE-SEACity Manager: Dated:________CITY OF DEL REY OAKSCity Manager:_____________ Dated:________

CITY OF MARINACity Manager: DatedCITY OF MONTEREYCityManager : Dated:CITY OF PACIFIC GROVECity Manager: Dated:________


8/17

CITY OF SEASIDECity Manager: Dated: .CITY OF SOLEDADCity Manager: Dated: _ COUNTY OF MONTEREYCounty Administrative Officer: ted:SALINAS VALLEY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITYGeneral Manager/CAO: Dated:MONTEREY REGIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

General Manager Dated:PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTGeneral Manager: Dated:


9/17

ATTACHMENTRequest for Proposals Scope of Work

ToEvaluate and Analyze

Monterey County s Solid Waste Management SystemThis Request for Proposals is issued on behalf of the County o Monterey (the ,County ), a politicalsubdivision of the State of California ; the Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority (,SVSWA), a Joint PowersAuthority, and the Monterey Regional Waste Management District (,MRWMD), a Special District for theState of California , (collectively, the ,Agencies); the Cities of Carmel-by-the-Sea, Del Rey Oaks, Gonzales,

Greenfield, King City, Marina, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Salinas, Sand City, Seaside, and Soledad(collectively the ,Cities), municipal corporations; and the Pebble Beach Community Services District( PBCSD'), all collectively referred to as the .Parties.I. Introduction

Integrated waste management services in Monterey CountyThe solid waste landfills and waste diversion operations in the County o Monterey are owned,operated, and provided by three separate public agencies, multiple franchise collection haulers, and privatevendors. The Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority (SVSWA) serves the eastern portion o the Countyand operates the Johnson Canyon Landfill. Additionally, the SVSWA operates the Sun Street TransferStation and the Jolon Road Transfer Station. SVSWA is also responsible for the maintenance andenvironmental monitoring of three closed landfills (i.e., Crazy Horse Canyon Landfill , Lewis Road Landfill ,and the Jolon Road Landfill). The Monterey Regional Waste Management District (MRWMD), a SpecialDistrict of the State o California, serves the western portion of the County and operates the MontereyPeninsula Landfill near Marina. The Monterey County Environmental Health Bureau (EHB) provides public

education, some AB 939 services and franchise collection contract administration for the entireunincorporated area o Monterey County and holds membership in both solid waste agencies. The purposeo SVSWA and MRWMD is to provide secure long-term solid waste disposal, assist jurisdictions in meetingstate and local diversion requirements and waste reduction education services to all o its members in anenvironmentally sound and cost-effective manner.II. Project BackgroundA. Difference in tipping fees

There are several solid waste and recycling issues in Monterey County that can benefit from acomprehensive analysis to determine i there are better methods to manage waste and diversion operationsin the County more efficiently. Among the several solid waste issues, but not limited to, are the following :(1) franchised collection vehicles in Monterey County traveling the shortest and most efficient routes to


10/17

MRWMD member agencies, released May 31, 2013, (f) potential pending withdrawal from the SVSWA bythe County, and (g) post-closure landfill costs and liabilities associated with the three SVSWA closedlandfills.Among the issues identified, the Study should include consultant review and analysis on issues (a) through(d) and NOT issues (e) through (f).

There is a difference between the basic tipping fees for waste disposal charged by SVSWA (currenttipping fee 67.00, plus approximately 0.75- 1.00 per household/month for AB 9393 programs) andMRWMD (current tipping fee 48.25). Based on the information provided by the SVSWA, its tipping feeshave tended to be higher for three major reasons: 1) SVSWA has a large debt of 37.5 million which wasused to purchase the Crazy Horse landfill and improve and fix the four old and inadequately funded landfills(Crazy Horse Canyon, Lewis Road, Johnson Canyon, and Jolon Road) that it received from County and theCity of Salinas and to develop landfill capacity, and 2) SVSWA provides transfer station services thatreduce landfill traffic, and 3) SVSWA has an annual landfill legacy liability of 3.0 million per year for debtpayments and maintenance of the three closed landfills . Both agencies have in recent years relied onimportation of waste from agencies and jurisdictions outside of Monterey County to support ongoingoperations. The SVSW A has experienced financial challenges as a result of the uncertainty of this revenuestream. The SVSWA has recently implemented rate changes to provide for fund ing agency operationswithout the necessity of waste importation. Integrated waste management system of the SVSWA should beevaluated based on the full cost of service without waste importation revenues.B Waste hauling patterns

MRWMD owns and operates a site for processing and disposal of waste. It is located at theMonterey Peninsula Landfill site; a 470-acre parcel located two miles north of the City of Marina, one mileeast of State Highway 1 in unincorporated Monterey County. On the site, the District owns and operates aHousehold Hazardous Waste Facility, the Last Chance Mercantile (reuse) store, a five megawatt landfillgas to energy project, a materials recovery facility (C&D, commercial and self-haul) and the MontereyPeninsula Landfill. Waste is hauled directly to the site by franchised haulers serving the seven MontereyPeninsula cities and western Monterey County areas between and including Moss Landing, Big Sur , andCarmel Valley, a service area of 853 square miles .

A transfer station in Carmel Valley is owned and operated by franchise hauler Waste Management.Two Material Recovery Facilities process single stream material, one is owned by the City of Monterey,located in Ryan Ranch and operated by Monterey Disposal Service ; the other is located in Castroville,owned and operated by franchise hauler Waste Management (there are deed restrictions affecting use ofthe Castroville property).The waste flow patterns for the SVSW A are best illustrated by the maps included as Exhibit 2 thatillustrate both the current and strategic waste flow maps.In addition to the structural differences in tipping fees ; service area boundaries and waste flowcontrol restrictions of the MRWMD and SVSW A and the way waste is transported also may impact thedisparity in rates and results in some inefficiency.


11/17

All the Cities of Monterey County, the County of Monterey, the PBCSD, SVSWA and MRWMD, theParties) are requesting proposals from qual if ied firms or individuals interested in conducting an evaluationof the current solid waste management system in Monterey County and exploring alternatives for creating asystem for collaborative approach to solid waste management throughout the County, one that can be moreresponsive to the needs of all Monterey County communities.Ill. Purpose and oals of the R P

The Parties are requesting proposals from qualified firms or individuals interested in conducting anevaluation of the integrated waste management system in Monterey County. The purpose of this REP is toobtain a comprehensive county-wide analysis of the solid waste, private and public collection, processing,disposal operational/infrastructure and financial issues of SVSWA and MRWMD in Monterey County thatcan result in a more cost effective approach to providing solid waste and recycling services to its memberagencies, while still meeting or exceeding state and local waste diversion mandates. The comprehensiveanalysis should be completed in a manner that would provide actionable recommendations forconsideration by the Parties. The recommendations considered for implementation by the SVSWA and theMRWMD should result in Monterey County constituents receiving the most cost effective, sustainable, andenvironmentally and economically viable solid waste and waste diversion management services availablewhile meeting all regulatory obligations and liabilities, and to reduce waste. Acceptance of out-of-countywaste by the District is anticipated to benefit all County ratepayers.The objective of this analysis is not to merge the two existing solid waste processing and disposal

agencies.Both agencies will set their respective rates as their Boards see fit and nothing in this analysis hasthe objective of establishing a uniform and equalized countywide rate structure between the two authorities.

IV. Scope of ServicesThe comprehensive solid waste and recycling analysis being sought by the Parties will require thecompletion of the following tasks: In responding , please identify the order for completing these tasks and

any other tasks that may be necessary to complete the Scope of Work.)1. Facilitate a workshop s) of all Parties to identify and develop a consensus on those operational,financial, political, and legal issues and alternatives anticipated to be addressed in the study,and the process to be fo llowed.2 Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages, and recommend potential cost efficiencies of amodified or collaborative use of the SVSWA and MRW MD facilities and evaluate the best longand short term use of the existing and projected county-wide transfer stations, waste processing

facilities existing and proposed) and landfills in the County, including an analysis of capacityimpacts.3. Evaluate the best beneficial uses, associated costs, and efficiency of existing or proposedtransfer stations, both public and private recycling facilities, both public and private materialsrecovery facilities, and other waste recycling, composting, waste reduction and reuse systemsexisting or proposed within the county.


12/17

7. Evaluate the initiatives, goals and objectives o both the SVSWA and the MRWMD to determinesimilarities and differences and how these policies impact the projected cost of operations,waste disposal, and ability to meet state regulations and goals to reduce per capita landfilling ofwastes.8. Evaluate commercial collection rate structure for unincorporated and incorporated areas o

Monterey County and recommend adjustments.9 Evaluate financial and operational benefits and challenges of Monterey County integrated wastemanagement services, programs and franchise administration not currently under direction othe SVSWA and MRWMD.10. Assess advantages/disadvantages o changing current flow control measures (e.g., wasteroutes efficiency, carbon footprint reduction, etc.)11 . Evaluate how best to fund and meet AB 939 requirements given that the MRWMD , the SVSWA

the County, all franchise haulers, and cities pay for and manage AB 939 programs.12. Evaluate the long-term projected landfill tipping fee rate increases o the different options.

The selected consultant shall utilize the information gathered in the above-described process to developrecommendations and scenarios which would objectively identify potential principles for managing solidwaste and recycling and waste reduction that would create the most cost effective and sustainable modelpossible in Monterey County. At least one scenario should include evaluation of private sector operationsor a mix of public and private partnerships.

The selected consultant shall also develop recommendations that:1. Identify best practices and performance measures that most effectively utilize existing andplanned waste collection and processing infrastructure and future landfill capacity, reduce percapita landfilling of waste and reduce, control or minimize costs for all existing and futureresidents and business in the county.2. Identify options for improved operations, collaboration and reduced costs for all residents o the

County. Options should be consistent with the current Source Reduction and RecyclingElement, the Household Hazardous Waste Element and the Non-Disposal Facility Element forthe County of Monterey and its Cities.3. Identify more streamlined procedures and processes or current and required functionsregarding landfill and waste diversion operations, Materials Recovery Facilities (MRFs),recycling, composting, reuse, and other waste reduction strategies and programs, andassociated costs.4. Analyze options for increasing long-term sustainability.5. Provide options for streamlining the transportation and delivery system o waste, recycling,green waste/food waste/organics, C D and other materials countywide.6. Provide the most effective organizational structure options and identify preferred alternatives.7. Present other options not mentioned here that the consultant believes could provide the best


13/17

turn be responsible for reporting back to their respective councils).VI. De iverables

At the conclusion of the countywide comprehensive solid waste and recycling analysis, theconsultant shall, as described in the Scope ofWork:

1 Provide a Preliminary Report of Findings and Recommendations that effectively summarizesand communicates the required information in the Scope of Services,2. Present the Preliminary Report of Findings and Recommendations to the Solid WasteSubcommittee meeting and respond to the Subcommittees questions regarding the findings andrecommendations;3 Identify key issues and opportunities,4 Formulate recommendations and preferred alternative(s) ;5. Prepare the Final Report of Findings and Recommendations, which would include addressingthe Subcommittees questions, comments, concerns and inclusion of additional analysis .

VII . Final Report & PresentationThe Final Report Issued shall :1 Include an Executive Summary summarizing the findings and recommendations as identified inthe Scope of Services.2. Shall address all areas listed in the scope of services and provide the information necessary forpolicy decisions regarding the operational and service options.3. Include as attachments/exhibits or via reference all spreadsheets, reports , studies, sources, orother documentation prepared or utilized by the Consultant4. Be presented by the Consultant as necessary and directed by the Solid Waste Subcommittee to

governing boards of the Parties of this RFP. In order to facilitate the presentation, consultantshould prepare a PowerPoint presentation or utilize other presentation tools/media to maximizethe understanding of the Final Report.5. Be provided via 15 written copies and in electronic format including all the exhibits, tables,spreadsheets, etc., utilized.

VIII. Proposed TimelineRelease of RFPBidders ConferenceRFP ClosesEvaluation of RFP

December 27, 2013January 13-17, 2014February 10, 2014February/March 2014


14/17

1 Attachment B2 Cost Sharing Plan3 The Parties agree to share in the overall costs which are estimated to not exceed 15 ,000 as follows :4 50,000 between the Authority and District= 25,000 each.s 100,000 between the Cities, PBCSD and County = pursuant to the formula in the table included6 as Exhibit 1 .7 The Parties understand that all efforts will be made by the Solid Waste Management Study8 Subcommittee of MBAMG to keep costs as low as possible.9 The Parties agree that the City of Gonzales as the lead agency will invoice each participant its

1 percentage share of the costs pursuant to the payment schedule negotiated with any retainedconsultants or experts.


15/17

Exhibit 1Cost Sharing Allocation for the Evaluation and Analysis of the Monterey County Solid Waste System

en e yd db percentage ofP opu ation oild aste Generat1onPopulation o f Total % of Solid WasteEstimates Population in Generated11112013. the County Countyv.ide

County/City Total Population 403 167Carmel-By-The-Sea 3,775 0.94% 2.65%Del Rey Oacks 1,648 0.41 % 0.44%Gonzales 8,296 2.06% 1.40%Greenfield 16,729 4.15% 1.69%King City 13,073 3.24% 2.07cMarina 20,073 4.98% 4.75%Monterey 23,991 5.95% 11 .19%Pacific Grove 15,268 3.79% 4.15%Salinas 153,215 38.00% 25.52%Sand City 338 0.08% 0.66cSeaside 29,214 7.25% 7.78%Soledad 16,047 3.98% 2.36Pebble Beach**** 0.00% 3.41%Balance of Monterey County 101 ,500 25.18% 31 .93%

Subtotals 403,167 1 0000 100 00%AgenciesSalinas Valley Solid Waste AuthorityMonterey Regional Waste Management- I Subtota

Total Estimated Budget. epartment of F1nance Demographic Research Umt (511113}: Population M1nus Exclusions**Information from the 2011-2012 Annual Reports of the SVSWA and MRWMD

AssessedValuation100,000

% of AssessedValuat ion Est Cost ShareCountywide

6.24% 3,278.060.46c 435.890.87% 1,443.060.98% 2,274.191.31 2,208.202.94% 4,224.559.01% 8,715.495.23% 4,387.08

17.24% 26,918.460.46c 401.043.53% 6,184.751.30% 2,547.060.00% 1 138.05

50.42% 35,844.13

& 100,000 0025,000.0025,000.0050,000 00

150 000.00

. nformation Provided by the Monterey County Assessor *Amount v.ill be covered by Monterey County

L n:y


16/17

106

CaMRWMD

Sun StreetTransfer Station

r StationJohnson CanyonLandfill

oledad

Greenfield

e Transfer Statione LandfillWaste Origin Delive1- - Waste Transfer toResidue fromAutoclave

SVSWAurrentWaste

Flow

SouthM o Co _ _


17/17

107

SVSWA Strategic Waste Flow

Recoveryenter

Johnson CanyonLandfill

Gonzales:+ I SoledadGreenfiel++\: 1

+Jolon o 'Transfer Station

- City- Transfer Station- Landfill

Waste Origin Del ivery- - Waste Transfer To-+ Residue Fro Autoclave

(optional to Marina)-+ C D For Processing

SouthMo Co

resolution approving an agreement solid waste 01-07-14

Documents