resource assessment grand rapids 1 aerial photo - orthophoto primer bill befort, remote sensing...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Aerial Photo - Orthophoto Primer
Bill Befort, Remote Sensing Coordinator
Resource Assessment Unit, DNR Forestry
Grand Rapids MN
2
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Photo Projects Map Large Areas in Great Detail
3
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
But Photos Aren’t Maps --A map is an orthographic view, and shows every object as if from directly above it . . .
whereas even a perfectly vertical airphoto is a perspective view from a central point.
4
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
. . . maps have uniform scale, projection, orientation, and symbology
. . . whereas photos do not.
5
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Vertical airphotos have maplike qualities--just don’t count on it
6
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
. . . but they’re seldom perfect. They exhibit:
Tip ()Tilt ()
Swing ()
and sometimes even (ugh)
dIsToRtIoN
!
7
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
And they all exhibitTopographic Displacement
Oblique view
Map
Vertical photo (same nominal scale as map)
8
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
. . . which is bad, and good. Topographic displacement (the effect of perspective) is the least tractable obstacle in turning a photo into a map, BUT . . .
it lets us view overlapping airphotos stereoscopically (i.e. in three dimensions), and better still . . .
it’s measurable. By measuring the “parallax difference” of conjugate objects on photos, we can determine their height.
9
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Good aerial cameras have been around for some time . . .
• Metrogon-lens cameras like this CA-8 were in active use till the mid-1980s.
• Their optics matched the Kelsh Plotters much of the U.S. was mapped with: such distortions as the Metrogon lenses introduced, the Kelsh could remove in plotting.
10
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
They Made Great PhotosThis 1939 photo of a portion of St. Croix State Park typifies the 1:20,000 scale coverage of rural Minnesota taken in the first generation of ASCS photography.
It was recently scanned, together with photos from 1950, 1956, 1969, 1983 and 1991, to support historical study of the park area.
11
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Cameras and Films Are Better Now
This 80kb JPEG of a DNR color infrared airphoto in the St. Croix Park area contains only .000005 of the total possible information content of the original 9x9” film it was taken on. That’s 1/20,000th.
There’s a lot of redundancy in modern aerial photos—they contain more information than you’re likely to use.
12
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Modern Aerial Cameras
• Resolving power greater than 100 lp/mm
• Forward motion compensation
• Distortion-free
• GPS-controlled shutter
• Gyro mount can be stabilized within a degree of vertical
The films are better, and so is everything else
13
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
If we want to turn an aerial photo into a map:
We must deal with --
• Camera orientation (tip, tilt, swing)
• Optical distortion, if significant
• Topographic displacement, if significant
If their effects can be reduced to within the relevant map accuracy standards, we’re entitled to call the result an
ORTHOPHOTO
14
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
If tip, tilt and swing are the main problems . . .
They can be dealt with by an expensive photogrammetric
projector with a table and lens that can be tilted and turned to
reproduce and remove the effects of these camera misorientations and bring the print to the desired
over-all scale. This is called PLANE RECTIFICATION.
The projector lens may also compensate for camera lens distortions. But topographic
displacement remains.
15
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
For example --
Back in the 1950s some MN photo projects were
flown with cameras pointed obliquely fore and aft. The negatives were then printed on a rectifying projector to
make sections come out square at the desired scale. The frames
became trapezoids.
16
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
In the digital image world, “rectification”is a term often loosely applied to a
process analogous to plane rectification, in which a
mathematical transformation is applied to rotate, warp, stretch or “rubber-sheet” a digital image to
match a set of known ground control points. As with plane rectification, this process (if the transformation is properly chosen) can compensate for
systematic effects like orientation and scale, but can’t deal with topographic displacement. After transformation, the image must be “resampled” to
a regular array. The whole business is perhaps better termed Geometric Correction.
17
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
To handle displacement, we must talk about--
18
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
For purposes of illustration --
Here’s an old Kelsh double-projection
stereoplotter. Most U.S. topographic maps
were created on this type of instrument. Stereoplotters were
invented to deal with topographic
displacement.
19
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Here’s how it works --When the projectors are properly adjusted in:
• Interior orientation (same inside geometry as the cameras)
• Relative orientation (same tip, tilt, swing the cameras had)
• Absolute orientation (leveled with the mapping surface)
Then as long as the tracing table is kept in contact with the surface of the stereomodel, the pen orthographically traces the stereomodel’s features onto the mapping surface. No more topographic displacement!
20
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Well, then -- If we can contrive to put a piece of film on the tracing table, and keep it in constant contact with the oriented & projected stereomodel . . .
we can record a copy of the original photo bit by bit, with all its topographic displacement removed. The process is called DIFFERENTIAL RECTIFICATION, because each bit of the photo gets its own special treatment.
21
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
All sorts of really wild instruments . . .
were invented for doing this on the fly. Making orthophotos this way brought a new world of meaning to the term “hand-eye coordination.” This is the USGS’s original T-64 Orthophotoscope.
22
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
A French approach
. . . to the problem of orthophotoplotting is seen in this Engins Matra model. Its kinship to the Kelsh type of double-projection stereoplotter is obvious.
23
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Film table of Matra plotter. . . shows the track in which the aperture moves to expose the film.
Telescoping table legs keep the aperture in contact with the stereomodel. The entire aperture track steps across the width of the film to record successive swaths of the orthophoto image.
24
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Moving right along here . . .
-- because film was being continuously exposed! As the aperture was mechanically cycled in X and Y directions across the film bed, the operator was on his mettle to keep it continuously in contact with the surface of the stereomodel by raising and lowering the entire film table in the Z direction!
25
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Orthophoto Byproduct
And as successive rasters of an orthophoto were scanned, the
combined XYZ movements of the aperture traced the topography of the stereomodel. Once methods for recording these movements were perfected, they could be
turned into contours or -- hey! --
Digital Elevation Models!
Minnesota’s early DEMs showed washboard-like traces of their
derivation from orthophoto scans.
26
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
This obviously couldn’t go on . . . it wore out operators too fast. About this time
computers came to the rescue --
• First, with “off-line” ortho scanning, in which the operator scanned the model at his own speed and “played back” the
recorded XYZ movements to film the orthophoto.
• Then later with digital orthophotography, which turned everything on its head. Once the technology became available to move pixels around to their correct positions electronically rather
than photographically, the DEM became, for most users, the driver of the process rather than its by-product. Orthophotos are now typically made by matching a photo with a pre-existing DEM
in a computer. Of course the DEM still ultimately derives from some form of stereoplotting.
27
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
So now it’s all different --And thanks to fast computers, all sorts of people who never heard of double-projection stereoplotters are busy creating orthophotos. These days the necessary inputs (besides scanned photos) are:
• Ground control points
• Camera calibration parameters
• An adequate DEM for the area covered
• Photogrammetric software
28
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
We’re skipping over important details
--e.g., project layout and control, which have a great deal to do with final cost.
29
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
Expressing Film Resolving Power
30
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
So what? Say you had a 1:40,000 negative at 100 lp/mm,
and wanted it all in your computer --
You’d need a scan aperture of 1/200 mm, or 5 microns. The pixels would measure 8” on the ground . . .
And the file, for a color image, would be about 6.3 gigabytes.
31
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
How about orthophoto resolution?How much can you afford? A 50 lp/mm negative contains 1.5gb of potential information. Even an 800ppi scan (right, below) contains
only 1/10 of the total. There’s more data in most airphotos than we can easily deal with.
32
Resource Assessment
Grand Rapids
http://spatialnews.geocomm.com/features/surdex1/
Further Reading in Orthophotography
Demystifying Advancements in Digital Orthophotography