response to instruction problem solving teams process denise stamps-johnson kristie botta julie...

12
Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

Upload: maximilian-harper

Post on 01-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

Response to InstructionProblem Solving Teams ProcessDenise Stamps-JohnsonKristie BottaJulie Carpenter Durgin

Page 2: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

How does Response to Instruction relate to Plan 2020?•Plan 2020 focuses on the following data

elements:▫Achievement▫Gap▫Graduation Rate▫Attendance

Page 3: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

Achievement

•Achievement is based upon the percentage of proficient students meeting the Annual Measureable Objective (AMO) in the areas of reading/language and mathematics.

•The AMO’s will be identified by the school.

Page 4: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

Gaps

•The Gaps will be identified using non proficiencies in reading, language arts, math and the graduation rate.

•The Gap group will consist of students identified in the following subgroups:▫Black▫Hispanic▫English Learners▫Poverty (free and reduced lunch)▫Special Education

Page 5: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

Graduation Rate

•The graduation rates will be calculated using both four-year and five-year cohort rates.

Page 6: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

Annual Measureable Objectives

•AMO’s will be set in equal increments with the goal of reducing half of the percentage of students in the “all student” group and each subgroup who are not proficient within six years.

Page 7: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

Attendance

•The goal for the attendance rate is 95% or higher.

Page 8: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

How will team members know RtI is being implemented in the schools?• Academic Look Fors

▫ Universal screening data STAR Reading Global Scholar

▫ DIBELS Progress Monitoring

▫ AR Data▫ Progress monitoring tools

(Tiers 2 and 3)▫ End of Course Assessment▫ Current level of

performance▫ Extended Day data▫ Local school data▫ Gizmo Reports

• Behavior Look Fors▫ School wide discipline

plan▫ Review 360▫ Behavior Plan▫ Suspension Data▫ Retract/Detention/

Saturday School

Page 9: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

How will the team know that the RtI process is being implemented?•PST Meetings

▫Schedules of how often meetings are taking place (Every 3-6 weeks)

▫Sign in sheets of who attends the meetings. Principals and or assistant principals, general education teachers, counselors and other specialists as needed. (Coaches, Speech Pathologists, EL Teachers, Intervention Teachers)

▫Use of PST Student Intervention form ( PST Manual, p. 31-32)

Page 10: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

What should team members see while observing?•Use of flexible grouping of students

• Evidence of varied levels of support

•Implementation of researched based intervention strategies

•Provision of additional support and resources (peer tutors, one on one instruction, second delivery)

Page 11: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

What kinds of questions should team members ask?• When and where will additional support be

provided?• Who will provide support to struggling students?• Does the schedule allow time to implement the

intervention plan consistently?• What types of data did you use to identify

students?• How often are students being monitored for

progress and what are you using?• How will the school know when the student is

ready to exit PST?

Page 12: Response to Instruction Problem Solving Teams Process Denise Stamps-Johnson Kristie Botta Julie Carpenter Durgin

How will team members know if interventions are working?•Reduced course failures•Academic Improvement/Progress

Monitoring using grades and programs• Improvement of skill deficit areas through

progress monitoring•Behavior improvement•Reduction in suspensions•Reduced numbers in

Retract/Detention/Saturday School/Extended Day