responses to panel questions
DESCRIPTION
Responses to Panel Questions. 1) How to Incorporate User Needs/Requirements?. Who? Data Partners and Science Stakeholders Collaborating projects (esp. climate community), GO-ESSP Broader user community How? User interviews, surveys Direct interactions (esp. stakeholders, science advisors) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Responses to Panel Questions
2
1) How to Incorporate User Needs/Requirements?
Who?• Data Partners and Science
Stakeholders• Collaborating projects (esp.
climate community), GO-ESSP
• Broader user community How?
• User interviews, surveys• Direct interactions (esp.
stakeholders, science advisors)
• Attending scientific, community & project meetings
Going forward…• Continue with outreach• More w/ WG2, WG3
3
8) Number of Registered vs Actual Users
Info provided by Gary Strand for NCAR portal, for 1 April – 11 May 2009
942 unique users They downloaded 20,659
files (~1.5 TB) Ranged from 1 file/user to
2550 files/user Top 20 users by volume
Rank Files Volume (GB)
Rank Files Volume (GB)
1 2307 2818 11 2550 328
2 1819 1067 12 320 320
3 191 889 13 418 262
4 241 872 14 291 258
5 1874 733 15 309 149
6 1703 611 16 167 133
7 619 521 17 33 128
8 144 455 18 222 123
9 575 421 19 130 102
10 316 357 20 79 100
4
7) What Will and Will Not be Done at the End of the SciDAC-2 Project?
Based on endpoint envisioned in original proposal
(On track) (Reduced or eliminated due to different between proposed and awarded budget) (Expected redirection)
Operational federated system (metadata, users) for CMIP5 and US climate community• Versioning, replication, bulk data movement, metrics, monitoring, product
services, security Model/observation integration Rich client access Tighter integration of models and data User support, lifecycle maintenance
• Documentation, software packaging & deployment End-user workflow tools, methodologies
• Implement common server-side analyses & derived products GIS integration Reduced, but not eliminated Model intercomparison metrics
5
4) Examples of Staffing (Approximate Levels of Effort)
ANL 1.75 FTE• Rachana A. 0.40 FTE• Ian Foster 0.10 FTE• Neill Miller 0.60 FTE• Frank Siebenlist 0.40 FTE
LBNL• Junmin Gu• Vijaya Natarajan• Arie Shoshani• Alex Sim
LLNL 1.35 FTE• Robert Drach 1.00 FTE• Dean N. Williams 0.35 FTE+
LANL• Phil Jones
NCAR 3.3 FTE• David Brown 0.1 FTE• Julien Chastang 0.1 FTE+• Luca Cinquini 0.2 FTE+• Danielle Harper 0.2 FTE• Nathan Hook 0.7 FTE• Don Middleton 0.2 FTE
NCAR (cont.)• Eric Nienhouse 0.5 FTE• Gary Strand 0.1 FTE+• Hannah Wilcox 0.4 FTE+• Nathaniel Wilhelmi 0.8 FTE
RPI• Peter Fox• Patrick West• Stephan Zednik
PMEL• Steve Hankin• Roland Schweitzer
ORNL 1.20 FTE• David Bernholdt 0.20 FTE• Meili Chen 0.50 FTE• Jens Schwidder left ORNL• Sudharshan V. 0.50 FTE
USC/ISI• S. Bharathi• Ann Chervenak• Robert Schuler• Mei-Hui Su
+ Co-sponsorship from other projects
6
4) Role of Participants in ESG & Budget
Institution Budget (k$)
Approx. FTE
Work Package
ANL 460 1.75 Security, XC participation
LANL 170 0.50 Operation of data node, ocean analysis, SCRIP
LBNL 320 1.00 Operation of data node, bulk data movement, BeStMan/SRM
LLNL 480 1.35 Operation of CMIP3 portal, next-gen testbed deployment & testing, data node integration, publishing, analysis, product services, collaborations, user support, XC participation, Lead PI
NCAR 422 3.30 Operation of Main portal, next-gen testbed deployment & testing, gateway, collaborations, user support, XC participation
ORNL 350 1.20 Operation of C-LAMP portal & data node, next-gen testbed deployment & testing, software packaging, metrics/monitoring, XC participation
PMEL 180 1.10 Product services (LAS), analysis
RPI 139 1.40 Product services (OPeNDAP)
USC/ISI 230 0.90 Replica location services, data replication, monitoring