restorative justice

13
Restorati ve Justice Clayton Paschke Ben Manger Dana Callahan Matthew George

Upload: karik

Post on 10-Feb-2016

70 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Restorative Justice. Clayton Paschke Ben Manger Dana Callahan Matthew George. Three Different Questions (Zehr). Restorative Justice Who has been hurt? What are their needs? Whose obligations are these?. Criminal Justice What laws have been broken? Who did it? What do they deserve?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Restorative Justice

Restorative Justice

Clayton PaschkeBen MangerDana CallahanMatthew George

Page 2: Restorative Justice

Three Different Questions (Zehr)

Criminal Justice

What laws have been broken?

Who did it?

What do they deserve?

Restorative Justice

Who has been hurt?

What are their needs?

Whose obligations are these?

Page 3: Restorative Justice

Principles of Restorative Justice

1. Crime is a violation of people and interpersonal relationships

2. Violations create obligations3. The central obligation is to put right

to wrongs

Page 4: Restorative Justice

Restorative Justice Process Victim, Offender, and Community ideally meet Panel Face to face meetings Proximity meetings Victim/offender conferences Family group conferences Circles

THE GOAL: Complete a restorative contract that heals as much harm as possible

Page 5: Restorative Justice

History of Restorative Justice in Vermont

1980s: Beginning of community-centered movement in VT

1995: Reparative probation program origins

Role of the VT Department of Corrections

Page 6: Restorative Justice

Vermont Restorative Justice Now

12 active Community Justice Centers

72 reparative boards 45 towns

500 + volunteers

Page 7: Restorative Justice

Success in Vermont Criminals on reparative probation

(1998-2005): 23% less likely to commit a crime on

probation 12% less likely to commit a crime

following probation. Offender re-entry efforts

Department of Justice grant

Page 8: Restorative Justice

•HRC Report (2006) Recommendation #3: Train human relations advisers to provide support to persons who experience harassment.

Healing Victims

•TSW Report (2008): Those who process reports of sexual assault should take a more victim-oriented approach.

Page 9: Restorative Justice

Offender Accountability Strategic Plan (2006) Recommendation #26:

Encourage a culture of collaboration. MC Mission Statement: “We strive […] to cultivate

the intellectual, creative, physical, ethical, and social qualities essential for leadership in a rapidly changing global community.”

Page 10: Restorative Justice

Community Involvement

Strategic Plan (2006) Recommendation #27: Cultivate and support creativity and innovation.

Strategic Plan (2006) Recommendation #30: “Strengthen internal communication, and make sure that all constituents within the Middlebury community feel connected and aware of the matters that affect them.”

College Handbook: “Middlebury College recognizes its obligation to promote the welfare of the College community as a whole.”

Page 11: Restorative Justice

Restorative Justice and Higher Education

Restorative justice is particularly useful for colleges and universities: Small, Close knit communities Sensitive relationships with “outside”

towns and cities Different groups with different needs of a

judicial system: Faculty, staff, students, community

members

Page 12: Restorative Justice

Skidmore College One of the first successful, truly restorative

programs at a liberal arts college in the United States

Restorative conferencing approach used in order to facilitate communication between the offender, victim and community.

Goal driven restorative contracts used to “correct the harm”. Tailored and individual contracts are made in order to prevent generalized community service that is meaningless to the offense committed.

Page 13: Restorative Justice

University of Colorado, Boulder Over 400 instances per year where academic

or community discipline is needed Restorative group approach to dealing with

conflict Restorative contracts made with

administrative, community, and student input. Standardized contracts using pre-established

norms for certain offenses. This is a necessity in the larger UC Boulder

system