results of contamination testing - sa planning...

Coffey World Park 33-39 Richmond Rd Keswick

SA 5035 Australia

t: +61 8 8375 4510 f: +61 8 8375 4499

coffey.com

Coffey Environments Australia Pty Ltd ABN: 65 140 765 902

1

31 March 2016

Our ref: ENAUKESW01493AA-L01.Rev1

Bonacci Group (SA) Suite 14, Level 1 168 Melbourne Street NORTH ADELAIDE SA 5006

Attention: Angus Russell

Dear Angus

Results of Contamination Testing Proposed Multi-storey Building, Pitt/Franklin Streets - Stage 1 Redevelopment

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

Bonacci Group (SA) (Bonacci) required contamination testing to be completed to give an indication of the waste classification of soils for the development of the Uniting Communities property located between 10 Pitt Street and 73 Franklin Street, Adelaide SA (‘the site’).

The site is to be developed in two stages, with the first stage involving the redevelopment of the northern end of the property (fronting Franklin Street) which approximately constitutes 60% of the total land holding. This will include the construction of a multi-storey mixed use tower block.

It is noted that it is generally best practice to assess the actual waste generated in a surface stockpile or stockpiles (if differing materials are encountered) to obtain a definitive classification prior to disposal. However in order to facilitate an estimation of possible waste soil disposal costs for the project, Bonacci requested that this limited scope investigation was undertaken, with analysis of soil samples collected in-situ.

A geotechnical assessment will be undertaken at the site post demolition due to access restraints.

All works undertaken at the site were completed in accordance with Coffey’s standard operating procedures and applicable Australian Standards and Guidelines including the SA Environment Protection Authority (EPA) (2013) Standard for the Production and Use of Waste Derived Fill.


Coffey ENAUKESW01493AA-L01.Rev1 31 March 2016

2

1.2. Objective

The objective of the works was to provide an indication of the classification of the soils beneath the site for consideration of off-site disposal or re-use options.

2. Field activities

2.1. Scope of works

Following discussions with Bonacci on-site access restraints, the following five borehole locations were agreed upon and were targeted for the assessment (refer Figure 1 in Attachment C):

Adjacent to the church spire along Pitt Street;

Within the garden bed along Pitt Street;

At the end of Penaluna Place;

Within the foyer along Franklin Street; and

Within the internal court yard.

The following field activities were undertaken at the site on 10 March 2016:

Professional traffic management was set up for the work areas;

Professional service location across the area of investigation was completed with an employee of Uniting Communities to ensure proposed locations were accessible;

Concrete coring of the concrete at three locations (BH1, BH4 and BH5) and bitumen at one location (BH3) followed by drilling using hand auger method to refusal or at a maximum depth of 1.5 metres below ground surface (mbgs);

Soil samples were generally collected from beneath the hard standing surface, at the sub surface and at the base of the borehole. All visual, olfactory and field screening observations were noted on the drilling logs for all soil samples collected from each investigation point;

All soil samples were collected using a fresh pair of disposable nitrile gloves to prevent cross contamination and placed in clean laboratory-supplied acid washed glass jars, stored on ice in a cooler while on-site and in transit to the analytical laboratories under chain of custody documentation (COC);

All soil returns were logged in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and were field screened for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using a photoionisation detector (PID);

Boreholes were reinstated to ground surface by backfilling with cuttings from the bore of origin, with the concrete core placed back in the bore and cold mix bitumen utilised to cap the surface at BH3; and

Selected soil samples were submitted from each investigation location for laboratory analysis for identified chemicals of potential concern (COPC), including hydrocarbons, pesticides and heavy metals, with one sample analysed for a range of analytes included in the SA Waste Screen. Quality control samples were also collected and submitted for laboratory analysis of selected analytes.



3

2.2. Ground conditions encountered

The ground conditions encountered during the assessment varied across the site with variable fill materials encountered at all locations. Where natural soils were encountered at BH1 adjacent to the church spire and at BH5 within the internal courtyard, low to high plasticity clays were noted with variable proportions of calcrete gravels throughout.

At borehole BH2 within the garden bed along Pitt Street, a silt fill material (organic garden soil) was encountered to the base of the garden bed at 0.5mbgs where concrete was encountered.

At the end of Penaluna Place where BH3 was located, granular fill materials were encountered beneath the bitumen surface to the base of hole at 0.75mbgs where refusal was noted on concrete. On top of the concrete encountered at 0.75mbgs, a black tar like substance was noted and it is possible that this substance is a sealant over a possible surface.

Borehole BH4 within the foyer on Franklin Street encountered concrete to 0.15mbgs, underlain by clay fill and refusal was met on another concrete surface underlying at 0.2mbgs.

No visual or olfactory observations of potential soil contamination were made during the fieldworks and PID screening did not reveal the presence of VOCs within the soils encountered.

Drilling logs are provided in Attachment D.

3. Analytical results

3.1. Analytical laboratories

All primary, intra-laboratory and quality control soil samples were forwarded to Eurofins│MGT Environmental Testing Australia Pty Ltd (Eurofins). All inter-laboratory soil samples were forwarded to ALS Laboratory Group (ALS). Eurofins and ALS are National Association Testing Authority (NATA) accredited for all analyses requested.

3.2. Waste classification criteria

To provide an indication of the likely classification of the soils beneath the site that will require removal during construction, the SA EPA (2013) Standard for the production and use of Waste Derived Fill (October 2013) and SA EPA 889/10 Current criteria for the classification of waste - including Industrial and Commercial Waste (Listed) and Waste Soil (March 2010) waste disposal guidelines have been adopted and presented within Table 1.

SA EPA waste disposal guidelines provide maximum concentration values for classification of waste soil for re-use or disposal as:

Waste Fill (WF);

Intermediate Landfill Cover (ILC); and

Low Level Contaminated Waste (LLCW).

3.3. Soil analytical results

Soil analytical results, including QC data and comparisons to waste classification criteria, are presented in Table 1 (Attachment E). Laboratory certificates of analysis and chain of custody (COC) documentation with analysis requests are provided in Attachment F.



4

The dry weight analytical results reported concentrations of the following analytes above the waste criteria within the fill materials beneath the site:

Benzo(a)pyrene above the LLCW criteria at the soil sample collected from fill materials at BH4_0.15-0.2mbgs (5.8mg/kg) situated in the foyer area in the northern part of the site; and

Total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) above the WF criteria at the soil sample collected from fill materials at BH5_0.2-0.3mbgs (12mg/kg) situated in the internal courtyard and above the ILC criteria at the soil sample collected from fill materials at BH4_0.15-0.2mbgs (43mg/kg) situated in the foyer area in the northern part of the site.

The dry weight soil analytical results reported all concentrations of the requested analytes below the waste fill criteria for the natural soils beneath the site (two locations only).

We note no testing was completed on soils from BH2 as these were not considered to be representative of the subsurface (beneath the garden bed).

3.4. Quality of analytical data

Coffey has reviewed the outcomes and findings of both the field and laboratory quality control (QC) component of the soil sampling assessment work conducted in the area of investigation.

The calculated relative percentage difference (RPD) between the primary and inter-laboratory (triplicate) replicate samples was found to be acceptable for all analytes, with the exception of some metals which are considered to be associated with the heterogeneous distribution of these chemical substances within the fill material. The RPDs are not considered to affect the integrity of the results and where there is a higher dry weight concentration reported in the replicate, the highest value has been adopted as a conservative measure.

Coffey considers that the soil field QC and laboratory QC results are acceptable for the purposes of this investigation.

4. Conclusions

4.1. Investigation findings

The five shallow exploratory holes undertaken across the northern part of the proposed development area revealed a variable sequence of fill materials, both in terms of nature and thickness, overlying natural clay soils. Subsurface obstructions (probably concrete) were encountered at three of the locations, at depths of between 0.2 and 0.75 mbgs, preventing determination of the thickness of fill cover in the north eastern, western and southern parts of the investigation area.

The chemical analytical results from this limited investigation have reported that three of the five fill soil samples tested and both of the natural soil samples tested reported chemical results below WF maximum dry weight concentrations for the chemicals analysed. Visual observations of soils arisings and the results of primary and replicate sample chemical analysis indicate the fill materials to be heterogeneous.

Elevated concentrations of PAHs including benzo(a)pyrene identifying material as potentially exceeding LLCW criteria have been reported in a sample of fill material at BH4 located within the church foyer. Given the only soil available for sampling at this borehole location was from a 50mm thick layer between the surface concrete pavement and underlying layer of concrete it is considered that this material may not be representative of the majority of the subsurface in this vicinity.

Elevated concentrations of PAHs identifying material as potentially exceeding WF chemical criteria but below ILC maximum criteria were also reported in fill materials at BH5 located within the internal



5

courtyard. These impacts were identified in a sample from a clay layer at 0.2-0.3mbgs with the underlying fill sample at 0.3-0.4mbgs reporting concentrations of PAHs below the WF maximum dry weight concentrations for the chemicals analysed.

Given that refusal was noted at a number of locations on concrete, further investigation beneath these areas would be required to determine the condition of the soils. It is recommended to undertake further investigation post demolition where access restrictions are not an issue.

The sample analysis conducted is insufficient to provide an in-situ waste classification of the soils as per the SA EPA (2013) WDF standard that requires one sample per 250m

3 of soil (of each lithology)

to be classified for off-site disposal or reuse (or a minimum of five) to be chemically tested to determine the waste classification.

Leachate testing will be required on certain chemicals (i.e. benzo(a)pyrene) exceeding the waste criteria for any future works to determine if treatment would be required prior to disposal to landfill.

On the basis of the findings of this limited scope investigation it is considered likely that waste soils derived from excavations will meet a range of waste classifications from Waste Fill through to exceeding Low Level Contaminated Waste. Volumes of each waste classification will, to some degree, depend on the manner in which the waste soil is segregated during excavation. Advice on possible general assumptions to adopt to gain an initial estimate of waste volumes is provided in Section 4.2.

4.2. Estimation of waste volumes

As indicated in Section 1 it is it is generally best practice to assess the actual waste generated in a surface stockpile or stockpiles (if differing materials are encountered) to obtain a definitive classification prior to disposal. However, the information obtained from this limited scope assessment can be used to make some general assumptions regarding classification of waste soils for preliminary estimation purposes.

On the basis of the chemical testing conducted within fill materials, three of the five samples tested reported results below the WF criteria which may indicate that approximately 60% of the fill material beneath the site may meet the WF classification providing the material is screened to remove any material >100mm in size. The remaining two fill soil samples tested reported results exceeding ILC in one sample and exceeding LLCW criteria in the other sample. This indicates that if the remainder of the fill material beneath the site (40%) is disposed of as a ‘body of waste’, it may meet the LLCW classification.

Natural soils where only encountered at two locations and the testing conducted from these two locations reported results below the WF criteria which indicates the natural soils beneath the site may meet the WF classification.

Of the five locations investigated, three encountered concrete obstructions which may indicate that there are former cellars/basements beneath the site associated with earlier buildings than the existing structure and over an estimation of 60% of the existing building footprint. It could therefore be assumed that fill material could be encountered to a depth of approximately 2.5mbgs over an estimated 60% of the building footprint and up to 0.7mbgs over the remainder based on the two locations where there were no obstructions and natural soils were encountered.

The data presented herein can be utilised for a preliminary estimate of waste disposal volumes and costs however, the costs should be treated with caution given the limited nature of the results of this investigation.

It would be prudent to carry out additional chemical testing when the forthcoming geotechnical investigation is undertaken to further evaluate the likely waste classification and/or additional



6

sampling could be undertaken in accessible areas pre-demolition specifically to get more information of the nature and extent of the fill and more surety on the likely waste classification.

Where heterogeneous fill is present on a site such as this, it is often not possible to achieve truly representative sampling when obtaining samples in-situ, because such a small proportion of the waste material is visible to the assessor. There is therefore generally a significant degree of risk with classifications of heterogeneous fill determined on the basis of in-situ sampling and a conservative approach is generally adopted. It is recommended that testing of the waste soils is carried out ex-situ following excavation to confirm the waste classification. This can be undertaken during the works as the soil is excavated and stockpiled on-site or at a landfill under a temporary storage agreement. This will provide a classification of the body (or bodies) of waste rather than at specific locations beneath the site. Given the complexities associated with in-situ sampling of heterogeneous fill, ex-situ sampling tends to lead to lower waste classifications, resulting in lower waste disposal costs.

All findings and conclusions presented in this report must be read in conjunction with the attached ‘Important information about Coffey Environmental Report’ provided as Attachment A.

For and on behalf of Coffey

Felicia Mellors Senior Environmental Scientist

Dr David Tully Senior Principal Geoenvironmental Engineer

Attachments:

Attachment A – Important information about your Coffey Environmental Report Attachment B – References Attachment C – Figure Attachment D – Drilling logs Attachment E – Table Attachment F – Laboratory certificates of analysis and chain of custody documentation

Attachment A - Important information about your Coffey Environmental Report

Important information about your Coffey Environmental Report

1. Introduction

This report has been prepared by Coffey for you, as Coffey’s client, in accordance with our agreed purpose, scope, schedule and budget. The report has been prepared using accepted procedures and practices of the consulting profession at the time it was prepared, and the opinions, recommendations and conclusions set out in the report are made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices of that profession. The report is based on information gained from environmental conditions (including assessment of some or all of soil, groundwater, vapour and surface water) and supplemented by reported data of the local area and professional experience. Assessment has been scoped with consideration to industry standards, regulations, guidelines and your specific requirements, including budget and timing. The characterisation of site conditions is an interpretation of information collected during assessment, in accordance with industry practice, This interpretation is not a complete description of all material on or in the vicinity of the site, due to the inherent variation in spatial and temporal patterns of contaminant presence and impact in the natural environment. Coffey may have also relied on data and other information provided by you and other qualified individuals in preparing this report. Coffey has not verified the accuracy or completeness of such data or information except as otherwise stated in the report. For these reasons the report must be regarded as interpretative, in accordance with industry standards and practice, rather than being a definitive record. 2. Your report has been written for a specific

purpose

Your report has been developed for a specific purpose as agreed by us and applies only to the site or area investigated. Unless otherwise stated in the report, this report cannot be applied to an adjacent site or area, nor can it be used when the nature of the specific purpose changes from that which we agreed. For each purpose, a tailored approach to the assessment of potential soil and groundwater contamination is required. In most cases, a key objective is to identify, and if possible quantify, risks that both recognised and potential contamination posed in the context of the agreed purpose. Such risks may be financial (for example, clean up costs or constraints on site use) and/or physical (for example, potential health risks to users of the site or the general public). 3. Limitations of the Report

The work was conducted, and the report has been

prepared, in response to an agreed purpose and scope, within time and budgetary constraints, and in reliance on certain data and information made available to Coffey. The analyses, evaluations, opinions and conclusions presented in this report are based on that purpose and scope, requirements, data or information, and they could change if such requirements or data are inaccurate or incomplete. This report is valid as of the date of preparation. The condition of the site (including subsurface conditions) and extent or nature of contamination or other environmental hazards can change over time, as a result of either natural processes or human influence. Coffey should be kept appraised of any such events and should be consulted for further investigations if any changes are noted, particularly during construction activities where excavations often reveal subsurface conditions. In addition, advancements in professional practice regarding contaminated land and changes in applicable statues and/or guidelines may affect the validity of this report. Consequently, the currency of conclusions and recommendations in this report should be verified if you propose to use this report more than 6 months after its date of issue. The report does not include the evaluation or assessment of potential geotechnical engineering constraints of the site. 4. Interpretation of factual data

Environmental site assessments identify actual conditions only at those points where samples are taken and on the date collected. Data derived from indirect field measurements, and sometimes other reports on the site, are interpreted by geologists, engineers or scientists to provide an opinion about overall site conditions, their likely impact with respect to the report purpose and recommended actions. Variations in soil and groundwater conditions may occur between test or sample locations and actual conditions may differ from those inferred to exist. No environmental assessment program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal all subsurface details and anomalies. Similarly, no professional, no matter how well qualified, can reveal what is hidden by earth, rock or changed through time. The actual interface between different materials may be far more gradual or abrupt than assumed based on the facts obtained. Nothing can be done to change the actual site conditions which exist, but steps can be taken to reduce the impact of unexpected conditions. For this reason, parties involved with land acquisition, management and/or redevelopment should retain the services of a suitably qualified and experienced environmental consultant through the development and

use of the site to identify variances, conduct additional tests if required, and recommend solutions to unexpected conditions or other unrecognised features encountered on site. Coffey would be pleased to assist with any investigation or advice in such circumstances. 5. Recommendations in this report

This report assumes, in accordance with industry practice, that the site conditions recognised through discrete sampling are representative of actual conditions throughout the investigation area. Recommendations are based on the resulting interpretation. Should further data be obtained that differs from the data on which the report recommendations are based (such as through excavation or other additional assessment), then the recommendations would need to be reviewed and may need to be revised. 6. Report for benefit of client

Unless otherwise agreed between us, the report has been prepared for your benefit and no other party. Other parties should not rely upon the report or the accuracy or completeness of any recommendation and should make their own enquiries and obtain independent advice in relation to such matters. Coffey assumes no responsibility and will not be liable to any other person or organisation for, or in relation to, any matter dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report, or for any loss or damage suffered by any other person or organisation arising from matters dealt with or conclusions expressed in the report. To avoid misuse of the information presented in your report, we recommend that Coffey be consulted before the report is provided to another party who may not be familiar with the background and the purpose of the report. In particular, an environmental disclosure report for a property vendor may not be suitable for satisfying the needs of that property’s purchaser. This report should not be applied for any purpose other than that stated in the report.

7. Interpretation by other professionals

Costly problems can occur when other professionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations of a report. To help avoid misinterpretations, a suitably qualified and experienced environmental consultant should be retained to explain the implications of the report to other professionals referring to the report and then review plans and specifications produced to see how other professionals have incorporated the report findings. Given Coffey prepared the report and has familiarity with the site, Coffey is well placed to provide such assistance. If another party is engaged to interpret the recommendations of the report, there is a risk that the contents of the report may be misinterpreted and Coffey disowns any responsibility for such misinterpretation. 8. Data should not be separated from the report

The report as a whole presents the findings of the site assessment and the report should not be copied in part or altered in any way. Logs, figures, laboratory data, drawings, etc. are customarily included in our reports and are developed by scientists or engineers based on their interpretation of field logs, field testing and laboratory evaluation of samples. This information should not under any circumstances be redrawn for inclusion in other documents or separated from the report in any way. This report should be reproduced in full. No responsibility is accepted for use of any part of this report in any other context or for any other purpose or by third parties. 9. Responsibility

Environmental reporting relies on interpretation of factual information using professional judgement and opinion and has a level of uncertainty attached to it, which is much less exact than other design disciplines. This has often resulted in claims being lodged against consultants, which are unfounded. As noted earlier, the recommendations and findings set out in this report should only be regarded as interpretive and should not be taken as accurate and complete information about all environmental media at all depths and locations across the site.

Attachment B - References

References

NEPC (2013) National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999,

as amended in 2013, National Environment Protection Council

SA EPA (2010) Current criteria for the classification of waste - including Industrial and Commercial

Waste (Listed) and Waste Soil. Information sheet EPA 889/10

SA EPA (2013) Standard for the Production and Use of Waste Derived Fill (October, 2013)

Attachment C - Figure

Figure 1: Pitt/Franklin Street Stage 1 Redevelopment

Bonacci Group

Legend Boreholes

Inferred site boundary

30 mN

➤➤

NImage © 2016 Aerometrex

Image © 2016 Aerometrex

Image © 2016 Aerometrex© 2016 Google

© 2016 Google

© 2016 Google

Attachment D - Drilling logs

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

CL

CONCRETE

FILL: Gravelly SAND, pale yellow, fine-mediium subangular gravels, coarsesand, some red brick fragments presentFILL: Sandy CLAY, dark orange brown with some black mottles

CLAY: pale orange brown, low plasticity, fine-medium sub angular calcretegravels present, moist

BH1 terminated at 1.5mbgs as required

0.15-0.25

0.5-0.6

0.65-0.8

1.4-1.5

(Color, Texture, Structure)

Sam

ple

ID%

Rec

over

y

Geologic descriptions are based on ASTM Standard D 2487-93 and the USCS.

Description

Blo

w C

ount

US

CS

Cla

ss.

Dep

th(m

.)

Rec

over

y

PID

(ppm

)

Gra

phic

Log

Adjacent to the Church spire

Water Level Initial

1.5 m.NA North

COMMENTS

NA

Fill Material

Method

StaticNA

NA

Hand Auger

Top of Casing

Log By Andrew James

NA

Drill Co.

EastTotal Hole Depth75 mm.NA

Casing: Dia

Hand Auger

Type

Screen: Dia Type/Size

Soil returns

Surface Elev.NA

Rig/Core

Driller

NALength

NA

10/3/16 Permit #

Length

FM

NA

Diameter

NA

NA

Chris Olsen

AussieProbe

Checked By License No.

Date

NA NA

Corner Pitt & Franklins Streets, Adelaide

Drilling Log

Pitt/Franklin Streets - Stage 1 Redevelopment

Location

Hand Auger Hole

Proj. No.

Project Bonacci Group

ENAUKESW01493AA

BH1

0

1

2

Owner

Page: 1 of 1

CO

FF

EY

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

Rev

: 16

/7/1

3 E

NA

UK

ES

W01

493A

A-L

OG

S.G

PJ

IT

_CO

RP

.GD

T

22/3

/16

29

FILL: SILT, dark brown (organic garden soil), fine-medium gravels andbrick/rock fragments present

Refusal on concrete

0.0-0.2


Sam

ple

ID%

Rec

over

y


Description

Blo

w C

ount

US

CS

Cla

ss.

Dep

th(m

.)

Rec

over

y

PID

(ppm

)

Gra

phic

Log

Within the garden bed on PittStreet

Water Level Initial

0.5 m.NA North

COMMENTS

NA

Fill Material

Method

StaticNA

NA

Hand Auger

Top of Casing

Log By Andrew James

NA

Drill Co.


Casing: Dia

Hand Auger

Type


Soil returns

Surface Elev.NA

Rig/Core

Driller

NALength

NA

10/3/16 Permit #

Length

FM

NA

Diameter

NA

NA

Chris Olsen

AussieProbe


Date

NA NA


Drilling Log


Location

Hand Auger Hole

Proj. No.


ENAUKESW01493AA

BH2

0

1

Owner

Page: 1 of 1

CO

FF

EY

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

Rev

: 16

/7/1

3 E

NA

UK

ES

W01

493A

A-L

OG

S.G

PJ

IT

_CO

RP

.GD

T

22/3

/16

0.0

0.0

0.2

BITUMENFILL: Gravelly SAND, yellow, coarse grained, cobbles up to 150mm

FILL: CLAY, grey/green, high plasticity

Tar like substance encountered over concrete. Refusal on concrete

0.1-0.2

0.6-0.7

0.7-0.75


Sam

ple

ID%

Rec

over

y


Description

Blo

w C

ount

US

CS

Cla

ss.

Dep

th(m

.)

Rec

over

y

PID

(ppm

)

Gra

phic

Log

End of Penaluna Place

Water Level Initial

0.8 m.NA North

COMMENTS

NA

Fill Material

Method

StaticNA

NA

Hand Auger

Top of Casing

Log By Andrew James

NA

Drill Co.


Casing: Dia

Hand Auger

Type


Soil returns

Surface Elev.NA

Rig/Core

Driller

NALength

NA

10/3/16 Permit #

Length

FM

NA

Diameter

NA

NA

Chris Olsen

AussieProbe


Date

NA NA


Drilling Log


Location

Hand Auger Hole

Proj. No.


ENAUKESW01493AA

BH3

0

1

Owner

Page: 1 of 1

CO

FF

EY

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

Rev

: 16

/7/1

3 E

NA

UK

ES

W01

493A

A-L

OG

S.G

PJ

IT

_CO

RP

.GD

T

22/3

/16

0.0

CONCRETE

FILL: Gravelly sandy CLAY, brown, firm

Refusal on concrete

0.15-0.2


Sam

ple

ID%

Rec

over

y


Description

Blo

w C

ount

US

CS

Cla

ss.

Dep

th(m

.)

Rec

over

y

PID

(ppm

)

Gra

phic

Log

Within foyer on Franklin Street

Water Level Initial

0.2 m.NA North

COMMENTS

NA

Fill Material

Method

StaticNA

NA

Hand Auger

Top of Casing

Log By Andrew James

NA

Drill Co.


Casing: Dia

Hand Auger

Type


Soil returns

Surface Elev.NA

Rig/Core

Driller

NALength

NA

10/3/16 Permit #

Length

FM

NA

Diameter

NA

NA

Chris Olsen

AussieProbe


Date

NA NA


Drilling Log


Location

Hand Auger Hole

Proj. No.


ENAUKESW01493AA

BH4

0

1

Owner

Page: 1 of 1

CO

FF

EY

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

Rev

: 16

/7/1

3 E

NA

UK

ES

W01

493A

A-L

OG

S.G

PJ

IT

_CO

RP

.GD

T

22/3

/16

18

5.9

0.4

3.4

0.4

0.0

0.0

CH

CL

CONCRETEFILL: SAND, orange, coarse grainedFILL: Silty SAND, blank (organic), trace fine gravels

FILL: CLAY, orange brown, low plasticity

FILL: Gravelly silty CLAY, pale brown with some calcareous finegravels/mottling

As above with colour change to dark brown

CLAY: orange brown, high plasticity, becoming paler brown with depth

CLAY: pale orange brown, low plasticity, some fine calcareous gravels

BH5 terminated at 1.5mbgs as required

0.0-0.1

0.1-0.2

0.2-0.3

0.3-0.4

0.5-0.6

0.7-0.8

1.4-1.5


Sam

ple

ID%

Rec

over

y


Description

Blo

w C

ount

US

CS

Cla

ss.

Dep

th(m

.)

Rec

over

y

PID

(ppm

)

Gra

phic

Log

Within the internal courtyard

Water Level Initial

1.5 m.NA North

COMMENTS

NA

Fill Material

Method

StaticNA

NA

Hand Auger

Top of Casing

Log By Andrew James

NA

Drill Co.


Casing: Dia

Hand Auger

Type


Soil returns

Surface Elev.NA

Rig/Core

Driller

NALength

NA

10/3/16 Permit #

Length

FM

NA

Diameter

NA

NA

Chris Olsen

AussieProbe


Date

NA NA


Drilling Log


Location

Hand Auger Hole

Proj. No.


ENAUKESW01493AA

BH5

0

1

2

Owner

Page: 1 of 1

CO

FF

EY

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

Rev

: 16

/7/1

3 E

NA

UK

ES

W01

493A

A-L

OG

S.G

PJ

IT

_CO

RP

.GD

T

22/3

/16

Attachment E - Table

Table 1Soil Analytical Results

Bonacci Group Pitt/Franklin Street Redevelopment

[

SampleCode M16‐Ma11278 M16‐Ma11279 M16‐Ma11280 M16‐Ma11281 M16‐Ma11282 M16‐Ma11286 M16‐Ma11283 M16‐Ma11285 EM1602682‐001 M16‐Ma11284Field_ID BH1_0.5‐0.6 BH1_0.65‐0.8 BH3_0.6‐0.7 BH4_0.15‐0.2 BH5_0.2‐0.3 BH5_0.3‐0.4 BH5_0.7‐0.8 QC2 QC2A QC1Sample_Depth_Range (m) 0.5‐0.6 0.65‐0.8 0.6‐0.7 0.15‐0.2 0.2‐0.3 0.3‐0.4 0.7‐0.8Sampled_Date 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016SampleComments Fill Natural Fill Fill Fill Fill Natural Trip Blank

Chem_Group ChemName Units LORBenzene mg/kg 0.1 15 5 1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 # <0.2 # <1Toluene mg/kg 0.1 500 50 1.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 # <0.5 # <1Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 1000 100 3.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 # <0.5 # <1Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 # <0.5 # <2Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 # <0.5 # <1Xylene Total mg/kg 0.3 1800 180 14 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 # <1 # <3Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <1 # <1C6 ‐ C10 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 # <10 # <20C6‐C10 less BTEX (F1) mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 # <10 # <20>C10‐C16 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 # <50 # <50>C10‐C16 less Naphthalene (F2) mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 # <50 # <50>C16‐C34 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 210 <100 <100 <100 <100 # <100 # <100>C34‐C40 mg/kg 100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 # <100 # <100C6 ‐ C9 mg/kg 20 1000 100 65 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 # <10 # <20C10 ‐ C14 mg/kg 20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20 # <50 # <50C15 ‐ C28 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 150 <50 <50 <50 <50 # <100 # <100C29 ‐ C36 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 <50 63 <50 <50 <50 <50 # <100 # <100C10 ‐ C36 (Sum of total) mg/kg 50 10,000 10,000 1000 <50 <50 <50 210 <50 <50 <50 <50 # <50 # <100

Halogenated Phenols tetrachlorophenols mg/kg 1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Cyanide Total mg/kg 5 3500 1000 500 <5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) % 1 20 20 20 17 18 22 27 21 25 25.6 5.32 ‐ Arsenic mg/kg 2 750 200 20 9.4 6.7 12 9.2 7.2 <2 16 6.2 88.29 6 90.91 <1Barium mg/kg 10 300 66 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Beryllium mg/kg 2 150 40 20 <2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 60 30 3 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 # <1 # <0.2Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 1 750 200 1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Chromium mg/kg 5 26 22 19 22 29 21 35 30 15.38 41 15.79 <1Chromium (Trivalent) mg/kg 5 400 26 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Cobalt mg/kg 5 1000 170 170 6 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Copper mg/kg 5 7500 2000 60 21 18 15 20 17 12 15 23 42.11 58 117.81 <1Lead mg/kg 5 5000 1200 300 20 <5 120 64 14 13 6.4 16 85.71 39 143.61 <1Manganese mg/kg 5 10000 6000 500 130 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Mercury mg/kg 0.1 110 30 1 0.1 <0.1 0.7 0.3 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 # 0.2 # <0.1Nickel mg/kg 5 3000 600 60 10 9.8 6.4 8.3 12 5.2 11 12 8.70 22 66.67 <1Silver mg/kg 5 <5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Zinc mg/kg 5 50000 14000 200 29 18 74 86 32 33 43 30 35.62 62 36.19 <1

PAH Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.8 1.1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 5 2 1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5.8 1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 9.3 1.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # ‐ Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * mg/kg 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 9.3 1.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0 0.6 0 ‐ Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * mg/kg 0.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 9.3 1.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 0 1.2 0 ‐ Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 4.3 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.9 1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Benzo[b+j]fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 4.7 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 3.7 2.4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Indeno(1,2,3‐c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 4 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1 1.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 4.5 2.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <1Total PAHs mg/kg 0.5 200 40 5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 43 12 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 # <0.5 # <14,4‐DDE mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ a‐BHC mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Aldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 50 2 2 <0.1 ‐ ‐ <0.1 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ b‐BHC mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 50 2 2 <0.1 ‐ ‐ <0.1 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ d‐BHC mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ DDD mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ DDT mg/kg 0.05 50 2 2 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kg <0.15 ‐ ‐ <0.15 <0.15 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Dieldrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Endrin mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

RPD between BH5_0.7‐0.8 and

QC2 %


QC2A %

TRH

BTEXN

Water ug/L

Inorganics

SA EPA ILCSA EPA LLCW

SA EPA WF

OCP

Metals

ENAUKESW01493AA-X01 1 of 2

Table 1Soil Analytical Results

Bonacci Group Pitt/Franklin Street Redevelopment

[

SampleCode M16‐Ma11278 M16‐Ma11279 M16‐Ma11280 M16‐Ma11281 M16‐Ma11282 M16‐Ma11286 M16‐Ma11283 M16‐Ma11285 EM1602682‐001 M16‐Ma11284Field_ID BH1_0.5‐0.6 BH1_0.65‐0.8 BH3_0.6‐0.7 BH4_0.15‐0.2 BH5_0.2‐0.3 BH5_0.3‐0.4 BH5_0.7‐0.8 QC2 QC2A QC1Sample_Depth_Range (m) 0.5‐0.6 0.65‐0.8 0.6‐0.7 0.15‐0.2 0.2‐0.3 0.3‐0.4 0.7‐0.8Sampled_Date 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016 10/03/2016SampleComments Fill Natural Fill Fill Fill Fill Natural Trip Blank

Chem_Group ChemName Units LOR


QC2 %


QC2A %

Water ug/LSA EPA ILCSA EPA LLCW

SA EPA WF

Endrin aldehyde mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Endrin ketone mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ g‐BHC (Lindane) mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Heptachlor mg/kg 0.05 50 2 2 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ <0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Toxaphene mg/kg 1 <1 ‐ ‐ <1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Azinophos methyl mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Bolstar (Sulprofos) mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Chlorpyrifos mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Demeton‐O mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Diazinon mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Disulfoton mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Ethion mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Ethoprop mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Fensulfothion mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Fenthion mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Merphos mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Methyl parathion mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Mevinphos (Phosdrin) mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Naled (Dibrom) mg/kg 0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Phorate mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Ronnel mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Trichloronate mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Tokuthion mg/kg 0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ <0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,4,5‐trichlorophenol mg/kg 1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,4,6‐trichlorophenol mg/kg 1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,4‐dichlorophenol mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,4‐dimethylphenol mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,4‐dinitrophenol mg/kg 5 <5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,6‐dichlorophenol mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2‐chlorophenol mg/kg 0.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2‐methylphenol mg/kg 0.2 <0.2 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2‐nitrophenol mg/kg 1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3‐&4‐methylphenol mg/kg 0.4 <0.4 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,6‐Dinitro‐2‐methylphenol mg/kg 5 <5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4,6‐Dinitro‐o‐cyclohexyl phenol mg/kg 20 <20 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4‐chloro‐3‐methylphenol mg/kg 1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4‐nitrophenol mg/kg 5 <5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Dinoseb mg/kg 20 <20 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Pentachlorophenol mg/kg 1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Phenol mg/kg 0.5 50000 17000 0.5 <0.5 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Phenols (Total Halogenated) mg/kg 1 <1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Phenols (Total Non Halogenated) mg/kg 20 <20 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Arochlor 1221 mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Aroclor 1016 mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Aroclor 1232 mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Aroclor 1242 mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Aroclor 1248 mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Aroclor 1254 mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Aroclor 1260 mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PCBs (Sum of total) mg/kg 0.1 50 2 2 <0.1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

VHC Tetrachloroethene mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ NotesBH = Borehole soil sample; QC = Quality controlLOR = limit of reporting"‐" = analytes not requestedRPD = Relative percent difference

ResultAdopted GuidelinesSA EPA (2013) Standard for the production and use of waste derived fill

Polychlorinated Biphenyls

Phenol

OPP

ENAUKESW01493AA-X01 2 of 2

Attachment F - Laboratory certificates of analysis and chain of custody documentation

ABN – 50 005 085 521 e.mail : [email protected] web : www.eurofins.com.au

MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne3-5 Kingston Town CloseOakleigh Vic 3166Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271

SydneySydneySydneySydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217

BrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794

Environmental LaboratoryAir AnalysisWater AnalysisSoil Contamination Analysis

NATA AccreditationStack Emission Sampling & AnalysisTrade Waste Sampling & AnalysisGroundwater Sampling & Analysis

38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience

Sample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt Advice

Company name: Coffey Environments Pty Ltd SACoffey Environments Pty Ltd SACoffey Environments Pty Ltd SACoffey Environments Pty Ltd SA

Contact name: Felicia MellorsProject name: BONACCI PITT ST CONTAMINATION TESTINGProject ID: ENAUKESW0493AACOC number: Not providedTurn around time: 5 DayDate/Time received: Mar 11, 2016 8:45 AMEurofins | mgt reference: 492595492595492595492595

Sample informationSample informationSample informationSample information

☑ A detailed list of analytes logged into our LIMS, is included in the attached summary table.

☑ Sample Temperature of a random sample selected from the batch as recorded by Eurofins | mgtSample Receipt : 17.4 degrees Celsius.

☑ All samples have been received as described on the above COC.

☑ COC has been completed correctly.

☑ Attempt to chill was evident.

☑ Appropriately preserved sample containers have been used.

☑ All samples were received in good condition.

☑ Samples have been provided with adequate time to commence analysis in accordance with therelevant holding times.

☑ Appropriate sample containers have been used.

☑ Sample containers for volatile analysis received with zero headspace.

☒ Some samples have been subcontracted.

N/A Custody Seals intact (if used).

Contact notesContact notesContact notesContact notes

If you have any questions with respect to these samples please contact:

Onur Mehmet on Phone : (+61) (3) 8564 5026 or by e.mail: [email protected]

Results will be delivered electronically via e.mail to Felicia Mellors - [email protected].

.Company Name: Coffey Environments Pty Ltd SA Order No.: Received: Mar 11, 2016 8:45 AMAddress: Worldpark 33 Richmond Rd Report #: 492595 Due: Mar 21, 2016

Keswick Phone: 08 8375 4400 Priority: 5 DaySA 5035 Fax: 08 8375 4499 Contact Name: Felicia Mellors

Project Name: BONACCI PITT ST CONTAMINATION TESTINGProject ID: ENAUKESW0493AA

Eurofins | mgt Client Manager: Onur Mehmet

Sample Detail

HO

LD

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

SA

Waste S

creen

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7 (filtered metals)

Laboratory where analysis is conducted

Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X X X

Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217

Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794

External Laboratory

Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime

Matrix LAB ID

BH1_0.5-0.6 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11278 X X

BH1_0.65-0.8 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11279 X X

BH3_0.6-0.7 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11280 X X

BH4_0.15-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11281 X X X


BH5_0.7-0.8 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11283 X X

QC1 Mar 10, 2016 Water M16-Ma11284 X

QC2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11285 X X

BH5_0.3-0.4 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11286 X X


MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne3-5 Kingston Town CloseOakleigh VIC 3166Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271



Company Name: Coffey Environments Pty Ltd SA Order No.: Received: Mar 11, 2016 8:45 AMAddress: Worldpark 33 Richmond Rd Report #: 492595 Due: Mar 21, 2016




Sample Detail

HO

LD

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

SA

Waste S

creen

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7 (filtered metals)





External Laboratory

BH1_0.15-0.25 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11287 X

BH1_1.4-1.5 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11288 X

BH2_0-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11289 X

BH3_0.1-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11290 X

BH3_0.7-0.75 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11291 X

BH5_0-0.1 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11292 X

BH5_0.1-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11293 X

BH5_0.5-0.6 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11294 X

BH5_1.4-1.5 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11295 X





Certificate of Analysis

Coffey Environments Pty Ltd SA

Worldpark 33 Richmond Rd

Keswick

SA 5035

Attention: Felicia Mellors

Report 492595-S

Project name BONACCI PITT ST CONTAMINATION TESTING

Project ID ENAUKESW0493AA

Received Date Mar 11, 2016

Client Sample ID BH1_0.5-0.6 BH1_0.65-0.8 BH3_0.6-0.7 BH4_0.15-0.2

Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-Ma11278 M16-Ma11279 M16-Ma11280 M16-Ma11281

Date Sampled Mar 10, 2016 Mar 10, 2016 Mar 10, 2016 Mar 10, 2016

Test/Reference LOR Unit

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions

TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 150

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 63

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 210

BTEX

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 77 64 50 65

Volatile Organics

Tetrachloroethene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 9.3

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 0.6 0.6 9.3

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 1.2 1.2 9.3

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.8

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 3.8

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 5.8

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 4.7

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 5.0

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 4.3

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 3.9

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 1.7

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 3.7

Date Reported: Mar 21, 2016

Eurofins | mgt 2-5 Kingston Town Close, Oakleigh, Victoria, Australia, 3166

ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 8564 5000 Facsimile: +61 3 8564 5090

Page 1 of 21

Report Number: 492595-S

NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 1254

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.The results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.







Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 4.0

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 1.0

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 4.5

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 43

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 97 81 98 93

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 99 75 91 82

Organochlorine Pesticides

Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - < 0.1

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - < 0.05

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 - - < 1

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 99 - - 126

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 85 - - 98

Organophosphorous Pesticides

Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Ethion 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Merphos 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Methyl azinphos 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Naled 0.5 mg/kg - - - < 0.5




Page 2 of 21








Phorate 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg - - - < 0.2

Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % - - - 97


Aroclor-1016 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1221 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1232 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1242 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1248 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1254 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Aroclor-1260 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Total PCB* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 99 - - -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 85 - - -

Phenols (Halogenated)

2-Chlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

2.4-Dichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

2.6-Dichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Pentachlorophenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Tetrachlorophenols - Total 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Total Halogenated Phenol* 1 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Phenols (non-Halogenated)

2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-dinitrophenol 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

2-Nitrophenol 1.0 mg/kg < 1 - - -

2.4-Dimethylphenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

2.4-Dinitrophenol 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 - - -

4-Nitrophenol 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

Dinoseb 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

Phenol 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

Total Non-Halogenated Phenol* 20 mg/kg < 20 - - -

Phenol-d6 (surr.) 1 % 92 - - -


TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 210

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100

Chromium (hexavalent) 1 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Cyanide (total) 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

Chromium (trivalent) 5 mg/kg 26 - - -

% Moisture 1 % 20 20 20 17




Page 3 of 21







Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 9.4 6.7 12 9.2

Barium 10 mg/kg 66 - - -

Beryllium 2 mg/kg < 2 - - -

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4

Chromium 5 mg/kg 26 22 19 22

Cobalt 5 mg/kg 6.0 - - -

Copper 5 mg/kg 21 18 15 20

Lead 5 mg/kg 20 < 5 120 64

Manganese 5 mg/kg 130 - - -

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 < 0.1 0.7 0.3

Nickel 5 mg/kg 10 9.8 6.4 8.3

Silver 5 mg/kg < 5 - - -

Zinc 5 mg/kg 29 18 74 86

Client Sample ID BH5_0.2-0.3 BH5_0.7-0.8 QC2 BH5_0.3-0.4






TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50

BTEX

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 54 63 60 52


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50


Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.3 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.6 0.6 0.6 0.6

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.8 1.2 1.2 1.2

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg 1.1 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg 0.7 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5




Page 4 of 21








Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg 0.7 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg 0.7 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg 1.0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg 2.4 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 0.7 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg 2.2 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg 12 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 77 91 90 92

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 70 87 83 81


Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - -

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Methoxychlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - - -

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 - - -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 128 - - -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 91 - - -


Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -




Page 5 of 21








Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Methyl azinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Naled 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - -

Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - -

Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 73 - - -


TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100

% Moisture 1 % 18 27 21 22

Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 7.2 16 6.2 < 2

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4

Chromium 5 mg/kg 29 35 30 21

Copper 5 mg/kg 17 15 23 12

Lead 5 mg/kg 14 6.4 16 13

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.1

Nickel 5 mg/kg 12 11 12 5.2

Zinc 5 mg/kg 32 43 30 33




Page 6 of 21


Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results (regarding both quality and NATA accreditation).

If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.

Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time

Eurofins | mgt Suite B7 (filtered metals)

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 14 Day

- Method: TRH C6-C36 - LTM-ORG-2010

BTEX Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 14 Day




Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 14 Day

- Method: USEPA 8270 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons



SA Waste Screen

Volatile Organics Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 7 Day

- Method: USEPA 8260 - MGT 350A Volatile Organics by GCMS

Organochlorine Pesticides Melbourne Mar 17, 2016 14 Day

- Method: USEPA 8081 Organochlorine Pesticides

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Melbourne Mar 17, 2016 28 Day

- Method: USEPA 8082 Polychlorinated Biphenyls

Phenols (Halogenated) Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 14 Day

- Method: USEPA 8270 Phenols

Phenols (non-Halogenated) Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 14 Day

- Method: USEPA 8270 Phenols

Chromium (hexavalent) Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 28 Day

- Method: APHA 3500-Cr Hexavalent Chromium- (Extraction:- USEPA3060)

Cyanide (total) Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 14 Day

- Method: LTM-INO-4020 Total Free WAD Cyanide by CFA

SA Waste Metals : Metals M13SA Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 28 Day

- Method: LTM-MET-3030 by ICP-OES (hydride ICP-OES for Mercury)

Eurofins | mgt Suite B14

Organophosphorous Pesticides Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 14 Day

- Method: USEPA 8270 Organophosphorus Pesticides

% Moisture Melbourne Mar 11, 2016 14 Day

- Method: LTM-GEN-7080 Moisture

Eurofins | mgt Suite B7

Metals M8 Melbourne Mar 15, 2016 28 Day

- Method: LTM-MET-3030 by ICP-OES (hydride ICP-OES for Mercury)




Page 7 of 21






Sample Detail

HO

LD

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

SA

Waste S

creen

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7 (filtered metals)





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID

BH1_0.5-0.6 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11278 X X

BH1_0.65-0.8 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11279 X X

BH3_0.6-0.7 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11280 X X



BH5_0.7-0.8 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11283 X X

QC1 Mar 10, 2016 Water M16-Ma11284 X

QC2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11285 X X

BH5_0.3-0.4 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11286 X X





Date Reported:Mar 21, 2016



Page 8 of 21






Sample Detail

HO

LD

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

SA

Waste S

creen

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7 (filtered metals)





External Laboratory

BH1_0.15-0.25 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11287 X

BH1_1.4-1.5 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11288 X

BH2_0-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11289 X

BH3_0.1-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11290 X

BH3_0.7-0.75 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11291 X

BH5_0-0.1 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11292 X

BH5_0.1-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11293 X

BH5_0.5-0.6 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11294 X

BH5_1.4-1.5 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11295 X








Page 9 of 21


Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary

General

Holding Times

Units

Terms

QC - Acceptance Criteria

QC Data General Comments

1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on

request.

2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.

3. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.

4. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries.

5. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.

6. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis. 7. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.

Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).

For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample

Receipt Advice.

If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.

Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.

**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD

mg/kg: milligrams per Kilogram mg/l: milligrams per litre

ug/l: micrograms per litre ppm: Parts per million

ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage

org/100ml: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units

MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres

Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.

LOR Limit of Reporting.

SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.

RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.

LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery

CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery

Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands.

In the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.

Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.

Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.

Batch Duplicate A second piece of analysis from a sample outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis.

Batch SPIKE Spike recovery reported on a sample from outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis.

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

APHA American Public Health Association

ASLP Australian Standard Leaching Procedure (Eurofins | mgt uses NATA accredited in-house method LTM-GEN-7010)

TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

COC Chain of Custody

SRA Sample Receipt Advice

CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report

NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within

TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient

RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:

Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit

Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%

Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%

Surrogate Recoveries : Recoveries must lie between 50-150% - Phenols 20-130%.

1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within

the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.

2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent

and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.

3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.

4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.

5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported

in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.

6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.

Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.

7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.

8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS.

9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.

10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.




Page 10 of 21


Quality Control Results

Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits

PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank


TRH C6-C9 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass




Method Blank

BTEX

Benzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Toluene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

m&p-Xylenes mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

o-Xylene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Xylenes - Total mg/kg < 0.3 0.3 Pass

Method Blank

Volatile Organics

Tetrachloroethene mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Method Blank


Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass


Method Blank


Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Method Blank


Chlordanes - Total mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

4.4'-DDD mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDE mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDT mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

a-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Aldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

b-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

d-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Dieldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endosulfan I mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endosulfan II mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass




Page 11 of 21



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endrin aldehyde mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endrin ketone mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Heptachlor mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Methoxychlor mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Toxaphene mg/kg < 1 1 Pass

Method Blank


Bolstar mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorpyrifos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Demeton-O mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Diazinon mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Dichlorvos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Disulfoton mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethoprop mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fenitrothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fensulfothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fenthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Merphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Methyl azinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Methyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Mevinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Naled mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Phorate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ronnel mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Tokuthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Trichloronate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Method Blank


Aroclor-1016 mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass







Total PCB* mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Method Blank


2-Chlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

2.4-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

2.4.5-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 1 1.0 Pass

2.4.6-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 1 1.0 Pass

2.6-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg < 1 1.0 Pass

Pentachlorophenol mg/kg < 1 1.0 Pass

Tetrachlorophenols - Total mg/kg < 1 1.0 Pass

Method Blank





Page 12 of 21



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-dinitrophenol mg/kg < 20 20 Pass

2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

2-Nitrophenol mg/kg < 1 1.0 Pass

2.4-Dimethylphenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

2.4-Dinitrophenol mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass

4-Nitrophenol mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Dinoseb mg/kg < 20 20 Pass

Phenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Method Blank


TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass

TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass

TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass

Method Blank

Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg < 1 1 Pass

Cyanide (total) mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Method Blank

Heavy Metals

Arsenic mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Barium mg/kg < 10 10 Pass

Beryllium mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Cadmium mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass

Chromium mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Cobalt mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Copper mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Lead mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Manganese mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Mercury mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Nickel mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Silver mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Zinc mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


TRH C6-C9 % 130 70-130 Pass

TRH C10-C14 % 76 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

BTEX

Benzene % 109 70-130 Pass

Toluene % 103 70-130 Pass

Ethylbenzene % 100 70-130 Pass

m&p-Xylenes % 104 70-130 Pass

Xylenes - Total % 104 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Naphthalene % 85 70-130 Pass

TRH C6-C10 % 119 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Acenaphthene % 95 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene % 106 70-130 Pass

Anthracene % 107 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene % 101 70-130 Pass




Page 13 of 21



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Benzo(a)pyrene % 103 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene % 113 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 71 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene % 124 70-130 Pass

Chrysene % 92 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 78 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene % 103 70-130 Pass

Fluorene % 100 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 72 70-130 Pass


Phenanthrene % 99 70-130 Pass

Pyrene % 98 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


4.4'-DDD % 117 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE % 124 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT % 73 70-130 Pass

a-BHC % 109 70-130 Pass

Aldrin % 115 70-130 Pass

b-BHC % 107 70-130 Pass

d-BHC % 116 70-130 Pass

Dieldrin % 111 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan I % 117 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan II % 117 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate % 117 70-130 Pass

Endrin % 108 70-130 Pass

Endrin aldehyde % 106 70-130 Pass

Endrin ketone % 104 70-130 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) % 107 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor % 118 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide % 116 70-130 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene % 106 70-130 Pass

Methoxychlor % 86 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Diazinon % 101 70-130 Pass

Ethion % 99 70-130 Pass

Fenitrothion % 103 70-130 Pass

Methyl parathion % 92 70-130 Pass

Mevinphos % 80 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Aroclor-1260 % 88 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


2-Chlorophenol % 103 30-130 Pass

2.4-Dichlorophenol % 98 30-130 Pass

2.4.5-Trichlorophenol % 96 30-130 Pass

2.4.6-Trichlorophenol % 79 30-130 Pass

2.6-Dichlorophenol % 93 30-130 Pass

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol % 106 30-130 Pass

Pentachlorophenol % 38 30-130 Pass

Tetrachlorophenols - Total % 68 30-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery




Page 14 of 21



PassLimits

QualifyingCode


2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-dinitrophenol % 71 30-130 Pass

2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol % 69 30-130 Pass

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) % 96 30-130 Pass

2-Nitrophenol % 112 30-130 Pass

2.4-Dimethylphenol % 94 30-130 Pass

2.4-Dinitrophenol % 36 30-130 Pass

3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) % 102 30-130 Pass

4-Nitrophenol % 95 30-130 Pass

Dinoseb % 77 30-130 Pass

Phenol % 100 30-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


TRH >C10-C16 % 85 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

Chromium (hexavalent) % 100 70-130 Pass

Cyanide (total) % 100 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

Heavy Metals

Arsenic % 94 80-120 Pass

Barium % 105 80-120 Pass

Beryllium % 105 80-120 Pass

Cadmium % 102 80-120 Pass

Chromium % 105 80-120 Pass

Cobalt % 106 80-120 Pass

Copper % 110 80-120 Pass

Lead % 108 80-120 Pass

Manganese % 102 80-120 Pass

Mercury % 113 75-125 Pass

Nickel % 106 80-120 Pass

Silver % 104 80-120 Pass

Zinc % 95 80-120 Pass

Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance

LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1

TRH C6-C9 M16-Ma11537 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass


Spike - % Recovery

BTEX Result 1

Benzene M16-Ma11537 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Toluene M16-Ma11537 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

Ethylbenzene M16-Ma11537 NCP % 87 70-130 Pass

m&p-Xylenes M16-Ma11537 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

o-Xylene M16-Ma11537 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass

Xylenes - Total M16-Ma11537 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Naphthalene M16-Ma11537 NCP % 80 70-130 Pass


Spike - % Recovery

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1

4.4'-DDD M16-Ma12732 NCP % 121 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE M16-Ma12732 NCP % 110 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT M16-Ma12732 NCP % 111 70-130 Pass




Page 15 of 21



LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

a-BHC M16-Ma12732 NCP % 115 70-130 Pass

Aldrin M16-Ma12732 NCP % 122 70-130 Pass

b-BHC M16-Ma12732 NCP % 111 70-130 Pass

d-BHC M16-Ma12732 NCP % 124 70-130 Pass

Dieldrin M16-Ma12732 NCP % 118 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan I M16-Ma12732 NCP % 123 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan II M16-Ma12732 NCP % 125 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate M16-Ma12732 NCP % 110 70-130 Pass

Endrin M16-Ma12732 NCP % 118 70-130 Pass

Endrin aldehyde M16-Ma12732 NCP % 121 70-130 Pass

Endrin ketone M16-Ma12732 NCP % 102 70-130 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) M16-Ma12732 NCP % 116 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor M16-Ma12732 NCP % 127 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide M16-Ma12732 NCP % 121 70-130 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene M16-Ma12732 NCP % 113 70-130 Pass

Methoxychlor M16-Ma12732 NCP % 126 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Result 1

Aroclor-1260 M16-Ma08742 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Phenols (non-Halogenated) Result 1

2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-dinitrophenol M16-Ma12050 NCP % 42 30-130 Pass

2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol M16-Ma12050 NCP % 57 30-130 Pass

2.4-Dinitrophenol M16-Ma12050 NCP % 107 30-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


TRH >C10-C16 M16-Ma12371 NCP % 107 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Result 1

Chromium (hexavalent) M16-Ma13782 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass

Cyanide (total) S16-Ma10660 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1

Acenaphthene M16-Ma11282 CP % 98 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene M16-Ma11282 CP % 95 70-130 Pass

Anthracene M16-Ma11282 CP % 91 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M16-Ma11282 CP % 89 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M16-Ma11282 CP % 77 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-Ma11282 CP % 99 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-Ma11282 CP % 93 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-Ma11282 CP % 72 70-130 Pass

Chrysene M16-Ma11282 CP % 90 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-Ma11282 CP % 113 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene M16-Ma11282 CP % 70 70-130 Pass

Fluorene M16-Ma11282 CP % 95 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-Ma11282 CP % 102 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene M16-Ma11282 CP % 99 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene M16-Ma11282 CP % 75 70-130 Pass

Pyrene M16-Ma11282 CP % 74 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Organophosphorous Pesticides Result 1

Diazinon M16-Ma11282 CP % 125 70-130 Pass

Ethion M16-Ma11282 CP % 109 70-130 Pass

Fenitrothion M16-Ma11282 CP % 110 70-130 Pass




Page 16 of 21



LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Methyl parathion M16-Ma11282 CP % 101 70-130 Pass

Mevinphos M16-Ma11282 CP % 72 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Phenols (Halogenated) Result 1

2-Chlorophenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 102 30-130 Pass

2.4-Dichlorophenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 102 30-130 Pass

2.4.5-Trichlorophenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 100 30-130 Pass

2.4.6-Trichlorophenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 97 30-130 Pass

2.6-Dichlorophenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 99 30-130 Pass

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 100 30-130 Pass

Pentachlorophenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 58 30-130 Pass

Tetrachlorophenols - Total M16-Ma11282 CP % 97 30-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Phenols (non-Halogenated) Result 1

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) M16-Ma11282 CP % 109 30-130 Pass

2-Nitrophenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 91 30-130 Pass

2.4-Dimethylphenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 88 30-130 Pass

3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) M16-Ma11282 CP % 104 30-130 Pass

4-Nitrophenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 88 30-130 Pass

Dinoseb M16-Ma11282 CP % 30 30-130 Pass

Phenol M16-Ma11282 CP % 105 30-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Heavy Metals Result 1

Arsenic M16-Ma11285 CP % 90 75-125 Pass

Barium M16-Ma11285 CP % 87 75-125 Pass

Beryllium M16-Ma11285 CP % 87 75-125 Pass

Cadmium M16-Ma11285 CP % 89 75-125 Pass

Chromium M16-Ma11285 CP % 86 75-125 Pass

Cobalt M16-Ma11285 CP % 78 75-125 Pass

Copper M16-Ma11285 CP % 107 75-125 Pass

Lead M16-Ma11285 CP % 89 75-125 Pass

Manganese M16-Ma11285 CP % 110 75-125 Pass

Mercury M16-Ma11285 CP % 87 70-130 Pass

Nickel M16-Ma11285 CP % 78 75-125 Pass

Silver M16-Ma11285 CP % 85 75-125 Pass

Zinc M16-Ma11285 CP % 79 75-125 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate

Volatile Organics Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Tetrachloroethene M16-Ma11543 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Chlordanes - Total M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDD M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDE M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDT M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

a-BHC M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Aldrin M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

b-BHC M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

d-BHC M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Dieldrin M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan I M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan II M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan sulphate M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass




Page 17 of 21


Duplicate

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Endrin M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin aldehyde M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin ketone M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor epoxide M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Hexachlorobenzene M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Methoxychlor M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Toxaphene M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Aroclor-1016 M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass







Total PCB* M16-Ma11086 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Chromium (hexavalent) M16-Ma12675 NCP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Cyanide (total) M16-Ma12679 NCP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD

TRH C6-C9 M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass


TRH C15-C28 M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 150 250 52 30% Fail Q15

TRH C29-C36 M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 63 260 120 30% Fail Q15

Duplicate

BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Benzene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Toluene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Ethylbenzene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

m&p-Xylenes M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

o-Xylene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Xylenes - Total M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


Naphthalene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass


Duplicate

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Acenaphthene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 0.8 1.5 66 30% Fail Q15

Anthracene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 0.6 29 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 3.8 3.2 17 30% Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 5.8 6.8 16 30% Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 4.7 4.4 7.0 30% Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 5.0 7.7 43 30% Fail Q15

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 4.3 4.7 11 30% Pass

Chrysene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 3.9 3.5 9.0 30% Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 1.7 2.6 41 30% Fail Q15

Fluoranthene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 3.7 3.7 <1 30% Pass




Page 18 of 21


Duplicate


Fluorene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 4.0 6.2 43 30% Fail Q15

Naphthalene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 1.0 1.0 <1 30% Pass

Pyrene M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 4.5 4.4 2.0 30% Pass

Duplicate

Organophosphorous Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Bolstar M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorpyrifos M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Demeton-O M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Diazinon M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Dichlorvos M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Disulfoton M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethion M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethoprop M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fenitrothion M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fensulfothion M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fenthion M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Merphos M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Methyl azinphos M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Methyl parathion M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Mevinphos M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Naled M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Phorate M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ronnel M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Tokuthion M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Trichloronate M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Phenols (Halogenated) Result 1 Result 2 RPD

2-Chlorophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

2.4-Dichlorophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

2.4.5-Trichlorophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

2.4.6-Trichlorophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

2.6-Dichlorophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Pentachlorophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Tetrachlorophenols - Total M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Phenols (non-Halogenated) Result 1 Result 2 RPD

2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-dinitrophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass

2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

2-Nitrophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

2.4-Dimethylphenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

2.4-Dinitrophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass

4-Nitrophenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

Dinoseb M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass

Phenol M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


TRH >C10-C16 M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass

TRH >C16-C34 M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg 210 480 78 30% Fail Q15

TRH >C34-C40 M16-Ma11281 CP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass




Page 19 of 21


Duplicate

Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Mercury M16-Ma11283 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


Arsenic M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg 6.2 7.9 23 30% Pass

Barium M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg 74 75 1.0 30% Pass

Beryllium M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Cadmium M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass

Chromium M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg 30 30 3.0 30% Pass

Cobalt M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg 5.7 6.4 12 30% Pass

Copper M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg 23 23 2.0 30% Pass

Lead M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg 16 18 9.0 30% Pass

Manganese M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg 140 140 1.0 30% Pass

Mercury M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Nickel M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg 12 12 1.0 30% Pass

Silver M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg < 5 < 5 <1 30% Pass

Zinc M16-Ma11285 CP mg/kg 30 34 11 30% Pass

Duplicate

Result 1 Result 2 RPD

% Moisture M16-Ma11286 CP % 22 22 2.0 30% Pass




Page 20 of 21


Comments

Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A

Attempt to Chill was evident Yes

Sample correctly preserved Yes

Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes

Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes

Samples received within HoldingTime Yes

Some samples have been subcontracted No

Qualifier Codes/Comments

Code Description

N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).

N02

Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.

N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.

N07Please note:- These two PAH isomers closely co-elute using the most contemporary analytical methods and both the reported concentration (and the TEQ) apply specifically tothe total of the two co-eluting PAHs

Q15 The RPD reported passes Eurofins | mgt's QC - Acceptance Criteria as defined in the Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary page of this report.

Authorised By

Onur Mehmet Analytical Services Manager

Emily Rosenberg Senior Analyst-Metal (VIC)

Harry Bacalis Senior Analyst-Volatile (VIC)

Huong Le Senior Analyst-Inorganic (VIC)

Mele Singh Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC)

Glenn Jackson

National Operations Manager

- Indicates Not Requested

* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service

Uncertainty data is available on requestEurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but notlimited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.




Page 21 of 21


Certificate of Analysis

Coffey Environments Pty Ltd SA

Worldpark 33 Richmond Rd

Keswick

SA 5035

Attention: Felicia Mellors

Report 492595-W

Project name BONACCI PITT ST CONTAMINATION TESTING

Project ID ENAUKESW0493AA

Received Date Mar 11, 2016

Client Sample ID QC1

Sample Matrix Water

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-Ma11284

Date Sampled Mar 10, 2016



TRH C6-C9 0.02 mg/L < 0.02

TRH C10-C14 0.05 mg/L < 0.05

TRH C15-C28 0.1 mg/L < 0.1

TRH C29-C36 0.1 mg/L < 0.1

TRH C10-36 (Total) 0.1 mg/L < 0.1

BTEX

Benzene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Toluene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Ethylbenzene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

m&p-Xylenes 0.002 mg/L < 0.002

o-Xylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Xylenes - Total 0.003 mg/L < 0.003

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 72


NaphthaleneN02 0.01 mg/L < 0.01

TRH C6-C10 0.02 mg/L < 0.02

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 0.02 mg/L < 0.02

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 0.05 mg/L < 0.05


Acenaphthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Acenaphthylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benz(a)anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Chrysene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Fluoranthene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Fluorene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Naphthalene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Phenanthrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Pyrene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001




Page 1 of 10

Report Number: 492595-W

NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 1254

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.The results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.

Client Sample ID QC1

Sample Matrix Water

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. M16-Ma11284

Date Sampled Mar 10, 2016



Total PAH* 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 62

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 80


TRH >C10-C16 0.05 mg/L < 0.05

TRH >C16-C34 0.1 mg/L < 0.1

TRH >C34-C40 0.1 mg/L < 0.1

Heavy Metals

Arsenic (filtered) 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Cadmium (filtered) 0.0002 mg/L < 0.0002

Chromium (filtered) 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Copper (filtered) 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Lead (filtered) 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Mercury (filtered) 0.0001 mg/L < 0.0001

Nickel (filtered) 0.001 mg/L < 0.001

Zinc (filtered) 0.001 mg/L < 0.001




Page 2 of 10


Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results (regarding both quality and NATA accreditation).

If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.

Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time

Eurofins | mgt Suite B7 (filtered metals)



BTEX Melbourne Mar 11, 2016 14 Day




Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Melbourne Mar 16, 2016 7 Day

- Method: USEPA 8270 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons



Metals M8 filtered Melbourne Mar 11, 2016 28 Day

- Method: LTM-MET-3040 Metals in Waters by ICP-MS




Page 3 of 10






Sample Detail

HO

LD

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

SA

Waste S

creen

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7 (filtered metals)





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID

BH1_0.5-0.6 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11278 X X

BH1_0.65-0.8 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11279 X X

BH3_0.6-0.7 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11280 X X



BH5_0.7-0.8 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11283 X X

QC1 Mar 10, 2016 Water M16-Ma11284 X

QC2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11285 X X

BH5_0.3-0.4 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11286 X X








Page 4 of 10






Sample Detail

HO

LD

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

SA

Waste S

creen

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7 (filtered metals)





External Laboratory

BH1_0.15-0.25 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11287 X

BH1_1.4-1.5 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11288 X

BH2_0-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11289 X

BH3_0.1-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11290 X

BH3_0.7-0.75 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11291 X

BH5_0-0.1 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11292 X

BH5_0.1-0.2 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11293 X

BH5_0.5-0.6 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11294 X

BH5_1.4-1.5 Mar 10, 2016 Soil M16-Ma11295 X








Page 5 of 10


Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary

General

Holding Times

Units

Terms

QC - Acceptance Criteria

QC Data General Comments

1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on

request.

2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.

3. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.

4. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries.

5. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.

6. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis. 7. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.

Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).

For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample

Receipt Advice.

If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.

Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.

**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD

mg/kg: milligrams per Kilogram mg/l: milligrams per litre

ug/l: micrograms per litre ppm: Parts per million

ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage

org/100ml: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units

MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres

Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.

LOR Limit of Reporting.

SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.

RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.

LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery

CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery

Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands.

In the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.

Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.

Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.

Batch Duplicate A second piece of analysis from a sample outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis.

Batch SPIKE Spike recovery reported on a sample from outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis.

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

APHA American Public Health Association

ASLP Australian Standard Leaching Procedure (Eurofins | mgt uses NATA accredited in-house method LTM-GEN-7010)

TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

COC Chain of Custody

SRA Sample Receipt Advice

CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report

NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within

TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient

RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:

Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit

Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%

Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%

Surrogate Recoveries : Recoveries must lie between 50-150% - Phenols 20-130%.

1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within

the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.

2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent

and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.

3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.

4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.

5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported

in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.

6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.

Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.

7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.

8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS.

9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.

10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.




Page 6 of 10


Quality Control Results


PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank


TRH C15-C28 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass

TRH C29-C36 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Method Blank


Acenaphthene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Acenaphthylene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Anthracene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Chrysene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Fluoranthene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Fluorene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Naphthalene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Phenanthrene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Pyrene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Method Blank


TRH >C10-C16 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 Pass

TRH >C16-C34 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass

TRH >C34-C40 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Method Blank

Heavy Metals

Arsenic (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Cadmium (filtered) mg/L < 0.0002 0.0002 Pass

Chromium (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Copper (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Lead (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Mercury (filtered) mg/L < 0.0001 0.0001 Pass

Nickel (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

Zinc (filtered) mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


TRH C10-C14 % 72 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Acenaphthene % 74 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene % 77 70-130 Pass

Anthracene % 76 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene % 83 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene % 90 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene % 86 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 87 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene % 77 70-130 Pass

Chrysene % 80 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 85 70-130 Pass




Page 7 of 10



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Fluoranthene % 84 70-130 Pass

Fluorene % 76 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 85 70-130 Pass


Phenanthrene % 81 70-130 Pass

Pyrene % 81 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


TRH >C10-C16 % 71 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

Heavy Metals

Arsenic (filtered) % 98 80-120 Pass

Cadmium (filtered) % 97 80-120 Pass

Chromium (filtered) % 96 80-120 Pass

Copper (filtered) % 95 80-120 Pass

Lead (filtered) % 96 80-120 Pass

Mercury (filtered) % 102 70-130 Pass

Nickel (filtered) % 95 80-120 Pass

Zinc (filtered) % 98 80-120 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery



Spike - % Recovery

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1

Acenaphthene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 75 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 75 70-130 Pass

Anthracene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 74 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 81 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 80 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 84 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 77 70-130 Pass

Chrysene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 77 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 82 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 81 70-130 Pass

Fluorene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 76 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 74 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 77 70-130 Pass

Pyrene M16-Ma10969 NCP % 81 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


TRH >C10-C16 M16-Ma11398 NCP % 82 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Heavy Metals Result 1

Arsenic (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass

Cadmium (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP % 93 70-130 Pass

Chromium (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Copper (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Lead (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP % 102 70-130 Pass

Mercury (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass

Nickel (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Zinc (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP % 93 70-130 Pass




Page 8 of 10



LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate


TRH C10-C14 M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass



Duplicate


Acenaphthene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Anthracene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Chrysene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Fluoranthene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Fluorene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Naphthalene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Pyrene M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


TRH >C10-C16 M16-Ma11284 CP mg/L < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass



Duplicate


Arsenic (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Cadmium (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP mg/L < 0.0002 < 0.0002 <1 30% Pass

Chromium (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Copper (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP mg/L 0.003 0.004 9.0 30% Pass

Lead (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Mercury (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP mg/L < 0.0001 < 0.0001 <1 30% Pass

Nickel (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass

Zinc (filtered) M16-Ma09390 NCP mg/L 0.011 0.012 6.0 30% Pass




Page 9 of 10


Comments

Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A

Attempt to Chill was evident Yes

Sample correctly preserved Yes

Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes

Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes

Samples received within HoldingTime Yes

Some samples have been subcontracted No

Qualifier Codes/Comments

Code Description

N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).

N02

Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.

N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.

N07Please note:- These two PAH isomers closely co-elute using the most contemporary analytical methods and both the reported concentration (and the TEQ) apply specifically tothe total of the two co-eluting PAHs

Authorised By

Onur Mehmet Analytical Services Manager

Emily Rosenberg Senior Analyst-Metal (VIC)

Harry Bacalis Senior Analyst-Volatile (VIC)

Mele Singh Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC)

Glenn Jackson

National Operations Manager

- Indicates Not Requested

* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service

Uncertainty data is available on requestEurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but notlimited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.




Page 10 of 10


Environmental

SAMPLE RECEIPT NOTIFICATION (SRN)Work Order : EM1602682

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneCOFFEY ENVIRONMENTS PTY LTD

: :ContactContact MS FELICIA MELLORS Bronwyn Sheen

:: AddressAddress WORLDPARK LEVEL 1, 33

RICHMOND RD

KESWICK SA 5035

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia

3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]

:: TelephoneTelephone +61 08 8375 4400 +61-3-8549 9636

:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 08 8375 4499 +61-3-8549 9601

::Project ENAUKESW01493AA Page 1 of 2

:Order number ---- :Quote number EM2014COFENV0370 (EN/077/14)

:C-O-C number ENAUKESW01493AA-002 :QC Level NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard

Site : ----

Sampler : Andrew James

DatesDate Samples Received : Issue Date : 12-Mar-201611-Mar-2016 9:30 AM

Scheduled Reporting Date: 21-Mar-2016:Client Requested Due

Date

21-Mar-2016

Delivery DetailsMode of Delivery : :Carrier Intact.Security Seal

No. of coolers/boxes : :1 Temperature 11.6°C - Ice Bricks present

: : 1 / 1Receipt Detail No. of samples received / analysed

General Comments

This report contains the following information:l

- Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances

- Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis

- Proactive Holding Time Report

- Requested Deliverables

l Sample(s) received in non-ALS container(s).l Please direct any queries related to sample condition / numbering / breakages to Client Services.l Sample Disposal - Aqueous (14 days), Solid (60 days) from date of completion of work order.

l Analytical work for this work order will be conducted at ALS Springvale.l Please refer to the Proactive Holding Time Report table below which summarises breaches of

recommended holding times that have occurred prior to samples/instructions being received at

the laboratory. The absence of this summary table indicates that all samples have been received

within the recommended holding times for the analysis requested.

R I G H T S O L U T I O N S | R I G H T P A R T N E R

:Client COFFEY ENVIRONMENTS PTY LTD

Work Order : EM1602682 Amendment 02 of 2:Page

12-Mar-2016:Issue Date

Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances

All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS, APHA, USEPA standards.

l No sample container / preservation non-compliance exists.

Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis

Some items described below may be part of a laboratory

process necessary for the execution of client requested

tasks. Packages may contain additional analyses, such

as the determination of moisture content and preparation

tasks, that are included in the package.

If no sampling time is provided, the sampling time will

default to 15:00 on the date of sampling. If no sampling

date is provided, the sampling date will be assumed by

the laboratory for processing purposes and will be shown

bracketed without a time component.

SO

IL -

EA

055

-10

3

Mois

ture

Co

nte

nt

SO

IL -

S-2

6

8 m

eta

ls/T

RH

/BT

EX

N/P

AH

EM1602682-001 [ 10-Mar-2016 ] QC2A ü ü

Matrix: SOIL

Client sample IDLaboratory sample

ID

Client sampling

date / time

Proactive Holding Time Report

Sample(s) have been received within the recommended holding times for the requested analysis.

Requested Deliverables

FELICIA MELLORS

- *AU Certificate of Analysis - NATA (COA) Email [email protected]

- *AU Interpretive QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) (QCI) Email [email protected]

- *AU QC Report - DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) - NATA (QC) Email [email protected]

- A4 - AU Sample Receipt Notification - Environmental HT (SRN) Email [email protected]

- A4 - AU Tax Invoice (INV) Email [email protected]

- Chain of Custody (CoC) (COC) Email [email protected]

- EDI Format - ENMRG (ENMRG) Email [email protected]

- EDI Format - ESDAT (ESDAT) Email [email protected]

TRACY SVINGOS

- A4 - AU Tax Invoice (INV) Email [email protected]

0 0.00 True

Environmental

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISWork Order : Page : 1 of 6EM1602682

:: LaboratoryClient COFFEY ENVIRONMENTS PTY LTD Environmental Division Melbourne

: :ContactContact MS FELICIA MELLORS Bronwyn Sheen

:: AddressAddress WORLDPARK LEVEL 1, 33 RICHMOND RD

KESWICK SA 5035

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:Telephone +61 08 8375 4400 :Telephone +61-3-8549 9636

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825

Accredited for compliance with

ISO/IEC 17025.

:Project ENAUKESW01493AA Date Samples Received : 11-Mar-2016 09:30

:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 15-Mar-2016

:C-O-C number ENAUKESW01493AA-002 Issue Date : 21-Mar-2016 14:07


Site : ----

Quote number : ----

1:No. of samples received

1:No. of samples analysed

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted.

This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:

l General Comments

l Analytical Results

l Surrogate Control Limits

Additional information pertinent to this report will be found in the following separate attachments: Quality Control Report, QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with

Quality Review and Sample Receipt Notification.

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.

Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Dilani Fernando Senior Inorganic Chemist Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC

Eric Chau Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC

Nancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist Melbourne Organics, Springvale, VIC


2 of 6:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682

ENAUKESW01493AA:Project

COFFEY ENVIRONMENTS PTY LTD

General Comments

The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house

developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.

CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.

LOR = Limit of reporting

^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting

ø = ALS is not NATA accredited for these tests.

Key :

Benzo(a)pyrene Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) is the sum total of the concentration of the eight carcinogenic PAHs multiplied by their Toxicity Equivalence Factor (TEF) relative to Benzo(a)pyrene. TEF values

are provided in brackets as follows: Benz(a)anthracene (0.1), Chrysene (0.01), Benzo(b+j) & Benzo(k)fluoranthene (0.1), Benzo(a)pyrene (1.0), Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene (0.1), Dibenz(a.h)anthracene (1.0),

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene (0.01). Less than LOR results for 'TEQ Zero' are treated as zero, for 'TEQ 1/2LOR' are treated as half the reported LOR, and for 'TEQ LOR' are treated as being equal to the reported LOR.

Note: TEQ 1/2LOR and TEQ LOR will calculate as 0.6mg/Kg and 1.2mg/Kg respectively for samples with non-detects for all of the eight TEQ PAHs.

l

3 of 6:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Analytical Results

----------------QC2AClient sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

(Matrix: SOIL)

----------------[10-Mar-2016]Client sampling date / time

--------------------------------EM1602682-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

Result Result Result Result Result

EA055: Moisture Content

25.6 ---- ---- ---- ----%1----Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES

6Arsenic ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-38-2

<1Cadmium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg17440-43-9

41Chromium ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-47-3

58Copper ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-50-8

39Lead ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57439-92-1

22Nickel ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-02-0

62Zinc ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-66-6

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS

0.2Mercury ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.17439-97-6

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons

<0.5Naphthalene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3

<0.5Acenaphthylene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8

<0.5Acenaphthene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9

<0.5Fluorene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7

<0.5Phenanthrene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8

<0.5Anthracene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7

<0.5Fluoranthene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0

<0.5Pyrene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0

<0.5Benz(a)anthracene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3

<0.5Chrysene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9

<0.5Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2 205-82-3

<0.5Benzo(k)fluoranthene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9

<0.5Benzo(a)pyrene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8

<0.5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5

<0.5Dibenz(a.h)anthracene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3

<0.5Benzo(g.h.i)perylene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2

<0.5^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

<0.5^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (zero)

0.6^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (half LOR)

1.2^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (LOR)

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

<10 ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction

4 of 6:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Analytical Results


(Matrix: SOIL)




EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Continued

<50 ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction

<100 ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction

<100 ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction

<50^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg50----C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions

<10C6 - C10 Fraction ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg10C6_C10

<10^ C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX

(F1)

---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg10C6_C10-BTEX

<50 ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg50---->C10 - C16 Fraction

<100 ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg100---->C16 - C34 Fraction

<100 ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg100---->C34 - C40 Fraction

<50^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg50---->C10 - C40 Fraction (sum)

<50^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg50---->C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene

(F2)

EP080: BTEXN

<0.2Benzene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2

<0.5Toluene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3

<0.5Ethylbenzene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4

<0.5meta- & para-Xylene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3

<0.5ortho-Xylene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6

<0.2^ ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.2----Sum of BTEX

<0.5^ Total Xylenes ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.51330-20-7

<1Naphthalene ---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg191-20-3

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates

75.7Phenol-d6 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.513127-88-3

84.22-Chlorophenol-D4 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.593951-73-6

86.32.4.6-Tribromophenol ---- ---- ---- ----%0.5118-79-6

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates

79.62-Fluorobiphenyl ---- ---- ---- ----%0.5321-60-8

118Anthracene-d10 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.51719-06-8

1304-Terphenyl-d14 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.51718-51-0

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates

88.51.2-Dichloroethane-D4 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.217060-07-0

106Toluene-D8 ---- ---- ---- ----%0.22037-26-5

5 of 6:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Analytical Results


(Matrix: SOIL)




EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates - Continued

82.74-Bromofluorobenzene ---- ---- ---- ----%0.2460-00-4

6 of 6:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Surrogate Control Limits

Recovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: SOIL

Compound CAS Number Low High

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates

Phenol-d6 13127-88-3 54 125

2-Chlorophenol-D4 93951-73-6 65 123

2.4.6-Tribromophenol 118-79-6 34 122

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates

2-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 61 125

Anthracene-d10 1719-06-8 62 130

4-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 67 133

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates

1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 51 125

Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 55 125

4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 56 124

False 3 3.00True

Environmental

QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EM1602682 Page : 1 of 7


:Contact MS FELICIA MELLORS :Contact Bronwyn Sheen

:Address WORLDPARK LEVEL 1, 33 RICHMOND RD

KESWICK SA 5035

Address : 4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

::Telephone +61 08 8375 4400 +61-3-8549 9636:Telephone

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825

Accredited for compliance with

ISO/IEC 17025.

:Project ENAUKESW01493AA Date Samples Received : 11-Mar-2016

:Order number ---- Date Analysis Commenced : 15-Mar-2016

:C-O-C number ENAUKESW01493AA-002 Issue Date : 21-Mar-2016


Site : ----

Quote number : ----

No. of samples received 1:

No. of samples analysed 1:

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted.

This Quality Control Report contains the following information:

l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits

l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

l Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories below. Electronic signing is carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.

Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Dilani Fernando Senior Inorganic Chemist Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC

Eric Chau Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics, Springvale, VIC

Nancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist Melbourne Organics, Springvale, VIC


2 of 7:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



General Comments

The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house

developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot

CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.

LOR = Limit of reporting

RPD = Relative Percentage Difference

# = Indicates failed QC

Key :

Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges

for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:

No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 394566)

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1 % 20.3 20.3 0.00 0% - 20%Anonymous EM1602652-080

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1 % 6.8 6.4 5.20 No LimitAnonymous EM1602692-008

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 396681)

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No LimitQC2A EM1602682-001

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 41 40 0.00 0% - 20%

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 22 22 0.00 0% - 50%

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 6 5 19.5 No Limit

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 58 49 18.2 0% - 50%

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 39 51 27.7 0% - 50%

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 62 64 3.52 0% - 50%

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602692-009

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 49 42 15.4 0% - 20%

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 14 12 14.3 No Limit

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 12 14 15.9 No Limit

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 33 31 6.08 No Limit

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 73 56 26.9 0% - 50%

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 188 176 6.80 0% - 20%

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 396682)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 0.1 0.00 No LimitQC2A EM1602682-001

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 0.1 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602692-009

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 394598)

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602652-045

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

3 of 7:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682





EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 394598) - continued

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602652-045

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b+j)fluoranthene 205-99-2

205-82-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602652-074

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit


205-82-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 394596)

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602607-154

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit


EP071: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.00 No Limit




EP071: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.00 No Limit

4 of 7:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682





EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 394937)



EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QC Lot: 394596)

EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 100 100 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602607-154

EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No Limit


EP071: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg 100 100 0.00 No Limit

EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602652-074



EP071: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.00 No Limit

EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QC Lot: 394937)

EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602652-044

EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602652-073

EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 394937)

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602652-044

EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3

106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.00 No LimitAnonymous EM1602652-073

EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit


106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.00 No Limit

EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.00 No Limit

5 of 7:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC

parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target

analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB)

Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 396681)

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 10121.7 mg/kg 11379

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 95.94.64 mg/kg 11587

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg <2 10343.9 mg/kg 11389

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg <5 94.232 mg/kg 11690

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg <5 89.640 mg/kg 10785

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg <2 99.355 mg/kg 11189

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg <5 98.260.8 mg/kg 11189

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 396682)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 92.72.57 mg/kg 10385

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 394598)

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 90.43 mg/kg 12080

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1003 mg/kg 13070

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1103 mg/kg 12680

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1003 mg/kg 13070

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1023 mg/kg 12565


205-82-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 85.53 mg/kg 12470

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 76.23 mg/kg 12765

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1083 mg/kg 12575

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1053 mg/kg 12680

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 86.63 mg/kg 12665

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1073 mg/kg 12870

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 91.43 mg/kg 12470

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 82.23 mg/kg 12865

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1043 mg/kg 12180

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 98.43 mg/kg 12280

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1113 mg/kg 12580

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 394596)

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 108696 mg/kg 13165

EP071: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 -------- --------

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 91.73357 mg/kg 12670

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 93.11564 mg/kg 12270


EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 11236 mg/kg 13066

6 of 7:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB)

Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QCLot: 394596)

EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 99.81116 mg/kg 13068

EP071: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 -------- --------

EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 90.24398 mg/kg 11672

EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 104169 mg/kg 13238


EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 10745 mg/kg 12864

EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 394937)

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 1062 mg/kg 12474

EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1082 mg/kg 12472


106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1144 mg/kg 13272

EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <1 98.40.5 mg/kg 13266

EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1122 mg/kg 13076

EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1122 mg/kg 12975

Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on

analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report

SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike

HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 396681)

Anonymous EM1602692-001 7440-38-2EG005T: Arsenic 10250 mg/kg 12478

7440-43-9EG005T: Cadmium 94.850 mg/kg 11684

7440-47-3EG005T: Chromium 94.950 mg/kg 12179

7440-50-8EG005T: Copper 97.750 mg/kg 12482

7439-92-1EG005T: Lead 95.250 mg/kg 12476

7440-02-0EG005T: Nickel 91.050 mg/kg 12078

7440-66-6EG005T: Zinc 92.550 mg/kg 12874

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 396682)

Anonymous EM1602692-001 7439-97-6EG035T: Mercury 95.75 mg/kg 11676

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 394598)

Anonymous EM1602652-049 83-32-9EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 88.13 mg/kg 11767

129-00-0EP075(SIM): Pyrene 1163 mg/kg 14852


Anonymous EM1602607-162 ----EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction 102696 mg/kg 12353

7 of 7:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report

SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike

HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 394596) - continued

Anonymous EM1602607-162 ----EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction 86.03357 mg/kg 12470

----EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction 86.81564 mg/kg 11864


Anonymous EM1602652-045 ----EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction 69.828 mg/kg 13142


Anonymous EM1602607-162 ----EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction 94.01116 mg/kg 12365

----EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction 84.44398 mg/kg 12167

----EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction 93.0169 mg/kg 12644


Anonymous EM1602652-045 C6_C10EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction 62.733 mg/kg 12939

EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 394937)

Anonymous EM1602652-045 71-43-2EP080: Benzene 1302 mg/kg 13650

108-88-3EP080: Toluene 1382 mg/kg 13956

True

Environmental

QA/QC Compliance Assessment to assist with Quality ReviewWork Order : EM1602682 Page : 1 of 4


:Contact MS FELICIA MELLORS Telephone : +61-3-8549 9636

:Project ENAUKESW01493AA Date Samples Received : 11-Mar-2016

Site : ---- Issue Date : 21-Mar-2016

Andrew James:Sampler No. of samples received : 1

:Order number ---- No. of samples analysed : 1

This report is automatically generated by the ALS LIMS through interpretation of the ALS Quality Control Report and several Quality Assurance parameters measured by ALS. This automated

reporting highlights any non-conformances, facilitates faster and more accurate data validation and is designed to assist internal expert and external Auditor review. Many components of this

report contribute to the overall DQO assessment and reporting for guideline compliance.

Brief method summaries and references are also provided to assist in traceability.

Summary of Outliers

Outliers : Quality Control Samples

This report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report.

l NO Method Blank value outliers occur.

l NO Duplicate outliers occur.

l NO Laboratory Control outliers occur.

l NO Matrix Spike outliers occur.

l For all regular sample matrices, NO surrogate recovery outliers occur.

Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance

l NO Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist.

Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples

l NO Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.


2 of 4:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Analysis Holding Time Compliance

Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and

should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.

Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics

14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.

If samples are identified below as having been analysed or extracted outside of recommended holding times, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting results.

This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with ALS recommended holding times (referencing USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container

provided. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.

AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EA055: Moisture Content

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA055-103)

QC2A 24-Mar-2016---- 15-Mar-2016----10-Mar-2016 ---- üEG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005T)

QC2A 06-Sep-201606-Sep-2016 18-Mar-201617-Mar-201610-Mar-2016 ü üEG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T)

QC2A 07-Apr-201607-Apr-2016 18-Mar-201617-Mar-201610-Mar-2016 ü üEP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP071)

QC2A 26-Apr-201624-Mar-2016 18-Mar-201617-Mar-201610-Mar-2016 ü üEP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP075(SIM))

QC2A 26-Apr-201624-Mar-2016 18-Mar-201617-Mar-201610-Mar-2016 ü üEP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP080)

QC2A 24-Mar-201624-Mar-2016 17-Mar-201616-Mar-201610-Mar-2016 ü ü

3 of 4:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(were) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to

the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.

Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type

ExpectedQC Regular Actual

Rate (%)Quality Control Sample Type CountEvaluationAnalytical Methods Method

Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)

NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üMoisture Content EA055-103

NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 12.50 10.002 16 üPAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM)

NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 15.38 10.002 13 üTotal Mercury by FIMS EG035T

NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üTotal Metals by ICP-AES EG005T

NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üTRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071

NEPM 2013 B3 & ALS QC Standard 10.00 10.002 20 üTRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080

Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)






Method Blanks (MB)






Matrix Spikes (MS)






4 of 4:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1602682



Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house

developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the

Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.

Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

In house: A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 103-105 degrees C.

This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Section 7.1 and Table 1 (14 day holding time).

Moisture Content EA055-103 SOIL

In house: Referenced to APHA 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010. Metals are determined following an appropriate

acid digestion of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic

spectrum based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix

matched standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)

Total Metals by ICP-AES EG005T SOIL

In house: Referenced to AS 3550, APHA 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS)

FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique. Mercury in solids are determined following an

appropriate acid digestion. Ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then

purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This

method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)

Total Mercury by FIMS EG035T SOIL

In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8015A Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and

quantified against alkane standards over the range C10 - C40.

TRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071 SOIL

In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in Selective Ion

Mode (SIM) and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is

compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 502 and 507)

PAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM) SOIL

In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 8260B Extracts are analysed by Purge and Trap, Capillary GC/MS.

Quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve.

TRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080 SOIL

Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

In house: Referenced to USEPA 200.2. Hot Block Acid Digestion 1.0g of sample is heated with Nitric and

Hydrochloric acids, then cooled. Peroxide is added and samples heated and cooled again before being filtered

and bulked to volume for analysis. Digest is appropriate for determination of selected metals in sludge,

sediments, and soils. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 202)

Hot Block Digest for metals in soils

sediments and sludges

EN69 SOIL

In house: Referenced to USEPA SW 846 - 5030A. 5g of solid is shaken with surrogate and 10mL methanol prior

to analysis by Purge and Trap - GC/MS.

Methanolic Extraction of Soils for Purge

and Trap

ORG16 SOIL

In house: Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 30mL 1:1

DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the

desired volume for analysis.

Tumbler Extraction of Solids ORG17 SOIL

results of contamination testing - sa planning...

Documents