results of the regional products survey aric bickel ioosa/cencoos

15
RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel – IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Upload: derek-eaton

Post on 19-Jan-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Reason for the survey  A snap shot of the products RAs are developing and offering  A tool for looking at what are common/complementary products between the RAs  An idea of products that may serve as examples to build off of for common national or super regional products  A chance to provide some feedback on how easily/clearly the products the RAs are creating can be found/used/understood  Future potential

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEYAric Bickel – IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Page 2: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Overview Reasons for the survey and our

methodologies A discussion of the results

Limitations General Observations Comments from the RA directors

A brief look at the short listed categories Open floor for questions and discussion

Page 3: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Reason for the survey A snap shot of the products RAs are

developing and offering A tool for looking at what are

common/complementary products between the RAs

An idea of products that may serve as examples to build off of for common national or super regional products

A chance to provide some feedback on how easily/clearly the products the RAs are creating can be found/used/understood

Future potential

Page 4: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Methodology Survey of all 11 RA websites

The creation of a categorized spreadsheet with the results

Conversations with all of the RA directors to get their feedback and additions to the spreadsheet

Page 5: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Discussion of the Results Limitations

“Under representation” of RAs that have large integrated products (usually portals)

Timeframe Exclusion of partner products Limited time with the directors (and little

input sought from the data managers/developers)

Page 6: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

The Spreadsheet

Page 7: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

General Observations Heavy in marine operations A lot of Cross-Cutting Data Portals User need focused Variance between RAs Discoverability

Page 8: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Director Comments Product that integrates all the data streams they

have Focus on products that span as many regions as

possible Integrated water quality and climatology product

seems to be among stakeholder needs(2). Rip current prediction product (i.e. something

that strongly appeals to a number of user groups) Keep clearly in mind the end users and develop

something that all of the RAs can develop a common outreach plan for

Page 9: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Director Comments Common severe weather/extreme event product

A ubiquitous issue for the RAs Support for trajectories, inundation, and

climatology products (with some detractors) Private sector competition Whether through this initiative or not, there is a

need for federal assistance in developing inundation products

Possible legal complications with inundation products

Page 10: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Short Listed Categories Inundation products

Climatologies

Model visualization/comparison

Model trajectories

[National single variable visualization]

(Others)

Page 14: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Model Trajectories ROMS trajectories Particle Trajectories Drop-a-drifter Drop-a-drifter 2

Page 15: RESULTS OF THE REGIONAL PRODUCTS SURVEY Aric Bickel  IOOSA/CeNCOOS

Questions and Discussion