retention and relapse.ppt

Upload: drneethu-salam

Post on 14-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    1/20

    Neethu SalamFinal yr(Part 1)

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    2/20

    Retention and Relapse Moyer defined retention as maintaining newly moved

    teeth in position,long enough to aid in stabilising theircorrection.

    Relapse has been defined as the loss of any correctionachieved by orthodontic treatment.

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    3/20

    Need for retention: Gingival and periodontal tissue require time post-

    treatment to reorganize

    Soft tissue pressures are likely to cause relapse if teethare placed in an unstable position

    Growth post-treatment may cause relapse

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    4/20

    Timing of Tissue Reorganization Once teeth are able to move individually from one another

    during mastication, reorganization of tissues can begin:

    PDL: 3-4 months Collagenous gingival fibers: 4-6 months

    Elastic supracrestal fibers: 1 year

    In cases of severe initial rotations: supracrestal fibrotomiesare recommended at or just before appliance removal toprevent relapse

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    5/20

    Principles of Retention Relapse potential may be predicted by evaluation of initial

    occlusion; teeth usually want to return to their originalposition; this is due to gingival fibers and unbalanced lip-

    tongue forces

    Full-time retention is required for 3-4 months to allow forreorganization of PDL

    Retention should continue for at least 12 months in non-growing patients or until growth has ceased in growingpatients

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    6/20

    Theories of retention Riedel has discussed a number of popular explanations of

    retention and relapse and the available clinical researchevidence about them.He has summerised the different

    philosophies and concepts into nine theories.The tenththeory added by Moyers as an extention to the existingtheories.

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    7/20

    Theorem 1Corrected teeth tend to return to their original position

    Due to musculature, apical bases, transseptal fibers, and bone

    morphology

    Teeth should be held in corrected positions for an extendedperiod of time to prevent relapse

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    8/20

    Theorem 2 Elimination of the cause of malocclusion will prevent

    relapse Eg: in cases of abnormal habits such as thumb

    sucking,tongue thrusting.etc. Tongue posture

    It has been stated that even after successfully completing tonguetherapy/exercises correction is not guaranteed

    Nasopharyngeal obstructionmouth breathing open bite

    In a study byGavito et al., patients who initially started with anopen bite where evaluated 10 years following retention 35%had an open bite 3 mm or more.

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    9/20

    Theorem 3Overcorrection is recommended in malocclusions

    Class II edge to edge

    Deep bite cases

    Rotated teeth

    Less chance of relapse if there has never been a rotation;should create enough space initially for tooth to erupt into

    Transseptal fibrotomy is also recommended in severe cases

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    10/20

    Theorem 4Obtaining proper occlusion is an important factor in

    maintaining corrected positions

    Overfunction of maxillary canines on mandibular canines cancause relapse in the lower incisor area

    No movement is seen from regular grinding

    Movement may occur if there is destruction of bone or a buildup of fibrous tissue (difficult to maintain tooth position)

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    11/20

    Theorem 5Reorganization of bone and adjacent tissues is required

    around newly positioned teeth

    Use a fixed or rigid appliance or an appliance the is inhibitoryand not tooth dependent

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    12/20

    Theorem 6Lower incisors are more likely to remain in good

    alignment if positioned upright over basal bone

    Perpendicular to mandibular plane

    In terms of stability, it is better to place too much lingualinclination rather than too much labial inclination

    Labial inclination is more likely to collapse due to lip pressure

    Pretreatment lower incisor proclination is associated with lesslong-term crowding; this is thought to be due to weaker labialmuscular forces

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    13/20

    Theorem 7Corrections carried out during periods of growth are

    less likely to relapse

    Litowitz found that patients which exhibited the mostgrowth during treatment demonstrated less relapse

    Post-treatment growth (esp. mandibular growth) will

    cause secondary crowding due to lower incisorretroclination

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    14/20

    Theorem 8The farther a tooth is moved, the less likely it is to

    relapse

    As a tooth moves farther from its original position anequilibrium is formed producing a more ideal occlusion

    Little evidence to support this statement

    May actually case damage (root resorption)

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    15/20

    Theorem 9Appliance therapy cannot permanently alter archform (esp. in lower arch)

    Should maintain the initial archform, as it will tend to return toits pretreatment shape

    Strang stated:

    The width as measured across from one canine to another in the

    mandibular denture is an accurate index to the mandibularbalance inherent to the individual and dictates the limits of thedenture expansion in this area of treatment

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    16/20

    Lower Incisors: Were found to be stable if proclination occurred in deep bite

    cases or if digit/lip habit was the cause of retroclined incisors

    Proclination was found to be stable if the initial cause for theretroclination is eliminated during treatment

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    17/20

    Expansion: Has been shown to be more stable (intercanine) in Class II Div II

    than Class I or Class II Div I

    This theory was refuted byLittle et alwho stated that intercanineand intermolar expansion will relapse in Class II Div II

    RPE followed by edgewise system showed good stability of upperintercanine width and upper and lower intermolar width, butpoor lower intercanine maintance 8 years post-retention

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    18/20

    Theorem 10Many treated malocclusions require permanent retaining

    devices

    This was added by Moyers

    This is true for certain malocclusions.

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    19/20

    References Profitt, Contemp. Ortho, 2007

    Graber, Orthodontics, 2005

    Gowri Shankar,Text book of orthodontics

  • 7/27/2019 Retention and Relapse.ppt

    20/20

    Thank You