rethinking the gaze: problems of apparatus, class, gender, sexuality and race
DESCRIPTION
Rethinking the Gaze: Problems of apparatus, class, gender, sexuality and race. By:Jason Grant McKahan Presentation by:Brian Ambrose. Purpose of this Discussion. To gain a clear understanding of Laura Mulvey’s gaze theory. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Rethinking the Gaze: Problems of apparatus, class, gender,
sexuality and race
By:Jason Grant McKahan
Presentation by:Brian Ambrose
Purpose of this Discussion
• To gain a clear understanding of Laura Mulvey’s gaze theory.
• To problematize gaze theory in its relation to the apparatus, class, gender, sexuality, and race
Class Outline
• Mulvey and the gaze theory (4 minutes)• Rethinking apparatus, class, and gender (6
minutes)• Exciting film clips (5 minutes)• Rethinking sexuality and race (5 minutes)• Conclusion (2 minutes)• Review and Guided Questions (3minutes)
Laura Mulvey and the Gaze Theory
• “Normal” subject formation
• Interpellates subjects as “masculine” subjects
Gaze Theory
• Notion of a single, unitary, masculine spectator
• Humanistic, masculine, heterosexual, middle-class, white male
Apparatus
• Mulvey’s arguments have become accepted practice for feminist and ideological groups
• Spectators as subjects and cinema as apparatus
• “Phallocentricism”
Rethinking the Apparatus
• Neutral access to objective truth of the world
• “Vision can be seen as a subjective and complex phenomenon vulnerable to misperception”
Rethinking the Apparatus (con’t)
• Muybridge’s zooproxiscopic films of the 1870’s
• Animal locomotion• “Human bodies” in motion!
The “Class” Conflict
• Stuart Hall~universalistic tendency of all subjects
• Marxist materialism and psychoanalytic theory are totally incongruent
• We mistake our specific Western, late capitalist class conditions for reflections of “human” nature and psychology
• One “way of seeing”
The “Class” Conflict (con’t)
• Capitalist Hollywood• Vision, desire, and subjectivity are
constructed within a sex/gender class system
Rethinking Gender
• Can psychoanalysis provide any useful examination of women?
Rethinking Gender Main Points
• Freud’s disregard for women• Identification of women who were faced
with an active and strong protagonist• “phantasy of masculinization” • Teresa de Lauretis- “…always a movement,
a subject process, a relation…”• Mary Ann Doe- “she is the image”
Spectatorship For a Female is a Game
• Female protagonist becomes controller of the look
• Female protagonist can masquerade the feminine by embodying the feminine in excess
Relevant Films
Sexuality at a “Gaze”
• Gender and sexuality need to be seen as separate categories
Pleasures for female spectators in which identification and desire intersect
• Female protagonist as the ideal woman
• A desire for a woman on screen
• Woman as active bearer of the look
A closer look at race
• Racial formation not taken into account• The gaze of non-whites has always been
explicitly political
Gaze theory and non-white female spectators
• Non-white females absent compared to white females
• Asexual servants who were to enhance the desirability of the white women
• Ex:Tillie
Conclusion
• Laura Mulvey’s gaze theory is in need of modernization
• Modification must continuously be made to her theory to keep up with the changing world around us!
Guided Questions
The notion of a single, unitary, masculine, spectator is often called _____ _______.
Human body, gaze theory,Freudian fetishism
Guided Questions
According to Mulvey, women were seen as passive and fetishized objects for an active male
subject’s gaze? T/F
Discussion/Review Question
Which problem discussed (apparatus, class, gender, sexuality, or race) do you find most significant in the clarification of the gaze theory?
Questions