rev 0 to ip3-calc-sws-03023, 'min wall thickness at r10 ... · mn te__e cb 3...
TRANSCRIPT
ALLOVLE Nuclear Engineering 'L= ALLLLVOLEMARGIN/TO LERANCE CONT&L FORM
Calculation: /PJ- 0&WC- ,-Ich5 - 0O50co?3 (Existing) Rev. 0
Marg Iin Rev. No. 0__ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __4_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(Obtain from DC)
Modification No. _ ________Rev. __
Affected Component://$ 7
Attribute: I
Tolerance Value*: 0//
Current Change: 1./0
Cumulative Change: 0
Remarks: A/e) , cA/c"&TL
- 1-75(.365'
'-5u =io (%/v -v,)= 03(0k
1r
9909210202 990915 PDR ADOCK 05000286 P FDR
DCM-2 Preparation and Control of ATTACHMENT 4.3] SRev. No. 8 Manual Calculations and Analyses (P3) Page 1 9 of 20
TABLE 3
Required Pipe Walt Thickness for Projected 2 Year Service
IDoj Leo. t dNol th J SPI SjOsBj SNPR IS _I SEMG _t. mn te__e
CB 3 10"41099-0.365 15 15000 0.054 1100 16;36 1792 18169 0.040 0.110 0.135 10
CB 9 10"-#1093 0.365 95 15000 0.054 1100 1199 1593 1788 0.032 0.110 0.135 11
CB10 10"41099 0.365 70 15000 0.054 1100 2018 2278 2408 0.049 0.110 0.135 10
SCBI11 6"-#1101 0.280 enveloped 15000 0.034 890 471 443 1361 1804 2026 0.028 0.084 0.103 13
CB 12 6"4#1094 0.280- enveloped 15000 0.034 890 471 443 1361 1804 2026 0.028 0.084 0.103 13
CB 13 4"-#1093 0.237 enveloped 15700 0.022 710 133 173 843 1016 1103 0.013 0.071 0.087 13
CB 14 6"-#1093 0.280 enveloped 15000 0.034 890 471 443 1361 1804 2026 0.028 0.084 0.103 13
CB 15 3"-#1231 0.216 7,10, 12 15000 0.017 498 83 166 581 747 830 0.009 0.065 0.080 14
CB 18 6"-#1096 0.280 85 15000 0.034 890 1256 1293 1311 0.023 0.084 0.103 12
lc-9P ' to -io 3 o-3" 75- ~00 4 110~'
_ReV
0
0
IV)
C 3
p
4.~
1'740-1 V'U:;;V
'yjEPF .WZZ4q3
'0:v
(Z ~ I OBI-FZ1Th b
*~~Sr FPQMUM~~C1OI
SLSEVIRA M.flb
AmR CRaw"Y t, 10
01 1 ~~~~~~~OD Form D OIL0pmfdi eDspau
All fina calcaul s aetO b prp are fin d cc ao w tea p OpOe
MofctonCM1Manwals. Mach I Ina 1a~3 0ot
99 c TcKU 2) 1 $kow ' ,fz
oi~~~~ b6Aj -o, Or( T 307K
1Th~, rhu W",
-/rid~
MtA~ Vh 5
P~cvieeef (prin &4i0W9l
PJ)fLL4'
)4c1fDate Tm
V.-
0
Now York Power Authority
Calculation No.: IP3-CALC-SWS-0 1596
Project: 1P3
Subject: P~imum Pipe Wall Thickness and Maximum Through-Wall
FSaw Size for Seismic Class I SW Unes
Revison : 0
Page 19 of 26 Computed by d-~*Oas__
Checked by M' Date'A4/ q(0
~PS)
Foi C.S. ith tm:tn = 0.3
~2.50 ----........ . ...... ......
44
E
.00 0 D 0C k O 0 L
6 6 C 6r
VEC 4 1
Maiu xIlS Wl
FiueEMxmmTruhWl icmeeta lw o .S WUe NS:1 o1'
Al Nuclear Engineering CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET
Nuclear Plant:
CALC. NO. LP3-CALC-SWS-03023 CALCULATION IS: PRELIMINARY: ___F
IP3 Eli JAFL= PAGE1IOF 2
REV. 0 INAL: X-
PREPARER: CHECKER: (DESIGN) VERIFIED:/NA APPROVED:
ORIGINATOR: NYPA SYSTEM NO./NAME: TITLE:
N~AME Mara Lakis Kai Lo
?,A'r'( 14 ( ",-t
Richard Drake
[311] OR OTHER =l F44-0150 / Service Water System
inimum. Wall Thickness at RIO Inspection Locations
QA CATEGORY: I DISCIPLINE: Civil/Str STRUCTURE: Piping
MODIFICATION NO./TASK NO. WR 98-05100 DBD REF. NO. 304 &310
PROBLEM/OBJECTIVEJMETHOD To calculate minimum wall thickness and required wall thickness for projected service at the R10 inspection locations
DESIGN BASIS/ASSUMPTIONS 1P3 FSAR and IP3-DBD-3 10
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS See Tables 1 through 4 in body of calculation
-1) Ilt
THIS CALC SUPERSEDES OR VOIDS CALC. NO. None
DISTRIBUTION: C = CONTROLLED I = INFO
NAME DEPT LOC C I__ D. Pennino JDSE ADM 45-3-H ___ __
R. S. Drake IDEM 24-A __ _
NYPA FORM DCM-2, ATTACHMENT 4.1
DAT"AT 10 , 9 f//I 11-,
A 1/L 7, "A/
11 A
SECURITY: (YIN) N COMPUTER PRINTOUT: (YIN) Y
NYPA FORM DCM-2, ATTACHMENT 4.1
Nuclear Engineering
CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET
PAGE 2 OF 2 _________ COMPONENTS - _ ___
MAJOR EQUIPMENT PIPE NO. VALVE NO. SUPT. NO. INST. NO. PENE. NO.
408,409,406 ______________
1- Ia, Ib, 1 c, _______
lld,1ie,12a, ______ ____________
I 2b,1 2c,1 2d, ______
____________405,411,407, _______
__________671,672,1099_____________
__________1093,1101, ______
1094,1231 ______
__________1096,1081-86 ______
712,1219 FCU 31-35 3" Supply & 3" Return
______________ lines _______ _______ _______ _______
RELATED DOCUMENTS 1i. NRC eneric Letter 89-13
REFERENCES 1. References listed in boyof calculation, pae9
S2. ANSI B31.1 - 1967 I3. Teledyne Engineering Services TR - 7366 -4
RELATED DRAWINGS 1. 9321-F-53533 15. 9321-F-26913 2. 9321-F-53543 16. 9321-F-22443 3. 9321-F-53523 17. M-SWN-SK-041 4. 9321-F-27023 18. 9321-F-23423 5. 9321-F-55113 19. 9321-F-22443 6. 9321-F-55163 20. 9321-F-22423 7. 9321-F-55123 21. 9321-F-70020 8. 9321-F-27003 22. 9321-F-27033 9. 9321-F-26903 23. 9321-F-20973 10. INRN-1020-22 24. 9321-F-70053 11. 9321-F-26923 12. 9321-F-27483 13. INRN-1020-21 14. 932 1-F-26903
ATTACHMENT 1
DCM-4, Revision 4 Page 1 of 1
DESIGN VERIFICATION COVERSHEET
Verification of:
Document Title: Minimum Wall Thickness at RIO Inspection Locations
Document Number: Subject:
1P3-CALC-SWS-03023 Rev: 0 Minimum Wall Thickness at RIO Inspection Location
Modification/Task WR98-05100
Number (if applicable):
QA Category: I
Review Required
Discipline
ELECTRICAL
MECHANICAL INSTRUMENT
_______& CONTROL
I STRUCTURAL rh7 FIRET
PROTECTION
Review Complete (initials of reviewer)
ri~
ATTACHMENT 6mrmI A ~ A Pan-e 1 of 6
CALCULATION VERIFICATION CHECKLIST
IDENTIFICATION: DISCIPFLINE:
Document Title: Minimum Wall Thickness at RIO Inspection locations ___ I) ELEC 0 I&C
(print title) U MECH U Fire Protection 1( C/S
Doc. Number: 1P3-CALC-SWS-03023 Rev: 0 U Other_______
QA Category- _I_________
Selected Verifier: Zarif Rafla /. IDEM /2122
METHOD OF VERIFICATION: /* Design Review 0 Alternate Calculations 0 Qualification Test
fYes U No O
Paragraph No:____
Verifier Comments: 2A Cat. I requirements shown on the cover pane
Resolution:
2. Were the objectives, method and purpose of the calculation completely Whce Found
and clearly stated? Page No: 2, 3, and 4__
" Purpose: Why the calculation is necessary (problem statement) OR
" Objective: What we are trying to demonstratePagrpNo " Method: How we intend to achieve the objective(s) Pni~iN.___
/Yes U No
Verifier Comments: The Calculation clearly identify the purpose, obective, and the method used for analysis
Resolution:
ATTACHMENT 6flCM-4~ R~vi4dAn 4 Page 2 of 6
CALCULATION VERIFICATION CHECKLIST
3. Were design inputs completely and correctly selected, consistent with Where Found
the design bases, applied appropriately and the corresponding source of Page No: 2, 3, and
information referenced?
Design inputs shall be provided in sufficient detail to permit the calculation to be OR
carried out in a correct manner and to provide a consistent basis for making design PagrpNo decisions, accomplishing design verification measures and evaluating the calculation. SaTpNo_____
Design inputs include design bases, plant operational conditions, performance
requirements, regulatory requirements and commitments, codes, standards, field data,
etc. All information used as design shall have been reviewed and approved by the
responsible design organization and applicable to [P3.
All inputs need to be retrievable or excerpts of documents used shall be attached.
/Yes 0 No
Verifier Comments: Design inputs is accurate for the described problem.
Resolution:
4. Were assumptions (e.g., temperature, pressure, flow, weight, sie, Where Found
location, clearances, current, voltage, cable lengths, maintenance and PaeNo: _____
test equipment, environmental qualifications, plant operational condition, etc.) documented, adequately justified and/or verified? OR
Assumptions that require verification following the issuance of the calculation need to Paragraph No:_____
be tracked via the ACTS system. The calculation needs to include a statement of the risk involved with implementation of the results prior to verifying the assumptions.
Based on the risk involved, the calculation may or may not be approved for use.
Q Yes C3 No /N/A
Verifier Comments: No assumption used. The calculation used eisting design documents and B31.1 Code requirements.
Resolution:
ATTACHMENT 6Page 3 of 6Th~~LA P5~iiele'in A
CALCULATION VERIFICATION CHECKLIST ________I 5. Were applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements, as Whr Found
committed to in the 1P3 license (FSAR, Technical Specifications, NRC Page No: _Page 2 of thecoe
Commitments), properly considered? (Reference 7.1.1) she_____
OR
/Yes U No U N/A Paxgraph No:___
Verifier Comments: See Related documents and references
Resolution:
6. For a calculation that utilized software applications, was the computer W~here Found
output reviewed and verified, and was the software application Page No: All
properly verified and validated in accordance with CMM-5.1I? attachments____
OR
Software that is used for word processing does not need to be verified or validated. Paragraph No:_____
V Yes U No U N/A
Verifier Comments: All computer runs are attached and checked as required.
Resolution:
7. Was operational experiences or impact on plant operations and4 Where Found
maintenance addressed? Page No.______
OR
U Yes UI3No %fN/A Paragraph No: ____
Verifier Comments: Calculation is performed to check existing conditions. No new design is issued for this
calculation.
Resolution:
)DflM-4~ Revision 4
0 ATTACHMENT 6
CALCULATION VERIFICATION CHECKLIST
8. For calculation revisions, was the scope of the revision properly and completely described? Were the design inputs and references reviewed to ensure that they are still applicable? Was the impact of the revision on documentation that references the calculation considered?
ACTS Items should have been generated to track any necessary updates to other documents.
0 Yes Q No / N/A
Wbere Found
Page No: _______
OR
Paragraph. No:____
Resolution:
9. Were interactions with other calculations, including those of other disciplines, considered?
If the calculation involves multiple disciplines, was an interdisciplinary review conducted? ACTS items should have been generated to track any necessary updates to other documents. Changes
required to documents used as input need to be completed prior to issuance of this calculation.
U Yes U No / N/A
"'here Found
Page No:________
ORt
Paragraph No: _____
Resolution:
10. Was the methodology appropriate to meet the objective and was it properly applied?I
,(Yes U No
Where Found
Page No: -2,3, and
4
OR
Paragraph No: _____
Verifier Comments: Method used in this analysis is appropriate for design conditions.
Resolution:
0Paae 4 of 6
I
IfDCM-4, Revision 4
0 ATTACHMENT 6Page 5 of 6
CALCULATION VERIFICATION CHECKLIST _________Wsthe conclusion of the calculation clearly stated, did it correspond
directly with the objectives, and are the results reasonable based on the
inputs?
,/Yes C)No
I Where WOUDUPag No Whr o
PageNo:__5_through
OR
Paragraph No: ____
Verifier Comments: Minimum wall thickness for each pipe is shown on appropriate page.
Resolution:
12. Considering the objective and purpose, was the acceptance criteria forWhere Found
the calculation________________.
/Yes U No OR
Paragraph No:____
Verifier Comments: This calculation is performed to find the minimum pipe Wail thickness. The acceptance,
or rejection will depend on field measurements. Each case will be evaluated separately for acceptance or
rejection._
Resolution:
13. Were appropriate follow up actions identified if the results of the
calculation require changes to equipment, design, other calculation(s), Surveillance Test Procedures, Operating Procedures, Maintenance
Procedures, FSAR, DBD, etc.?
,(Yes U No O N/A
Where Found
Page No: -Cover Page
OR
Paragraph No: ____
Pare No: 2 throu~
Verifier Comments: ACT # 99-43819 is issued for the required tracking and replacement of the branch line
duringR 11
Resolution:
ATTACHMENT 6Page 6of 6
~sfThg A ~ A
CAL CUL TATION VERIIFICATION CHECKLIST
Was DE iniiatd ifthecalculation results indicate the existence of a
condition adverse to quality in accordance with AP-8?
U Yes 0 No ( N/A
Where Found
Page No: _______
OR
Paragraph No: ____
Verifier Comments:
Resolution:
15. Have all additional verifier's concerns such as procedural adherence, brFon
clarity, neatness, proper use of references, impact on engineering Page No:______
programs, etc. been addressed? OR
U Yes U No IN/A Paragraph No:___
Verifier Comments:
Resolution:
All comments for "NO" answers have been resolved satisfactorily. The calculation was verified to be
adequate for the given design inputs.
Design Verification Complete: -Zarif Rafla/8-79
(pinmmn, simm datc)
0
I
NEWYORK POWER AUTHORITY
Calculation No.: 1P3-CALC-SWS-03023
Project 1P3
Subject Minimum Wall Thickness At RIO Inspection Locations
Revision: 0
Page_ / of _
Computed by____ Date
Checked by & Date___
Contents Page No.
1. Introduction ..................................................... 2
2. Evaluation of Minimum Wall Thickness ......................... 3
3. Required Wall Thickness for Projected Service .................. 4
4. Results ........................................................... 4
5. R eferences ................ ... .... .. .... ... 8a
.Required Pipe Wall Thickness for Projected 2 Year Service
Table 1 (PAB Inspection Locations)............................. 5
Table 2 (VC Inspection Locations)............................... 6
Table 3 (GB Inspection Locations) .............................. 7
Table 4 (IS, YD, & TB Inspection Locations) .................... 8
Attachments
Computer Output for CB-3 & CB-1O0
Computer Output for CB-9
Computer Output for CB-16
Computer Output for YD-1
NEWYORK POWER AUTHORITY
Calculation No.: IP3-CALC-SWS-03023
Project 1133
Subject Minimum Wall Thickness At RIO Inspection Locations
Revision: 0
Page of
Computed by I/c/- Date c9/01 92 Checked by Dat_,,i
1. Introduction
The purpose of this calculation is to evaluate minimum pipe wall thicknesses at the 76 locations scheduled to be inspected during R1iO refueling outage. These selected locations for the RIO0 RT examinations are indicated in Reference 19.
The minimum wall calculation is based on the stress at the locations and the code requirement, except as noted. The calculation of the required pipe wall for a projected service is dependent upon the erosion/corrosion rate, the projected service duration and the minimum pipe wall thickness. The methodology and formnulation of the calculations as provided in Section 2 and 3 use the method of performing pipe wall thinning evaluations of Reference 20.
2. Evaluation of Minimum Pipe Wall Thickness
2.1 Seismic Class 1 SW Piping Design Data (Ref. 17)
P (Design Pressure) = T (Design Temperature)= NPS [1] 11"- 1O
12" - 24"
150 psi 1600 F (max.)
Sch. 40 tn,= 0.375 wall
Pipe Material Carbon Steel
A53 SML Gr B, Cement lined A106 SML Gr B, Cement lined
Stainless Steel A312 SML TP 304 A213 SML TP 316 A312 SML PT 316L B677 Welded TP 904L
2.2 Minimum Thickness required for Hoop Stress:
t= P*D/(2*(Sh +.4*P) + A
Sh (Allowable Stress at 1600F) (Ref. 17)
15 ksi 15 ksi
18.75 ksi 18.75 ksi
15.7 ksi 17.1 ksi
(Ref. 17) (Ref. 17) (Ref. 17) (Ref. 17)
(Ref. 17)
Where D = Outside diameter of pipe A = Erosion/corrosion tolerance, (A = 0 is assumed for this calculation)
2.3 Minimum Thickness required for Axial Stress:
S (axial stress) = Sp + Sb (Ref. 17)
Where Sp :Axial stress due to pressure = PD/4t,,m, Sb :Bending stress due to dead weight (dw) or seismic loads
Notes: [1] NPS = Nominal Pipe Size; t., = Pipe Nominal Thickness
NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY
Calculation No.: 1P3-CALC-SWS-03023
Project IP3
Subject Minimum Wall Thickness At RIO Inspection Locations
Revision: 0
Plage 3 of__C
Computed by_ Date_ _
Checked by te Date__
a) For 1P3 Seismic Class 1 Piping except FCU Service Water Piping, axial stresses for various conditions shall satisfy the stress limits as follows:
SNOR (Normal condition) = Sp + Sdw Sups (Upset condition) = Sp + Sdw + Sobe SEMG (Emergency condition) = Sp + Sdw + Sdbe
<= Sh (Ref. 17) < = 1.2 Sh < = 1.8 Sh
Where Sdw, Sobe and Sdbe are bending stresses for dead weight, operation basis earthquake (obe) and design basis earthquake (dbe).
b) For 1P3 FCU Service Water Piping, axial stresses for various conditions shall satisfy the stress limits as follows:
(Ref. 21)
Operational Condition
Normal (SNoR) Upset 1 (Sups,) Upset 2 (Sups2) Upset 3 (Sups3) Emergency (SEMG)
Load Combination
P +DW P + DW+ OBE P +DW +WHT P + DW + WHIL P + DW+ DBE
Stress Allowable
1.Sh 1.2Sh 1.2 Sh
1.8 sh
Where: DW = Dead Weight P = Design Pressure OBE = Operational Basis Earthquake DBE = Design Basis Earthquake WH-T =Column closure waterhammer resulting from simulated
LOOP event WHL =Column closure waterhammer resulting from LOOP events
(return piping only)
=Maximum (SNOR/Sh, Sup/l .2 Sb, SEMG/ .8Sh ) l"tn
2.4 Total Minimum Required Pipe Wall Thickness: (tmin)
tmlfl = Maximum (tp, t, .3*t,,)
Where 30% of tn= is the lower bound for repair.
(Ref. 21)
(Ref. 17)
NEWYORK POWER AUTHORITY
Calculation No.: IP3-CALC-SWS-03023 Revision: 0
Project 1P3 Page..Q. of____4
Subject Minimum Wall Thickness Computed byIO Date___ At RIO Inspection Localtions Cekdb .. Dt___
3. Required Pipe Wall Thickness for ProjectService (tQ
For a pipe wall thinning due to erosion/corrosion, the required pipe wall thickness for the projected service shall include the erosion/corrosion during the projected service duration. It can be expressed as follows:
ttq2tn+ E/C Rate * N
Where N = projected service years after inspection, E/C Rate can be estimated as (1. .125* t,,,~~ IY (Ref. 21) t,,,, = measured wall thickness of inspection Y = total service years before inspection
The measured wall thickness for the projected service shall be larger than the required wall thickness, i.e., tm, 2: teq. Let tmeas = t., and substitute into the above formulas, we can obtain the minimum t1 , as follows:
tm z(ti + 1. .125*tnom*N/ )/( 1 + NNY
4. Results
Based on the equations in previous sections and the maximum stresses at points of inspection, the minimum wall thickness, t.-, and the required thickness for two years service, teq, are calculated and listed in Table I (PAB locations). Table 2 (VC locations), Table 3 (CB locations) and Table 4 (IS, YD, and TB locations).
TABLE I
Required Pipe Wal Thickness for Projected 2 Year Service
ID No. Line No. tnom Node No. Sh tp SP SDW SOB SNOR SU~PS SEMO tmn 11 , Ref. PAB 7 18" -#408 0.375 151/153 15000 0.090 1800 1600 4689 3400 8089 10433.5 0.169 0.169 0.190 3 PAB 8 18" -#409 0.375 525 15000 0.09 1800 1600 3052 3400 6452 7978 0.134 0.134 0.158 4 PAB 9 18- #409 0.375 545 15000 0.090 1800 1600 5144 3400 8543 11116 0.178 0.178 0.198 4 PABl10 18- #406 0.375 621 15000 0.090 1800 550 1807 2350 4157 5060.5 0.087 0.113 0.138 2 PAB 14 18" -#406 0.375 335 15000 0.090 1800 811 4766 2611 7377 9760 0.154 0.154 0.176 2 PAB 20 10"- #11e 0.365 9/11 15000 0.055 1100 900 770 2000 2770 3155 0.056 0.110 0.135 3 PAB 21 10 -#406 0.365 838 15000 0.055 1100 382 911 1482 2393 2848.5 0.049 0.110 0.135 2 PAB 22 1U'- #11c 0.365 502 15000 0.055 1100 550 1104 1650 2754 3306 0.056 0.110 0.135 3 PAB 23 24" -#405 0.375 640/650 15000 0.120 2400 3185 3472 3612 0.080 0.120 0.145 5 PAB 24 18" -#411 0.375 253 15000 0.090 1800 407 1043 2207 3250 3771.5 0.068 0.113 0.138 1 PAB 25 18" - #407 0.375 280/281 15000 0.090 1800 1067 3451 2867 6318 8043.5 0.132 0.132 0.156 1 PAB 26 24" -#409 0.375 330 15000 0.120 2400 1350 3967 3750 7717 9700.5 0.161 0.161 0.183 4 PAB 27;9 ~O- #11 e 0.154 15000 0.055 1100 (2" SWN-42-5 Inlet line) 0.135 0.138 6 PAB 28 ~0 - #11Ic 0.365 61/63 15000 0.055 1100 550 1365 1650 3015 3697.5 0.061 0.110 0.135 3 PA8 29 10" -#12d 0.365 114/115 15000 0.055 1100 620 3957 1720 5677 7655.5 0.115 0.115 0.140 2 PAB 30 18" -#407 0.375 419 15000 0.090 1800 174 485 1974 2459 2701.5 0.051 0.113 0.138 1 PAB 31 14" -#408 0.375 43 15000 0.071 1400 1210 2294 2610 4904 6051 0.102 0.113 0.138 3 PAB 32 la0- #1lb 0.365 83/85 15000 0.055 1100 370 3106 1470 4576 6129 0.093 0.110 0.135 3 PAB 33 2a'- #411 0.375 320/319 15000 0.101 2000 369 1880 2369 4249 5189 0.089 0.113 0.138 1
'.c 0
3) a
(a
am
C) 0
00
0
ID X
CO 'a
0D
0
TABLE 2
Required Pipe Wall Thickness for Projected 2 Year Service
-- S t. tm 1 t,. Ref'
Line No. Node No. t,,,om h IV ONOR 'UPU1ID No.I VC-8
VC-22 VC-23 VC-36 VC-37 VC-38 VC-39 VC-40 VC-41 VC-42 VC-43 VC-44 VC-45 VC-46 VC-47 VC-48 VC-49 VC-50 VC-51 VC-52
VC-31 -1 VC-32-2 VC-32-3 VC-32-4 VC-32-5 VC-33-1 VC-34-1 VC-35-1 VC-31 -7 VC-31 -8 VC-32-7 VC-32-8 VC-33-7 VC-33-8 VC-34-7 VC-34-8 VC-35-7 IVC-35-8
6.9 4.08 5.51 7.57 9.1
10"-#11lb 1 0"-41 C I0"-#12c I0"4#12c 10"4#12b 2"4671 10'*-#12e I0"411 b 1 0"4#12a 2"4#672 1 0"4#12b 10"4#12d 19,411llC 10'-411a 19'41 2a 10"4#12e 10"411 e 1 0"4#12d 10"4#I1d 1 0"4#1 C
12b-A 11 d-E 12d-C 12d-B 12d-F 12a-A 12c-E I 2e-A lia-F 12b-B 11 d-G 12d-E 11 b-A 12a-F 11 c-D 12c-C 11.e-B 12.-B
UP32 P0.14640/650 421/425 109/110
39/41 70/80
122/123 820 1380
780 160 138 1310 1280 87/90
90 15 15
140 7060 290 490 390 335
3560 545 290 3790 6050 490 245
10110 3040 1120 381 350 390
0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.154 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.154 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.365 15 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216, 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1 0.216 17.1
0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015
O.IO~L CA~L, O.1C~ ~f
1.32 1.33 1.24 2.32 2.18 2.9 1.58 2.71 1.21 2.9 1.18 1.82 2.28 2.01 2.32 1.41 1.43 1.49 1.99 2.3 0.74 1.19 1.13 1.32 1.98 1.07 1.02 0.91 0.7 0.78 1.23 1.93 1.7
0.93 0.91 1.89 0.8 0.83
2.16 0 6.9 4.53 0 4.53 4.49 5.59 5.59 6.17 6.72 7.57
9 7.89 9.1 12
4.89 15.82 15.82 6.78 0 7.47 3.13 3.13 11.01
12 1.18 1.18 1.18 8.14 10.23 10.23 5.79 0 8.72 5.91 0 9.11 5.29 9.98 9.98 7.61 5.45 7.61 5.48 0 7.02 5.8 10.57 10.57 7.83 0 10.17 8.94 0 8.94 1.01 4.9 4.9 3.78 0 4.04 1.45 5.76 5.76 3.59 7.53 7.53 3.27 6.38 6.62 1.98 1.93 2.87 1.71 1.56 1.71 1.31 8.37 8.37 3.78 0 8.03 1.25 4.35 4.35 1.78 0 4.23 4.44 17.42 17.42 3.06 0 5.36 2.92 2.83 7.4 2.12 0 2.12 3.01 4.18 4.18 2.5 0 4.21 1.29 6.5 6.5
8.3 4.03 6.25 9.21 8.55 16.5 4.41 7.96 10.69 16.5 1.18 8.18 7.95 8.38 6.83 6.3 6.63 6.96 9.84 7.9
2.96 4.09 3.94 4.35 6.54 2.98 1.47 4.09 7.34 3.13 4.23 5.99 6.6 7.94 1.69 3.57 5.37 3.25
VC 5t "~ 4 J Q' ~ss~~jvc, f ().162 ()-t6z Cu Lf,+Pom 0. 33
I
0.092 0.113 0.154 0.185 0.103 0.321 0.151 0.223 0.103 0.029 0.207 0.177 0.185 0.202 0.154 0.142 0.214 0.206 0.181 0.052 0.043 0.061
0.140 0.162 7 0.110 0.135 7 0.113 0.138 7 0.154 0.175 7 0.185 0.203 7 0.103 0.109 8 0.321 0.328 7 0.151 0.173 7 0.223 0.239 7 0.103 0.109 8 0.110 0.135 7 0.207 0.224 7 0.177 0.196 7 0.185 0.204 7 0.202 0.220 7 0.154 0.176 7 0.142 0.165 7 0.214 0.231 7 0.206 0.223 7 0.181 0.200 P70.065 0.080 7 0.065 0.080 7 0.065 0.080 7
4.74 7.47
11.01
1.18 9.26 8.72 9.11 6.53 7.36 7.02 7.49 10.17 8.62 2.83 4.04 3.28 4.72 6.62 2.87 1.4
3.59 8.03 2.96 4.23 6.06 5.36 7.4
1.65 3.33 4.21 2.91
0 0 m ;U
*.(0 0
0r
C)
0.079 -0.079 0.093 7 0.07 0.070 0.084 7 0.03 0.065 0.080 7
0.018 0.065 0.080 7 0.088 0.088 0.101 7 0.085 0.085 0.098 7 0.046 0.065 0.080 7 0.045 0.065 0.080 7 0.183 0.183 0.188 7 0.056 0.065 0.080 7 0.078 0.078 0.092 7 0.022 0.065 0.080 7' 0.044 0.065 0.080 7 0.044 0.065 0.080 7 0.068 0.068 0.083 7
CD
0
0
>1 z
Cm 0.~ 0
;U XI
TABLE 3 Required Pipe Wall Thickness for Projected 2 Year Service
ID No. ILine No. It,,, Node No I h Itp ISPI SDW I SOBE I NOR I UPS I EMG t t. 1, t,. Ref15 15000 95 15000 70 15000
enveloped 15000 enveloped 15000 enveloped 15700 enveloped 15000 7,10,12 15000
85 15000
0.054 0.054 0.054 0.034 0.034 0.022 0.034 0.017 0.034
1100 1100 1100 890 890 710 890 498 890
443 443 173 443 166
1636 1199 2018 1361 1361 843 1361 581 1256
1792 1593 2278 1804 1804 1016 1804 747 1293
1869 0.040 1788 0.032 2408 0.049 2026 0.028 2026 0.028 1103 0.013 2026 0.028 830 0.009
1311 0.023
0.110 0.110 0.110 0.084 0.084 0.071 0.084 0.065 0.064
0.135 0.135 0.135 0.103 0.103 0.087 0.103 0.080 0.103
wo C
Z
0
> z C m
0) 0
G m 0)
p 0
0 0 Tb m
:r 0) D -9
Orj CL
CD
CB 3 CB 9 CB1 0 CB 11 CB 12 CB 13 CB 14 CB 15 CB 16
10"-#1 099 10"-#1 093 10"-#1 099 6"-#1101 6"-#1 094 4"-#1 093
6"#093 3"-#1 231 6"-#1 096
0.365 0.365 0.365 0.280 0.2800.237 0.280 0.216 0.280
I
TABLE 4
Required Pipe Wall Thickness for Projected 2 Year Service
t5- 1 - 6ra v e- 0. 0b5 (0" a)
C
0
c m
u0
;U
0) 0
X 0.~
I. 0
=r 0 m S3(
0.00
0.
S0 *'
~CO0
ID No. Line No tnom Sh tp SP Sdw Sob*. SNOR SUPS SEMO %g tmi 4, Ref IS-2 14"-#1085 0.375 15000 0.071 1400 510 829 1910 2739 3153.5 0.057 0.113 0.138 15 IS-3 14"-#1083 0.375 15000 0.071 1400 246 399 1646 2045 2244.5 0.043 0.113 0.138 15 IS-7 14"-#1081 0.375 15000 0.071 1400 616 998 2016 3014 3513 0.063 0.113 0.138 15 IS-8 14"-#1082 0.375 15000 0.071 1400 510 829 1910 2739 3153.5 0.057 0.113 0.138 15 IS-9 14"4#1086 0.375 15000 0.071 1400 1700 2755 3100 5855 7232.5 0.122 0.122 0.147 15 IS-10 14"-#1084 0.375 15000 0.071 1400 48 78 1448 1526 1565 0.036 0.113 0.138 15 YD-1 24"-#712 0.375 15000 0.12 2400 3019 4770 5141 0.099 0.120 0.145 16 YD-2 16"4#1219 0.375 15000 0.079 1600 1500 9000 3100 12100 16600 0.252 0.252 0.266 17 YD-3 24"-#409 0.375 15000 0.12 2400 1350 6150 3750 9900 12975 0.206 0.206 0.224 6 TB-I N 0.065 17100 0.0016 220 1500 2955 1720 4675 6152.5 0.015 0.020 0.024 18
(CIO
NEW YORK POWER0 AUTHORITY
Calculation No.: IP3-CALC-SWS-03023 Revision: 0
Project: lP3 Page-&-..of ~
Subject Minimum Wall Thickness Computed by_____ Date f/0o9 At RIO Inspection Locations
Checked by A ~~Dat e~L/
5. References
1. UIE&C Caic. 6604.343-C-SW-005
2. UE&C Prob. 440 SWS Lines 12A - 12E & 406 (Outside Containment)
3. UE&C Prob. 417 ('79 analysis)
4. UE&C Prob. 418 ('79 analysis)
5. IP3-CALC-AC-00054, Rev. 1
6. ASME Section VIII, Div. 1, Table UNF-23.3
7. ALTRAN Tech Rpt #971 24-TR-01, Rev. 1 of Vol. 2 & Rev. 3 of Vol. 1 ALTRAN Tech Rpt #97124-TR-02, Rev. 0
8. Pages 9 & 10 Stress calculation for inspection points VC-38 & VC-42
9. Pages 11 & 12 Stress calculation for inspection point VC-52
10. Page 13 Stress calculation for inspection points CB-3 & CB-1 0
11. Page 14 Stress calculation for inspection point CB-9
12. Page 15 Stress calculation for inspection point CB-1 6
13. UE&C Ca~c. 6604.003
14. UIE&C Ca~c. 6604-C-SWS-051 (10/29/94 with ECN)
15. Pages 16 -22 Stress calculation for inspection points IS-I through IS-lO0
16. Pages 23 & 24 Stress calculation for inspection point YD-1
17. IP3-CALC-SWS-01596, Rev. 1
18. Page 25 Stress calculation for inspection point TB-i
19. Memo: IP-DSE-98-227MC, dated 3/9/99
20. NYPA Eng. Std. CES-7, Rev. 2
21. IP3-CALC-SWS-02419, Rev. 1
NewYorkPower Abthority Calculatioll NO . ...... . ,A? ........ .2 t ....... 0 ..........
S u bject .. ... .... .... ... ... ... .... ... ... .... ... ..... .... .. .. ... ... ....~ .... .... (V34 iC
R evision ............. .......... .. .
Page 9 .....of om I 11V
Computed by . ' Date r/Ogr
Checked by..- C Date
F -
(~/: ~kF~7K&32
4,94~ 9O~'~6 66
~~-5 j /(RA
cX5' 'I(LLV
7R~
Corl
0~', 1-
/
#?CW vc-~J2 ~
4 ---- 1---UT V a_2 4 r&
ai,~
C:: 3
ei47/
E
\IC-3GS
5&nc aw e C!)
T4x~
/0 - 11A
0 , /Va/U-Seol
NewYorkPower Authority Caiculation No. . x .-0 .e.......................
Protec .. .*... Page 1 9 o
ect ~~ ~ ~ ( & 1 ........ ............ ...kdb
.< -... "/9.....?...
vve t
73-
T= 5
12-' 1HJ
5rI 3-6v4' :7
A!- 7~
-5
WWI ~5~tL
a~917(5{O)
L5 - T3 CVO~2
- /~5(i~, 3757) - IC
- _ 'D
qc290~7 1/)
Z . , -- &
9' fpc
6f C
"It1s,
z /9i(~ ~zJ~
j 616-
Allu i S
7 /0 S' (-
. 1! C? 9 051<- ,
;X-
6e)'-) V?(ef 511-141
-65 t!Jfllde'ltye
12q)
NidwYorkPower Authority C 0iaN
PC~i sa n o ................ -----
Project~~ v c -5........... ............................. )........page ...... ........
Cornpiedby ............... Dat
Checked by kCjaM /'/e,
1-ii-Ij7,~
S AN- 1 -G
swm4% -16h 5
(2C . ~ 5 5
v
(a~i6-s~& b7 ld 4 J~A4')
(ia) ~~0
h // ~rco6.10
01133~n
-3 ./33 (~/al =13 -. / 0 'f~ /3
DETAIL X
pe
q .11 f I. ,f *I -10
NewYorkPower Authority
................
................
0 0
~Se1(1-k313 fdc
eKz
65UP
CheCkedby Date ? .. /
.cz -/("7
7
J( ~)
: , 5
JS/= IJ7S812 C,c5A .t L 0 4
5w 5BC
- 0,0
0-0A2-5 - .5e~~ Rev a CalculatioiNo. / ............. .. e i in ..........................
Project Page............ ........................................................ P g fC.l o
,'4 ~ e .a.t74 s 0i /O?/~ 0'/ Campctedby 44Dt
= , () t7
( =- /0 )
(Cfr4 0~
ofu k~-
cc) mP
/0 L-#/0o9
C-CD
0<
0
0 0~
e Le
(AS
13
4p Cr?/S /CUP
c -fo
-0 -< . 0
0
(A 'a 0
0 J c
NIA G
54)ON - i/VP - /0 13- /i-t'
/0
/ 4)C vicALs 110* 140
f)dl- 1 - 196- S &
C01B.5/11AA/ pd /0 ,
6
V) m
a
0
C.0J
0< 0
0'
CD
T.6
0l
I74
C3 -16-\
SW - 111M - /0 96 -34 -P-
. Al - ijO - / 0 9- 4"o - &
NetNYorkPower Authority /P, Revision ......... .... . ..
Sujct710 45 /V5PC7 M - /v1ACompued by Dt
k/6'IL ...........~5 ...C ....... Checked by Dt
' t ~ 4 ~. cJx
/70 .1& O
,6oef5
Vc',
0.7I)' OdS. 16146 5J
e =: IZ4 //
NewYorkPower Authority ciaula iPj - W C- ...............
ba 4 ........... ........... S ..............
k /ew 110 ... ..?...................................................... .. .............
S. 9/ .... ',~S "O,4w ........
0
COMvued by /i 'Date .........
0*ecedby Date --m .)1
PIPE MATERIAL AND PROPERTIES
Line Designation
Material Pipe O.D. (in)
Schedule thickness (in)
Wt. of Pipe (#/ft) Wt. of Fluid (if/fl) Wt. of Insul (/t
Design Conditions
Temperature (ff) Pressure (psi)
Operating Conditions
Temperature (-Q F) Pressure (psi) Linear Th exp (in/fl) Mean exp (10-0 in/in/0F)
Modulus of Elasticity
Ec (10 6 psi) Eh (10O( psi)
Allowable Stress
(psi) (psi)
/~q'3 109$
/0.73 /0.7 ;:~;~ 62,3~&
____ 94.50
/0 ______
9,5c~
/60
a
1 79
1 1 /099 ____
0, ~97
/0 1
6(ve)
(
10D /J-0
t1.3-0
01 006
---2L7, .19
---E -J:79 -.
NewYorkPower 0 qRevls*O......f......l............. Calcutalon No. ...........56 -0 0 ................ R vso
PrS............ Page ........4 .of 9V
Sub 14,6U/f Wa24S Cornputedby 04 .Da te ...?/
........ ..... .................................... .... ... -4b/9 ecked by .. ~ Date.2.-) /
w 8 Z( qr.~ +
(Car n 177 pcf 1e? O. aeaJ /0F/
* *64 -W/P
Z.L # Ines3 i z y
'5-3
4' wl~ z 110*#
7 77 C i
As/ 10,f6
2 9
44 4LI
^ -Nw~brkRbwer 40 Authority 1P0~~c'N /3- CRW- 5W )5 - 0 W
Subject J , ...... .............
/4j~1&~d 7&~s -RIO/np/t
0 Revision . ...
Pageof0.0
Computed by ~. Date hS/(9~
Checked by . D
QA,. 2 e4o# / 9 e 40
'1
c~r7
A -=7T D XL :7T~7 at
%S SIL q.A- ,
C2
J 6 -
(0o 4 o37
L21 /N 1046'
&6 / (
Fv 7 oS~\o~
14-, Y 415
. Z
I. 1-,4- ~.a-4, 1 i~4 lo 1
40 wc 10 0 Yo e 1'!
1. iD 4.
IL
p Miss t1kre- -
OWfewYork~ower 40 Authority
Calculation'No . f' c ......................3 Protect C L 0 - .................. .................
Subject D E Z 95 , ...l( .......... ................
.. ... ... . ...... ... .. ... .. .. ...............
6 Revision, ........ ...... ......
Page ~6 Of
Computed by ~ Date.
Checked by .. a..e .....Date
qj 2 70,003'~
0.7( .3
7-
Is WC14
I % J
3 X
0, 0 S I , - 0 no 0. o4
' ewYork Power ,t Athority
. - A ~ 2 SCalculationNo. V ,6(f.(~ .)C . ) 4K/ ( . .. ............ - Revis ........ ..... ............
Project... ........... . ... Page 16 ~C .Of F 4
Subject ...a ......... .. Compedby ~Date &i~'
/'tt~C± ~/ /fl~ hc1 Checked by Date ~/ /
ed~~Q c~1A~A
~
L-)
r
I /1 ~
-. I- ~
e,
,,- 0,01 4 -
!-J be",C
I%C4~,%~ C)
oQ44- 'o0- 14-z
0 Y-
2-i-- /~',~8# ~~-4-~
0-01514
.* 1 04-
0~ 2J(o
K~H~C~6C~ -7) Cj~~e~v
6meA5Aa.5>2
CCY- ro )-/e_.( 0S o rA =. 0C~, 11
C.3ct ,L3 0 .Q0.
*--O$ .e u e f0 o)tKi .- -e, __ _ _ __ _ _ 4
VC~ -
9.A ? "
P~ s s U~.t
'4
WC ,) -, 7""; rO t,
-It
1(0 ll - -/, / 6
'NewYorVPower *A~thority CacltonN ... 3 -014C - 5 0 :5 ....... ... evision ..... ..................
WWI1 ................. I(........... Checked by.A<ae&/~y
I ,~ /S-O
lhoi
63
= . 6qg 11ere
- 6.6?
dsyrw j -
69..z~/4'ec eq .>
twik)4 ~ L
As~,,e AD. 13, 0?f - *
I2~ns
~ ~fS41LCi/csJ$. O7~E
/
S4~'5t~LLC ~3e
2-410Y2=
-2 9'1--), (Kr) 0 -6
eme&f/- /V &P.65
10 e ep ICA
/- -;70(4 ) = /S g"3
0. O' 7L
/ 5J. I ( 0. 021 -S) =
0444-1. & 4 ,)I = V -f S5?. 7 - 8 = / 4 7, C)
1 A2,-56
,e-jse AI#F = 1-,3-0
NewYorkPower A~thority
CacuatonN . ..............................Re i in .......0 ..... ....... .....
Project , 3 Page 14 . o
Subjec s~ ie/a pffT/c Computedv1 ~ /Dae ,/
0 141 I- 7H ^ .. ..... .......... ........ Checked tyy / C 'j p /
V 7- Z
- io.$6k a- a /~2,~99'~~ -4
.3q
,fo,( 7st,
- 94'? (~ '~Y'/' SD
/
I
- /9 8/54
fr~aYLA t~
I' z ~ 8//iOk)-~ /7A9~k
o~f,5 f.~(
4qse 5F-- '-9
IJ; .-- -- -- ,
( a6 el - I 0 f-' 45s, Wre 4:jlztj vw SZ/lc4e-,
C5 2,ff
NepwyorkPower Authority
Catlcu t onNo....................- Revision ..................... .
Project.... ................................................................... .............. age ...... ....... ..
4)dUL- Wl//CkA/46S .. (1WXC -Cheoed by Date.
Ca ~'f
4s~V~o$s.
OftZ~cp~)
iT5~~1233' e a-I =.0
==~~?CX)e/
Is 1 /
111 ., 2
2-)
/~~8 96- ,, 6)(
15213 AL eh
c 3ocj
~~3C - j'~{~.&)~- /~~3 /)k
92.
j3605) ~fh 0~
A)(sI-.
,1;777
(- I
4,
fo ? f ;c5l )3z
,NewYork Power AAihority
Calculation No. ......-s ............ ..... Reviso .............--- -----
Subject -.X6 1'? (7AI W N 0 Conptd by " '. /00?/?
A~l41, .. /C? ;55 ...... ('4AC,................ Checked by.r.c..a.0 1
2-
,;(D C o &~~
- ~?9o { - _ ____
,1
S'-471-/
RX = 6/ 0--fO //9)94r?-l
/~; 9t~9
c5-;'d I
SO99!?la
56 131
/qx 8 J
A,''F
- - L-~
19E3~
/S3S3 2
/Sy 2
46O ~
00017(f~) -- -
105
Cc A
1/ - , 0 3 E
2
A/x(W)
-33
, gwyorkPower iwAuthor'ty S 0 0 O c2O
Cakutabfi No. /.P . i0 ,5 7............ R vso ..........................
Profwc ..................................... .............. ........ page 25 _V d Subj.ect 0..... kS 1 S Zed-7 d-A .. .. ChMkd . Da.. t.e.
=1/- 1 4
_/ /061 C5 dz-:: -----
.i'
7~ 0-
C5 3&6
F-: I
44-2
30Z1 /Znt)
41Ccs~'Iq' 3
(P. (
4)
(#z /A5t4er)
(cd~)
(6 Ax-,/L
~i~iij3 = /6~~3~'n~ -IA5
~
4bto~id1,511,9 i-,,
j1Z
/. r jvy)
N~ewYork~ower Au4tho~ity
C . I b .- - 1
Subjd .J~ .5'~ ....fC /6 4 Y//Okt/ / opte y4Vo
kI4AL .../...... ......... Chcedb Date /o 9
~i e ,1Mae ~ lte
:,il 7~L/
/eIS3 1 t#90 9 15-9 / _/4v -l//
0 ej'l
.&7'0)
4 f ,C:
1503,C-
- NewYorkPower Authority
Subject (fj. ----- Iff0C ... ....L....).Complted by Date
Chiecked by .... D)ate A.Il .If
.Ah: 35cY~
1760#4
1 70'
I-til
'NewYrkPOwer Authority /R3-(~&........................
.............................. I... ..........- ..
Sba j /7jji C /
Revon. ........ -.......... .
Page" ~ 9
Comouated by AXO86. 'ii()1 Checkedby.4- ai
PIPE MATERIAL AND PROPERTIES
Line Designation
Material Pipe O.D. (in)
Schedule thickness (in)
Wt. of Pipe (#/ft) Wt. of Fluid (#/ft)
Wt- -OF-641(#Ift)
Design Conditions
Temperature (IF) Pressure (psi)
Operating Conditions
Temperature (I F) Pressure (psi) Linear Th exp (in/ft) Mean exp (1O0' in/in/OF)
Modulus of Elasticity
Ec (10-6 psi) Eh (10-(psi)
Allowable Stress
Sc (psi) Sh (psi)
ps6
/ f6 2
0. 74
F c .911
s
7,o-37,- -==W0 -6
Sol -G 34t
2.
r
~o~i7t)
~/ D /S-0
NVNYorkPowerCaiculation No. ........ -............... .. 3.4 ....!w .....................
P ro te ct .. ..... ...... .... .. ..................... .............I .....
Subject 5F/ ...... ~ 3~'~ .. .. .. ... .. .. .
0 Revision ..........................
Page C~~..of......;
Computed by ate
Checked by iCC.. Date
(24/
- /60(&. ~ ~s) 9 (o.~sj)
~~%3'
y2
( P7# .3J~;2
F- 760?f2
(/~o?~j( ~) A4AI/'
6,COO1 4-,-
-FIE -I/ 3Y.it
5p
=E5~ ,CS-7 r /
626.~6 f -
TO RplvtI-hl fly,.
Y
Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant P0. Box 215 Buchanan, New York 10511 914 736.8000
OW NewYork Power 40 Authority
Qj,)D~A~fjAAM~4ttLLCON T ROL COPY NO.: 25FROM:-EMERGENCY PLANNING DATE: 8/99
SUBJECT: DISTRIBUTION OF THE INDIAN POINT #3 EMERGENCY PLAN REVISIONS
The enclosed revisions are for your controlled copy of the IP-3 Emergency Plan. .Please discard old sheets, insert new sheets, initial/date this transmittal, and return it to the IP-3 Documents Department. If you have any questions regarding these changes, call Emergency Planning (x84 04).
Thank you.
VOLUME II - EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVATION - IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES
OLD: NEW:
Table of Contents
IP-2103
IP-2302
EP Forms Index
6/99
Rev. 3 Rev. 5
6/99
Table of Contents
IP-2103
IP-2302
EP Forms Index
8/99
Rev. 4 Rev. 6
8/99*Remove the forms for EP-Forms 1A and 1B in the forms section
VOLUME III -EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES
Table of Contents
I P- 1001
6/99
Rev. 15
Table of Contents
I P-1 001
8/99
Rev. 16
I acknowledge the receipt of these revisions to the IP-3 Emergency Plan.
(Date)
7k Is F3
18-JUN-99Page: 19
DISTRIBUTION CONTROL LIST
-icument Name: EMER PLAN
CC-NAME NAME DEPT ----------- ------------------------- -----
o ELLMERS J (TRANS. ONLY) 1 MONTANARELLO M 2 SPOERRY D 3 RES DEPARTMENT MANAGER 4 DECKER V 8 PUBLIC RELATIONS MANAGER 9 PUBLIC RELATIONS MANAGER
10 SHIFT MANAGER 11 CONTROL ROOM 12 COMPUTER SERVICES MANAGE1 13 I&C MANAGER 14 EOF 15 EOF 16 GROSJEAN A 17 GROSJEAN A 18 PATRICK C 19 WPO DOCUMENT CONTROL 22 RESIDENT INSPECTOR 23 MCNAMARA N 24 MCNAMAPA N 25 DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK 27 LEWIS P - VOLUME #1 ONLY 28 AVRAKOTOS N 29 E-PLAN ENGINEER 30 H-PLAN COORDINATOR 31 BAPRANSKI J 32 MURPHY L - VOLUME #1 ONLY 33 LONGO, N.-VOLUME #1 ONLY 34 GREENE D - VOLUME #1 ONLY 35 RAMPOLLA M-VOLUME #1 ONLY
HP WATCH OFFICE SECURITY COMMAND POST SECONDARY ALARM (SAS) SECURITY MANAGER SIMULATOR CONTROL ROOM SIMULATOR INSTRUCT AREA QA MANAGER O.R.G. DEPT. MANAGER SYSTEM ENGINEERING MGR. D&A MANAGER HUGHES J IP-1011 ONLY HUGHES J IP-1011 ONLY NRQ-OPERATIONS ILO-OPERATIONS LRQ-OPERATIONS EOF OPS INSTR
37 38 39 40 41 42
106 107 128 158 211 308 309 319 354 357 376 424
APPRAISAL & COMPLIANCE ADMINI STRATION TRAINING RES REFERENCE LIBRARY PUBLIC RELATIONS PUBLIC RELATIONS DOCUMENT CONTROL DOCUMENT CONTROL
Z COMPUTER SERVICES I &C E-PLAN E-PLAN APPRISAL & COMPLIANCE APPRISAL & COMPLIANCE PUBLIC RELATIONS NUCLEAR ENG. LIBRARY US NRC NRC NRC NRC INPO J A FITZPATRICK E-PLAN' E-PLAN ST. EMERG. 'MGMT. OFFICE DISASTER & EMERGENCY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISASTER & CIVIL DEFENSE OFFICE OF EMERG MANAGE HP - R. DESCHAMPS - RES SECURITY SECURITY SECURITY TRAINING DOCUMENT CONTROL TRAINING QA O.R.G. DEPARTMENT SYSTEM ENGINEERING DESIGN ENGINEERING E-PLAN E-PLAN C. STELLATO/TRAINING L. NUNNO/TRAINING N. TRACEY/TRAINING E-PLAN J. CHIUSANO/TRAINING
LOCATION
WPO/14A 45-3-B I P3
- 45-4-A
#48 46-2-C 46-2-C IP3 IP3 IP3 45-2-A EOF EOF WPO/ 14A WPO/ 14A WPO/ ilL WPO/10-A IP3 OFFSITE OFFSITE OFFSITE OFFSITE OFFSITE EOF EOF
WESCHESTR ROCKLAND ORANGE PUTNAM 45-4-A IP3 IP3 I P3 I P3 IP3 TRAINING TRL #f2A 46-2-B 45-3-H IP3 CON ED CON ED IP3 IP3I IP3 EOF I P3
0o