revenue agencies & businesses working together · –centralized sales tax administration...

24
Southeastern Association of Tax Administrators (SEATA) Tuesday, July 17, 2018 Nashville, Tennessee Presenters Charles Collins, ADP Fred Nicely, Council On State Taxation (COST) Frank O’Connell, Georgia Dep’t of Revenue Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jun-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

Southeastern Association of Tax Administrators (SEATA)

Tuesday, July 17, 2018

Nashville, Tennessee

Presenters

Charles Collins, ADP

Fred Nicely, Council On State Taxation (COST)

Frank O’Connell, Georgia Dep’t of Revenue

Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together

Page 2: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Implement & administer tax levies

consistent with law & regulations

• Provide clear and timely information to

taxpayers & tax professionals

• Ensure high rate of compliance

Tax Agency Objectives.

Page 3: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Highest rate of compliance possible

• Lowest cost of compliance possible

• Few/no audit issues

Taxpayer/Tax Provider Objectives

Page 4: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Implement & administer tax levies

consistent with law

– Input on enacted legislation, regulations,

forms, etc.

– Input on electronic applications

• Provide clear and timely information to

taxpayers & tax professionals

– Feedback on proposed regulations

– Cooperation on getting communication out

Agencies/Business Working Together

Page 5: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Ensure high rate of compliance

– Responding to feedback on problem areas

– Clarity in instructions; “plain language”

– Simple registration process

– Simple filing & payment processes

• electronic processes

– Uniform/simple authorization process

– Publishing administration decisions if possible

Agencies/Business Working Together.

Page 6: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Future Areas

– Expansion of Agency Portals

• More agencies

• More self-service functionality

• Simple use by taxpayer’s 3rd party provider

– More electronic applications

• Use of electronic signatures (POA)

Agencies/Business Working Together .

Page 7: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Whistleblower/Qui Tax Actions

– Illinois Experience

• Class Action Lawsuits

• Contingent Fee Auditing

Concern with Tax Administration

Outside of Tax Agency

Page 8: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Providing Documentation

• Limiting Use of Waivers

• Settlements

– When

– Who

• Total Frustration – Who Do You Contact?

– With Tax Agency

– With Taxpayer

Difficult Audits – Best Practices

Page 9: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Alternative Apportionment

– Burden of Proof

– Guidance

• Nexus Standard

• Forced Combination

• Cost of Performance vs. Market Sourcing

• Reporting Federal Tax Adjustments

Issues with Corporate Income Taxes

Page 10: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• SSUTA – Uniformity & Simplicity

– What impact will Wayfair have?

– Access to Software – TPP or Service

• Nexus Standard

• Base Broadening

– Business-to-Business Transactions

– Review/Eliminating Exemptions

– Taxing Services/Digital Goods

Issues with Sales/Use Taxes

Page 11: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Is it just corporate welfare?– Are some credit/incentives better than others?

• How should compliance with a program be

verified?– Weighing documentation costs v. program incentive

benefits

• What should be the consequences for failure to

comply with an credit/incentive?

– Do claw-back provisions work and/or are they equitable?

Issues with Tax Credit & Incentive

Programs

Page 12: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Should revenue agencies give preference to

certain associations?

– Local v. National

– CPA, Chambers, TP Assoc., Special Interests, Etc.

• Are associations too aggressive or lacking a

complete understanding?

• Formal versus informal comments and/or

meetings – what’s the best approach?

Working with Associations

Page 13: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Purpose – Discuss policy, administration,

dispute resolution, “best practices”

• Make-up: Practitioners, business – large &

small, local govt, academics

• Governance – terms, responsibilities,

expectations of confidentiality?

• Other outreach? Surveys, focus groups?

Commissioners’

Advisory Councils

Page 14: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Should states automatically couple with

federal tax changes?

• How important is uniformity with the IRC?

• Should states have more input before

Congress changes the IRC?

• How are the states dealing w/recent changes:

– Federal tax reform?

– New federal partnership audit regime?

Dealing with Federal Tax Changes

Page 15: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Four Administrative Scorecards

– State Administrative Practices Scorecard

– Unclaimed Property Practices Scorecard

– International Property Tax Scorecard

– Sales Tax Systems Scorecard

• Goal is to work with both the legislative and

executive branches of state government to

improve state and local tax administration

– Not an evaluation of revenue agencies

COST Administrative

Scorecards

Page 16: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Areas Evaluated:

– Independent Tax Dispute Forum

– Pay-to-Play Tax Litigation System

– Even Statute of Limitations/Interest Rates

– Adequate Appeal/Protest Period

– Return Due Date/Automatic Extension

– Filing IRS (RAR) Changes

– Transparency

COST State Administrative

Practices Scorecard

Page 17: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

State Tax Administration

Overall Grades

HI

ME

RI

VT

NH MA

NY

CT

PA NJ

DC

DE

WV

NC

SC

GA

FL

ILOH

MIWI

KY

TN

ALMS

AR

LA

TX

OK

MOKS

IA

MN

ND

SD

NE

NMAZ

CO

UT

WY

MT

WA

OR

ID

NV

CA

VA

MD

WA

AK

IN

A

B

C

D

Page 18: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Three Areas Evaluated

– Transparency

– Simplicity and Consistency

– Procedural Fairness

• U.S., as a whole, did not do as well as

other countries: Canada, United Kingdom,

Australia, Hong Kong, & South Africa

COST/IPTI International Property

Tax Administration Scorecard

Page 19: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

Property Tax Overall Grade

HI

ME

RI

VT

NH MA

NY

CT

PA NJ

DC

DE

WV

NC

SC

GA

FL

ILOH

MIWI

KY

TN

ALMS

AR

LA

TX

OK

MOKS

IA

MN

ND

SD

NE

NMAZ

CO

UT

WY

MT

WA

OR

ID

NV

CA

VA

MD

WA

AK

IN

A

B

C

D

Page 20: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Six Areas Evaluated

– Exemption for Business-to-Business Transactions

– Fair Sales Tax Administration

– Centralized Sales Tax Administration

– Simplification & Transparency

– Reasonable Tax Payment Administration

– Fair Audit/Refund Procedures

– Other Issues Impacting Fair Tax Administration

• What the Scorecard Does Not Grade

– Tax Rate Differences

– Tax Base Breadth (other than Taxing Business Inputs)

Sales Tax Systems Scorecard

Page 21: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

Sales Tax Systems ScorecardOverall Grade

States’ Overall Scorecard Grades: SSUTA States

AK

HI

ME

RI

VT

NH

MANY

CT

PANJ

DC

DE

WV

NC

SC

GA

FL

ILOH

IN

MIWI

KY

TN

ALMS

AR

LATX

OK

MOKS

IA

MN

ND

SD

NE

NMAZ

CO

UT

WY

MT

WA

OR

ID

NV

CA

VA

MD

Average score of SSUTA

states: B (12 pts.)

Average score of non-SSUTA

states: D+ (19 pts.)

SSUTA Full Member

N/A 0-9 10-13 14-17 18-22 22+

Page 22: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

• Seven Areas Evaluated

– B-to-B Transactions Exempt?

– Periods of Limitations

– Independent Appeals Process?

– Contingent Fee Audits Banned?

– Gift Certificates Exempt?

– Penalties

– Treatment of Interest

Unclaimed Property Scorecard

Page 23: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

Unclaimed PropertyOverall Grade

HI

ME

RI

VT

NH MA

NY

CT

PA NJ

DC

DE

WV

NC

SC

GA

FL

ILOH

MIWI

KY

TN

ALMS

AR

LA

TX

OK

MOKS

IA

MN

ND

SD

NE

NMAZ

CO

UT

WY

MT

WA

OR

ID

NV

CA

VA

MD

WA

AK

IN

A

B

C

D

Page 24: Revenue Agencies & Businesses Working Together · –Centralized Sales Tax Administration –Simplification & Transparency –Reasonable Tax Payment Administration –Fair Audit/Refund

Questions?

THANK YOU!

Your Logo

Charles Collins, ADP

Fred Nicely, Council On State Taxation

Frank O’Connell, Georgia Dep’t of Revenue