reversible inactivation of the ventral auditory brainstem by cooling eric verschooten, myles mc...

1
-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 tim e (m s) u.a. D 0923 trial1 e2:x-correlogram s ofspikes in M N TB -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 tim e (m s) u.a. D 0923 trial1 e5:x-correlogram s ofspikes in M N TB Reversible inactivation of the ventral auditory brainstem by cooling Eric Verschooten, Myles Mc Laughlin, Philip X. Joris Lab. of Auditory Neurophysiology, K.U.Leuven, Leuven Belgium Background Rate & temperature curves delay in neurophonic delay in single units The basioccipital bone of barbiturate-anesthetized cats was reached using a ventral transpharyngeal approach. The trapezoid body was exposed by drilling rostrocaudal slits on both sides of the midline, allowing visualization of the abducens nerves. On the dura of one side, we placed a cryoloop. Metal electrodes were mounted in a 5 channel microdrive (1-4 M, TREC) and were placed at an angle of 20-25 degrees, opposite to the site of placement of the cryoloop, entering the brainstem at the mediolateral and rostrocaudal level of the rootlets of the abducens nerve. We monitored the sound-driven activity of neurons which showed monaural contralateral responses, while cooling the brainstem. MNTB neurons were identified by a prepotential. Axonal recordings were classified on the basis of the PST histogram to short tone bursts. Extracellular recordings were obtained in the MNTB and neurophonic recordings in the MSO and MNTB from 5 cats. The neural signal was amplified, filtered (10-3000 Hz) (EX1 and EX4-400, Dagan), and sampled (RX8 sys3, TDT, 50 or 100 kHz/channel). Stimuli were a) monaural tone bursts @ CF and b) dichotic uncorrelated noise bursts: 50-50000 Hz, 1000ms, 50-80dB Cooling by a small foot (foot surface: 3x7mm) positioned on the pyramidal tract at the level of the TB. Coolant: methanol passively cooled with dry ice, suction pump (FMI). We constructed a cryoloop, through which methanol at -30 to -40°C is pumped as a Methods Conclusions A) 2D multicolor representation of the evolving cross correlogram between the baseline neurophonic to broadband noise at normal body temperature (bottom traces), and the neurophonic during cooling. The x-axis is time lag. The colors are normalized to the baseline. B) Left panel shows neurophonic recordings in the MSO (recording depth 3134 µm) Right panel shows neurophonic recordings in the NMTB at approx. 700 µm. C) Examples of correlograms (randomly chosen horizontal sections from plot A). D) Correlogram maximal amplitudes as a function of time. The MSO neurophonic was much less affected in the amplitude than the MNTB. There was little response to ipsilateral stimulation at these recording sites. E) Delays measured from the correlogram analysis, for both recording sites and for ipsi- and contralateral stimulation. Colored curves show population responses. Black and purple curves shows single unit responses (next column). 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 50 100 150 200 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0948 trial7 e4 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0948 trial2 e4 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 20 40 60 80 100 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0948 trial1 e4 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0945 trial2 e4 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0927 trial8 e5 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 5 10 15 20 0 50 100 150 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 5 10 15 20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0927 trial3 e2 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0923 trial1 e5 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0923 trial1 e2 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 100 200 300 400 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0920 trial6 e3 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 5 10 15 20 0 100 200 300 400 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 5 10 15 20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0920 trial5 e3 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 50 100 150 200 250 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 2 4 6 8 10 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0920 trial3 e1 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 spike rate [spikes/s] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 tim e [m in] Tem perature [C ] D 0920 trial1 e2 S pikerate/tem perature versus tim e Fig. 1 Axons with primary-like responses are located in the dorsal part of the TB (red). Axons with primary-like-with-notch responses are located in the ventral part. (Smith et al., 1993) Neurons in the MSO are sensitive to interaural time differences (ITDs) and exhibit a “best delay” i.e. an ITD to which they are maximally responsive. This sensitivity is generally seen as the outcome of a coincidence mechanism operating on phase-locked excitatory inputs. Besides excitatory inputs from spherical bushy cells in the cochlear nucleus, the MSO also receives inhibitory inputs from the lateral and medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (LNTB and MNTB). The role of these inhibitory inputs is less clear. Our goal is to study the role of inhibition in ITD-sensitivity. The mechanism underlying the best delay is controversial. Jeffress (1948) proposed that axonal delays are the origin of the best delay. Schroeder (1977) proposed that cochlear disparities are at its origin. Brand et al. (2002) proposed that timed inhibition is essential: in their model inhibition from the MNTB precedes the EPSP from the excitatory input from the same ear, and thereby delays the effective excitation. Neurons of the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body (MNTB) provide inhibitory input to binaural nuclei in the auditory brainstem and thereby play an important role in the processing of binaural cues for sound localization. To examine the role of this inhibitory pathway, we take advantage of its anatomical organization. The MNTB receives excitatory inputs from globular bushy cells, whose axons run in the ventral component of the trapezoid body (fig.1 and fig.2) Excitatory inputs to the binaural nuclei run in the dorsal component of the trapezoid body. By blocking the ventral component, we can potentially suppress the inhibitory pathway without affecting the excitatory pathway. 10 1 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Frequency (kH z) Threshold (dB S PL) D0920C <22-4-THR> (50) 18.3 dB S PL @ 7.464 kHz SR = 44.9 sp/s before cooling aftercooling -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 tim e [m s] am plitude [au] D 0923 trial1 e5:overlayplotand m ean spike -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 tim e [m s] am plitude [au] D 0920 trial5 e3:overlayplotand m ean spike -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 tim e [m s] am plitude [au] D 0927 trial3 e2:overlayplotand m ean spike -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 tim e [m s] am plitude [au] D 0948 trial7 e4:overlayplotand m ean spike 10 1.2 10 1.3 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Frequency (kHz) Threshold (dB SP L) D 0923b <5-1-TH R> (15) 0.3 dB SP L @ 19.48 kHz SR = 126 sp/s 0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 30 dB SPL 2396 spikes Tim e (m s) Spike count 1.5 2 2.5 3 20 30 40 50 60 70 Frequency (kH z) Threshold (dB S PL) D0927C <12-2-THR > (21) 26.3 dB S P L @ 2.196 kHz S R = 4.65 sp/s 0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 70 dB SPL 740 spikes Tim e (m s) S pike count 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Frequency (H z) Threshold (dB SP L) D 0948b <12-1-THR > (258) 45.8 dB S P L @ 0.455 kHz S R = 2.66 sp/s 0 10 20 30 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 75 dB SPL 1083 spikes Tim e (m s) S pike count Cooling the brainstem at the location of the TB can inactivate axons projecting to the MNTB, and this inactivation is reversible. Neural response rates recorded from cells in the MNTB are monotonically related to cooling temperature: the effect of cooling on response rate is gradual rather than all or none. Cooling introduces a delay in MNTB and MSO responses. Supported by FWO (G.0633.07 and G.0714.09) and BOF (OT/05/57 and OT/09/50). Fig. 2 Simplified view of the binaural pathway and experimental setup. AN Auditory Nerve, CN cochlear nucleus, SBC spherical bushy cells, GBC globular bushy cells, LNTB lateral nucleus of the trapezoid body, MSO medial superior olive, LL lateral lemniscus, IC inferior colliculus, MNTB medial nucleus of the trapezoid body, TB-dc dorsal component of the trapezoid body, TB-vc ventral component of the trapezoid body. A B C D -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 tim e (m s) a.u. D 0923 trial1 e3:x-correlogram s ofneurophonic in M N TB -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 a.u. tim e (m s) D 0923 trial1 e4:x-correlogram s ofneurophonic in M SO A B C D A) 2D cross correlograms as in previous column, but now based on two MNTB single units at depths of 628µm (electrode 2) and 264µm (electrode5). Responses are to contralateral noise. B) Examples of correlograms (randomly chosen horizontal sections from plot A). C) Correlogram maximal amplitudes as a function of time. D) Delays measured from the correlogram analysis. These delays are compared with the delays of the population responses in panel D of the poster column to the left. Cooling causes a graded and reversible decrease in spike rate Cooling causes a graded delay in ongoing timing of population responses Cooling causes a graded delay in ongoing timing of single units -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 tim e [m s] am plitude [au] D 0923 trial1 e5:overlayplotand m ean spike 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 tim e (s) delay (m s) D 0923 trial1:tem perature dependentdelay forallresponses M NTB:contra stim ulated M NTB:ipsi stim ulated MSO:contra stim ulated MSO:ipsi stim ulated M NTB:e5 M NTB:e2 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 0 100 200 300 400 500 tim e (s) m ax.am plitude (a.u.) D 0923 trial1:m ax.am plitude ofx-correlogram M NTB:contra stim ulation MNTB:ipsi stim ulation 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 tim e (s) m ax.am plitude (a.u.) D 0923 trial1:m ax.am plitude ofx-correlogram M SO :contra stim ulation MSO:ipsistim ulation 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 tim e (s) delay (m s) D 0923 trial1:tem perature dependentdelay in the M N TB (only spikes) electrode2 electrode 5 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 D 0923 trial1:m ax.am plitude ofx-correlogram (spikes) tim e (s) a.u. electrode 2 electrode 5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 tim e [m s] am plitude [au] D 0923 trial5 e2:overlayplotand m ean spike

Upload: deirdre-fox

Post on 18-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reversible inactivation of the ventral auditory brainstem by cooling Eric Verschooten, Myles Mc Laughlin, Philip X. Joris Lab. of Auditory Neurophysiology,

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

time (ms)

u.a.

D0923 trial1 e2: x-correlograms of spikes in MNTB

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

time (ms)

u.a.

D0923 trial1 e5: x-correlograms of spikes in MNTB

Reversible inactivation of the ventral auditory brainstem by coolingEric Verschooten, Myles Mc Laughlin, Philip X. Joris

Lab. of Auditory Neurophysiology, K.U.Leuven, Leuven Belgium

Background Rate & temperature curves delay in neurophonic delay in single units

• The basioccipital bone of barbiturate-anesthetized cats was reached using a ventral transpharyngeal approach. The trapezoid body was exposed by drilling rostrocaudal slits on both sides of the midline, allowing visualization of the abducens nerves. On the dura of one side, we placed a cryoloop.• Metal electrodes were mounted in a 5 channel microdrive (1-4 M, TREC) and were placed at an angle of 20-25 degrees, opposite to the site of placement of the cryoloop, entering the brainstem at the mediolateral and rostrocaudal level of the rootlets of the abducens nerve. We monitored the sound-driven activity of neurons which showed monaural contralateral responses, while cooling the brainstem. MNTB neurons were identified by a prepotential. Axonal recordings were classified on the basis of the PST histogram to short tone bursts.• Extracellular recordings were obtained in the MNTB and neurophonic recordings in the MSO and MNTB from 5 cats. The neural signal was amplified, filtered (10-3000 Hz) (EX1 and EX4-400, Dagan), and sampled (RX8 sys3, TDT, 50 or 100 kHz/channel). • Stimuli were a) monaural tone bursts @ CF and b) dichotic uncorrelated noise bursts: 50-50000 Hz, 1000ms, 50-80dB •Cooling by a small foot (foot surface: 3x7mm) positioned on the pyramidal tract at the level of the TB. Coolant: methanol passively cooled with dry ice, suction pump (FMI). We constructed a cryoloop, through which methanol at -30 to -40°C is pumped as a coolant. The temperature of the cryoloop is constantly monitored and logged with a thermocouple fixed to the exit tubing.

Methods

Conclusions

A) 2D multicolor representation of the evolving cross correlogram between the baseline neurophonic to broadband noise at normal body temperature (bottom traces), and the neurophonic during cooling. The x-axis is time lag. The colors are normalized to the baseline.

B) Left panel shows neurophonic recordings in the MSO (recording depth 3134 µm)Right panel shows neurophonic recordings in the NMTB at approx. 700 µm.

C) Examples of correlograms (randomly chosen horizontal sections from plot A).

D) Correlogram maximal amplitudes as a function of time. The MSO neurophonic was much less affected in the amplitude than the MNTB. There was little response to ipsilateral stimulation at these recording sites.

E) Delays measured from the correlogram analysis, for both recording sites and for ipsi- and contralateral stimulation. Colored curves show population responses. Black and purple curves shows single unit responses (next column).

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

50

100

150

200

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0948 trial7 e4 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0948 trial2 e4 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

20

40

60

80

100

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0948 trial1 e4 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0945 trial2 e4 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400

50

100

150

200

250

300

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0927 trial8 e5 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 5 10 15 200

50

100

150

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 5 10 15 20-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0927 trial3 e2 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0923 trial1 e5 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0923 trial1 e2 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 160

100

200

300

400

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0920 trial6 e3 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 5 10 15 200

100

200

300

400

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 5 10 15 20-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0920 trial5 e3 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 2 4 6 8 100

50

100

150

200

250

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 2 4 6 8 10-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0920 trial3 e1 Spikerate/temperature versus time

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

spik

e ra

te [

spik

es/s

]

0 5 10 15 20 25 30-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

time [min]

Tem

pera

ture

[C

]

D0920 trial1 e2 Spikerate/temperature versus time

Fig. 1 Axons with primary-like responses are located in the dorsal part of the TB (red). Axons with primary-like-with-notch responses are located in the ventral part. (Smith et al., 1993)

Neurons in the MSO are sensitive to interaural time differences (ITDs) and exhibit a “best delay” i.e. an ITD to which they are maximally responsive. This sensitivity is generally seen as the outcome of a coincidence mechanism operating on phase-locked excitatory inputs. Besides excitatory inputs from spherical bushy cells in the cochlear nucleus, the MSO also receives inhibitory inputs from the lateral and medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (LNTB and MNTB). The role of these inhibitory inputs is less clear. Our goal is to study the role of inhibition in ITD-sensitivity. The mechanism underlying the best delay is controversial. Jeffress (1948) proposed that axonal delays are the origin of the best delay. Schroeder (1977) proposed that cochlear disparities are at its origin. Brand et al. (2002) proposed that timed inhibition is essential: in their model inhibition from the MNTB precedes the EPSP from the excitatory input from the same ear, and thereby delays the effective excitation.

Neurons of the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body (MNTB) provide inhibitory input to binaural nuclei in the auditory brainstem and thereby play an important role in the processing of binaural cues for sound localization. To examine the role of this inhibitory pathway, we take advantage of its anatomical organization. The MNTB receives excitatory inputs from globular bushy cells, whose axons run in the ventral component of the trapezoid body (fig.1 and fig.2) Excitatory inputs to the binaural nuclei run in the dorsal component of the trapezoid body. By blocking the ventral component, we can potentially suppress the inhibitory pathway without affecting the excitatory pathway.

101

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Frequency (kHz)

Thr

esho

ld (

dB S

PL)

D0920C <22-4-THR> (50) 18.3 dB SPL @ 7.464 kHz SR = 44.9 sp/s

before cooling

after cooling

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

time [ms]

ampl

itude

[au

]

D0923 trial1 e5: overlayplot and mean spike

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

time [ms]

ampl

itude

[au

]

D0920 trial5 e3: overlayplot and mean spike

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

time [ms]

ampl

itude

[au

]

D0927 trial3 e2: overlayplot and mean spike

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

time [ms]

ampl

itude

[au

]

D0948 trial7 e4: overlayplot and mean spike

101.2

101.3

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Frequency (kHz)

Thr

esho

ld (

dB S

PL)

D0923b <5-1-THR> (15) 0.3 dB SPL @ 19.48 kHz SR = 126 sp/s

0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

7030 dB SPL 2396 spikes

Time (ms)

Spi

ke c

ount

D0923b <5-2-SPL> --- 9/13 x 200 x 110 ms --- varied Level --- burst: 25 ms

PST histogramNbin=250

Window : 30 msAll reps

1.5 2 2.5 320

30

40

50

60

70

Frequency (kHz)T

hres

hold

(dB

SP

L)

D0927C <12-2-THR> (21) 26.3 dB SPL @ 2.196 kHz SR = 4.65 sp/s

0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

D0927C <12-3-SPL> --- 12/12 x 200 x 110 ms --- varied Level --- burst: 25 ms

70 dB SPL 740 spikes

Time (ms)

Spi

ke c

ount PST histogram

Nbin=250 Window : 30 ms

All reps

100 200 300 400 500 600 70040

45

50

55

60

65

70

Frequency (Hz)

Thr

esho

ld (

dB S

PL)

D0948b <12-1-THR> (258) 45.8 dB SPL @ 0.455 kHz SR = 2.66 sp/s

0 10 20 30 400

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

75 dB SPL 1083 spikes

Time (ms)S

pike

cou

nt

D0948b <12-2-SPL> --- 11/11 x 100 x 110 ms --- varied Level --- burst: 25 ms

PST histogramNbin=400

Window : 40 msAll reps

• Cooling the brainstem at the location of the TB can inactivate axons projecting to the MNTB, and this inactivation is reversible.• Neural response rates recorded from cells in the MNTB are monotonically related to cooling temperature: the effect of cooling on response rate is gradual rather than all or none.• Cooling introduces a delay in MNTB and MSO responses.

Supported by FWO (G.0633.07 and G.0714.09) and BOF (OT/05/57 and OT/09/50).

Fig. 2 Simplified view of the binaural pathway and experimental setup.AN Auditory Nerve, CN cochlear nucleus, SBC spherical bushy cells, GBC globular bushy cells, LNTB lateral nucleus of the trapezoid body, MSO medial superior olive, LL lateral lemniscus, IC inferior colliculus, MNTB medial nucleus of the trapezoid body, TB-dc dorsal component of the trapezoid body, TB-vc ventral component of the trapezoid body.

A

B

C

D

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

time (ms)

a.u.

D0923 trial1 e3: x-correlograms of neurophonic in MNTB

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15-1000

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

a.u.

time (ms)

D0923 trial1 e4: x-correlograms of neurophonic in MSO

A

B

C D

A) 2D cross correlograms as in previous column, but now based on two MNTB single units at depths of 628µm (electrode 2) and 264µm (electrode5). Responses are to contralateral noise.

B) Examples of correlograms (randomly chosen horizontal sections from plot A).C) Correlogram maximal amplitudes as a function of time.D) Delays measured from the correlogram analysis. These delays are compared with the delays of

the population responses in panel D of the poster column to the left.

Cooling causes a graded and reversible decrease in spike rate Cooling causes a graded delay in ongoing timing of population responses

Cooling causes a graded delay in ongoing timing of single units

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

time [ms]

ampl

itude

[au

]

D0923 trial1 e5: overlayplot and mean spike

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40000

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

time (s)

dela

y (m

s)

D0923 trial1: temperature dependent delay for all responses

MNTB: contra stimulated

MNTB: ipsi stimulated

MSO:contra stimulated

MSO: ipsi stimulated

MNTB: e5

MNTB: e2

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40000

100

200

300

400

500

time (s)

max

. am

plitu

de (

a.u.

)

D0923 trial1: max. amplitude of x-correlogram

MNTB: contra stimulation

MNTB: ipsi stimulation

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

time (s)

max

. am

plitu

de (

a.u.

)

D0923 trial1: max. amplitude of x-correlogram

MSO: contra stimulation

MSO: ipsi stimulation

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

time (s)

dela

y (m

s)

D0923 trial1: temperature dependent delay in the MNTB (only spikes)

electrode2

electrode 5

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40000

20

40

60

80

100

120

140D0923 trial1: max. amplitude of x-correlogram (spikes)

time (s)

a.u.

electrode 2

electrode 5

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

time [ms]

ampl

itude

[au

]

D0923 trial5 e2: overlayplot and mean spike