review: cognitive assessments ii ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) item difficulty/discrimination...

21
Review: Cognitive Assessments II • Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) • Item difficulty/discrimination relationship • Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes • Open-/Close-ended item construction +/- • Factors affecting response rate

Upload: dominick-hart

Post on 31-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Review: Cognitive Assessments II

• Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic)

• Item difficulty/discrimination relationship

• Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes

• Open-/Close-ended item construction +/-

• Factors affecting response rate

Page 2: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Psychomotor Assessments

HPHE 3150Dr. Ayers

Page 3: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

DISCLAIMER

Productvs

Process Testingch. 11

Page 4: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Guidelines for Sport Skills Testing andMotor Performance Tests

• acceptable reliability and validity

• simple to administer and take

• easy to understand instructions

• inexpensive & do not require extensive equipment

• reasonable time for preparation and administration

Page 5: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

• involve only one participant• teacher must assess EACH student individually

• encourage correct form

• suitable difficulty

• interesting and meaningful

• exclude extraneous variables

• provide for accurate scoring

Page 6: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

• provide target scoring guidelines (if accuracy matters)

• sufficient trials

• yield diagnostic scores

Page 7: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Effective Testing Procedures

• Pretest Dutiestime, forms, procedures, instructions

• Testing Dutieslocation, materials, cheating, safety, absences,

make-ups

• Posttest Dutiestranscription, item analysis (practical value;

construct validation), reporting, confidentiality

Page 8: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Developing Psychomotor Tests

Wilson’s (1993) modified 10-step flowchart (p. 284-6)

Review criteria for a good testAnalyze sport/activity to select critical elements to testReview the literatureSelect/Construct test itemsDetermine the exact testing proceduresPeer ReviewPilot TestLook at reliability, validity, objectivityEstablish norms or standardsConstruct test manual to fully describe testReevaluate the instrument occasionally

Page 9: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Issues in Skills Testing

• In addition to reliability and validity(the most important issues)

• Feasibility

• Testing methodObjective skills tests?Alternative/authentic assessment? – See chapter

14

Page 10: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Skills Test Classification

• ObjectiveAccuracy-based (targets)

Repetitive Performance (wall-volley; process matters)

Total Body Movement (focus; game-like or product-based?)

Distance or Power (focus; game-like or product-based?)

Page 11: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

IMPORTANT TEACHING POINT

Teach force/speed

BEFORE accuracy

Page 12: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Subjective Rating Scales

• RelativeRank-order value? +/-

• AbsoluteEvaluation against a fixed standard

Using critical elements helps

• Common ErrorsHalo Effect (bias for/against performer)"Standard" Error (judges employ different perspectives)Central-tendency (hesitancy to assign extreme values)

Which of these islike norm-referencedassessment?

Page 13: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Rating Scales Suggestions

• Develop well-constructed scales

• Train raters well

• Explain common rating errors to raters

• Permit ample time to observe performance

• If possible, use multiple raters

Page 14: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Developing Well-Constructed Scales

• State objectives in terms of observable behavior

• Select traits that determine success

• Define selected traits in observable behavior

Page 15: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

• Select and develop the rating instrument

• Define degrees of success

• Test and revise the rating scale

• Use the scale in an actual testing situation

Page 16: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Ability or Skill?

• Abilitygeneral, innate psychomotor trait (overarm throw)

• Skillspecific, learned psychomotor capacity (vb spike)

• Specificitydetermined with concurrent validity (sport-specific)

Page 17: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Measurement Aspects of the Domain of Human Performance

(abilities)

Muscular StrengthSpeedAgilityAnaerobic PowerFlexibilityBalanceKinesthetic perception

Tell a friend onespecific exampleof two different ability measures

Page 18: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Purposes of Human Performance Testing and Analysis

Selection

Classification

DiagnosisTell another friend one

specific exampleof how to use testing to

do one of these

Page 19: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

Effective testing consists of . . .

• Including sport relevant variables

• Selecting reliable and valid tests

• Developing sport specific protocols

• Controlling test administration

• Maintaining individuals’ rights to privacy

• Repeating the tests periodically

• Interpreting the results for the performer and interested parties (e.g., coaches, parents, etc.)

Page 20: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

PsychomotorAssignment

• With a partner: • Find 1 skill test and 1 ability psychomotor test that

you think will be useful to you professionally and bring a copy to our next class

Description, equipment, procedures, recording form, standards (if applicable)

• We will select a few of these to conduct in lab on Friday, so choose carefully!

Page 21: Review: Cognitive Assessments II Ambiguity (extrinsic/intrinsic) Item difficulty/discrimination relationship Questionnaires assess opinions/attitudes Open-/Close-ended

PsychomotorAssessments

• Explain why one thing you learned today will matter to you as a professional