review planning meeting for

----------------Name Surname

Job Title

Time

Add start and finish

Welcome/introductions of review team

Purpose of meeting

Code of conduct and team working

     Partnership with the Project Team

Gateway Review environment

        Purpose and content of the specific Gate

Availability of support from 4ps

        Nature of activities

        Use of the groups skills

Tools available (i.e. workbooks and templates)

Potential issues for the review

agenda – first session review team only

Time

Add start and finish

Welcome/introductions

Code of conduct

Overview of 4ps Gateway Process

Presentation on the current status of the project by the PO

Purpose and content of the specific Gate Review

Identifying issues, documentation, stakeholders, areas for specific interest

Action planning

Providing access to documentation, timetabling interviews,

domestic arrangements

Wrap up/evaluation

agenda – second session review and projects team

what is a gateway review?

• A Peer review process applied to a project at key decision points in it’s life cycle, to;

• Provides assurance it can progress successfully to the next stage, and thereby

• Facilitate the delivery of better quality projects for local authorities

• Better scoping of projects

• Faster delivery of benefits

• Appropriate structure of contracts

• Better VFM

what are the benefits? (1)

The 4ps Gateway Process provides assurance and support for Project Owners by ensuring that:

• The best available skills and experience are deployed on the project

• All stakeholders fully support the project’s status and the issues involved

• There is assurance that the project can progress successfully to the next stage of development or implementation

• An unbiased assessment is carried out by independent teams

what are the benefits? (2)

The 4ps Gateway Process provides assurance and support for Project Owners by ensuring that:

• More realistic time and cost targets are achieved for projects

• Knowledge and skills among local government staff are improved through participation in review teams

• Advice and guidance to project teams are provided by fellow practitioners

• Carried out in partnership with the project team

Gateway Reviews

Best Practice Development

Improved Project Delivery

Improved Authority Capability

Activities Outcomes

Better Skilled Staff

……… …to improve project delivery

building the capacity of local authorities

project owner ownership (1)

• Always regarded as client for the report

• Consulted as to the issues the teams will concentrate on

• Privacy of results:

• Copy to PO only

• PO can use to best advantage

• 2nd copy to 4ps Gateway Team for extraction of generic lessons learnt

• Post review the 4ps Gateway Team will ask PO for permission to share the report with others within 4ps – this is not mandatory

• 4ps Executive will also discuss other 4ps services that may be appropriate for the project

project owner ownership (2)

• At the request of the PO issues can be classified as Red / Amber / Green

• Red – one or more issues are critical and must be addressed before proceeding

(it does not mean stop)

• Amber – some issues are critical before the next review

• Green – these issues are potential areas for improvement

the generic gateway process

Procurement Projects

Develop Business Case

Develop Procurement

Strategy

Competitive Procurement

Award and Implement Contract

Manage Contract

Closure

Develop Business Case

Execute Programme

Close Programme

Contributes

Gateway 1 Business

Justification

Gateway 2 Procurement Strategy

Gateway 3 Investment

Decision

Gateway 4 Readiness for Service

Gateway 5 Benefits

Realisation

Gateway 0 Strategic

Assessment

Gateway 0 Strategic

Assessment

Gateway 0 Strategic

Assessment

100%

Whole Life Expenditure

Confirm Justificatio

n

OJEU Contract Award

In-Service

Confirm Benefits

Time

Opportunity to Influence Outcome

0%

Confirmstrateg

y

Strategic

Assessment

Business

Justification

Procurement

Approach

Competitive

Procurement

Readiness for

Service

Benefits

Evaluation

project phases

Team meeting

PO meeting

PO report meeting

Fact finding Fact finding Fact finding

Report writing Report writing Report writing

Report Template Preparation

Emerging findings with PO/Project Director/Project

Manager

Emerging findings with PO/Project

Director/Project Manager

Typical 3 Day ReviewDay 1 Day 2 Day 3

Interviews to be loaded into first two days and to be avoided on Day 3.

multi - tasking essential

Delete following Gate overview slides as appropriate

• Review the business need

• Supported by users and stakeholders

• Contributes to the Authorities strategy.

• Management of project or programme

• Managing the main project risks

• Financial provision for the project through to next stage (Gateway Review 1) properly resourced and authorised.

gateway 0 – strategic assessment

• Robustness of business case

• Affordability and achievability

• Appropriate options explored and likely VFM

• Feasibility study has been completed satisfactorily

• Internal and external authority for the project.

• Risk management plans

• Confirm that the scope and requirements specifications are realistic, clear and unambiguous.

• Intended outcomes, timescales considered.

• Plans for the next stage.

gateway 1 – business justification

• Confirm outline business case

• Appropriate & Robust procurement strategy

• Realistic plan through to completion.

• Project controls and organisation are defined, financial controls are in place and the resources are available.

• Funding availability for the whole project.

• Development and delivery approach and mechanisms

• Supplier market capability and track record

• Appropriate project performance measures and tools

gateway 2 – procurement strategy

• Business case and benefits plan

• Statutory and procedural requirements followed

• Outputs/outcomes on time,budget and VFM

• Management controls.

• Continuing support for the project.

• Approved procurement strategy followed.

• Achievable plans

• Business prepared to implement

• Risk management and change management plans

• Technical implications have been addressed.

gateway 3 – investment decision

• properly completed contract

• business case is still valid

• projected business benefit remains

• processes and procedures in place

• all necessary testing is done

• contingency and reversion arrangements.

• risks and issues managed effectively

• The business has the necessary resources

• Ready to implement business change.

• agreed plans for roll-out

• Appropriate governance processes

gateway 4 – readiness for service

• business case justification review

• anticipated benefits being delivered.

• necessary resources to project manage

• continuity of key personnel involved

• changes agreed have not compromised the deal

• Adaptability of the contract to changing circumstances

• Ongoing contract development to improve value for money.

• Confirm that there are plans to manage the contract to its conclusion.

• Where applicable, confirm the validity of exit strategy and arrangements for re-competition.

gateway 5 – benefits evaluation

The teams will:

This should be a statement of principles that every member will adhere to ensure a consistent professional approach in interactions with individuals and dealings and attitude to the review and agreed with the Project Team. This must be produced by the review team in the first session of the day and agreed with the project team in the afternoon.

code of conduct

some issues/topics for the review

• ….to be agreed with the Project Team (correct for Gate and scope of review)

To be completed during Planning Meeting

people and documents to see

People (role or individual)

• …

Documents (see lists in workbook)

• …

review logistics

• Documentation requested needs to be made available at least one week before the start of the review

• At least one, preferably two rooms available throughout the review

• Access, car parking and security passes, if necessary

• Interviews to start from ???? on first day and ???? on second

• Time for interviews and gap between (ie 45minute discussions followed by 15minutes to confer)

• Preference for interviewers to work together but may need to break into groups

• Refreshments – working lunch and refreshments during day

• Equipment needed (ie access to printers, conference phones for telephone interviews, LCD projector?)