reviewers: drs. daniel heng and lori wood date posted: june 18/2008
DESCRIPTION
Overall Survival with Sunitinib vs. Interferon for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma AUTHORS: RA Figlin, TE Hutson, P Tomczak, MD Michaelson, RM Bukowski, S Negrier, X Huang, ST Kim, I Chen, RJ Motzer ASCO 2008 Abs 5024. Reviewers: Drs. Daniel Heng and Lori Wood Date posted: June 18/2008. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
www.OncologyEducation.ca
Overall Survival with Sunitinib vs. Interferon for
Metastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaAUTHORS: RA Figlin, TE Hutson, P Tomczak, MD Michaelson, RM Bukowski,
S Negrier, X Huang, ST Kim, I Chen, RJ MotzerASCO 2008 Abs 5024
Reviewers: Drs. Daniel Heng and Lori Wood
Date posted: June 18/2008
www.OncologyEducation.ca
RSunitinib 50 mg PO OD (4/2wks on/off)N=375
IFN-alfa 9 MU SC 3/wkN=375
750 patients
Treatment naive Metastatic clear-
cell renal cellcarcinoma
MSKCC Risk Profiles:Favorable 36%
Intermediate 57%Poor 7%
Prior Nephrectomy
www.OncologyEducation.ca
RESULTS
Suntinib IFN-alpha p-value
Response Rate (%) 47 12 <0.000001
Median PFS (mos)MSKCC Risk PFS (95%CI):
Favorable
Intermediate
Poor
11
14.5 (11.3-16.8)
10.6 (8.2-10.9)
3.7 (2.0-9.8)
5
7.9 (7-10.5)
3.8 (3.6-4.0)
1.2 (1.0-2.4)
<0.000001
OS
(median, mos)26.4 21.8
0.051 log rank
0.0128 wilcoxon
www.OncologyEducation.ca
Final Overall Survival Data
www.OncologyEducation.ca
STUDY COMMENTARY
•59% of patients in the interferon group had second-line treatment including:
•33% with sunitinib, 32% with another VEGF inhibitor
•The traditional gold standard Log rank p value weights all patient events and time points equally throughout the study. p=0.051.
•The secondary prespecified Wilcoxon p value places more weight on early rather than later patient events and time points. p=0.0128.
•Calculating the p value while censoring patients with second-line treatment produced significant results but this introduced bias as there likely was a systematic difference in patients that were censored.
•Poor risk patients only accounted for 7% of the patients. Thus, the subset analysis may not be powered sufficiently to detect a difference and the generalizability of these results to this subset may be limited.
www.OncologyEducation.ca
BOTTOM LINE FOR CANADIAN MEDICAL ONCOLOGISTS
•Sunitinib produces a progression free survival benefit compared to IFN alpha in patients with mRCC treated first-line. PFS was the primary endpoint and this is a positive study.
•There is a borderline overall survival benefit but this endpoint is clouded by second-line treatment of IFN patients with targeted agents. This may dilute the true OS benefit
•Sunitinib remains a standard of care for the first-line treatment of mRCC in Canada
•As of June 2008 in Canada:
•Some provincial cancer programs cover the cost of sunitinib
•Several private Canadian insurance plans include sunitinib
www.OncologyEducation.ca
Treatment of mRCC:Current Status
Setting Patients Therapy
(level 1 evidence)
Other Alternatives
Untreated Good or intermediate risk
Sunitinib
Bevacizumab* + IFN
HD IL-2
Sorafenib
Clinical Trial
Observation
Poor risk Temsirolimus Sunitinib
Clinical Trial
Second-line Cytokine refractory Sorafenib Sunitinib, Bevacizumab* + IFN
Prior VEGF (or mTOR)
Everolimus*
Clinical Trial
Targeted therapy not previously used
*Bevacizumab and Everolimus are not yet FDA or Health Canada Approved for RCC
Adapted with permission from Dr. Brian Rini