reynolds stress constrained multiscale large eddy simulation for wall-bounded turbulence shiyi chen...
DESCRIPTION
Question: How can one directly use fundamental physics learnt from our research on turbulence for modeling and simulation? Conservation of energy, helicity, constant energy flux in the inertia range, scalar flux, intermittency exponents, Reynolds stress structures… Through constrained variation principle.. such as decimation theory, renormalized perturbation theory… physical space?TRANSCRIPT
Reynolds Stress Constrained Multiscale Large Eddy Simulation for
Wall-Bounded Turbulence
Shiyi Chen Yipeng Shi,Zuoli Xiao,Suyang Pei, Jianchun Wang, Yantao
Yang State Key Laboratory of Turbulence and Complex Systems College
of Engineering, Peking University and Johns Hopkins University
Question: How can one directly use
fundamental physics learnt from our research on turbulence for
modeling and simulation? Conservation of energy, helicity, constant
energy flux in the inertia range, scalar flux, intermittency
exponents, Reynolds stress structures Through constrained variation
principle.. such as decimation theory, renormalized perturbation
theory physical space? Comparison of PDF of SGS dissipation at grid
scale (a posteriori)
Test of the Constrained-SGS Model Forced isotropic turbulence: DNS:
Direct Numerical Simulation. A statistically steady isotropic
turbulence (Re=250) data obtained by Pseudo-spectral method with
5123 resolution. DSM: Dynamic Smagorinsky Model DMM: Dynamic Mixed
Similarity Model CDMM: Constrained Dynamic Mixed Model Comparison
of the steady state energy spectra. Comparison of PDF of SGS
dissipation at grid scale (a posteriori) Large Eddy Simulation
resolution challenge at high Re
Near-wall treatment is key to utility of LES in practice 106 108.5
(Piomelli2002) Hybrid RANS/LES Detached Eddy Simulation
S-A Model DES-Mean Velocity Profile DES Buffer Layer and Transition
Problem
Lack of small scale fluctuations in the RANS area is the main
shortcoming of hybrid RANS/LES method Possible Solution to the
Transition Problem
Hamba (2002, 2006): Overlap method Keating et al. (2004, 2006):
synthetic turbulence in the interface Reynolds Stress Constrained
Large Eddy Simulation (RSC-LES)
Solve LES equations in both inner and outer layers, the inner layer
flow will have sufficient small scale fluctuations and generate a
correct Reynolds Stress at the interface; Impose the Reynolds
stress constraint on the inner layer LES equations such that the
inner layer flow has a consistent (or good) mean velocity profile;
(constrained variation) Coarse-Grid everywhere LES Small scare
turbulence in the whole space Reynolds Stress Constrained Control
of the mean velocity profile in LES by imposing the Reynolds Stress
Constraint
LES equations Performance of ensemble average of the LES equations
leads to where K-epsilon model to solve
Reynolds stress constrained SGS stress modelis adoptedfor the LES
of inner layer flow: Decompose the SGS model into two parts: The
mean value is solved from the Reynolds stress constraint: K-epsilon
model to solve Algebra eddy viscosity: Balaras & Benocci (1994)
and Balaras et al. (1996) where (3) S-A model (best model so far
for separation) The interface to separate the inner and outer
layer
For thefluctuationof SGS stress,a Smagorinsky type model is
adopted: The interface to separate the inner and outer layer is
located at the beginning point of log-law region, such the Reynolds
stress achieves its maximum. Results of RSC-LES Mean velocity
profiles of RSC-LES of turbulent channel flow at different ReT =180
~ 590 Mean velocity profiles of RSC-LES, non-constrained LES using
dynamic Smagorinsky model and DES (ReT=590) Mean velocity profiles
of RSC-LES, non-constrained LES using dynamic Smagorinsky model and
DES (ReT=1000) Mean velocity profiles of RSC-LES, non-constrained
LES using dynamic Smagorinsky model and DES (ReT=1500) Mean
velocity profiles of RSC-LES, non-constrained LES using dynamic
Smagorinsky model and DES (ReT=2000) Error in prediction of the
skin friction coefficient:
(friction law, Dean) % Error ReT=590 ReT=1000 ReT=1500 ReT=2000
LES-RSC 1.6 2.5 3.3 0.3 LES-DSM 15.5 21.3 30.2 35.9 DES 19.7 17.0
13.5 14.1 Interface of RSC-LES and DES (ReT=2000) Velocity
fluctuations (r. m. s) of RSC-LES and DNS (ReT=180,395,590)
Velocity fluctuations (r.m.s) of RSC-LES and DNS (ReT=180,395,590).
Small flunctuations generated at the near-wall region, which is
different from the DES method. RSC-LES DNS(Moser) Velocity
fluctuations (r.m.s) and resolved shear stress:(ReT=2000) DES
streamwise fluctuations in plane parallel to the
wall at different positions:(ReT=2000) y+=6 y+=38 y+=200 y+=1000
y+=1500 y+=500 DSM-LES streamwise fluctuations in plane parallel
to
the wall at different positions:(ReT=2000) y+=6 y+=38 y+=200
y+=1000 y+=1500 y+=500 RSC-LES streamwise fluctuations in plane
parallel to
the wall at different positions:(ReT=2000) y+=6 y+=38 y+=200
y+=1500 y+=500 y+=1000 Multiscale Simulation of Fluid Turbulence
Conclusions RSC-LES uses the same grids resolution as DES;
2. The inner layer flow solved by RSC-LES possesses sufficient
small scale fluctuations; 3. The transition of the mean velocity
profile obtained by the RSC-LES from the inner layer to the outer
layer at the interface is smooth; 4. RSC-LES is a simple method and
may improve DES, and the forcing scheme 5. We have used time
averaging scheme for non-uniform systems, RSC-LES works nicely.