rf fundamentals beam loading 2008 - 04 - rf... · 2019. 7. 17. · rf fundamentals beam loading...
TRANSCRIPT
RF FUNDAMENTALSBEAM LOADING
Jean Delayen
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityOld Dominion University
Joint Accelerator School Indore January 2008
Equivalent Circuit for an rf CavitySimple LC circuit representing an accelerating resonator
Metamorphosis of the LC circuit into an accelerating cavity
Chain of weakly coupled pillbox cavities representing an accelerating cavity
Chain of coupled pendula as its mechanical analogue
Parallel Circuit Model of an Electromagnetic Mode
• Power dissipated in resistor R:
• Shunt impedance:
• Quality factor of resonator:
212
cdiss
VPR
=
2c
shdiss
VRP
≡ 2shR Rfi =
1/ 20
0 0diss c
U R CQ CR RP L L
Ê ˆ∫ = = = Á ˜Ë ¯ω ω
ω
1
00
0
1Z R iQ-
È ˘Ê ˆ= + -Í ˙Á ˜Ë ¯Î ˚
ωωω ω
1
00 0
0
1 2Z R iQ-
È ˘Ê ˆ-ª ª +Í ˙Á ˜Ë ¯Î ˚
ω ωω ωω
,
1-Port System
2 2 00 0
01 2
1 2
gg
c
c
kV RI V kVR Qk Z R k Z iQi
= = + + + ∆ω ω + ∆ω
ω
20
01 2Total impedance:
c
Rk Z Qi ωω
∆+
+
1-Port System
( )
( )
2 20
22 20
222 4 2 20 0 0
2
0
20 0
02 22
0
1 12 212
4
8
4 11 21
1
Energy content
Incident power:
Define coupling coefficient:
g
C
ginc
inc C
C
QU CV VR
Q Rk VR
R k Z k Z Q
VP
ZR
k ZQU
P Q
ω
ω ωω
β
βω β ω
β ω
∆
∆
= =
=Ê ˆ
+ + Á ˜Ë ¯
=
=
=+ Ê ˆÊ ˆ+ Á ˜ Á ˜Ë ¯+ Ë ¯
1-Port System
( )
( )
2 220 0
2
4 11 21
1
0, 1 :
4 111 21
Power dissipated
Optimal coupling: maximum or
critical coupling
Reflected power
diss inc
C
diss incinc
ref inc diss mc
UP PQ Q
U P PP
P P P P
ω ββ ω
β ω
ω β
ββ
∆
∆
= =+ Ê ˆÊ ˆ+ Á ˜ Á ˜Ë ¯+ Ë ¯
=
fi = =
= - = -+
+2
01 C
Q ωβ ω
∆
È ˘Í ˙Í ˙Í ˙Ê ˆÍ ˙
Á ˜Í ˙+Ë ¯Î ˚
1-Port System
( )
( )
02
2
2
4141
11
At resonance
incC
diss inc
ref inc
QU P
P P
P P
βω β
ββ
ββ
=+
=+
Ê - ˆ= Á ˜Ë ¯+
Dissipated and Reflected Power
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
β
Equivalent Circuit for a Cavity with Beam
• Beam in the rf cavity is represented by a current generator. • Equivalent circuit:
(1 )sh
LRR
β=
+
0
0-21
produces with phase (detuning angle) produces with phase
tan
b b
g g
c g b
i Vi V
V V V
Q
ψψ
ωψβ ω
∆
= -
=+
Equivalent Circuit for a Cavity with Beam
1/ 21/ 2
0
0
2( ) cos1
cos2(1 )
sin22
2: beam rf current: beam dc current: beam bunch length
g g sh
b shb
b
bb
b
b
V P R
i RV
i i
ii
β ψβ
ψβθ
θ
θ
=+
=+
=
Equivalent Circuit for a Cavity with Beam
( ) [ ]{ }2
2 211 (1 ) tan tan
4c
gsh
VP b b
Rβ β ψ φ
β= + + + + -
0 02cos cosPower absorbed by the beam =
Power dissipated in the cavityc sh
cc
sh
V i R ibVV
R
φ φ= =
2
(1 ) tan tan
1
1 (1 )2
opt opt
opt
opt cg
sh
b
b
b bVPR
β ψ φ
β
+ =
= +
+ + +=
Minimize Pg :
Cavity with Beam and Microphonics
• The detuning is now 0 0
0 0
0
0tan 2 tan 2
where is the static detuning (controllable)
and is the random dynamic detuning (uncontrollable)
mL L
m
Q Qδω δω δω
ψ ψω ω
δωδω
±= - = -
-10-8-6-4-202468
10
90 95 100 105 110 115 120
Time (sec)
Freq
uenc
y (H
z)
Probability DensityMedium β CM Prototype, Cavity #2, CW @ 6MV/m
400000 samples
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8
Peak Frequency Deviation (V)
Prob
abili
ty D
ensi
ty
Qext Optimization with Microphonics2
20
0
222
00
( 1) 2
( 1) ( 1) 22
mopt
opt c mg
sh
b Q
VP b b QR
δωβω
δωω
Ê ˆ= + + Á ˜Ë ¯
È ˘Ê ˆÍ ˙= + + + + Á ˜Í ˙Ë ¯Î ˚
• Condition for optimum coupling:
and
• In the absence of beam (b=0):
and
2
00
22
00
1 2
1 1 22
If is very large
mopt
opt c mg
sh
m m
Q
VP QR
U
δωβω
δωω
δω δω
Ê ˆ= + Á ˜Ë ¯
È ˘Ê ˆÍ ˙= + + Á ˜Í ˙Ë ¯Î ˚
Example7-cell, 1500 MHz
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1 10 100
Qext (106)
P (k
W)
21.0 MV/m, 460 uA, 50 Hz 0 deg
21.0 MV/m, 460 uA, 38 Hz 0 deg
21.0 MV/m, 460 uA, 25 Hz 0 deg
21.0 MV/m, 460 uA, 13 Hz 0 deg
21.0 MV/m, 460 uA, 0 Hz 0 deg
Example3-spoke, 345 MHz, β=0.62
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
1.0 10.0 100.0
Qext (10^6)
P (k
W)
10.5 MV/m, 400 uA, 10 Hz 20 deg
10.5 MV/m, 300 uA, 10 Hz 20 deg
10.5 MV/m, 200 uA, 10 Hz 20 deg
10.5 MV/m, 100 uA, 10 Hz 20 deg
10.5 MV/m, 0 uA, 10 Hz 20 deg
Example
• ERL Injector and Linac: δfm=25 Hz, Q0=1x1010 , f0=1300 MHz, I0=100 mA, Vc=20 MV/m, L=1.04 m, Ra/Q0=1036 ohms per cavity
• ERL linac: Resultant beam current, Itot = 0 mA (energy recovery)and βopt=385 ⇒ QL=2.6x107 ⇒ Pg = 4 kW per cavity.
• ERL Injector: I0=100 mA and βopt= 5x104 ! ⇒ QL= 2x105 ⇒ Pg = 2.08 MW per cavity!
Note: I0Va = 2.08 MW ⇒ optimization is entirely dominated by beam loading.
RF System Modeling
• To include amplitude and phase feedback, nonlinear effects from the klystron and be able to analyze transient response of the system, response to large parameter variations or beam current fluctuations
– We developed a model of the cavity and low level controls using SIMULINK, a MATLAB-based program for simulating dynamic systems.
• Model describes the beam-cavity interaction, includes a realistic representation of low level controls, klystron characteristics, microphonic noise, Lorentz force detuning and coupling and excitation of mechanical resonances
RF System Model