richard willing national desk usa today national conference on science, technology and the law st....
DESCRIPTION
Richard Willing National Desk USA TODAY National Conference on Science, Technology and the Law St. Petersburg, Fla. Sept 12, 2005. DNA. Not Just For Hunters Anymore. DNA=DNR. 1991. `. 1999. Benjamin La Guer. CSI. `. The CSI Effect— EGs. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
• Richard Willing
• National Desk• USA TODAY
• National Conference on Science,
• Technology and the Law• St. Petersburg, Fla.• Sept 12, 2005
0102030405060708090
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
EastWestNorth
DNA
Not Just For Hunters Anymore
DNA=DNR
1991
`
1999
Benjamin La Guer
CSI
`
The CSI Effect—EGs
• Texas 2003- The Case of the Missing Noggin
• Arizona, California and Illinois—”Negative Evidence Witnesses”
• Massachusetts- Voir Dire Via Nielsen Rating
• Delaware 2003- The DNA Jury Project
Questions For Reporters
• What’s a Match?• How Was Probability Computed?• For Defense: Discovery? And what it shows-
unreported contributors, allelic dropout, poor mixture separation.
• On Appeal: What’s law on post-conviction testing? What was theory of crime? And theory of defense? How would post-conviction testing fit it?
• Page 3AFeb 8, 2000
• DNA mismatch found- A British database made a ‘mindblowing’mistake by linking an innocentman to a burglary. The resultcould be a spate of new appeals.
What’s A Mismatch
• UNITED KINGDOM• FSS• Burglary• Autumn 1999• 12 allele, six locus match• 660,000 offender samples searched• Random match probability= 1/37million
What’s “Exoneration?”
• Legal versus• Factual versus• Metaphysical• Innocence!!!
Kerry Max Cook
What I learned on “CSI”
• Hotel Bed Sheets Are Nasty• Visit A Dentist At Least Once• Don’t Make Your Girl Friend Angry
Where To From Here
• You tell me….
One Happy Guy
DNA RESOURCES
• BOOKS:• “Abraham Lincoln’s DNA and Other Adventures in Genetics.” Philip
R. Reilly, 2002.• ARTICLES: • “DNA: If the test is irrefutable, why doesn’t it always work?” Peter
Boyer. The New Yorker. 1/17/2000.• “DNA testing fails to live up to potential.” Richard Willing. USA
TODAY. 10/7/02.• “Think DNA evidence is foolproof? Try again.” Adam Liptak. NY
Times. 3/16/03.• “Evaluating forensic DNA evidence.” Thompson, Ford, Doom,
Raymer and Krane. The Champion. April 2003. May 2003
• SITES:• Dnaresource.com. -- weekly news summary• Fbi.gov/hq/lab/codis/index1.htm. -- govt database figures• Innocenceproject.org-- see esp “DNA news” by Judge Peter
McQuillan
• REPORTS: • National DNA Forensic Study Report. Ojp.usdoj.gov/nij.
2004. crime lab backlog survey• What Every Law Enforcement Officer Should Know About
DNA Evidence. National Institute of Justice. 2000• The Future of Forensic DNA Testing. National Institute of
Justice. 2004.