risk, creativity & ethics: dimensions of innovation in qualitative social science research...
DESCRIPTION
Risk, Creativity & Ethics: Dimensions of innovation in qualitative social science research methods. Melanie Nind, Rose Wiles, Andrew Bengry-Howell, Graham Crow University of Southampton. Structure. The nature of methodological innovation Three case studies Methods Findings Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council1
Risk, Creativity & Ethics: Dimensions of
innovation in qualitative social science research
methodsMelanie Nind, Rose Wiles, Andrew Bengry-Howell, Graham Crow
University of Southampton
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
Structure1. The nature of methodological innovation2. Three case studies3. Methods4. Findings5. Conclusions
2
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
Context
NCRM’s overall mission is to provide a strategic focal point for the identification, development and delivery of an integrated national research and training programme aimed at promoting a step change in the quality and range of methodological skills and techniques used by the UK social science community and providing support for, and dissemination of, methodological innovation and excellence within the UK.
3
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
Defining features• Should be rooted in genuine attempt to improve some
aspect of the research process (not just gimmickry or innovation for innovation sake)
• Driven by complex social relations• Can comprise developments to established methods as
well as new methods• Should (arguably) be some level of dissemination,
acceptance and take-up in the social science community (but process slow)
(Travers, 2009; Coffey and Taylor, 2008; Xenitidou and Gilbert, 2012)
4
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
Drivers of innovation• Value placed on innovation by research councils,
funders, journal editors & reviewers, REF etc• Emergence of complex new social situations,
developments in disciplines, and resulting research questions
• Affordances of new technologies• Filling methods gaps and respodonding to ethical
concerns
5
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
The CasesOnline/Virtual ethnography … Netnography
Robert Kozinets
Child-led research … Children as Researchers Mary Kellett
Creative methods … Lego Serious Play David Gauntlett
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
Methods
7
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
Thematic analysis1. Timeliness – why this, why now2. Distinctiveness3. Contribution to the substantive area, discipline or
methods4. Process of breakthrough, acceptance and uptake5. Potential future
8
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
Findings• Innovators motivated by perceived needs,
shortcomings & ethical concerns• Process involves publication, publicity,
championing, fit with the time and mood• Innovators take & manage risks• There are dangers as well as virtues• Reflexivity is essential
9
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
Conclusions• Importance of the long view• Need for us to innovate with caution and in
response to genuine social or methodological need or opportunity
• Need for reflexivity• But where is innovation in educational
research?
10
NCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research CouncilNCRM is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council
For more detail see• Nind, M., Wiles, R.A., Bengry-Howell, A. & Grow, G.P. (2012)
Methodological Innovation and Research Ethics: Forces in tension or forces in harmony? Qualitative Research i1-12.
• Wiles, R.A., Bengry-Howell, A., Nind, M. & Crow, G. (in press) But is it innovation? The development of novel methodological approaches in qualitative research, Methodological Innovation Online.
11