risk management chap 10 market risk

26
Market Risk Market Risk Chapter 10 © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Upload: sasyaquiqe

Post on 08-Apr-2015

588 views

Category:

Documents


11 download

DESCRIPTION

bahan ujian berkala manajemen resiko IBS

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

Market RiskMarket Risk

Chapter 10

© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Page 2: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-2

Overview

This chapter discusses the nature of market risk and appropriate measures Dollar exposure RiskMetrics Historic or back simulation Monte Carlo simulation Links between market risk and capital

requirements

Page 3: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-3

Trading Risks

Trading exposes banks to risks 1995 Barings Bank 1996 Sumitomo Corp. lost $2.6 billion in

commodity futures trading AllFirst/ Allied Irish $691 million loss

Allfirst eventually sold to Buffalo based M&T Bank due to dissatisfaction among stockholders of Allied Irish

Page 4: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-4

Implications

Emphasizes importance of:

Measurement of exposure Control mechanisms for direct market risk—and

employee created risks Hedging mechanisms

Of interest to regulators

Page 5: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-5

Market Risk

Market risk is the uncertainty resulting from changes in market prices .

Affected by other risks such as interest rate risk and FX risk

It can be measured over periods as short as one day.

Usually measured in terms of dollar exposure amount or as a relative amount against some benchmark.

Page 6: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-6

Market Risk Measurement

Important in terms of: Management information Setting limits Resource allocation (risk/return tradeoff) Performance evaluation Regulation

BIS and Fed regulate market risk via capital requirements leading to potential for overpricing of risks

Allowances for use of internal models to calculate capital requirements

Page 7: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-7

Calculating Market Risk Exposure

Generally concerned with estimated potential loss under adverse circumstances.

Three major approaches of measurement JPM RiskMetrics (or variance/covariance

approach) Historic or Back Simulation Monte Carlo Simulation

Page 8: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-8

JP Morgan RiskMetrics Model

Idea is to determine the daily earnings at risk = dollar value of position × price sensitivity × potential adverse move in yield or,

DEAR = Dollar market value of position × Price volatility.

Can be stated as (MD) × (potential adverse daily yield move) where,

MD = D/(1+R)

Modified duration = MacAulay duration/(1+R)

Page 9: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-9

Confidence Intervals

If we assume that changes in the yield are normally distributed, we can construct confidence intervals around the projected DEAR. (Other distributions can be accommodated but normal is generally sufficient).

Assuming normality, 90% of the time the disturbance will be within 1.65 standard deviations of the mean.

(5% of the extreme values greater than +1.65 standard deviations and 5% of the extreme values less than -1.65 standard deviations)

Page 10: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-10

Adverse 7-Year Rate Move

Page 11: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-11

Confidence Intervals: Example

Suppose that we are long in 7-year zero-coupon bonds and we define “bad” yield changes such that there is only 5% chance of the yield change being exceeded in either direction. Assuming normality, 90% of the time yield changes will be within 1.65 standard deviations of the mean. If the standard deviation is 10 basis points, this corresponds to 16.5 basis points. Concern is that yields will rise. Probability of yield increases greater than 16.5 basis points is 5%.

Page 12: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-12

Confidence Intervals: Example

Price volatility = (MD) (Potential adverse change in yield)

= (6.527) (0.00165) = 1.077%

DEAR = Market value of position (Price volatility)

= ($1,000,000) (.01077) = $10,770

Page 13: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-13

Confidence Intervals: Example

To calculate the potential loss for more than one day:

Market value at risk (VARN) = DEAR × Example:

For a five-day period,

VAR5 = $10,770 ×

= $24,082

N

N

5

Page 14: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-14

Foreign Exchange

In the case of Foreign Exchange, DEAR is computed in the same fashion we employed for interest rate risk.

DEAR = dollar value of position × FX rate volatility volatility where the FX rate volatility is taken as 1.65 FX

Page 15: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-15

Equities

For equities,

Total risk

= Systematic risk + Unsystematic risk

If the portfolio is well diversified then

DEAR = dollar value of position × stock market return volatility where the market return volatility is taken as 1.65 M.

Page 16: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-16

Aggregating DEAR Estimates

Cannot simply sum up individual DEARs. In order to aggregate the DEARs from

individual exposures we require the correlation matrix.

Three-asset case:

DEAR portfolio = [DEARa2 + DEARb

2 + DEARc2

+ 2ab × DEARa × DEARb + 2ac × DEARa × DEARc + 2bc × DEARb × DEARc]1/2

Page 17: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-17

Historic or Back Simulation

Advantages: Simplicity Does not require normal distribution of

returns (which is a critical assumption for RiskMetrics)

Does not need correlations or standard deviations of individual asset returns.

Page 18: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-18

Historic or Back Simulation

Basic idea: Revalue portfolio based on actual prices (returns) on the assets that existed yesterday, the day before, etc. (usually previous 500 days).

Then calculate 5% worst-case (25th lowest value of 500 days) outcomes.

Only 5% of the outcomes were lower.

Page 19: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-19

Estimation of VAR: Example

Convert today’s FX positions into dollar equivalents at today’s FX rates.

Measure sensitivity of each position Calculate its delta.

Measure risk Actual percentage changes in FX rates for each

of past 500 days. Rank days by risk from worst to best.

Page 20: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-20

Weaknesses

Disadvantage: 500 observations is not very many from statistical standpoint.

Increasing number of observations by going back further in time is not desirable.

Could weight recent observations more heavily and go further back.

Page 21: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-21

Monte Carlo Simulation

To overcome problem of limited number of observations, synthesize additional observations. Perhaps 10,000 real and synthetic

observations. Employ historic covariance matrix and

random number generator to synthesize observations. Objective is to replicate the distribution of

observed outcomes with synthetic data.

Page 22: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-22

Regulatory Models

BIS (including Federal Reserve) approach: Market risk may be calculated using standard

BIS model. Specific risk charge. General market risk charge. Offsets.

Subject to regulatory permission, large banks may be allowed to use their internal models as the basis for determining capital requirements.

Page 23: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-23

BIS Model

Specific risk charge: Risk weights × absolute dollar values of long and

short positions General market risk charge:

reflect modified durations expected interest rate shocks for each maturity

Vertical offsets: Adjust for basis risk

Horizontal offsets within/between time zones

Page 24: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-24

Web Resources

For information on the BIS framework, visit:

Bank for International Settlement www.bis.org

Federal Reserve Bank www.federalreserve.gov

Page 25: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-25

In calculating DEAR, adverse change in rates defined as 99th percentile (rather than 95th under RiskMetrics)

Minimum holding period is 10 days (means that RiskMetrics’ daily DEAR multiplied by )*.

Capital charge will be higher of: Previous day’s VAR (or DEAR ) Average Daily VAR over previous 60 days times a

multiplication factor 3.

*Proposal to change to minimum period of 5 days under Basel II, end of 2006.

Large Banks: BIS versus RiskMetrics

10

10

Page 26: Risk Management Chap 10 Market Risk

10-26

Pertinent Websites

American Banker www.americanbanker.com

Bank of America www.bankofamerica.com

Bank for International Settlements www.bis.org

Federal Reserve www.federalreserve.gov

J.P.Morgan/Chase www.jpmorganchase.com

RiskMetrics www.riskmetrics.com