ro promo review q1 12 vs 11

45
Q1 2012 vs 2011 Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Upload: hipercom

Post on 27-Nov-2014

1.910 views

Category:

Business


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Global overview of Food Retail Prommotional Insights trend, for romanian food market. First Quarter 2012 versus 2011

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 2: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

RETAILERS SUMMARY

QUANTITATIV KPI Slides

1- LEAFLETS & PROMO OPERATIONS1- LEAFLETS & PROMO OPERATIONS 4-114-11

32-4432-44

4- PROMO MECHANISMS4- PROMO MECHANISMS 21-2721-27

3- PROMO PRESSURE & SHARE OF VOICE3- PROMO PRESSURE & SHARE OF VOICE

17-2017-20

2- TRADE STRATEGY2- TRADE STRATEGY 12-1612-16

QUALITY KPI 28-3128-31

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 3: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

VOCABULARYVOCABULARY

Q1 2012 vs 2011

•Promo Pressure: index of promo visibility for a retailer, a category a brand or a format

•Share of Voice: index of promo visibility for a retailer, a category a brand or a format in relative value versus competitors. The Share of Voice index of Hipercom shows the promo activity of the Retailers in the most exhaustive way, taking into consideration the quantity of promotional operations, SKU’s or WU in Promo, the commercial space (in m2) when the promotion was valid and the number of days of the validity days of that specific promotion.

•Weighted Unit ( WU): One or more SKU from the same family, being on the same promotion (many flavors for juice, many colors for shampoo, many sizes for textile)

•Consumer advantages: All additional trade mechanisms supporting the promo price and mentioned on the promo leaflet.•Promo price: Price on the leaflet (should be different from the shelf price) •Virtual Price: Promo price – (minus) all consumers advantages •ND: National distribution For one retailer = number of stores participating in a promotion/ Total number of that retailer’s stores. •Negative Promo: (Index)= Qty of promo cheaper somewhere else ( at the same date) / total qty of promo (for the concerned retailer)

•Perimeter of analysis: Romania: CC, Hyper, Super, HDD (Analysis for the Top 20 Retailers of this category)

Page 4: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

1- LEAFLETS & PROMO OPERATIONS

1- LEAFLETS & PROMO OPERATIONS

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 5: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

LEAFLETS & PRMO OPERATIONLEAFLETS & PRMO OPERATION

Q1 2012 vs 2011

NATIONALS PO

REGIONAL PO

Q1 2012 Evolution

233 259

88 37

- 10 % -17%

+138 % +119%

Q1 2011 PressurePromo Op*

*A Promo Operation is a set of leaflets issued by a store network. This set could consist of one leaflet till 25 or more regional variations

We see that the retailers prefer to investIn regional PO in 2012

Page 6: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

LEAFLETS & PRMO OPERATIONLEAFLETS & PRMO OPERATION

NATIONALS OP

REGIONAL OP

Pressure

18

12

17

16

( Nationals PO) Q1 2012(evol) HM SM ( Nationals PO) Q1 2012(evol)

+3

-2

+3

+1

+115

8

1

8

-3

233 259

88 37

- 10 % -17%

+138 % +119%

-12

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Q1 2012 Evolution Q1 2011Promo Op*

*A Promo Operation is a set of leaflets issued by a store network. This set could consist of one leaflet till 25 or more regional variations

Page 7: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

LEAFLETS & PRMO OPERATIONLEAFLETS & PRMO OPERATION

NATIONALS PO

REGIONAL PO

C&C HD

-1

27

51

13

13+5

-26

233 259

88 37

- 10 % -17%

+138 % +119%

( Nationals PO) Q1 2012(evol) ( Nationals PO) Q1 2012(evol) +14

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Q1 2012 Evolution Q1 2011Promo Op*

*A Promo Operation is a set of leaflets issued by a store network. This set could consist of one leaflet till 25 or more regional variations

Pressure

Page 8: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

5 TOP TRAFFIC LEAFLET (by PO Share of Voice) 5 TOP TRAFFIC LEAFLET (by PO Share of Voice)

Number of WU 290 268 399 384 357Stores 74 74 25 24 25Days 7 7 7 7 6

PO Promo Pressure

( vs others)

100% 89% 54% 49%49%

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 9: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

AVERAGE NUMBER OF PAGES/PROMO OPAVERAGE NUMBER OF PAGES/PROMO OP

28 pag

25 pag

25 pag

23 pag

20 pag

18 pag

17 pag

15 pag

14 pag

10 pag

10 pag

9 pag

-4 pag

-5 pag

-1 pag

+2 pag

-1 pag

+2 pag

-4 pag

+2 pag

-1 pag

+3 pag

Q1 2012 vs 2011

The number of pages per PO is decreasing or increasing. Only 2 are constant. We can see the mostSignificant cost cutting in METRO, REAL & CORA.The 2012 leaflet is lighter than in 2011.

Page 10: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

NUMBER OF PROMO OPERATIONSNUMBER OF PROMO OPERATIONS

+5 po

+5 po

+21 po

+13 po

+9 po

+3 po

+2 po

-2 po

-6 po

-4 po

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Even if in 2012 the leaflet is lighter, the retailers increased their quantity of leaflet edition.

Page 11: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

2 - TRADE STRATEGY2 - TRADE STRATEGY

Page 12: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

WU TYPOLOGY (Brands, Private Labels, Unbranded )WU TYPOLOGY (Brands, Private Labels, Unbranded )

64,5% (-0.9 pts)

14,8% (+3.2 pts)

20, 7% (-2,3 pts)

Within HIPERMARKET,SUPERMAKET,HARD DISCOUNT,CASH&CARRY

Q1 2012 vs 2011

We can observe that the Unbranded are loosing share in favor of Private Labels. This shows that the strategy of the retailers is to reduce the space for the promotions without budget.

* WU = one ore more SKU from the same family, visible on one picture (e.g. various flavors)

Page 13: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

177ref -25 59,7%(-3,7 pts)

142 ref -80 56,2%(2,5 pts)

204 ref 2 53,3%(2,4 pts)

245 ref 29 60,6%(4,7 pts)

80 ref -53 70,8%(-0,3 pt)

125 ref 68 84,3%(3,5 pts)

131 ref 15 72,4%(-7,4 pts)

48 ref -8 70,4%(-6,5 pts)

97 ref 4,8%(4,8 pts)

143 ref 23 65,6%(3,9 pts)

162 ref -24 60,5%(-0,8 pt)

119 ref -16 82,8%(-0,6 pt)

WU TYPOLOGY (National Brands)WU TYPOLOGY (National Brands)NumberWU/OP

Evolution Q1 2012

vs 2011

National Brands

Q1 2012 vs 2011

* WU = one ore more SKU from the same family, visible on one picture (e.g. various flavors)

Page 14: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

177ref -25 59,7%(-3,7 pts) 16,1%(5,2 pts)

142 ref -80 56,2%(2,5 pts) 12,4%(2,1 pts)

204 ref 2 53,3%(2,4 pts) 15,3%(-1 pt)

245 ref 29 60,6%(4,7 pts) 10,7%(-0,6 pt)

80 ref -53 70,8%(-0,3 pt) 9,0%(-1,2 pt)

125 ref 68 84,3%(3,5 pts) 14,3%(2,4 pts)

131 ref 15 72,4%(-7,4 pts) 11,2%(4,2 pts)

48 ref -8 70,4%(-6,5 pts) 15,4%(9,3 pts)

97 ref 4,8%(4,8 pts) 85,0%(85 pts)

143 ref 23 65,6%(3,9 pts) 15,1%(-1,2 pt)

162 ref -24 60,5%(-0,8 pt) 22,8%(4,5 pts)

119 ref -16 82,8%(-0,6 pt) 3,4%(0,6 pt)

WU TYPOLOGY (Private Label)WU TYPOLOGY (Private Label)NumberWU/OP

National Brands Private LabelEvolution

Q1 2012 vs

2011

Q1 2012 vs 2011

* WU = one ore more SKU from the same family, visible on one picture (e.g. various flavors)

Page 15: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

WU TYPOLOGY (Unbranded)WU TYPOLOGY (Unbranded)NumberWU/OP

National Brands Private Label Unbranded

177ref -25 59,7%(-3,7 pts) 16,1%(5,2 pts) 24,2%(-1,5 pt)

142 ref -80 56,2%(2,5 pts) 12,4%(2,1 pts) 31,4%(-4,5 pts)

204 ref 2 53,3%(2,4 pts) 15,3%(-1 pt) 31,4%(-1,4 pt)

245 ref 29 60,6%(4,7 pts) 10,7%(-0,6 pt) 28,7%(-4,2 pts)

80 ref -53 70,8%(-0,3 pt) 9,0%(-1,2 pt) 20,2%(1,5 pt)

125 ref 68 84,3%(3,5 pts) 14,3%(2,4 pts) 1,4%(-5,9 pts)

131 ref 15 72,4%(-7,4 pts) 11,2%(4,2 pts) 16,4%(3,1 pts)

48 ref -8 70,4%(-6,5 pts) 15,4%(9,3 pts) 14,2%(-2,8 pts)

97 ref 4,8%(4,8 pts) 85,0%(85 pts) 10,2%(10,2 pts)

143 ref 23 65,6%(3,9 pts) 15,1%(-1,2 pt) 19,2%(-2,6 pts)

162 ref -24 60,5%(-0,8 pt) 22,8%(4,5 pts) 16,7%(-3,7 pts)

119 ref -16 82,8%(-0,6 pt) 3,4%(0,6 pt) 13,8%(-0,1 pt)

Evolution Q1 2012

vs 2011

Q1 2012 vs 2011

* WU = one ore more SKU from the same family, visible on one picture (e.g. various flavors)

Page 16: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

AVERAGE VIRTUAL PRICE (all leaflets) AVERAGE VIRTUAL PRICE (all leaflets)

Q1 2012 vs 2011

The Retailers that reduced their prices with an average of 20% in order to align with the market are Carrefour, Metro & Selgros.

Page 17: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

3 – PROMO PRESSURE & SHARE OF VOICE

3 – PROMO PRESSURE & SHARE OF VOICE

Page 18: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO PRESSURE GROWTH* (WU)PROMO PRESSURE GROWTH* (WU)

PROMO PRESSURE

FOOD

NON - FOOD

+2,7%+2,7%

-4,4%-4,4%

HIPERMARKET

SUPERMARKET

CASH&CARRY

HARD DISCOUNT

+13,5%+13,5%

-8,1%-8,1%

-9,0%-9,0%

-3,6%-3,6%

Q1 2012 vs 2011

The Promo Pressure has a positive trend in the Q1 v/s Y-1. We have seen previously that the number of Promo Operation was growing. Taking a look at how retailers behaved in the 1st quarter of 212, we see that only Hypermarkets have a positive trend respect the other formats and apparently Hypermarkets are strong enough to change the trend of the market.

*The Promo Pressure growth is calculated in WU . A growth < 0 means a mix of less WU promoted

Growth v/s Y-1

+ 5,2%

Page 19: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO PRESSURE GROWTH* (WU)PROMO PRESSURE GROWTH* (WU)

Q1 2012 vs 2011

The detailed promo pressure growth by player shows the correlation between number of pages downsize and promo pressure reduction.

*The Promo Pressure growth is calculated in WU . A growth < 0 means a mix of less WU promoted

Page 20: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

SHARE OF VOICE (WU)SHARE OF VOICE (WU)

*where Others represents the retailers outside selection with the same chain format as selected.

Others*

-2 pts

9,4%

-1 pt

+2 pts

+2 pts

+2 pts

+1 pt

-1 pt

-6 pts

Q1 2012 vs 2011

100%=Total FOOD Retailers Q1 2012

The 2 most important players remain Selgros & Metro.Look how Carrefour – Cora & Real are fighting for the 3rd rank on the podium!

Page 21: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

4 – PROMO MECHANISMS4 – PROMO MECHANISMS

Page 22: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO MECHANISMS(WU)PROMO MECHANISMS(WU)Products with consumer benefits by retailer format

HIPERMARKET SUPERMARKET CASH&CARRY HARD DISCOUNT

Regarding the consumer benefits an important increasing was in SUPERMARKETS with 7 pts while HARD DISCOUNT registered a negative evolution -7.8 pts versus 2011.

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Q1 2011Q1 2012

Page 23: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO MECHANISMS(WU)PROMO MECHANISMS(WU)Products with consumer benefits per retailer

HIPERMARKET SUPERMARKET

Analyzing the consumer benefits by retailer, we have a clear picture of the evolution of these. In Hipermarkets only Kaufland has a positive evolution respect the others, while in Supermarkets Mega Image is leading with an increase of 11.7 pts.

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Q1 2011Q1 2012

Page 24: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO MECHANISMS(WU)PROMO MECHANISMS(WU)Products with consumer benefits per retailer

HARD DISCOUNTCASH&CARRY

In Cash&Carry METRO registered a positive evolution of +2.8 pts vs. previous year.

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Q1 2011Q1 2012

Page 25: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO MECHANISMSPROMO MECHANISMS

Virtual Promo

Tpr (Temporary price Reduction)

Instore Event

Consumer pack

+40,9

%

+40,9

%

+0.9 pt

+0.9 pt

+0.3 pt

Products with consumer benefits

+0.2 pt

+0.1 pt

+0.5 pt

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Q1 2012 Growth vs Y-1

What kind of Promo MechanismsRetailers are using, and their evolutionVs last year

Page 26: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PROMO MECHANISMSPROMO MECHANISMS

Virtual Promo

Tpr(Temporary price Reduction)

Instore Event

Consumer pack

+0.3 pt

Products with consumer benefits

+0.2 pt

+0.1 pt

+0.5 pt

Consumer pack 7,4% (+0.5 pt)Gifts on pack 3,9% (+0.4 pt)

Consumer pack 7,4% (+0.5 pt)Gifts on pack 3,9% (+0.4 pt)

Lottery/Games 0,6% (+0.2 pt)Others(buy back) 0,1% (-0,1 pt)

Lottery/Games 0,6% (+0.2 pt)Others(buy back) 0,1% (-0,1 pt)

1+1 gratis 0,5% (-0,1 pt)2+1 gratis 1,1% (+0,3 pt)Other VL 2,8% (-1,0 pt)X% from the 2nd product 4,6% (+1,2 pt)

1+1 gratis 0,5% (-0,1 pt)2+1 gratis 1,1% (+0,3 pt)Other VL 2,8% (-1,0 pt)X% from the 2nd product 4,6% (+1,2 pt)

Crossed price 2,3% (-2.3 pts)Cupon - (-0.1 pt)Loyalty points 2,5% (-1.0 pt)Money ticket 2,7% ( +0.4 pt)Price discount(loyalty card or not) 20,7% (+3.1 pts)Special price 0,3% (+0,1 pt)

Crossed price 2,3% (-2.3 pts)Cupon - (-0.1 pt)Loyalty points 2,5% (-1.0 pt)Money ticket 2,7% ( +0.4 pt)Price discount(loyalty card or not) 20,7% (+3.1 pts)Special price 0,3% (+0,1 pt)

Q1 2012 vs 2011

+40,9

%

+40,9

%

+0.9 pt

+0.9 pt

Q1 2012 Growth vs Y-1

Page 27: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Products with consumer benefits

PROMO MECHANISMSPROMO MECHANISMS

-7.3 pts

+2.7 pts

-6.5 pts

+7.6 pts

+2.4 pts

+6.7 pts

+7.0 pts

+0.6 pt

+9.1 pts

+50.5 pts

+2.2 pts

-3.2 pts

-2.3 pts

FOOD CATEGORY

NON FOOD CATEGORY

Q1 2012 vs 2011

+40,9

%

+40,9

%

+0.9 pt

+0.9 pt

Q1 2012 Growth vs Y-1

Page 28: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

3 – QUALITY KPI3 – QUALITY KPI

Page 29: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

VISIBILITY INDICATORVISIBILITY INDICATOR

Number of WU/page

Q1 2012 vs 2011

The most readable is Profi

Page 30: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

COMPLEXITY INDICATORCOMPLEXITY INDICATOR

-8%

+5%

-1%

+6%

+1%

+1%

0%

+10%

+78%

+5%

We can easily see that BILLA is using at least 1 Consumer Advantage on 80% of the promoted articles,

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 31: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

COMPLEXITY INDICATORCOMPLEXITY INDICATOR

0 mechanisms

1 mechanism 2 mechanisms

3 mechanisms

Number of Promo mechanisms / item

(HM,HDD, SM & CC, on Food &Non Food)

The most complex or less complex(classified by the number of products with 2 or more mechanisms)

The indicator of complexity is to indicate the level of complexity of the offers of the retailers. As a retailer will have several mechanisms on a promoted item, it will be poorly ranked.

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 32: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

RETAILERS SUMMARYRETAILERS SUMMARY

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 33: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

CarrefourCarrefourPressure Offer

Consumer advantagesBrands Share

Food Market

Hypermarket

National

BrandsPrivate Label

Unbranded

-3,7pts+5,2pt

s

-1,5pts

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

-2,8pts

+2,8pts

FOOD

NON-FOOD

TEXTILES

+13,5%

Quantity of WU

+26,7%

+2,7%

Consumer pack 8,61% +3 ptsInstore Event 0,52% +0,1 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 17,00% +3,5 ptsVirtual promo 13,73% -7,3 pts1+1 gratis 0,07% -0,2 pts2+1 gratis 0,28% +0,2 ptsOther VL 0,09% -

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 13,28% -7,3 pts

Consumer pack 8,61% +3 ptsInstore Event 0,52% +0,1 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 17,00% +3,5 ptsVirtual promo 13,73% -7,3 pts1+1 gratis 0,07% -0,2 pts2+1 gratis 0,28% +0,2 ptsOther VL 0,09% -

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 13,28% -7,3 pts

Quantity of WU

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 34: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

CoraCoraPressure Offer

Brands Share

Market

Hypermarket

National

Brands

Private Label

Unbranded

+2,6pts

+2,1pts

-4,5pts

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

+10,2pts

-7,5pts

-2,8pts FOOD

NON-FOOD

TEXTILES

+13,5%

Quantity of WU

-1,4%

+2,7%

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 4,94% -0,9 ptInstore Event 0,21% -

TPR (Temporary price Reduction) 52,33% -1,1 ptVirtual promo 2,22% +0,3 pt1+1 gratis 0,02% -0,1 pt2+1 gratis 0,17% -0.4 ptOther VL 0,05% -0,1 ptX% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 1,99% +1 pt

Consumer pack 4,94% -0,9 ptInstore Event 0,21% -

TPR (Temporary price Reduction) 52,33% -1,1 ptVirtual promo 2,22% +0,3 pt1+1 gratis 0,02% -0,1 pt2+1 gratis 0,17% -0.4 ptOther VL 0,05% -0,1 ptX% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 1,99% +1 pt

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 35: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

RealRealPressure Offer

Brands Share

Market

Hypermarket

National

Brands

Private Label

Unbranded

+4,7pts

-0,6pt

-4,2pts

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

-6,8pts

+4,2pts

+2,6pts

FOOD

NON-FOOD

TEXTILES

+13,5%

Quantity of WU

+27,1%

+2,7%

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 13,80% +1,4 ptInstore Event 1,10% -TPR (Temporary price Reduction) 23,42% -1,2 ptVirtual promo 5,57% +1 pt1+1 gratis 2,66% +0,9 pt2+1 gratis 2,20% +0,1 ptOther VL 0,17% -0,4 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 0,55% +0,4 pt

Consumer pack 13,80% +1,4 ptInstore Event 1,10% -TPR (Temporary price Reduction) 23,42% -1,2 ptVirtual promo 5,57% +1 pt1+1 gratis 2,66% +0,9 pt2+1 gratis 2,20% +0,1 ptOther VL 0,17% -0,4 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 0,55% +0,4 pt

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 36: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

KauflandKauflandPressure Offer

Offer/Brands

Market

Hypermarket

National

Brands

Private Label

Unbranded

+2,4pts

-1,0pt

-1,4pt

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

-1,6pt

+3,9pts

-2,3ptsFOOD

NON-FOOD

TEXTILES

+13,5%

Quantity of WU

+6,0%

+2,7%

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 6,52% +0,3 ptInstore Event 0,03% -0,2 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 60,21% -0,2 ptVirtual promo 0,73% -1+1 gratis 0,17% -0,3 pt2+1 gratis - -0,1 ptOther VL - -0,1 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 0,56% +0,5 pt

Consumer pack 6,52% +0,3 ptInstore Event 0,03% -0,2 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 60,21% -0,2 ptVirtual promo 0,73% -1+1 gratis 0,17% -0,3 pt2+1 gratis - -0,1 ptOther VL - -0,1 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 0,56% +0,5 pt

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 37: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

BillaBillaPressure Offer

Brands Share

Market

Supermarket

National

BrandsPrivate Label

Unbranded

-0,3pt-1,2pt

+1,5pt

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

+3,2pts-1,2pt

-1,9ptFOOD

NON-FOOD

TEXTILES

Quantity of WU

-8,1%

+40,9%

+2,7%

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 7,85% +0,9 ptInstore Event 0,37% +0,3 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 63,58% -4,4 ptsVirtual promo 14,40% -3,6 pts1+1 gratis 0,22% -2,5 pts2+1 gratis 5,51% +2,6 ptsOther VL - -0,1 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 8,66% -3,6 pts

Consumer pack 7,85% +0,9 ptInstore Event 0,37% +0,3 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 63,58% -4,4 ptsVirtual promo 14,40% -3,6 pts1+1 gratis 0,22% -2,5 pts2+1 gratis 5,51% +2,6 ptsOther VL - -0,1 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 8,66% -3,6 pts

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 38: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Mega ImageMega ImagePressure Offer

Brands Share

National

Brands

Private Label Unbranded

+3,5pts

+2,4pts

-5,9pts

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

-5,1pts

+7,7pts FOOD

NON-FOOD

Quantity of WU

Supermarket-8,1%

+27,9%

+2,7%Market

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 17,36% +11,2 ptsInstore Event - -0,1 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 3,23% -1,8 ptVirtual promo 6,64% +2,5 pts1+1 gratis 0,38% -2+1 gratis 0,19% -Other VL 0,85% +0,8 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 5,22% +1,6 pt

Consumer pack 17,36% +11,2 ptsInstore Event - -0,1 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 3,23% -1,8 ptVirtual promo 6,64% +2,5 pts1+1 gratis 0,38% -2+1 gratis 0,19% -Other VL 0,85% +0,8 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 5,22% +1,6 pt

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 39: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

InterexInterexPressure Offer

Brands Share

National

Brands

Private Label

Unbranded

-7,4pts

+4,2pts

+3,1pts

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

-2,4pts

+4,9pts

-2,5pts

FOODNON-FOOD

TEXTILES

Quantity of WU

Supermarket-8,1%

-28,0%

+2,7%Market

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 7,65% -2,7 ptsInstore Event 0,30% -0,2 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 58,11% +7,9 ptsVirtual promo 2,82% -1,5 pt1+1 gratis - -0,6 pt2+1 gratis 0,30% -0,3 ptOther VL - -0,1 ptX% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 2,52% -0,3 pt

Consumer pack 7,65% -2,7 ptsInstore Event 0,30% -0,2 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 58,11% +7,9 ptsVirtual promo 2,82% -1,5 pt1+1 gratis - -0,6 pt2+1 gratis 0,30% -0,3 ptOther VL - -0,1 ptX% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 2,52% -0,3 pt

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 40: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

ProfiProfiPressure Offer

Brands Share

National

BrandsPrivate Label

Unbranded

-6,5pts+9,3pts

-2,8pts

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

+19,7pts

-8,6ptsFOOD

NON-FOOD

Quantity of WU

Supermarket-8,1%

-15,1%

+2,7%Market

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 9,86% -2,1 ptsInstore Event - -1,3 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 57,39% +3,2 ptsVirtual promo 0,29% +0,2 pt1+1 gratis - -2+1 gratis - -Other VL - -

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 0,29% +0,2 pt

Consumer pack 9,86% -2,1 ptsInstore Event - -1,3 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 57,39% +3,2 ptsVirtual promo 0,29% +0,2 pt1+1 gratis - -2+1 gratis - -Other VL - -

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 0,29% +0,2 pt

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 41: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

PennyPennyPressure Offer

Brands Share

Hard Discount

National

BrandsPrivate Label

Unbranded

+3,9pts

-1,2pt

-2,6pts

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

-2,6pts

-1,5pt

+4,1pts

FOOD

NON-FOOD

TEXTILES

Quantity of WU

-4,8%

-3,6%

+2,7%Market

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 8,06% -1,2 ptInstore Event 2,12% +2,1 ptsTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 40,20% +0,1 ptVirtual promo 3,70% +0,7 pt1+1 gratis 0,27% -2+1 gratis 0,16% -0,4 ptOther VL 0,11% -1 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 3,16% +2,1 pts

Consumer pack 8,06% -1,2 ptInstore Event 2,12% +2,1 ptsTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 40,20% +0,1 ptVirtual promo 3,70% +0,7 pt1+1 gratis 0,27% -2+1 gratis 0,16% -0,4 ptOther VL 0,11% -1 pt

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 3,16% +2,1 pts

Consumer advantages

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Page 42: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

LidlLidlPressure Offer

Offer/Brands

Market

Hard Discount

National Brands

Private Label

Unbranded

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

FOOD

NON-FOOD

TEXTILES

Quantity of WU

-3,6%

+2,7%

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 0,69%

Instore Event -TPR (Temporary price Reduction) 15,01%

Virtual promo -1+1 gratis -2+1 gratis -Other VL -

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) -

Consumer pack 0,69%

Instore Event -TPR (Temporary price Reduction) 15,01%

Virtual promo -1+1 gratis -2+1 gratis -Other VL -

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) -

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 43: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

MetroMetroPressure Offer

Offer/Brands

Market

Cash&Carry

National

BrandsPrivate Label

Unbranded

-0,8pt+4,5pt

s

-3,7pts

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

-5,3pts

+4,1pts

+1,2ptFOOD

NON-FOOD

TEXTILES

Quantity of WU

-9,0%

-7,4%

+2,7%

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 4,89% -0,8 ptInstore Event 1,65% +0,1 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 4,32% -2,2 ptsVirtual promo 22,38% +6,1 pts1+1 gratis 0,35% -2+1 gratis 2,03% +0,4 ptOther VL 8,54% -3,4 pts

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 11,46% +9,1 pts

Consumer pack 4,89% -0,8 ptInstore Event 1,65% +0,1 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 4,32% -2,2 ptsVirtual promo 22,38% +6,1 pts1+1 gratis 0,35% -2+1 gratis 2,03% +0,4 ptOther VL 8,54% -3,4 pts

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 11,46% +9,1 pts

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 44: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

SelgrosSelgrosPressure Offer

Share ofBrands

Market

Cash&Carry

National

Brands

Private Label

Unbranded

-0,6pt

+0,6pt

-0,1pt

Quantity of WU

Quantity of PO

+2,9pts

-3,1pts

+0,1ptFOOD

NON-FOOD

TEXTILES

Quantity of WU

-9,0%

-10,3%

+2,7%

Quantity of WU

Consumer pack 5,47% -0,6 ptInstore Event 0,57% -0,6 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 4,84% +3 ptsVirtual promo 11,62% -1,3 pt1+1 gratis 0,13% -0,1 pt2+1 gratis 0,74% -Other VL 10,02% -

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 0,73% -0,9 pt

Consumer pack 5,47% -0,6 ptInstore Event 0,57% -0,6 ptTPR (Temporary price Reduction) 4,84% +3 ptsVirtual promo 11,62% -1,3 pt1+1 gratis 0,13% -0,1 pt2+1 gratis 0,74% -Other VL 10,02% -

X% From the 2nd product (identical or not) 0,73% -0,9 pt

Consumer advantages

Q1 2012 vs 2011

Promo Review of food retailers in 20’top

Page 45: RO promo review Q1 12 vs 11

Thank you for your attention

Florentina VasileProject Manager [email protected]+40 (0) 743 216 282

I remain at your disposal for further information or a life demo

Follow us on social networks for more Markets Intelligence