roadmap for the underprepared:

37
Roadmap for the Underprepared: Creating Success Highways by Institutionalizin g Early Interventions

Upload: sofia

Post on 10-Jan-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Roadmap for the Underprepared:. Creating Success Highways by Institutionalizing Early Interventions. The Road Crew…. Joan Kindle , Associate Provost Kimberley Polly , Mathematics Instructor Laura LaBauve , Associate Dean Multicultural Learning Kathi Nevels , - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Roadmap for the

Underprepared:

Creating Success Highways by Institutionalizing Early Interventions

Page 2: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

The Road Crew… Joan Kindle,

Associate Provost Kimberley Polly,

Mathematics Instructor

Laura LaBauve,

Associate Dean Multicultural Learning

Kathi Nevels, Student Development Professor

Page 3: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Today’s Map… Harper College Context Overview of Three Intervention Pathways for the

Underprepared High School/Community College Partnership REACH Summer Bridge Program Project Success: Early Intervention

Value of Integration and Institutionalization— Discussion and Questions

Page 4: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Harper College Demographics Credit Headcount = 17,000 Full time Equivalent = 10,170 Caucasian = 58% Female = 56% Developmental Math = 43% Developmental English = 15% Developmental Reading = 18% High School Headcount = 28,000 High School Graduates = 6,600 % Graduates Enroll at Harper = 35%

Page 5: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Beginning the Student Success Journey

Joined ATD in 2009 Achievement Gaps:

Developmental Ed Developmental Math African American

Students

New President 2009 New Strategic Plan

2010- Building Community Through Student Success

Northwest Educational Council for Student Success 2010

Merged Academic and Student Affairs 2010

Page 6: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

The Result….. Bringing all units

across the college and the district together to build a new, proactive and more personalized pathway from high school to Harper and through Harper to graduation.

Page 7: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership… Why did we do this?

Shared data opened doors for communication.

Districts were not aware that about 56% of their graduates who came to us were placing into developmental math.

Districts were not aware that there existing “catch-all” senior math course had the wrong topics.

Districts were not aware that about 1/3 of their graduates were coming to Harper.

Common Core.

Page 8: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership…How did we start?

Harper and District 211 begin COMPASS testing of high school juniors

Page 9: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership… Course Alignment Begins

Project to align high school algebra 2

and Harper’s intermediate algebra.

Shared syllabi and final exams.

Math faculty from all 12 feeder high schools and Harper jointly write a test bank for a common final (for high school and Harper students.) Common final given in May 2012.

Results helped to foster more communication.

Page 10: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership…

Need math senior year

Development Math Percentage with no senior math class

051: Arithmetic 74%

055: Pre-Algebra 42%

060: Beginning Algebra 53%

080: Intermediate Algebra 39%

Page 11: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership…

Used Compass math test in junior year to encourage senior math enrollment

Percentage of Juniors Who Enrolled in Senior Math

Year College Track Algebra 2 Junior Year

Regular Track Algebra 2 Junior Year

Fall 2009 85% 76%

Fall 2010 89% 89%

Page 12: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership… Need developmental math

option for senior year. Many students have “passed”

high school algebra 1, geometry and algebra 2 but do not meet requirements for AP or dual credit coursework senior year.

New senior math course created. Replaced high school trig/stat class with Harper’s MTH080 class. Only 4 trig questions on ACT out

of 60 questions.

Page 13: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership… 1st Check: Freshmen Year

Communicate to parents that their child will need 4 years of high school math.

In 1973, 72% of jobs required a high school diploma or less. That dropped to 41% in 2007 and is projected to drop to 38% in 2018.

Many certificate and 2-year programs require some sort of math competency.

Page 14: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership… 2nd Check: Junior Year End

o Look at multiple measureso ACT math scoreo Compass placement scoreo MTH080 final exam score

o Place in correct senior matho Upper STEM: AP Calco Upper Non-STEM: AP Statso STEM: dual credit MTH103o Non-STEM: dual credit MTH101 (Quant Lit)o Those not ready: MTH080

Page 15: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership… 3rd Check: Senior Mid-Year

o Over 90% of the district seniors are enrolling in senior math, but completion rates are a concern.

o Intervention needed with student, counselor and parent(s).

o Not successfully completing a math course senior year costs time and money. MTH060 + MTH080 + repeat = $1470.

o Waste 3 semesters getting to college-level math and many never get there when they have to repeat high school-level coursework.

o Of those students who start in the lowest 2 developmental math classes, only about 14% make it out of developmental math.

Page 16: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Mathematics Partnership…

4th Check: End of Senior Year

for those taking MTH080 and

going to Harper after graduation

o If they pass the MTH080 final, they are told to register right away for a college-level math course.

o If they do not pass the MTH080 final, they are given access to MyMathTest to help prep for the Compass placement exam.

o 7% increase in college-level math o 11% decrease in the lowest developmental math class (050

level classes)

Page 17: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Bridge to Harper…for the underprepared.

Page 18: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

REACH Summer Bridge…

Student Profile Two developmental

courses or a sequence of developmental courses

Emphasis on students of color

Program Intensive, two-week program

Pre and Post COMPASS exam 6 cohorts grouped by math

level Academic workshops by faculty

Math, Reading and Writing Workshops by counselors

Personal, financial and social issues associated with attending college

Page 19: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

REACH Summer Bridge…

Desired Outcomes: Improve placement scores

Overall performance:

11% tested into ALL college-level courses 34% tested into at least one college-level course 80% increased placement scores in at least one area

 

Content area performance:

26% tested OUT of Reading 32% tested into college-level ENG101 11% tested into a college-level Math course

Page 20: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

REACH Summer Bridge…

Desired Outcomes: Increase the number of students who immediately start the developmental sequence.

98% testing into developmental RDG began the sequence (ATD comparison group - 60%)

73% testing into developmental ENG began the sequence (ATD comparison group - 54%)

86% testing into developmental MTH began the sequence (ATD comparison group - 43%)

Page 21: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

REACH Summer Bridge…

Desired Outcomes: Increase the success rate of students who enroll in developmental courses.

90% of students taking a developmental RDG099 course successfully completed (ATD comparison group – 62%)

53% of students taking a developmental ENG100 course successfully completed (ATD comparison group – 60%)

48% of students taking a developmental MTH080 course successfully completed. (ATD comparison group – 22%)

Page 22: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

REACH Summer Bridge…

Desired Outcomes: Increase the progression of developmental students through the developmental sequence.

64% of students successfully completing RDG090 enrolled in RDG099 (ATD comparison group – 47%)

88% of students successfully completing ENG098 enrolled in ENG100 (ATD comparison group – 39%)

80% of students successfully completing MTH050 enrolled in MTH060 (ATD comparison group – 72%)

60% of students successfully completing MTH060 enrolled in MTH080 (ATD comparison group – 67%)

Page 23: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

REACH Summer Bridge…

Desired Outcomes: Success and Persistence

64% of the REACH students obtained a 2.0 or higher Fall GPA (ATD comparison group - 45%)

The Fall to Spring persistence rate of REACH students - 80% (Institutional average is 73.1%)

Page 24: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

REACH Summer Bridge…

Desired Outcomes: Increase student engagement with & understanding of college

97% more familiar with campus resources 97% could identify reasons for being in college 89% felt a sense of community and belonging 97% understood Harper’s educational policies and

procedures

Page 25: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

REACH Summer Bridge…

Institutionalization Growth of Student Cohort

from a 34 student pilot to 125 students Scaling to 225 – meeting the needs of district high schools Expanding to integrate with the high schools-- reach juniors

Incremental Growth Model Manage cohort size Increase faculty involvement Facility management Incremental budget requests

Page 26: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

REACH Summer Bridge…

Transformation

From Summer to Fall

Fall enrollment in First Year Seminar

time management; study skills; career planning; and

transfer/educational Planning

Math, Reading, English ‘mini’ cohorts

Learning Communities

Mandatory Meetings with Counselors – Case Management

Tracking students during Spring semester and beyond

Involvement in Early Alert

Page 27: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Project Success: Early Alert…

Target Population First-year students who are recent

high school graduates Place and enroll in two or more

developmental courses or levels of developmental courses

Approximately 800 – 900 identified 335 students chosen for Fall 2011

Pilot

Page 28: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Project Success: Process

Faculty sent surveys at Week 4 and Week 6 to “flag” students in need of assistance

“Flagged” students assigned a counselor and meet with counselor to develop a success plan

Counselors refer students to other support services as needed, continue to monitor student progress and “close the loop” with faculty

Page 29: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Project Success: Results

278 faculty had one or more of the 335 pilot students in their classes

191 (69%) of the faculty in the pilot completed the survey

189 (56%) of the pilot students were flagged for concerns

145 (77%) of flagged students met with their counselor

Page 30: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Project Success: Results

Pilot students persisted Fall-to-Spring at a higher rate than students in the Control Group 80% for Pilot students; 77.2% for Control Group

Pilot students had a higher Completer Success Rate for All Courses than students in the Control Group 60.6% for Pilot students; 58.4% for Control Group

Pilot students overall had a slightly higher Completer Success Rate for Developmental Courses than students in the Control Group 62% for Pilot students; 61% for Control Group

Page 31: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Project Success: ResultsMore pronounced positive results when

compare students who saw counselors vs. those who did not

Fall-to-Spring Persistence

Cohort Counselor No Counselor Difference

PS – Flagged 82.1% 47.7% 34.4

PS - Not Flagged 94.8% 83.0% 11.8

Control Group 88.3% 67.1% 21.2

Page 32: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Project Success: ResultsCompleter Success Rate – All Courses

Cohort Counselor No Counselor Difference

PS – Flagged 58.6% 28.6% 30

PS - Not Flagged 72.3% 72.7% -.4

Control Group 70.1% 46.8% 23.3

Completer Success Rate – Developmental Courses

Cohort Counselor No Counselor Difference

PS – Flagged 58.6% 31.9% 26.7

PS - Not Flagged 76.8% 75.5% 1.3

Control Group 74.4% 48.6% 25.8

Page 33: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Project Success: Lessons Learned

What worked…

Faculty Participation - Liaison Project Success Specialist Counselor – Student Appointment

What we changed for 2012/2013 Pilot… Pre-assign counselors to all pilot students Include all REACH students Monitor for the full year Revise survey timing: 1) Weeks 4-6 and 2) Week 11 Add faculty referrals to academic support services Use “Kudos” feature in Starfish

Page 34: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Project Success: Results Fall ‘12

300 faculty had one or more of the 389 pilot students in their classes

189 (63%) of the faculty in the pilot completed the survey

245 (63%) of the pilot students were flagged for concerns

182 (74%) of flagged students met with their counselor

Page 35: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Awarded more than 4,400 degrees and certificates for FY2012, an increase of more than 600 from last year.

Page 36: Roadmap  for the Underprepared:

Discussion Time