robert socolow princeton university
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Climate Change Mitigation under Strong Carbon Constraints
Robert SocolowPrinceton University
[email protected] 28, 2007
50th Anniversary of the Global CO2 Record Symposium and Celebration, Nov. 28-30, 2007, Kona, Hawaii
![Page 2: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
From Dave Keeling’s autobiography
“Rewards and penalties of monitoring the earth,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 1998, Vol. 23, pp. 25-82.
A safe approach is just to remain an interested observer of the unfolding scientific evidence of man-made global climate change and its possible significance to human welfare. Without risk one can comment dispassionately…I believe, however, that a more prudent attitude would be to heed the rise in atmosphericCO2 concentration as serious unless proven to be benign. (p. 76)
![Page 3: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The mitigation thread through this symposium (1 of 2)
1. The previous session and this talk
2. Thursday, 4:30 p.m.“Ozone Depletion: The Story of a Successful International Agreement and Its Relevance For Climate Change” (Susan Solomon)
3. FridayA. Canonical mitigation
i. Renewable energy (Charles Kutscher)ii. CO2 capture and storage (Julio Friedmann)
![Page 4: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The mitigation thread through this symposium (2 of 2)
3. Friday (continued)B. Geoengineering
i. Albedo modification (David Keith)ii. Modification of the ocean sink (David Karl)
C. Regional effortsi. California’s A.B. 32 (Fran Pavley)ii. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (Joanne Morin)iii. Western Governors’ Association (David Van’t Hof)
D. Economic tools & financial incentives (Mike Walsh)
![Page 5: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Outline of Talk
1. Bridging the gap between stabilization targets and mitigation activity with the “wedge” model.
2. Wedges of efficiency and wedges of substitution for conventional coal.
3. A new role for environmental scientists: Assessors of the environmental consequences of “solutions.”
4. Parting thoughts for Bali: Equitable mitigation.
![Page 6: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Past, present, and potential future levels of carbon in the atmosphere
Rosetta Stone: To raise the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere by one part per million:
add 7.7 billion tons of CO2,
in which are 2.1 billon tons of carbon.
Billions of tons of carbon
“Doubled” CO2
TodayPre-Industrial
Glacial
3000
4400
22001500
billions of
ATMOSPHERE
(570)
(285)(190)
Billions of tons of carbon
“Doubled” CO2
TodayPre-Industrial
Glacial
billions of tons CO2
ATMOSPHERE
(ppm)
(570)
(380)
(285)(190)
HEADROOM
![Page 7: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
About half of the carbon we burn stays in the atmosphere for centuries
≈8 ≈7 = 15Ocean Land Biosphere (net)
Fossil FuelBurning
+
30
800billion tons carbon
billion tons go in
ATMOSPHERE
billion tons added every year
= billion tons go out
Ocean Land Biosphere (net)
Fossil FuelBurning
+
3000billion tons CO2
15billion
tons go in
ATMOSPHERE
billion tons added every year
![Page 8: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
On the heels of Mauna Loa measurements of the CO2
concentration…
…came CO2 emissions inventories!
![Page 9: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
GtCO2/yr
0
30
60
1950 2000 2050 2100
Historical Emissions
6
Historicalemissions
![Page 10: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
6
Interim Goal
GtCO2/yr
Current p
ath = “r
amp”
Historicalemissions Flat path
Stabilization Triangle
0
30
60
1950 2000 2050 2100
The Stabilization Triangle
Tougher CO2 target
~500 ppm
~850 ppm
Easier CO2 target
Today and for the interim goal, global per-capita emissions are ≈ 4 tCO2/yr.
![Page 11: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
6
Interim Goal
GtCO2/yr
Current p
ath = “r
amp”
Historicalemissions Flat path
Stabilization Triangle
0
30
60
1950 2000 2050 2100
The 2oC Variant is still tougher
Tougher CO2 target
~500 ppm
~850 ppm
Easier CO2 target
2oC3oC
![Page 12: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
300 kWh/month when all coal-power (600 kWh/month, natural-gas-power)
d) Use lights and appliances
Natural gas, average house, average climatec) Heat home
10,000 miles/yrb) Fly
10,000 miles/yr, 30 miles per gallona) Drive
Amount producing 4tCO2/yr (1tC/yr) emissionsActivity
Four ways to emit 4 tonCO2/yr
![Page 13: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
6
GtCO2/yr
Current p
ath = “r
amp”
Flat path
0
30
60
1950 2000 2050 2100
Stabilization Wedges
16 GtC/y
Eight “wedges”
Interim Goal
![Page 14: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What is a “Wedge”?A “wedge” is a strategy to reduce carbon emissions that grows in 50 years from zero to 4 GtCO2/yr. The strategy has already been commercialized at scale somewhere.
4 GtCO2/yr
50 years
Total = 100 Gigatons CO2
A “solution” to the CO2 problem should provide at least one wedge.
Cumulatively, a wedge redirects the flow of 100 GtCO2 in its first 50 years. This is three trillion dollars at $30/tCO2.
![Page 15: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
ElectricityTransportation
Heating, other
Electricity: 40%; fuels used directly: 60%.
Allocation of 6.2 GtC/yr (22.7 GtCO2/yr) emitted in 2000
Global CO2 Emissions by Sector and Fuel
![Page 16: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Energy Efficiency
Decarbonized Electricity
Fuel Displacement by Low-Carbon Electricity
Extra Carbon in Forests, Soils, Oceans
DecarbonizedFuels
2007 205730 GtCO2/yr
60 GtCO2/yr
MethaneManagement
TriangleStabilization
Fill the Stabilization Triangle with Eight Wedges in six broad categories
![Page 17: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
“The Wedge Model is the iPod of climate change: You fill it with your favorite things.”
David Hawkins, NRDC, 2007.
Therefore, prepare to negotiate with others, who have different favorite things.
![Page 18: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
U.S. Wedges
Source: Lashof and Hawkins, NRDC, in Socolow and Pacala, Scientific American, September 2006, p. 5700
![Page 19: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Now we go on a hunt for wedges!
Priorities:
•Efficiency wedges
•Wedges displacing conventional coal power
![Page 20: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Efficient Use of FuelEfficient Use of Fuel
Effort needed by 2055 for 1 wedge:
Note: 1 car driven 10,000 miles at 30 mpg emits 4 tons of CO2.2 billion cars driven 10,000 miles per year at 60 mpg instead of 30 mpg.
2 billion cars driven, at 30 mpg, 5,000 instead of 10,000 miles per year.
Property-tax systems that reinvigorate cities and discourage sprawl
Video-conferencing
![Page 21: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Efficient Use of ElectricityEfficient Use of Electricity
lightingmotors cogeneration
Effort needed by 2055 for 1 wedge:.25% reduction in expected 2055 electricity use in commercial andresidential buildings
Target: Commercial and multifamily buildings.
![Page 22: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Coal-electricity Wedges
700 modern 1-GW coal plants, with CO2 vented, will emit 4 GtCO2 each year (6 MtCO2/yr per plant).*
Electricity-carbon wedges result from not building such plants.
*For example, 90% capacity factor, 50% efficient.
![Page 23: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Graphics courtesy of DOE Office of Fossil Energy
Effort needed by 2055 for 1 wedge:Carbon capture and storage (CCS) at 800 GW coal power plants.
CCS at “coal-to-liquids” plants producing 30 million barrels per day.
Coal with Carbon Capture and StorageCoal with Carbon Capture and Storage
Graphic courtesy of Statoil ASA
![Page 24: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Natural CO2 fields in southwest U.S.• McElmo Dome, Colorado: 1500 MtCO2 in place• 800 km pipeline from McElmo Dome to Permian Basin, west
Texas, built in the 1980s for enhanced oil recovery
Two conclusions:
1. CO2 in the right place is valuable.
2. CO2 from McElmo was a better bet than CO2 from any nearby site of fossil fuel burning.
![Page 25: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Already, in the middle of the Sahara!
At In Salah, Algeria, natural gas purification by CO2 removal plus CO2 pressurization for nearby injection
Separation at amine contactor towers
![Page 26: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Wind ElectricityWind Electricity
Effort needed by 2055 for 1 wedge:One million 2-MW windmills displacing coal power.
2006: 75,000 MW (4%)
Prototype of 80 m tall Nordex 2,5 MW wind turbine located in Grevenbroich, Germany(Danish Wind Industry Association)
![Page 27: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Photovoltaic PowerPhotovoltaic Power
Effort Needed by 2055 for one wedge:
2000 GWpeak (400 x current capacity)
2 million hectares(80 x 100 miles)
Graphics courtesy of DOE Photovoltaics Program
![Page 28: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)Concentrating Solar Power (CSP)
Source: Noah Kaye, SEIA, April 2007
Effort Needed by 2055 for one wedge:
2000 GWpeak
2 million hectares*(80 x 100 miles)
*assumes same 10% site-conversion efficiency as PV
![Page 29: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Effort needed by 2055 for 1 wedge:700 GW (twice current capacity) displacing coal power.
Nuclear ElectricityNuclear Electricity
Graphic courtesy of NRC
Phase out of nuclear power creates the need for another half wedge.
![Page 30: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Retrievable Storage
Site: Surry station, James River, VA; 1625 MW since 1972-73,. Credit: Dominion.
The nuclear industry may soon seek to renegotiate its social contract regarding nuclear waste, asking for a change of goal: retrievable storage instead of irretrievable storage.
![Page 31: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Needed: A New International Regime
Pictured: A cascade of centrifuges for uranium enrichment.
![Page 32: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Every wedge strategy can be implemented well or poorly
Every wedge has a dark side, generating opposition that thwarts implementation.
Conservation RegimentationRenewables Competing uses of landNuclear power Nuclear war“Clean coal” Mining: worker and land impacts
“Solution science” is emerging: the study of the environmental and social costs and benefits of stabilization strategies.
![Page 33: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
A new role for environmental scientists: Assessors of the environmental consequences of “solutions”
•Ocean fertilization
•Injection of particles into the stratosphere
•Modification of the boundary layer by large-scale deployment of wind farms
•Modification of the boundary layer and the hydrocycle by large-scale deforestation and reforestation
![Page 34: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Parting thoughts for Bali: A new look at equitable mitigation
![Page 35: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Source: Adrian Ross
CO2 emissions, OECD and non-OECD, 1860-2003
0
1
2
3
4
1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
Ann
ual C
O2
emis
sion
s fro
m fo
ssil-
fuel
s (G
TonC
)
OECDNOECD
Total, 1860-2003:OECD: 186 GtC (64%)Non-OECD: 106 GtC (36%)
![Page 36: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
OECD and non-OECD shares
SourceI Socolow and Pacala, Scientific American, September 2006, p.56
![Page 37: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
CO2 emissions in 2030 by the world’s individuals
2030: 43 GtCO2/yr anticipated.Emissions are lined up from richest to poorest person
Target of 30 GtCO2/yr (“30”) is achieved by a cap on individual emissions at 11.5 tCO2/yr, affecting 1.0 billion people.
Cap is reduced to 10.1 tCO2/yr (“30P”), affecting 1.2 billion people, if Millennium Development Goals are also addressed.
![Page 38: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Four comparable assignments!
USAChina Rest of world
Rest of OECD
3030P
![Page 39: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
A world transformed by deliberate attention to carbon
A world with the same total CO2 emissions in 2057 as in 2007 will also have:
1. Institutions for carbon management that reliably communicate theprice of carbon.
2. If wedges of nuclear power are achieved, strong international enforcement mechanisms to control nuclear proliferation.
3. If wedges of CO2 capture and storage are achieved, widespread permitting of geological storage.
4. If wedges of renewable energy and enhanced storage in forests and soils are achieved, extensive land reclamation and rural development.
5. A planetary consciousness.
Not an unhappy prospect!
![Page 40: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Never in history has the work of so few led to so much being asked of so many!
The warnings about global climate change from the climate scientists have launched a deep reexamination of the energy system and other resource-intensive aspects of ordinary living.
It is crucial that these scientists convey, as carefully as possible, what they know and how well or poorly they know it.
You have been doing this very well. Now, the stakes are rising.
![Page 41: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
From Dave Keeling’s autobiography
“Rewards and penalties of monitoring the earth,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 1998, Vol. 23, pp. 25-82.
Perhaps my success in sustaining time-series measurements will eventually raise the general scientific regard for making repetitive but important environmental measurements. Also, I hope that there will always be opportunity for individual scientists to pursue scientific leads not anticipated by committees or agencies. (p. 79)
![Page 42: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Extra Slides
![Page 43: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
From Dave Keeling’s autobiography
“Rewards and penalties of monitoring the earth,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 1998, Vol. 23, pp. 25-82.
[In 1956] Wexler invited me to Washington. There I showed him my data suggesting that the amount of CO2 in the open atmosphere might be far less variable than was generally believed… (p. 36)
[In March 1958] to our great surprise on the first day of operation [the air sampler] delivered within 1 ppm the CO2 concentration that I had told [Ben] Harlan to expect… (p. 39)
[In November 1958] I was allowed to visit Mauna Loa and restart the analyzer. As new data emerged without further interruption, the concentration rose steadily. Then, in May, it started to decline. A regular seasonal pattern began to emerge… (p. 40)
![Page 44: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
$30/tCO2 ≈ 2¢/kWh induces CCS. Three views.
CCS
Wholesale power w/o CCS: 4 ¢/kWh
Transmission and distribution
A coal-gasification power plant can capture CO2 for an added 2¢/kWh ($30/tCO2). This:
triples the price of delivered coal;
adds 50% to the busbar price of electricity from coal;
adds 20% to the household price of electricity from coal.
Coal at the power plant
2
3
1
6
Retail power w/o CCS: 10 ¢/kWh
Plant capital
![Page 45: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Benchmark: $30/tCO2
1.1¢/kWhElectricity from natural gas
2.4¢/kWh (wind and nuclear subsidies: 1.8 ¢/kWh)Electricity from coal
25¢/gallon (ethanol subsidy: 50¢/gallon) Gasoline
$70/U.S. tonCoal
$13/barrelCrude oil
$1.60/1000 scfNatural gas
Equivalent to $30/tCO2 (≈ $100/tC)Form of Energy
Carbon emission charges in the neighborhood of $30/tCO2 can enable scale-up of most of the wedges, if supplemented with sectoral policy to facilitate transition.
$30/tCO2 is the current European Trading System price for 2008 emissions.At this price, current global emissions (30 GtCO2/yr) cost $900 billion/yr, 2% of GWP.
![Page 46: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Avoid Mitigation Lite
Mitigation Lite: The right words but the wrong numbers. Companies’ investments are unchanged: the emissions price is a cost of business. Individuals change few practices.
For specificity, consider a price ramp that is not “lite,” one rising from zero to $30/tCO2 over 10 years.
0 5 10
Year of policy
$30/tCO2
CO2 emissions price
![Page 47: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Some carbon policy principles
• Establish a CO2 price schedule forceful enough to drive investment decisions.
• Make the price salient as far upstream as possible (best, when C comes out of the ground or across a border).
• Supplement the price with sectoral policies (RPS, CCS, CAFE, appliance mandates).
• Stimulate international coordination.• Allow a teething period.
![Page 48: Robert Socolow Princeton University](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071601/613d47e2736caf36b75b76e6/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
An equity-based CO2 strategy1. Meet Basic Human Needs without considering carbon.
Don’t discourage diesel engines for village-scale power or LPG for cooking.
Expect a poor family to respond to a better insulated home by raising the indoor temperature (“takeback”).
2. Attain all savings from the largest emitters
3. Mitigate uniformly for the same income level across all countries.
Coordinated development and deployment of efficient appliances, urban mass transit, videoconferencing, CO2 capture and storage, renewables, and nuclear power.