TOD Phase I Pilot Projects

Corridor I: NANGLOI - TIKRI KALAN

The Site in context

The Site in context

The Site in context

India Gate

Shah Jahanabad

Rohin

i

Dwark

a

Najafgar

h

Mundka

Industria

l

Corridor

Towards

Bahadurgarh

Delhi Border

The Site in context

Railway Line

Rohtak Road

Zone N Zone M

Zone K-

I

Zone L

Zone Total Area

(Ha)

Existing Pop

(In Lakh) ZDP Pop (In Lakh)

Designed Work force

(In Lakh)

L 22979 2.35 20 6.4

K-1 6515 5 12 4.56

M 5524 2.84 9.8 3.82

N 13975 3.5 24.17 9.42

The Site in numbers – total area

TOD Intense

Zone

- 342.5 Ha

TOD

Standard

Zone

- 662.5 Ha

NMT Zone

- 3181.6 Ha

Mundka

Rajd

hani

Park

Nanglo

i R

ailw

ay

Sta

tion

Pro

posed S

tation

1 P

roposed S

tation

2 P

roposed S

tation

3

8%

16%

76%

The Site in numbers – total area

Land Use

Area in Catchment

(In Ha)

Built up areas (In Ha)

(@40%) MPD-FAR

Total Built Up (In Ha) Total Pop.

Commercial 263.5 105.4 100.00 105.4 105,400

(@10sq.m. per person)

Source:NBC2005

Public & Semi Public 519.2 207.68 150.00 311.52 207,680

(@15sq.m. per person)

Source:NBC2005

Industrial (Predominantly

storage) 72.45 28.98 180.00 52.16 17,388

(@30sq.m. per person)

Source:NBC2005

Total working population 4,13,085

Utility 61.79

Recreational 273.14

Buffer 328.58

Agriculture 37.52

Land Use Area in Catchment

(In Ha) ZDP density

PPH Workforce

ratio Total Pop. Work Force Population

Residential (L) 271.37 250.00 0.32 67,842.50 21,709.60

Residential (K-1) 606.54 250.00 0.38 151,635.00 57,621.30

Residential (M) 25.71 250.00 0.39 6,427.50 2,506.73

Residential (N) 250.45 250.00 0.39 62,612.50 24,418.88

Total Population 2,88,517 1,06,256

12,90,800

The Site in numbers –developed area

Developed

Land

2087.7Ha

55%

Virgin Land

1677.7

Ha

45%

The Site in numbers – land utilization

Existing

dense

1233.5Ha

Existing

under-utilized

685.5Ha

Existing

green field

1677.7Ha

Restricted

168.7Ha

The Site in numbers – character districts

Dense

Resi.

Ware-

houses

Urban

Village

Indust/

Utility

Railwa

y yard

Gree

n

field

Slum/

JJ

Colony

Banquet

Halls

Character district– Dense residential

Dense

Resi.

Ware-

houses

Urban

Village

Indust/

Utility

Railwa

y yard

Gree

n

field

Slum/

JJ

Colony

Banquet

Halls

Character district– Urban Villages

Dense

Resi.

Ware-

houses

Urban

Village

Indust/

Utility

Railwa

y yard

Gree

n

field

Slum/

JJ

Colony

Banquet

Halls

Character district– Slum/ JJ Colonies

Dense

Resi.

Ware-

houses

Urban

Village

Indust/

Utility

Railwa

y yard

Gree

n

field

Slum/

JJ

Colony

Banquet

Halls

Character district– Banquet Halls

Dense

Resi.

Ware-

houses

Urban

Village

Indust/

Utility

Railwa

y yard

Gree

n

field

Slum/

JJ

Colony

Banquet

Halls

Character district– Warehouses

Dense

Resi.

Ware-

houses

Urban

Village

Indust/

Utility

Railwa

y yard

Gree

n

field

Slum/

JJ

Colony

Banquet

Halls

Character district– Industrial/ utility

Dense

Resi.

Ware-

houses

Urban

Village

Indust/

Utility

Railwa

y yard

Gree

n

field

Slum/

JJ

Colony

Banquet

Halls

Character district– Green field

Dense

Resi.

Ware-

houses

Urban

Village

Indust/

Utility

Railwa

y yard

Gree

n

field

Slum/

JJ

Colony

Banquet

Halls

The Site in numbers – ZDP uses

Land Use}

Area in Catchment (In Ha)

Residential 1,154

Commercial 263

Public & Semi Public 519

Industrial (Predominantly storage) 72

Utility 61

Recreational 273

Buffer 328

Agriculture 37

Existing building use

Predominant existing use zones

Update

Density & Social Infrastructure

Infrastructure provision

Accessibility & Movement –ZDP Roads

Accessibility & Movement – pedestrian accessibility

1.0 OPEN SPACE AND WATER STRATEGY

1.1. Zero Additional Run off

NATURE

10%

RUNOFF

100% Permeable

URBANISED CONDITION

80% Impermeable Surface

NATURALISED CONDITION

55 %

RUNOFF

10 %

RUNOFF

50% Impermeable Surface

with detention areas.

Slope Analysis

Lowest points (valleys) of the area

Open Space Structure of the Plan derived from Nature

Current ZDP greens are disconnected: Do not allow water to be conveyed Naturally

Interconnected Open Space Network allows linking of Greens

Boston Emerald Necklace

• Continuous infiltration & movement of Stormwater

• Movement of people on foot & cycle.

34

35

Disconnected open spaces are hindering formation of ecological corridors as

well as natural systems that could be used for storm water management.

Connected Open Spaces to move Water and People!

1.4. NMT network & open space structure

4.2. ZDP- Road Network

4.2. Proposed- Road Network

4.2. NMT along ZDP Roads

4.2. Proposed augmentation of NMT Network

3.0 EQUITY in CONNECTIVITY

4.2. Access to Public Transport for Slum/ JJ Colonies

New boulevard Connections

4.2. Major Civic Boulevard connecting communities

Everyone lives on Akbar Road!

1.4. Democratic Boulevards

Imli (Tamarind) Trees on Akbar Road in April & February. (Source: Trees of Delhi)

Everyone lives on Akbar Road!

4.2. Reinventing UER

Proposed

Existing

Park along road UER

UER Buffer Buffer

2.0 DENSIFICATION vs. SPRAWL

2.1. Urban Sprawl as per ZDP

2.1. Densification as per TOD regulations

Golden Gate Park, SF

Central Park, NY

Proposed Regional Park, Mundka

Giving the City a Regional Public Park

India Gate, Delhi

Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park

Japanese Tea garden

Children's’ Park

Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park

Renzo Piano Museum

Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park

Stow Lake

Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park

An Urban Forestway…

4.0 PROGRAMMING CONSIDERATIONS

4.1. Impact of ZDP- Learning From The Past

Slum/ JJ colonies along ecological areas

Future land prices might result in encroach-ment along sensitive areas

4.1. Gated Communities- Patparganj

4.1. Gated Communities- Patparganj

Civic Buffer with Open Space & Water bodies

4.1. Gated Parks

4.1. Unused Parks

Inequity due to Gated Communities

7

KEY PLAN

Streets as incidental Public Spaces & Play

Areas

4.1. Future Trends

Slum/ JJ colonies along ecological areas

Future land prices might result in encroach-ment along sensitive areas

4.1. Lal Dora villages

4.1. Lal Dora villages

The way forward

Influence Zone Plan Preparation

An Influence Zone Plan – 4 critical components A Detailed Influence Zone Plan shall be prepared by the Planning Authority to set the Vision for development of the area, based on various site characteristics.

1. Urban Design Framework

2. Transport Impact Assessment & Mitigation Strategies

3. Decentralized Infrastructure and Sustainability Plan

4. Economic Viability and Implementation Model - Ensuring Equity

An Influence Zone Plan – 4 critical components

2. Transport Impact Assessment & Mitigation Strategies:

a. Achieving the desired modal shift, in particular mode shift for short trips

b. Street network improvement through assessment of existing capacity and augmentation of network as required through new linkages, alternate routes, junction designs etc for all modes with priority for public transport, pedestrians, cyclists / NMT.

c. Integrated strategy for Public transport, Pedestrian and Cycle access

d. Determining the optimum mix of uses to mitigate negative impact on surrounding land uses and transport networks

e. Parking Strategy as a Demand Management Tool

f. Mitigation strategies for traffic noise and vibration

An Influence Zone Plan – 4 critical components

3. Decentralized Infrastructure and Sustainability Plan:

a. Water and Waste Water management strategy including recycling and re-use of

waste water. To include strategy for both potable and non-potable water.

b. Rain water strategy, to be integrated with the Landscape and Public Open Space

Strategy

c. Solid Waste Management Strategy

d. Energy Strategy maximising use of renewable sources

e. Integrated Infrastructure and Services Systems Plan indicating space requirements

for all infrastructure

An Influence Zone Plan – 4 critical components 4. Economic Viability and Implementation Model :

a. Determining a financially profitable mix of uses based on the current demand and supply, coupled with the projected land values for the TOD zone. To include cost

delivering of Social and Physical infrastructure

b. Determining a financial model and delivery mechanism for affordable housing, public infrastructure and public transport facilities through mechanisms of cross

subsidy, FAR benefits or any other possible benefit that the TOD authority can give.

c. Strategy for revenue collection from the TOD zone based on the benefits enjoyed by a piece of land lying within the TOD zone. To determine total profit generated from the TOD Zone in a phased manner for individual owners, consortiums and TOD

administration.

d. Determining appropriate mechanisms for land-pooling by individual plot holders to

avail the benefits of TOD, based on the specific characteristics of the site.

e. Determining the structure of the administrative body of the TOD zone and the cost

of operation of the body.

f. Strategy for implementing the TOD policy in the TOD zone through the principle of

award and penalty.

Influence Zone Plan Preparation – 3 months

1. With the aim to prepare a robust and deliverable Influence Zone Plan and draw conclusive policy recommendations, UTTIPEC has put-together a multi-disciplinary expert team of professional consultants for Transport Impact Assessment, Sustainable Infrastructure provision and Economic Feasibility to augment in-house skills and capacity

2. Detailed proposals from the best consultants from both within & outside the country

3. Request for sponsorship from Corporate Houses, Institutions and other Public bodies due to paucity of time

4. Letter of appeal

5. GSDl data & analysis