rotational thombectomy (rotarex©) for (sub)acute limb ... · rotational thombectomy (rotarex©)...

18
Rotational thombectomy (Rotarex©) for (sub)acute limb ischemia – a safe approach also in patients with diabetes mellitus? M. Dufner, M. Kronlage, I. Printz, B. Heilmeier, E. Blessing, O. Müller, H. Katus, C. Erbel Matthias Dufner University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

Upload: others

Post on 22-Oct-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Rotational thombectomy (Rotarex©) for(sub)acute limb ischemia – a safe approach

    also in patients with diabetes mellitus?

    M. Dufner, M. Kronlage, I. Printz, B. Heilmeier, E. Blessing, O. Müller, H. Katus, C. Erbel

    Matthias Dufner

    University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

  • Disclosure

    Speaker name:

    Matthias Dufner

    I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report:

    Consulting

    Employment in industry

    Stockholder of a healthcare company

    Owner of a healthcare company

    x Other(s): Educational Grant / Abbott

    I do not have any potential conflict of interest

  • Objective

    Compare the safety and efficacy of rotationalthrombectomy (Rotarex©) in patients with and

    without diabetes mellitus.

    source: straubmedical.com

  • Design

    • Retrospective

    • 2006-2015

    • Single-center

    • Dept. of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany

    • Non-randomized

  • Study population

    No Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus p-value

    absolut SD % absolut SD %

    146 98 67,1 48 32,9

    Characteristics

    Age (years) 66,9 11,7 68,5 10,7 0,3148

    Gender male 60 61,2 33 68,80,3744

    female 38 38,8 15 31,2

    Weight 70,9 14 80,7 12,3 0,0003

    Comorbidities

    Smoker 69 70,4 29 60,4 0,2273

    Ischemic heart disease 35 35,7 31 64,6 0,0010

    Arterial hypertension 70 71,4 43 89,6 0,0137

    Kidney failure III-V 22 22,5 14 29,2 0,3763

  • Rutherford class

    No Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus p-value

    absolut % absolut %

    146 98 67,1 48 32,9

    Rutherford class 3 68 69,4 27 56,0

    0,1212

    4 22 22,2 10 20,8

    5 3 3,1 5 10,4

    6 2 2,0 4 8,3

    n.a. 3 3,0 2 4,2

    No DM DM0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    3

    4

    5

    6

    n.a.

    Perc

    en

    tag

    e (

    %)

    n.a.: information not available

  • Lesion characteristics

    No Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus p-value

    absolut % absolut %

    146 98 67,1 48 32,9

    Major lesion

    Native vessel 67 76,1 33 68,8 0,3508

    Bypass 2 2,0 0 0,0 0,3190

    Target lesion(s)

    Iliac vessels 16 16,3 4 8,3 0,1870

    Superficial femoral artery 76 77,6 44 91,7 0,0362

    Below the knee 23 23,5 11 22,9 0,9408

    Lesion characteristics

    Length of occlusion (cm) >10 26 26,5 9 18,8 0,3009

  • Results

    1) Primary revascularization success

    No DM DM0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Perc

    en

    tag

    e (

    %)

    ns

    p = 0,7338

  • Results

    2) Periprocedural complications

    No Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus p-value

    absolut % absolut %

    146 98 67,1 48 32,9

    Major bleeding 3 3,1 2 4,2 0,7301

    Aneurysma sp. 3 3,1 1 2,1 0,7338

    AV-fistula 1 1,0 0 0,0 0,4825

    Compartment syndrome 0 0,0 0 0,0

  • Results

    3) 1 year patency

    0 100 200 300 3650

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Days elapsed

    Perc

    en

    tag

    e (

    %)

    No DM

    DM

    p = 0,1601

  • Results

    4) Survival

    0 100 200 300 3650

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Days elapsed

    Perc

    en

    tag

    e (

    %)

    Survival

    No DM

    DM

    p = 0,0787

    0 100 200 300 3650

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Days elapsed

    Perc

    en

    tag

    e (

    %)

    Event free survival

    No DM

    DM

    p = 0,1007

  • Limitations

    • Group size

    • Retrospective

    • Loss to follow up

  • Conclusion

    For (sub)acute limb ischemia, rotationalthrombectomy (Rotarex©) is a safe and effectivetechnique in patients with and without diabetes

    mellitus.

  • Thank you!

    ... and hope to see you soon in Heidelberg!

  • Further characteristics

    No Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus p-value

    absolut % absolut %

    146 98 67,1 48 32,9

    Acute ischemia 6 6,1 4 8,3 0,6193

    Critical ischemia 7 7,1 5 10,4 0,4987

    Stent 56 57,1 25 52,1 0,5634

    DCB 47 48,0 27 56,3 0,3466

    Loss to follow up (1 year) 25 22,5 10 20,8 0,5341

  • Lesion characteristics

    No Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus p-value

    absolut % absolut %

    146 98 67,1 48 32,9

    Major lesion

    Native vessel 67 76,1 33 68,8 0,3508

    Bypass 2 2,0 0 0,0 0,3190

    Target lesion(s)

    Iliacal vessels 16 16,3 4 8,3 0,1870

    Superficial femoral artery 76 77,6 44 91,7 0,0362

    Below the knee 23 23,5 11 22,9 0,9408

    Lesion characteristics

    Thrombotic burden low 33 33,7 17 35,4 0,8348

    moderate-severe 65 66,3 31 64,6

    Length of occlusion (cm) >10 26 26,5 9 18,8 0,3009

  • Lesion characteristicsNo Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus p-value

    absolut % absolut %

    146 98 67,1 48 32,9

    Rutherford 3 68 69,4 27 56,0

    0,1212

    4 22 22,2 10 20,8

    5 3 3,1 5 10,4

    6 2 2,0 4 8,3

    n.a. 3 3,0 2 4,2

    Major lesion

    Native vessel 67 76,1 33 68,8 0,3508

    Bypass 2 2,0 0 0,0 0,3190

    Target lesion(s)

    Iliacal 16 16,3 4 8,3 0,1870

    Superficial femoral artery 76 77,6 44 91,7 0,0362

    Below the knee 23 23,5 11 22,9 0,9408

    Lesion characteristics

    Length of occlusion (cm) >10 26 26,5 9 18,80,3009

  • Rotational thombectomy (Rotarex©) for(sub)acute limb ischemia – a safe approach

    also in patients with diabetes mellitus?

    M. Dufner, M. Kronlage, I. Printz, B. Heilmeier, E. Blessing, O. Müller, H. Katus, C. Erbel

    Matthias Dufner

    University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany