royal lecture: delivering the local transport plan

Download ROYAL LECTURE: DELIVERING THE LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: rhys

Post on 09-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ROYAL LECTURE: DELIVERING THE LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN. Jeremy Prince and Ben King Transport Strategy Nottingham City Council. How many trips were made on public transport in Nottingham last year?. B) 17 m. A) 7 m. C) 77 m. D) 177 m. Who are we?. Jeremy Prince and Ben King - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • ROYAL LECTURE: DELIVERING THELOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN

    Jeremy Prince and Ben KingTransport StrategyNottingham City Council

  • How many trips were made on public transport in Nottingham last year?A) 7 mB) 17 mC) 77 mD) 177 m

  • Who are we?Jeremy Prince and Ben KingTransport Partnership Officer - Principal Transport OfficerTransport StrategyNottingham City Council

  • Local Transport PlanFinal Plan submitted to DfT March 2006

    Comprehensive document

    Jointly prepared by City & County Councils

  • Key PrioritiesGovernment Objectives:CongestionAir qualityRoad safetyAccessibilityLocal Objectives:Regeneration & neighbourhood renewalQuality of LifeEfficient maintenance

  • Location MapPopulation: 630,000

  • Roads

  • Buses

  • Rail

  • Trams

  • Maintenance

  • Interchanges

  • The Evidence

  • NET Line 1

  • BeforeJunction of Maid Marian Way and Friar Lane

  • AfterJunction of Maid Marian Way and Friar Lane

  • BeforeJunction of Maid Marian Way and Mount Street

  • AfterJunction of Maid Marian Way and Mount Street

  • The Proof

  • Key Trends

    Chart1

    100100100100

    98.7102.697.383.8

    98.5103.38778.4

    99.7102.685.978.4

    101.8105.977.267.6

    100.6108.273.964.9

    8% increase

    26% decrease

    35% decrease

    0.6% increase

    Traffic

    Public Transport

    Killed or Seriously Injured

    Unemployment

    Index

    Sheet1

    200020012002200320042005

    Traffic10098.798.599.7101.8100.6

    Public Transport100102.6103.3102.6105.9108.2

    Killed or Seriously Injured10097.38785.977.273.9

    Unemployment10083.878.478.467.664.9

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • Comparative road condition in the core cities

    core cities public transport

    -0.12

    -0.11

    -0.08

    -0.04

    -0.03

    0.02

    0.02

    0.08

    % change from 2000

    core cities KSIs

    0.55678670360.35

    0.470.43

    0.51240.432

    0.8050.435

    0.56094276090.4767676768

    0.57276995310.5148669797

    0.70666666670.5166666667

    1.05238095240.6888888889

    - 9%

    - 16%

    - 46%

    - 15%

    - 10%

    - 27%

    - 35%

    (-9%) = % change

    - 37%

    1994/98

    2005

    KSIs per 1,000 resident population

    core cities road condition

    0.070.1

    0.080.136

    0.0810.175

    0.0960.229

    0.1460.198

    0.170.15

    0.1870.285

    Principal roads(Scanner surveys)

    Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)

    Road condition where immediate works are required

    pt patronage cha

    Public transport patronage

    % change

    Derby-13%

    South Yorkshire (125.2m)-12%

    West Midlands (312.5m)-11%

    Tyne and Wear (165.7m)-8%includes bus and metro

    Merseyside (162.9m)-4%includes bus and tram

    West Yorkshire (194.8m)-3%

    Greater Manchester (238.9m)2%includes bus and tram

    Leicester2%

    Greater Bristol (53.8m)2%

    Greater Nottingham (77.6m)8%includes bus and tram

    KSIs chart

    Road casualties

    Population2005 KSIs per 1,000 pop2005 KSIs94/98 KSIs per 1,000 pop1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 20002005 Child KSIs1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000

    Tyne and Wear1,083,0000.353780.5660337%43814%6714754%9630%

    Leicester City525,0000.291510.4423235%18317%184459%3244%

    Derby City285,0000.361020.5515735%1118%163148%2020%

    Greater Bristol1,000,0000.434300.474709%4617%436130%5420%

    Greater Manchester2,500,0000.4310800.51128116%11234%20530433%23613%

    West Midlands2,600,0000.441,1310.812,09346%1,59329%20941550%28527%

    Merseyside1,485,0000.487080.5683315%7647%14519726%1546%

    South Yorkshire1,278,0000.516580.5773210%6864%9515037%12222%

    West Yorkshire2,100,0000.5210850.71148427%129916%13327251%23042%

    Greater Nottingham630,0000.694341.0566335%58726%5611853%10647%

    Derbyshire690,0000.704830.9867528%61722%428349%7846%

    CORE CITIES

    1994/982005

    Tyne and Wear0.560.35

    Greater Bristol0.470.43

    Greater Manchester0.510.43

    West Midlands0.810.44

    Merseyside0.560.48

    South Yorkshire0.570.51

    West Yorkshire0.710.52

    Greater Nottingham1.050.69

    Maintenance

    Highway Maintenance% of network requiring immediate attention

    LTP areaPrincipal roads(Scanner surveys)Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)Unclassified roads

    Derby19%28%8%cvi

    Leicester13%12%6%cvi

    Greater Nottingham7%10%11%scanner

    Greater Bristol8%14%10%?

    South Yorkshire8%18%10%?

    West Yorkshire10%23%16%cvi

    Merseyside15%20%18%?

    Tyne and Wear17%15%28%cvi

    Greater Manchester19%29%

    Birminghamn/an/a13%cvi

  • Comparative public transport growth in the core cities

    core cities public transport

    -0.12

    -0.11

    -0.08

    -0.04

    -0.03

    0.02

    0.02

    0.08

    % change from 2000

    core cities KSIs

    0.55678670360.35

    0.470.43

    0.51240.432

    0.8050.435

    0.56094276090.4767676768

    0.57276995310.5148669797

    0.70666666670.5166666667

    1.05238095240.6888888889

    Based upon 2005 population estimates

    - 9%

    - 16%

    - 46%

    - 15%

    - 10%

    - 27%

    - 35%

    (-9%) = % change

    - 37%

    1994/98

    2005

    KSIs per 1,000 resident population

    Core Cities KSIs per 1,000 resident population

    core cities road condition

    0.070.1

    0.080.136

    0.0810.175

    0.0960.229

    0.1460.198

    0.170.15

    0.1870.285

    Tyne and Wear figures apply to Newcastle only

    Principal roads(Scanner surveys)

    Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)

    Road condition where immediate works are required

    Core Cities Principal and Non-Principal Road Condition 2005/6

    pt patronage cha

    Public transport patronage

    % change

    Derby-13%

    South Yorkshire (125.2m)-12%

    West Midlands (312.5m)-11%

    Tyne and Wear (165.7m)-8%includes bus and metro

    Merseyside (162.9m)-4%includes bus and tram

    West Yorkshire (194.8m)-3%

    Greater Manchester (238.9m)2%includes bus and tram

    Leicester2%

    Greater Bristol (53.8m)2%

    Greater Nottingham (77.6m)8%includes bus and tram

    KSIs chart

    Road casualties

    Population2005 KSIs per 1,000 pop2005 KSIs94/98 KSIs per 1,000 pop1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 20002005 Child KSIs1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000

    Tyne and Wear1,083,0000.353780.5660337%43814%6714754%9630%

    Leicester City525,0000.291510.4423235%18317%184459%3244%

    Derby City285,0000.361020.5515735%1118%163148%2020%

    Greater Bristol1,000,0000.434300.474709%4617%436130%5420%

    Greater Manchester2,500,0000.4310800.51128116%11234%20530433%23613%

    West Midlands2,600,0000.441,1310.812,09346%1,59329%20941550%28527%

    Merseyside1,485,0000.487080.5683315%7647%14519726%1546%

    South Yorkshire1,278,0000.516580.5773210%6864%9515037%12222%

    West Yorkshire2,100,0000.5210850.71148427%129916%13327251%23042%

    Greater Nottingham630,0000.694341.0566335%58726%5611853%10647%

    Derbyshire690,0000.704830.9867528%61722%428349%7846%

    CORE CITIES

    1994/982005

    Tyne and Wear0.560.35

    Greater Bristol0.470.43

    Greater Manchester0.510.43

    West Midlands0.810.44

    Merseyside0.560.48

    South Yorkshire0.570.51

    West Yorkshire0.710.52

    Greater Nottingham1.050.69

    Maintenance

    Highway Maintenance% of network requiring immediate attention

    LTP areaPrincipal roads(Scanner surveys)Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)Unclassified roads

    Derby19%28%8%cvi

    Leicester13%12%6%cvi

    Greater Nottingham7%10%11%scanner

    Greater Bristol8%14%10%?

    South Yorkshire8%18%10%?

    West Yorkshire10%23%16%cvi

    Merseyside15%20%18%?

    Tyne and Wear17%15%28%cvi

    Greater Manchester19%29%

    Birminghamn/an/a13%cvi

  • Comparative road safety performance in the core cities

    core cities public transport

    -0.12

    -0.11

    -0.08

    -0.04

    -0.03

    0.02

    0.02

    0.08

    % change from 2000

    core cities KSIs

    0.55678670360.35

    0.470.43

    0.51240.432

    0.8050.435

    0.56094276090.4767676768

    0.57276995310.5148669797

    0.70666666670.5166666667

    1.05238095240.6888888889

    - 9%

    - 16%

    - 46%

    - 15%

    - 10%

    - 27%

    - 35%

    (-9%) = % change

    - 37%

    1994/98

    2005

    KSIs per 1,000 resident population

    core cities road condition

    0.070.1

    0.080.136

    0.0810.175

    0.0960.229

    0.1460.198

    0.170.15

    0.1870.285

    Tyne and Wear figures apply to Newcastle only

    Principal roads(Scanner surveys)

    Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)

    Road condition where immediate works are required

    Core Cities Principal and Non-Principal Road Condition 2005/6

    pt patronage cha

    Public transport patronage

    % change

    Derby-13%

    South Yorkshire (125.2m)-12%

    West Midlands (312.5m)-11%

    Tyne and Wear (165.7m)-8%includes bus and metro

    Merseyside (162.9m)-4%includes bus and tram

    West Yorkshire (194.8m)-3%

    Greater Manchester (238.9m)2%includes bus and tram

    Leicester2%

    Greater Bristol (53.8m)2%

    Greater Nottingham (77.6m)8%includes bus and tram

    KSIs chart

    Road casualties

    Population2005 KSIs per 1,000 pop2005 KSIs94/98 KSIs per 1,000 pop1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 20002005 Child KSIs1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000

    Tyne and Wear1,083,0000.353780.5660337%43814%6714754%9630%

    Leicester City525,0000.291510.4423235%18317%184459%3244%

    Derby City285,0000.361020.5515735%1118%163148%2020%

    Greater Bristol1,000,0000.434300.474709%4617%436130%5420%

    Greater Manchester2,500,0000.4310800.51128116%11234%20530433%23613%

    West Midlands2,600,0000.441,1310.812,09346%1,59329%20941550%28527%

    Merseyside1,485,0000.487080.5683315%7647%14519726%1546%

    South Yorkshire1,278,0000.516580.5773210%6864%9515037%12222%

    West Yorkshire2,100,0000.5210850.71148427%129916%13327251%23042%

    Greater Nottingham630,0000.694341.0566335%58726%5611853%10647%

    Derbyshire690,0000.704830.9867528%61722%428349%7846%

    CORE CITIES

    1994/982005

    Tyne and Wear0.560.35

    Greater Bristol0.470.43

    Greater Manchester0.510.43

    West Midlands0.810.44

    Merseyside0.560.48

    South Yorkshire0.570.51

    West Yorkshire0.710.52

    Greater Nottingham1.050.69

    Maintenance

    Highway Maintenance% of network requiring immediate attention

    LTP areaPrincipal roads(Scanner surveys)Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)Unclassified roads

    Derby19%28%8%cvi

    Leicester13%12%6%cvi

    Greater Nottingham7%10%11%scanner

    Greater Bristol8%14%10%?

    South Yorkshire8%18%10%?

    West Yorkshire10%23%16%cvi

    Merseyside15%20%18%?

    Tyne and Wear17%15%28%cvi

    Greater Manchester19%29%

    Birminghamn/an/a13%cvi

  • Comparative child road safety performance in the core cities

    core cities public transport

    -0.12

    -0.11

    -0.08

    -0.04

    -0.03

    0.02

    0.02

    0.08

    % change from 2000

    Core Cities Public Transport Patronage & Growth Over LTP1 Period

    core cities KSIs

    0.55678670360.35

    0.470.43

    0.51240.432

    0.8050.435

    0.56094276090.4767676768

    0.57276995310.5148669797

    0.70666666670.5166666667

    1.05238095240.6888888889

    Based upon 2005 population estimates

    - 9%

    - 16%

    - 46%

    - 15%

    - 10%

    - 27%

    - 35%

    (-9%) = % change

    - 37%

    1994/98

    2005

    KSIs per 1,000 resident population

    Core Cities KSIs per 1,000 resident population

    core cities child KSIs

    0.74430379750.3392405063

    0.32795698920.2311827957

    0.59724950880.4027504912

    0.76342899190.3844738779

    0.75740099960.5574778931

    0.61025223760.3864930838

    0.63299976730.3095182686

    1.03146853150.4895104895

    - 54%

    - 30%

    - 33%

    - 50%

    - 26%

    - 37%

    - 51%

    - 53%

    (-54%) = % change

    1994/98

    2005

    Per 1,000 Child Population

    core cities road condition

    0.070.1

    0.080.136

    0.0810.175

    0.0960.229

    0.1460.198

    0.170.15

    0.1870.285

    Tyne and Wear figures apply to Newcastle only

    Principal roads(Scanner surveys)

    Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)

    Road condition where immediate works are required

    Core Cities Principal and Non-Principal Road Condition 2005/6

    pt patronage cha

    Public transport patronage

    % change

    Derby-13%

    South Yorkshire (125.2m)-12%

    West Midlands (312.5m)-11%

    Tyne and Wear (165.7m)-8%includes bus and metro

    Merseyside (162.9m)-4%includes bus and tram

    West Yorkshire (194.8m)-3%

    Greater Manchester (238.9m)2%includes bus and tram

    Leicester2%

    Greater Bristol (53.8m)2%

    Greater Nottingham (77.6m)8%includes bus and tram

    KSIs chart

    Road casualties

    Population2005 KSIs per 1,000 pop2005 KSIs94/98 KSIs per 1,000 pop1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000Child population2005 Child KSIs1994/98 ave.% change from 94/982000 figure% change from 2000

    Tyne and Wear1,083,0000.353780.5660337%43814%197,5006714754%9630%

    Leicester City525,0000.291510.4423235%18317%184459%3244%

    Derby City285,0000.361020.5515735%1118%163148%2020%

    Greater Bristol1,000,0000.434300.474709%4617%186,000436130%5420%

    Greater Manchester2,500,0000.4310800.51128116%11234%509,00020530433%23613%

    West Midlands2,600,0000.441,1310.812,09346%1,59329%543,60020941550%28527%

    Merseyside1,485,0000.487080.5683315%7647%260,10014519726%1546%

    South Yorkshire1,278,0000.516580.5773210%6864%245,8009515037%12222%

    West Yorkshire2,100,0000.5210850.71148427%129916%429,70013327251%23042%

    Greater Nottingham630,0000.694341.0566335%58726%114,4005611853%10647%

    Derbyshire690,0000.704830.9867528%61722%428349%7846%

    CORE CITIESKSIsChild KSIs

    1994/9820051994/982005

    Tyne and Wear0.560.350.740.34

    Greater Bristol0.470.430.330.23

    Greater Manchester0.510.430.600.40

    West Midlands0.810.440.760.38

    Merseyside0.560.480.760.56

    South Yorkshire0.570.510.610.39

    West Yorkshire0.710.520.630.31

    Greater Nottingham1.050.691.030.49

    Maintenance

    Highway Maintenance% of network requiring immediate attention

    LTP areaPrincipal roads(Scanner surveys)Non-principal roads(Scanner surveys)Unclassified roads

    Derby19%28%8%cvi

    Leicester13%12%6%cvi

    Greater Nottingham7%10%11%scanner

    Greater Bristol8%14%10%?

    South Yorkshire8%18%10%?

    West Yorkshire10%23%16%cvi

    Merseyside15%20%18%?

    Tyne and Wear17%15%28%cvi

    Greater Manchester19%29%

    Birminghamn/an/a13%cvi

  • Greater Nottingham LTP1 Delivery ReportOverall impact satisfaction

    94% of tram users satisfiedOver 80% feel measures are effective79% are satisfied with bus services73% satisfied with informationA third cite it as the reason they are satisfied with Nottingham as a place to liveSource: MORI / Operator surveys

  • Greater Nottingham LTP1 Delivery ReportProgress towards targets core indicators

    AchievedOn Track Not on trackPrincipal road conditionBus passenger journeysCycling tripsNon-principal road conditionNumber of KSIsUnclassified road conditionChild KSIsRural accessibilityTram patronage

  • Greater Nottingham LTP1 Delivery ReportProgress towards targets local indicators

    AchievedAchievedNot achievedBus quality partnershipsVehicle kilometres travelledBus journey speedsPeak period flowsPeak period flows to the CCCar occupancyPeak period car speedsCommuter plans in placeJourneys to work by bikeCost of city centre parkingJourneys to work on footPopulation walking or cycling for 30 minutes each dayAir quality exceedencesGreenhouse gas emissionsModal share of PT in peakModal share of PT (all)Retail vitalityNumber of bus sheltersPark and ride provisionBrownfield developmentSkylink patronageEasy access buses

  • The Transport Strategy for Nottingham is marketed to the public under the Big Wheel brandingThe Big Wheel

  • The Accolades

  • Transport Local Authorityof the Year 2002-3

  • Future Vision

  • Smarter ChoicesPredict and manageInfluencing Travel BehaviourWorkplace Travel PlansSchool Travel PlansTelecommutingHome ShoppingInternet retailingTravel Awareness CampaignsInformation and marketing

  • Whats new: Accessibility planning

  • Funding the new NET lines

  • How do we pay for it?

  • Transport Innovation Fund (TIF)6 CsInvestigating charging options across region1.8m Supporting Smarter Choices

  • Still to seek full member approvalPart of a cocktail of funding options availableCity Council area schemeSet to be first scheme in the UK (by scale)Improve public transport and reduce congestionProposed levy on city based employers (approx 500)384 per space per year (provisional)Employers will have option to pay levy or pass on to staffExemptions will apply e.g. small businesses & healthProceeds to be ring fenced for transport improvementsWPL proposed to start no earlier than 2009/10Approx 34,000 liable spaces

    Workplace Parking Levy

  • The Alternatives?Road User Charging Scheme (RUC)?Similar to London schemeEverybody gets charged via num platesPeak timed

    Do nothing?Cope with current fund allocationAlternative funding optionsWatch the city grind to a halt?

  • The Debate

  • The Debate!BusinessesLarge employersVisitorsMotoristsDevelopersInward investorsRiskPolitical acceptancePublic support

    1. Pro WPL2. Pro RUCLocal authoritiesPublic sectorNon motoristsSMEsEmergency servicesUnionsFreight co.Others

    xAgainst other options3. The 3rd Way?Business ratesCouncil TaxUse on buses not tramsDo nothingEffect on retailImpact on tourismInward investment

    Against other optionsAgainst other options