rpf task group feedback lab accreditation tg skills development tg 11/12 may 2005
TRANSCRIPT
RPF Task Group RPF Task Group FeedbackFeedback
Lab Accreditation TGLab Accreditation TGSkills Development TGSkills Development TG
11/12 May 200511/12 May 2005
BackgroundBackground
Task group formed to look at Lab Task group formed to look at Lab AccreditationAccreditation
Shortfall in accreditation process - lack Shortfall in accreditation process - lack of a proficiency scheme to ISO 43of a proficiency scheme to ISO 43
Proposal developed for a National Proposal developed for a National Proficiency SchemeProficiency Scheme
Stakeholder workshop to discuss Stakeholder workshop to discuss proposal (Feb ‘04)proposal (Feb ‘04)
Pilot study (2004/05)Pilot study (2004/05)– WCPAWCPA– GautransGautrans
Feedback of results (Feb ‘05)Feedback of results (Feb ‘05)
Laboratory Proficiency Laboratory Proficiency Workshop – 11 Feb Workshop – 11 Feb 20042004 Strong industry representation the Strong industry representation the
would act as the coordinating body would act as the coordinating body (NPASR)(NPASR)
All in favour of a national proficiency All in favour of a national proficiency schemescheme– Problem with reference labsProblem with reference labs– Needed to be cost-effectiveNeeded to be cost-effective
All accepted a pilot study to be run by All accepted a pilot study to be run by Gautrans and Western CapeGautrans and Western Cape
3 tests to be investigated3 tests to be investigated– Atterberg limitsAtterberg limits– Bitumen penetrationBitumen penetration– Sieve analysis Sieve analysis
Feedback from Pilot Feedback from Pilot StudyStudy
February 2005February 2005
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASR
Projects for 2004:
Particle Size Distribution (gradation)TMH-1 method A1(a)
National Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Plasticity Index (Atterberg)TMH-1 method A2TMH-1 method A3
Penetration of 80/100 pen. bitumen.ASTM D5-1997.
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 001
Assigned value: 15 (%) – Consensus value (expert)
Source: Controlled gradation made up.
Variability: %)Source: Typical (E-values)
Response: % Retained on 19,0 mm
z-Limit at C.L. 95% : X 4,1%)2z-Limit at C.L. 95% : X 8,2 (%)
GRADATION
19 mm sieve
Laboratory
% R
eta
ine
d (
ma
ss)
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2z
z
2z
z
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 001
GRADATION
% Retained on 19,0 mm
Mean values
Laboratory
% R
eta
ine
d o
n 1
9,0
mm
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 001
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 001
Outlier laboratory:
Property: % Retained on 19,0 mm (a) Analysis of variance F-value = 2,315 F-crit = 2,510 Result: Accept H0
(b) Tukey q(0.05,df(error)=18,k=9) = 4,96 (Tukey statistic) Result: No significant individual pair differences.
(c ) Dunnett q(0.05,df(error)=18,k=9) = 2,94 (Dunnett statistic) Result: No significant difference from control
GRADATION
4.75 mm sieve
Laboratory
% R
eta
ine
d (
ma
ss)
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2z
2z
z
z
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 001
GRADATION
0.425mm sieve
Laboratory
% R
etai
ned
(mas
s)
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
z
z
2z
2z
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 001
LIQUID LIMIT
Casagrande method
Laboratory
Liq
uid
Lim
it (%
)
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
z
z
2z
2z
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 002
PLASTIC LIMIT
Casagrande method
Laboratory
Pla
stic
Lim
it (%
)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
z
z
2z
2z
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 002
PLASTIC INDEX
Western Cape
Laboratory
Pla
stic
In
de
x (%
)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Casagrande
1 Point
2 Point
z
z
2z
2z
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 002
BITUMEN PENETRATION
80/100 pen. bitumen at 25 deg. C
Laboratory
Pe
ne
tra
tion
(0
.1 m
m)
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Set A
Set B
z
z
2z
2z
NPASRNPASRNPASRNPASRNational Proficiency Assessment Services for Roads
Service provider: P.A.W.C. PTP 2004 / 003
Agreements from the Agreements from the meetingmeeting Gautrans to feedback their results to Gautrans to feedback their results to
the participating laboratoriesthe participating laboratories Scheme to be structured in line with Scheme to be structured in line with
ISO 43 (formal process not a round ISO 43 (formal process not a round robin process)robin process)
Scheme should be coordinated Scheme should be coordinated nationally and run regionallynationally and run regionally
Scheme should be self-supporting and Scheme should be self-supporting and run on a cost-recovery basis.run on a cost-recovery basis.
Initial funding to kick-start the Initial funding to kick-start the processprocess
Executive Board of potential funders Executive Board of potential funders identified to move the process forwardidentified to move the process forward
Executive BoardExecutive Board
SANRALSANRAL K vd Walt/W WeberK vd Walt/W Weber WCPAWCPA M HendersonM Henderson GautransGautrans C TaljaardC Taljaard C & CIC & CI B PerrieB Perrie SabitaSabita P MyburghP Myburgh Commercial LabsCommercial Labs T MilneT Milne Technical AdvisorTechnical Advisor B DumasB Dumas CoordinatorCoordinator L SampsonL Sampson
ActionsActions
J Venter (SAACEL regional Chair) to drive J Venter (SAACEL regional Chair) to drive process in KZN in association with KZN process in KZN in association with KZN DoT (K Ducasse)DoT (K Ducasse)
L Sampson and B Dumas to rework original L Sampson and B Dumas to rework original proposal with costs for establishing the proposal with costs for establishing the scheme and submit to Ex Co for discussionscheme and submit to Ex Co for discussion
Ex Co to be organised before May RPFEx Co to be organised before May RPF All members of (NPASR) to be kept All members of (NPASR) to be kept
informed of progress by Ex Coinformed of progress by Ex Co Next three testsNext three tests
– MDD/OMC using Mod AASHTOMDD/OMC using Mod AASHTO– Marshall stability and flow for asphalt mixesMarshall stability and flow for asphalt mixes– ALD for aggregatesALD for aggregates
Skills DevelopmentSkills Development
StatusStatus
National Certificate in the supervision of National Certificate in the supervision of construction processes in place at NQF construction processes in place at NQF level 4level 4– Learning material being developedLearning material being developed– Implications to the industryImplications to the industry
National certificate in construction National certificate in construction materials manufacturing (NQF 2 – 6)materials manufacturing (NQF 2 – 6)– under developmentunder development
National certificate in Materials Testing National certificate in Materials Testing under development (NQF 2 – 7)under development (NQF 2 – 7)– On hold pending a new workshop to rethink On hold pending a new workshop to rethink
the qualification structurethe qualification structure