rpms for mt
DESCRIPTION
Results-Based Performance Management System is required in public school so teachers will have an idea on how they are going to grade themselves according to their own set targets.TRANSCRIPT
Name of employee:
AIDA C. LITARGOPosition:
MT-IReview Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:BAYOG ELEMENTARY SCHOOLName of Rater:
MARICAR A. AFUANGPosition:
OIC- Principal IDate of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESOUTPUTWeight per KRATIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)ACTUAL RESULTSRATING SCORE*
A. Professional Growth and Development
B. Instructional Competence
C. Instructional Supervision
1. Conducted at least one action research related to school or classroom concerned every year.2. Participated in seminars, workshop training for teachers within a year.
3. Participated in co- curricular/ school activities such as teachers association, Alay Lakad, Teachers Day, Dep-Ed Night, Brigada within a year.1. Carried regular teaching load for the designed grade level.
2. Prepared lesson plans and visual aids related to the lesson.
3. Achieved above 75 % of the end of the school year.1. Checks regularly lesson plans of teachers in the assigned grade/ subject area. 2. Assist the school selection committee in the evaluation of credentials when hiring new teachers.3. Helped in the evaluation of teachers performance within a year.Action Research
Seminar/
workshops/
trainings
ParticipationTeaching Load
Lesson plans
Annual pupils performance
Accomplished monitoring form
Submitted credentials of applicants15%
15%
10%
5%
10%
5%
10%
15%
15%July 2014
to
March
2015
July 2014
to
March
2015July 2014
to
March
2015
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assignedOVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Name of employee:
MICHELLE A. ATANACIOPosition:
MT-IReview Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:LOPEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOLName of Rater:
LUCIA F. PAGALANAN, Ed.D.Position:
Principal IIIDate of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESOUTPUTWeight per KRATIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)ACTUAL RESULTSRATING SCORE*
D. Professional Growth and Development
E. Instructional Competence
F. Instructional Supervision4. Conducted at least one action plan research every year
5. Participated in district/division seminar//workshop within a year
6. Served as facilitator/trainer in INSET done within a year.
4. Carried regular teaching load for the designed grade level.
5. Initiated improvement of the pupils performance thru formative tests, weekly/unit tests, quizzes of at least __ % every quarter.
6. Helped increase NAT result by __% by using different interventions.
4. Performed __% class monitoring of teachers by observing/checking lesson plans once a week.
5. Provided technical assistance/coaching activities to at least __ teachers every quarter
6. Helped in the evaluation of teachers performance within a year. Action Research
Seminar/
workshops/
trainings
Teaching Load
Annual student
performance
NAT
Performance
Accomplished Monitoring Form
Documented
coaching
activities 15%
15%
10%
5%
10%
5%
10%
15%
15%July 2014
to
March
2015
July 2014
to
March
2015
July 2014
to
March
2015
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assignedOVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Name of employee:
TESSIE E. RAMILOPosition:
MT-IReview Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:LOPEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOLName of Rater:
LUCIA F. PAGALANAN, Ed.D.Position:
Principal IIIDate of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESOUTPUTWeight per KRATIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)ACTUAL RESULTSRATING SCORE*
a. Professional Growth and Development
b. Instructional Competence
c. Instructional Supervision1. Conducted at least one action plan research every year
2. Participated in district/division seminar//workshop within a year
3. Served as facilitator/trainer in INSET done within a year.
4. Carried regular teaching load for the designed grade level.
5. Initiated improvement of the pupils performance thru formative tests, weekly/unit tests, quizzes of at least __ % every quarter.
6. Helped increase NAT result by __% by using different interventions.
7. Performed __% class monitoring of teachers by observing/checking lesson plans once a week.
8. Provided technical assistance/coaching activities to at least __ teachers every quarter
9. Helped in the evaluation of teachers performance within a year. Action Research
Seminar/
workshops/
trainings
Teaching Load
Annual student
performance
NAT
Performance
Accomplished Monitoring Form
Documented
coaching
activities 15%
15%
10%
5%
10%
5%
10%
15%
15%July 2014
to
March
2015
July 2014
to
March
2015
July 2014
to
March
2015
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assignedOVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Name of employee:
ELLEN B. ANCAJASPosition:
MT-IReview Period:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:LOPEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOLName of Rater:
LUCIA F. PAGALANAN, Ed.D.Position:
Principal IIIDate of Review:
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESOUTPUTWeight per KRATIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)ACTUAL RESULTSRATING SCORE*
a. Professional Growth and Development
b. Instructional Competence
c. Instructional Supervision1. Conducted at least one action plan research every year
2. Participated in district/division seminar//workshop within a year
3. Served as facilitator/trainer in INSET done within a year.
4. Carried regular teaching load for the designed grade level.
5. Initiated improvement of the pupils performance thru formative tests, weekly/unit tests, quizzes of at least __ % every quarter.
6. Helped increase NAT result by __% by using different interventions.
7. Performed __% class monitoring of teachers by observing/checking lesson plans once a week.
8. Provided technical assistance/coaching activities to at least __ teachers every quarter
9. Helped in the evaluation of teachers performance within a year. Action Research
Seminar/
workshops/
trainings
Teaching Load
Annual student
performance
NAT
Performance
Accomplished Monitoring Form
Documented
coaching
activities 15%
15%
10%
5%
10%
5%
10%
15%
15%July 2014
to
March
2015
July 2014
to
March
2015
July 2014
to
March
2015
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assignedOVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Individual Performance Commitment Form
MARICAR A. AFUANG
Rater
AIDA C. LITARGO
Ratee
Individual Performance Commitment Form
Individual Performance Commitment Form
TESSIE E. RAMILO
Ratee
LUCIA F. PAGALANAN, Ed.D.
Rater
Individual Performance Commitment Form
ELLEN B. ANCAJAS
Ratee
LUCIA F. PAGALANAN, Ed.D.
Rater
MICHELLE A. ATANACIO
Ratee
LUCIA F. PAGALANAN, Ed.D.
Rater
MICHELLE A. ATANACIO
Ratee
LUCIA F. PAGALANAN, Ed.D.
Rater