8. 1.S55 CHESTER 010

RECEIVED

MOV 2 O

MINING LANDS SECTION

CONSOLIDATED SILVER BUTTE MINES LTD.

REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL, GEOCHEMICAL AND VLF-EM

SURVEYS, CLAIMS P-537233 AND P-622048 TO 622050

CHESTER TWP., PORCUPINE M.D., ONTARIO.

BY: J. BANKOWSKI, BSc.

NOVEMBER, 198?

TABLE OF C

PAGE41P12SW0055 2.18555 CHESTER 010C

1 ......................... INTRODUCTION

1 ......................... LOCATION AND ACCESS

1 ......................... REGIONAL GEOLOGY

2 ......................... LOCATION MAP

3 ......................... CLAIM GEOLOGY

k . . . . . ... . .. . . . . .... . . . .. GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

5 . ........................ VLF-EM SURVEY

6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... CERTIFICATE

APPENDIX

8 . . . . . . . .. .. . . .... . . . . . .. . .ASSAY CERTIFICATE

9 . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ..

10 ....,....... ............ "

11 ......................... "

FIGURE 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... .... GEOLOGY MAP

FIGURE 2 ......................... GEOCHEMISTRY MAP

FIGURE 3 ......................... VLF-EM MAP

p. 1

INTRODUCTION

A program of geological mapping, geochemical sampling and

VLF-EM surveying was conducted on claims 537233 and 622048 to

050 by J. Bankowski, C. Black and p. Stewart from Aug. 27 to Sept.

6, 1987.

The work was carried out on a grid with 400-foot line spaci-

ngs and stations every 100 feet along the lines. A total of 79

soil samples and 10 rock-chip samples were obtained and submitted

to Bell-White Labs of Haileybury for analysis.

The four subject claims and two contiguous claims to the

east compose the 6-claim "South Group" which is currently in good

standing and are registered to Cons. Silver Butte Mines Ltd. of

Vancouver.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The claims are located in the SE-J- of the NW-J- of the SE-jj- of

Chester Twp. and are located about mid-way between the cities of

Sudbury and Timmins along Hwy. 144 (Location Map, P.2).

Access to the claims is via a recently constructed lumber

road and then 1OOO feet east by canoe accross lower Duck Lake.

REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The area is underlain entirely by late Archean intrusive

rocks belonging to the "Granodiorite Clan" classification. Region

ally, this large intrusive complex ranges from mafic diorite-gra-

nodiorite to acidic alaskite-trondhejemite phases and is migma-

titic with abundant xenoliths of Archean volcanic rocks which

range from "fresh" and relatively unaltered to completely diges

ted.

The area has been mapped (Siragusa, P,2449, 1980) and this

is the best referrence map available.

Three prominent sets of structure are present in the area.

The most prominent set are a series of faults paralelling the

Lake Mesomikenda fault at about 150 to 170 0 Az.. These stuctures

are often intruded by diabase dikes.

'3* 3M

2 M

47372S 473724J4737234737271473726

473732 473731 I47S730I473729I47372* 473705--j\-.———4,———U.————J-.-—4-.-——l-.---!———.

47J737 l 473736——— " ——

3M

TOWNSHIP Hanker

CHESTER G-3223SCALE: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS

FEETO 1000 3000 4000 •000

O 200METRES

1000U KM)

2000(2 KM)

CLAIM LO CAT l OM

P.3

REGIONAL GEOLOGY f CON'T)

The next most prominent set of structure are a series of

shears trending at 90 to 120 0 Az . and it is this set of shears

that commonly hosts gold mineralization in the area especially

at the intersection of the faults at 150 to 1?0 0 Az. and the

above-mentiones shears.

The third set consists of a series of faults trending at

about 45 0 Az. and sometimes filled by large quartz-diabase,dikes.

The gold occurrence on claim 537233 trends at 72 0 Az. and

is the most southerly of the known occurrences in the area.

CLAIM GEOLOGY

Three distinct rock-types ranging from mafic to acidic com

position were noted while mapping the claims.(Figure 1).

v:i The mafic component cosists of fine to medium-grained dio

rite locally with a relatively-high silica content. This rock

ranges from dark green to medium green in colour, is quite dense

and tends to be slightly magnetic due to magnetite. Typically,

this rock has a fine-grained matrix with medium-grained, mafic

minerals. Locally, the diorite is silica altered with variable

development of sub to euhedral blue quartz "eyes" and significant

development of epidote. Sulphide content is generally less than

1^ but was noted up to 20^ in a shear at L^E-20S.

Diorite is the most abundant type noted and forms about 50^

of the mapped area.

Granodiorite is medium to coarse-grained with a "salt and

pepper" texture of dark mafics and light coloured feldspars.

Biotite and epidote enrichment occur locally as does development

of blue quartz "eyes". This is the least common rock mapped and

comprises about 15^ of the area.

Pink and white granite are the most acidic rocks noted and

comprises the remaining 35^ of the area. The pink granites have

a higher orthoclase content than the white type wlaich has more

albite. This rock is coarse-grained and massive and is locally

biotite and epidote enriched and also quartz altered locally with

up to 6O^ blue quartz "eyes" noted.

P.4

CLAIM GEOLOGY (CON'T.)

This rock-type hosts the gold occurrence at L16E-13S where a

fissure vein of quartz about 2 feet wide has been traced for 325

feet to the east at a bearing of 72 0 Az.. A total of 1062.6 feet

was drilled in 15 shallow drill holes from 1979 to 1983 with the

best intersection being 0.262 oz. Au/T obtained over 6 feet. A

grab sample of better mineralization by the author in 1986 gave

a value of 1.24 oz. Au/T.

Overburden on the claims is generally thin at about 5-10

feet but is quite extensive and coupled with heavy deadfall and

thick organics, rock exposure is poor.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

A total of 79 soil samples and 10 rock-chip samples were

obtained and submitted for assay {Figures 1 fa 2 ).

The results of the soils was plotted and contoured at 10

ppb Au intervals (Figure 2).

Background appears to be about 5 ppm Au with a maximum value

obtained of 44 ppb.

Three areas of anomalous gold concentration were noted and

designated "A","B" & " C" in decreasing order of magnitude as fol

lows :

"A" - located at L4E-3S to L12E-1S forms a linear 800 feet

long at a bearing of 77 0 Az. with a maximum value of 41 ppb Au.

"B" - located at L8E-12S to L12E-11S forms a 400 foot linear

at about 75 0 Az. and with a maximum value of 44 ppb Au.

"C" - located at L4E-16S to L8E-16S forms a 4OO foot linear

at about 90 0 Az. with a maximum value of 28 ppb Au.

All three anomalous areas are on the west claims while the

east claims appear to be "flat". Sampling on the east claims how

ever was very limited due to abundant swamp and water and this

would probably account for the lack of anomalies.

The highest assay for the 10 rock chip samples was 754 ppb

Au and was obtained from sheared diorite at L4E-20S.

P.5

VLF-EM SURVEY

The VLF-EM survey outlined a total of 4 conductors which in

decending magnitude are (Figure 3):

Conductor 1 - located at L12E-2S to L24E-8S at a bearing of

114 0 AZ. This is a strong conductor with maximum and minimum val

ues of *63^ and -7^/6 and is known to extend eastward for at least

600 feet from a previous EM survey of the claims to the east giv

ing the conductor a total length of at least 2200 feet. The ent

ire surface trace of the conductor is in low swamp and water but

would appear to be too strong to be caused by fluid channeling

or organic causes and most likely is related to a concentration

of sulphide.

Conductor 2 - located at L16E-15+50S at a similar bearing as

Conductor 1. This is also a strong conductor with maximum and

minimum values of +k8% and -37^* The author traced the conductor

2OO feet east and 100 west to a lake so the length is at least

300 feet and likely continues to the east in the lake. Again,

the conductor appears to be too strong to be explained by fluid

channeling or organics and appears to be related to sulphide.

Conductor 3 - located at L8E-13S is a weak conductor of -t-3%

and -17/6. The conductor is in low groundand may be caused by or

ganics but is roughly on strike with Conductor 2 and is co-inci

dent with geochemical anomaly "B" and therefor is interesting.

Conductor 4 - located in lake. Values of *4l^ and -25^ were

obtained 760 feet apart from opposite ends of a small bay. Again,

this conductor is too strong to be fluids or organics.

P.6

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Geologically, this is a very interesting, complex setting

which has high potential for the discovery of high-grade gold

mineralization as on claim 537233 where a grab sample taken by

the author in 1986, gave a value of 1.24 oz. Au/T.

Two of the geochemical anomalies trend at about 75 0 Az, wh

ich is roughly parallel to the gold-bearing vein on claim 537233

and may be caused by similar mineralization.

A strong, 2200+ foot long conductor l appears to be associated

with geochemical anomaly "A" at the north portion of the claim

group and this geochemical anomaly should be closely examined on

the ground as should anomalies "B" A "C".

The cause of the VLF-EM conductors can be resolved only by

drilling as all conductors are in swamp or water. A similar con

ductor about -5- mile north of the subject claims on claims regis

tered to Murgold Resources Inc. has had a grid and VLF surveying

conducted on it and is to be drilled in Jan.-Feb, 1988. If the

results of this drilling prove encouraging, drilling is recomm

ended on the conductors on the subject claims. Detailed VLF shou

ld be conducted prior to any drilling on the claims and should

be done in Jan.-Feb, 1988.

Respectfully submitted

J. Bankowski, BSc.(geol.)

November 18, 1987.

P. 7

CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph H. Bankowski, do hereby certify:

1 - that I am an exploration geologist residing at

88 Edgedale Dr. N.W., Calgary, Alberta j

2 - that I am a graduate of the University of Western

Ontario, 1980 with a B.Se. (Geology) and a graduate

of Cambrian College, Sudbury, Ontario, 1972 (Geol. Tech.) ;

3 - that I have been engaged in the practice of my

profession since graduating ;

k - that I have no interest, direct or indirect, nor do I

expect to receive any such interest in the properties

or securities of Consolidated Silver Butte Mines Ltd.

Joseph H. Bankowski

Geologist (B.Se.)

y /d^WaXx November 18, 1987.

APPENDIX

BELL-WniTE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD-.P. 8

P.O. BOX 187 HAILEYBURY. ONTARIO

nf AnalgatBTEL: 672-31O7

NO. 3535 DATE: October 27, 1987

SAMPLE(S) OF:

SAMPLE (S) F ROM:

Rock (10) RECEIVED: October 1987

Mr. J. Bankowski, CALGARY, Alberta

Sample No

SC-123456789

SC-10

Gold ppb

814241217273610

754**43

Checked

v, TM t os j-CST*BLK-HCO NOWT-l.-•..r,'. -T i, t^CCl'-iCALL" STATED

•v '-T B-: L. ,'i H ^ ALCf S PfPORTfD ON- '-CT FIT. F N *D : .. i'-Tr. P TO CO^-'TN-A '. r* j* \V N**fHt,sr I N T Ht f 1KC

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.P. 9

P O. BOX 187 HAILEYBURY. ONTARIO TEL: 672-31O7

NO. 3527

Qkrttfirai? nf AnalystsPage l of 3

DATE: October 27, 1987

SAMPLE(S) OF:

SAMPLE (S) F ROM:

Soils (79) RECEIVED: O ctober 1987

Mr. J. Bankowski, CALGARY, Alberta

Samp 1 e Ident if i cation

S. C LOE L4E

L8E -

IS3S5S14+40S15S16517S18S19S20S21S

2 + 15S3S4S5S7S8S9S10Sns12S 14S 15S

Au ppb

104

183866

1022101612151016341088

108868

4448

222,2.2,2

Ag pptn

NO 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0. 0. 0. O, 0. 0. NO NO NO 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 O, O 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4

22

NOTE: NO denotes not detected.

OT - rTHT. . L SATE

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.

v*u r-i RJ^ORTKD ON. *r?. ., : -T C C TO it O ^ PEN-

, S M t r* L N T IN T H t F l H E

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD,P. 10

P.O. BOX 187,

NO. 3527

SAMPLEi S) OF:

SAMPLE(S) F ROM:

HAILEYBURY. ONTARIO

nf AnaUjfltBPage 2 of 3

TEL: 672-3107

Soils (79)

Mr. J. Bankowski, CALGARY, Alberta

DATE: October 27, 1987

RECEIVED: October 1987

Sample Identification

L8E -

L12E -

165 175 185 21S 22+92S

L16E -

S 2S4S6S758595105US12514516517S21522523524S25526525

Au ppb

284

1087

19 41**7

1043

1185

1575l337232

10

l

24

Ag ppm

NO 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.4 O, O, 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4

O 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.6NO 0.2

NO denotes not detected. ** Checked

THE:S -'. T L

|, p ^ N O " T H .Ai.i.v ' - T AT t D ^^1 OWTCO ONTO c o M P r N .

. *, THE r l H E

BELL-WHITE A NALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.P.O. BOX 187, HAILEYBURY. ONTARIO TEL: 672-31O7

(Hrritfirat* of Attalgatfi3527

SAMPLE(S) OF:

Page 3 of 3

Soils (79)

DATE:

RECEIVED:

October 27, 1987

October 1987

FROM: M r . j. Bankowski, CALGARY, Alberta

Samp l e Identification

L16E - 6S- US- 17S- 20S- 21S- 22S- 23S- 23+41S

L20E - IN

L24E -

S 2S3S 4S 7S 23+405IN

S2S 3S 5S 7S8 + 50S 10Sns

Au ppb

54523333242232323323282332

26,2

Ag ppm

0.6 0.6 0.6 O, O, 0. 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6 ND 0.8 0.4 O, O, O, 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.2

6,4 6

NOTE: ND denotes not detected.

A V t " ' A '.

O*-r",-.,, r .C T' -t . l : — * - T l tt.-.-- f C s LOi-.-

;--' ' - ...r-: T i IPCC'I'ICAI-LV S TATED.S A \D i ll VI" VALUES R f.POBTEO ON•i.'E SOT D CF.V A CVJfTEO T O COMPEN.,; i'.L' .-..' St -.'-CHtSr IN TMt t.UK

BELL-WHITE ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD.

December 10, 1987

41P12SWa85S 2.18555 CHESTER 900

235/87 Our File: 2.10555

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Notice of Intent dated November 25, 1987Geological and Geochemical Survey on Mining Claims P 537233 et al 1n Chester Township -

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

W.R. Cowan, Manager Mining Lands Section Mines and Minerals Division

Whitney Block, Room 6610 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Telephone: (416) 965-4888

DK:plEnclosure: Technical Assessment Work Credits

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining fi Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

Consolidated Silver Butte Mines Ltd.Suite 906837 W. Hastings StreetVancouver, B.C.V6C 1B6

Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern DevelopmentaogLMines

Ontario

Technical Assessment Work Credits

Date

November 25, 1987

File

2.10555Mining Reeorder't Report ofwork *10 ' 235/87

Recorded Holder

Consolidated Silver Butte Mines Ltd.Township or Area

ChesterType of survey and number of

Assessment days credit per claimGeophysical

Magnetometer . days

Inrlureri polarization . rlayt

Other , rlays

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological Hays

20Reorhemipfll rtayi

Man days Q Airborne CD

Special provision ("^ Ground fX]

i l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

l l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

P-537233 622048

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

10 days Geochemical

P - 622049-50

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

Q not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above crediu if necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) -60.

1 Ministry of Northern Development

Technical Assessment Work Credits

Ontario DateNovember 25, 1987

File

2.10555Mining Recorder's Report of Workfco. 235/87

Recorded HolderConsolidated Silver Butte Mines Ltd.

Townthlp Kift&XX

Chester

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

GeophysicalPlcrtrnmsgnptir Hays

M*gnetnrru?t?r . , , ,. . rlays

)nrinr*H pnlarjratinn rlayi

Other rtays

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

40 Geological riays

Gporhemirial rtays

Man days l l Airborne f~l

Special provision [x] Ground 0

Q Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

P-537233 622050

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

30 Days GeologicalP-622048-49

Mo credits have been allowed for the following mining claimsQ not sufficiently covered by the survey Q insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print, f^ V . f l— If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of S urvoy(s)

Claim Holder(s)

Township o r Area nw.Prospector's Licence No.

/V 2/ 777

#306-03? /^ /Survey Company

J-i

/?/ (6c?o/-)

\C. t j/6'C

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

i #6 -

Date of Survey (from St to)2.7 06 ff7\ 06 09 P~7

Day j Mo. | Yr. | Day | Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

MW. }Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse sitjswl ^ and enter ou*(sChVe

*iC v,^0^'

*C V^*#flfrAirborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysicalct/f^eody A?S ^^

- E lectfomagnetic 1/Jitf*', yeopty.

- Magnetometecfy/rAof'te)

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Feophysical

- Electromagnetic

T - Magnetometer

- RadJbmetric

c^C^^t^Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

"Via-

4ogo

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Expenditures .(exsjijcj^i goyyej^stripping)T^AA k*-vO n^ty toAWkSiit&i'^'Wi 1* —i—^-^——

on Claimtty——SEP-2JMtW

Calculation of Expenditure Days Ct idits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

Is LLInstructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected n columns (it right.

Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)^/-^^AC^/Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

P

—,—,-.,,

j?**';'.'''--*1

Number

5-3 7233621048622.04362-3. OSO

Expend. Days Cr.

- ——

gss&Q.

g®

F E

i

Mining ClaimPrefix

i -

;:.w..

i:. A... •/s"" l -

\- ''""S *

;CO

EP l

Number

-

R D E D 1

L 1987

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Expend. Days Cr.

r

4-For Office Use Only

Total Days Cr. Date Recorded Recorded

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifyingli' -

Date Certified Certified by

1362 (81/9)

November 12* 1987 Report of Worki 235/B7

Consolidated Silver Butte Nines Ltd. #906 - 837 W. Hastings St. Vancouver, B.C. V6C 186

Dear Sirs;

RE: Mining Claims P-537233 et al In the Township of Chester

We have not received the reports and maps (1n duplicate) for the Geological and Geochemical Surveys on the above-mentioned claims.

As the assessment "Report of Work" was recorded by the Mining Recorder on September 22, 1987 the 60 day period allowed by Section 77 of the Mining Act for the submission of the technical reports and maps to this office will expire on November 21, 1987.

If the material 1s not submitted to this office by November 23, 1987, we will have no alternative but to Instruct the Mining Recorder to delete the work credits from the claim record sheets.

For further Information, please contact Mr. Dennis Klnvlg at (416) 965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

W. R. Cowan, Manager Mining Lands Section Mines and Minerals Division

Whitney Block, Room 6610 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Enclosure: Report of Work

cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

Mr. J, Bankowskl 68 Edgedale Dr. N.W. Calgary, Alberta T3A 2R4

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Geophyslcal-Geologlcal-Geochemlcal Technical Data Statement

Flle_

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

lW

Type of rTownship or AreaClaim HnlHer(s) ( a Si Z,

/yt*S-/-**/- 7~uJ0

J?" f

.A

J*Survey Company.- Author of Report. Address of Author.

*s

Covering Dates of Survey S Cpf' - "3- 7' (linecutting to office)si

Total Miles of Line Cut.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer^.—Radiometric———Other—————.

DAYS per claim

Geological — Geochemical—^^.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provUion crediu do not apply to airborne turveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

nATF.r A/ni/. /37f?7 SIGNATURE:—^.^Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED Lilt numerically

(number)

•M

i

TOTAL CLAIMS.

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations————————————————————————.Number of Readings Station interval————————————————————————————.Line spacing————Profile scale_______________________————————————.———.Contour interval.

ZO

Qm*

Coil configurationUN-*

li

C Coil senaration _________/V/Y<

Instrument.Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

Instrument /^V^/7 /gr r ^F/V" /^

Accuracy ———————————————————————————————————————————————————____—— Method: D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back D In line O Parallel lineB

U3 J M

Parameters measured.

Instrument

{specify V.L.F. station)^•^WV4* J T I*J** * W**iVll*H^ ,

teer /1/44 ^/*r,/r?0sie, Z-f-e/c&z,

Scale constantCorrections made.

O Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ————Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time ——————————————————————————— Frequency —————

-Off time__________________________ Range ———————— Delay time —.——————————————————————— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing. Type of electrode ,

SELF POTENTIALInstrument————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method —————————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument———Values measured.Energy windows (levels)_______________________________________. Height of instrument___________________________Background Count . Size of detector.—-—————-.^———^—.—.—..———^——.^-——...—.-........——.Overburden ———-———---———————-—^—....———.^——.^^^—.—-——————.

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey——————————————————————— Instrument —————————————————————————Accuracy.———————^——————^^-——————.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy————^————..-^—.^—

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used-——-——————————^——-^-—.———.-—...——.

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight

Method of Collection

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

Cu, Pb, Zn,

Others____

Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -————^——

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, icreening, crushing, athing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used __

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used————

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

GeneraL General.

REFERENCE S

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY

S.R.O.-SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

M.+ S.-MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS -

Description Order No. Data Disposition Fil*

s

SEC- 36/80 "9/2/80 S.B.O. 171509

SAND AND GRAVEL

C) QUARRY PERMIT

J t J M. T C. PIT Mo. 1349

M T.C. GRAVEL PIT Ma. 1649

'3) M T. C. CRAVCL PIT No I3B5

NOTES

FLOODING BIGHTS TO CONTOUR I2OO* RESERVED TO

OUT. HYDRO. LOG. MT 36, L.O. 7543. f tLL I O621

CL I-

OUJ

4IPiaSTO8SS 2.10555 CHESTER

5M - -

4 M

- } 'Wee luckS \m . .f W,

' . wv -^. L jw Ofry fcf\ \ LL^. ..

t5490i9 /5490I8 1,"

'.473715 '473714-473713

•P ; w IP j P

549(08 1473722 47J7ZI U7372O 1473719 1*73718 i[ 4737GIt ' ' l '"V i ** P

TT*T3**4 " ~3 M

473732 473731 147373014737231473728 473705

349111 '4737371473736 l 473733 !* 7373*^VTJ73J j 7*73703 ,

46997(546996; 545^95

549OOIi

964057 9*40341 9*4038

O. H

enUJ

UJ2: 2:UJCD

l M

INVERGARRY TP.

200

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS

SURVEYED LINES:TOWNSHIPS, BASELINES, ETC.LOTS, MINING CLAIM?. PARCELS, ETC.

UNSURVEYED LINES: . LOT LINES

PARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC,

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY

UTILITY LINES

NON-PERENNIAL STREAM

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN

RESERVATIONS

ORIGINAL SHORELINE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATENT. SURFACE fc MINING RIGHTS

" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLYM...

, MINING RIGHTS ONLY —M-.

LEASE, SURFACE 8. MINING RIGHTS..

" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.___

SYMBOL

e o

" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY.___........_...,.__. Q

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION .........____._.mm™. T

ORDER-IN-COUNC1L .,._____......_.__.........__ OC

RESERVATION ____....___..........._____..__. ©

CANCELLED ___..._____.....^.....___...--.. *

SAND ft GRAVEL ___....___,...____.__...__.. (J)

NOTE: M INING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY *. 1913. VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE HY THE PU8LIC LANDS ACT, R.S.O. 1370, CHAP. 390. S EC. 63. SUBSEC 1.

SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 CHAINS

FEETO lOOO 2OOO 4OOO ftOOO BOOO

O 200METRES

5OOO 1 KM)

2OOO (2 KM)

TOWNSHIP

CHESTERM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

GOGAMAMINING DIVISION

PORCUPINELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

SUDBURY

Ministryof LandNatural Management

Resources B ranchOntario

t/X- a/i .j y fa /m At,*niiii 6 : 2 7-*iT - s f {9/6/4 /* 09* eJic.

t O W Z A

QVCK

S 3 r 2 33

< s .^—V *fli*f--d'0'"

^c.e/.fi -' "fi to SOT* 44-Csf- Cameras f-au

622050

' *f '*''* Fr- o . ..' j 'iC e- D ff/t/u qtZ.

T-^. in M M& ' - J r t

CONSOLIDATED S/LVEA BUTTE M/NESLTD.

F l G.l ' GEOLQ6Y;ClAfMS /0-S37233 f 422O48-OSQla ~ d tones', -f-inf to1&-

le- rcrti/e , so/nz

t dark -60 /a ed f V/H

f: 2.400too 2.00 3oo -400

41P12SW0055 2.10555 CHESTER210

Z SE M Q

//s ' no"A " ~ q

^4/A - a

j saif SQ/np/e and assay in ppb d- Aa tr, m a/so assayed 6vt no-6

Q&-SOU sjee* //i d/Qpertc/ix-' /O ppb

r a/a^tr or /Q^k o-f so f

D

Q ~ IQ

JO-2O

3- o -

' ne r a

CONSOLIDATED 5/LV&A BUTTE M l ME S LTD.

F l Q. 2 -GEOCHZM/SrAY; CtJ/rfS62 20 4s -OSO) z/ses re A r w ft. , PoA^vP/we M- o.,

seAte; f"- 7 :2400

. J. fiantc&sfcf}

41P12SW8055 2.10555 CHESTER eao

-2Z

-2.4s

L Z 6 2 fi/D

A/ A d 2 j. o AV/z.

~ a// /V @ so

CONSOLIDATED SILVER &UTTE MINC5 LTD.

F/6. J - VLF-EM SURvfY; CM/MS P-S37233

too 2.00F ter

41PI2S*ee55 2.10555 CHESTER 230

-245

l l O -f o

D *e -8at-10

- zf r a rt ivw- 't ''tzr A/AA Cf/6/er, ZJ.Q

DV "X 4- o r a* f S

A/

o/o

CONSOLIDATED &UTTE MING5 LTD.

F/6. T " VLF-EM SURVEY; CM/MS

Zoo 300 FEET

J.

41P12SWea55 2.10555 CHESTER