rpt on geol of pindar cl grp · the pindar claim group was staked for dickenson mines limited in...
TRANSCRIPT
52Na4SEeei82 2 .7616 BALMER TWP 010
GOLDQUEST EXPLORATION INC.
REPORT ON THE GEOLOGY OF THE PINDAR CLAIM GROUP
SOUTHERN PORTION
BALMER AND BATEMAN TOWNSHIPS
RED LAKE MIMING DI.VISI.ON
RED LAKE, ONTARIO
RECEIVED
^C 28 1984
MINING LANDS SECTION
OCTOBER 1983 BY: Stephen McGibbon
INTRODUCTION;
The Pindar Claim Group was staked for Dickenson Mines Limited in 1979.
The property adjoins an extensive area of patented and staked claims that
together make up part of the holdings of Goldquest Exploration Incorporated.
The present survey was conducted on twenty-one claims located at the
southeast corner of the group, and was primarily interested in mapping the
geology, as well as relocating old work (trenching, drilling) performed by
previous operators.
The claims are located fourteen kilometres northeast of the community
of Red Lake, and can be reached via a winter road branching off of Johnson Road,
which intersects Nungesser Road at a point 8.6 kilometres from highway 125.
(See Figure l).
This area is largely covered by swamp, muskeg, and glacial till, with
bedrock having about two percent surface exposure, and found almost exclusively
on the six most easterly claims.
PRESENT WORK;
Geology and VLF surveys were conducted concurrently by the author,
W. Wirowatz, and l. Spooner, during August, Setpember, and October 1983.
These surveys were performed by traversing 25 metre picket lines spaced 100
metres apart, and the data plotted at a scale of 1:2500.
Interpretation and evaluation of the VLF survey is not included in
this present study; two map sheets showing results of the geology survey are
appended.
Claims examined in the survey are listed in Table 1; not all are
part of the Pindar Claim Group.
[tOLDCHJEST EXPLORATION INC.
RED E AREA,ONTARIO
PROPERTY MAP
DISTRICT OF KENORA
SCALf ' I'7850O O i t
DUCHESNE—y————. BALARD l
COMMANDER
cDONOUGH TWP.
PRESENTMCDOUGALL
CAMPBELL RED LAKE MINES LTD.
DICKENSON MINES LTD.
TOWNSHIP CORNER' LOCATED TWELVE MILES,(19.J KU) CUE WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNE OF DOME TOWNSHIP
INSET SCALE-SAME
SOUTHEASTROWAN GROUP
KEG LAKE
fp'
TABLE
K.R.L. 22236
K.R.L. 22237
K.R.L. 222*12
K.R.L. 16903
K.R.L. 5095***l
K.R.L. 5095**5
K.R.L. 5095^6
K.R.L. 5095*17
K.R.L. 5095*48
K.R.L. 563850
K.R.L. 563851
K.R.L. 563852
K.R.L. 563853
K.R.L. 563854
K.R.L. 563939
K.R.L. 5639**0
K.R.L. 5639^1
K.R.L. 5639*12
K.R.L. 5639*13
K.R.L. 5639*1**
K.R.L. 5639**5
HISTORY OF PREVIOUS WORK;
No less than five operators have carried out work on portions of the
claim block covered by this survey.
O'Keefe Red Lake Mines, in 19^6, performed magnetic and geological
surveys over a group of 27 claims at the extreme northeast corner of Balmer
Township; two of which (5^39^2 and 5639^3) are held by Goldquest. The magnetic
survey, and subsequent drilling (three X-ray holes totalling 6^ m) helped to
define the greenstone-granite contact. No economic mineralization was intersected,
Also in 19^*6, Janet Red Lake Mines Limited carried out a magnetometer
survey and detailed surface examination over fifteen claims situated west of the
O'Keefe group. Their results indicated the property was underlain by rocks of
the Keewatin volcanic assemblage as well as a narrow band of sediments with iron
formation. Geological and geophysical evidence also suggested the presence of a
northeast trending fault zone eminating from the Clicker property to the south
and extending to a deep narrow embayment of volcanics in the Trout Lake Batholith
northwest of Walsh Lake.
In 195^, a block of 18 claims, covering a large part of the present
survey was optioned to New Dickenson Mines Limited by Charlie Peterson and
John Gomez. The work carried out consisted of a systematic channel sampling
program in a trench exposing predominantly copper mineralization in carbontized,
resilicified, sedimentary rock. Results indicated mineralization to be erratic,
and generally lacking in the exposed rock.
During 1957, Cordoba Mines Limited carried out a major drill program
over their holdings in Balmer, Bateman, and Ranger Townships. The drilling was
concentrated within four claims which just overlap the extreme southeast corner
of the Goldquest claims (KRL 5639^3) near Adam's Lake. The drill logs show the
geology to be mainly mafic volcanics with numerous narrow silicious bands con
taining variable amounts.of iron sulphides, magnetite, and graphite. Some
clastic sediments and felsic intrusives were also noted. The best assays returned
from dril l ing were:
2.76 ozs. Au/5.0 feet
0.17 ozs. Au/2.6 feet
0.06 ozs. AuA.8 feet
The southeast portion of the Pindar Claim Group is part of a large block
HISTORY OF PREVIOUS WORK: Cont'd
of claims staked for Dickenson Mines Limited between August 1979 and October 1981
Since then, linecutting, magnetometer, and horizontal loop surveys have been
conducted over the twenty-one claims comprising this study.
LOGY;
Regionally, the map area is located in the lower mafic sequence
{predominantly tholeiitic) of the Red Lake greenstone belt. Locally, the
geology consists of mafic metavolcanic sequences and metasedjraentary .strata.
intruded by rocks of felsic to mafic composition.
The mafic metavolcanic sequences consist of green to black, fine
grained pillow basalts and flows intercalated with minor mafic lapilli tuff.
These units are often chloritic, display variable degrees of biotite alteration,
and occasionally exhibit localized carbon! t ization, silicification, and
calcification. Homogeneous mafic flows are most commonly observed, however,
on weathered surfaces, light and dark flow bands can sometimes be discerned.
Pillow basalts are rarer and deformed so as to obscure stratigraphic tops.
Lapilli tuff is observed on two outcrops only. The unit appears banded and
contains less than five percent lap! 1 1 i -sized fragments.
Intercalated clastic and chemical metasedlmentary rocks are common
in the map area. The clastic unit, an argillite, is best identified by distinct
banding of laminae, strong folding, and differentially weathered outcrop surfaces.
Laminae bands and wisps are the only primary sedimentary structures observed.
Fine grained biotite, amphibole, and pyroxene, as well as medium to coarse -
grained, pink to red subhedral garnets are common in argillites on the eastern
boundary of the property, near the Balmer-Bateman township line. This mineral
ogy reflects the thermal metamorphic aureole of the Trout Lake batholith, and
represents a change from greenschist to amphibolite facies metamorphism.
The chemical metasedimentary units are represented by oxide and sulphide
facies iron formation. These are most often contained within the argillites, are
two metres (or less) in width, and are often covered by rust or yellow coloured
gossan. Common minerals within these horizons are finely to coarsely crystalline
pyrite, finely disseminated magnetite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite. Aresenopyr i te
is rare. Barrren chert horizons are often found adjacent to iron formation, and
may be an unmineral i zed sequence of the same unit.
The metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks are intruded by at least
two generations of felsic to mafic dykes (and sills?). The most extensive of
these is a series of massive to very well foliated gabbroic intrusives which
generally strike north-south across the eastern portion of the map area. Massive
varieties range from fine - to coarse - grained, and contain subhedral crystals of
pyroxene. Considerable alteration of pyroxene to hornblende and biotite is common.
GEOLOGY: Cont'd
Another late intrusive body, confined to an area just north of Adam's
Lake, contains phases ranging from gabbro to granodiorite. Although many phases
intermediate to these are observed, the rocks are inferred to represent separate
intrusive bodies. The gabbro is massive, medium - to coarse - grained, and
contains subhedral to euhedral hornblende phenocrysts in a groundmass composed
of quartz, anorthite, tourmaline, and sphene. The granodiorite is also massive,
medium - to coarse - grained, but contains hornblende and biotite phenocrysts in
a groundmass of quartz, alkali feldspar, and plagioclase. Inclusions of a fine
- grained mafic rock, varying in size from 0.5 cm to 15 cm, are found within
the granodiorite. Rock similar to the granodiorite, but lacking the mafic
inclusions, is found at the north property boundary. Some doubt remains as to
whether these are outcrop or boulder.
STRUCTURE;
Fabrics developed in the mafic metavolcanic and metasedimentary
sequences suggest the presence of east-west field of compression, possibly
related to the intrusion of the Trout Lake batholith.
Locally, a belt of intense drag folding, producing "M" and "W" style
folds, run parallel to lithologic units at the eastern end of the property.
Strongest folding is largely confined to meta-sedimentary units near the Balmer-
Bateman Township line (See Figure 2). Well developed boundinage, trending 012 0 ,
is also found near the township boundary, within argillites in contact with
iron formation.
Drag folds within mafic sequences are not as well pronounced, but the
generally shallow plunge of the folds toward the south is consistent with those
in the metasediments. Pillow flattening in basalts west of Adam's Lake trend
at 15 1* 0 .
A pervasive, north-south striking, steeply east and west dipping fol
iation is sympathetic to the outline of the Trout Lake intrusive; it turns slightly
to the southeast at the southern claim boundary of the property.
A lower hemisphere stereonet projection of joint and dyke orientations
show that while jointing is widely dispersed, mafic and felsic intrusives are
limited to two orientations {See Figure 3). Gabbro and diorite dykes strike
predominantly north-south, while felsic dykes strike north-south and east-west.
Faulting occurs north of the township line where a tectonic breccia,
trending at 211 0 and at least one metre in width, is exposed. Whether or not
this breccia represents a major northeast-southwest trending structure across
the property to the west is uncertain.
TREND AND PLUNGE OF FOLD AXES
FIG. 2
'JOINT AND DYKE ORIENTATIONS
-.—J-o-—.
FIG. 3 POLE TO JOINT
POLE TO DYKE o FELSIC
AMAFIC
ECONOMIC GEOLOGY;
Although mineralization was encountered in all environments, the most
significant quantities were confined to iron formation, argillites, and quartz
veins.
Within the iron formations, minerals such as magnetite, pyrite, pyrrhotite,
chalcopyrite, and bornite were observed. In most cases the mineralization was
fine grained and disseminated. The copper minerals occurred in trace amounts.
Within the argillites, pyrite, magnetite, and arsenopyrite were present,
the latter of which was finely disseminated and occurred in trace amounts.
Qjjartz veining occurred sporadically, in widths up to 30 centimetres,
in all environments. Magnetite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and malachite were
observed. The copper minerals again occurred in trace amounts.
Mineralization within mafic sequences was rare (Sample P4l), but when
encountered included trace amounts of finely dissiminated pyrite and/or arseno
pyrite. This rock was often silicified, but no gold values were returned.
Traces of pyrite were sometimes present in the mafic and felsic
intrusive rocks.
Select grab samples from all environments were assayed for gold and
silver. No visible gold was observed. Only one gold assay returned was above
"trace" in amount. Sample P28-1 assayed 0.03 ozs.:.AuXton, and was located in
a si ightly si lici f ied metasediment near the contact with a diorite dyke. Several
silver assays returned values in the 0.50 ozs. Ag/ton range, but only one
sample, P-l^S-B-Z, was above one ounce. Specifically, this assay of l.OA ozs. Ag/
ton was located in a foliated metagabbro containing less than one percent dis
seminated pyrite.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDAT I ONS;.
Much of the area comprising the south east section of the Pindar Claim
Group has no surface exposure of bedrock. In the eastern most claims, where
outcrop is abundant, the present survey was successful in outlining a series of
sub-parallel chemical and clastic metasedimentary units which can be correlated
with known geophysical anomalies. Similar anomalies exist in areas where bed
rock is not exposed, and may represent more metasedimentary horizons. Previous
operators have investigated parts of these units, mainly in an area just north
of Adam's Lake. High, yet erratic gold values were returned.
Conductors identified by geology and/or geophysics currently represent
the best exploration targets, and will require being tested by diamond drills.
Those not exposed on surface should be given priority so that geological information
can be recovered from areas with thick overburden. Beyond this, development of
new exploration targets on the property will be necessary.
As a means to this end, the following preliminary guidelines are
suggested:
1. In conjunction with a more regional program, samples from outcrop areas and
recovered drill core should be collected, described, and analyzed using whole
rock geochemistry. With this, geochemical "background values" can be assigned
to rock types in a certain area.
2. When gold mineralization is encountered, a similar program can be applied to
identify minerals associated with the gold, and zones of alteration surrounding
it. Hopefully, a geochemical signature can be identified with this mineral-
izat ion.
The above, if carried out with future mapping and drilling, may
provide tools identifying mineralization which lacks geophysical expression, and
serve as a basis for developing new exploration targets.
OCTOBER 1983 STEPHEN McGIBBON
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION
l, Stephen McGibbon, fulfilled the requirements for a B.Se. (Honours,
Geological Sciences) degree from Queen's University in May 1983.
l have worked in the field of mineral exploration since the summer of
1981, and am presently employed by Goldquest Exploration Inc., as a contract
geologist.
l have no financial interest in the properties or securities of Goldquest
Exploration Inc.
October 31, 1983
Signed: Stephen McGibbon
52Ne4SE0002 8 .7616 BALMER TWP
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File No J?
900
TYPE OF SURVEY
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
GEOPHYSICAL
GEOLOGICAL
GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
Signature of Assessor
Date
i
f" , X v Ministry of |C0 J Natural
" y\7^// Resources Ontario
, Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
The Mining Act
f*- 8 c. o ^ f.Instructions: — Please type'or pfint.
— If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a list.
/yNote: — Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Do not use shaded areas below.
Type of Survey(s) Townsffip or Area
Claim Holder's)
(S-0 JLDQUZSTAddress
y/ C.
(Prospectors Licence No.
l 7" A? .2. O
Survey Comparg ;t^oo ..A? 0.^0.* A/f/,0*. .-.vfTT. J^rr, To^o^ro. 0/tr, Ms 4 3ny A Date of Survey (from Si to) Total Miles of line *B*.
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report): l ffi l 0& l M? l Vr3 V*
— /iorxf-tj X?Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions
For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
- Electromagnetic
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here - Electromagnetic
DMINING IVe c E i y'
Note: S pecial provisiocredits do not apply 4 to Airborne Surveys.
romagnettc
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Expenditures (excludes'power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature
Certification Verifying Report of Work
BATEMAN TR -M.2I39
I
KHL S0*348 14878
- L - 4 - - J l i l
*v'4-i' i — -- — — - - — \*"" IMLSL V0KS7WSS78BSSL7t8ss7"'ii"^k-4— f— l—
^.^. — —— ——— -.4 —— -^j— — rr^ KRL i KML T i
- -* " — j i
^81*18* \5t*l*8\^. — *— — — T
K " L l
.l l
528180 J826I81 J85JI77 1509081,509090~* "17^7" "™"I"^J**** "4- O^.T" "i"* — *— — 4- *^ — — -
l K W L*
Wfof\H0M I C2I220 {WU! \ 6 # Ml l " L-
i f i tif ~" ~ 80/9168'8091*1 V fm.
1623569)623567
l l ,]"""-1KRL r^ D-v\ , S * J i J-'-Y^ \ J lf KRt-T -KRL ^L^09,7^*'70 \ "V ̂ ' '^/^\ ™^"\ 6Z3564 l l t ---U •BO/616618091 *8jft^~r ""'~ ~ ~ "t ~ ~| 62396 162356. J f *CRL" ^'l^^il'-J^a / K "L|KRL " "V-l
! l BO^I78,80*W4J N ij"- ^Jn i ^ f l l ~ -grfT-g O Y\ l l '809171 ^09,67 *Q^I WJffH84""l 8 **W* 8423I
16255*5 1623562
844184 .8*384* |
IcRL l
1509844;
116
tom tom
rt3849
KRL"'~ j KRL y j KRL yTm663*90 JBCBtM !**3*B^ '863*81'l'
"TtRL j KRL KRL
Balmer Twp. M.2137
?5i
y
/Af?/
-r
'dMl NVW31V9
H)
Q
? i .\
iJl^
-^-l
^—}-
-/ON
: *
_y.
S
; /*
-^
i y f/ *
. *^
t Ib
l f
~
^rfyls
/—r""
*" ^
-*-
^ u
^4-^
-j—f
-
— —
; F —
i
ft
f
BATEMAN TWP
BALMER TWP.
509548(54676)
~
•'.-•" OUTCROP
(PHtJ) OUTCROP AJi/MBCR
S/ j^/V Fot-"rnoN; wi*, Stalin,
/ QV D/Kt dpwrt(?TZ V<J'
//) /li M n** x.Y' I'Y lil DM** F^UiS bfifH pwribt P lRCCTJOM ' * t 3 * "
2JI /V~A^W FrtwtT UHTtf 71?**^ DiJZfcno^
S' MU. c W WTH oKifHT*Tlo*
-V./S* . — - — — - — ' — '" : C**J7XCT " OSSERv'CD JflFjERRED,
6CoPHYS'C#{. /NTfRPRClTtTifiN
i t t ' t *
Js~~lt~~ " 'W^^*— jt — — RdgDfft *F WET ^?iffE*9
— —"" -— — *~ p* O f? D
EI Q S )f i
'4yjll0 UP WU. TauirKP5 ftoP
T F-ORESTfO flCCfl
^ '
t '
\
,1C
. ?T r f
e ?m
l
ft
*
5
*
tuOo *N
-Jm
24 N , ——— r^,T^^r^^T
T""' "~""~ " ' | 7 - ^
f A ' - ?7 ? *J ' r* — f—- Jli. sr rwtfc i ^i rf— f-,—., __ , -f- i r — h~'1"" — — 4-^i—i . i '
/'"•"h''— v, ^ . ** i *-^r J ^'* r^- iI * " l -5r
4—-,-— 'J '' 41 — ~" —— r— — -4 7 1 rt o K i T CI J
rf i ^~ — ' — " — r/ - r- ~JL? 2 N d 1 spruce r 7 ~T~- — r
X J f ~
K ^ 'o!d^ y A 563852
- J ^ i " Tf—'-~- h-jy^—- , —— r----jUift^
7 l ^ ^ ^ ——— '*— ~- r——
* \
^--^--j" . ^\N ^1 *-^ J " T———— r—— N^yiilOj^^^ ^^
^ "'/'* j 1 - i/^
ir^ce, - j -r By "/^ i --- ^/\- 1 /- ?7// "^-••-y-*-- - ,--'.^ ^"',y: ^ , , *r
f , ^ ,,^1 * ^'-,
- - — , , - ~, __ L ..-^.r^ .™, - . ,.^| .^4^, . sp^c^ i _ ,.^,^ ripr^c^ j ' *" r f TT~ i
1 ; 1 1 t ^X ,
X1--^ *
^-u-^-^"^^" — I't — - — .i— ̂ ^ * xs ^ 563854r"v * * \ ' * i\ spruce t
^ -r , ^ J. .- ^ ——— — ( — -— --j-4-~,., .1,.^, -.. r .-^.,,,T __ ...^ - l _
- | oprur*. " ^ r--—— -T--
\ i- ! f * * V. ' ^id^r
* \ I— —— . ———— e-i —— i —— 0 — l —— , —— , ————— t —— , —— , —— , —— i
^ ——— - — - ———— - — — — ~ ——————————————— - ——— - —r" '~
LEGEND
- FFI ST TO irJTpRMfniATr PI innwir INTRUSIVE
8 . 8A GRANITE .QUARTZ MONZONITE
l^ww , rp| cir TO iwTrRurniATF HYPABYSSAI INTRUSIVES
7 ;. : 7A QUARTZ PORPHYRY
7C QUARTZ- FELDSPAR PORPHYRY
7D PEGMATITE, FELSITE, APLITE
.^jM^fi— MAFIC TO ULTRAMAFIC INTRUSIVES
H^Bfcll GA GABBRO, DIORITETS"ffllHiy 'frJ Am^
^^^^v m 6C PERIDOTITE
n6D LAMPROPHYRE
,". ,. — THFMir*! UFTA*;FniMFHTfi
g - 5A CHERT H5B OXIDE FACIES IRON FORMATION
' - 5C CARBONATE FACIES IRON FORMATION 5D SULPHIDE FACIES IRON FORMATION
56 GRAPHITE .
p- CLASTIC METASEOIMENTS
ff||l||p i - 4* ARGILLITE , MUDSTONE
I^V^1! J 4B ARENITE, ARKOSE, GREYWACKE^
^^ 4C CONGLOMERATE
i FFI SIC UFTAV01 CAMICS
3 '- " 3A HOMOGENOUS TO PORPHYRITIC FLOWS
—————— [ ^ 3B PYROCLASTIC BRECCIA, TUFF BRECCIA , AGGLOMERATE
| ^ 3C TUFT, LAPILLI TUFF, LAPILLISTONE
3D SPHERULITIC FLOWS
3E RHYOLITIC
5F DACITIC
,,, .,. |NTFRMFm*TF UFTAVOI CAWICfi
2 1 2* HOMOGENOUS TO PORPHYRITIC FLOWS
—— ---— a ^0 2B PYROCLASTIC BRECCIA, TUFF BRECCIA, AGGLOMERATE
— 9H 2C TUFF; LAPILLI TUFF, LAPILLISTONE
20 AMYGDALOIDAL FLOW
2E ANDESITIC
2F DACITie
2P PILLOWED FLOWt
. ., . ..— MfiFIC TO ULTRAMAFIC MFTAVOI CANICS
1 -,V ' A HOMOGENOUS TO PORPHYRITIC FLOWS* - *t ' - - 1- _———— ̂ ^ ^PB B PYROCLASTIC BRECCIA, TUFF BRECCIA, AGGLOMERATE
^9 C TUFF, LAPILLI TUFF, LAPILLISTONE
D AMYGDALOIDAL FLOWS
E FLOW BRECCIA
m F CHLORITE 1 T ALC-CHLORITE SCHIST
P PILLOWED FLOWS
V VARIOLITIC FLOWS
I! X SPINIFEX
BH I.6A MASSIVE FLOW POSSIBLY INTRUSIVE
i; t
i
. - i
\ ' -
f
i-
; ' i
i: . - , ; - Lt - , . ,\-, \ . ' -•"•" :; ;. - -• :---.'';
•^*W*sr j' , ' /-. - .
,, j ; ' -- - j ;--^/ ";--,-^,v,;.-^i f
" 1
NAST.
lMag.
"""t ^
i
f 5 r^ | . --- _ ; ^, '
1 P'le- - T ' * * , t
1~ A | ^
prucfi ^ | X-^'~^"A,
^——^. 4^ f ^ \ i r ^"* "~-^—- -r— .—^ ___ J, f w(d*r ^ \ t
r" - i -— *— — ̂ — i^ — ̂ ^ .^.^" t 't, j4 Sprue P 'f ' 1 T f ^- -f
^ ( J ^ X T y 4ld*^ ^ ^ Spruce
* ] ; ^63853li
H t [ , ' * i *-:———— ' ——— - f———— ,- ___ ̂ ____ r—— --jL^ \ * f
1 ' /^ "t " — T——-**- r- ———— t -^ * riu, 1 :2 '
f
j .. ! ^ -' \ ;
^7 ' — -^-^-^-^.^ , i tT ~] —— —— .--..^ ____ ^, ___ it
* ' ""^-/, i*f N
ice- v . Sprxv^, jj -s——— —— . ————————— , ——— , — , — ̂
^ A r -' P t )
* /.y-V-——— ——— ———— --f———— r-4-r——— T--H _____ , _____ -^ 'ON
* ^\ ^.pruc-e , | | aW*.r-s ^ f l *^7 -x ^b+AAJ ^
*\ t *\*
\ 563939 ^^/*y ^ f ^ " t,\ spruce. ^
V i 1
} ', , , y , J, . h -- —— i — **i
Kali ?1fe4 fi*̂'' !i' ''1
'--J
^;ir/'^•f ''K
,-i
f -..1
•*
t
3 1i 1
it 'i
. \ L
GOLDSUfSTDICKENSON
FELSIC TO INTERMEDIATE HYPABYSSAL INTRUSIVES
7A QUARTZ PORPHYRY
7B ' FELDSPAR PORPHYRY
7C QUARTZ- FELDSPAR PORPHYRY
7D PEGMATITE, FELSITE,APUTE
MAFIC TO ULTRAMAFIC INTRUSIVES
6A GABBRO, DIORITE
6B PYROXENITE
6C PERIDOTITE
6D LAMPROPHYRE
CHEMICAL METASEDIMENTS5A CHERT5B OXIDE FACIES IRON FORMATION
CARBONATE FACIES IRON FORMATION
SULPHIDE FACIES IRON FORMATION
GRAPHITE
METASEDIMENTS
ARGILLITE .MUDSTONE
ARENITE, ARKOSE, GREYW AC KE
CONGLOMERATEu)|TW ORIENTATION
FELSIC METAVOLCANICS
3A HOMOGENOUS TO PORPHYR1TJC FLOWS
|^ J] 38 PYROCLASTIC BRECCIA.TUFF BRECCIA, AGGLOMERATE
TUFT, LAPILLI TUFF, LAPILLISTONE
SPHERULITIC FLOWS
RHYOL1TIC
DACITIC
INTERMEDIATE METAVOLCANICS
2A HOMOGENOUS TO PORPHYRITIC FLOWS
2B PYROCLASTIC BRECCIA.TUFF BRECCIA, AGGLOMERATE
TUFF, LAPILLI TUFF, LAPILLISTONE
AMYGDALOIDAL FLOW
ANDESITIC
DACITIC
PILLOWED FLOW
OF Cu.i9ffEi)
\ \\ ,l y * ,n//,'/UK fm.'MAFIC TO ULTRAMAFIC METAVOLCANICS
A HOMOGENOUS TO PORPHYRITIC FLOWSB PYROCLASTIC 8RECCI A, TUFF BRECCIA, AGGLOMERATE
TUFF, LAPILLI TUFF, LAPILLISTONEAMYGDALOIDAL FLOWSFLOW BRECCIACHLORITE t T ALC-CHLORITE SCHISTPILLOWED FLOWSVARIOLITIC FLOWSSPINIFEXMASSIVE FLOW POSSIBLY INTRUSIVE
S L1 r v e y e d -̂ i o \
C: StaKtid ctaiiti
tf v \\ \ *li i rt**\ \ V
1 */ \ *A\Jr*\/ Y v\ x-T * ^ \
BM t MAN J vVP
•o*.
D A M ' 5
:374
GOLDOUEST tlxrLORATION INC
LJ :C K F N SO'N L'P O :- COMPANIES
kVN SH! PS , ONTAR!0
DATfc" fEB.
"fi--
S CAL t : 2500
83
DRAWN BY: D. L NTS 52 N 7 4, SHEET 4 J