rs and gis integration course (grs-60312) introduction
TRANSCRIPT
RS and GIS Integration Course (GRS-60312)
Introduction
Arnold Bregt, Ron van Lammeren, Arend Ligtenberg, John Stuiver, Sytze de Bruin, Harm Bartholomeus, Aldo Bergsma, Philip Wenting, Jan Clevers, Martin Herold
and Lammert Kooistra (Course Coordinator)
Laboratory for Geo-Information and Remote Sensing – Wageningen University
RGIC: The Geo-Information cycle and back
validation
Theme: Innovation in geo-business!
to
Scientist Consultant
source: www.magicmud.com
From
Things to do this morning
First half:
Background course: modules, assessment, …
Planning
Academic Consultancy Training (ACT): objective, planning, …
Project groups
Fieldwork and excursion issues
Second half:
Communications skills I
Background RS and GIS Integration course
RS and GIS Integration Course = RGIC
History: AMC II and RGIC old style
OWI Requirement: Academic Consultancy Training (ACT)
Changes:
Modules & objectives: new module Design of Integrated Monitoring System
Assessment: increased importance of ACT
Website = http://www.geo-informatie.nl/courses/grs60312/
Learning outcomes RGIC (GRS60312)
Design an integrated monitoring system for a specified environmental process according to the concepts of integration in the geo-information cycle.
Contribute interactively to the determination of the goals of a project with a client (third party) and formulate a project plan (define results, suitable phasing of activities and distribution of tasks among team members).
Implement formulated goals through design and test of a processing protocol for calibration or validation of a geo-spatial model.
Select and integrate information gathered in their disciplinary field into a project deliverable as appropriate to the interdisciplinary design and in conformity to disciplinary quality standards.
Demonstrate the understanding of the proper use of GIS- and remote sensing concepts, methods and data when carrying out a project from A to Z.
Communicate and co-operate effectively with group members, client, process coach, content expert and other parties involved during the various stages of the project.
Accomplishing tasks within given constraints on time and other resources. Assess the contribution of themselves, team members and other stakeholders on
team functioning and execution of project tasks and appropriately reflect on these and give feedback in writing and verbally.
RGIC set-up
Academic Consultancy Training (ACT) project (20 d)
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Project proposal Analysis Report & Presentation
+ excursions: 2 days
Management
skills
Project
management
Communication
(2 d)
Geo-skills
GSNS
LBS
Field
Spectroscopy
(4 d)
Design of Integrated Monitoring System (DIMS: 9 d)
Modules and objectives
Module Group composition
End-product Contact
Design of Integrated Monitoring System
ACT teams Report DIMS and presentation of demonstrator
Lammert Kooistra
Fieldwork ACT teams Validation and fieldwork plan
Lammert Kooistra
Excursion ACT teams Presentation and discussion (incl reflection paper)
John Stuiver Lammert Kooistra
ACT project ACT teams Proposal + end-product + process
Lammert Kooistra
Assessment I
No final exam
Course will be evaluated as follows:
DIMS (40%)
ACT project (60%) (details in assessment III)
All parts of the course have to be sufficient (5.5 at least) to pass the course.
Assessment II Assessment strategy (Toetsplan) GRS-60312 RS & GIS Integration Course
rep
ort
des
ign
mo
nit
ori
ng
syst
em
valid
atio
n a
nd
fie
ldw
ork
pla
n
pre
sen
tati
on
dem
on
stra
tor
mo
nit
ori
ng
syst
em
pro
ject
pla
n c
on
sult
ancy
pro
ject
fin
al p
rod
uct
co
nsu
ltan
cy p
roje
ct
coac
h a
sses
smen
t p
roce
ss
mu
tual
ass
essm
ent
pro
cess
1 Design an integrated monitoring system for a specified environmental process according to the concepts of integration in the geo-information cycle X X X
2 Formulate a project plan (define results, suitable phasing of activities and distribution of tasks among team members)
and contribute interactively to the determination of the goals of the project with a client (third party). X
3 Design and test a processing protocol for calibration or validation of a geo-spatial model according to the formulated project goals. X X
4 Select and integrate information gathered in their disciplinary field and produce a project deliverable as appropriate
to the interdisciplinary design and in conformity to disciplinary quality standards. X X
5 Demonstrate the understanding of the proper use of GIS- and remote sensing concepts, methods and data when carrying out a project from A to Z. X X
6 Analyze and reflect on communication and co-operation with group members, client, process coach, content expert and
other parties involved during the various stages of the project. X
7 Organize and accomplish tasks within given constraints on time and other resources. X X
8 Assess the contribution of themselves, team members and other stakeholders on team functioning and execution of
project tasks and appropriately reflect on these and give feedback in writing and verbally.X
contribution to final mark (%) 25 5 10 10 25 12,5 12,5
Planning I
week 1
Monday May 6 (C30) Tuesday May 7 (C30) Wednesday May 8 (C30) Thursday May 9 Friday May 10
Morning (8:30-12:15) intro course/project (LK) 8:30 kick-off meeting DIMS 8:30 projectman (AB) holiday DIMS: design
Communications Skills I Ascenion Day
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) first meeting coach preparation meeting
(RL, SB, HB, JS, AL, LK) feedback session commissioner deadline expectation paper
week 2
Monday May 13 Tuesday May 14(C30 ) Wednesday May 15 Thursday May 16 Friday May 17
Morning (8:30-12:15) meeting commissioner Intro DIMS (RL): DIMS: design DIMS:design project proposal
communication &
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) project proposal visualization
guest lecture: Dawn Wright (Chief Scientist ESRI) feedback session
week 3
Monday May 20 Tuesday May 21(C30 ) Wednesday May 22 Thursday May 23 Friday May 24
Morning (8:30-12:15) holiday Intro DIMS (LK):fieldwork feedback fieldwork plan DIMS: fieldwork or project proposal
Whit Monday and validation plan design
Afternoon (13:15-17:15)
deadline fieldwork plan deadline concept proposal
week 4
Monday May 27 Tuesday May 28 Wednesday May 29 Thursday May 30 Friday May 31
Morning (8:30-12:15) fieldwork Skills for geo-business in Achterhoek near Groenlo (5 overnight stays) Communication Skills II
GNSS (PW, LK) field spectroscopy DIMS: validation fieldwork DIMS: validation fieldwork
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) (HB, JC, LK)
13:00 return to Wageningen
Planning II
week 5
Monday June 3 (C30) Tuesday June 4 Wednesday June 5 Thursday June 6 Friday June 7
Morning (8:30-12:15) Project proposal:feedback Analysis phase Analysis phase
deadline DIMS report session deadline final proposal
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) DIMS: final presentations (RL, SB, HB, JS, AL, LK) Analysis phase
(LK, RL, MH)
week 6
Monday June 10 Tuesday June 11 Wednesday June 12 Thursday June 13 Friday June 14
Morning (8:30-12:15) analysis phase excursion analysis phase analysis phase analysis phase
SHELL and ESRI
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) (JS, LK)
week 7
Monday June 17 Tuesday June 18 Wednesday June 19 Thursday June 20 Friday June 21
Morning (8:30-12:15) analysis phase excursion analysis phase analysis phase analysis phase
ALLIANDER
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) (JS, LK)
week 8
Monday June 24 Tuesday June 25 Wednesday June 26 Thursday June 27 Friday June 28
Morning (8:30-12:15) reporting reporting prepare presentation presentations projects evaluation meeting
with coach
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) (RL, SB, HB, JS, AL, LK)
deadline project report deadline reflection paper
Open innovation: connecting in geo-business
Steven Johnson:
Where good ideas come from
TED talk: start at 12:20
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0af00UcTO-c
Story on the invention of GPS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Johnson_(author)
Course philosophy
Real life: different activities
Independence
Own responsibility
Keep an eye on the process
group
yourself
Grab the opportunity to learn how to do geo-business
… and have fun!
Academic Consultancy Training (ACT)
Academic Consultancy Training (ACT)
Content
Project topic
Project proposal
Report
Final presentation
Process
Team: roles, meeting skills, negotiation, etc.
Individual: learning outcomes, reflection
Communication with commissioner, expert, coach you
team
commissioner
coach
expert
Course guide ACT in RGIC
Course guide available on website
Project Management Skills (Wed May 8: 8:30)
Communication Skills I + II
Available rooms and computer facilities
Team site
Self assessment dossier
Goal: to structure the monitoring of your progress on aims of course and self-defined learning outcomes
Basis for coach to assess process of student
Application letter: motivation project choice + CV
Expectation paper: self-assessment + learning outcomes
Reflection paper: reflection on outcomes and progress
Interviews (2x): individual between coach and student
Assessment III
ACT module is 60% of complete mark of RGIC course
ACT assessment composed of following parts:
Written self assessment (passed (Go) or failed (No Go))
Project proposal (15%) (coach 50% + SPM teacher 50%)
Product (42.5%) (50% - expert, 25% coach, 25% commissioner) Note: The oral presentation part of the final product is included in the mark of the coach.
Process (42.5%) (50% coach, 50% mutual assessment team) Note: The mark of the coach is leading for the average mark of the students’ mutual assessment and when students are treated unfairly (too high or too low grades) during the mutual assessment, the coach may overrule such mutual assessments
ACT planning 2013 Schedule ACT RS&GIS Integration Course Date Time Room
week activity
1 Start of course + Communication Skills (part I) Mon 6-May 8.30 - 12.15 C30
Meeting with team coach Mon 6-May from 13:30 planned 2 h tbd
Training project management Wed 8-May 8.30 - 12.15 C30
Prepare first meeting with commissioner Wed 8-May 13.15 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Hand in expectation paper Fri 11-May by email to team coach
2 First visit to commissioner Mon 13-May appointment
Work on project proposal Mon 13-May 13.15 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Personal starting interview Mon-Wed 13-16-May appointment with team coach
Work on project proposal Fri 17-May 8.15 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
3 Work on project proposal Fri 24-May 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Hand in concept project proposal before 17:00 Fri 24-May by email to coach
4 Communication skills (part II) Fri 31-May 8.30 - 12.15 Groenlo
5 Discussion of proposal (1 hour per team) plus
written feedback on main points
Tue 4-June appointment between 10.00 - 12.00
Work on project proposal Tue 4-June 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Hand in final project proposal before 12.00 Wed 5-June by email to coach and client
Work on project: analysis phase Wed-Fri 5-7-June 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Teacher gives written feedback plus mark
for proposal before Friday 12.00
Fri 7-June
6 Work on project: analysis phase Mon-Fri 10-14-June 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Midterm meeting + introduction mutual assessment Mon 10-June appointment with team coach
7 Work on project: analysis phase Mon-Fri 17-21 June 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
8 Work on project: analysis phase Mon 24-June 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
hand in final product/preparation of final
presentation before 17.00 Tue 25-June by email to coach and client
hand in final reflection paper Wed 26-June by email to coach
presentation of the project Thur 27-June appointment tbd
final team assessment Fri 28-June appointment coach
final performance interview Fri 28-June appointment coach
Team planning
Team composition
Team planning
Fieldwork and excursion issues
Validation in the GI cycle
“real”
land use
validation error matrix
source: www.lgn.nl
Solution: fieldwork
Planning Fieldwork: Skills for Geobusiness
Sunday May 26: Arrival at Reirinck from 19:00
Monday May 27: GNSS
Tuesday May 28: field spectroscopy
Wednesday May 29: fieldwork DIMS
Thursday May 30: fieldwork DIMS
Friday May 31: communication skills II + return to Wageningen (13:00)
Change to practical points fieldwork PPT
Excursion issues
Excursion 1 Tuesday June 11: ESRI (Rotterdam) and SHELL (Rijswijk) Departure: 7:30 AM in front of GAIA (by bus) Return: 20:30 PM
Excursion 2 Tuesday June 18: ALLIANDER (Arnhem) and TBD Departure: 8:00 AM in front of GAIA (by bus) Return: 19:00 PM
Final presentations at customer day in Wageningen Thursday June 27: End presentations and posters for commissioners
and other interested colleagues (ideas welcome)
General Program
Company introduction student team (15m)
Which initial and final view do you have on the company/organisation?
How do they position the organisation in the GI-field?
What role do you see for yourself in such type of organisation?
Presentations companies (…)
Final discussion (30m)
Initial view on company
Changing views
Your role/ambitions
Final product for excursion
In the final reflection paper write a specific paragraph on the excursions focussing:
Science/research vs. consultant/engineer
Dilemma’s
Differences in working approach, culture
How do you see your role in a future career
After break communication skills I
RS and GIS Integration Course (GRS-60312)
Communication Skills part 1
Communication skills I
For all teamwork: DIMS and ACT
In RS & GIS Integration Course
Objective: develop and train your professional skills
Ranging between team skills (self) reflection skills
Communication skills I
What could you expect of your future working situation?
Working in a project team: what does that mean?
Formal: meeting skills, team functions, commissioner, …
Group process: (give and receive) feedback, Rose of Leary, negotiation
What and how can I learn from working in a project team?
Reflection on group process and your role in this
Formulate learning goals + looking back if and you achieved them: expectation and reflection paper + individual meetings
What could you expect in your future working situation?
Phd Junior consultant
source: www.magicmud.com
Three layers of communication
procedure
process
In a team:
Objectives
Results
Facts & figures
Project
Structuring
Planning
Work plan
Action points
Power
Interests
Beliefs
Secrets
Conflicts
content
Communication: content and relation
That’s indeed a very good point that you put forward!
On content level comment about quality of argument.
On relational level the sentence could have different meanings:
This could break the discussion open!
Good point, bad timing!
Good point, why didn’t I think of it.
Again one of those points, let’s move on.
…
How people communicate
Emotional message Business messages
Words 7 20
Voice language 38 35
Body language 55 45
Working in a project team: what does that mean?
Formal (content & procedure):
meeting skills: purpose, planning, agenda, procedures, making decisions, brain storming
team functions: chairing, writing minutes
Commissioner: contact, getting information, keeping informed, negotiation
Process:
(give and receive) feedback
Roles: Rose of Leary and Belbin
Negotiation
Feedback rules
Self-assess first (“How do you think that it went?”)
Distinguish your observation (what you see and hear) and your interpretation (what it means for you)
Be specific (do not generalize) in your feedback
Be positive (what was good and what can be improved?)
Feedback is a means to help you to improve your communication skills!
Feedback
NOT: You were very nervous
Instead:
(facts): I found your speed of speaking very high
(interpretation): That made me think that you were nervous and also that what you were saying must not be so important.
(effect): The effect on me was that I had difficulty understanding what you were saying and staying interested.
Leary’s Rose: a theory about human interaction
leading
aggressive
compe-
titive
helping
co-operative
dependent withdrawn
defiant
opposed
below
together
above
REFLECTION
What and how can I learn from working in a project team?
What and how can I learn from working in a project team?
Reflection on group process and your role in this
Formulate learning goals + looking back if and you achieved them
Expectation and reflection paper + individual meetings with your coach
Reflection
Like looking in the mirror: how do I function in …
Helps to become more aware of how you act and maybe how to discover what your ideal way of learning is
You are your own mirror!
Personal reflection
1st person: world from own perspective: others are object without own point of view
2nd person: others have their own perspective, more interpretations of certain situation
3rd person: you can look from a distance to your own interactions with other people
Schematic view of different aspects of a person
Reflective learning cycle
Formulate learning goals
Reflective learning in RGIC
Coach: group meetings + personal interviews
Self assessment dossier:
Application letter: motivation project choice + CV
Expectation paper: self-assessment + learning goals
Reflection paper: reflection on outcomes and progress
Once in a lifetime experience!
Try to find a balance
Formulate personal learning goals
Think about experiences so far: both strong and weak points
Formulate what you want to learn
Formulate your goals positively
Goals can be formulated at different levels: knowledge, skills, attitude
Indicate the way you want to achieve your goals: formulate specific activities
Indicate at which level you are now and what level you want to achieve
Formulate personal learning goals: example
Who has already thought about it?
Formulate personal learning goals: examples
“I want to know more about accepted negotiating strategies in a professional context”.
“I want to learn and practice to be a chairperson in a decision making meeting”.
“I want to feel more confident during a meeting”: having sufficient knowledge about the topic of the meeting
putting my potential input on paper on beforehand
active interventions during a meeting
trying to realize why I feel so nervous and by doing this, try to overcome the nerves
communicating to the meeting that I have this problem of nervousness and asking them to assist me in one way or the other
Formulate personal learning goals: inspiration
“I” domain mainly: Keeping of appointments; Listening; Pro-active approach to process coaching and reflective learning; Self reflection; Accepting and using feedback; Pro-active execution of assigned team function (controller, member, manager, secretary); Pro-active execution of team tasks;
“I-We” domain mainly: Quality of oral feedback on group process; Collaboration; Persuasion; Application of Belbin team role model to a project team; Commitment to the group; Stimulation; Communication within the group;
“I-It” domain mainly: Pro-active approach to content coaching; Output orientation; Flexibility in approach to the project; Contribution during discussions on the basis of own disciplinary background;
Formulate personal learning goals: inspiration
“I-We-IT” domain mainly: Approach to procedural side of team work; Quality of oral feedback on products; Quality of written feedback on products
“It” domain mainly: Academic attitude in contribution to report; Written contribution on the basis of own disciplinary background; Commitment to the product; Commitment to the commissioner; Ability to separate means and goals while executing a project proposal; Ability to compile and select relevant information; Ability to integrate contribution with total project perspective; Contribution to written presentation of product(s) (lay-out)
“We” domain mainly: Team roles, Team thinking
“We-It” domain mainly: Academic attitude/contribution in discussions; Quality of written feedback on group process; Communication with external people; Cross disciplinary contribution to report; Cross disciplinary contribution in discussions
Formulate personal learning goals: level
Prepare expectation paper
Deadline: Friday May 10 end of the day
Send your paper to coach of project team
Appointment in week 2
Instructions:
Course website: http://www.geo-informatie.nl/courses/grs60312/material2012/Format_expectation_paperRGIC2012.pdf
Assignment Learning goals (20 minutes)
Groups of 2
Everybody is preparing 2 learning goals for him/herself for 2 different levels
Discuss the learning goals together: why, do they agree with stated rules, are they realistic
Summary
ACT: next to content also process is a learning outcome
Try to build in ‘reflection moments’:
Make short notes after meetings
During team meetings
Read background material CS
Communication skills I
END
Communication skills II
Team roles
Core qualities
Mutual assessment
Afsluiting
© Wageningen UR