RST Bibliography from the RST web site (http://www.sfu.ca/rst) Abelen, Eric, Gisela Redeker and Sandra A. Thompson. (1993). The rhetorical structure of US-American

and Dutch fund-raising letters. Text, 13 (3), 323-350. Afantenos, Stergos D. (2007). Some reflections on the task of content determination in the context of

multi-document summarization of evolving events. In G. Angelova, K. Bontcheva, R. Mitkov, N. Nicolov and N. Nikolov (Eds.), Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2007) (pp. 12-16). Borovets, Bulgaria: INCOMA.

Afantenos, Stergos D and Nicolas Hernandez. (2009). What's in a message? Proceedings of the EACL 2009 Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Acquisition (pp. 18-25). Athens, Greece.

Afantenos, Stergos D, Vangelis Karkaletsis and Panagiotis Stamatopoulos. (2005). Summarization from medical documents: a survey. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 33 (2), 157-177.

Afantenos, Stergos D., Irene Doura, Eleni Kapellou and Vangelis Karkaletsis. (2004). Exploiting cross-document relations for multi-document evolving summarization. In G. A. Vouros and T. Panayiotopoulos (Eds.), Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of 3rd Hellenic Conference on AI, SETN 2004 (pp. 410-419). Berlin: Springer.

Afantenos, Stergos D., Vangelis Karkaletsis, Panagiotis Stamatopoulos and Constantin Halatsis. (2008). Using synchronic and diachronic relations for summarizing multiple documents describing evolving events. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 30 (3), 183-226.

Ahmed, Nabeel, Sharifulah Khan, Khalid Latif and Asad Masood. (2008). Extracting semantic annotations and their correlation with document components. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET) (pp. 32-37). Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Allen, R. B., Y. J. Wu and J. Luo. (2005). Interactive causal schematics for qualitative scientific explanations. In Digital Libraries: Implementing Strategies and Sharing Experiences, Proceedings (Vol. 3815, pp. 411-415).

Alonso i Alemany, Laura and Maria Fuentes Fort. (2003). Integrating cohesion and coherence for automatic summarization. Proceedings of EACL'03 Student Research Workshop (pp. 1-8). Budapest, Hungary.

Altenberg, Bengt. (2002). Concessive connectors in English and Swedish. In H. Hasselgård, S. Johansson, B. Behrens and C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Information Structure in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective (pp. 21-43). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

André, Elisabeth and Thomas Rist. (1996). Coping with temporal constraints in multimedia presentation planning. Proceedings of Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 142-147). Portland, Oregon.

Andriessen, Jerry, Koenraad de Smedt and Michael Zock. (1996). Discourse Planning: Experimental and modeling approaches. In T. Dijkstra and K. de Smedt (Eds.), Computational Psycholinguistics: Symbolic and Network Models of Language Processing (pp. 247-278). London: Taylor and Francis.

Androutsopoulos, I., D. Spiliotopoulos, K. Stamatakis, A. Dimitromanolaki, V. Karkaletsis and C. D. Spyropoulos. (2002). Symbolic authoring for multilingual natural language generation. In Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2308, pp. 131-142).

Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. (2001). A estrutura retorica de textos orais e de textos escritos (Rhetorical structure of oral and written texts). Acta Scientiarum, 23 (1), 19-25.

Antonio, Juliano Desiderato. (2004). Estrutura retórica e articulação de orações em narrativas orais e em narrativas escritas do português (Rhetorical structure and clause combining in oral narratives and written narratives in Brazilian Portuguese). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil.

Arens, Yigal. (1992). Multimedia Presentation Planning as an Extension of Text Planning. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 587, 278-280.

Arens, Yigal and Eduard Hovy. (1995). The Design of a Model-Based Multimedia Interaction Manager. Artificial Intelligence Review, 9 (2-3), 167-188.

1

Argamon, Shlomo, Jeff Dodick and Paul Chase. (2008). Language use reflects scientific methodology: A corpus-based study of peer-reviewed journal articles. Scientometrics, 75 (2), 203-238.

Asher, Nicholas. (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Asher, Nicholas, Farah Benamara and Yvette Yannick Mathieu. (2008). Categorizing opinion in

discourse. Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2008) (pp. 835-836). Patras, Greece.

Asher, Nicholas, Farah Benamara and Yvette Yannick Mathieu. (2008). Distilling opinion in discourse: A preliminary study. Proceedings of COLING (pp. 7-10). Manchester, UK.

Asher, Nicholas, Farah Benamara and Yvette Yannick Mathieu. (2009). Appraisal of opinion expressions in discourse. Linguisticae Investigationes, 32 (2), 279-292.

Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides. (1994). Intentions and information in discourse. Proceedings of 32nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'94) (pp. 34-41). Las Cruces, New Mexico.

Asher, Nicholas and Alex Lascarides. (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Asher, Nicholas, Laurent Prévot and Laure Vieu. (2007). Setting the background in discourse. Discours, 1, [Online], Put online on 03 April 2008. URL : http://discours.revues.org//index2301.html. Consulted on 2008 May 2008.

Azar, Moshe. (1999). Argumentative text as rhetorical structure: An application of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Argumentation, 13 (1), 97-144.

Babaii, Esmat. (2007). Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. Discourse and Society, 18 (2), 223-237.

Baldridge, Jason, Nicholas Asher and Julie Hunter. (2007). Annotation for and robust parsing of discourse structure on unrestricted texts. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft (26), 213-239.

Ballard, D. Lee , Robert J. Conrad and Robert E. Longacre. (1971). Interclausal relations. Foundations of Language, 7 (1), 70-118.

Ballard, D. Lee, Robert J. Conrad and Robert E. Longacre. (1971). More on the Deep and Surface Grammar of Interclausal Relations. Santa Ana, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Bärenfänger, Maja, Mirco Hilbert, Henning Lobin, Harald Lüngen and Csilla Puskás. (2006). Cues and constraints for the relational discourse analysis of complex text types: The role of logical and generic document structure. In C. L. Sidner, J. Harpur, A. Benz and P. Kühnlein (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse (pp. 27-34). Maynooth, Ireland.

Bärenfänger, Maja, Henning Lobin, Harald Lüngen and Mirco Hilbert. (2006). Using OWL ontologies in discourse parsing. Proceedings of the Workshop of Ontologies in Text Technology. Osnabrück, Germany.

Barzilay, Regina and Mirella Lapata. (2005). Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 141-148). Ann Arbor, MI.

Barzilay, Regina and Mirella Lapata. (2008). Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach. Computational Linguistics, 34 (1-34).

Bateman, John. (1990). Finding translation equivalents: An application of grammatical metaphor. Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'90) (Vol. 2, pp. 13-18). Helsinki, Finland.

Bateman, John and Judy Delin. (2005). Rhetorical structure theory. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 589-596). Oxford: Elsevier.

Bateman, John, Judy Delin and Patrick Allen. (2000). Constraints on layout in multimodal document generation. Proceedings of First International Natural Language Generation Conference, Workshop on Coherence in Generated Multimedia. Mitzpe Ramon, Israel.

Bateman, John, Thomas Kamps, Jörg Kleinz and Klaus Reichenberger. (2001). Towards constructive text, diagram, and layout generation for information presentation. Computational Linguistics, 27 (3), 409-449.

2

Bateman, John and Klaas Jan Rondhuis. (1997). Coherence relations: Towards a general specification. Discourse Processes, 24, 3-49.

Baumgarten, N. (2007). Converging conventions? Macrosyntactic conjunction with English and and German und. Text & Talk, 27 (2), 139-170.

Beekman, John and John Callow. (1974). Translating the Word of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.

Bell, Mark A. (2001). Online notes on the structure of argument essays. Retrieved June 25, 2004, from http://www.users.bigpond.com/m487396/Argument/essay_notes.htm

Benwell, Bethan. (1999). The organisation of knowledge in British university tutorial discourse: Issues, pedagogic discourse strategies and disciplinary identity. Pragmatics, 9 (4), 535-565.

Berber Sardinha, Tony. (2006). Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. Computational Linguistics, 32 (2), 283-286.

Bernárdez, Enrique. (1995). Teoría y epistemología del texto. Madrid: Cátedra. Berzlánovich, Ildikó, Markus Egg and Gisela Redeker. (2008). Coherence structure and lexical cohesion

in expository and persuasive texts. Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse (pp. 19-26). Potsdam, Germany.

Beveridge, Martin and David Milward. (2003). Combining task descriptions and ontological knowledge for adaptive dialogue. In Text, Speech and Dialogue, Proceedings (Vol. 2807, pp. 341-348).

Beveridge, Michael and John Fox. (2006). Automatic generation of spoken dialogue from medical plans and ontologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39 (5), 482-499.

Beveridge, Michael, John Fox and David Milward. (2003). Speech interfaces for point-of-care guideline systems. In Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Proceedings (Vol. 2780, pp. 76-80).

Bille, Philip. (2005). A survey on tree edit distance and related problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 337 (1-3), 217-239.

Binnick, Robert. (2009). Altaic hypotaxis and the expression of rhetorical relations. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 34.

Blakemore, Diane. (2007). Or'-parentheticals, 'that is'-parentheticals and the pragmatics of reformulation. Journal of Linguistics, 43 (2), 311-339.

Blühdorn, Hardarik. (2007). Subordination and coordination in syntax, semantics and discourse: Evidence from the study of connectives. In C. Fabricius-Hansen and W. Ramm (Eds.), 'Subordination' versus 'Coordination' in Sentence and Text. (pp. to appear). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Bocaniala, Cosmin Danut. (2000). The textual idea and its relationship to discourse structure. The Annals of University “Dunarea de Jos” of Galati, Fascicle III, 2000 (1), 75-79.

Borst, Timo. (2006). Ontologien zur semantischen Auszeichnung digitaler Lernmaterialien (Technical Report). Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology: FernUniversität in Hagen, Germany.

Boscolo, P. (1995). The Cognitive Approach to Writing and Writing Instruction - a Contribution to a Critical-Appraisal. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive-Current Psychology of Cognition, 14 (4), 343-366.

Bosma, Wauter E. (2005). Extending answers using discourse structure. Proceedings of RANLP Workshop on Crossing Barriers in Text Summarization Research (pp. 2-9).

Bosma, Wauter E. (2005). Query-based summarization using Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of 15th Meeting of CLIN (pp. 29-44).

Bosma, Wauter E. (2008). Discourse oriented summarization. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede.

Bouayad-Agha, Nadjet. (2000). Using an abstract rhetorical representation to generate a variety of pragmatically congruent texts. Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'00), Student Workshop (pp. 16-22). Hong Kong.

Bouayad-Agha, Nadjet, Richard Power and Donia Scott. (2000). Can text structure be incompatible with rhetorical structure? Proceedings of International Conference in Natural Language Generation (INLG-2000) (pp. 194-200). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel.

3

Bouwer, A. (1998). An ITS for Dutch punctuation. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. 1452, pp. 224-233).

Britton, Bruce K., Shawn M. Glynn, Bonnie J. F. Meyer and M. J. Penland. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74 (1), 51-61.

Bruhn de Garavito, Joyce. (2006). Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. University of Toronto Quarterly, 75 (1), 184-186.

Burstein, Jill C., Lisa Braden-Harder, Martin Chodorow, Bruce A. Kaplan, Karen Kukich, Chi Lu, Donald A. Rock and Susanne Wolff. (2001). System and method for computer-based automatic essay scoring. United States Patent 6,181,909: Educational Testing Services.

Burstein, Jill C., Lisa Braden-Harder, Martin S. Chodorow, Bruce A. Kaplan, Karen Kukich, Chi Lu, Donald A. Rock and Susanne Wolff. (2002). System and method for computer-based automatic essay scoring. United States Patent 6,366,759: Educational Testing Service.

Burstein, Jill C., Karen Kukich, Slava Andreyev and Daniel Marcu. (2001). Towards automatic classification of discourse elements in essays. Proceedings of 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'01). Toulouse, France.

Burstein, Jill C., Karen Kukich, Susanne Wolfe, Chi Lu and Martin S. Chodorow. (1998). Enriching automated essay scoring using discourse marking. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (ACL-COLING'98) Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 15-21). Montréal, Canada.

Burstein, Jill C. and Daniel Marcu. (2003). A machine learning approach for identification of thesis and conclusion statements in student essays. Computers and the Humanities, 37 (4), 455-467.

Burstein, Jill, Daniel Marcu and Kevin Knight. (2003). Finding the WRITE stuff: Automatic identification of discourse structure in student essays. Ieee Intelligent Systems, 18 (1), 32-39.

Busch, Michael. (2005). Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. Retrieved May, 2005, from http://www.linguistlist.org/issues/16/16-1688.html

Carbonel, Thiago Ianez, Sandra S. Collovini, Jorge César Coelho, Juliana Thiesen Fuchs, Lucia Helena Machado Rino and Renata Vieira. (2007). Summ-it: Um corpus anotado com informações discursivas visando à sumarização automática. Proceedings of XXVII Congresso da SBC: V Workshop em Tecnologia da Informação e da Linguagem Humana – TIL (pp. 1605-1614). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Carbonel, Thiago Ianez, E.R.M. Seno, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo, Jorge César Coelho, Sandra S. Collovini, Lucia Helena Machado Rino and Renata Vieira. (2006). A two-step summarizer of Brazilian Portuguese texts. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information and Human Language Technology (TIL). Ribeirão Preto-SP, Brazil.

Carenini, Giuseppe, Fabio Pianesi, Marco Ponzi and Oliviero Stock. (1993). Natural language generation and hypertext access. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 7 (2), 135-164.

Carenini, Giuseppe, Marco Ponzi and Oliviero Stock. (1990). Combining natural language and hypermedia as new means for information access. Proceedings of Fifth European Conference of Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE '90). Urbino, Italy.

Carlson, Lynn, John Conroy, Daniel Marcu, Dianne O'Leary, Mary Ellen Okurowski, Anthony Taylor and William Wong. (2001). An empirical study of the relation between abstracts, extracts, and the discourse structure of texts. Proceedings of Document Understanding Conference (DUC-2001). New Orleans, Louisiana.

Carlson, Lynn and Daniel Marcu. (2001). Discourse Tagging Manual. Unpublished manuscript, http://www.isi.edu/~marcu/discourse/tagging-ref-manual.pdf.

Carlson, Lynn, Daniel Marcu and Mary Ellen Okurowski. (2001). Building a discourse tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of 2nd SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Eurospeech 2001. Aalborg, Denmark.

Carlson, Lynn, Daniel Marcu and Mary Ellen Okurowski. (2002). RST Discourse Treebank, LDC2002T07 [Corpus]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.

4

Carlson, Lynn, Daniel Marcu and Mary Ellen Okurowski. (2003). Building a discourse tagged corpus in the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory. In J. van Kuppevelt and R. Smith (Eds.), Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 85-112). Berlin: Springer.

Caro, S. and A. Bisseret. (1997). Using weakening paralinguistic organizers in electronic documents: an experimental approach. Travail Humain, 60 (4), 409-437.

Cassell, Justine, Yukiko Nakano, Timothy W. Bickmore, Candace L. Sidner and Charles Rich. (2001). Non-verbal cues for discourse structure. Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 17-19). Toulouse, France.

Cawsey, Alison. (1990). Generating explanatory discourse. In R. Dale, C. Mellish and M. Zock (Eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation (pp. 75-101). London: Academic Press.

Cawsey, Alison. (1991). Using plausible inference rules in description planning. Proceedings of 5th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'91) (pp. 119-124). Berlin, Germany.

Cawsey, Alison. (1995). Participating in Explanatory Dialogues - Interpreting and Responding to Questions in Context - Moore,Jd. Computational Linguistics, 21 (3), 422-424.

Chafai, N. E., C. Pelachaud, D. Pele and G. Breton. (2006). Gesture expressivity modulations in an ECA application. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, Proceedings (Vol. 4133, pp. 181-192).

Chafe, Wallace. (1996). Beyond beads on a string and branches on a tree. In A. E. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 49-65). Stanford, CA: CSLI.

Chafe, Wallace. (2002). Searching for meaning in language - A memoir. Historiographia Linguistica, 29 (1-2), 245-261.

Chan, S. W. K. (2000). Using heterogeneous linguistic knowledge in local coherence identification for information retrieval. Journal of Information Science, 26 (5), 313-328.

Chan, S. W. K. (2004). Automatic discourse structure detection using shallow textual continuity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61 (1), 138-164.

Chan, S. W. K. (2006). Beyond keyword and cue-phrase matching: A sentence-based abstraction technique for information extraction. Decision Support Systems, 42 (2), 759-777.

Chan, Samuel W. K., Tom B. Y. Lai, W. J. Gao and Benjamin K. T'sou. (2000). Mining discourse markers for Chinese textual summarization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the NAACL-ANLP Workshop on Automatic Text Summarization, Seattle, WA.

Cheng, Hua. (2000). Experimenting with the interaction between aggregation and text structuring. Proceedings of ANLP-NAACL 2000 Student Research Workshop (pp. 1-6). Seattle, Washington.

Cheng, Hua and Chris Mellish. (2000). Capturing the interaction between aggregation and text planning in two generation systems. Proceedings of First International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG'00) (pp. 186-193). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel.

Chiarcos, Christian and Olga Krasavina. (2005). Rhetorical distance revisited: A pilot study. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2005. Birmingham, UK.

Chiarcos, Christian and Olga Krasavina. (2008). Rhetorical distance revisited: A parametrized approach. In A. Benz and P. Kühnlein (Eds.), Constraints in Discourse (pp. 97–115). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Chiarcos, Christian and Manfred Stede. (2004). Salience-driven text planning. In Natural Language Generation. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Natural Language Generation (pp. 21-30). Berlin: Springer.

Chotimongkol, Ananlada. (2008). Learning the structure of task-oriented conversations from the corpus of in-domain dialogs. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

Chuang, W. T. and J. Yang. (2000). Text summarization by sentence segment extraction using machine learning algorithms. In Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Proceedings (Vol. 1805, pp. 454-457).

Cornish, Francis. (1989). Discourse structure and anaphora: Written and conversational English (review article). Lingua, 79 (2-3), 229-243.

5

Cornish, Francis. (2009). Le rôle des anaphores dans la mise en place des relations de cohérence dans le discours: l'hypothèse de J.R. Hobbs. Journal of French Language Studies, 19 (2), 159-181.

Cornish, Francis. (2009). Relations de cohérence et fonctionnement des anaphores (RCFA) (Présentation). Journal of French Language Studies, 19 (2), 151-157.

Corston, Simon and Miguel Cardoso de Campos. (2000). Automatically recognizing the discourse structure of a body of text. United States Patent 6,112,168: Microsoft Corporation.

Corston-Oliver, Simon. (1998). Beyond string matching and cue phrases: Improving efficiency and coverage in discourse analysis. Proceedings of AAAI 1998 Spring Symposium Series, Intelligent Text Summarization (pp. 9-15). Madison, Wisconsin.

Corston-Oliver, Simon. (1998). Identifying the linguistic correlates of rhetorical relations. Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers, COLING/ACL '98 (pp. 8-14).

Corston-Oliver, Simon. (2000). Using decision trees to select the grammatical relation of a noun phrase. Proceedings of 1st SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. Hong Kong.

Corston-Oliver, Simon and William B Dolan. (1999). Less is more: Eliminating index terms from subordinate clauses. Proceedings of 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'99) (pp. 349-356). College Park, Maryland.

Cox, Richard, Michael O'Donnell and Jon Oberlander. (1999). Dynamic versus static hyperedia in museum education: An evaluation of ILEX the Intelligent Labelling Explorer. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AI-ED99) (pp. 181-188). Le Mans, France.

Creswell, Cassandre, Katherine Forbes, Eleni Miltsakaki, Rashmi Prasad, Aravind K. Joshi and Bonnie Webber. (2002). The discourse anaphoric properties of connectives. Proceedings of 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC). Lisbon, Portugal.

Creswell, Cassandre, Katherine Forbes, Eleni Miltsakaki, Rashmi Prasad, Aravind K. Joshi and Bonnie Webber. (2003). Penn Discourse Treebank: Building a Large Scale Annotated Corpus Encoding DLTAG-based Discourse Structure and Discourse Relations. Unpublished manuscript, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Cristea, Dan. (2000). An incremental discourse parser architecture. In Natural Language Processing - NLP 2000: Second International Conference (pp. 162-175). Patras, Greece: Springer.

Cristea, Dan. (2003). The relationship between discourse structure and referentiality in Veins Theory. In W. Menzel and C. Vertan (Eds.), Natural Language Processing between Linguistic Inquiry and System Engineering. Iasi, Romania: A.I. Cuza University Publishing House.

Cristea, Dan. (2005). Motivations and implications of Veins Theory. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Natural Language Understanding and Cognitive Science (pp. 32-44). Miami, FL.

Cristea, Dan, Nancy Ide and Daniel Marcu. (1999). Proceedings of ACL Workshop on the Relation of Discourse/Dialogue Structure and Reference. College Park, MD: ACL.

Cristea, Dan, Nancy Ide, Daniel Marcu and Valentin Tablan. (2000). Discourse structure and coreference: An empirical study. The 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'00) (pp. 208-214). Saarbrücken, Germany.

Cristea, Dan, Nancy Ide and Laurent Romary. (1998). Veins Theory: A model of global discourse cohesion and coherence. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (ACL-98/COLING-98) (pp. 281-285). Montréal, Canada.

Cristea, Dan, O. Postolache and L. Pistol. (2005). Summarisation through discourse structure. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (Vol. 3406, pp. 632-644).

Cristea, Dan and Bonnie Webber. (1997). Expectations in incremental discourse processing. Proceedings of 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'97) (pp. 88-95). Madrid, Spain.

Cui, Songren. (1986). A Comparison of English and Chinese Expository Rhetorical Structures. Unpublished Master's thesis, UCLA.

6

Dahlgren, Kathleen. (1998). Lexical marking and the recovery of discourse structure. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 65-71). Montréal, Canada.

Dale, Robert. (1991). The role of punctuation in discourse structure. Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium on Discourse Structure in Natural Language Understanding and Generation (pp. 13-14). Asilomar, CA.

Dale, Robert, Eduard Hovy, Dietmar Rösner and Oliviero Stock (Eds.). (1992). Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation. Berlin: Springer.

Dale, Robert, Chris Mellish and Michael Zock (Eds.). (1990). Current Research in Natural Language Generation. London: Academic Press.

Dale, Robert, Jon Oberlander, Maria Milosavljevic and Alistair Knott. (1998). Integrating Natural Language Generation and Hypertext to produce dynamic documents. Interacting with Computers, 11 (2), 109-135.

Dalianis, H. (1992). A Method for Validating a Conceptual-Model by Natural-Language Discourse Generation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 593, 425-444.

Dalianis, H. (1999). Aggregation in natural language generation. Computational Intelligence, 15 (4), 384-414.

Danlos, Laurence. (2006). Capacité générative forte de RST, SDRT et des DAG de dépendances pour le discours. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 47 (2), 169-198.

Danlos, Laurence. (2007). D-STAG: A discourse formalism using synchronous TAG. In M. Aunargue, K. Korta and J. M. Larrazabal (Eds.), Language, Representation and Reasoning. Bilbao, Spain: University of the Basque Country Press.

Danlos, Laurence. (2007). D-STAG: un formalisme pour le discours basé sur les TAG synchrones. Proceedings of Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles 2007 (pp. 389-398). Toulousse, France.

Danlos, Laurence and Guy Lapalme. (1999). What is a rhetorical relation? An experiment combining two text generators. Proceedings of AISB Workshop on Reference Architecture and Data Standards for Natural Language Processing (pp. 1-7). Edinburgh, UK.

Daradoumis, Thanasis. (1996). Towards a representation of the rhetorical structure of interrupted exchanges. In G. Adorni and M. Zock (Eds.), Trends in Natural Language Generation: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective (pp. 106-124). Berlin: Springer.

Dargnat, Mathilde. (2008). Constructionnalité des parataxes conditionnelles. In J. Durand, B. Habert and B. Laks (Eds.), Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française - CMLF'08. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française.

Daumé, Hal, III and Daniel Marcu. (2002). A noisy-channel model for document compression. Proceedings of 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02) (pp. 449-456). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

de Carolis, Berardina. (1998). Introducing reactivity in adaptive Hypertext generation. Proceedings of 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'98) (pp. 682-683). Brighton, UK.

de Carolis, Berardina. (1999). Generating mixed-initiative Hypertexts: A reactive approach. Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'99) (pp. 71-78). Los Angeles, California.

de Carolis, Berardina, Catherine Pelachaud and Isabella Poggi. (2000). Verbal and nonverbal discourse planning. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Workshop on Achieving Human-Like Behaviour in Interactive Animated Agents. Barcelona, Spain.

de Rosis, F., Floriana Grasso and D. C. Berry. (1999). Refining instructional text generation after evaluation. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 17 (1), 1-36.

De Silva, Nishadi. (2005). A narrative approach to technical document construction. Proceedings of PREP 2005. Lancaster, United Kingdom.

De Silva, Nishadi. (2007). A Narrative-Based Collaborative Writing Tool for Constructing Coherent Technical Documents. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southampton.

7

De Silva, Nishadi and Peter Henderson. (2005). Computer support for narrative structures. Proceedings of Computers and Writing 2005. Stanford University, CA.

De Silva, Nishadi and Peter Henderson. (2005). Narrative support for technical documents: Formalising Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS). Miami, Fl.

De Silva, Nishadi and Peter Henderson. (2007). Narrative-based writing for coherent technical documents. Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication (pp. 208-215). El Paso, TX.

De Silva, Nishadi and Hala Skaf-Molli. (2006). Narratives to preserve coherence in collaborative writing. Proceedings of The Eighth International Workshop on Collaborative Editing Systems. Banff, Canada.

Degand, Liesbeth. (1998). On classifying connectives and coherence relations. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 29-35). Montréal, Canada.

Degand, Liesbeth. (2000). Causal connectives or causal prepositions? Discursive constraints. Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (6), 687-707.

Degand, Liesbeth, Nathalie Lefévre and Yves Bestgen. (1999). The impact of connectives and anaphoric expressions on expository discourse comprehension. Document Design, 1 (1), 39-51.

Degand, Liesbeth and Ted Sanders. (2002). The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing, 15 (7-8), 739-758.

Delin, Judy and John Bateman. (2002). Describing and critiquing multimodal documents. Document Design, 3 (2), 140-155.

Delin, Judy, Anthony Hartley, Cécile Paris, Donia Scott and Keith Vander Linden. (1994). Expressing procedural relationships in multilingual instructions. Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 7) (pp. 61-70). Kennebunkport, Maine.

Delin, Judy, Anthony Hartley and Donia Scott. (1996). Towards a contrastive pragmatics: Syntactic choice in English and French instructions. Language Sciences, 18 (3-4), 897-931.

Delin, Judy, Donia Scott and Anthony Hartley. (1996). Language-specific mappings from semantics to syntax. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96) (Vol. 1, pp. 292-297). Copenhagen, Denmark.

den Ouden, Hanny. (2004). Prosodic Realizations of Text Structure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tilburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

den Ouden, Hanny, Leo Noordman and Jacques Terken. (2002). The prosodic realization of organisational features of text. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002. Aix-en-Provence, France.

den Ouden, Hanny, Carel van Wijk, Jacques Terken and Leo Noordman. (1998). Reliability of Discourse Structure Annotation (No. 33, Annual Progress Report). Eindhoven: IPO Center for Research on User-System Interaction, Technical University of Eindhoven.

Di Eugenio, Barbara, Johanna D Moore and Massimo Paolucci. (1997). Learning features that predict cue usage. Proceedings of 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'97) (pp. 80-87). Madrid, Spain.

Dipper, Stefanie and Manfred Stede. (2006). Disambiguating potential connectives. Proceedings of KONVENS-06 (pp. 167-173).

Dobes, Z. and H. J. Novak. (1991). From Knowledge Structures to Text Structures. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 546, 670-684.

Druon, Sébastien. (2000). Projet du Taxonomie des Connecteurs du Français pour le Traitement Automatique: L'exemple des Consécutifs. Unpublished Master's thesis, Université Michel de Montaigne, Bordeaux, France.

Druon, Sébastien. (2001). Approche Exploratoire de le Relation de Consequence: Description et Implementation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Université Toulouse le Mirail, Toulouse, France.

Egg, Markus and Gisela Redeker. (2008). Underspecified discourse representation. In A. Benz and P. Kühnlein (Eds.), Constraints in Discourse (pp. 117-138). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

8

Egg, Markus and Gisela Redeker. (2010). How complex is discourse structure? Proceedings of the 7th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). Malta.

Eklund, Peter and Rudolf Wille. (1998). A multimodal approach to term extraction using a Rhetorical Structure Theory tagger and formal concept analysis. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Co-operative Multimodal Communication: Theory and Applications (pp. 171-175). Tilburg, Netherlands.

Elhadad, Michael. (1995). Using argumentation in text generation. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 189-220. Elson, D. K. (2004). Categorization of narrative semantics for use in generative multidocument

summarization. In Natural Language Generation: Proceedings (Vol. 3123, pp. 192-197). Endres-Niggemeyer, B. (1994). Summarizing Text for Intelligent Communication - Results of the

Dagstuhl Seminar. Knowledge Organization, 21 (4), 213-223. Endres-Niggemeyer, B. (2000). SimSum: an empirically founded simulation of summarizing. Information

Processing and Management, 36 (4), 659-682. Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine and Bergljot Behrens. (2001). Elaboration and related discourse relations

viewed from an interlingual perspective (Reports of the project Languages in Contrast No. 13): University of Oslo.

Favero, E. L. and J. Robin. (2001). Using OLAP and data mining for content planning in natural language generation. In Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (Vol. 1959, pp. 164-175).

Fawcett, Robin P. and Bethan L. Davies. (1992). Monologue as a turn in dialogue: Towards an integration of Exchange Structure and Rhetorical Structure Theory. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rösner and O. Stock (Eds.), Aspects of Automated Language Generation (pp. 151-166). Berlin: Springer.

Fawcett, Robin P., Anita van der Mije and Carla van Wissen. (1988). Towards a systemic flowchart model for discourse structure. In R. P. Fawcett and D. J. Young (Eds.), New Developments in Systemic Linguistics. Volume 2: Theory and Applications (pp. 116-143). London: Pinter.

Fellbaum, C., U. Hahn and B. Smith. (2006). Towards new information resources for public health - From WordNet to MedicalWordNet. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 39 (3), 321-332.

Ferraresi, Gisella. (2009). Transformation in coherence strategies of the Germans on the example of adverb connectors. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, 75 (2), 133-157.

Fischer, Marcus, Elisabeth Maier and Adelheit Stein. (1994). Generating cooperative system responses in information retrieval dialogues. Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 7) (pp. 207-216). Kennebunkport, Maine.

Forbes, Katherine, Eleni Miltsakaki, Rashmi Prasad, Anoop Sarkar, Aravind K. Joshi and Bonnie Webber. (2001). D-LTAG system - Discourse parsing with a lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar. Proceedings of ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics. Helsinki, Finland.

Forbes, Katherine and Bonnie Webber. (2002). A semantic account of adverbials as discourse connectives. Proceedings of 3rd SIGDial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Foster, Robert. (2009). Improving the output from software that generates multiple choice question (MCQ) test items automatically using Controlled Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing. Borovets, Bulgaria.

Fox, Barbara A. (1987). Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fraser, Bruce. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31 (7), 931-952. Fuchs, Juliana Thiesen. (2008). Summ-it: Relatório de Anotação RST (Technical Report NILC-TR-08-02).

São Carlos: Série de Relatórios Técnicos do NILC. Fuchs, Juliana Thiesen and Maria Eduarda Giering. (2008). A importância da consideração de aspectos

funcionais do texto para a eficiência de análises RST. Revista Intercâmbio, XVII, in press. Fukumoto, Jun'ichi and Jun'ichi Tsujii. (1994). Breaking down rhetorical relations for the purpose of

analysing discourse structures. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 1177-1183). Kyoto, Japan.

Fuller, Daniel P. (1959). The Inductive Method of Bible Study. Pasadena: Fuller Theological Seminary.

9

Furtado, A. L. and A. E. M. Ciarlini. (2001). Generating narratives from plots using schema information. In Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (Vol. 1959, pp. 17-29).

Furugori, T., R. Lin, T. Ito and D. Han. (2003). Information extraction and summarization for newspaper articles on sassho-jiken. Ieice Transactions on Information and Systems, E86D (9), 1728-1735.

Gallardo, S. (2005). Pragmatic support of medical recommendations in popularized texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (6), 813-835.

Garcea, A. and C. Bazzanella. (1999). Textual links and the functions of discourse particles in Aulus Gellius's 'Noctes atticae'. Lingua E Stile, 34 (3), 403-430.

Garrido Medina, Joaquín. (2005). La persuasión en las cartas al director: Estructura de discurso, proceso de resumen y evaluación de estructuras retóricas. Llengua Societat i Comunicació, 3, 31-46.

Gawryjolek, Jakub J. (2009). Automated annotation and visualization of rhetorical figures. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo.

Georg, Gersende, Hugo Hernault, Marc Cavazza, Helmut Prendiger and Mitsuru Ishizuka. (2009). Analysing clinical guidelines' content with deontic and rhetorical structures. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (pp. 86-90). Verona, Italy.

Georg, Gersende, Hugo Hernault, Marc Cavazza, Helmut Prendiger and Mitsuru Ishizuka. (2009). From rhetorical structures to document structure: Shallow pragmatic analysis for document engineering. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (pp. 185-192). Munich, Germany.

Ghorbel, Hatem, Azfal Ballim and Giovanni Coray. (2001). ROSETTA: Rhetorical and Semantic Environment for Text Alignment. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001 (pp. 224-233). Lancaster, UK.

Giering, Maria Eduarda. (2007). O texto como sistema aberto e a configuração prototípica de artigos de opinião autorais. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 7 (1), 27-44.

Giering, Maria Eduarda. (2007). Organização retórica do artigo de opinião autoral: configuração prototípica. Circulo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 29, 3-21.

Gil, Y. and V. Ratnakar. (2002). TRELLIS: An interactive tool for capturing information analysis and decision making. In Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Proceedings (pp. 37-42).

Glanzberg, M. (2002). Context and discourse. Mind & Language, 17 (4), 333-375. Gómez-González, María de los Ángeles and Maite Taboada. (2005). Coherence relations in Functional

Discourse Grammar. In J. L. Mackenzie and M. d. l. Á. Gómez-González (Eds.), Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar (pp. 227-259). Berne: Peter Lang.

González Melón, Eva. (2006). Review of: Taboada, M. (2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion. ITL, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 151, 119-122.

González, Montserrat. (2005). Pragmatic markers and discourse coherence relations in English and Catalan oral narrative. Discourse Studies, 7 (1), 53-86.

Goutsos, Dionysis. (1996). A model of sequential relations in expository text. Text, 16 (4), 501-533. Grabski, M. and M. Stede. (2006). Bei: Intraclausal coherence relations illustrated with a German

preposition. Discourse Processes, 41 (2), 195-219. Granville, Robert Alan. (1990). The role of underlying structure in text generation. Proceedings of

International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 105-111). Dawson, Pennsylvania. Granville, Robert Alan. (1993). An algorithm for high-level organization of multi-paragraph texts.

Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 19-22). Columbus, Ohio.

Grasso, Floriana. (1999). Playing with RST: Two algorithms for the automated manipulation of discourse trees. Proceedings of Text, Speech and Dialoge 2nd International Workshop (pp. 357-360). Plzen, Czech Republic.

Grasso, Floriana. (2002). Towards a framework for rhetorical argumentation. Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (EDILOG-2002) (pp. 53-60). Edinburgh, UK.

Grasso, Floriana. (2002). Towards computational rhetoric. Informal Logic, 22 (3), 195-229.

10

Grasso, Floriana. (2003). Rhetorical coding of health promotion dialogues. In M. Dojat, E. Keravnou and P. Barahona (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe, AIME 2003 (pp. 179-188). Berlin: Springer.

Grasso, Floriana, A. Cawsey and R. Jones. (2000). Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53 (6), 1077-1115.

Green, Nancy. (2010). Representation of argumentation in text with Rhetorical Structure Theory. Argumentation, to appear.

Green, Nancy and Sandra Carberry. (1992). Conversational implicatures in indirect replies. Proceedings of 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'92) (pp. 64-71). Newark, Delaware.

Green, Nancy and Sandra Carberry. (1994). A hybrid reasoning model for indirect answers. Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 58-65). Las Cruces, New Mexico.

Green, Nancy and Sandra Carberry. (1999). Interpreting and generating indirect answers. Computational Linguistics, 25 (3), 389-435.

Green, Nancy, Giuseppe Carenini, S. Kerpedjiev, J. Mattis, Johanna D Moore and S. F. Roth. (2004). AutoBrief: An experimental system for the automatic generation of briefings in integrated text and information graphics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61 (1), 32-70.

Grimes, Joseph E. (1975). The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton. Grommes, Patrick. (2005). Prinzipien kohärenter Kommunikation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,

Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin. Grosz, Barbara J. and Candace L. Sidner. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse.

Computational Linguistics, 12 (3), 175-204. Grote, Brigitte, Eli Hagen, Adelheit Stein and Elke Teich. (1997). Speech production in human-machine

dialogue: A Natural Language Generation perspective. In E. Maier, M. Mast and S. Luperfoy (Eds.), Dialogue Processing in Spoken Language Systems (pp. 70-85). Berlin: Springer.

Grote, Brigitte, Nils Lenke and Manfred Stede. (1997). Ma(r)king concessions in English and German. Discourse Processes, 24, 87-117.

Grote, Brigitte and Manfred Stede. (1998). Discourse marker choice in sentence planning. Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 9) (pp. 128-137). Niagra-on-the-Lake, Canada.

Groza, Tudor, Siegfried Handschuh, Knud Moeller and Stefan Decker. (2007). SALT - Semantically Annotated LaTeX for scientific publications. Proceedings of the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC 2007) (pp. 518-532). Innsbruck, Austria.

Groza, Tudor, Hak Lae Kim and Siegfried Handschuh. (2006). SALT: Enriching LATEX with semantic annotations. Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006). Athens, Ga.

Groza, Tudor, Knud Möller, Siegfried Handschuh, Diana Trif and Stefan Decker. (2007). SALT: Weaving the claim web. Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2007) (pp. 197-210). Busan, Korea.

Groza, Tudor, Alexander Schutz and Siegfried Handschuh. (2007). SALT: A semantic approach for generating document representation. Proceedings of 7th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (pp. 171-173). Winnipeg, MA.

Gruber, Helmut and Peter Muntigl. (2005). Generic and rhetorical structures of texts: Two sides of the same coin? Folia Linguistica, 39 (1-2), 75-113.

Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg and Ron Zacharski. (1988). On the generation and interpretation of demonstrative expressions. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'88) (Vol. 1, pp. 216-221). Budapest, Hungary.

Gurr, C. A. (1997). Knowledge engineering in the communication of information for safety critical systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, 12 (3), 249-270.

11

Hachey, Ben and Claire Grover. (2004). A rhetorical status classifier for legal text summarisation. Proceedings of Text Summarization Branches Out Workshop, 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Barcelona, Spain.

Haddow, Barry. (2005). Acquiring a Disambiguation Model for Discourse Connectives. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

Hagen, Eli. (1999). An approach to mixed initiative spoken information retrieval dialogue. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 9 (1-2), 167-213.

Hagen, Eli, Adelheit Stein and John Bateman. (1994). The Extension of a Rhetorical Component for the `Speak!' Dialogue System (COPERNICUS Project 10393; Deliverable R3.2.2). Darmstadt, Germany: GMD/Institut für Integrierte Publikations- und Informationssysteme.

Hahn, Udo. (2002). The theory and practice of discourse parsing and summarization. Computational Linguistics, 28 (1), 81-83.

Haller, S. (1999). An introduction to interactive discourse processing from the perspective of plan recognition and text planning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 13 (4), 259-311.

Hannay, Mike and Kees Hengeveld. (2009). Functional Discourse Grammar: pragmatic aspects. In F. Brisard, J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren (Eds.), Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics (pp. 91-116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hannay, Mike and Caroline Kroon. (2005). Acts and the relationship between discourse and grammar. Functions of Language, 12 (1), 87–124.

Hanneforth, Thomas, Silvan Heintze and Manfred Stede. (2003). Rhetorical parsing with underspecification and forests. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003. Edmonton, Canada.

Haouam, Kamel and Fahri Marir. (2003). SEMIR: Semantic indexing and retrieving web document using Rhetorical Structure Theory. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (IDEAL 2003) (Vol. 2690, pp. 596-604). Hong Kong.

Haouam, Kamel and Fahri Marir. (2006). A dynamic weight assignment approach for index terms. Journal of Computer Science, 2 (3), 261-268.

Haouam, Kamel, A. Touir and Fahri Marir. (2003). Towards a framework design of a retrieval document system based on Rhetorical Structure Theory and cue phrases. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Trends in Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining (IIS2003). Poland.

Harabagiu, Sanda. (1999). From lexical cohesion to textual coherence: A data driven perspective. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 13 (2), 247-265.

Harabagiu, Sanda and Steven Maiorano. (1999). Knowledge-lean coreference resolution and its relation to textual cohesion and coherence. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on The Relation of Discourse/Dialogue Structure and Reference (pp. 29-38). College Park, Maryland.

Hartley, Anthony and Cécile Paris. (1997). Multilingual Document Production From Support for Translating to Support for Authoring. Machine Translation, 12 (1-2), 109-129.

Harvey, Terrency and Sandra Carberry. (1998). Integrating text plans for conciseness and coherence. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 512-518). Montréal, Canada.

Hearst, Marti. (1994). Multi-paragraph segmentation of expository text. Proceedings of 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'94) (pp. 9-16). Las Cruces, New Mexico.

Henderson, Peter and Nishadi De Silva. (2006). A narrative approach to collaborative writing: A business process model. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS). Paphos, Cyprus.

Hilbert, Mirco, Henning Lobin, Maja Bärenfänger, Harald Lüngen and Csilla Puskás. (2006). A text-technological approach to automatic discourse analysis of complex texts. Proceedings of KONVENS 2006.

Hirst, Graeme. (2002). Patterns of text: In honour of Michael Hoey. Computational Linguistics, 28 (4), 560-564.

Hobbs, Jerry. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 6, 67-90.

12

Hobbs, Jerry. (1985). On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse (Research Report 85-37). Stanford, CA: CSLI.

Hobbs, Jerry. (1993). An Approach to the Structure of Discourse. Unpublished manuscript, Menlo Park, California.

Hobbs, Jerry, Mark E Stickel, Douglas E Appelt and Paul Martin. (1993). Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 63, 69-142.

Holler, A. (2007). Uniform or different? - On the syntactic status of non-restrictive relative clauses. Deutsche Sprache, 35 (3), 250-270.

Hovy, Eduard. (1988). Planning coherent multisentential text. Proceedings of 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'88) (pp. 163-169). Buffalo, New York.

Hovy, Eduard. (1990). Parsimonious and profligate approaches to the question of discourse structure relations. Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Text Generation (pp. 59-65). Pittsburgh, PA.

Hovy, Eduard. (1990). Unresolved issues in paragraph planning. In R. Dale, C. Mellish and M. Zock (Eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation (pp. 17-45). London: Academic Press.

Hovy, Eduard. (1991). Recent trends in computational research on monologic discourse structure. Computational Intelligence, 7, 363-366.

Hovy, Eduard. (1992). A New Level of Language Generation Technology - Capabilities and Possibilities. IEEE Expert-Intelligent Systems & Their Applications, 7 (2), 12-17.

Hovy, Eduard. (1993). Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations. Artificial Intelligence, 63 (1-2), 341-385.

Hovy, Eduard. (1993). From interclausal relations to discourse structure- A long way behind, a long way ahead. In H. Horacek and M. Zock (Eds.), New Concepts in Natural Language Generation (pp. 57-68). London: Pinter.

Hovy, Eduard. (1995). The multifunctionality of discourse markers. Proceedings of Workshop on Discourse Markers. Egmond-aan-Zee.

Hovy, Eduard and Yigal Arens. (1991). Automatic generation of formatted text. Proceedings of 9th AAAI Conference. Anaheim, California.

Hovy, Eduard, Julia Lavid, Elisabeth Maier, Vibhu Mittal and Cécile Paris. (1992). Employing knowledge resources in a new text planning architecture. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rösner and O. Stock (Eds.), Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation (pp. 57-72). Berlin: Springer.

Hovy, Eduard and Chin Yew Lin. (1997). Automated text summarization in Summarist. Proceedings of ACL/EACL Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization (pp. 18-24). Madrid.

Hovy, Eduard and Elisabeth Maier. (1992). Parsimonious or Profligate: How Many and Which Discourse Structure Relations? (Technical Report ISI/RR-93-373.): Information Sciences Institute.

Hovy, Eduard and Elisabeth Maier. (1995). Parsimonious or Profligate: How Many and Which Discourse Structure Relations? Unpublished manuscript.

Huffman, S. B. and J. E. Laird. (1995). Flexibly instructable agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 3, 271-324.

Hulstijn, J., F. Dignum and M. Dastani. (2005). Coherence constraints for agent interaction. In Agent Communication (Vol. 3396, pp. 134-152).

Hunter, A. (2001). Hybrid argumentation systems for structured news reports. Knowledge Engineering Review, 16 (4), 295-329.

Huong, Le Thanh. (2004). Automatic Discourse Structure Generation Using Rhetorical Structure Theory. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Middlesex University, London.

Huong, Le Thanh. (2007). An approach in automatically generating discourse structure of text. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, 23 (3), 212-230.

Huong, Le Thanh and Geetha Abeysinghe. (2003). A study to improve the efficiency of a discourse parsing system. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (Vol. 2588, pp. 101-114). Berlin.

13

Huong, Le Thanh, Geetha Abeysinghe and Christian Huyck. (2003). Using cohesive devices to recognize rhetorical relations in text. Proceedings of 4th Computational Linguistics UK Research Colloquium (CLUK 4). University of Edinburgh, UK.

Hwang, S. J. J. (2005). Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson. Word-Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 56 (2), 270-277.

Ide, Nancy and Dan Cristea. (2000). A hierarchical account of referential accessibility. Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 416 - 424). Hong Kong.

Inder, Robert and Jon Oberlander. (1995). Using discourse to aid Hypertext navigation. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) (pp. 195-200). Tokyo, Japan.

Iruskieta Quintian, Mikel, Arantxa Díaz de Ilarraza Sánchez and Mikel Lersundi Ayestaran. (2009). Correlaciones en euskera entre las relaciones retóricas y los marcadores del discurso. Paper presented at the Conferencia de la Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada, Ciudad Real (Spain).

Jayez, Jacques and Corinne Rossari. (1998). Discourse relations versus discourse marker relations. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 72-78). Montréal, Canada.

Ji, P. (2006). Multi-document summarization based on unsupervised clustering. In Information Retrieval Technology, Proceedings (Vol. 4182, pp. 560-566).

Johnsen, L. (2001). Document (re)presentation: Object-orientation, visual language, and XML. Technical Communication, 48 (1), 59-65.

Jordan, Michael P. (1992). An integrated three-pronged analysis of a fund-raising letter. In W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text (pp. 171-226). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kamalski, Judith. (2007). Coherence Marking, Comprehension and Persuasion: On the Processing and Representation of Discourse. Utrecht: LOT.

Kaplan, R. B. and W. Grabe. (2002). A modem history of written discourse analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11 (3), 191-223.

Karamanis, Nikiforos. (2007). Supplementing entity coherence with local rhetorical relations for information ordering. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 16, 445-464.

Károly, Krisztina. (1998). Written text analysis: A multidisciplinary field of study. Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik, 8 (1), 71-108.

Katz, S. and D. Allbritton. (2002). Going beyond the problem given: How human tutors use post-practice discussions to support transfer. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Vol. 2363, pp. 641-650).

Katzav, J. and C. Reed. (2008). Modelling argument recognition and reconstruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (1), 155-172.

Keenan, Janice M., Susan D. Baillet and Polly Brown. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 23 (2), 115-126.

Kehler, Andrew. (1995). Interpreting Cohesive Forms in the Context of Discourse Inference. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Kehler, Andrew. (2002). Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI. Khoo, C. S. G. and J. C. Na. (2006). Semantic relations in information science. Annual Review of

Information Science and Technology, 40, 157-228. Khoo, C. S. G., S. Y. Ou and D. H. L. Goh. (2002). A hierarchical framework for multi-document

summarization of dissertation abstracts. In Digital Libraries: People, Knowledge, and Technology, Proceedings (Vol. 2555, pp. 99-110).

Kibble, Rodger. (2007). Generating coherence relations via internal argumentation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 16 (4), 387-402.

Kibble, Rodger and Richard Power. (1999). Using Centering Theory to plan coherent texts. Proceedings of the 12th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 187-192). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Kibble, Rodger and Richard Power. (2004). Optimizing referential coherence in text generation. Computational Linguistics, 30 (4), 401-416.

14

Kim, Sanghee, Rob H. Bracewell and Ken M. Wallace. (2007). Answering engineers' questions using semantic annotations. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 21 (2), 155-171.

Kittredge, R. (2002). Paraphrasing for condensation in journal abstracting. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 35 (4), 265-277.

Kittredge, Richard, Tanya Korelsky and Owen Rambow. (1991). On the need for domain communication language. Computational Intelligence, 7, 305-314.

Kleiber, Georges and Hélène Vassiliadou. (2009). Sur la relation d'Élaboration: des approches intuitives aux approches formelles. Journal of French Language Studies, 19 (2), 183-205.

Kneser, C. and R. Ploetzner. (2001). Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: observed dialogue structures and their relation to learning success. Learning and Instruction, 11 (1), 53-83.

Knott, A. (2007). Coherence in natural language: Data stuctures and applications. Computational Linguistics, 33 (4), 591-595.

Knott, A., T. Sanders and J. Oberlander. (2001). Levels of representation in discourse relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (3), 197-209.

Knott, Alistair. (1996). A Data-Driven Methodology for Motivating a Set of Coherence Relations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Knott, Alistair. (1998). Similarity and contrast relations and inductive rules. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 54-57). Montréal, Canada.

Knott, Alistair. (2001). Semantic and pragmatic relations and their intended effects. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord and W. Spooren (Eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects (pp. 127-151). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Knott, Alistair and Robert Dale. (1994). Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 18 (1), 35-62.

Knott, Alistair and Robert Dale. (1996). Choosing a set of coherence relations for text generation: A data-driven approach. In G. Adorni and M. Zock (Eds.), Trends in Natural Language Generation: an Artificial Intelligence Perspective (pp. 47-67). Berlin: Springer.

Knott, Alistair and Chris Mellish. (1996). A feature-based account of the relations signalled by sentence and clause connectives. Language and Speech, 39 (2-3), 143-183.

Knott, Alistair, Jon Oberlander, Michael O'Donnell and Chris Mellish. (2001). Beyond elaboration: The interaction of relations and focus in coherent text. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord and W. Spooren (Eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects (pp. 181-196). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Knott, Alistair and Ted Sanders. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 135-175.

Kong, Kenneth C. C. (1998). Are simple business request letters really simple? A comparison of Chinese and English business request letters. Text, 18 (1), 103-141.

Korelsky, Tanya and Richard Kittredge. (1993). Towards stratification of RST. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 52-55). Ohio State University.

Kosseim, Leila and Guy Lapalme. (1994). Content and rhetorical status selection in instructional texts. Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 53-60). Kennebunkport, Maine.

Kosseim, Leila and Guy Lapalme. (2000). Choosing rhetorical structures to plan instructional texts. Computational Intelligence, 16 (3), 408-445.

Krasavina, Olga. (2004). Use of the third-person pronouns and rhetorical structure: A corpus-oriented study. Proceedings of 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2004). Lisbon, Portugal.

Krifka-Dobes, Zuzana and Hans-Joachim Novak. (1993). From constituent planning to text planning. In H. Horacek and M. Zock (Eds.), New Concepts in Natural Language Generation: Planning, Realization, and Systems (pp. 87-113). London: Pinter.

15

Kuperberg, Gina R., Balaji M. Lakshmanan, David N. Caplan and Phillip J Holcomb. (2006). Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences. NeuroImage, 33 (1), 343-361.

Kurohashi, Sadao and Makoto Nagao. (1994). Automatic detection of discourse structure by checking surface information in sentences. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'94) (Vol. 1, pp. 1123-1127). Kyoto, Japan.

Kuronen, M. L., J. Tienari and E. Vaara. (2005). The merger storm recognizes no borders: An analysis of media rhetoric on a business manoeuvre. Organization, 12 (2), 247-273.

Lagerwerf, Luuk. (1998). Causal Connectives Have Presuppositions: Effects on Coherence and Discourse Structure. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

Lagerwerf, Luuk, L. Cornelis, J. de Geus and P. Jansen. (2008). Advance organizers in advisory reports - Selective reading, recall, and perception. Written Communication, 25 (1), 53-75.

Lagerwerf, Luuk, Wilbert Spooren and Liesbeth Degand. (2006). Surface cues of content and tenor in texts - Introduction. Discourse Processes, 41 (2), 111-116.

Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher. (1991). Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. Proceedings of 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'91) (pp. 55-62). Berkeley, California.

Lascarides, Alex and Nicholas Asher. (1993). Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16 (5), 437-493.

Lascarides, Alex, Nicholas Asher and Jon Oberlander. (1992). Inferring discourse relations in context. Proceedings of 30th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1-8). Newark, Delaware.

Lascarides, Alex and Jon Oberlander. (1993). Temporal coherence and defeasible knowledge. Theoretical Linguistics, 19, 1-37.

Lavid, Julia and Maite Taboada. (2004). Stylistic differences in document design across languages in Europe: A cross-linguistic characterization. Journal of Technical Writing and Communications, 34 (1-2), 43-65.

Le Draoulec, A. and M. P. Pery-Woodley. (2005). Temporal management and discourse relations. Langue Francaise (148), 45-+.

Le, E. (2003). Information sources as a persuasive strategy in editorials - Le Monde and the New York times. Written Communication, 20 (4), 478-510.

Le, Huong T and Geetha Abeysinghe. (2003). A study to improve the efficiency of a discourse parsing system. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (Vol. 2588, pp. 101-114). Berlin.

Lindley, Craig, Jim Davis, Frank Nack and Lloyd Rutledge. (2001). The Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory to Interactive News Program Generation from Digital Archives (Technical Report No. INS-R0101). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica.

Litman, Diane J. and Rebecca Passonneau. (1995). Combining multiple knowledge sources for discourse segmentation. Proceedings of 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'95) (pp. 108-115). Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Longacre, Robert E. (1976). An Anatomy of Speech Notions. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press. Longacre, Robert E. (1983). The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum. Lorenz, Gunter. (1999). Learning to cohere: Causal links in native vs. non-native argumentative writing.

In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk and E. Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse: How to Create It and How to Describe It (pp. 56-75). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Louwerse, Max M. (2001). An analytic and cognitive parametrization of coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (3), 291-315.

Lüngen, Harald, Maja Bärenfänger, Mirco Hilbert, Henning Lobin and Csilla Puskás. (2006). Text parsing of a complex genre. Proceedings ELPUB2006 Conference on Electronic Publishing (pp. 247-256). Bankso, Bulgaria.

16

Madjid, I., C. Stephane and M. Daniel. (2003). The effect of individual differences on searching the Web. In Asist 2003: Proceedings of the 66th Asist Annual Meeting, Vol 40, 2003 (Vol. 40, pp. 240-246).

Mahlow, Morris. (2006). Entwicklung und Vergleich von zwei Verfahren zur Auswertung von deutschen Freitextkommentaren. Unpublished Diplomarbeit, Universität Potsdam, Potsdam.

Maier, Elisabeth. (1991). Zwei Texttheorien in neuem Licht - RST und GSP fuers Abstracting. Paper presented at the Workshop Textzusammenfassen at the yearly GAL conference, Mainz, Germany.

Maier, Elisabeth. (1996). Textual relations as part of multiple links between text segments. In G. Adorni and M. Zock (Eds.), Trends in Natural Language Generation: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective (pp. 68-87). Berlin: Springer.

Maier, Elisabeth and Eduard Hovy. (1991). A metafunctionally motivated taxonomy for discourse structure relations. Proceedings of 3rd European Workshop on Language Generation. Innsbruck, Austria.

Maier, Elisabeth and Eduard Hovy. (1993). Organising discourse structure relations using metafunctions. In H. Horacek and M. Zock (Eds.), New Concepts in Natural Language Generation (pp. 69-86). London: Pinter.

Maier, Elisabeth and Stefan Sitter. (1992). An extension of rhetorical structure theory for the treatment of retrieval dialogues. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 968–973). Bloomington, IN.

Mancini, Clara, Donia Scott and Simon Buckingham Shum. (2006). Visualizing discourse coherence in non-linear documents. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 47 (2), 137-168.

Mancini, Clara and Simon J. Buckingham Shum. (2006). Modelling discourse in contested domains: A semiotic and cognitive framework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64 (11), 1154-1171.

Mann, William C. (1983). An Overview of the Nigel Text Generation Grammar: ISI/RR-83-113. Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.

Mann, William C. (1983). An Overview of the Penman Text Generation Grammar: ISI/RR-83-114. Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.

Mann, William C. (1999). Introducción a la Teoría de la Estructura Retórica (Rhetorical Structure Theory: RST). Unpublished manuscript.

Mann, William C. (2000). Pretty Open Questions (POQ's) about RST. Unpublished manuscript. Mann, William C. (2003). Models of intentions in language. In P. Kühnlein, H. Rieser and H. Zeevat

(Eds.), Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium (pp. 165-178). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Mann, William C. (2003). RST Web Site, from http://www.sil.org/~mannb/rst/ (Soon to be moved to: http://www.sfu.ca/rst)

Mann, William C. and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. (1991). Functions of language in two frameworks. Word, 42 (3), 231-249.

Mann, William C., Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen and Sandra A. Thompson. (1992). Rhetorical Structure Theory and text analysis. In W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text (pp. 39-78). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Mann, William C. and Maite Taboada. (2007). RST Web Site, from http://www.sfu.ca/rst Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson. (1983). Relational Propositions in Discourse (Technical

Report No. ISI/RR-83-115). Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute. Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson. (1986). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Description and

Construction of Text Sructures (Technical Report No. ISI/RS-86-174). Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute.

Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson. (1987). Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization (No. ISI/RS-87-190). Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute.

Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8 (3), 243-281.

17

Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson. (1992). Relational Discourse Structure: A comparison of approaches to structuring text by 'contrast'. In S. J. J. Hwang and W. R. Merrifield (Eds.), Language in Context: Essays for Robert E. Longacre (pp. 19-45). Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.

Mantynen, Anne Kaarina. (2003). Talking about Language: The Rhetoric of Language Columns. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.

Marcu, Daniel. (1996). Building up rhetorical structure trees. Proceedings of 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 1069-1074). Portland, Oregon.

Marcu, Daniel. (1996). Distinguishing between coherent and incoherent texts. Proceedings of Student Conference on Computational Linguistics in Montréal (pp. 136-143). Montréal, Canada.

Marcu, Daniel. (1997). From discourse structures to text summaries. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarisation (pp. 82-88). Madrid, Spain.

Marcu, Daniel. (1997). From local to global coherence: A bottom-up approach to text planning. Proceedings of 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 629-635). Providence, Rhode Island.

Marcu, Daniel. (1997). The rhetorical parsing of natural language texts. Proceedings of 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (ACL'97/EACL'97) (pp. 96-103). Madrid, Spain.

Marcu, Daniel. (1997). The Rhetorical Parsing, Summarization, and Generation of Natural Language Texts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Marcu, Daniel. (1998). Improving summarization through rhetorical parsing tuning. Proceedings of ACL 6th Workshop on Very Large Corpora (pp. 206-215). Montréal, Canada.

Marcu, Daniel. (1998). A surface-based approach to identifying discourse markers and elementary textual units in unrestricted texts. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 1-7). Montréal, Canada.

Marcu, Daniel. (1998). To build text summaries of higher quality, nuclearity is not sufficient. Proceedings of AAAI-98 Spring Symposium on Intelligent Text Summarization (pp. 1-8). Stanford, California.

Marcu, Daniel. (1999). A decision-based approach to rhetorical parsing. Proceedings of 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'99) (pp. 365-372). College Park, Maryland.

Marcu, Daniel. (1999). Discourse trees are good indicators of importance in texts. In I. Mani and M. Maybury (Eds.), Advances in Automatic Text Summarization (pp. 123-136): The MIT Press.

Marcu, Daniel. (1999). A formal and computational synthesis of Grosz and Sidner's and Mann and Thompson's theories. Proceedings of Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse (pp. 101-108). Edinburgh, Scotland.

Marcu, Daniel. (1999). Instructions for Manually Annotating the Discourse Structures of Texts. Unpublished manuscript, Marina del Rey, California.

Marcu, Daniel. (2000). Extending a formal and computational model of Rhetorical Structure Theory with intentional structures a la Grosz and Sidner. The 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'00) (Vol. 1, pp. 523-529). Saarbrücken, Germany.

Marcu, Daniel. (2000). The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: A surface based approach. Computational Linguistics, 26 (3), 395-448.

Marcu, Daniel. (2000). The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Marcu, Daniel, Lynn Carlson and Maki Watanabe. (2000). The automatic translation of discourse structures. 1st Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL'00) (pp. 9-17). Seattle, Washington.

Marcu, Daniel, Lynn Carlson and Maki Watanabe. (2000). An empirical study in multilingual Natural Language Generation: What should a text planner do? First International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG'2000) (pp. 17-23). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel.

18

Marcu, Daniel and Abdessamad Echihabi. (2002). An unsupervised approach to recognising discourse relations. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'02) (pp. 368-375). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Marcu, Daniel, Magdalena Romera and Estibaliz Amorrortu. (1999). Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging (pp. 48-57). College Park, Maryland.

Marcu, Daniel, Magdalena Romera and Estibaliz Amorrortu. (1999). Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees: Problems, annotation choices, issues. Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse (pp. 71-78). Edinburgh, UK.

Marir, Fahri and Kamel Haouam. (2002). RSTIndex: Indexing and retrieving web document using computational and linguistic techniques. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning (IDEAL 2002) (Vol. 2412, pp. 135-140). UK.

Marir, Fahri and Kamel Haouam. (2004). Rhetorical Structure Theory for content-based indexing and retrieval of Web documents. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Information Technology: Research and Education (ITRE 2004). UK.

Martin, James R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Maslennikov, Mstislav and Tat-seng Chua. (2007). A multi-resolution framework for information extraction from free text. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (pp. 592-599). Prague, Czech Republic.

Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. (2005). Remembering Bill Mann. Computational Linguistics, 31 (2), 161-172.

Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. and John Bateman. (1991). Text Generation and Systemic-Functional Linguistics: Experiences from English and Japanese. London and New York: Pinter.

Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. and Sandra A. Thompson. (1988). The structure of discourse and "subordination". In J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Clause Combining in Discourse and Grammar (pp. 275-329). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M., Licheng Zeng, Marilyn Cross, Ichiro Kobayashi, Kazuhiro Teruya and Canzhong Wu. (1998). The Multex generator and its environment: Application and development. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 228-237). Montréal, Canada.

McIlmoil, Tara. (2001). Using RST Lite to Teach Organisational Structure and Coherence (Essay). McKeown, Kathleen R. (1985). Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to

Generate Natural Language Text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. McKeown, Kathleen, Jacques Robin and Karen Kukich. (1995). Generating concise natural language

summaries. Information Processing and Management, 31 (5), 703-733. McTear, M. F. (2002). Spoken dialogue technology: Enabling the conversational user interface. Acm

Computing Surveys, 34 (1), 90-169. Mehler, A. (2002). Components of a model of context-sensitive hypertexts. Journal of Universal

Computer Science, 8 (10), 924-943. Mellish, Chris, Alistair Knott, Jon Oberlander and Michael O'Donnell. (1998). Experiments using

stochastic search for text planning. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 98-107). Niagara-on-the-lake, Canada.

Mentis, Helena M., Paula M. Bach, Blaine Hoffman, Mary Beth Rosson and John M. Carroll. (2009). Development of decision rationale in complex group decision making. Proceedings of 27th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1341-1350). Boston, MA.

Meteer, Marie. (1993). Assumptions underlying discourse relations: Which ones are really there and where are they? Proceedings of Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, ACL (pp. 82-85). Ohio State University.

Mey, J. L. (2006). Focus-on issue: The pragmatics of discourse management. Journal of Pragmatics, 38 (4), 473-474.

19

Miike, Seiji, Etsuo Itoh, Kenji Ono and Kazuo Sumita. (1994). A full-text retrieval system with a dynamic abstract generation function. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM-SIGIR Conference (pp. 152-161). Dublin, Ireland.

Millis, Keith K. and Marcel A. Just. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 128-147.

Milosavljevic, Maria and Jon Oberlander. (1998). Dynamic Hypertext catalogues: Helping users to help themselves. Proceedings of 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 123-131). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Miltsakaki, Eleni, Cassandre Creswell, Kate Forbes, Aravind K. Joshi and Bonnie Lynn Webber. (2003). Anaphoric arguments of discourse connectives: Semantic properties of antecedents versus non-antecedents. Proceedings of the Computational Treatment of Anaphora Workshop (EACL-2003). Budapest, Hungary.

Miltsakaki, Eleni and Karen Kukich. (2004). Evaluation of text coherence for electronic essay scoring systems. Natural Language Engineering, 10 (1), 25-55.

Miltsakaki, Eleni, Rashmi Prasad, Aravind K Joshi and Bonnie Webber. (2004). Annotating discourse connectives and their arguments. Proceedings of the HLT/NAACL Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation. Boston, MA.

Min, Daihwan. (2007). A survey on methods for analyzing team communication. Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management, 14 (2), 169-187.

Mizuta, Y., A. Korhonen, T. Mullen and N. Collier. (2006). Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75 (6), 468-487.

Moens, Marie-Francine. (2007). Summarizing court decisions. Information Processing and Management, 43 (6), 1748-1764.

Moens, Marie-Francine and Rik De Busser. (2002). First steps in building a model for the retrieval of court decisions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57 (5), 429-446.

Mohamed, Aysha H. and Marjzoub R. Omer. (1999). Syntax as a marker of rhetorical organization in written texts: Arabic and English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 37 (4), 291-305.

Mohamed, M. T. and C. Clifton. (2008). Processing inferential causal statements: Theoretical refinements and the role of verb type. Discourse Processes, 45 (1), 24-51.

Molina, M. and V. Flores. (2006). Generating adaptive presentations of hydrologic behavior. In Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - Ideal 2006, Proceedings (Vol. 4224, pp. 896-903).

Mooney, David, Sandra Carberry and Kathleen McCoy. (1990). The basic block model of extended explanations. Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 5) (pp. 112-119). Dawson, Pennsylvania.

Moore, Johanna D and Vibhu Mittal. (1996). Dynamically generated follow-up questions. Computer, 29 (7), 75-&.

Moore, Johanna D and Cécile Paris. (1993). Planning text for advisory dialogues: Capturing intentional and rhetorical information. Computational Linguistics, 19 (4), 651-694.

Moore, Johanna D and Martha E Pollack. (1992). A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics, 18 (4), 537-544.

Moreale, E. and M. Vargas-Vera. (2004). Semantic services in e-Learning: An argumentation case study. Educational Technology & Society, 7 (4), 112-128.

Mori, Yoshiki. (1996). Multiple discourse relations on the sentential level in Japanese. Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96) (Vol. 2, pp. 788-793). Copenhagen, Denmark.

Morris, S. J. and A. C. W. Finkelstein. (1999). Engineering via discourse: Content structure as an essential component for multimedia documents. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 9 (6), 691-724.

20

Moser, Megan and Johanna D Moore. (1995). Investigating cue selection and placement in tutorial discourse. Proceedings of 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'95) (pp. 130-135). Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Moser, Megan and Johanna D Moore. (1995). Using discourse analysis and automatic text generation to study discourse cue usage. Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation (pp. 92-98). Stanford, California.

Moser, Megan and Johanna D Moore. (1996). Towards a synthesis of two accounts of discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 22 (3), 410-419.

Muntigl, Peter and Helmut Gruber. (2005). Introduction: Approaches to genre. Folia Linguistica, 39 (1-2), 1-18.

Murray, Gabriel, Maite Taboada and Steve Renals. (2006). Prosodic correlates of rhetorical relations. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2006 Workshop on "Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech" (pp. 1-7). New York.

Myers, Jerome L., Makiko Shinjo and Susan A Duffy. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26 (4), 453-465.

Nakano, Yukiko and Tsuenaki Kato. (1998). Cue phrase selection in instruction dialogue using machine learning. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 100-106). Montréal, Canada.

Neff, M., M. Kipp, I. Albrecht and H. P. Seidel. (2008). Gesture modeling and animation based on a probabilistic re-creation of speaker style. Acm Transactions on Graphics, 27 (1).

Nicholas, Nick. (1994). Problems in the Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory to Text Generation. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

Nicholas, Nick. (1995). Parameters for Rhetorical Structure Theory ontology. University of Melbourne Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 77-93.

Nir, Bracha and Ruth A. Berman. (2010). Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (3), 744-765.

Nomoto, Tadashi. (2004). Machine Learning Approaches to Rhetorical Parsing and Open-Domain Text Summarization. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.

Nomoto, Tadashi and Yuji Matsumoto. (1999). Learning discourse relations with active data selection. Proceedings of Joint ACL-SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora (pp. 158-167). College Park, Maryland.

Noordman, Leo, Ingrid Dassen, Mar Swerts and Jacques Terken. (1999). Prosodic markers of text structure. In K. van Hoek, A. A. Kibrik and L. Noordman (Eds.), Discourse Studies in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 131-148). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Noordman, Leo and W. Vonk. (1992). Readers knowledge and the control of inferences in reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7 (3-4), 373-391.

Noordman, Leo, W. Vonk and H. Kempff. (1992). Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573-590.

Not, Elena. (1996). A computational model for generating referring expressions in a multilingual application domain. The 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96) (Vol. 2, pp. 848-853). Copenhagen, Denmark.

Not, Elena and Massimo Zancanaro. (2000). The MacroNode approach: Mediating between adaptive and dynamic hypermedia. International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Web-Based Systems (pp. 166-178). Trento, Italy.

Oates, Sarah Louise. (1999). State of the Art Report on Discourse Markers and Relations. Brighton, UK: University of Brighton, Information Technology Research Institute.

Oates, Sarah Louise. (2000). Multiple discourse marker occurrence: Creating hierarchies for Natural Language Generation. ANLP-NAACL 2000 Student Research Workshop (pp. 41-45). Seattle, Washington.

21

Oberlander, Jon and Chris Mellish. (1998). Final Report on the ILEX Project. Edinburgh, UK: Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh.

Oberlander, Jon and Johanna D Moore. (1999). Cue phrases in discourse: Further evidence for the core:Contributor distinction. Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse (pp. 87-93). Edinburgh, UK.

Oberlander, Jon and Johanna D Moore. (2001). Discourse cues: Further evidence for the core-contributor distinction. Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (3), 317-332.

O'Brien, Theresa. (1995). Rhetorical structure analysis and the case of the inaccurate, incoherent source-hopper. Applied Linguistics, 16 (4), 442-482.

O'Donnell, Michael. (1997). RST-Tool: An RST analysis tool. Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Duisburg, Germany.

O'Donnell, Michael. (2000). RSTTool 2.4: A markup tool for Rhetorical Structure Theory. First International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG'2000) (pp. 253-256). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel.

O'Donnell, Michael, Hua Cheng and Janet Hitzeman. (1998). Integrating referring and informing in NP planning. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on The Computational Treatment of Nominals (pp. 46-55). Montréal, Canada.

O'Donnell, Michael, Chris Mellish, Jon Oberlander and Alistair Knott. (2001). ILEX: An architecture for a dynamic Hypertext generation system. Natural Language Engineering, 7, 225-250.

Oishi, Akira and Yuji Matsumoto. (1998). Recognition of the coherence relation between te-linked clauses. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 990-996). Montréal, Canada.

Okazaki, N., Y. Matsuo and M. Ishizuka. (2004). Coherent arrangement of sentences extracted from multiple newspaper articles. In Pricai 2004: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings (Vol. 3157, pp. 882-891).

Olson, Michael L. (1981). Barai Clause Junctures: Toward a Functional Theory of Interclausal Relations. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Australian National University.

Ono, Kenji, Kazuo Sumita and Seiji Miike. (1994). Abstract generation based on rhetorical structure extraction. Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'94) (Vol. 1, pp. 344-348). Kyoto, Japan.

Otterbacher, Jahna, Dragomir Radev and Airong Luo. (2002). Revisions that improve cohesion in multi-document summaries: A preliminary study. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Automatic Summarization (pp. 27-36). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Ou, S. Y., C. S. G. Khoo and D. H. Goh. (2003). Multi-document summarization of dissertation abstracts using a variable-based framework. In Asist 2003: Proceedings of the 66th Asist Annual Meeting, Vol 40, 2003 (Vol. 40, pp. 230-239).

Ou, S. Y., C. S. G. Khoo and D. H. Goh. (2006). Multi-document summarization of news articles using an event-based framework. Aslib Proceedings, 58 (3), 197-217.

Pander Maat, H. (1999). The differential linguistic realization of comparative and additive coherence relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 10 (2), 147-184.

Pander Maat, Henk. (1998). Classifying negative coherence relations on the basis of linguistic evidence. Journal of Pragmatics, 30 (2), 177-204.

Pander Maat, Henk and Liesbeth Degand. (2001). Scaling causal relations and connectives in terms of speaker Involvement. Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (3), 211-245.

Pander Maat, Henk and Ted Sanders. (2001). Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empirical study of language in use. Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (3), 247-273.

Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro and Maria das Gracas Volpe Nunes. (2006). Review and evaluation of DiZer - An automatic discourse analyzer for Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Computational Processing of Written and Spoken Portuguese – PROPOR (pp. 180-189). Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.

22

Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro, Maria das Gracas Volpe Nunes and Lucia Helena Machado Rino. (2004). DiZer: An automatic discourse analyzer for Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of First International Workshop on Natural Language Understanding and Cognitive Science (NLUCS 2004). Porto, Portugal.

Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro and Lucia Helena Machado Rino. (2001). A summary planner based on a three-level discourse model. Proceedings of Natural Language Processing Pacific Rim Symposium (pp. 533-538). Tokyo, Japan.

Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro and Lucia Helena Machado Rino. (2002). DMSumm: Review and assessment. Proceedings of Advances in Natural Language Processing, Third International Conference (PorTAL 2002) (pp. 263-274). Faro, Portugal.

Paris, Cécile. (2002). Information delivery for tourism. Ieee Intelligent Systems, 17 (6), 61-63. Paris, Cécile and Donia Scott. (1994). Intentions, structure, and expression in multi-lingual instructions.

Proceedings Seventh International Conference on Natural Language Generation (pp. 45-52). Kennebunkport, ME.

Paris, Cécile, S. Wan, R. Wilkinson and M. F. Wu. (2001). Generating personal travel guides - And who wants them? In User Modeling 2001, Proceedings (Vol. 2109, pp. 251-253).

Paris, Cécile, M. F. Wu, Keith Vander Linden, M. Post and S. J. Lu. (2004). Myriad: An architecture for contextualized information retrieval and delivery. In Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, Proceedings (Vol. 3137, pp. 205-214).

Passonneau, Rebecca and Diane J. Litman. (1997). Discourse segmentation by human and automated means. Computational Linguistics, 23 (1), 103-139.

Pastra, Katerina. (2008). COSMOROE: A cross-media relations framework for modelling multimedia dialectics. Multimedia Systems, 14 (5), 299-323.

Patry, R. (1992). The Problem of Cohesive Force - Is It a Question of Distance or of Function. Linguistique, 28 (2), 17-33.

Pelsmaekers, Katja, Chris Braecke and Ronald Geluykens. (1998). Rhetorical relations and subordination in L2 writing. In A. Sánchez-Macarro and R. Carter (Eds.), Linguistic Choice across Genres: Variation in Spoken and Written English (pp. 191-213). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Peng, Gracie. (2009). Using Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) to describe the development of coherence in interpreting trainees. Interpreting, 11 (2), 216-243.

Penn Discourse Treebank. (2003). Annotation Guidelines for the Penn Discourse TreeBank (Manual). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania, Institure for Research in Cognitive Science.

Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Sentences, individual differences, and multiple texts: Three issues in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 23 (3), 337-355.

Péry-Woodley, Marie-Paule. (1998). Signalling in written text: A corpus-based approach. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 79-85). Montréal, Canada.

Péry-Woodley, Marie-Paule. (2001). Modes d'organisation et de signalisation dans des textes procéduraux. Langages, 141, 28-46.

Pianta, Emanuele and Elena Not. (1997). A Modular Text Planning Architecture for a Multilingual Setting (No. Ref. No. 9701-06). Trento, Italy: ITC-IRST.

Pineda, L. and G. Garza. (2000). A model for multimodal reference resolution. Computational Linguistics, 26 (2), 139-193.

Pisanski Peterlin, Agnes. (2006). Iskanje pragmaticnih enot v neoznacenem korpusu: primer kažipotov. Proceedings of the Fifth Slovenian and First International Language Technologies Conference. Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Pit, Mirna. (2003). How to Express Yourself with a Causal Connective: Subjectivity and Causal Connectives in Dutch, German and French. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Poesio, Massimo, Barbara Di Eugenio and Gerard Keohane. (2002). Discourse Structure and Anaphora: An Empirical Study (NLE Technical Note No. TN-02-02): University of Essex.

23

Poesio, Massimo, Amrita Patel and Barbara Di Eugenio. (2006). Discourse structure and anaphora in tutorial dialogues: An empirical analysis of two theories of global focus. Research on Language and Computation, 4, 229-257.

Polanyi, Livia. (1988). A formal model of the structure of discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 601-638. Polanyi, Livia. (1996). The Linguistic Structure of Discourse (Technical Report No. CSLI-96-200). Palo

Alto, CA: CSLI. Polanyi, Livia. (2001). The linguistic structure of discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H. E.

Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 265-281). Malden, Mass: Blackwell. Polanyi, Livia, Christopher Culy, Martin van der Berg, Gian Lorenzo Thione and David Ahn. (2004). A

rule based approach to discourse parsing. Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial Workshop in Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 108-117). Cambridge, MA.

Polanyi, Livia, Christopher Culy, Martin van der Berg, Gian Lorenzo Thione and David Ahn. (2004). Sentential structure and discourse parsing. Proceedings of the ACL 2004 Workshop on Discourse Annotation. Barcelona, Spain.

Polanyi, Livia and R. J. H. Scha. (1983). The syntax of discourse. Text, 3 (3), 261-270. Polanyi, Livia and Martin van den Berg. (1999). Logical structure and discourse anaphora resolution.

Proceedings of the Workshop on the Relation of Discourse/Dialogue Structure and Reference in the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-99) (pp. 110-118). College Park, Maryland.

Potter, Andrew. (2007). A discourse approach to explanation aware knowledge representation. In T. Roth-Berghofer, S. Schulz, D. B. Leake and D. Bahls (Eds.), Explanation-Aware Computing: Papers from the 2007 AAAI Workshop (pp. 56-63). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

Potter, Andrew. (2007). An Investigation of Interactional Coherence in Asynchronous Learning Environments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Potter, Andrew. (2008). Generating discourse-based explanations. Künstliche Intelligenz, 22 (2), 28-31. Potter, Andrew. (2008). Interactional coherence in asynchronous learning networks: A rhetorical

approach. The Internet and Higher Education, 11 (2), 87-97. Potter, Andrew. (2008). Linked and convergent structures in discourse-based reasoning. ECAI 2008

Workshop on Explanation Aware Computing (ExaCt 2008). Patras, Greece. Power, Richard, Christine Doran and Donia Scott. (1999). Generating Embedded Discourse Markers from

Rhetorical Structure (Technical Report No. ITRI-99-15). Brighton, UK: University of Brighton, Information Technology Research Institute.

Power, Richard, Donia Scott and Nadjet Bouayad-Agha. (2003). Document structure. Computational Linguistics, 29 (2), 211-260.

Prasad, Rashmi, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee, Aravind K Joshi and Bonnie Webber. (2006). Attribution and its annotation in the Penn Discourse TreeBank. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 47 (2), 43-63.

Prasad, Rashmi, Alan Lee, Nikhil Dinesh, Eleni Miltsakaki, Geraud Campion, Aravind K. Joshi and Bonnie Webber. (2008). Penn Discourse Treebank Version 2.0, LDC2008T05 [Corpus]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.

Prévot, Laurent. (2004). Structures sémantiques et pragmatiques pour la modélisation de la cohérence dans des dialogues finalisés. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse.

Prévot, Laurent, Laure Vieu and Nicholas Asher. (2009). Une formalisation plus précise pour une annotation moins confuse: la relation d'Élaboration d'entité. Journal of French Language Studies, 19 (2), 207-228.

Prust, H., R. Scha and M. Vandenberg. (1994). Discourse grammar and verb phrase anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17 (3), 261-327.

Rada, R., W. G. Wang and A. Birchall. (1993). Retrieval hierarchies in hypertext. Information Processing and Management, 29 (3), 359-371.

Radev, Dragomir. (2000). A common theory of information fusion from multiple text sources. Step one: Cross document structure. Proceedings of 1st SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 74-83). Hong Kong.

24

Radev, Dragomir, Hongyan Jing, Malgorzata Stys and Daniel Tam. (2004). Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents. Information Processing and Management, 40, 919-938.

Radev, Dragomir, Jahna Otterbacher and Zhu Zhang. (2004). CST Bank: A corpus for the study of cross-document structural relationships. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC. Lisbon, Portugal.

Rambow, Owen. (1990). Domain communication knowledge. Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 87-94). Dawson, Pennsylvania.

Rambow, Owen (Ed.). (1993). Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations. Columbus, Ohio: ACL.

Rambow, Owen. (1993). Rhetoric as knowledge. Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 102-105). Columbus, Ohio.

Ramsay, Guy. (2000). Linearity in rhetorical organisation: A comparative cross-cultural analysis of newstext from the People's Republic of China and Australia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10 (2), 241-258.

Ramsay, Guy. (2001). Rhetorical styles and newstexts: A contrastive analysis of rhetorical relations in Chinese and Australian news-journal text. E-Journal of Asian Linguistics and Language Teaching, 1 (1).

Ramsay, Guy. (2001). What are they getting at? Placement of important ideas in Chinese newstext: A contrastive analysis with Australian newstext. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 24 (2), 17-34.

Rebeyrolle, Josette, Marie-Paule Jacques and Marie-Paule Péry-Woodley. (2009). Titres et intertitres dans l'organisation du discours. Journal of French Language Studies, 39 (2), 269-290.

Redeker, Gisela. (1991). Review article: Linguistic markers of linguistic structure. Linguistics, 29 (6), 1139-1172.

Redeker, Gisela. (2000). Coherence and structure in text and discourse. In W. Black and H. Bunt (Eds.), Abduction, Belief, and Context in Dialogue. Studies in Computational Pragmatics (pp. 233-263). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Redeker, Gisela. (2006). Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 339-358). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Redeker, Gisela and Markus Egg. (2006). Says who? On the treatment of speech attributions in discourse structure. Proceedings of the Workshop “Constraints in Discourse” (pp. 140-146). Maynooth University, Ireland.

Reed, Chris and Aspassia Daskalopolu. (1998). Modelling contractual arguments. 4th International Conference on Argumentation (pp. 686-692). Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Reed, Chris and Derek Long. (1997). Generating Punctuation in Written Documents (Technical Report No. RN/97/157). London, UK: Department of Computer Science, University College.

Reed, Chris and Derek Long. (1997). Multiple subarguments in logic, argumentation, rhetoric and text generation. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Quantitative and Qualitative Practical Reasoning (pp. 496-510). Bad Honnef, Germany.

Reed, Chris and Derek Long. (1997). Persuasive dialogue. Paper presented at the OSSA Conference on Argument and Rhetoric, St. Catherine's, Canada.

Reed, Chris and Derek Long. (1998). Generating the structure of argument. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 1091-1097). Montréal, Canada.

Reitter, David. (2002). Rhetorical Theory in LaTeX with the RST Package. Unpublished manuscript, Dublin, Ireland.

Reitter, David. (2003). Rhetorical Analysis with Rich Feature Support Vector Models. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Reitter, David. (2003). Simple signals for complex rhetorics: On rhetorical analysis with rich-feature support vector models. Sprachthechnologie für die multilinguale Kommunikation. Sankt Augustin, Germany.

25

Reitter, David. (2003). Simple signals for complex rhetorics: On rhetorical analysis with rich-feature support vector models. LDV-Forum, Journal for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology, 18 (1-2), 38-52.

Reitter, David and Manfred Stede. (2003). Step by step: Underspecified markup in incremental rhetorical analysis. Proceedings of EACL 4th International Workshop on Interpreted Corpora. Budapest, Hungary.

Renkema, Jan. (2006). How to proceed with ambiguity in discourse relations? A proposal based on connectivity variables. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6 (1), 117-134.

Renkema, Jan. (2008). Relaciones discursivas y variables de conectividad. Revista Signos, 41 (66), 65-80. Renkema, Jan. (2009). The Texture of Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Rienks, Rutger. (2007). Meetings in Smart Environments: Implications of Progressing Technology.

Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. Rino, Lucia Helena Machado, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo, Carlos Nascimento Silla, Celso Antonio

Alves Kaestner and Michael Pombo. (2004). A comparison of automatic summarization systems for Brazilian Portuguese texts. Proceedings of the XVII Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (SBIA 2004). São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.

Rino, Lucia Helena Machado and Donia Scott. (1996). A Discourse Model for Gist Preservation (Technical Report No. ITRI-96-12). Brighton, UK: University of Brighton, Information Technology Research Institute.

Risselada, Rodie and Wilbert Spooren. (1998). Introduction: Discourse markers and coherence relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 131-133.

Rittgen, P. (2008). A contract-based architecture for business networks. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12 (4), 115-145.

Rocchi, Cesare and Massimo Zancanaro. (2003). Generation of video documentaries from discourse structures. Proceedings of 9th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (EWNLG 9). Budapest, Hungary.

Romera, Magdalena. (2004). Discourse Functional Units: The Expression of Coherence Relations in Spoken Spanish. Munich: LINCOM.

Rösner, Dietmar. (1993). Intentions, rhetoric, or discourse relations? A case from multilingual document generation. Proceedings of Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, ACL (pp. 106-109). Ohio State University.

Rösner, Dietmar and Manfred Stede. (1992). Customizing RST for the automatic production of technical manuals. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rösner and O. Stock (Eds.), Aspects of Automated Language Generation (pp. 119-214). Berlin: Springer.

Rossari, Corinne. (2001). Les relations de discours: Approches rhétoriques, approches pragmatiques et approches sémantiques. Verbum, XXIII (1), 59-72.

Rutledge, Lloyd, Brian Bailey, Jacco van Ossenbruggen, Lynda Hardman and Joost Geurts. (2000). Generating presentation constraints from rhetorical structure. Proceedings of 11th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. 19-28). San Antonio, TX.

Rutledge, Lloyd, Jim Davis, Jacco van Ossenbruggen and Lynda Hardman. (2000). Inter-dimensional hypermedia communicative devices for rhetorical structure. Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Modeling (MMM00) (pp. 89-105). Nagano, Japan.

Safranj, Jelisaveta. (2007). Types of attribution relation in the Financial Times corpus. Proceedings of English Language and Literature Studies: Structures across Cultures, ELLSSAC. Belgrade.

Safranj, Jelisaveta. (2008). Rhetorical organization of business English newspaper articles. Proceedings of FLLAS International Conference: Language for Specific Purposes - Theory and Practice. Belgrade.

Safranj, Jelisaveta. (2008). Rhetorical Structure in Business English Discourse. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Belgrade, Belgrade.

Salkie, Raphael and Sarah Louise Oates. (1999). Contrast and Concession in French and English. Languages in Contrast, 2 (1), 27-56.

26

Sanders, Ted. (1986). De invloed van globale teksteigenschappen op het begrijpen en onthouden van teksten (The influence of global properties of text on understanding and remembering text). Unpublished master's thesis, Tilburg University.

Sanders, Ted. (1997). Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes, 24, 119-147.

Sanders, Ted, Jentine Land and Gerben Mulder. (2007). Linguistic markers of coherence improve text comprehension in functional contexts. Information Design Journal, 15 (3), 219-235.

Sanders, Ted and Leo Noordman. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29 (1), 37-60.

Sanders, Ted and Joost Schilperoord. (2008). Text structure as a window on the cognition of writing: How text analysis provides insights in writing products and writing processes. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham and J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 386-402). New York: Guilford Press.

Sanders, Ted and Wilbert Spooren. (1999). Communicative intentions and coherence relations. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk and E. Ventola (Eds.), Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse: How to Create It and How to Describe It (pp. 235-250). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Sanders, Ted, Wilbert Spooren and Leo Noordman. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15 (1), 1-35.

Sanders, Ted, Wilbert Spooren and Leo Noordman. (1993). Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation. Cognitive Linguistics, 4 (2), 93-133.

Sanders, Ted and Carel van Wijk. (1993). PISA A Procedure for Incremental Structure Analysis of Expository Texts. Unpublished manuscript, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Sanders, Ted and Carel van Wijk. (1996). PISA: A procedure for analyzing the structure of explanatory texts. Text, 16 (1), 91-132.

Sanfranj, Jelisaveta. (2008). Retoricka struktura u diskursu engleskog poslovnog jezika. Pedagoska stvarnost, 54 (9-10), 990-1003.

Sarjala, Marja. (1994). Signalling of reason and cause relations in academic discourse. Anglicana Turkuensia, 13, 89-98.

Say, Bilge and Varol Akman. (1997). Current apporaches to punctuation in computational linguistics. Computers and the Humanities, 30 (6), 457-469.

Schauer, Holger. (2000). From elementary discourse units to complex ones. Proceedings of 1st SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 46-55). Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

Schauer, Holger. (2000). Referential structure and coherence structure. Proceedings of 7e conférence annuelle sur le traitement automatique des langues naturelles (TALN 2000) (pp. 327-336). Lausanne, Switzerland.

Schauer, Holger and Udo Hahn. (2000). Phrases as carriers of coherence relations. Proceedings of 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 429-434). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Schauer, Holger and Udo Hahn. (2001). Anaphoric cues for coherence relations. Proceedings of International Euroconference 'Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing', RANLP 2001 (pp. 228-234). Tzigov Chark, Bulgaria.

Scheppers, F. (2003). P(ragmatic)-trees. Coherence, intentionality and cognitive content in discourse and non-verbal action. Journal of Pragmatics, 35 (5), 665-694.

Schilder, Frank. (1998). Temporal discourse markers and the flow of events. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 58-61). Montréal, Canada.

Schilder, Frank. (1998). An underspecified segmented discourse representation theory. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 1188-1192). Montréal, Canada.

Schilder, Frank. (2000). Robust text analysis via underspecification. Proceedings of 1st workshop on RObust Methods in Analysis of Natural language Data (ROMAND 2000) (pp. 105-120). Lausanne, Switzerland.

27

Schilder, Frank. (2002). Robust discourse parsing via discourse markers, topicality and position. Natural Language Engineering, 8 (2/3), 235-255.

Scott, Donia and Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza. (1990). Getting the message across in RST-based text generation. In R. Dale, C. Mellish and M. Zock (Eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation (pp. 47-73). London: Academic Press.

Scott, Donia, Judy Delin and Anthony Hartley. (1999). Identifying congruent pragmatic relations in procedural texts. Languages in Contrast, 1 (1), 45-82.

Scott, Mike. (2001). Mapping key words to 'problem' and 'solution'. In M. Scott and G. Thompson (Eds.), Patterns of Text: In Honour of Michael Hoey (pp. 109-127). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Seville, Helen. (1999). Experiments with discourse structure. Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-3) (pp. 233-246). Tilburg, Netherlands.

Sharoff, Serge and Lena Sokolova. (1995). Analysis of rhetorical structures in technical manuals and their multilingual generation. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multilingual Generation (IJCAI'95) (pp. 119-128). Montréal, Canada.

Shaw, James. (1998). Clause agregation using linguistic knowledge. Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 9) (pp. 138-147). Niagra-on-the-Lake, Canada.

Shinmori, Akihiro, Manabu Okumura, Yuzo Marukawa and Makoto Iwayama. (2002). Rhetorical structure analysis of Japanese patent claims using cue phrases. Proceedings of the 3rd NTCIR Workshop. Tokyo, Japan.

Sibun, Penelope. (1992). Generating text without trees. Computational Intelligence, 8 (1), 102-122. Sidner, Candace L. (1993). On discourse relations, rhetorical relations and rhetoric. Proceedings of

Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, ACL (pp. 122-124). Ohio State University.

Siepmann, Dirk. (2005). Discourse Markers across Languages. New York: Routledge. Sitter, Stefan and Elisabeth Maier. (1992). Rhetorical relations in a model of information-seeking

dialogues. 10th. European Conference on Artificial Itelligence. Vienna, Austria. Smith, Caroline L. (2004). Topic transitions and durational prosody in reading aloud: Production and

modeling. Speech Communication, 42 (3-4), 247-270. Smith, Eliot. (1997). A Computational Model of On-Line Story Understanding (Thesis Progress Report).

Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham. Somasundaran, Swapna, Galileo Namata, Janyce Wiebe and Lise Getoor. (2009). Supervised and

unsupervised methods in employing discourse relations for improving opinion polarity classification. Proceedings of Conference on Empirical Methods in NLP (EMNLP). Singapore.

Soria, Claudia and Giacomo Ferrari. (1998). Lexical marking of discourse relations: Some experimental findings. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (pp. 36-42). Montréal, Canada.

Soricut, Radu and Daniel Marcu. (2003). Sentence level discourse parsing using syntactic and lexical information. Proceedings of Human Language Technology and North American Association for Computational Linguistics Conference (HLT-NAACL'03). Edmonton, Canada.

Souza, Edson Rosa Francisco de. (2008). A noção de discurso em modelos teóricos. Signum: Estudos da Linguagem, 11 (1), 237-256.

Souza, Edson Rosa Francisco de. (2009). Gramaticalização dos itens linguisticos assim, já e aí no português brasileiro: um estudo sob a perspectiva da gramática discursivo-funcional [Grammaticalization of linguistic items assim, ja and ai in Brazilian Portuguese: A functional discourse grammar approach]. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.

Sparck-Jones, Karen. (1995). Discourse modelling for automatic summarising. In E. Hajicová, M. Cervenka, O. Leška and P. Sgall (Eds.), Prague Linguistic Circle Papers (Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague nouvelle série) (pp. 201-227). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

28

Spenader, Jennifer and Anna Lobanova. (2009). Reliable discourse markers for contrast relations. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computational Semantics. Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Spooren, Wilbert. (1997). The processing of underspecified coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 24, 149-168.

Spooren, Wilbert and Ted Sanders. (2008). The acquisition order of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (12), 2003-2026.

Sporleder, Caroline. (2007). Manually vs. automatically labelled data in discourse relation classification. Effects of example and feature selection. LDV-Forum, Journal for Computational Linguistics and Language Technology, 22 (1), 1-20.

Sporleder, Caroline and Mirella Lapata. (2005). Discourse chunking and its application to sentence compression. Proceedings of the 2005 Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP-05). Vancouver, Canada.

Sporleder, Caroline and Alex Lascarides. (2005). Exploiting linguistic cues to classify rhetorical relations. Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP-05). Borovets, Bulgaria.

Sporleder, Caroline and Alex Lascarides. (2008). Using automatically labelled examples to classify rhetorical relations: An assesment. Natural Language Engineering, 14 (3), 369-416.

Stede, M. (2004). Does discourse processing need discourse topics? Theoretical Linguistics, 30 (2-3), 241-253.

Stede, Manfred. (2004). The Potsdam commentary corpus. Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Annotation, 42nd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Barcelona, Spain.

Stede, Manfred. (2008). Disambiguating rhetorical structure. Research in Language and Computation, 6, 311-332.

Stede, Manfred. (to appear). RST Revisited: Disentangling nuclearity. In C. Fabricius-Hansen and W. Ramm (Eds.), 'Subordination' versus 'Coordination' in Sentence and Text. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Stede, Manfred and Silvan Heintze. (2004). Machine-assisted rhetorical structure annotation. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING-04. Geneva, Switzerland.

Stede, Manfred and Birte Schmitz. (2000). Discourse particles and discourse functions. Machine Translation, 15 (1-2), 125-147.

Stede, Manfred and Carla Umbach. (1998). DiMLex: A lexicon of discourse markers for text generation and understanding. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 1238-1242). Montréal, Canada.

Stede, Manfred, Leo Wanner and Eduard Hovy (Eds.). (1998). Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers. Montréal, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Steen, Gerard. (1999). Analyzing metaphor in literature: With examples from William Wordsworth's 'I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud'. Poetics Today, 20 (3), 499-522.

Steen, Gerard. (2002). Identifying metaphor in language: A cognitive approach. Style, 36 (3), 386-407. Steen, Gerard. (2004). Can discourse properties of metaphor affect metaphor recognition? Journal of

Pragmatics, 36 (7), 1295-1313. Stent, Amanda. (2000). Rhetorical structure in dialog. Proceedings of First International Conference on

Natural Language Generation (INLG'2000) (pp. 247-252). Mitzpe Ramon, Israel. Stent, Amanda and Martín Molina. (2009). Evaluating automatic extraction of rules for sentence plan

construction. Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGDIAL Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue (pp. 290-297). London, UK.

Stevenson, Rosemary, Alistair Knott, Jon Oberlander and Sharon McDonald. (2000). Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 225-262.

Stewart, Anne Merrill. (1987). Clause-Combining in Conchucos Quechua Discourse. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.

29

Subba, Rajen. (2007). Exploiting event semantics to parse the rhetorical structure of natural language text. Proceedings of Doctoral Consortium, North American Association for Computational Linguistics. Rochester, NY.

Subba, Rajen and Barbara Di Eugenio. (2009). An effective discourse parser that uses rich linguistic information. Proceedings of HLT-ACL 2009 (pp. 566-574). Boulder, CO.

Subba, Rajen, Barbara Di Eugenio and Su Nam Kim. (2006). Discourse parsing: Learning FOL rules based on rich verb semantic representations to automatically label rhetorical relations. Workshop "Learning from structured data" at the 11th Conference of European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 33-40). Trento, Italy.

Sumita, Kazuo, Kenji Ono, T. Chino, T. Ukita and S. Amano. (1992). A discourse structure analyzer for Japanese text. Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems (pp. 1133-1140). Tokyo, Japan.

Sutcliffe, A. and P. Faraday. (1994). Systematic Design for Task-Related Multimedia Interfaces. Information and Software Technology, 36 (4), 225-234.

Sutcliffe, A. G., S. Kurniawan and J. E. Shin. (2006). A method and advisor tool for multimedia user interface design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64 (4), 375-392.

T’sou, Benjamin K., Tom B. Y. Lai, Samuel W. K. Chan, Weijun Gao and Xuegang Zhan. (2000). Enhancement of a Chinese discourse marker tagger with C 4.5. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd Chinese Language Processing Workshop, ACL, Hong Kong.

Taboada, Maite. (2001). Collaborating through Talk: The Interactive Construction of Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad Complutense, Madrid.

Taboada, Maite. (2004). Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Taboada, Maite. (2004). Rhetorical relations in dialogue: A contrastive study. In C. L. Moder and A. Martinovic-Zic (Eds.), Discourse across Languages and Cultures (pp. 75-97). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Taboada, Maite. (2006). Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 38 (4), 567-592.

Taboada, Maite. (2008). Implicit and explicit coherence relations (Invited presentation). Paper presented at the 18th Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Memphis, TN.

Taboada, Maite. (2008). SFU Review Corpus [Corpus]. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University, http://www.sfu.ca/~mtaboada/research/SFU_Review_Corpus.html.

Taboada, Maite. (2009). Implicit and explicit coherence relations. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of Course (pp. 127-140). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Taboada, Maite and Julia Lavid. (2003). Rhetorical and thematic patterns in scheduling dialogues: A generic characterization. Functions of Language, 10 (2), 147-179.

Taboada, Maite and William C. Mann. (2006). Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Discourse Studies, 8 (4), 567-588.

Taboada, Maite and William C. Mann. (2006). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies, 8 (3), 423-459.

Taboada, Maite and Jan Renkema. (2008). Discourse relations reference corpus [Corpus]. Vancouver and Tilburg: Simon Fraser University and Tilburg University, http://www.sfu.ca/rst/06tools/discourse_relations_corpus.html.

Taboada, Maite, Kimberly Voll and Julian Brooke. (2008). Extracting Sentiment as a Function of Discourse Structure and Topicality (Technical Report No. 2008-20): Simon Fraser University.

Takeshita, Atsushi , Takafumi Inoue, Kazuo Tanaka and Toru Nakagawa. (1997). Method and apparatus for recognizing topic structure of language data. United States Patent 5,642,520: Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

30

Tappe, Heike and Frank Schilder. (1998). Coherence in spoken discourse. Proceedings of 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL'98) (Vol. 2, pp. 1294-1298). Montréal, Canada.

Taylor, P. J. (2002). A cylindrical model of communication behavior in crisis negotiations. Human Communication Research, 28 (1), 7-48.

Taylor, P. J. and I. Donald. (2004). The structure of communication behavior in simulated and actual crisis negotiations. Human Communication Research, 30 (4), 443-478.

Tetreault, Joel R. (2005). Decomposing discourse. In A. Branco, T. McEnery and R. Mitkov (Eds.), Anaphora Processing: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modelling (pp. 73-95). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Teufel, Simone, Jean Carletta and Marc Moens. (1999). An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles. Proceedings of 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'99) (pp. 110-117). Bergen, Norway.

Teufel, Simone and Marc Moens. (2002). Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical structure. Computational Linguistics, 28 (4), 409-445.

Thielemann, Nadine. (2007). Dissension markers and their function in argumentative interaction. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 52 (2), 326-352.

Thione, Gian Lorenzo, Martin van der Berg, Christopher Culy and Livia Polanyi. (2004). LiveTree: An integrated workbench for discourse processing. Proceedings of the ACL 2004 Workshop on Discourse Annotation. Barcelona, Spain.

Thione, Gian Lorenzo, Martin van der Berg, Livia Polanyi and Christopher Culy. (2004). Hybrid text summarization: Combining external relevance measures with structural analysis. Proceedings of the ACL 2004 Workshop Text Summarization Branches Out. Barcelona, Spain.

Thomas, Stephen F. (1995). Rhetorical Structure Theory. Studies in Machine Translation and Natural Language Processing, 9, 159-174.

Thompson, G. (2005). But me some buts: A multidimensional view of conjunction. Text, 25 (6), 763-791. Thompson, Sandra A. and William C. Mann. (1987). Antithesis: A study in clause combining and

discourse structure. In R. Steele and T. Threadgold (Eds.), Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday, Volume II (pp. 359-381). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Thompson, Sandra A. and William C. Mann. (1987). Rhetorical Structure Theory: A framework for the analysis of texts. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 1 (1), 79-105.

Timmerman, Sander E.J. (2007). Automatic Recognition of Structural Relations in Dutch Text. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Tofiloski, Milan, Julian Brooke and Maite Taboada. (2009). A syntactic and lexical-based discourse segmenter. Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 77-80). Singapore.

Torrance, Mark and Nadjet Bouayad-Agha. (2001). Rhetorical structure analysis as a method for understanding writing processes. In L. Degand, Y. Bestgen, W. Spooren and L. van Waes (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Discourse. Amsterdam: Nodus.

Trabasso, Tom and Linda L. Sperry. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24 (5), 595-611.

Trail, Ronald L. and Austin Hale. (1995). A Rhetorical Structure Analysis of a Kalasha Narrative. Horsleys Green: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Traum, David. (1993). Rhetorical relations, action and intentionality in conversation. Proceedings of ACL SIG Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 132-135). Columbus, Ohio.

Umbach, Carla. (2005). Contrast and information structure: a focus-based analysis of but. Linguistics, 43 (1), 207-232.

Unger, Christoph. (1996). The scope of discourse connectives: Implications for discourse organization. Journal of Linguistics, 32, 403-438.

31

Uzêda, Vinícius Rodrigues de, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro Pardo and Maria das Gracas Volpe Nunes. (2007). Estudo e Avaliação de Métodos de Sumarização Automática de Textos Baseados na RST (Technical Report No. NILC-TR-07-07). São Carlos, Brazil: Núcleo Interinstitucional de Lingüística Computacional.

Uzuner, Ozlem, Randall Davis and Boris Katz. (2003). Using Discourse-Based Text Features for Evaluating Text Similarity. Unpublished manuscript.

van Eijk, Jan and Hans Kamp. (1996). Representing Discourse in Context (Article for submission No. CS-R9610). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica.

Van Kuppevelt, J. (1995). Main structure and side structure in discourse. Linguistics, 33 (4), 809-833. Van Kuppevelt, J. (1996). Inferring from topics - Scalar implicatures as topic-dependent inferences.

Linguistics and Philosophy, 19 (4), 393-443. van Wijk, Carel and Ted Sanders. (1999). Identifying writing strategies through text analysis. Written

Communication, 16 (1), 51-75. Vander Linden, Keith. (1994). Generating precondition expressions in instructional text. Proceedings of

32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'94) (pp. 42-49). Las Cruces, New Mexico.

Vander Linden, Keith , Susanna Cumming and James H. Martin. (1992). Using system networks to build rhetorical structures. In R. Dale, E. Hovy, D. Rösner and O. Stock (Eds.), Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation (pp. 183-198). Berlin: Springer.

Vander Linden, Keith, Susanna Cumming and James H. Martin. (1992). The Expression of Local Rhetorical Relations in Instructional Text (Technical Report No. CU-CS-585-92). Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado, Boulder.

Vander Linden, Keith and James Martin. (1995). Expressing rhetorical relations in instructional text: A case study of the purpose relation. Computational Linguistics, 21 (1), 29-57.

Verberne, Suzan, Lou Boves, Peter-Arno Coppen and Nelleke Oostdijk. (2007). Exploring discourse structure for Why-QA. Paper presented at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference, Göteborg, Sweden.

Verdejo, Felisa and Thanasis Daradoumis. (1995). Using rhetorical relations in building a coherent conversational teaching session. In R.-J. Beun, M. Baker and M. Reiner (Eds.), Dialogue and Instruction: Modeling Interaction in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 56-71). Berlin: Springer.

Verhagen, Arie. (2001). Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or: Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord and W. Spooren (Eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects (pp. 337-357). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Vet, Co. (1999). Temps verbaux, relations rhetoriques et chaines topicales (Verb tense, rhetorical relations, and topical chains). Travaux de Linguistique, 39, 59-75.

Virtanen, Tuija. (1995). Analysing argumentative strategies: A reply to a complaint. Anglicana Turkuensia, 14, 539-547.

Vivanco, Verónica. (2005). The absence of connectives and the maintenance of coherence in publicity texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (8), 1233-1249.

Voll, Kimberly and Maite Taboada. (2007). Not all words are created equal: Extracting semantic orientation as a function of adjective relevance. Proceedings of the 20th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 337-346). Gold Coast, Australia.

Wahlster, W., E. Andre, W. Graf and T. Rist. (1991). Knowledge-Based Media Coordination in Intelligent User Interfaces. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 549, 2-17.

Wahlster, Wolfgang, Elisabeth André, Wolfgang Finkler, Hans-Jürgen Profitlich and Thomas Rist. (1993). Plan-based integration of natural language and graphics generation. Artificial Intelligence, 63 (387-427).

Wahlster, Wolfgang, Elisabeth André, Winifred Graf and Thomas Rist. (1991). Designing illustrated texts: How language production is influenced by graphics generation. Proceedings of 5th Conference of the

32

European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'91) (pp. 8-14). Berlin, Germany.

Walker, Marilyn and Owen Rambow. (1994). The role of cognitive modelling in achieving communicative intentions. Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (IWNLG 7) (pp. 171-180). Kennebunkport, Maine.

Walton, D. and C. A. Reed. (2005). Argumentation schemes and enthymemes. Synthese, 145 (3), 339-370. Webber, Bonnie. (2004). D-LTAG: extending lexicalized TAG to discourse. Cognitive Science, 28 (5),

751-779. Webber, Bonnie, Aravind K Joshi, Eleni Miltsakaki, Rashmi Prasad, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee and

Katherine Forbes. (2005). A short introduction to the Penn Discourse TreeBank. Copenhagen Working Papers in Language and Speech Processing.

Webber, Bonnie and Aravind K. Joshi. (1998). Anchoring a lexicalised Tree-Adjoining Grammar for discourse. Proceedings of COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Markers and Discourse Relations (pp. 86-92). Montréal, Canada.

Webber, Bonnie, Alistair Knott and Aravind K. Joshi. (1999). Multiple discourse connectives in a lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar for discourse. Proceedings of 3rd International Workshop on Computational Semantics (pp. 309-325). Tilburg, Netherlands.

Webber, Bonnie, Alistair Knott, Matthew Stone and Aravind K. Joshi. (1999). Discourse relations: A structural and presuppositional account using lexicalised TAG. Proceedings of 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 41-48). College Park, Maryland.

Webber, Bonnie, Alistair Knott, Matthew Stone and Aravind K. Joshi. (1999). What are little texts made of? A structural and presuppositional account using lexicalised TAG. Proceedings of International Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse (LORID'99). Edinburgh, UK.

Webber, Bonnie, Matthew Stone, Aravind K. Joshi and Alistair Knott. (2003). Anaphora and discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 29 (4), 545-587.

Wheatley, J. (1996). Flowchart representations of genre in professional communication. Javnost-the Public, 3 (4), 27-38.

Wiebe, Janyce. (1993). Issues in linguistic segmentation. Proceedings of ACL SIG Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations (pp. 148-151). Columbus, Ohio.

Wiebe, Janyce, Graeme Hirst and D. Horton. (1996). Language use in context. Communications of the ACM, 39 (1), 102-111.

Wiebe, Janyce, T. P. O'Hara, T. Ohrstrom-Sandgren and K. J. McKeever. (1998). An empirical approach to temporal reference resolution. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 9, 247-293.

Williams, Sandra and Richard Power. (2008). Deriving rhetorical complexity data from the RST-DT corpus. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (pp. 2720-2724). Marrakech, Morocco.

Williams, Sandra and Ehud Reiter. (2003). A corpus analysis of discourse relations for natural language generation. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 899-908). Lancaster, UK.

Williamson, Jeanine Mary. (2000). The Vocabulary and Rhetorical Structures in Literary Studies Articles about Molly Bloom: A Description, and Applications for Information Science. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Wolf, Florian. (2004). Coherence in Natural Language: Data Structures and Applications. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Wolf, Florian and Edward Gibson. (2004). Paragraph-, word-, and coherence-based approaches to sentence ranking: A comparison of algorithm and human performance. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Barcelona, Spain.

Wolf, Florian and Edward Gibson. (2004). Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based analysis. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). Geneva, Switzerland.

Wolf, Florian and Edward Gibson. (2004). A response to Marcu (2003). Discourse structure: trees or graphs? Unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

33

34

Wolf, Florian and Edward Gibson. (2005). Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based analysis. Computational Linguistics, 31 (2), 249-287.

Wolf, Florian and Edward Gibson. (2006). Coherence in Natural Language: Data Structures and Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wolf, Florian, Edward Gibson and Timothy Desmet. (2004). Coherence and pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19 (6), 665-675.

Wolf, Florian, Edward Gibson, Amy Fisher and Meredith Knight. (2003). A procedure for collecting a database of texts annotated with coherence relations. Unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Wolf, Florian, Edward Gibson, Amy Fisher and Meredith Knight. (2005). Discourse GraphBank, LDC2005T08 [Corpus]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.

Wong, Cecilia S. M. (2004). Automatic Text Analysis using Rhetorical Structure Theory with application for information search and retrieval. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Wong, Cecilia S. M. and Jonathan J. Webster. (2001). Linguistic description and exploration using RDF (Resource Description Framework). 2001 Joint International Conference of the Association for Computers and the Humanities and the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing. New York.

Ye, S., T. S. Chua, M. Y. Kan and L. Qiu. (2007). Document concept lattice for text understanding and summarization. Information Processing and Management, 43 (6), 1643-1662.

Yetim, F. (1994). Transparency of Knowledge-Based Systems - State-of-the-Art and Trends in Research in the Field of Explanation Components. Nachrichten Fur Dokumentation, 45 (5), 291-297.

Yondem, M. T. and G. Ucoluk. (2003). A realistic success criterion for discourse segmentation. In Computer and Information Sciences - Iscis 2003 (Vol. 2869, pp. 592-600).

You, G. N. and R. Rada. (1994). A Systematic-Approach to Outline Manipulation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41 (3), 283-308.

Young, R Michael and Johanna D Moore. (1994). Does discourse planning require a special-purpose planner? Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Planning for Inter-Agent Communication. Seattle, Washington.

Yue, Ming and Zhiwei Feng. (2005). Findings in a preliminary study on the rhetorical structure of Chinese TV news reports. Paper presented at the First Computational Systemic Functional Grammar Conference, Sydney, Australia.

Zetie, Kendrik P. (1996). The Strange Case of the Bumble Bee Which Flew, 2004, from http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/~ben/zetie1.htm

Zhang, Z. and Dragomir Radev. (2005). Combining labeled and unlabeled data for learning cross-document structural relationships. In Natural Language Processing - Ijcnlp 2004 (Vol. 3248, pp. 32-41).

Zhang, Zhu, Sasha Blair-Goldensohn and Dragomir Radev. (2002). Towards CST-enhanced summarization. Proceedings of AAAI 2002. Edmonton, Alberta.

Zou, Hongjian and Erhong Yang. (2007). Event counts as elementary unit in discourse annotation. Recent Advance of Chinese Computing Technologies, 453-458.

Zukerman, Ingrid and Richard McConachy. (1993). An optimizing method for structuring inferentially linked discourse. Proceedings of 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-93) (pp. 202-207). Washington, DC.

Zukerman, Ingrid and Richard McConachy. (1995). Generating discourse across several user models: Maximizing belief while avoiding boredom and overload. Proceedings of 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAL'95) (pp. 1251-1257). Montréal, Canada.

Zukerman, Ingrid and Richard McConachy. (2001). Wishful: A discourse planning system that considers a user's inferences. Computational Intelligence, 17 (1), 1-61.