rubric peter ian video project

4
Multimedia Project : ESL video presentation CATEGORY 4 3 2 Workload Content Originality Teacher Name: Peter Frost/Ian Henderson Student Name: ________________________________________ The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members. The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person. The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work. Covers topic in- depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. At least 10 phrasal verbs, idioms, or a combination of both. These should be identified with text in the video. Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. At least 6 phrasal verbs, idioms, or a combination of both. These should be identified with text in the video. Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. At least 3 phrasal verbs, idioms, or a combination of both. These should be identified with text in the video. Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence

Upload: pfrosty

Post on 21-Jan-2016

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rubric Peter Ian Video Project

Multimedia Project : ESL video presentation

CATEGORY 4 3 2Workload

Content

Originality

Rough Draft

Teacher Name: Peter Frost/Ian Henderson

Student Name: ________________________________________

The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members.

The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person.

The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work.

Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. At least 10 phrasal verbs, idioms, or a combination of both. These should be identified with text in the video.

Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. At least 6 phrasal verbs, idioms, or a combination of both. These should be identified with text in the video.

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. At least 3 phrasal verbs, idioms, or a combination of both. These should be identified with text in the video.

Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.

Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.

Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.

Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and extensively edits based on peer feedback.

Rough draft brought on due date. Student shares with peer and peer makes edits.

Provides feedback and/or edits for peer, but own rough draft was not ready for editing.

Page 2: Rubric Peter Ian Video Project

Oral Presentation

Video

Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. Pronunciation is clear and volume is loud enough

Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention. Few pronunciation mistakes, volume is loud enough.

Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience attention most of the time. Difficult to hear student and many pronunciation errors.

Very clear images, no large gaps without speaking.

Clear images, few gaps without speaking.

Unclear images, several gaps without speaking.

Date Created: Nov 20, 2013 03:19 am (CST)

Page 3: Rubric Peter Ian Video Project

Multimedia Project : ESL video presentation

1The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work.

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. No phrasal verbs, idioms, or a combination of both.

Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.

Rough draft not ready for editing and did not participate in reviewing draft of peer.

Page 4: Rubric Peter Ian Video Project

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost. Difficult to hear and many pronunciation errors.

Images unclear and large amounts of time without students speaking.